Skip to main content
Download PDF

CC16 polymorphisms in asthma, asthma subtypes, and asthma control in adults from the Agricultural Lung Health Study

Respiratory Research volume 23, Article number: 305 (2022) Cite this article

A Correction to this article was published on 16 December 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

The club cell secretory protein (CC16) has anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects and is a potential early biomarker of lung damage. The CC16 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs3741240 risk allele (A) has been inconsistently linked to asthma; other tagging SNPs in the gene have not been explored. The aim was to determine whether CC16 tagging polymorphisms are associated with adult asthma, asthma subtypes or asthma control in the Agricultural Lung Health Study (ALHS).

Methods

The ALHS is an asthma case-control study nested in the Agricultural Health Study cohort. Asthma cases were individuals with current doctor diagnosed asthma, likely undiagnosed asthma, or asthma-COPD overlap defined by questionnaire. We also examined asthma subtypes and asthma control. Five CC16 tagging SNPs were imputed to 1000 Genomes Integrated phase 1 reference panel. Logistic regression was used to estimate associations between CC16 SNPs and asthma outcomes adjusted for covariates.

Results

The sample included 1120 asthma cases and 1926 controls of European ancestry, with a mean age of 63 years. The frequency of the risk genotype (AA) for rs3741240 was 12.5% (n = 382). CC16 rs3741240 was not associated with adult asthma outcomes. A tagging SNP in the CC16 gene, rs12270961 was associated with uncontrolled asthma (n = 208, ORadj= 1.4, 95% CI 1.0, 1.9; p = 0.03).

Conclusion

This study, the largest study to investigate associations between CC16 tagging SNPs and asthma phenotypes in adults, did not confirm an association of rs3741240 with adult asthma. A tagging SNP in CC16 suggests a potential relationship with asthma control.

Background

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory airway disease of complex etiology with a significant genetic contribution estimated to range between 35-70% [1, 2]. Environmental factors also play a critical role in asthma development and severity, as evidenced by the dramatic increasing trend in prevalence between 1980-2010 [3, 4] Genes and associated variants may indirectly affect susceptibility to asthma by altering normal processes in the lung in response to environmental agents [5,6,7,8].

The club cell secretory protein (CC16) has been implicated in multiple pulmonary diseases, including asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and smoking-induced lung cancer [9,10,11,12,13]. The CC16 gene found on chromosome 11q12.3, is highly expressed in the lung, and encodes a seemingly beneficial pneumoprotein, CC16 [14]. Abundantly secreted by non-ciliated club cells, [14] CC16 exerts anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects [10, 14] and moves across the lung epithelial-blood barrier upon inhalation of environmental respiratory insults [10, 15−19]. In healthy adults, the correspondence between CC16 levels in serum and in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid suggests its potential use as an early biomarker of lung injury and early development of respiratory disease [15]. Low serum CC16 serum levels have been associated with asthma, airway hyper-responsiveness, COPD severity, and lung function [11, 20, 21]. CC16 polymorphisms also influence CC16 protein levels [22, 23]. Laing et al., reported differences in plasma CC16 levels by the rs374120 genotype, with lowest levels seen in children homozygous for the A allele (CC16 concentrations by genotype: AA 6.79 µg/L, AG 9.17 µg/L and GG 10.01 µg/L) [9]. The influence of rs374120 genotype on CC16 levels continues into adulthood [22] with CC16 polymorphisms (including rs374120) estimated to account for 6% of the variability in circulating CC16 levels [24].

Genetic association studies of CC16 polymorphisms have been inconsistently associated with asthma in child and adult populations [25,26,27]. One study estimated children with the risk genotype (AA) for rs3741240 had nearly four times greater odds of asthma than those with the GG genotype [26]. Additionally, a recent meta-analysis analyzed data from 19 case-control studies and reported that those with the AA or AG genotype for CC16 rs3741240 had 1.3 times greater odds of asthma compared to the GG genotype (Pooled Odds Ratio = 1.29; 95% CI 1.08, 1.54) [27]. However, this effect was attenuated once studies contributing to heterogeneity, identified using Galbraith plots, were excluded [27]. All studies in the meta analysis had fewer than 650 asthmatics and fewer than 85 with the risk genotype [27]. These inconsistent results are not surprising given that asthma is a heterogeneous disease, the meta-analysis included studies from around the world with likely varying environmental exposures, and allele frequencies of the polymorphism vary by ethnicity.

The farming environment has historically been of interest to allergy and asthma researchers due to the unique diversity of exposures to bacteria, fungi, chemicals, and allergens that may influence risk [28,29,30,31,32]. Compared to the general population, farmers experience a lower prevalence of asthma diagnosis but more respiratory symptoms, including wheeze, cough, and phlegm [33]. Early-life and current farming exposures have been inconsistently associated with atopy or asthma in adults [33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44]. Among previous genetic association studies of CC16 polymorphisms and asthma, none were conducted within an agricultural population. Furthermore, many of these studies had modest sample sizes, were not limited to adults, were conducted outside the United States, and lacked defined asthma subtypes such as atopy, eosinophilia, asthma control, and exacerbations. No other polymorphisms in CC16 besides rs3741240 have been studied. Therefore, this study aims to determine whether CC16 tagging polymorphisms are associated with adult asthma, asthma subtypes, and asthma control, including exacerbations in adults, from the Agricultural Lung Health Study (ALHS). We also examined associations of CC16 polymorphisms with wheeze and with chronic bronchitis.

Methods

The Agricultural Lung Health Study (ALHS), a nested case-control study of adult asthma drawn from the larger Agricultural Health Study (AHS) [36, 45], enrolled 3301 individuals including 1223 asthma cases and 2078 controls [36]. The sample is predominantly farmers and farm spouses from Iowa and North Carolina [36, 45].

CC16 polymorphisms

Polymorphisms in the CC16 gene were genotyped using the UK Biobank Axiom Array by Affymetrix Asiom Genotyping Services with DNA extracted from blood or saliva from ALHS population [46]. Genetic variants were imputed to 1000 Genomes Integrated phase 1 reference panel [46].

For this study, we analyzed individuals of European ancestry (n = 3046 including 1,120 individuals with asthma) based on genome-wide association study (GWAS) ancestral principal components. We identified five tagging polymorphisms in the CC16 (SCGB1A1) gene: rs3741240, rs4963506, rs12270961, rs10897271, and rs11231085 using Genome Variation Server, HapMap and Complete Genomics with an r2 cutoff of 0.7 [47]. Allele frequencies for rs10897271 and rs11231085 were not in Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium, leaving three tagging polymorphisms for the analysis (i.e. rs3741240, rs4963506, rs12270961) [47].

Asthma

Current asthma cases were identified from responses to the most recent follow-up questionnaire for the parent AHS cohort [36]. The majority (n = 876) of cases self-reported current asthma by responding “yes” to the two questions “have you ever been diagnosed with asthma?” and “do you still have asthma?” and “no” to the two questions “have you ever been diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)?” and “have you ever been diagnosed with emphysema?”. To avoid missing undiagnosed asthma, 309 participants were classified as undiagnosed current asthma if they denied having a previous diagnosis of asthma, COPD, or emphysema but reported current asthma symptoms and the use of asthma medications, and a history of never smoking (n = 263) or minimal past smoking (≤ 10 pack-years, n = 46). Because of possible asthma and COPD overlap, we included 38 individuals as asthma cases based on reporting current asthma and a previous diagnosis of either COPD or emphysema as long as they were never-smokers (n = 28) or past-smokers (≤ 10 pack-years, n = 10) [36]. Controls were randomly selected from participants not meeting the asthma case definitions at the time of enrollment [36].

Asthma subtypes

Atopy was defined by having at least one of ten individual allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) ≥ 0.70 IU/mL [36]. Allergens included seasonal (Bermuda grass, ragweed, timothy grass, mountain cedar), perennial (Alternaria, dust mite, cat dander), and food (milk, egg, wheat). Atopic asthma subtypes were categorized into four groups: atopic asthma, non-atopic asthma, atopy alone, no atopy & no asthma. The eosinophilic asthma subgroups were defined using fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) > 50 ppb for eosinophilic asthma, non-eosinophilic asthma ≤ 50 ppb, eosinophilic alone > 50 ppb, and no asthma and not eosinophilic [48]. A sensitivity analysis was conducted classifying asthmatics as low FeNO < 25 ppb, intermediate FeNO 25–50 ppb, and high FeNO > 50 ppb.

Asthma Control and Exacerbations

Among adults diagnosed with asthma, asthma control was defined using the validated Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), with the modification that questions referenced the past two weeks instead of the past week [49]. For each individual, each question is scored ranging from 0 (no impairment) to 6 (maximum impairment). Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 percent predicted is also scored 0 to 6. The final score is the mean of the seven items (questionnaire and lung function) which ranges from 0 (totally controlled) to 6 (severely uncontrolled) [49, 50]. A binary variable, controlled (ACQ score < 1.5) versus uncontrolled (ACQ score ≥ 1.5) asthma was defined according to clinical guidelines from Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) [51]. A sensitivity analysis was conducted with asthma control as 3-levels (well controlled 0-0.75, moderately controlled 0.76–1.5, uncontrolled > 1.5) [51]. Asthma control was only evaluated among cases that self-reported current asthma [50]. Among adults with diagnosed asthma, asthma exacerbations were defined as ‘Yes’ to at least one of two questions “In the past 12 months did you get urgent treatment for an asthma attack at a doctor’s office, urgent care facility, or ER?” or “In the past 12 months have you been hospitalized overnight for asthma?”

Respiratory symptoms

Wheeze was defined as having wheezing or whistling in your chest during the past 12 months or wheeze when exerting during the past 12 months. Chronic cough was defined as having a cough on most days, for three consecutive months or more during the year for a duration of two years or more. Similarly, chronic phlegm was defined as bringing up phlegm on most days for three consecutive months or more during the year, for a duration of two years or more. Chronic bronchitis was defined as individuals self-reporting both chronic cough and phlegm.

Statistical analysis

We summarized demographic and clinical characteristics overall and by asthma status using basic descriptive statistics and evaluated univariate associations of CC16 polymorphisms with each respiratory outcome and each covariate using t-tests for continuous variables and Chi-square tests for categorical variables. Multinomial logistic regression models with generalized logit were used to evaluate associations between CC16 polymorphisms and asthma subtypes. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate associations between binary outcomes in analyses limited to diagnosed asthmatics, asthma control (controlled/uncontrolled), and having an exacerbation in the past year (yes/no). We assumed an additive genetic effect of CC16 polymorphisms on respiratory outcomes. With rs3741240 genotypes coded as AA = 2, AG = 1, GG = 0 and rs12270961 genotypes coded as GG = 2, AG = 1, AA = 0 and analyzed as ordinal variables. In sensitivity analysis, genotypes were analyzed as a 3-level categorical variable. For rs3741240 categorical genotype AA, AG, GG (reference) and for rs12270961 GG, AG, and AA (reference) based on published evidence of risk alleles [9, 27].

All regression models were adjusted for age (continuous), sex (Female or Male), state (Iowa or North Carolina), and smoking status (current, former, never). Additionally, asthma control and exacerbation models were adjusted for atopy; wheeze and chronic bronchitis models were adjusted for asthma status. Goodness of fit was evaluated using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to ensure the robustness of results and are described in the results section. The predetermined level of significance was two sided alpha < 0.05 and SAS (Cary, NC) was used for all analyses. Linkage Disequilibrium plot was created in Haploview version 4.2 [52].

Results

The present analysis included 3046 farmer and spouse participants from the ALHS with information on CC16 polymorphisms. Participants had an average age of 63 years, and most were current farmers (63%), and never (65%) or former (29%) smokers. Of the 1,120 adults with asthma, the majority were non-atopic (71%) and non-eosinophilic (87%) (Table 1).

Table 1 Characteristics of the Agricultural Lung Health Study Population
Full size table

The location of the tagging CC16 polymorphisms, linkage, and frequencies including Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE) are displayed in Fig. 1 and Table 1. In the ALHS, the frequency of the AA genotype for the rs3741240 polymorphism was 12.5%. The tagging polymorphisms rs4963506 and rs12270961 are in complete linkage disequilibrium. Therefore, we have chosen to present study results based on rs12270961 since neither SNP has been described in the published literature. The frequency of genotypes AA, AG, GG for rs12270961 this variant were 4%, 33%, and 63%, respectively. Genotype frequencies for the two polymorphisms (rs3741240 and rs12270961) did not vary by asthma status (Table 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

 A. Diagram of the CC16 (SCGB1A1) gene. In humans, the CC16 gene is located on chromosome 11q12.3. The gene is 18,108 bp in length, includes three exons and two introns. The rs3741240 polymorphism is in the untranslated region of Exon 1 which is downstream from the transcription initiation site. rs12270961 and rs4963506 are located 730 bp downstream within intron 1. B. Linkage disequilibrium (R2) plot for CC16 polymorphisms. rs12270961 and rs4963506 are in nearly complete linkage

Full size image

CC16 polymorphisms (rs3741240 and rs12270961) were not associated with asthma, asthma subtypes (Table 2), chronic bronchitis, or wheeze (Table 4). In sensitivity analyses of chronic bronchitis or wheeze, we performed a stratified analysis by asthma status, but results and conclusions were unchanged (Supplemental Tables 2 and 3). An additional sensitivity analysis was conducted examining relationships between asthma outcomes and CC16 rs3741240 treating the genotype as a 3-level categorical variable and there was no association (Supplemental Table 1). We also performed a sensitivity analysis with the outcome child-onset asthma, defined as asthma diagnosed on or before age 17 versus after age 17, and results were largely similar to the findings for asthma and asthma subtypes: rs3741240 Odds Ratio = 1.0 (95% CI 0.8, 1.2), p = 0.66), rs12270961 Odds Ratio = 1.1 (95% CI 0.9, 1.4), p = 0.45). For the eosinophilic asthma subtype outcome, we ran an additional model combining the AA and AG genotypes for rs12270961 (GG was reference) and results were not statistically significant (p = 0.93). Lastly, when we used a common atopy cutpoint of 0.35 (instead of 0.70) and re-analyzed the atopic asthma subtype outcome, results were broadly similar (Supplemental Table 4).

Table 2 Associations of CC16 polymorphisms with asthma and asthma subtypes in the ALHS (N = 3046)
Full size table

Among adults with asthma, assuming an additive genetic model, rs12270961 was associated with uncontrolled asthma (Table 3). Each additional copy of the G-allele, was associated with a 1.4-fold increase in the odds of uncontrolled asthma (95% CI 1.02,1.91; p = 0.03). If we do not assume an additive genetic model, the odds ratios are 0.7 (95% CI 0.3,1.8) for the AG genotype and 1.2 (95% CI 0.5,2.8) for the GG genotype compared to AA genotype.

Table 3 Associations between CC16 polymorphisms and uncontrolled asthma and exacerbations in the ALHS (N = 1120)
Full size table
Table 4 Associations between CC16 polymorphisms and chronic bronchitis and wheeze in the ALHS (N = 3046)
Full size table

A small number of participants with asthma experienced an exacerbation defined as an urgent healthcare visit for an asthma attack or overnight hospitalization for asthma in the past 12 months (2%, n = 59) and the CC16 polymorphisms were not associated with asthma exacerbations (Table 3).

Discussion

This is the first study to investigate the genetic effects of CC16 polymorphisms on adult asthma in a large United States sample. We did not find evidence of an association between CC16 polymorphisms with adult asthma, asthma subtypes, or respiratory symptoms. Our findings are consistent with several published studies, many of which were included in a meta-analyses by Nie et al. (19 case-control or cohort studies) and Cheng et al. (15 case-control studies), which both concluded CC16 rs3741240 was not associated with an increased risk of asthma [27, 53]. Several individual studies noted no association between CC16 rs3741240 and asthma in adults but there were several methodological differences that limit comparisons to the present study. For example, there were differences in how asthma was defined, inclusion/exclusion criteria, study location, and age of study population [54,55,56,57,58]. A limited number of studies have shown an increased odds of asthma in adults carrying the risk allele for rs3741240 [25, 27]. In a study by Taniguchi et al., they did not observe an association with asthma overall in Japanese adults but did report an association with late-onset asthma, diagnosed after age 40 (ORadj = 1.62 95% CI 1.09–2.40) adjusted for age, sex, atopy, and smoking status [25]. Differences in the classification of asthma, risk genotype frequency (higher in Japanese 18.8% vs. Europeans 11–12%) and environmental factors likely contributed to differences between their findings and ours. However, a novel association between a CC16 tagging SNP, rs12270961, and uncontrolled asthma was observed in this study.

Since asthma is a heterogenous disease, in addition to asthma overall, we investigated relationships between CC16 polymorphisms with asthma subtypes. We demonstrated no relationships between CC16 polymorphisms with asthma subtypes, atopic asthma, or eosinophilic asthma. Consistent with our findings, other studies have failed to observe an association between CC16 variants and atopy, atopic asthma, or eosinophilic inflammation. Nie et al. pooled data from all ages and found no evidence of a relationship between CC16 rs3741240 polymorphism with atopic asthma (OR = 1.1, 95% CI = 0.8–1.5, p = 0.57) [27]. It is worth noting, though, that atopic status was defined differently (i.e. skin prick test, total IgE, specific IgE) across the individual studies included in the meta-analysis [27]. Most commonly, atopy was included as a covariate in an asthma model and previous studies did not stratify asthma by atopic status [25, 54, 56, 57, 59]. Furthermore, Mansur et al. did not find an association between CC16 rs3741240 and adult asthma, the majority (86%) of which were atopic based on skin prick test to common allergens [54]. Others included atopy as a covariate in the analysis, not an outcome, or only presented unadjusted or crude results [25, 58]. Candelaria and colleagues noted an increased odds of atopic dermatitis (adjusted for age and gender) in an adult Danish population associated with the A-allele for rs3741240; no association was found with rhinitis or atopy, nor an interaction between current asthma*atopy [57]. Conversely, in atopic children with allergic rhinitis (mean age 11 years), Ku et al. noted an increased odds (unadjusted) of asthma in children with AA genotype compared to GG + AG [60].

Evaluation of genetic associations between CC16 polymorphisms and eosinophilic asthma in adults using FeNO, a biomarker of “allergic” inflammation, yielded no significant findings in our study. A study in children demonstrated that the AA genotype for rs3741240 was associated with elevated FeNO (> 30 ppb) in girls (not boys), but the sample size was minimal, with only six girls having the risk genotype of interest [61]. Other studies that measured blood eosinophils, but did not define asthma subtypes, found no association with CC16 rs3741240 [57, 60]. Unlike these previous studies, our sample of adults were primarily non-atopic and non-eosinophilic, which is consistent with existing knowledge of adult farming populations. Farmers often have a lower prevalence of allergic diseases and inflammatory markers (IgE, eosinophils) resulting from agricultural environmental exposures [28]. Therefore, our study contributes new information on CC16 polymorphisms in adults with non-allergy-driven asthma. While it does not appear the CC16 rs3741240 has a role in adult atopic or non-atopic asthma, our findings need to be confirmed in independent study populations.

We did find an association between CC16 polymorphisms and asthma control in ALHS. Asthma control is an indicator of how well the disease is being managed, and changes in lung function or symptoms (frequency or severity) over time may guide clinical decisions. Similarly, exacerbations can also inform treatment and management decisions because a higher frequency of attacks indicates a severe asthma subtype associated with higher risk of death [49]. We observed an increased odds of uncontrolled asthma associated with the G-allele of CC16 rs12270961 after adjusting for several confounders. No association was found with the exacerbation outcome. The rs12270961 polymorphism is located within an intron between exon 1 and 2, downstream of rs3741240 within the CC16 (SCGB1A1) gene. The clinical significance of the function of this polymorphism remains unknown, and further investigations may be necessary.

To the best of our knowledge, the relationship between rs3741240 and asthma control has not been previously investigated. Pre-bronchodilator percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) is included in the score to define uncontrolled asthma. The rs3741240 risk allele has been inconsistently linked to lung function in children [26, 62]. Furthermore, rs3741240 is associated with lower levels of protein in serum overall and in those with asthma, [9, 22] and low CC16 levels (serum) predict lower lung function [11, 21]. While people with asthma may have lower levels of CC16 serum or bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) [63, 64], lung function does not always correlate with asthma control or exacerbations, especially when only evaluated at a single time point [65]. We do not know if the CC16 serum levels of the ALHS adult farmers with asthma varied by rs3741240 genotype and if those levels may be more informative than the polymorphisms alone. Therefore, CC16 may be involved in pathways related to lung function but relevance to asthma control or exacerbations is not known and warrants further study. Lastly, we did not observe any association between CC16 polymorphisms with respiratory symptoms (wheeze, chronic bronchitis).

Our study had several notable strengths. Primarily, it had the largest sample size to date to investigate genetic associations between CC16 polymorphisms and asthma in adults. Current asthma is well defined using a series of questions to classify current asthma, undiagnosed asthma, and asthma-COPD overlap – making it unlikely asthma cases were missing or misclassified. However, in a population of older adults with asthma, confusion with COPD remains possible. We also contributed to the existing knowledge base by being the first to evaluate CC16 genetic associations with asthma subtypes and asthma control, including exacerbations using validated measures. In addition, there are limitations of the study. Our findings are limited to those with European ancestry; thus these findings may not be generalizable to other ancestries. CC16 levels were not measured in this study, thus we could not explore relationships between levels, genotypes, and asthma outcomes. Asthma control questions were only asked of individuals who reported a diagnosis of asthma; consequently, the 26% of individuals included as possible asthmatics based on symptoms and medication use did not have these data. Asthma control and exacerbation history can change over time so future studies may consider longitudinally measuring these outcomes.

Conclusion

This study did not observe an association of CC16 rs3741240 with asthma, asthma subtypes, asthma control, exacerbations or respiratory symptoms in adults from the ALHS. However, there was an association between the G-allele of CC16 rs12270961 and uncontrolled asthma, a finding that requires further confirmation. The next steps may include evaluating CC16 polymorphisms and asthma between farm-exposed and non-farm populations. Also, genetic studies may investigate potential mechanisms of rs12270961 related to asthma symptoms or lung function.

Data availability

Data are not public but may be available upon request to Stephanie London PI of the ALHS at the National Instutue of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS).

Change history

Abbreviations

AHS:

Agricultural Health Study

ALHS:

Agricultural Lung Health Study

ACQ:

Asthma Control Questionnaire

BAL:

Bronchoalveolar lavage

COPD:

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease)

CC16:

Club cell secretory protein

FEV1 :

Forced expiratory volume in 1 s

FeNO:

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide

GWAS:

Genome-wide association study

GINA:

Global Initiative for Asthma

HWE:

Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium

IgE:

Immunoglobulin E

SCGB1A1:

Secretoglobin family 1 A member 1 referred to in main text as CC16 gene

References

  1. Duffy DL, Martin NG, Battistutta D, Hopper JL, Mathews JD. Genetics of asthma and hay fever in Australian twins. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990;142(6 Pt 1):1351–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/142.6_Pt_1.1351.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nieminen MM, Kaprio J, Koskenvuo M. A population-based study of bronchial asthma in adult twin pairs. Chest. 1991;100(1):70–5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.100.1.70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Eder W, Ege MJ, von Mutius E. The Asthma Epidemic. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(21):2226–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra054308.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. American Lung Association. Asthma Trends and Burden website. Accessed March 15. 2021. /research/trends-in-lung-disease/asthma-trends-brief/trends-and-burden.

  5. Ober C. Asthma Genetics in the Post-GWAS Era. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016;13(Suppl 1):85–90. doi:https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201507-459MG.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Poole JA. Farming-associated environmental exposures and effect on atopic diseases. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2012;109(2):93–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2011.12.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Smit LAM, Siroux V, Bouzigon E, et al. CD14 and toll-like receptor gene polymorphisms, country living, and asthma in adults. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;179(5):363–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200810-1533OC.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Smit L. Bouzigon M, Pin E. I, et al. 17q21 variants modify the association between early respiratory infections and asthma. Eur Respir J. 2010;36(1):57–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00154509.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Laing IA, Hermans C, Bernard A, Burton PR, Goldblatt J, Le Souëf PN. Association between Plasma CC16 Levels, the A38G Polymorphism, and Asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;161(1):124–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.161.1.9904073.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Laucho-Contreras ME, Polverino F, Gupta K, et al. Protective role for club cell secretory protein-16 (CC16) in the development of COPD. Eur Respir J. 2015;45(6):1544–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00134214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Guerra S, Halonen M, Vasquez MM, et al. Relation between circulating CC16 concentrations, lung function, and development of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease across the lifespan: a prospective study. Lancet Respir Med. 2015;3(8):613–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00196-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Guerra S, Vasquez MM, Spangenberg A, Halonen M, Martinez FD. Serum concentrations of club cell secretory protein (Clara) and cancer mortality in adults: a population-based, prospective cohort study. Lancet Respir Med. 2013;1(10):779–85. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(13)70220-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Linnoila RI, Szabo E, DeMayo F, Witschi H, Sabourin C, Malkinson A. The role of CC10 in pulmonary carcinogenesis: from a marker to tumor suppression. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000;923:249–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb05534.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Broeckaert F, Bernard A. Clara cell secretory protein (CC16): characteristics and perspectives as lung peripheral biomarker. Clin Exp Allergy. 2000;30(4):469–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Broeckaert F, Clippe A, Knoops B, Hermans C, Bernard A. Clara cell secretory protein (CC16): features as a peripheral lung biomarker. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000;923:68–77. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb05520.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bernard AM, Gonzalez-Lorenzo JM, Siles E, Trujillano G, Lauwerys R. Early decrease of serum Clara cell protein in silica-exposed workers. Eur Respir J. 1994;7(11):1932–7.

  17. Blomberg A, Mudway I, Svensson M, et al. Clara cell protein as a biomarker for ozone-induced lung injury in humans. Eur Respir J. 2003;22(6):883–8.

  18. Petrek M, Hermans C, Kolek V, Fialová J, Bernard A. Clara cell protein (CC16) in serum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of subjects exposed to asbestos. Biomarkers. 2002;7(1):58–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13547500110086892.

  19. Timonen KL, Hoek G, Heinrich J, et al. Daily variation in fine and ultrafine particulate air pollution and urinary concentrations of lung Clara cell protein CC16. Occup Environ Med. 2004;61(11):908–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2004.012849.

  20. Ma Y-N, Wang J, Lee YL, et al. Association of urine CC16 and lung function and asthma in Chinese children. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2015;36(4):59–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.2500/aap.2015.36.3853.

  21. Zhai J, Insel M, Addison KJ, et al. Club Cell Secretory Protein Deficiency Leads to Altered Lung Function. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;199(3):302–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201807-1345OC.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhai J, Stern DA, Sherrill DL, et al. Trajectories and Early Determinants of Circulating CC16 from Birth to Age 32 Years. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;198(2):267–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201712-2398LE.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Milne S, Li X, Hernandez Cordero AI, et al. Protective effect of club cell secretory protein (CC-16) on COPD risk and progression: a Mendelian randomisation study. Thorax. 2020;75(11):934–43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2019-214487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim DK, Cho MH, Hersh CP, et al. Genome-wide association analysis of blood biomarkers in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186(12):1238–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201206-1013OC.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Taniguchi N, Konno S, Hattori T, et al. The CC16 A38G polymorphism is associated with asymptomatic airway hyper-responsiveness and development of late-onset asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2013;111(5):376–81.e1. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2013.08.005.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Laing IA, de Klerk NH, Turner SW, et al. Cross-sectional and longitudinal association of the secretoglobin 1A1 gene A38G polymorphism with asthma phenotype in the Perth Infant Asthma Follow-up cohort. Clin Exp Allergy. 2009;39(1):62–71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2222.2008.03102.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Nie W, Xue C, Chen J, Xiu Q. Secretoglobin 1A member 1 (SCGB1A1) + 38A/G polymorphism is associated with asthma risk: a meta-analysis. Gene. 2013;528(2):304–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2013.06.049.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wells AD, Poole JA, Romberger DJ. Influence of farming exposure on the development of asthma and asthma-like symptoms. Int Immunopharmacol. 2014;23(1):356–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2014.07.014.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Aberg N. Asthma and allergic rhinitis in Swedish conscripts. Clin Experimental Allergy: J Br Soc Allergy Clin Immunol. 1989;19(1):59–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2222.1989.tb02345.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kirjavainen PV, Karvonen AM, Adams RI, et al. Farm-like indoor microbiota in non-farm homes protects children from asthma development. Nat Med. 2019;25(8):1319–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-019-0546-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Genuneit J. Exposure to farming environments in childhood and asthma and wheeze in rural populations: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2012;23(6):509–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3038.2012.01312.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lee MK, Carnes MU, Butz N, et al. Exposures Related to House Dust Microbiota in a U.S. Farming Population. Environ Health Perspect. 2018;126(6):067001. doi:https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP3145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hoppin JA, Umbach DM, Long S, et al. Respiratory disease in United States farmers. Occup Environ Med. 2014;71(7):484–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2013-101983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wunschel J, Poole JA. Occupational agriculture organic dust exposure and its relationship to asthma and airway inflammation in adults. J Asthma. 2016;53(5):471–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/02770903.2015.1116089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Douwes J, Travier N, Huang K, et al. Lifelong farm exposure may strongly reduce the risk of asthma in adults. Allergy. 2007;62(10):1158–65. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01490.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. House JS, Wyss AB, Hoppin JA, et al. Early-life farm exposures and adult asthma and atopy in the Agricultural Lung Health Study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;140(1):249–56.e14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2016.09.036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Carnes MU, Hoppin JA, Metwali N, et al. House Dust Endotoxin Levels Are Associated with Adult Asthma in a U.S. Farming Population. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017;14(3):324–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201611-861OC.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Eduard W, Douwes J, Omenaas E, Heederik D. Do farming exposures cause or prevent asthma? Results from a study of adult Norwegian farmers. Thorax. 2004;59(5):381–6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.2004.013326.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Eduard W, Omenaas E, Bakke PS, Douwes J, Heederik D. Atopic and non-atopic asthma in a farming and a general population. Am J Ind Med. 2004;46(4):396–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.20088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Rennie DC, Karunanayake CP, Chen Y, et al. Early farm residency and prevalence of asthma and hay fever in adults. J Asthma. 2016;53(1):2–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/02770903.2015.1058394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hoppin JA, Umbach DM, London SJ, et al. Pesticides and atopic and nonatopic asthma among farm women in the Agricultural Health Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;177(1):11–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200706-821OC.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kogevinas M, Zock J-P, Jarvis D, et al. Exposure to substances in the workplace and new-onset asthma: an international prospective population-based study (ECRHS-II). Lancet. 2007;370(9584):336–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61164-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Karjalainen A, Kurppa K, Martikainen R, Klaukka T, Karjalainen J. Work is related to a substantial portion of adult-onset asthma incidence in the Finnish population. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;164(4):565–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.164.4.2012146.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Omland Ø, Hjort C, Pedersen OF, Miller MR, Sigsgaard T. New-onset asthma and the effect of environment and occupation among farming and nonfarming rural subjects. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;128(4):761–5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2011.06.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Alavanja MC, Sandler DP, McMaster SB, et al. The Agricultural Health Study. Environ Health Perspect. 1996;104(4):362–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Wyss AB, Sofer T, Lee MK, et al. Multiethnic meta-analysis identifies ancestry-specific and cross-ancestry loci for pulmonary function. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):2976. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05369-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Genome Variation Server. Accessed October 18. 2019. https://gvs.gs.washington.edu/GVS150/HelpBuildNotes.jsp.

  48. Dweik RA, Boggs PB, Erzurum SC, et al. American Thoracic Society Documents An Official ATS Clinical Practice Guideline: Interpretation of Exhaled Nitric Oxide Levels (FeNO) for Clinical Applications. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184:602–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Juniper EF, Bousquet J, Abetz L, Bateman ED, GOAL Committee. Identifying “well-controlled” and “not well-controlled” asthma using the Asthma Control Questionnaire. Respir Med. 2006;100(4):616–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2005.08.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Lee MK, Wyss AB, Carnes MU, et al. House dust microbiota in relation to adult asthma and atopy in a US farming population. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021;147(3):910–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2020.06.013.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Global Initiative for Asthma. Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention.; 2020. Accessed March 9, 2021. www.ginasthma.org.

  52. Barrett JC, Fry B, Maller J, Daly MJ. Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(2):263–5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bth457.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Cheng D, Di H, Xue Z, Zhen G. CC16 gene A38G polymorphism and susceptibility to asthma: an updated meta-analysis. Intern Med. 2015;54(2):155–62. doi:https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.54.2979.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Mansur AH, Fryer AA, Hepple M, Strange RC, Spiteri MA. An association study between the Clara cell secretory protein CC16 A38G polymorphism and asthma phenotypes. Clin Exp Allergy. 2002;32(7):994–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Kalyoncu AF, Karakaya G, Yilmaz E, Balci B, Karaduman A, Yasavul U. Analgesic intolerance with or without bronchial asthma: is there a marker? J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2003;13(3):162–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Sharma S, Ghosh B. Association of an intragenic microsatellite marker in the CC16 gene with asthma in the Indian population. J Hum Genet. 2004;49(12):677–83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10038-004-0206-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Candelaria PV, Backer V, Laing IA, et al. Association between asthma-related phenotypes and the CC16 A38G polymorphism in an unselected population of young adult Danes. Immunogenetics. 2005;57(1–2):25–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00251-005-0778-2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Zhang G, Khoo S-K, Laatikainen T, et al. Opposite gene by environment interactions in Karelia for CD14 and CC16 single nucleotide polymorphisms and allergy. Allergy. 2009;64(9):1333–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.02006.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Saadat M, Saadat I, Saboori Z, Emad A. Combination of CC16, GSTM1, and GSTT1 genetic polymorphisms is associated with asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;113(5):996–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Ku M-S, Sun H-L, Lu K-H, et al. The CC16 A38G polymorphism is associated with the development of asthma in children with allergic rhinitis. Clin Exp Allergy. 2011;41(6):794–800. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2222.2010.03679.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Nauwelaerts SJD, Roosens NHC, De Cremer K, Bernard A, De Keersmaecker SCJ. Gender-dependent association between exhaled nitric oxide and the CC16 38AA genotype in young school children. Immun Inflamm Dis. 2020;8(4):497–505. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/iid3.332.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Sengler C, Heinzmann A, Jerkic S-P, et al. Clara cell protein 16 (CC16) gene polymorphism influences the degree of airway responsiveness in asthmatic children. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;111(3):515–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Shijubo N, Itoh Y, Yamaguchi T, et al. Serum Levels of Clara Cell 10-kDa Protein Are Decreased in Patients with Asthma. Lung. 1999;177(1):45–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00007626.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Guerra S, Vasquez MM, Spangenberg A, Halonen M, Martin RJ. Club cell secretory protein in serum and bronchoalveolar lavage of patients with asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;138(3):932–4.e1. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2016.03.047.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Kaminsky DA, Irvin CG. What long-term changes in lung function can tell us about asthma control. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2015;15(3):505. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11882-014-0505-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health. Specifically, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) (Z01-ES049030, ZIA-ES102385-12, and for AW contract HHSN273201600003I) and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) (Z01-CP010119). This work was also supported in part by American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) funds through NIEHS contract number NO1-ES-55546. Lastly, this work was supported by the Kuhl Grant, Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE. The study funders did not have a role in study design, data collection, data analysis, interpretation, writing of the report, or in the decision to submit for publication.

JAP receives funding from the Department of Defense (#PR200793) and National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (R01OH012045, U54OH010162). JAP has received research support from AstraZeneca (no monies) and is involved in clinical research studies with Takeda and GlaxoSmithKline, all unrelated to this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Epidemiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 68198, Omaha, NE, USA

    KC Gribben, PA Farazi & TD LeVan

  2. Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA

    AB Wyss & SJ London

  3. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Allergy and Immunology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 68198, Omaha, NE, USA

    JA Poole

  4. Department of Biostatistics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 68198, Omaha, NE, USA

    C Wichman

  5. Westat, Durham, NC, USA

    M Richards-Barber

  6. Biostatistics and Computational Biology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA

    DM Umbach

  7. Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA

    LE Beane Freeman

  8. Respiratory Health Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Morgantown, WV, USA

    PK Henneberger

  9. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 68198, Omaha, NE, USA

    TD LeVan

Authors
  1. KC Gribben
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. AB Wyss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. JA Poole
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. PA Farazi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. C Wichman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. M Richards-Barber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. LE Beane Freeman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. PK Henneberger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. DM Umbach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. SJ London
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. TD LeVan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

KG formally requested the data, performed all analyses, prepared and revised manuscript for publication. TL provided expert oversight and review of the project proposal including research questions, the data request, review of results, and provided feedback on manuscript drafts. AW and MRB prepared and provided analytical dataset and critically reviewed and provided feedback on manuscript drafts, SL is PI of the ALHS, reviewed and provided critical feedback on project proposal including research questions, data request, and manuscript drafts. JP, PAF, CW, LBF, PH, and DU each provided substantative feedback and editing on manuscript drafts. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowlegements.

The authors want to acknowledge Jianping Jin, PhD, Westat, Durham, NC, and Frank Day, PhD, NIEHS for expert computational assistance.

Disclaimer.

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to TD LeVan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC) Institutional Review Board (IRB) determined this project involving secondary data analysis did not constitute human subjects research and was exempt from further review/approval was waived (IRB Protocol: 014-20-EX). This study was also approved by the IRB at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication -

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original version of the article was revised: The first author was duplicated as last author; It has been corrected.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gribben, K., Wyss, A., Poole, J. et al. CC16 polymorphisms in asthma, asthma subtypes, and asthma control in adults from the Agricultural Lung Health Study. Respir Res 23, 305 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-022-02211-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-022-02211-6

Keywords

Respiratory Research

ISSN: 1465-993X

Contact us