- Open Access
Effects of nano particles on antigen-related airway inflammation in mice
© Inoue et al. 2005
Received: 28 January 2005
Accepted: 16 September 2005
Published: 16 September 2005
Particulate matter (PM) can exacerbate allergic airway diseases. Although health effects of PM with a diameter of less than 100 nm have been focused, few studies have elucidated the correlation between the sizes of particles and aggravation of allergic diseases. We investigated the effects of nano particles with a diameter of 14 nm or 56 nm on antigen-related airway inflammation.
ICR mice were divided into six experimental groups. Vehicle, two sizes of carbon nano particles, ovalbumin (OVA), and OVA + nano particles were administered intratracheally. Cellular profile of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, lung histology, expression of cytokines, chemokines, and 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), and immunoglobulin production were studied.
Nano particles with a diameter of 14 nm or 56 nm aggravated antigen-related airway inflammation characterized by infiltration of eosinophils, neutrophils, and mononuclear cells, and by an increase in the number of goblet cells in the bronchial epithelium. Nano particles with antigen increased protein levels of interleukin (IL)-5, IL-6, and IL-13, eotaxin, macrophage chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1, and regulated on activation and normal T cells expressed and secreted (RANTES) in the lung as compared with antigen alone. The formation of 8-OHdG, a proper marker of oxidative stress, was moderately induced by nano particles or antigen alone, and was markedly enhanced by antigen plus nano particles as compared with nano particles or antigen alone. The aggravation was more prominent with 14 nm of nano particles than with 56 nm of particles in overall trend. Particles with a diameter of 14 nm exhibited adjuvant activity for total IgE and antigen-specific IgG1 and IgE.
Nano particles can aggravate antigen-related airway inflammation and immunoglobulin production, which is more prominent with smaller particles. The enhancement may be mediated, at least partly, by the increased local expression of IL-5 and eotaxin, and also by the modulated expression of IL-13, RANTES, MCP-1, and IL-6.
Previous epidemiological studies have indicated that long-term exposure to ambient particulate matter (PM) is linked to increases in mortality and morbidity related to respiratory diseases [1, 2]. The concentration of PM of mass median aerodynamic diameter (a density-dependent unit of measure used to describe the diameter of the particle) < or 10 μm (PM10) is related to daily hospital admissions for asthma, acute and chronic bronchiolitis, and lower respiratory tract infections . PM of mass median aerodynamic diameter < or 2.5 μm (PM2.5) are more closely associated with both acute and chronic respiratory effects and subsequent mortality than PM10 . Our laboratory has researched health effects of diesel exhaust particles (DEP), main constituents of PM2.5 in urban areas, especially in vivo. We have reported that DEP exacerbate allergic asthma  and acute lung injury related to bacterial infection in murine models .
Recently, nano particles, particles less than 0.1 μm in mass median aerodynamic diameter, have been implicated to affect cardiopulmonary systems [4, 7]. Indeed, two in vivo studies have demonstrated that nano particles induce prominent airway inflammation as compared with larger particles [8, 9]. Nano particles which have a larger surface area than the particles with larger size are able to penetrate deeply into the respiratory tract and cause a greater inflammatory response [10, 11].
Bronchial asthma has been recognized as chronic airway inflammation that is characterized by an increase in the number of activated lymphocytes and eosinophils. A number of studies have shown that various particles including carbon black (CB) can enhance allergic sensitization [12–14]. CB has been demonstrated to enhance proliferation of antibody forming cells and both IgE and IgG levels [15, 16]. Ultrafine particles (PM and CB) reportedly exaggerate allergic airway inflammation in vivo [17, 18]. However, all the studies have not described the size of particles they used. Therefore, no research has been addressed the size effects of particles or nano particles on allergic airway inflammation in vivo.
The aim of the present study was to elucidate the effects of two sizes of carbon nano particles (14 nm or 56 nm) on allergic airway inflammation, local expression of cytokines, chemokines, and 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), and production of total IgE and antigen-specific IgG1, IgG2a, and IgE.
Materials and methods
Male ICR mice 6 to 7 wk of age and weighing 29 to 33 g (Japan Clea Co., Tokyo, Japan) were used in all experiments. They were fed a commercial diet (Japan Clea Co.) and given water ad libitum. Mice were housed in an animal facility that was maintained at 24 to 26°C with 55 to 75% humidity and a 12-h light/dark cycle.
Blood retrieval and analysis
Mice were anesthetized with diethyl ether. The chest and abdominal walls were opened, and blood was retrieved by cardiac puncture. Serum was prepared and frozen at – 80°C until assayed for total IgE and antigen-specific IgG1, IgG2a, and IgE.
After exsanguinations, the lungs were fixed by intratracheal instillation with 10% neutral phosphate-buffered formalin at a pressure of 20 cm H2O for at least 72 h. Slices 2 to 3 mm thick of all pulmonary lobes were embedded in paraffin. Sections 3 μm thick were stained with Diff-Quik (International Reagents Co., Kobe, Japan) or periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) and examined by two of us (HT and KI) in a blind fashion.
Morphometric analysis for numbers of eosinophils, neutrophils, mononuclear cells, and goblet cells around the airways
Sections were stained with Diff-Quik to quantitate the numbers of infiltrated eosinophils, neutrophils, and mononuclear cells. The length of the basement membrane of the airways was measured by videomicrometer (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) in each sample slide. The number of eosinophils, neutrophils, and mononuclear cells around the airways were counted with a micrometer under oil immersion. Results were expressed as the number of inflammatory cells per millimeter of basement membrane as described previously .
To quantitate goblet cells, sections were stained with PAS. The number of goblet cells in the bronchial epithelium was counted by micrometer. Results were expressed as the number of goblet cells per millimeter of basement membrane as described previously .
The trachea was cannulated after the collection of blood. The lungs were lavaged with 1.2 ml of sterile saline at 37°C, instilled bilaterally by syringe. The lavage fluid was harvested by gentle aspiration. This procedure was conducted two more times. The average volume retrieved was 90 % of the 3.6 ml that was instilled; the amounts did not differ by treatment. The fluid collections were combined and cooled to 4°C. The lavage fluid was centrifuged at 300 g for 10 min, and the total cell count was determined on a fresh fluid specimen using a hemocytometer. Differential cell counts were assessed on cytologic preparations. Slides were prepared using an Autosmear (Sakura Seiki Co., Tokyo, Japan) and were stained with Diff-Quik (International reagents Co.). A total of 500 cells were counted under oil immersion microscopy.
Quantitation of cytokine and chemokine protein levels in the lung tissue supernatants
In a separate series of experiments, the animals were exsanguinated and the lungs were subsequently homogenized with 10 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 0.1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (Sigma, St Louis MO), 0.1 mM phenylmethanesulphonyl fluoride (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan), 1 μM pepstatin A (Peptide Institute, Osaka, Japan) and 2 μM leupeptin (Peptide Institute) as described previously . The homogenates were then centrifuged at 105,000 g for 1 h. The supernatants were stored at -80°C. Enzyme-linked immunosobent assays (ELISA) for interleukin (IL)-4 (Amersham, Buckinghamshire, UK), IL-5 (Endogen, Cambridge, MA), IL-6 (Biosource, Nivelles, Belgium), IL-13, eotaxin, macrophage chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1, and regulated on activation and normal T cells expressed and secreted (RANTES: R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN) in the lung tissue supernatants were conducted using matching antibody pairs according to the manufacture's instruction. The second antibodies were conjugated to horseradish peroxidase. Subtractive reading of 550 nm from the reading at 450 nm were converted to pg/ml using values obtained from standard curves generated with varying concentrations of recombinant IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-13, eotaxin, MCP-1, and RANTES, with limits of detection of 5 pg/ml, 5 pg/ml, 3 pg/ml, 1.5 pg/ml, 2 pg/ml 2 pg/ml, and 2 pg/ml, respectively.
The production of 8-OHdG in the lung was detected by immunohistochemical analysis (n = 8 in each group) using anti-8-OHdG polyclonal antibody (Japan Institute for the Control of Aging, Shizuoka, Japan) as described previously [19, 20]. Deparaffinized slides were blocked with 10% goat serum for 1 h. After blocking, anti-8-OHdG antibody (0.5 μg/ml) was incubated with the sections for 1 h at room temperature, followed by the incubation of a biotinylated secondary antibody and streptavidin-peroxidase conjugate. Then, the slides were incubated with 3-amino, 9-ethyl-carbazole chromogen, and counterstained with hematoxylin in AutoProbe III kit (Biomeda, Foster City, CA, USA). For each of the lung specimens, the extent and intensity of staining with anti-8-OHdG antibodies were graded on a scale of 0–4+ by two blinded observers on two separate occasions using coded slides as previously described . A 4+ grade implies maximally intense staining, whereas 0 implies no staining.
Antigen-specific IgG determination
Antigen-specific IgG1 or IgG2a antibodies were measured by ELISA with solid-phase antigen [5, 22]. In brief, microplate wells (Dynatech, Chantilly, VA) were coated with OVA overnight at 4°C and then incubated at room temperature for 1 h with PBS containing 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA; Sigma) containing 0.01% thimerosal (Nakalai Tesque). After washing, diluted samples were introduced to the microplate and incubated at room temperature for 1 h. After another washing, the wells were incubated at room temperature for 1 h with biotinylated rabbit anti-mouse IgG1 or IgG2a (Zymed Laboratories, San Francisco, CA). After yet another washing, the wells were incubated with horseradish-peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin (Sigma) at room temperature for 1 h. The wells were then washed and incubated with o-phenylenediamine and H2O2 in dark at room temperature for 30 min. The enzyme reaction was stopped with 4 N H2SO4. Absorbance was read at 492 nm. Each plate incubated a previously screened standard plasma that contained a high titer of anti-OVA antibodies. The results were expressed in titers, calculated based on the titers of the standard plasma. Cut off values for antibody-positive plasma were set to hold as the mean value of absorbance of preimmune plasma.
Total IgE and antigen-specific IgE determination
Antigen-specific IgE antibody was measured by IgE-capture ELISA [5, 22]. In brief, microplate wells were coated with a rat anti-mouse IgE monoclonal antibody (Yamasa Syoyu Co., Chiba, Japan) at 37°C for 3 h and then incubated at 37°C for 1 h with 1% BSA-PBS and 0.01% thimerosal. After washing with PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20 (PBST; Nacalai Tesque), diluted samples were introduced to the microplate and incubated overnight at 4°C. After washing with PBST, biotinylated OVA was added to each well and incubated for 1 h at room temperature with β-D-galactosidase-conjugated streptavidin (Zymed). After the final washing, the wells were incubated with 4-methylumbelliferyl-β-galactoside (Sigma) as the enzyme substrate at 37°C for 2 h. The enzyme reaction was stopped with 0.1 M glycine-NaOH (pH, 10.3). The fluorescene intensity was read by a microplate fluorescene reader (Fluoroskan Flow Laboratories, Costa Mesa, CA). Each plate included a previously screened standard plasma that contained a high titer of anti-OVA antibodies. The results were expressed in titers, calculated based on the titers of the standard plasma. Cut off values for antibody-positive plasma were set two hold as mean fluorescene units of preimmune plasma. Total IgE was measured by capture ELISA in a manner similar to the detection of antigen-specific IgE. A biotinylated rat anti-mouse IgE (BD Biosciences Pharmingen, San Diego, CA) was used to detect captured IgE in place of biotinylated OVA. A450 readings of the samples were converted to nanograms per milliliter using a standard curve generated with double dilutions of mouse IgE κ isotype standard (BD Biosciences Pharmingen).
Data were reported as mean ± SEM. Differences in the numbers of infiltrated inflammatory cells and goblet cells, cytokine protein levels, and immunogloblin concentrations and titers between groups were determined using analysis of variance (Stat view version 4.0; Abacus Concepts, Inc., Berkeley, CA) as described previously . If differences between groups were significant (P < 0.05), Fisher's protected least significant difference test was used to distinguish between pairs of groups.
Effects of nano particles on antigen-related airway inflammation
To evaluate the effect of nano particles on antigen-related airway inflammation, we investigated the cellular profile of BAL fluid and lung histology.
Cellular profile in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid.
Total Cells (× 10 4 /total BAL)
Macrophages (× 10 4 /total BAL)
Eosinophils (× 10 4 /total BAL)
Neutrophils (× 10 4 /total BAL)
Mononuclear Cells (× 10 4 /total BAL)
36.88 ± 3.56
36.74 ± 3.53
0 ± 0
0.12 ± 0.05
0.015 ± 0.01
111.69 ± 9.27**
83.79 ± 6.03**
0.332 ± 0.176
27.04 ± 4.98**
0.491 ± 0.201*
97.36 ± 16.06**
88.64 ± 15.34**
0.331 ± 0.177
8.09 ± 2.49*
0.265 ± 0.093
85.06 ± 12.63**
81.91 ± 12.4**
0.705 ± 0.255
2.2 ± 0.62
0.121 ± 0.059
OVA + 14 nm
193.69 ± 18.33** ## $$
141.86 ± 14.97** ## $
13.667 ± 4.731** ## $
36.9 ± 3.67** ## $
0.878 ± 0.232** #
OVA + 56 nm
102.65 ± 11.64**
90.7 ± 10.12**
3.984 ± 2.669
7.79 ± 2.29*
0.204 ± 0.073
The magnitude and cellular profiles of airway inflammation were also evaluated in lung specimens stained with Diff-Quik. Intratracheal instillation of nano particles provided diffuse deposition of the particles into the bilateral lungs, including the bronchi and alveolar spaces. The particles were occasionally present within the subepithelial neutrophils and alveolar macrophages. The combined instillation of OVA + 14 nm nano particles for 6 wk led to a marked infiltration of eosinophils and mononuclear cells around the bronchi and bronchioles. OVA + 56 nm nano particles also induced severe airway inflammation, but the severity was less than that of OVA + 14 nm nano particles. Either OVA or nano particles alone resulted in slight recruitment of eosinophils and neutrophils. Vehicle administration caused little infiltration of inflammatory cells.
Numbers of inflammatory cells and goblet cells in lung tissue.
0.187 ± 0.064
0.616 ± 0.140
0.495 ± 0.224
0.177 ± 0.070
1.419 ± 0.466
3.825 ± 1.073 **
2.431 ± 0.736 *
0.243 ± 0.068
0.252 ± 0.055
1.710 ± 0.426
0.967 ± 0.418
2.510 ± 2.249
2.442 ± 0.761
1.671 ± 0.222
2.546 ± 0.479 *
5.262 ± 4.150
OVA + 14 nm
7.252 ± 2.745 ** ## $$
4.144 ± 0.795 ** #
5.393 ± 0.560 ** ## $$
17.141 ± 6.702 ** # $$
OVA + 56 nm
3.022 ± 0.830
2.546 ± 0.563 *
2.202 ± 1.086
12.932 ± 3.230 * $
Nano particles increase goblet cells after antigen challenge
To evaluate airway epithelial injury and hypersecretion of mucus, lung sections were stained with PAS (Table 2). OVA plus 56 nm nano particles increased the number of goblet cells as compared with vehicle without significance. The number was significantly greater in the OVA + 14 nm nano particle group than in the vehicle (P < 0.01), the OVA (P < 0.05), or the 14 nm nano particle group (P < 0.01). The number was greater also in the OVA + 56 nm nano particle group than in the vehicle (P < 0.05), the OVA (N. S.), or the 56 nm nano particle group (P < 0.05).
Effects of nano particles on local expression of Th2 cytokines in the presence of antigen
Protein levels of Th2 cytokines in the lung tissue supernatants.
(pg/total lung tissue supernatants)
5.5 ± 1.1
4.0 ± 1.1
204.3 ± 13.1
4.6 ± 1.9
7.4 ± 4.3
194.7 ± 12.8
7.1 ± 1.9
21.1 ± 8.9
204.3 ± 12.5
26.8 ± 11.1
16.2 ± 7.3
216.5 ± 14.8
OVA + 14 nm
113.7 ± 32.0** ## $
120.3 ± 42.4** ## $
178.5 ± 16.2
OVA + 56 nm
88.8 ± 38.0** # $
61.8 ± 27.5*
170.8 ± 17.6#
Effects of nano particles on local expression of eotaxin, MCP-1, RANTES, and IL-6 in the presence of antigen
Protein levels of eotaxin, MCP-1, RANTES, and IL-6 in the lung tissuesupernatants.
(pg/total lung tissue supernatants)
67.9 ± 2.9
20.8 ± 3.5
174.6 ± 15.8
105.8 ± 3.6
99.4 ± 7.1
239.0 ± 17.4**
192.3 ± 18.0
151.7 ± 8.2
89.5 ± 9.2
89.3 ± 7.4
201.6 ± 22.1
106.5 ± 4.9
130.9 ± 32.3
41.9 ± 9.2
160.7 ± 17.1
118.3 ± 5.7
OVA + 14 nm
804.8 ± 175.7** ## $$
542.8 ± 45.4** ## $$
432.6 ± 27.8** ## $$
297.7 ± 30.2** ## $$
OVA + 56 nm
399.1 ± 86.9** # $
124.0 ± 14.1** #
235.4 ± 16.8* #
202.4 ± 54.2** # $$
Effects of nano particles on 8-OHdG formations in the presence or absence of antigen
We performed morphometric analysis to quantitate the extent and intensity of immunoreactive 8-OHdG among the experimental groups. As compared to vehicle treatment (immunohistochemical score, mean ± SEM: 0.8 ± 0.3), nano particles or OVA treatment revealed increased immunoreactivity (14 nm nano particle: 2.0 ± 0.4, P < 0.05 versus vehicle; 56 nm nano particle: 1.5 ± 0.2; OVA: 1.9 ± 0.5). The scores were greater in OVA + nano particle groups (OVA + 14 nm nano particle group: 2.9 ± 0.6; OVA + 56 nm nano particle group: 2.5 ± 0.3) than in the vehicle (P < 0.01), OVA, or nano particle groups.
Effects of nano particles on adjuvant activity for total IgE and antigen-specific production of IgG and IgE
Levels of total IgE and antigen-specific IgG1, IgG2a, and IgE.
Total IgE (ng/ml)
Antigen-Specific IgG1 (titers)
Antigen-Specific IgG2a (titers)
Antigen-Specific IgE (fluorescene intensity)
93.8 ± 27.5
485.3 ± 274.2
152.1 ± 48.8
625.2 ± 49.3
152.3 ± 36.1
1880.3 ± 1656.2
163.5 ± 49.2
698.7 ± 61.0
304.1 ± 127.4
1128.2 ± 717.1
182.5 ± 72.9
610.9 ± 54.1
443.4 ± 173.2
2178.5 ± 910.7
256.7 ± 206.2
576.2 ± 89.3
OVA + 14 nm
871.9 ± 246.7** # $
28050.3 ± 13840.4** ## $
354.9 ± 141.7
860.7 ± 120.5* ##
OVA + 56 nm
515.6 ± 122.4*
4150.5 ± 1657.0
126.7 ± 32.2
600.7 ± 62.8
The present study demonstrated that nano particles administered by the intratracheal route enhanced airway inflammation associated with antigen challenge in mice. The inflammatory component was characterized by increased numbers of eosinophils, neutrophils, and mononuclear cells. Recruitment of these cells was accompanied by an increment in goblet cells in the bronchial epithelium. The airway inflammation induced by the combined administration of nano particles with antigen modulated local expression of IL-5, eotaxin, IL-13, RANTES, MCP-1, and IL-6. The formation of 8-OHdG was moderately induced by nano particles or antigen alone, and was further enhanced by antigen plus nano particles as compared with nano particles or antigen alone. The enhancing effects were more prominent with 14 nm nano particles than with 56 nm nano particles. Furthermore, 14 nm nano particles enhanced total IgE and antigen-specific production of IgG1 and IgE.
DEP exacerbate allergic diseases including allergic asthma . Elementary carbon, which is mainly involved in the nuclei of DEP, can enhance allergic sensitization. We used CB in the present study, since CB is a useful prototypical particle for the research on the effects and their mechanisms of PM including DEP. Because CB is relatively inert, the effects of particle size can be elucidated without confounding factors . Al-Humadi and coworkers have demonstrated that CB exacerbates airway inflammation related to antigen in rats . Last and colleagues have demonstrated that ambient particles with a diameter of less than 2.5 μm partially exacerbated lung inflammation related to antigen . However, the comparative study focusing on the effects of particle size on antigen-related airway inflammation has never been conducted in vivo. In the present study, nano particles aggravated antigen-related airway inflammation, which was confirmed by the counts of inflammatory leukocytes in BAL fluid and by the histological assesment. Furthermore, we showed that nano particles exaggerated goblet cell hyperplasia elicited by antigen. In overall trends, the enhancing effects were more prominent with 14 nm nano particles than with 56 nm nano particles. Furthermore, 14 nm nano particles had obvious adjuvant activity for the antigen-specific production of IgG1 and IgE. These results clearly indicate that nano particles can aggravate antigen-related airway inflammation in vivo. Also, the effects are greater with smaller particles than with larger particles. We have previously examined the effects of DEP on allergic airway inflammation using 100 μg of DEP in vivo [5, 24, 25]. Based on the previous studies from our laboratory, we chose the dosage of 50 μg/body of nano particles, which can be considered to be involved in 100 μg of DEP as elementary carbon. Indeed, the enhancing effects of 14 nm nano particles on the airway inflammation and cytokine expressions are comparable to those of DEP in the previous study . Another important point in this study is the surface area of the nano particles used. Surface area of particles exposed reportedly correlates magunitude of airway inflammation . In our study, the surface area of the 14 nm nano particles was 6.7 fold larger than that of 56 nm nano particles (300 m2/g versus 45 m2/g). Nano particles with larger surface area are likely to attach more immunoregulative molecules than those with smaller surface area. As a result, smaller nano particles (14 nm) may lead to more prominent aggravation of antigen-related airway inflammation than larger nano particles (56 nm) in the present study. We did not examine the effects of the nano particles with the same particle number in the present study. However, the number of smaller nano particles is larger than that of larger nano particles when the particles make the same weight. Alternatively, our study has demonstrated not only the size effects of nano particles, but also the effects of their surface area and/or the effects of their number on the antigen-related airway inflammation. Future independent studies uniforming the surface area or particle number will provide better widestanding for the effects of the nano particles on antigen-related airway inflammation.
Allergic asthma is often associated with activation of IL-5 gene cluster, a pattern compatible with predominant activation of Th2-like T-lymphocyte population. IL-5 is essential for maturation of eosinophils in the bone marrow and their release into the blood [27, 28]. Also, these Th2 cytokines are implicated in the pathogenesis of allergic reactions via their roles in mediating IgG1 and IgE production, and in differentiation, vascular adhesion, recruitment, activation, and survival of eosinophils. In our study, airway inflammation induced by the combined administration of nano particles and antigen were concomitant with the increased protein levels of IL-5. These results provide the first evidence that nano particles can accelerate antigen-related IL-5 expression and subsequent eosinophilic inflammation.
IL-13 is also recognized to regulate eosinophilic inflammation, and mucus secretion . On the other hand, IL-6 is believed to participate in airway remodeling . In the present study, nano particles enhanced the expression of the proteins in the presence of antigen. Therefore, nano particles may aggravate mucus hypersecretion and airway remodeling, at least partly, through the enhanced expression of IL-13 and IL-6. In fact, the OVA + nano particle groups showed enhancement in the mucus hypersecretion as compared with the OVA group or the nano particle groups.
Among chemokines, eotaxin is essential for eosinophil recruitment in antigen-related airway inflammation [31, 32]. RANTES is a strong chemotactic and activating factor for eosinophils, and can modulate eosinophil adhesion [33, 34]. In fact, our previous studies have confirmed that the exaggerated allergic airway inflammation induced by DEP paralleled the local elevation of the inflammatory proteins [5, 22]. In the present study, nano particles enhanced the expression of these proteins in the presence of antigen as compared with antigen alone. The results suggest that nano particles aggravate allergic airway inflammation, at least in part, via the enhancement of the local expression of these proteins.
Interestingly, in our study, nano particles challenge increased the lung level of MCP-1 as compared to vehicle challenge. Also, the levels were significantly greater in the OVA + nano particle groups than in the vehicle or the OVA group. MCP-1 is a CC chemokine, and is chemoattractant for monocytes . It also has a chemoattractant effect of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes . MCP-1 also plays a role in recruitment of eosinophils to acute and chronic inflammatory sites . Furthermore, some particles such as silica  and amosite asbestos  reportedly can induce MCP-1 in vitro and in vivo. Thus, our findings indicate that pulmonary exposure to carbon nano particles may induce MCP-1 expression in the airways. In addition, the aggravating effects of nano particles on antigen-related airway inflammation should be mediated, at least in part, via the enhanced expression of this chemokine.
In overall trends, the enhancing effects of nano particles on local expression of cytokines and chemokines related to antigen challenge were more prominent with 14 nm nano particles than with 56 nm nano particles. The differences in the enhanced expression of the proteins between the two sizes of nano particles may contribute, at least partly, to the differences in the magnitude of antigen-related airway inflammation and goblet cell hyperplasia.
Redox imbalance is a critical factor for tissue injury in various pulmonary diseases including inflammation such as asthma [39, 40]. Airway macrophages from individuals with asthma produce more reactive oxidative species (ROS) than those from control subjects . On the other hand, nano particles have been implicated to induce and/or enhance oxidative stress . Furthermore, a recent study has demonstrated that the same type of nano particles as we used can induce ROS in the alveolar macrophages . We, therefore, evaluated the contribution of oxidative stress to the deterious effects of nano particles on antigen-related airway inflammation. 8-OHdG is a proper marker of the oxidative stress. In our study, immunoreactivity of 8-OHdG in the lung was more intense in the OVA + nano particle groups than in the nano particle groups or the OVA group. Further, enhanced immunoreactivity for 8-OHdG was detected in alveolar macrophages as well as polymorphonuclear leukocytes. It is suggested that the enhanced oxidative stress is involved, at least partly, in the aggravation of antigen-related airway inflammation caused by nano particles.
Antigen-specific IgE is thought to contribute to inflammatory cell accumulation after antigen challenge via degranulation of mast cells . On the other hand, IgG with antigen is a strong agonist for eosinophil degradation in vitro . Furthermore, late asthmatic reactions are associated with IgG antibody . Previous studies have reported that DEP with antigen demonstrate adjuvant activity for IgE production in vivo  and that those without antigen induce nonspecific IgE response in humans [48, 49]. In addition, we have reported that DEP enhance antigen-specific production of IgE and IgG induced by intratracheal challenge with antigen in vivo [5, 25]. In the present study, the combined intratracheal administration of 14 nm nano particles and antigen showed a significant greater increase in total IgE and antigen-specific IgG1 and IgE than the other administration. The enhancement in the antigen-specific immunogloblin production by 14 nm nano particles can induce the enhanced release of a variety of inflammatory mediators such as histamine and leukotrienes, resulting in aggravated manifestations of allergic asthma.
Finally, in the real world, we inhale nano particles and antigen in ambient air, not particle suspension nor aliquot of antigen. The dose of nano particles injected in the present study can be estimated to be less than a hundred fold than that we inhale in daily life. Further, real PM including DEP are complex mixture of carbon, metals, and organics, which are different from CB used in the present study. Thus, it remains to be elucidated in future whether daily inhalation of nano particles with or without other compounds including organic chemicals than elementary carbon combined with occasional exposure of aerosol antigen lead to the same results as the present study.
The present study has shown evidence that nano particles can aggravate antigen-related airway inflammation. The effect may be mediated, at least partly, through the increased local expression of IL-5 and eotaxin and also by the modulated expression of IL-13, MCP-1, IL-6, and RANTES. Furthermore, 14 nm nano particles enhance total IgE and antigen-specific production of IgG1 and IgE. These results suggest that nano particles can be a risk for exacerbation of allergic asthma. The aggravating effect may be larger with the smaller particles.
The authors are grateful to Naoko Ueki and Emiko Shimada for their assistance.
- Abbey DE, Nishino N, McDonnell WF, Burchette RJ, Knutsen SF, Lawrence Beeson W, Yang JX: Long-term inhalable particles and other air pollutants related to mortality in nonsmokers. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999, 159:373–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cohen AJ, Pope CA 3rd: Lung cancer and air pollution. Environ Health Perspect 1995,103(Suppl 8):219–24.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Dockery DW, Pope CA 3rd: Acute respiratory effects of particulate air pollution. Annu Rev Public Health 1994, 15:107–132.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Peters A, Wichmann HE, Tuch T, Heinrich J, Heyder J: Respiratory effects are associated with the number of ultrafine particles. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997, 155:1376–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Takano H, Yoshikawa T, Ichinose T, Miyabara Y, Imaoka K, Sagai M: Diesel exhaust particles enhance antigen-induced airway inflammation and local cytokine expression in mice. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997, 156:36–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Takano H, Yanagisawa R, Ichinose T, Sadakane K, Yoshino S, Yoshikawa T, Morita M: Diesel exhaust particles enhance lung injury related to bacterial endotoxin through expression of proinflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and intercellular adhesion molecule-1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002, 165:1329–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Utell MJ, Frampton MW: Acute health effects of ambient air pollution: the ultrafine particle hypothesis. J Aerosol Med 2000, 13:355–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ferin J, Oberdorster G, Penney DP: Pulmonary retention of ultrafine and fine particles in rats. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 1992, 6:535–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li XY, Brown D, Smith S, MacNee W, Donaldson K: Short-term inflammatory responses following intratracheal instillation of fine and ultrafine carbon black in rats. Inhal Toxicol 1999, 11:709–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- MacNee W, Donaldson K: How can ultrafine particles be responsible for increased mortality? Monaldi Arch Chest Dis 2000, 55:135–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nemmar A, Vanbilloen H, Hoylaerts MF, Hoet PH, Verbruggen A, Nemery B: Passage of intratracheally instilled ultrafine particles from the lung into the systemic circulation in hamster. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001, 164:1665–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maejima K, Tamura K, Taniguchi Y, Nagase S, Tanaka H: Comparison of the effects of various fine particles on IgE antibody production in mice inhaling Japanese cedar pollen allergens. J Toxicol Environ Health 1997, 52:231–48.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lambert AL, Dong W, Winsett DW, Selgrade MK, Gilmour MI: Residual oil fly ash exposure enhances allergic sensitization to house dust mite. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1999, 158:269–77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lambert AL, Dong W, Selgrade MK, Gilmour MI: Enhanced allergic sensitization by residual oil fly ash particles is mediated by soluble metal constituents. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2000, 165:84–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lovik M, Hogseth AK, Gaarder PI, Hagemann R, Eide I: Diesel exhaust particles and carbon black have adjuvant activity on the local lymph node response and systemic IgE production to ovalbumin. Toxicology 1997, 121:165–78.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- van Zijverden M, van der Pijl A, Bol M, van Pinxteren FA, de Haar C, Penninks AH, van Loveren H, Pieters R: Diesel exhaust, carbon black, and silica particles display distinct Th1/Th2 modulating activity. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2000, 168:131–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Last JA, Ward R, Temple L, Pinkerton KE, Kenyon NJ: Ovalbumin-induced airway inflammation and fibrosis in mice also exposed to ultrafine particles. Inhal Toxicol 2004, 16:93–102.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Al-Humadi NH, Siegel PD, Lewis DM, Barger MW, Ma JY, Weissman DN, Ma JK: The effect of diesel exhaust particles (DEP) and carbon black (CB) on thiol changes in pulmonary ovalbumin allergic sensitized Brown Norway rats. Exp Lung Res 2002, 28:333–49.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sanbongi C, Takano H, Osakabe N, Sasa N, Natsume M, Yanagisawa R, Inoue K, Kato Y, Osawa T, Yoshikawa T: Rosmarinic acid inhibits lung injury induced by diesel exhaust particles. Free Radic Biol Med 2003, 34:1060–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Inoue K, Takano H, Yanagisawa R, Sakurai M, Ichinose T, Sadakane K, Hiyoshi K, Sato M, Shimada A, Inoue M, Yoshikawa T: Role of metallothionein in antigen-related airway inflammation. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2005, 230:75–81.Google Scholar
- Sano H, Hla T, Maier JA, Crofford LJ, Case JP, Maciag T, Wilder RL: In vivo cyclooxygenase expression in synovial tissues of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis and rats with adjuvant and streptococcal cell wall arthritis. J Clin Invest 1992, 89:97–108.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ichinose T, Takano H, Miyabara Y, Sagai M: Long-term exposure to diesel exhaust enhances antigen-induced eosinophilic inflammation and epithelial damage in the murine airway. Toxicol Sci 1998, 44:70–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lambert AL, Mangum JB, DeLorme MP, Everitt JI: Ultrafine carbon black particles enhance respiratory syncytial virus-induced airway reactivity, pulmonary inflammation, and chemokine expression. Toxicol Sci 2003, 72:339–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Takano H, Ichinose T, Miyabara Y, Yoshikawa T, Sagai M: Diesel exhaust particles enhance airway responsiveness following allergen exposure in mice. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol 1998, 20:329–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miyabara Y, Takano H, Ichinose T, Lim HB, Sagai M: Diesel exhaust enhances allergic airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness in mice. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998, 157:1138–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Duffin R, Clouter A, Brown DM, Tran CL, MacNee W, Stone V, Donaldson K: The importance of surface area and specific reactivity in the acute pulmonary inflammatory response to particles. Ann Occup Hyg 2002,46(Suppl 1):242–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Clutterbuck EJ, Hirst EM, Sanderson CJ: Human interleukin-5 (IL-5) regulates the production of eosinophils in human bone marrow cultures: comparison and interaction with IL-1, IL-3, IL-6, and GMCSF. Blood 1989, 73:1504–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Greenfeder S, Umland SP, Cuss FM, Chapman RW, Egan RW: Th2 cytokines and asthma. The role of interleukin-5 in allergic eosinophilic disease. Respir Res 2001, 2:71–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Wynn TA: IL-13 effector functions. Annu Rev Immunol 2003, 21:425–56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- DiCosmo BF, Geba GP, Picarella D, Elias JA, Rankin JA, Stripp BR, Whitsett JA, Flavell RA: Airway epithelial cell expression of interleukin-6 in transgenic mice. Uncoupling of airway inflammation and bronchial hyperreactivity. J Clin Invest 1994, 94:2028–35.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Quackenbush EJ, Wershil BK, Aguirre V, Gutierrez-Ramos JC: Eotaxin modulates myelopoiesis and mast cell development from embryonic hematopoietic progenitors. Blood 1998, 92:1887–97.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Humbles AA, Conroy DM, Marleau S, Rankin SM, Palframan RT, Proudfoot AE, Wells TN, Li D, Jeffery PK, Griffiths-Johnson DA, Williams TJ, Jose PJ: Kinetics of eotaxin generation and its relationship to eosinophil accumulation in allergic airways disease: analysis in a guinea pig model in vivo. J Exp Med 1997, 186:601–12.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Alam R, Stafford S, Forsythe P, Harrison R, Faubion D, Lett-Brown MA, Grant JA: RANTES is a chemotactic and activating factor for human eosinophils. J Immunol 1993, 150:3442–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kakazu T, Chihara J, Saito A, Nakajima S: Effect of RANTES on eosinophil adhesion to plates coated with recombinant soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and expression of beta 2-integrin adhesion molecules on eosinophils. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 1995, 108:9–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Penny LA: Monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 in luteolysis. Rev Reprod 2000, 5:63–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Conti P, DiGioacchino M: MCP-1 and RANTES are mediators of acute and chronic inflammation. Allergy Asthma Proc 2001, 22:133–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barrett EG, Johnston C, Oberdorster G, Finkelstein JN: Silica-induced chemokine expression in alveolar type II cells is mediated by TNF-alpha-induced oxidant stress. Am J Physiol 1999, 276:L979–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hill GD, Mangum JB, Moss OR, Everitt JI: Soluble ICAM-1, MCP-1, and MIP-2 protein secretion by rat pleural mesothelial cells following exposure to amosite asbestos. Exp Lung Res 2003, 29:277–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Heffner JE, Repine JE: Pulmonary strategies of antioxidant defense. Am Rev Respir Dis 1989, 140:531–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Caramori G, Papi A: Oxidants and asthma. Thorax 2004, 59:170–3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Calhoun WJ, Reed HE, Moest DR, Stevens CA: Enhanced superoxide production by alveolar macrophages and air-space cells, airway inflammation, and alveolar macrophage density changes after segmental antigen bronchoprovocation in allergic subjects. Am Rev Respir Dis 1992, 145:317–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li N, Sioutas C, Cho A, Schmitz D, Misra C, Sempf J, Wang M, Oberley T, Froines J, Nel A: Ultrafine particulate pollutants induce oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage. Environ Health Perspect 2003, 111:455–60.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Beck-Speier I, Dayal N, Karg E, Maier KL, Schumann G, Schulz H, Semmler M, Takenaka S, Stettmaier K, Bors W, Ghio A, Samet JM, Heyder J: Oxidative stress and lipid mediators induced in alveolar macrophages by ultrafine particles. Free Radic Biol Med 2005, 38:1080–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zweiman B: The late-phase reaction: role of IgE, its receptor and cytokines. Curr Opin Immunol 1993, 5:950–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kaneko M, Swanson MC, Gleich GJ, Kita H: Allergen-specific IgG1 and IgG3 through Fc gamma RII induce eosinophil degranulation. J Clin Invest 1995, 95:2813–21.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Durham SR, Lee TH, Cromwell O, Shaw RJ, Merrett TG, Merrett J, Cooper P, Kay AB: Immunologic studies in allergen-induced late-phase asthmatic reactions. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1984, 74:49–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Takafuji S, Suzuki S, Koizumi K, Tadokoro K, Miyamoto T, Ikemori R, Muranaka M: Diesel-exhaust particulates inoculated by the intranasal route have an adjuvant activity for IgE production in mice. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1987, 79:639–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Diaz-Sanchez D, Dotson AR, Takenaka H, Saxon A: Diesel exhaust particles induce local IgE production in vivo and alter the pattern of IgE messenger RNA isoforms. J Clin Invest 1994, 94:1417–25.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Diaz-Sanchez D, Tsien A, Casillas A, Dotson AR, Saxon A: Enhanced nasal cytokine production in human beings after in vivo challenge with diesel exhaust particles. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1996, 98:114–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.