Skip to main content
Download PDF

The impact of fluid status and decremental PEEP strategy on cardiac function and lung and kidney damage in mild-moderate experimental acute respiratory distress syndrome

Respiratory Research volume 22, Article number: 214 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

We evaluated the effects of abrupt versus gradual PEEP decrease, combined with standard versus high-volume fluid administration, on cardiac function, as well as lung and kidney damage in an established model of mild-moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

Methods

Wistar rats received endotoxin intratracheally. After 24 h, they were treated with Ringer’s lactate at standard (10 mL/kg/h) or high (30 mL/kg/h) dose. For 30 min, all animals were mechanically ventilated with tidal volume = 6 mL/kg and PEEP = 9 cmH2O (to keep alveoli open), then randomized to undergo abrupt or gradual (0.2 cmH2O/min for 30 min) PEEP decrease from 9 to 3 cmH2O. Animals were then further ventilated for 10 min at PEEP = 3 cmH2O, euthanized, and their lungs and kidneys removed for molecular biology analysis.

Results

At the end of the experiment, left and right ventricular end-diastolic areas were greater in animals treated with high compared to standard fluid administration, regardless of PEEP decrease rate. However, pulmonary arterial pressure, indicated by the pulmonary acceleration time (PAT)/pulmonary ejection time (PET) ratio, was higher in abrupt compared to gradual PEEP decrease, independent of fluid status. Animals treated with high fluids and abrupt PEEP decrease exhibited greater diffuse alveolar damage and higher expression of interleukin-6 (a pro-inflammatory marker) and vascular endothelial growth factor (a marker of endothelial cell damage) compared to the other groups. The combination of standard fluid administration and gradual PEEP decrease increased zonula occludens-1 expression, suggesting epithelial cell preservation. Expression of club cell-16 protein, an alveolar epithelial cell damage marker, was higher in abrupt compared to gradual PEEP decrease groups, regardless of fluid status. Acute kidney injury score and gene expression of kidney injury molecule-1 were higher in the high versus standard fluid administration groups, regardless of PEEP decrease rate.

Conclusion

In the ARDS model used herein, decreasing PEEP abruptly increased pulmonary arterial hypertension, independent of fluid status. The combination of abrupt PEEP decrease and high fluid administration led to greater lung and kidney damage. This information adds to the growing body of evidence that supports gradual transitioning of ventilatory patterns and warrants directing additional investigative effort into vascular and deflation issues that impact lung protection.

Background

Lung-protective strategies aimed at preventing ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) have focused strictly on the regulation of airspace pressures, excursions, and frequencies [1]. By comparison, events affecting the opposite (vascular) side of the gas-exchanging membrane have been relatively neglected [1]. Yet, there is ample reason to conclude that events within the gas and vascular spaces interact in VILI pathogenesis. Convincing experimental evidence indicates that microvascular pressures and flows strongly influence lung edema and VILI expression [2, 3]. Moreover, fluid balance, a presumed correlate of vessel filling, relates directly to clinical outcomes for as yet incompletely defined reasons [4]. As noted in previous work by our group [5, 6], the rates at which ventilatory interventions are imposed or withdrawn may also contribute to VILI risk. Gradual increases in tidal volume (VT) [7] PEEP [8] and recruiting pressures [9, 10] appear to be better tolerated than sudden ones, presumably by allowing a more beneficial distribution of stress and strain. On the deflation side, data gathered in recent years from small-animal models with previously healthy lungs demonstrate the adverse influence of abruptly releasing high levels of PEEP [11]. This observation has been attributed primarily to cardiovascular compromise owing to the initial “surge” of translocating fluid volumes from peripheral to central vascular compartments. In experimental acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS); however, alveoli have different time constants and lung tissue sensitivity to vascular volume and flows, due to atelectasis and edema. In theory, the lung may be influenced not only by deflation kinetics, but also by the pace of PEEP release.

Fluid administration, like any other treatment, might induce significant side effects in experimental ARDS. Experimental [12] and clinical [13] studies reported that reducing lung vascular hydrostatic pressures decreases lung edema in ARDS, likely due to favorable effects on Starling forces and attenuated lung inflammation [14]. Despite a considerable body of published evidence that implicates the importance of fluid volume status and ventilatory transitions in VILI and organ dysfunction, to our knowledge, the relative effects of abrupt as opposed to gradual release of PEEP on the lung, heart, and other vital organs have not been investigated. Thus, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of abrupt versus gradual PEEP release—combined with standard or high fluid volumes—on the cardiac function, as well as lung and kidney damage in an established animal model of ARDS.

Material and methods

Study approval

This study was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, with opinion number 122/18. All animals received humane care in compliance with the “Principles of Laboratory Animal Care” formulated by the National Society for Medical Research and the U.S. National Academy of Sciences Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Animals were housed at a controlled temperature (23 °C) and controlled light–dark cycle (12–12 h), with free access to water and food.

Animal preparation and experimental protocol

Thirty-five male Wistar rats (age 8–10 weeks, body weight 291 ± 75 g) were used. Rats were anesthetized by inhalation of 1.0% sevoflurane (Sevorane®; Cristália, Itapira, SP, Brazil) and received Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS: 9.6 × 106 EU/mL in 200 μL of saline solution) intratracheally (i.t.) to induce experimental acute respiratory distress syndrome [7] Twenty-four hours after ARDS induction, animals were premedicated intraperitoneally (i.p.) with 10 mg/kg diazepam (Compaz®, Cristália, Itapira, SP, Brazil), followed by 100 mg/kg ketamine (Ketamin-S®, Cristália, Itapira, SP, Brazil) and 2 mg/kg midazolam (Dormicum®, União Química, São Paulo, SP, Brazil). After local anesthesia with 2% lidocaine (0.4 mL), a midline neck incision and tracheostomy were performed. An intravenous (i.v.) catheter (Jelco 24G, Becton, Dickinson and Company, New Jersey, NJ, USA) was inserted into the tail vein, and anesthesia induced and maintained with midazolam (2 mg/kg/h) and ketamine (50 mg/kg/h). A second catheter (18G, Arrow International, USA) was then placed in the right internal carotid artery for blood sampling and gas analysis (Radiometer ABL80 FLEX, Copenhagen NV, Denmark), as well as monitoring of mean arterial pressure (MAP) (Networked Multiparameter Veterinary Monitor LifeWindow 6000V; Digicare Animal Health, Boynton Beach, FL, USA). Heart rate (HR), MAP, and rectal temperature were continuously monitored (Networked Multiparameter Veterinary Monitor LifeWindow 6000V, Digicare Animal Health, Florida, USA). Body temperature was maintained at 37.5 ± 1 °C using a heating bed. Animals in dorsal recumbency were paralyzed with pancuronium bromide (2 mg/kg, i.v.) and their lungs mechanically ventilated (V500; Dräger Medical, Lübeck, Germany) in volume-controlled mode (VCV) with constant inspiratory airflow, VT = 6 mL/kg, respiratory rate (RR) to maintain V′E = 160 mL/min, zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP), FiO2 = 1.0, and an inspiratory-expiratory ratio of 1:2 (BASELINE). Arterial blood gases and echocardiography were evaluated. PEEP was then progressively (over 5 min) increased to 9 cmH2O, while, at the same time, animals were randomized to receive a standard (10 mL/kg, NORMO) or high (30 mL/kg/h, HIGH) volume of Ringer’s lactate (B. Braun, Crissier, Switzerland) via continuous intravenous infusion until the end of the study. For 30 min, all animals were mechanically ventilated with tidal volume = 6 mL/kg and PEEP = 9 cmH2O (to keep alveoli open), then randomized to undergo abrupt or gradual (0.2 cmH2O/min for 30 min) PEEP decrease, from 9 to 3 cmH2O (Fig. 1). After this period, animals were further ventilated for 10 min at PEEP = 3 cmH2O. The PEEP levels of 3 and 9 cmH2O are often used in rats. Theoretical analyses have shown that PEEP levels in rats could be equivalent to double those in humans, according to the estimated transpulmonary pressure [13]. Therefore, the range of PEEP levels used in the current study was selected to resemble those used in mechanically ventilated critical-care patients (6–18  cmH2O). At the end of the experiment, arterial blood gases, echocardiography, and respiratory system mechanics were assessed (FINAL), and heparin (1000 IU) was injected into the tail vein. All animals were killed by overdose of sodium thiopental (60 mg/kg i.v.) and the trachea was then clamped at PEEP = 3 cmH2O. Lungs and kidney were then extracted for histology and molecular biology analysis. Seven animals received LPS intratracheally but were not mechanically ventilated [non-ventilated (NV) animals]; after 24 h, they were euthanized and had their lungs and one kidney removed for molecular biology analysis.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Protocol (A) and timeline representation of the experimental protocol (B). Arterial blood gases and echocardiography were evaluated at BASELINE and FINAL. BGA blood gas analysis; ECHO echocardiography; FDA functional data acquisition; FiO2 fraction of inspired oxygen; ZEEP zero end-expiratory pressure; PEEP positive end-expiratory pressure; VT tidal volume. Twenty-four hours after intratracheal administration of Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide, rats received standard (10 mL/kg/h, NORMO) or high (30 mL/kg/h, HIGH) volume of Ringer’s lactate. For 30 min, all rats, regardless of fluid status, were mechanically ventilated with VT = 6 mL/kg and PEEP = 9 cmH2O, and then randomized to the following groups: abrupt PEEP decrease from 9 to 3 cmH2O (FAST) or gradual PEEP decrease (0.2 cmH2O/min) from 9 to 3 cmH2O (SLOW) for 30 min

Full size image

Data acquisition and processing

Airflow and airway pressure were continuously recorded throughout the experiments [7, 15, 16]. VT, RR, and V′E were calculated. Respiratory system mechanics were assessed by occluding the airways at end-inspiration for 5 s until a respiratory system plateau pressure (Pplat,RS) was reached. Respiratory system driving pressure (∆P,RS) was calculated as the difference between Pplat,RS (post end-inspiratory pause) and PEEP. All signals were amplified in a four-channel signal conditioner (SC-24, SCIREQ, Montreal, QC, Canada), and sampled at 200 Hz with a 12-bit analog-to-digital converter (National Instruments; Austin, Texas, USA). Mechanical data were computed offline by a routine written in MATLAB (Version R2007a; The Mathworks Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, USA).

Transthoracic echocardiography

Shaved animals were placed in the dorsal recumbent position. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed by an expert (N.N.R.) blinded to group allocation, using an UGEO HM70A system (Samsung, São Paulo, Brazil) equipped with a linear phased-array probe (8–13 MHz). Images were obtained from the subcostal and parasternal views. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed [17] and the following parameters analyzed: right ventricular (RV) area, left ventricular (LV) area, and right ventricular cardiac output (RVCO). Pulsed-wave Doppler was used to measure the ratio of pulmonary acceleration time (PAT, time from the onset of pulmonary flow to peak velocity by pulsed-wave Doppler recording) to pulmonary ejection time (PET, time interval between the onset and end of the systolic flow velocity), which is an indirect index of pulmonary arterial hypertension [18]. All parameters followed American Society of Echocardiography and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging recommendations [17].

Histology

Diffuse alveolar damage

The lungs and heart were removed en bloc. The left lung was frozen in liquid nitrogen and immersed in formaldehyde solution (4%), embedded in paraffin, cut longitudinally in the central zone by means of a microtome into three slices (each 4 μm thick), and stained with hematoxylin–eosin for histological analysis [7, 15]. Photomicrographs at magnifications of × 100, × 200, and × 400 were obtained from eight non-overlapping fields of view per section using a light microscope (Olympus BX51, Olympus Latin America Inc., Brazil). Diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) was quantified using a weighted scoring system by two investigators (M.V. and V.L.C.) blinded to group assignment, working independently, as described elsewhere [19]. Briefly, scores of 0–4 were used to represent interstitial edema, overdistension, alveolar collapse, septal inflammation, and alveolar hemorrhage, with 0 standing for no effect and 4 for maximum severity. Additionally, the extent of each scored characteristic per field of view was determined on a scale of 0–4, with 0 standing for no visible evidence and 4 for complete involvement. Scores were calculated as the product of severity and extent of each feature, on a range of 0–16. The cumulative DAD score was calculated as the sum of each score characteristic and ranged from 0 to 80, as described elsewhere [19].

Acute kidney injury score

Kidney slices were stained with hematoxylin–eosin and periodic acid–Schiff and observed under light microscopy for qualitative and quantitative analysis. Semiquantitative data were obtained from high-resolution photomicrographs. Fifteen non-overlapping images of tubular tissue (cortex and outer medulla) were randomly obtained with a × 40 objective lens from each kidney section (n = 8/group) stained with H&E and PAS (tubular profiles). Histological findings were graded from 0 to 4 (0, no change; 1, changes affecting 25% of the field of view; 2, changes affecting 25–50%; 3, changes affecting 51–75%, and 4, changes affecting > 75% of the field), according to the area affected by the features of interest (edema, tubular cell vacuolization, deranged brush border in proximal tubular epithelia, tubular cell death/desquamation, and inflammation). The final kidney injury score in each rat was expressed as the sum of all values of all features obtained and ranged from 0 to 20 [20].

Transmission electron microscopy

Three slices (2 × 2 × 2 mm) were cut from three different segments of the left lung and fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde for electron microscopy. On each lung electron microscopy image (20 fields per animal), degree of interstitial edema, damage to basement membrane, extracellular matrix damage, type II epithelial cell damage, and endothelial cell damage were graded on a five-point, semiquantitative, severity-based scoring system as follows: 0 = normal lung parenchyma, 1–4 = changes in 1–25%, 26–50%, 51–75%, and 76–100% of examined tissue, respectively [21]. All histological analyses were performed in a blinded manner.

Biological markers

Quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was used. In lung tissue, gene expression of biomarkers associated with inflammation (interleukin [IL]-6), tight junction (zona occludens [ZO]-1), epithelial cell damage (club cell secretory protein 16, CC16), extracellular matrix damage (versican and syndecan-1), and endothelial cell damage (vascular endothelial growth factor, VEGF) were measured. In kidney tissue, gene expressions of biomarkers associated with renal injury (kidney injury molecule [KIM]-1 and neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin, NGAL) and inflammation (IL-6) were evaluated. The primer sequences are listed in Additional file 1: Table S1. Central slices of the right lung and kidney were cut, flash-frozen by immersion in liquid nitrogen, and stored at − 80 °C. For each sample, the expression of each gene was normalized to the acidic ribosomal phosphoprotein P0 (36B4) housekeeping gene [22] and expressed as fold change relative to NV group, using the 2−∆∆Ct method, where ΔCt = Ct (target gene) – Ct (reference gene) [23].

Statistical analysis

Sample size was calculated on the basis of pilot studies, which detected differences in IL-6 between abrupt and gradual PEEP decrease under high fluid administration. A sample size of 7 rats per group would provide the appropriate power (1 − β = 0.8) to identify significant differences in IL-6 expression, taking into account the effect size d = 2.0, a two-sided t test, and a sample size ratio of 1 (G*Power 3.1.9.2., University of Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany). Normality and equality of variance were evaluated by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test with Lilliefors’ correction and Levene’s median test, respectively. Two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test was used to compare abrupt and gradual PEEP release under standard and high fluid volume conditions. Parametric data were expressed as mean ± SD, while nonparametric data were expressed as median (interquartile range). All tests were carried out in GraphPad Prism 8.00 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). Significance was established at p < 0.05.

Results

No mortality was observed in any group during the experiments. At FINAL, the mean volumes of fluids injected were 6.9 ± 2.5 mL in the group treated with standard fluid administration (NORMO) with abrupt PEEP decrease (FAST), 16.1 ± 7.2 mL in the high fluid administration (HIGH) with abrupt PEEP decrease group, 6.0 ± 1.5 mL in the standard fluid administration with gradual PEEP decrease (SLOW) group, and 15.4 ± 1.9 mL in high fluid administration with gradual PEEP decrease group.

At BASELINE, echocardiographic parameters did not differ among groups. At FINAL, high fluid administration resulted in increased LV and RV areas, as well as RVCO, regardless of velocity of PEEP decrease (Table 1). Compared to gradual PEEP decrease, abrupt deflation reduced PAT/PET independent of fluid status, suggesting higher pulmonary arterial pressures (Additional file 2: Fig. S1). Heart rate did not differ between groups, and mean arterial pressure remained above 70 mmHg throughout the experiments.

Table 1 Echocardiographic parameters at ZEEP (BASELINE), after PEEP = 9 cmH2O, and at FINAL
Full size table

Arterial blood gases did not differ at BASELINE, suggesting similar degrees of lung damage. Oxygenation improved both at PEEP of 9 cmH2O and at FINAL, whereas PaCO2 was higher in FINAL compared to BASELINE. At FINAL, pHa, PaO2, PaCO2, and HCO3− did not differ among groups (Table 2).

Table 2 Arterial blood gases at ZEEP (BASELINE), after PEEP = 9 cmH2O and at FINAL
Full size table

At FINAL, VT, RR, V′E, and Ti/Ttot (Table 3) did not differ between groups. In animals treated with high fluid administration, Pplat,RS and ∆P,RS were higher in FAST compared to NORMO groups (Table 3). In the presence of standard fluid administration, no significant differences were observed in Pplat,RS or ∆P,RS between FAST and NORMO groups.

Table 3 Respiratory parameters at FINAL
Full size table

In animals treated with abrupt PEEP deflation, high fluid compared to standard fluid administration resulted in increased DAD score due to less interstitial edema, overdistension, and alveolar hemorrhage (Fig. 2). Abrupt compared with gradual PEEP deflation, when combined with high fluid administration, was associated with high DAD score due to reduced interstitial edema, overdistension, septal inflammation. No significant differences were observed in the degree of alveolar collapse among groups. Ultrastructural analysis of lung parenchyma showed greater interstitial edema in HIGH compared to NORMO animals, independent of PEEP decrease rate. Basement membrane injury, extracellular matrix damage, type II epithelial dell damage, and endothelial cell damage scores were greater in the FAST groups than in the SLOW groups, regardless of fluid status (Additional file 3: Table S2 and Fig. S2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

A representative photomicrographs (light microscopy) of lung parenchyma stained with hematoxylin–eosin. Photomicrographs are representative of data obtained from lung sections of 7 animals (original magnification, × 400). Bars = 100 μm. Note the presence of interstitial edema (asterisk), lung overdistension (double arrows), and alveolar-capillary damage (presence of neutrophils and erythrocytes in the alveolar septa) (two arrows). B diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) score; scores arithmetically averaged from two independent investigators representing injury from interstitial edema, overdistension, alveolar collapse, septal inflammation, and alveolar hemorrhage. Boxes show the interquartile (25–75%) range, whiskers encompass the range (minimum to maximum), and horizontal lines represent median values of seven animals/group. Rats received a standard (10 mL/kg/h, NORMO) or high (30 mL/kg/h, HIGH) volume of Ringer’s lactate. FAST: abrupt PEEP decrease from 9 to 3 cmH2O; SLOW: gradual PEEP decrease (0.2 cmH2O/min) from 9 to 3 cmH2O

Full size image

The combination of abrupt PEEP decrease and high fluid administration led to increased gene expressions of IL-6, versican, syndecan-1, and VEGF. Under high fluid conditions, gradual PEEP decrease resulted in reduced IL-6 and VEGF. Gene expression of ZO-1 was greater in the group treated with standard fluid administration plus gradual PEEP decrease compared to other groups, suggesting epithelial cell preservation. CC-16 was overexpressed in the abrupt PEEP decrease groups, regardless of fluid status (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Expression of biomarkers associated with inflammation [interleukin (IL)-6], tight junctions [zonula occludens (ZO)-1], epithelial cell damage [club cell protein (CC)-16], extracellular matrix remodeling (versican, syndecan-1), and endothelial cell damage [(vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)]. Relative gene expression was calculated as a ratio of the average gene expression levels compared with the reference gene (acidic ribosomal phosphoprotein P0, 36B4) and expressed as fold change relative to non-ventilated animals (NV). Boxes show the interquartile (25–75%) range, whiskers encompass the range (minimum to maximum), and horizontal lines represent median values of 7 animals/group. Rats received a standard (10 mL/kg/h, NORMO) or high (30 mL/kg/h, HIGH) volume of Ringer’s lactate. FAST: abrupt PEEP decrease from 9 to 3 cmH2O; SLOW: gradual PEEP decrease (0.2 cmH2O/min) from 9 to 3 cmH2O

Full size image

High fluid administration was associated with higher kidney damage score (Fig. 4) and IL-6 expression (Fig. 5), independent of the rate of PEEP decrease. After abrupt PEEP decrease, interstitial edema, tubular cell vacuolization, brush border derangement in proximal tubular epithelia, and tubular cell desquamation (Fig. 4), as well as KIM-1, NGAL, and IL-6 gene expressions, were higher in the HIGH than in the NORMO animals (Fig. 5). In the gradual PEEP decrease groups, KIM-1 expression was greater in HIGH than in NORMO.

Fig. 4
figure 4

A representative photomicrographs (light microscopy) of kidney parenchyma stained with hematoxylin–eosin. Photomicrographs are representative of data obtained from kidney sections of 7 animals (original magnification, × 400). Bars = 100 μm. Note the presence of interstitial edema (asterisk), brush border lesion (two arrows), and cellular desquamation (one arrow). B kidney injury score; scores arithmetically averaged from two independent investigators representing injury from interstitial edema, vacuolization, brush border lesion, desquamation, and inflammation are shown. Boxes show the interquartile (25–75%) range, whiskers encompass the range (minimum to maximum), and horizontal lines represent median values of 7 animals/group

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

Expression of biomarkers associated with renal tubular epithelial cell damage [kidney injury molecule (KIM)-1 and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL)] and inflammation [interleukin (IL)-6]. Relative gene expression was calculated as a ratio of the average gene expression levels compared with the reference gene (acidic ribosomal phosphoprotein P0, 36B4) and expressed as fold change relative to non-ventilated animals (NV). Boxes show the interquartile (25–75%) range, whiskers encompass the range (minimum to maximum), and horizontal lines represent median values of 7 animals/group. Rats received a standard (10 mL/kg/h, NORMO) or high (30 mL/kg/h, HIGH) volume of Ringer’s lactate. FAST: abrupt PEEP decrease from 9 to 3 cmH2O; SLOW: gradual PEEP decrease (0.2 cmH2O/min) from 9 to 3 cmH2O

Full size image

Discussion

In the model of mild-moderate ARDS used herein, we found that animals treated with high fluids and abrupt PEEP decrease exhibited greater diffuse alveolar damage and higher expression of genes associated with lung inflammation and endothelial cell damage compared to the other groups. Abrupt PEEP reduction, regardless of fluid status, led to greater epithelial cell damage and pulmonary arterial pressure (as indicated by the PAT/PET ratio). Standard fluid administration combined with gradual PEEP reduction better preserved alveolar epithelial cells. Acute kidney injury score and gene expression of kidney injury molecule-1 was higher in high compared to standard fluid administration, during both abrupt and gradual PEEP decrease.

Experimental ARDS induced by intratracheal instillation of endotoxin (first hit) [24] resulted in changes in lung mechanics and histology that resembled human ARDS and is in agreement with the American Thoracic Society committee recommendations [24]. Therefore, the definition of mild, moderate and severe ARDS was assigned based on morphological and functional changes and not designated according to PaO2/FiO2 at PEEP level ≥ 5 cmH2O.

Animals were then randomized to receive different mechanical ventilation strategies and fluids as a second hit. Among the crystalloids, Ringer’s lactate was chosen since it avoids the hyperchloremic acidosis that predictably accompanies the use of saline [25]. The high rate of fluid infusion was based on previous pilot studies in animals with endotoxin-induced lung injury treated with different mechanical ventilation strategies, as well as standard and high-volume fluid administration. In this line, the fluid volumes of 7 mL versus 16 mL at FINAL kept MAP above 70 mmHg in our rats. The relative volume of fluids administered in rats differs from humans due to differences in lung pulmonary vessels (anatomy, size, and number). The initial PEEP level (9 cmH2O) was sufficient to keep the lungs fully open [15] and the animals alive for 1 h. Moreover, this PEEP level resembles that used in mechanically ventilated critical care patients (18 cmH2O), taking into account differences in transpulmonary pressures between humans and rats [26].

We abruptly decreased PEEP level across a pressure range that paralleled, but did not match, that of a previous study in rabbits [11]. Such decompressions may happen in practice during aggressive weaning or during accidental or intentional mechanical ventilator disconnection. PEEP = 9 cmH2O was applied for 30 min since, as based on previous pilot studies, it opens alveoli and keeps them homogeneously open. Moreover, 30 min is the minimum time needed to modify gene expression of the biomarkers of interest [26]. The lung tissue biomarkers measured in this study are indicative of increased inflammation (IL-6) [27], extracellular matrix damage (versican, syndecan) [28], endothelial cell injury (VEGF) [29], and tight junction integrity (ZO-1) [30]. The selected kidney biomarkers (KIM-1 and NGAL) are associated with renal proximal tubular injury [31] and severity of kidney disease [32].

The linkage of excessive strain, inflation energy, and cycling frequency with VILI is rather well established [6]. However, the parenchyma also absorbs some of the potential energy stored at end-inspiration, experiencing additional strains during the early part of deflation as the lung refolds and rearranges into its (proto-inspiratory) position. Experimental and clinical evidence provided by several groups suggests that slowing early expiration and regulating expiratory flow may reduce lung injury [33, 34]. While the exact mechanism underlying these intriguing and consistent observations remains obscure, the tacit inference has been that the explanation would center on the magnitude and distribution of the released parenchymal energy. That tissue energy load may influence both the airspace and vascular compartments.

Like the expiratory portion of the tidal cycle, the influence of vascular events has received relatively little consideration. The potential for very high capillary pressures and flows to cause stress fractures of the alveolar-capillary barrier provides a compelling explanation for the parenchymal hemorrhage that accompanies certain forms of cardiogenic pulmonary edema and the high cardiac output conditions of extreme athletic stress. A series of prior studies from one of our own groups demonstrated that the presence of high microvascular pressure gradients and flows may be an essential determinant of overt VILI expression for lungs ventilated with identical airspace and left atrial (pulmonary venous) pressures [2, 3]. The clear structural damage and endothelial damage that occurs in that setting may theoretically result (at least in part) from unmeasured shearing forces and energy released by blood flowing through a compressed and restricted vascular bed. Here, we showed that gradually decreasing the PEEP level promotes lung and kidney protection. We may infer that abruptly decreasing PEEP through a wide range may lead to profound hemodynamic changes as blood shifts from peripheral toward central vessels. If so, pulmonary endothelial cells and extracellular matrix are likely subjected to major biophysical challenges, such as supraphysiological levels of shear stress [35]. Endothelial cells have a variety of receptors, which sense flow and transmit mechanical signals through mechanosensitive signaling pathways to recipient molecules that lead to phenotypic and functional changes [36]. IL-6, versican, syndecan, and VEGF gene expressions in these experiments corroborate this hypothesis. VEGF, in conjunction with its receptor VEGFR2, has been shown to participate in the transmission of forces to intercellular junction protein complexes (VE-cadherin, β-catenin, and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase to phosphorylate Akt and PECAM-1) [29]. On the other hand, the most protective strategy, namely NORMO-SLOW, led to high expression of ZO-1, which enhances endothelial bonding, preventing plasma leakage from vascular to alveolar spaces. Alternatively, altered perfusion might, in concept, influence the mechanical properties of the parenchyma sufficiently to accentuate micromechanical stresses during either half of the tidal cycle.

Data from the present study indicate that increased lung tissue damage results from an abrupt rather than a gradual PEEP release in the presence of an increased rate of fluid infusion. Abrupt transitioning caused the lung to exhibit histologic and molecular evidence of inflammation and endothelial trauma, which was not explained by the left ventricular loading mismatch reported by Katira et al. [11]. The differences between our findings may be related to the duration of high PEEP application, the nature of the model (healthy rabbits vs. pre-injured rats), or the magnitude of the sudden release to ZEEP (vs. 3 cmH2O). Rather, in our study the lung and right ventricle were adversely affected, whereas the echocardiographic ejection pattern of the left ventricle was not. Fluid loading produced the expected changes of tissue edema but affected the nature or severity of lung injury only inconsistently.

It should be noted that the mean airway pressures in the animals treated with a gradual PEEP decrease were somewhat higher than those in the abrupt PEEP decrease groups because of the intentional lingering of PEEP above the baseline value. One possibility to consider is that gradual decline may have promoted stress adaptation and a more even distribution of parenchymal strain. Simultaneously, however, a higher mean airway pressure resulted in lung overdistension which may increase pulmonary arterial pressure, with the potential to adversely affect the right ventricle—the opposite of our actual findings. The validity of such speculations regarding benefit of slower PEEP release, however, remains untested.

Kidney damage caused by endotoxin [20] is particularly sensitive to venous congestion. In this context, fluid overload can result in severe and sustained kidney injury [37]. In the model used for the present study, acute kidney injury score and gene expression of kidney injury molecule-1 were greater in HIGH than in NORMO fluid groups regardless of whether PEEP decrease was abrupt or gradual. One possibility is that differences in mechanotransduction induced by abrupt or gradual PEEP removal may yield less kidney damage than fluid increase itself. In fact, high rates of Ringer’s lactate administration appear to potentiate kidney damage by an as yet unconfirmed mechanism [38].

Possible clinical implications

In ARDS, the combination of high PEEP and low tidal volume has been associated with reduced venous return, cardiac output, and pulmonary capillary inflow, while simultaneously increasing extravascular pressure. Consequently, lung edema may decline even in the presence of alveolar capillary damage [39]. During PEEP removal, hemodynamic instability and increased edema may occur, often presenting a challenge to correct management of the amount of fluids to be administered. According to the results of the present study: (1) PEEP should be reduced gradually, regardless of the amount of fluid administered, to avoid increasing pulmonary arterial hypertension; (2) Abrupt PEEP decreases in conjunction with high fluid therapy may promote lung inflammation and vascular damage; (3) Gradually reducing PEEP and administering conservative fluid volumes helps preserve the epithelium from further damage; and (4) To prevent kidney damage, liberal fluid administration should be avoided, regardless of the velocity of PEEP deflation. Data from rodent experiments afford only mechanistic insights into VILI and cannot be directly applied to clinical settings without reservation. Even though abrupt deflation (from 9 to 3 cmH2O in rats, approximating 18–6 cmH2O in humans) does not occur commonly in clinical practice, these data provide a proof of concept that VILI is influenced by interaction between the pace of PEEP decrease and the amount of fluids administered.

Limitations

Some limitations of the present study must be acknowledged. Experiments were conducted in a small-animal model of mild-moderate ARDS and tested only one VT and minute ventilation. These findings apply to these specific experimental circumstances and time intervals. The selected PEEP levels chosen for the PEEP transition were selected arbitrarily; 9 cmH2O approaches the upper limit of what rats can sustain for the intended duration of these experiments without life-threatening hemodynamic compromise, whereas 3 cmH2O is a well-tolerated level that may afford some level of lung protection against ventilation stress. The observation time was 1 h in order to avoid hemodynamic impairment, which might have introduced bias into our study. Accordingly, we did not assess protein levels of biological markers. However, this duration of mechanical ventilation was sufficient for gene expression of key markers of interest and corresponds to that used in a previous study [15]. Moreover, 1 rat hour approximates 27 human hours [41]. Echocardiography was performed 10 min after deflation, and thus we cannot rule out that a right-to-left ventricular mismatch may have occurred during or immediately after PEEP reduction. At FINAL, respiratory acidosis was observed in all groups and may mitigate lung damage [5, 40]. However, all groups presented the same level of pH and PaCO2, which may have thus affected mediators similarly.

Conclusions

In the model of mild-moderate ARDS used herein, decreasing PEEP abruptly increased pulmonary arterial hypertension under background conditions of standard and high fluid administration. The combination of abrupt PEEP decrease and high fluid administration led to greater lung and kidney injury, inflammation, and endothelial cell damage. This information adds to the growing body of evidence that supports gradual transitioning of ventilatory patterns and warrants directing additional investigative effort into vascular and deflation issues that impact lung protection.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ARDS:

Acute respiratory distress syndrome

CC-16:

Club cell protein 16

DAD:

Diffuse alveolar damage

FiO2 :

Fraction of inspired oxygen

HR:

Heart rate

IL:

Interleukin

KIM:

Kidney injury molecule

LPS:

Lipopolysaccharide

LV:

Left ventricle

MAP:

Mean arterial pressure

NGAL:

Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin

NV:

Non-ventilated

PAT:

Pulmonary acceleration time

PEEP:

Positive end expiratory pressure

PET:

Pulmonary ejection time

Pplat,RS :

Respiratory system plateau pressure

RR:

Respiratory rate

RT-PCR:

Quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction

RV:

Right ventricle

RVCO:

Right ventricular cardiac output

Ti/Ttot:

Inspiratory time divided by duty cycle

V′E :

Minute ventilation

VCV:

Volume-controlled mode

VEGF:

Vascular endothelial growth factor

VILI:

Ventilator-induced lung injury

VT :

Tidal volume

ZEEP:

Zero end-expiratory pressure

ZO-1:

Zona occludens-1

ΔP,RS :

Respiratory system driving pressure

References

  1. Marini JJ, Gattinoni L. Protecting the ventilated lung: vascular surge and deflation energetics. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;198:1112–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Broccard AF, Hotchkiss JR, Kuwayama N, Olson DA, Jamal S, Wangensteen DO, Marini JJ. Consequences of vascular flow on lung injury induced by mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;157:1935–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hotchkiss JR Jr, Blanch L, Murias G, Adams AB, Olson DA, Wangensteen OD, Leo PH, Marini JJ. Effects of decreased respiratory frequency on ventilator-induced lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;161:463–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. van Mourik N, Metske HA, Hofstra JJ, Binnekade JM, Geerts BF, Schultz MJ, Vlaar APJ. Cumulative fluid balance predicts mortality and increases time on mechanical ventilation in ARDS patients: an observational cohort study. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0224563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rocco PRM, Marini JJ. What have we learned from animal models of ventilator-induced lung injury? Intensive Care Med. 2020;46:2377–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Marini JJ, Rocco PRM, Gattinoni L. Static and dynamic contributors to ventilator-induced lung injury in clinical practice. Pressure, energy, and power. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;201:767–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Felix NS, Samary CS, Cruz FF, Rocha NN, Fernandes MVS, Machado JA, Bose-Madureira RL, Capelozzi VL, Pelosi P, Silva PL, et al. Gradually increasing tidal volume may mitigate experimental lung injury in rats. Anesthesiology. 2019;130:767–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lim SC, Adams AB, Simonson DA, Dries DJ, Broccard AF, Hotchkiss JR, Marini JJ. Transient hemodynamic effects of recruitment maneuvers in three experimental models of acute lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:2378–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Silva PL, Moraes L, Santos RS, Samary C, Ornellas DS, Maron-Gutierrez T, Morales MM, Saddy F, Capelozzi VL, Pelosi P, et al. Impact of pressure profile and duration of recruitment maneuvers on morphofunctional and biochemical variables in experimental lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2011;39:1074–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Silva PL, Moraes L, Santos RS, Samary C, Ramos MB, Santos CL, Morales MM, Capelozzi VL, Garcia CS, de Abreu MG, et al. Recruitment maneuvers modulate epithelial and endothelial cell response according to acute lung injury etiology. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:e256-265.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Katira BH, Engelberts D, Otulakowski G, Giesinger RE, Yoshida T, Post M, Kuebler WM, Connelly KA, Kavanagh BP. Abrupt deflation after sustained inflation causes lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;198:1165–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Prewitt RM, McCarthy J, Wood LD. Treatment of acute low pressure pulmonary edema in dogs: relative effects of hydrostatic and oncotic pressure, nitroprusside, and positive end-expiratory pressure. J Clin Invest. 1981;67:409–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wiedemann HP, Wheeler AP, Bernard GR, Thompson BT, Hayden D, deBoisblanc B, Connors AF Jr, Hite RD, Harabin AL. Comparison of two fluid-management strategies in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:2564–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kuebler WM, Ying X, Singh B, Issekutz AC, Bhattacharya J. Pressure is proinflammatory in lung venular capillaries. J Clin Invest. 1999;104:495–502.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Samary CS, Santos RS, Santos CL, Felix NS, Bentes M, Barboza T, Capelozzi VL, Morales MM, Garcia CS, Souza SA, et al. Biological impact of transpulmonary driving pressure in experimental acute respiratory distress syndrome. Anesthesiology. 2015;123:423–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Spieth PM, Silva PL, Garcia CS, Ornellas DS, Samary CS, Moraes L, Bentes M, Morales MM, Kasper M, Guldner A, et al. Modulation of stress versus time product during mechanical ventilation influences inflammation as well as alveolar epithelial and endothelial response in rats. Anesthesiology. 2015;122:106–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Goldstein SA, Kuznetsova T, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28:1-39 e14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Thibault HB, Kurtz B, Raher MJ, Shaik RS, Waxman A, Derumeaux G, Halpern EF, Bloch KD, Scherrer-Crosbie M. Noninvasive assessment of murine pulmonary arterial pressure: validation and application to models of pulmonary hypertension. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3:157–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Uhlig C, Silva PL, Ornellas D, Santos RS, Miranda PJ, Spieth PM, Kiss T, Kasper M, Wiedemann B, Koch T, et al. The effects of salbutamol on epithelial ion channels depend on the etiology of acute respiratory distress syndrome but not the route of administration. Respir Res. 2014;15:56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mendes RS, Oliveira MV, Padilha GA, Rocha NN, Santos CL, Maia LA, Fernandes MVS, Cruz FF, Olsen PC, Capelozzi VL, et al. Effects of crystalloid, hyper-oncotic albumin, and iso-oncotic albumin on lung and kidney damage in experimental acute lung injury. Respir Res. 2019;20:155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Silva PL, Cruz FF, Samary CDS, Moraes L, de Magalhaes RF, Fernandes MVS, Bose R, Pelegati VB, Carvalho HF, Capelozzi VL, et al. Biological response to time-controlled adaptive ventilation depends on acute respiratory distress syndrome etiology. Crit Care Med. 2018;46:e609–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Akamine R, Yamamoto T, Watanabe M, Yamazaki N, Kataoka M, Ishikawa M, Ooie T, Baba Y, Shinohara Y. Usefulness of the 5’ region of the cDNA encoding acidic ribosomal phosphoprotein P0 conserved among rats, mice, and humans as a standard probe for gene expression analysis in different tissues and animal species. J Biochem Biophys Methods. 2007;70:481–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat Protoc. 2008;3:1101–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Matute-Bello G, Downey G, Moore BB, Groshong SD, Matthay MA, Slutsky AS, Kuebler WM. An official American Thoracic Society workshop report: features and measurements of experimental acute lung injury in animals. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2011;44:725–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. O'Malley CM, Frumento RJ, Hardy MA, Benvenisty AI, Brentjens TE, Mercer JS, Bennett-Guerrero E. A randomized, double-blind comparison of lactated Ringer's solution and 0.9% NaCl during renal transplantation. Anesth Analg. 2005;100:1518–24, table of contents.

  26. Caironi P, Langer T, Carlesso E, Protti A, Gattinoni L. Time to generate ventilator-induced lung injury among mammals with healthy lungs: a unifying hypothesis. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37:1913–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cross LJ, Matthay MA. Biomarkers in acute lung injury: insights into the pathogenesis of acute lung injury. Crit Care Clin. 2011;27:355–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kang I, Chang MY, Wight TN, Frevert CW. Proteoglycans as immunomodulators of the innate immune response to lung infection. J Histochem Cytochem. 2018;66:241–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Fujiwara K, Masuda M, Osawa M, Kano Y, Katoh K. Is PECAM-1 a mechanoresponsive molecule? Cell Struct Funct. 2001;26:11–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Van Itallie CM, Fanning AS, Bridges A, Anderson JM. ZO-1 stabilizes the tight junction solute barrier through coupling to the perijunctional cytoskeleton. Mol Biol Cell. 2009;20:3930–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Han WK, Bailly V, Abichandani R, Thadhani R, Bonventre JV. Kidney Injury Molecule-1 (KIM-1): a novel biomarker for human renal proximal tubule injury. Kidney Int. 2002;62:237–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Khawaja S, Jafri L, Siddiqui I, Hashmi M, Ghani F. The utility of neutrophil gelatinase-associated Lipocalin (NGAL) as a marker of acute kidney injury (AKI) in critically ill patients. Biomark Res. 2019;7:4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Koutsoukou A, Pecchiari M. Expiratory flow-limitation in mechanically ventilated patients: a risk for ventilator-induced lung injury? World J Crit Care Med. 2019;8:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Schmidt J, Wenzel C, Spassov S, Borgmann S, Lin Z, Wollborn J, Weber J, Haberstroh J, Meckel S, Eiden S, et al. Flow-controlled ventilation attenuates lung injury in a porcine model of acute respiratory distress syndrome: a preclinical randomized controlled study. Crit Care Med. 2020;48:e241–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Davies PF. Hemodynamic shear stress and the endothelium in cardiovascular pathophysiology. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2009;6:16–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Chistiakov DA, Orekhov AN, Bobryshev YV. Effects of shear stress on endothelial cells: go with the flow. Acta Physiol. 2017;219:382–408.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Ding X, Cheng Z, Qian Q. Intravenous fluids and acute kidney injury. Blood Purif. 2017;43:163–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Silva PL, Cruz FF, Fujisaki LC, Oliveira GP, Samary CS, Ornellas DS, Maron-Gutierrez T, Rocha NN, Goldenberg R, Garcia CS, et al. Hypervolemia induces and potentiates lung damage after recruitment maneuver in a model of sepsis-induced acute lung injury. Crit Care. 2010;14:R114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zabner J, Angeli LS, Martinez RR, Sanchez de Leon R. The effects of graded administration of positive end expiratory pressure on the fluid filtration rate in isolated rabbit lungs, using normal lungs, hydrostatic oedema lungs and oleic acid induced oedema. Intensive Care Med. 1990;16:89–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Morales-Quinteros L, Camprubi-Rimblas M, Bringue J, Bos LD, Schultz MJ, Artigas A. The role of hypercapnia in acute respiratory failure. Intensive Care Med Exp. 2019;7:39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Agoston DV. How to translate time? The temporal aspect of human and rodent biology. Front Neurol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2017.00092.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors express their gratitude to Andre Benedito da Silva, B.Sc., Laboratory of Pulmonary Investigation, Carlos Chagas Filho Biophysics Institute, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, for animal care; Arlete Fernandes, B.Sc., Laboratory of Pulmonary Investigation, Carlos Chagas Filho Biophysics Institute, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, for her help with microscopy; Maíra Rezende Lima, M.Sc., Laboratory of Pulmonary Investigation, Carlos Chagas Filho Biophysics Institute, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, for her assistance in molecular biology analysis; Moira Elizabeth Shottler, B.A., Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, and Filippe Vasconcellos, B.A., São Paulo, Brazil, for their assistance in editing the manuscript; Ronir Raggio Luiz, Ph.D., Institute of Public Health Studies, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, for his help with statistics; and Dräger Medical, Lübeck, Germany, for technical support.

Funding

Supported by the Brazilian Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq; Brasília, Brazil), the Rio de Janeiro State Research Foundation (FAPERJ; Rio de Janeiro, Brazil), the São Paulo State Research Foundation (FAPESP; São Paulo, Brazil), the National Institute of Science and Technology for Regenerative Medicine (INCT-REGENERA; Rio de Janeiro, Brazil), and the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES; Brasília, Brazil).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Pulmonary Investigation, Carlos Chagas Filho Institute of Biophysics, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

    Nazareth N. Rocha, Cynthia S. Samary, Mariana A. Antunes, Milena V. Oliveira, Matheus R. Hemerly, Patrine S. Santos, Fernanda F. Cruz, Pedro L. Silva & Patricia R. M. Rocco

  2. Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Biomedical Institute, Niteroi, Brazil

    Nazareth N. Rocha

  3. Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

    Cynthia S. Samary

  4. Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

    Vera L. Capelozzi

  5. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Regions Hospital, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA

    John J. Marini

  6. Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy

    Paolo Pelosi

  7. San Martino Policlinico Hospital, IRCCS for Oncology and Neurosciences, Genoa, Italy

    Paolo Pelosi

  8. Laboratory of Pulmonary Investigation, Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Avenida Carlos Chagas Filho, s/n, Bloco G-014, Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 21941-902, Brazil

    Patricia R. M. Rocco

Authors
  1. Nazareth N. Rocha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cynthia S. Samary
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mariana A. Antunes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Milena V. Oliveira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Matheus R. Hemerly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Patrine S. Santos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Vera L. Capelozzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Fernanda F. Cruz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. John J. Marini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Pedro L. Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Paolo Pelosi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Patricia R. M. Rocco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

NNR, PLS, JJM, PP, PRMR participated in the design of the study, performed data analyses, and wrote the manuscript; CSS, MAA, MVO, PSS, VLC, and FFC performed the analyses. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricia R. M. Rocco.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (CEUA: 122/18).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

None reported.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Forward and reverse oligonucleotide sequences of target gene primers.

Additional file 2: Figure S1.

Short-axis view of the left and right ventricles (upper panels) and pulmonary Doppler (lower panels).

Additional file 3: Table S2.

Semiquantitative analysis of lung electron microscopy. Figure S2. Transmission electron photomicrographs of lung parenchyma.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rocha, N.N., Samary, C.S., Antunes, M.A. et al. The impact of fluid status and decremental PEEP strategy on cardiac function and lung and kidney damage in mild-moderate experimental acute respiratory distress syndrome. Respir Res 22, 214 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-021-01811-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-021-01811-y

Keywords

Respiratory Research

ISSN: 1465-993X

Contact us