Open Access

Bronchial epithelial cells are rendered insensitive to glucocorticoid transactivation by transforming growth factor-β1

  • Christine R Keenan1,
  • Josephine SL Mok1, 2,
  • Trudi Harris1,
  • Yuxiu Xia1,
  • Saad Salem1 and
  • Alastair G Stewart1Email author
Respiratory Research201415:55

https://doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-15-55

Received: 6 February 2014

Accepted: 25 April 2014

Published: 1 May 2014

Abstract

Background

We have previously shown that transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) impairs glucocorticoid (GC) function in pulmonary epithelial cell-lines. However, the signalling cascade leading to this impairment is unknown. In the present study, we provide the first evidence that TGF-beta impairs GC action in differentiated primary air-liquid interface (ALI) human bronchial epithelial cells (HBECs). Using the BEAS-2B bronchial epithelial cell line, we also present a systematic examination of the known pathways activated by TGF-beta, in order to ascertain the molecular mechanism through which TGF-beta impairs epithelial GC action.

Methods

GC transactivation was measured using a Glucocorticoid Response Element (GRE)–Secreted embryonic alkaline phosphatase (SEAP) reporter and measuring GC-inducible gene expression by qRT-PCR. GC transrepression was measured by examining GC regulation of pro-inflammatory mediators. TGF-beta signalling pathways were investigated using siRNA and small molecule kinase inhibitors. GRα level, phosphorylation and sub-cellular localisation were determined by western blotting, immunocytochemistry and localisation of GRα–Yellow Fluorescent Protein (YFP). Data are presented as the mean ± SEM for n independent experiments in cell lines, or for experiments on primary HBEC cells from n individual donors. All data were statistically analysed using GraphPad Prism 5.0 (Graphpad, San Diego, CA). In most cases, two-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni post-hoc tests were used to analyse the data. In all cases, P <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

TGF-beta impaired Glucocorticoid Response Element (GRE) activation and the GC induction of several anti-inflammatory genes, but did not broadly impair the regulation of pro-inflammatory gene expression in A549 and BEAS-2B cell lines. TGF-beta-impairment of GC transactivation was also observed in differentiated primary HBECs. The TGF-beta receptor (ALK5) inhibitor SB431541 fully prevented the GC transactivation impairment in the BEAS-2B cell line. However, neither inhibitors of the known downstream non-canonical signalling pathways, nor knocking down Smad4 by siRNA prevented the TGF-beta impairment of GC activity.

Conclusions

Our results indicate that TGF-beta profoundly impairs GC transactivation in bronchial epithelial cells through activating ALK5, but not through known non-canonical pathways, nor through Smad4-dependent signalling, suggesting that TGF-beta may impair GC action through a novel non-canonical signalling mechanism.

Keywords

Steroid resistance Inflammation GRE Smad4 Epigenetics

Introduction

Glucocorticoids are the most effective class of anti-inflammatory drugs available. However, several chronic inflammatory diseases appear to be inherently resistant to glucocorticoid therapy [1]. Even in disease states where glucocorticoids are usually effective, patient sensitivity to glucocorticoid action varies dramatically. Indeed, different tissues from the same patient may even differ in sensitivity, suggesting that it is the chronic inflammatory microenvironment that is responsible for localized resistance to glucocorticoid action [2, 3]. Several biochemical alterations have been associated with glucocorticoid resistance including increased levels of cytokines (TNFα, IFNγ, IL-2, IL-4, IL-13, IL-17, IL-27, MIF), oxidative and nitrative stress, and the presence of denatured collagen [1, 4, 5]. Despite the identification of these associations, the elucidation of the activation of downstream signalling pathways and the resultant impairment of the action of the glucocorticoid receptor, glucocorticoid resistance remains a major obstacle in the treatment of chronic inflammatory diseases.

Appreciation for the role of airway epithelial cells as a target for glucocorticoid therapy is ever increasing. The epithelium is the site of deposition for inhaled glucocorticoids, and as such can be exposed to much higher concentrations of glucocorticoid than any other cell type in the airway. A corollary of the importance of airway epithelial cells as a target for glucocorticoid activity is that it is also a key cell type in which glucocorticoid resistance may develop. There have been limited numbers of studies investigating the molecular mechanisms of resistance in epithelial cells, as opposed to the extensive attention paid to inflammatory cell types [4]. It is known, however, that inflammatory stimuli such as TNFα, and mitogens such as foetal calf serum (FCS), can induce resistance to glucocorticoid transactivation in epithelial cells [6]. Similarly, IL-17A has been found to induce resistance to glucocorticoid regulation of IL-8 production in epithelial cells [7]. Very recently, rhinovirus infection has also been shown to cause glucocorticoid resistance in airway epithelium through the activation of NFκB and JNK and impaired nuclear entry of GRα [8]. The epithelium is therefore gaining increasing attention as a cell type in which glucocorticoid resistance can develop.

We have previously shown that transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) impairs GRE-dependent transactivation and glucocorticoid regulation of interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 production in the A549 lung adenocarcinoma-derived epithelial cell line, in association with decreased nuclear translocation of GRα [9]. This resistance was not restricted to the A549 cell line, as TGF-β was also shown to impair glucocorticoid regulation of thrombin and IL-1 stimulated GM-CSF release from BEAS-2B bronchial epithelial cells. However, the precise molecular mechanism(s) through which TGF-β impairs glucocorticoid function is yet to be established in either cell line, or in primary bronchial epithelial cells.

TGF-β is renowned for its pleiotropic actions on a wide variety of signalling pathways. Depending on the cellular context, TGF-β can activate Smad proteins resulting in transcriptional regulation, and it can activate a wide variety of non-canonical pathways, such as MAP kinase pathways, phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) and Rho pathways. The NFκB pathway is also activated through increased IKK activity [10]. In the present study, we provide the first evidence that TGF-beta impairs GC action in the ‘gold standard’ in vitro epithelial model: differentiated primary air-liquid interface (ALI) human bronchial epithelial cells (HBECs). Furthermore, using the BEAS-2B bronchial epithelial cell line, we also present a systematic examination of the known pathways activated by TGF-beta, in order to ascertain the molecular mechanism through which TGF-beta impairs epithelial GC action.

Materials and methods

Cell culture

A549 lung adenocarcinoma and BEAS-2B bronchial epithelial cell lines were cultured as described [9]. Primary HBECs were purchased from Lonza (Waverley, Australia) and cultured using B-ALI™ BulletKit™ (Lonza) according to manufacturer’s instructions.

Air-liquid interface differentiation of primary HBECs

Primary HBECs were differentiated on fibrillar collagen-coated 24-well Corning® Transwell® inserts (Sigma #CLS34700, MO, USA) by culture at air-liquid interface for 4 weeks. Cell differentiation was confirmed through visualisation of beating cilia and measurement of trans-epithelial electrical resistance (TEER) using an EVOM2 Voltohmmeter (WPI, Sarasota, FL). Cells were treated with 40 pM TGF-β or control for 24 h, then stimulated with 100 nM dexamethasone (Dex), 100 nM budesonide (Bud) or vehicle control for 4 h after which total RNA was extracted and GC-inducible gene expression was measured by qRT-PCR.

Transfection of epithelial cells

BEAS-2B cells were co-transfected using Lipofectamine® 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) as previously described [9]. Plasmid vectors: pGRE-SEAP (Clontech Laboratories Inc., Mountain View, CA), pSM22-Luc [11], GRα-YFP construct (a kind gift from Prof John Cidlowski [12]). pmax-GFP (Amaxa, Lonza, Waverley, Aus) and pGL3-Luc (Promega, Alexandria, NSW, Aus) were used as internal transfection controls. Transfected cells were treated with TGF-β (4–100 pM) for 24 h prior to the addition of dexamethasone (Dex, 0.1-100 nM) or vehicle for 2 h. GFP and YFP expression were imaged using live-cell fluorescence microscopy using a Leica DMI6000B microscope. Supernatants were collected for measurement of secreted human placental alkaline phosphatase (SEAP) using a chemiluminescence kit (Roche Applied Science, NSW, Aus). Luciferase expression was determined from lysates prepared by scraping cells in 25 mM tris-phosphate buffer (pH 7.8) containing 10% glycerol, 1% triton X-100, 1 mg/mL BSA, 2 mM EDTA, 2 mM DTT. Cell lysate luciferase luminescence activity was determined by reagent buffer consisting of 20 mM Tris (pH 7.8), 33.3 mM DTT, 8 mM MgCl2, 0.13 mM EDTA, 0.47 mM Beetle Luciferin (Promega #E1601). siRNA targeting exon 7 of Smad4 (sense: 5′-GCCAUAGUGAAGGACUGUUtt-3′, Shanghai Genepharma, Shanghai, China), was transfected using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Invitrogen) as described previously [13].

RNA extraction and RT-qPCR

Total RNA was purified from A549 and BEAS-2B cell lines using TRIzol (Invitrogen, Doncaster, VIC, Australia), and from differentiated HBECs using RNeasy miniprep kit (Qiagen, Doncaster, VIC, Australia). RNA (100 ng) was reverse-transcribed in a 5 μL reaction using the High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Scoresby, VIC, Australia) then diluted with 145 μL DEPC-treated H2O. Real-time PCR was performed using ABI Prism 7900HT sequence detection system as previously described [9]. The generation of specific PCR products was confirmed by dissociation curve analysis. Primer sequences (Table 1) were obtained either from literature, or designed using Primer Express software (Applied Biosystems) with mRNA sequences from the National Centre for Biotechnology Information (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov).
Table 1

Primer Sequences for RT-PCR

Gene product

Forward primer

Reverse primer

18S

CGC CGC TAG AGG TGA AAT

TCT TGG CAA ATG CTT TCG CTC

CDKN1C

TCT GAT CTC CGA TTT CTT CG

CTC TTT GGG CTC TAA ATT GG

ENaCα

AGC ACA ACC GCA TGA AGA C

TGA GGT TGA TGT TGA GGC TG

FKBP5

AGA TTG AGC TCC TTG ATT TC

TGA ATA TCC CTC TCC TTT CC

GILZ

TCC TGT CTG AGC CCT GAA GAG

AGC CAC TTA CAC CGC AGA AC

GRβ

TCA ACT GAC AAA ACT CTT GG

AGT GCA CAT AAT CTT CTT TTT CTC A

IκBα

TAC CAA CTA CAA TGG CCA CAC G

TAG CCA TGG ATA GAG GCT AAG TGT AGA

MKP-1

CCA CAA GGC AGA CAT CAG CTC

TCT ATG AAG TCA ATG GCC TCG TT

PAI-1

TCA GGC TGA CTT CAC GAG TCT TT

CTG CGC GAC GTG GAG AG

SERPINA3

TCA AGA CAA GAT GGA GGA AG

TCA CCT ATC TCT CTG AAC TC

SLPI

GCA TCA AAT GCC TGG ATC CT

GCA TCA AAC ATT GGC CAT AAG TC

SMAD4

CCA GGA TCA GTA GGT GGA AT

GTC TAA AGG TTG TGG GTC TG

Tektin-1

ATT ACA GCT CTT GAA AAG GC

GGG CTA AAG TTT CCT TCA ATC

Quantification of IL-6 and PGE2levels in supernatants

Supernatant IL-6 was assayed by Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) (Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany) [9]. The level of PGE2 was measured by radioimmunoassay (RIA) according to previous studies [14] using commercial anti-PGE2 antiserum (Sigma #P5164).

GR expression, phosphorylation and sub-cellular localization

Glucocorticoid receptor expression and phosphorylation state was investigated by western blot analysis as described [13] using polyclonal antibodies directed against GRα, phospho-GR(Ser203), phospho-GR(Ser211), phospho-GR(Ser226) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). The levels of protein and β-actin (β-actin mouse monoclonal: Abcam, Cambridge, UK) were used to control for loading. GR subcellular localization was determined by GRα-YFP transfection (described above) and immunocytochemistry against GRα as described [9].

Cell viability

Cell viability was assessed using the Trypan blue exclusion method [13]. Cell viability was determined to be >95% at the conclusion of all experimental treatment periods in these studies.

Statistical analyses

Data are presented as the mean ± SEM for n individual experiments. All data were statistically analysed using GraphPad Prism 5.0 (Graphpad, San Diego, CA). In most cases, two-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni post hoc tests were used to analyse the data. A P value of <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

TGF-β impairs glucocorticoid transactivation in BEAS-2B cells

In BEAS-2B cells transfected with a plasmid bearing a GRE-controlled SEAP expression vector, incubation with TGF-β potently and extensively inhibited Dex-induced GRE activity with 4 pM sufficient to inhibit the maximum response by 50%, and complete inhibition observed at 40 pM TGF-β (Figure 1A). The GRE within the GRE-SEAP construct may respond differently to the GREs within the sequences of endogenous GRE-regulated genes in their orthotopic genomic context. Thus, measurement of the mRNA expression of a variety of GRE-inducible genes was used to assess the effect of TGF-β on dexamethasone-stimulated transactivation in the BEAS-2B cell line. Of the panel of genes assessed, the expression of most were markedly impaired. For example, the genes encoding epithelial sodium channel-α subunit (ENaCα), NFκB inhibitor-α (IκBα), glucocorticoid-inducible leucine zipper (GILZ) (Figure 1B), annexin 1 (ANXA1) and secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor (SLPI) (data not shown) were all impaired. The expression of some genes, however, was unchanged or enhanced at the time-point measured. For example, the expression of the gene encoding MAP kinase phosphatase 1 (MKP-1) was enhanced by TGF-β conditioning prior to dex exposure (Figure 1B).
Figure 1

Effect of TGF-β on glucocorticoid transactivation. BEAS-2B cells were incubated with TGF-β (4-100pM) for 24 h before stimulation by dexamethasone (1-100 nM). (A) GRE activity was measured in BEAS-2B cells transiently transfected with a GRE-SEAP reporter construct, incubated with TGF-β (4-100 pM), then stimulated with dexamethasone for a further 24 hours. The level of SEAP in the supernatants was expressed as a percentage the level induced in response to 30nM dexamethasone. (B) Glucocorticoid-inducible gene expression in non-transfected cells. BEAS-2B cells were incubated with TGF-β (40 pM) for 24 h before stimulation by dexamethasone (30 nM) for 4 h after which RNA was extracted and analysed by qRT-PCR. Gene expression is expressed as fold change from control. Data are presented as mean and SEM for n = 4 independent experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, *P < 0.001 c.f. Control (A), 30 nM Dex (B).

TGF-β does not cause widespread impairment of glucocorticoid regulation of cytokine production in epithelial cell lines

In order to measure the effect of TGF-β on GC transrepression, we examined the glucocorticoid regulation of pro-inflammatory gene expression. In the BEAS-2B cell line, we examined the expression of genes widely accepted to be regulated by transrepression. We found, as expected, that the pro-inflammatory cytokine TNFα significantly induced the expression of the genes encoding IL-6 and IL-8 in a dexamethasone-sensitive manner (Figure 2A). TGF-β alone induced the expression of IL-6 mRNA and further enhanced the induction by TNFα. Nevertheless, this induction of IL-6 mRNA was suppressed by dexamethasone, and the presence of TGF-β did not significantly reduce the level of inhibition by dex (Figure 2A,B). A similar pattern of results was observed for the regulation of COX-2 mRNA (Figure 2A). Although TGF-β inhibited the expression of IL-8 mRNA (Figure 2A), dexamethasone was similarly effective in inhibiting IL-8 expression in the presence and absence of TGF-β (Figure 2B).
Figure 2

Effect of TGF-β on glucocorticoid transrepression. (A) BEAS-2B cells were incubated with TGF-β (40pM) for 24 h, then incubated with dexamethasone (30 nM) for 30 min prior to stimulation with TNFα (10 ng/mL) for 4 h. RNA was then extracted and expression was analysed by qRT-PCR and expressed as fold change from control. (B) Data from (A) and (C) expressed as percentage inhibition by dexamethasone in the presence and absence of TGF-β. (C) A549 cells were incubated with TGF-β (40 pM) for 24 h, then incubated with dexamethasone (10 nM) for 30 min prior to stimulation with IL-1α (1 ng/mL) for 4 h (Gene expression) or 24 h (PGE2 determination). Gene expression was determined as in (A), PGE2 levels were determined by radioimmunoassay. Data are presented as mean and SEM for n = 3-4 independent experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

We had previously shown that dexamethasone regulation of IL-8 production is impaired by TGF-β in the A549 cell line [9]. However, as this was not observed in the BEAS-2B cell line, we decided to further examine the effect of TGF-β on glucocorticoid repression of cytokine expression in the A549 cell line to establish whether the TGF-β effect is specific to IL-8 regulation, or extends to the breadth of transrepressional impacts in this cell line. IL-1α significantly induced IL-6 and IL-8 mRNA in a dexamethasone-sensitive manner in the A549 cell line (Figure 2C). TGF-β enhanced the IL-1α stimulation of both IL-6 and IL-8 mRNA (Figure 2C). Dexamethasone significantly suppressed the enhanced IL-6 and IL-8 mRNA in the presence of TGF-β (Figure 2C). However, the extent of the suppression of IL-8 mRNA was reduced in the presence of TGF-β (Figure 2B). Interestingly, dexamethasone was similarly effective at inhibiting IL-6 mRNA (and IL-6 protein release, data not shown) in the presence and absence of TGF-β in the A549 cell line, similar to the BEAS-2B cell line (Figure 2B). Dexamethasone regulation of PGE2 production and COX-2 mRNA expression was also similar in the presence and absence of TGF-β in the A549 cell line, despite an inhibition of PGE2 production and a stimulation of COX-2 expression by TGF-β alone (Figure 2C).

TGF-β impairs glucocorticoid transactivation in differentiated primary HBECs

Primary HBECs met the criteria for ALI differentiation, including TEER values greater than 700 Ω/cm2 (data not shown) and increased Tektin-1 mRNA expression (Figure 3), a marker of ciliated cell differentiation. TGF-β impaired Dex-induced expression of several anti-inflammatory genes, including the genes encoding GILZ and ENaCα in ALI differentiated cells (Figure 3). Consistent with observations in epithelial cell lines, the expression of MKP-1 was not impaired following incubation with TGF-β (Figure 3). TGF-β also impaired budesonide-induced gene expression in a similar pattern (data not shown).
Figure 3

Effect of TGF-β on glucocorticoid transactivation in air-liquid-interface (ALI) differentiated primary human bronchial epithelial cells. Primary human bronchial epithelial cells (HBECs) were differentiated at air-liquid interface for 28 days, treated with 40 pM TGF-β or control for 24 h, then stimulated with 100 nM dexamethasone (Dex) or vehicle control for 4 h after which total RNA was extracted and GC-inducible gene expression was measured by qRT-PCR. Gene expression is expressed as fold change from control. Data are presented as mean and SEM from differentiated cells from n = 4 individual donors. ns P > 0.05, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, *P < 0.001.

TGF-β-induced impairment of glucocorticoid action is due to activation of activin-like kinase 5, but not due to activation of known non-canonical signalling pathways

Impairment of glucocorticoid action in the A549 cell line was found to be associated with activation of the activin-like kinase 5 (ALK5/TGFβRI kinase) receptor, but the downstream signalling pathways activated have yet to be elucidated. We therefore investigated the involvement of the ALK5 receptor in the BEAS-2B cell line using the selective ALK5 inhibitor SB431542 (1 μM), and other commonly used and well-characterized small molecule inhibitors (1–10 μM based on our previous use [9, 15] or the use of others [1619]) of the known non-canonical signalling pathways of TGF-β to examine which one or more of the downstream pathways may be involved. Inhibition of ALK5 using SB431542 completely prevented TGF-β-induced impairment of GRE activation in the BEAS-2B cell line. However, inhibitors of the downstream non-canonical signalling pathways had no effect on TGF-β-induced GRE impairment (Figure 4). Since it is conceivable that activation of more than one downstream pathway is responsible for impairment of glucocorticoid action, multiple inhibitors were used to simultaneously block multiple pathways, but no effect was observed on TGF-β-induced GRE impairment (data not shown).
Figure 4

Inhibition of known TGF-β non-canonical signalling pathways does not prevent the impairment of GRE activity. BEAS-2B cells transiently transfected with GRE-SEAP reporter construct were pre-incubated for 30 min with inhibitors (1 μM SB431542: TGF-β type 1 activin receptor-like kinase (ALK) receptors, 10 μM LY294002: non-selective PI3-kinase inhibitor, 1 μM U0126: MEK1/2 inhibitor, 1 μM SB202190: p38MAPK inhibitor, 10 μM 5Z-7-oxozeaenol: TAK1 inhibitor, 1 μM SP600125: JNK inhibitor, 10 μM IKK2 inhibitor VIII: selective IKK2 inhibitor, 10 μM TDZD-8: selective GSK-3 inhibitor) prior to the addition of 40pM TGF-β for 24 h and stimulation with 30nM dexamethasone for a further 24 h. Supernatants were then collected for determination of SEAP level and results were then expressed as a percentage of the level induced in response to 30nM dexamethasone. Data are presented as mean and SEM for n = 3-4 independent experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 significantly different from control expression.

TGF-β-induced impairment of glucocorticoid action is not dependent on Smad4

Smad4-targeted siRNA was used to examine canonical TGF-β signalling, since this protein forms a unique, common point within canonical TGF-β signalling pathways. Smad4-targeted siRNA resulted in a knockdown of more than 60% which persisted throughout the experimental period (Figure 5A). A concomitant impairment of Smad-dependent gene expression was confirmed by measurement of PAI-1 expression, along with a complete impairment of TGF-β-induced SM22 promoter activity (Figure 5B). However, neither GC-induced gene expression, nor its impairment by TGF-β, was affected by Smad4 knockdown (Figure 5C).
Figure 5

Smad4 does not mediate TGF-β induction of glucocorticoid insensitivity. Smad4 targeted siRNA reduces Smad4 expression (A), Smad-dependent gene expression and the activity of the Smad-dependent promoter of SM22 (B), but does not alter the level of impairment of GC-inducible gene activity by TGF-β (C). BEAS-2B cells were transfected with scrambled control or Smad4-targeted siRNA, then incubated with TGF-β (40 pM) for 24 h, followed by stimulation with Dex (30 nM) for 4 h. Data are presented as mean and SEM for n = 4 independent experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

TGF-β-induced impairment is not associated with either impaired GRα expression, nuclear localization or altered GRα phosphorylation status in the BEAS-2B cell line

In the A549 cell line, TGF-β-induced glucocorticoid impairment was partially attributed to impaired nuclear localization of GRα. We therefore investigated the potential relevance of this mechanism in BEAS-2B cells using live cell fluorescence microscopy of cells transiently transfected with a GRα-YFP construct. Localization of GRα-YFP fluorescence indicated that TGF-β did not affect the rate or extent of GRα nuclear localization following dexamethasone treatment (Figure 6A, Additional file 1). This observation was confirmed by immunofluorescence staining of non-transfected cells where equivalent GRα immunoreactivity was observed in both nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments of TGF-β treated and control cells (Figure 6B).
Figure 6

TGF-β does not influence glucocorticoid-induced GR α nuclear localization. (A) BEAS-2B cells transiently transfected with a GRα-YFP reporter construct were treated with TGF-β (40 pM) for 24 h then imaged before and after treatment with 30 nM dexamethasone (Dex), using time-lapse live-cell fluorescence microscopy (Leica DMI 6000B). Images were obtained every 30 sec for 30 min prior to Dex treatment, and for 2 h post-treatment. (B) Immunofluorescence of GRα in non-transfected BEAS-2B cells. Cells were incubated using an identical protocol to that in (A) except that at the end of the 2 h dexamethasone incubation, cells were fixed with 10% NBF then GRα immunolocalisation was probed with a FITC-labelled secondary antibody, and nuclei were co-stained with DAPI. Images presented are representative of four independent experiments. (C,D) Protein expression and phosphorylation state of GRα. Cell lysates from BEAS-2B cells were collected after 24 h treatment TGF-β (40pM), then 1 h treatment with 30nM dexamethasone. SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting using phospho-specific antibodies was performed, then the membrane was stripped and re-probed for total GRα expression for normalization. GRα expression was then normalized to β-actin expression. Data are presented as mean and SEM of 4 experiments. *P < 0.05, significantly different from control expression.

Additional file 1: Live-cell, phase contrast microscopy of BEAS-2B cells transiently transfected with a GRα-YFP reporter construct. BEAS-2B cells were treated with TGF-β (40 pM) for 24 h then imaged before and after treatment with 30 nM dexamethasone (Dex), using time-lapse live-cell fluorescence microscopy (Leica DMI6000B). Images were obtained every 30 sec for 30 min prior to Dex treatment, and for 2 h post-treatment. (MP4 2 MB)

Determination of GRα protein expression showed a significant reduction by 30 nM dexamethasone treatment, according with expectations based on previous studies in A549, BEAS-2B and HeLa epithelial cell lines [20, 21]. However, treatment with TGF-β did not affect either the level, or the down-regulation in the presence of dexamethasone (Figure 6C). Similarly, dexamethasone treatment altered the phosphorylation state of GRα according to expectations [22] with an increase in phosphorylation at serine 203 and serine 211 observed, and a decrease in phosphorylation at serine 226. Treatment with TGF-β had no effect on either basal phosphorylation state or the dexamethasone-induced changes in phosphorylation. Up-regulation of the non-ligand binding splice variant of the glucocorticoid receptor, GRβ, has been proposed to impair glucocorticoid activity through inhibiting the actions of GRα [2325] or through the recruitment of histone deacetylases (HDACs) [26]. qRT-PCR using validated primers to amplify GRβ did not produce a detectable product after 40 cycles of PCR for either control, dexamethasone-treated, or TGF-β treated cells.

TGF-β-induced impairment of glucocorticoid action is not a result of epigenetic repression of gene transcription

Epigenetic modifications such as DNA methylation through DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) and histone deacetylation through histone deacetylase (HDAC) are known to cause repression of gene transcription. We therefore examined whether 5-aza-2′deoxycytidine, a DNMT inhibitor, or Trichostatin A, an HDAC inhibitor, can prevent the impairment of glucocorticoid transactivation by TGF-β. However, inhibitors of DNMT or HDAC had no effect on the dexamethasone-induced expression of the genes encoding cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1C (CDKN1C) and ENaCα (SCNN1A), nor the impairment of gene transcription by TGF-β (Figure 7).
Figure 7

Effect of inhibitors of DNMTs and HDACs on TGF-β impairment of glucocorticoid-inducible gene expression. Effect of DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) inhibitor 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine and HDAC inhibitor trichostatin A on TGF-β impairment of glucocorticoid-inducible gene expression. BEAS-2B cells were incubated with inhibitors for 30 min prior to treatment with TGF-β (40 pM) for 24 h before stimulation by dexamethasone (30 nM) for 4 h after which RNA was extracted and analysed by qRT-PCR. Gene expression is expressed as fold change from control. Data are presented as mean and SEM for n = 3-4 independent experiments *P < 0.001.

Discussion

In this study, we have sought to ascertain the precise molecular mechanisms through which TGF-β impairs glucocorticoid action in epithelial cells. In order to successfully do this, it is necessary to first have a thorough understanding of the scope of impairment of glucocorticoid function. This study demonstrated that whilst TGF-β has a profound inhibitory effect on glucocorticoid transactivation, transrepressional mechanisms appear to remain intact. Since it is commonly accepted that glucocorticoids produce the majority of their anti-inflammatory effects through the repression of pro-inflammatory pathways [27], one might question whether the impairment of GC transactivation by TGF-β is a therapeutically relevant problem. One might even contend that TGF-β impairment of GC transactivation might be beneficial to the treatment of patients, since the multitude of side-effects from GC treatment [28] have been commonly thought to occur through transactivation mechanisms [29]. These dogmas, however, have never been universally accepted, and it is increasingly accepted that transactivational induction of anti-inflammatory genes such as Annexin 1, GILZ and MKP-1 are key to the anti-inflammatory actions of glucocorticoids [30, 31]. Moreover, it has recently been reported that side effects of glucocorticoids are closely associated with transrepression of nGRE-containing genes, rather than transactivation of pGRE-containing genes [32]. We contend, therefore, that transactivation is an important anti-inflammatory mechanism of glucocorticoids, and the very potent effect of TGF-β to completely suppress GRE activity, and markedly impair GC-inducible gene expression, is likely to contribute to glucocorticoid resistance observed in clinical settings.

The complexity of glucocorticoid molecular mechanisms is continuing to be unravelled. The simple story of transactivation of pGRE-containing genes, tethered transrepression of pro-inflammatory transcription factors, in particular NFκB and AP-1, and a couple of examples of nGRE-containing repressed genes, has long been outdated. In this study, we examined transactivational mechanisms through an examination of both GRE-dependent promoter activity and GC-inducible gene expression changes. Whilst 40pM TGF-β caused complete inhibition of GRE activity, not all GRE-containing genes are inhibited at this concentration, and those that are exhibit varying degrees of inhibition, suggestive of discordance between GRE suppression and the impairment of gene expression. This, however, is neither surprising nor unexpected. Synthetic GRE reporter constructs (and other reporter constructs) are well known to behave differently to endogenous promoters. They contain multiple tandem GRE sequences, and do not have the same complexity of regulation in terms of chromatin structure and epigenetic regulation, or the same regulation of expression by cofactors and sensitivity to post-translational modifications of GRα, as do endogenous GC inducible genes [31]. The complexity of regulation of endogenous promoters may also explain the differential effect of TGF-β on the panel of glucocorticoid-inducible genes assessed; an observation consistent between both epithelial cell lines and primary differentiated cells. The fact that TGF-β shows similar patterns of regulation of glucocorticoid-inducible gene expression in differentiated primary human bronchial epithelial cells provides strong evidence of the potential for TGF-β to regulate glucocorticoid action in situ in the airways of glucocorticoid-resistant patients.

We examined tethering transrepressional mechanisms through measuring GC regulation of inflammatory gene expression and mediator release. In the presence and absence of TGF-β, a similar degree of dexamethasone-induced repression of IL-6 mRNA, IL-8 mRNA and COX-2 mRNA in BEAS-2B cells, and COX-2 mRNA, IL-6 mRNA, IL-6 protein, and PGE2 production in A549 cells was observed. It has been widely accepted that glucocorticoids predominately repress the transcription of pro-inflammatory genes, such as the genes encoding COX2, IL-6 and IL-8, through a tethering transrepression of NFκB [33]. Therefore the lack of impairment by TGF-β of the glucocorticoid regulation of these genes could suggest that TGF-β has no effect on transrepressional mechanisms. In contrast, we also found that TGF-β decreased the percentage of inhibition by dexamethasone of IL-1-induced IL-8 mRNA expression in A549 cells, consistent with our previous study showing impaired IL-8 protein production in A549 cells [9] suggesting that under some conditions glucocorticoid repressional mechanisms may be impacted by TGF-β. However, the fact this impairment was not observed in the BEAS-2B cell line suggests that it may either be a cell-type-specific or stimulus-specific phenomenon, or may be due to differing direct effects of TGF-β on IL-8 expression, rather than a difference in the effect on glucocorticoid sensitivity.

Interestingly, it has been shown in A549 cells that dexamethasone does not inhibit IL-1-induced NFκB binding for up to 2 h [34] and it has further been noted that glucocorticoid effects on mRNA stability and GRE-dependent transactivation of induction of MKP-1, GILZ and IκBα, the inhibitor of NFκB can manifest as repression of gene transcription, without the involvement of transrepression mechanisms [30, 31]. It is plausible therefore that the impairment of glucocorticoid regulation of IL-8 production in A549 cells by TGF-β could be a further manifestation of the impairment of transactivation process already noted. Whilst this data cannot rule out an effect of TGF-β on transrepression mechanisms, such an effect seems highly improbable given the fact that TGF-β has no effect on the glucocorticoid regulation of so many prototypical transrepressionally controlled genes.

In the A549 cell line, TGF-β decreases both GRα expression and the nuclear translocation of GRα. Therefore, the impairment of glucocorticoid activity may be, but is not necessarily, partially attributable to a deficit of GRα in the nucleus [9]. GRα protein expression is decreased by glucocorticoid treatment through the well-described process of homologous down-regulation [35]. In this study, as expected, Dex treatment caused a decrease in GRα protein expression in the BEAS-2B cell line. However, neither the basal expression of GRα, nor its susceptibility to GC-induced down-regulation were affected by TGF-β. Furthermore, the level of GRα nuclear immunoreactivity and the rate and extent of Dex-induced GRα-YFP nuclear translocation was unaffected by TGF-β, suggesting that impaired nuclear localization of GRα is not explanatory of TGF-β-induced glucocorticoid insensitivity.

The phosphorylation state of GRα is known to impact on transcriptional activity, receptor stability, association with co-activators and co-repressors, and sub-cellular localization [22]. Altered GRα phosphorylation has been associated with impaired glucocorticoid responsiveness in airway smooth muscle cells [36]. Therefore, modulation of GRα phosphorylation by TGF-β could account for the effect of TGF-β in modulating glucocorticoid activity. We found, however, that TGF-β (at a concentration that results in complete suppression of GRE activity and significant impairment of GC-inducible gene expression) has no effect on the pattern of GRα phosphorylation at Ser203, Ser211 or Ser226, the most well studied GRα phosphorylation sites. Given the relevance of GRα phosphorylation to nuclear localization, these further observations are consistent with the finding that TGF-β has no effect on GRα nuclear translocation in the BEAS-2B cell line.

We have shown in this study that inhibiting the type 1 TGF-β receptor, ALK5 in the BEAS-2B cell line is able to fully prevent the effect of TGF-β in impairing glucocorticoid transactivation, much like observations made in the A549 cell line [9]. We therefore wanted to thoroughly examine the wide variety of downstream signalling pathways activated by TGF-β, both canonical and non-canonical, to unravel the underlying mechanism through which this occurs. We targeted each of the various kinases known to be activated by TGF-β, using well-validated small molecule inhibitors at concentrations that have been widely used by us and many other groups over many years [9, 1519]. However, we were not able to even partially mimic the effect of inhibiting the ALK5 receptor through inhibiting each individual known downstream pathway. The possibility of redundancy across the signalling pathways would only be revealed by inhibiting multiple pathways simultaneously. However, combining various inhibitors together in logical and random combinations similarly had no effect on TGF-β impairment of GC action. In order to examine canonical TGF-β signalling, we chose to knockdown the expression of Smad4, the common signalling transducer of the canonical pathways. Whilst we were able to knockdown Smad4 expression by >70% and markedly impair both the activity of the Smad-dependent promoter for SM22, and the expression of PAI-1 mRNA, an endogenous Smad-regulated gene, neither GC-inducible gene expression, nor the impairment of these genes by TGF-β was affected by Smad4 knockdown. Since epigenetic regulation of gene expression has been linked to mechanisms of glucocorticoid insensitivity [3739], we even investigated whether inhibitors of DNA methylation or histone deacetylation would prevent the GC impairment by TGF-β. However, these inhibitors similarly had no effect on TGF-β impairment of transactivation.

There are several potential explanations that remain. Firstly, TGF-β may signal through Smad2/3-dependent transcriptional activation in a Smad4-independent manner [40, 41]. Therefore, our findings do not completely exclude a role for Smad-dependent signalling. The ALK5 receptor signalling pathway may also lead to downstream recruitment of known GR co-activators such as glucocorticoid receptor interacting protein 1 (GRIP-1), which has been shown to prevent glucocorticoid transactivation in airway smooth muscle cells [42], and is known to bind directly to Smad3 [43]. Similarly, TGF-β induction of GR co-repressors may mediate the transcriptional impairment observed. It is also conceivable that in our attempt to inhibit multiple signalling pathways simultaneously, we either did not inhibit the correct combination of pathways, or did not inhibit them in the correct temporal sequence for their role to be identified. Finally, and in our view the most plausible scenario is that there is a novel, non-canonical pathway being activated that could not be identified through an hypothesis-driven approach. Functional genomics or related operational approaches would therefore be required to determine the signalling cascade through which TGF-β impairs glucocorticoid action.

In this study, we have demonstrated that TGF-β potently induces insensitivity to glucocorticoid transactivation in epithelial cells, without impacting on glucocorticoid transrepression. Demonstration of the interaction of glucocorticoid and TGF-β in air-liquid interface cultures of human bronchial epithelium also raises the possibility of a mutual physiologically significant antagonistic interaction of these endogenous mediators during development, growth and repair. We have demonstrated that glucocorticoid impairment occurs downstream from the TGF-β receptor (ALK5), but is not mediated by known canonical or non-canonical pathways. Furthermore we provide data showing this impairment is not a result of epigenetic repression mechanisms, a theme that pervades recent literature concerning mechanisms of glucocorticoid resistance. This study therefore implicates novel TGF-β-inducible mechanisms as targets to modulate glucocorticoid action, and thereby restore glucocorticoid sensitivity. We consider it important to identify the downstream signalling pathways responsible due to the limitations of blocking TGF-β broadly. Since TGF-β activates such a wide variety of signalling pathways, and is involved in the homeostatic regulation of many cellular processes, it is not surprising that many unwanted side-effects develop from broadly blocking TGF-β action [44]. Of particular concern is the development of widespread inflammation and defects in autoimmunity [45, 46], as well as defective haematopoiesis and other cardiovascular defects [47], demonstrated many years ago in TGF-β1 knockout mice, and more recently using small molecule ALK5 inhibitors in rats [48, 49]. We believe that since TGF-β-induced glucocorticoid insensitivity appears to occur through a novel downstream signalling mechanism, it could potentially be very selectively targeted to restore glucocorticoid activity, whilst avoiding the multitude of potential side effects due to broadly inhibiting TGF-β action. Identifying this mechanism therefore has the potential to lead to new targets and novel treatments for glucocorticoid resistant disease.

Abbreviations

ALI: 

Air-Liquid-Interface

COX-2: 

Cyclooxygenase-2

Dex: 

Dexamethasone

ENaCα: 

Epithelial sodium channel alpha subunit

GC: 

Glucocorticoid

GILZ: 

Glucocorticoid-inducible leucine zipper

GR: 

Glucocorticoid receptor

GRE: 

Glucocorticoid response element

GFP: 

Green fluorescent protein

HBEC: 

Human bronchial epithelial cells

IκBα: 

Inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa B

IL-6: 

Interleukin-6

IL-8: 

Interleukin-8

MAPK: 

Mitogen-activated protein kinase

MKP-1: 

MAP kinase phosphatase 1

SEAP: 

Secreted embryonic alkaline phosphatase

SLPI: 

Secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor

TGF-β: 

Transforming growth factor-β

YFP: 

Yellow fluorescent protein.

Declarations

Grant information

This work was supported by the NHMRC (Australia) project grant #1059665.

Acknowledgements

The GRα-YFP construct used in this study was a generous gift from Professor John Cidlowski, NIH. These studies were supported by a project grant from NHMRC.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Lung Health Research Centre, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Melbourne
(2)
Department of Pharmacology, University of Malaya

References

  1. Barnes PJ, Adcock IM: Glucocorticoid resistance in inflammatory diseases. Lancet. 2009, 373 (9678): 1905-1917. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60326-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Gross KL, Cidlowski JA: Tissue-specific glucocorticoid action: a family affair. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2008, 19 (9): 331-339. 10.1016/j.tem.2008.07.009.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Yang N, Ray DW, Matthews LC: Current concepts in glucocorticoid resistance. Steroids. 2012, 77 (11): 1041-1049. 10.1016/j.steroids.2012.05.007.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Keenan CR, Salem S, Fietz ER, Gualano RC, Stewart AG: Glucocorticoid-resistant asthma and novel anti-inflammatory drugs. Drug Discov Today. 2012, 17 (17–18): 1031-1038.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonacci JV, Harris T, Wilson JW, Stewart AG: Collagen-induced resistance to glucocorticoid anti-mitogenic actions: a potential explanation of smooth muscle hyperplasia in the asthmatic remodelled airway. Br J Pharmacol. 2003, 138 (7): 1203-1206. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705135.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Rider CF, King EM, Holden NS, Giembycz MA, Newton R: Inflammatory stimuli inhibit glucocorticoid-dependent transactivation in human pulmonary epithelial cells: rescue by long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2011, 338 (3): 860-869. 10.1124/jpet.111.181016.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Zijlstra GJ, Ten Hacken NH, Hoffmann RF, van Oosterhout AJ, Heijink IH: Interleukin-17A induces glucocorticoid insensitivity in human bronchial epithelial cells. Eur Respir J. 2012, 39 (2): 439-445. 10.1183/09031936.00017911.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Papi A, Contoli M, Adcock IM, Bellettato C, Padovani A, Casolari P, Stanciu LA, Barnes PJ, Johnston SL, Ito K, Caramori G: Rhinovirus infection causes steroid resistance in airway epithelium through nuclear factor kappaB and c-Jun N-terminal kinase activation. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013, 132 (5): 1075-1085. 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.05.028.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Salem S, Harris T, Mok JS, Li MY, Keenan CR, Schuliga MJ, Stewart AG: Transforming growth factor-beta impairs glucocorticoid activity in the A549 lung adenocarcinoma cell line. Br J Pharmacol. 2012, 166 (7): 2036-2048. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.01885.x.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Massague J: TGFbeta signalling in context. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2012, 13 (10): 616-630. 10.1038/nrm3434.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Liu HW, Halayko AJ, Fernandes DJ, Harmon GS, McCauley JA, Kocieniewski P, McConville J, Fu Y, Forsythe SM, Kogut P, Bellam S, Dowell M, Churchill J, Lesso H, Kassiri K, Mitchell RW, Hershenson MB, Camoretti-Mercado B, Solway J: The RhoA/Rho kinase pathway regulates nuclear localization of serum response factor. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2003, 29 (1): 39-47. 10.1165/rcmb.2002-0206OC.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Schaaf MJ, Cidlowski JA: Molecular determinants of glucocorticoid receptor mobility in living cells: the importance of ligand affinity. Mol Cell Biol. 2003, 23 (6): 1922-1934. 10.1128/MCB.23.6.1922-1934.2003.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Khau T, Langenbach SY, Schuliga M, Harris T, Johnstone CN, Anderson RL, Stewart AG: Annexin-1 signals mitogen-stimulated breast tumor cell proliferation by activation of the formyl peptide receptors (FPRs) 1 and 2. FASEB J. 2011, 25 (2): 483-496. 10.1096/fj.09-154096.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Piper PJ, Stewart AG: Coronary vasoconstriction in the rat, isolated perfused heart induced by platelet-activating factor is mediated by leukotriene C4. Br J Pharmacol. 1986, 88 (3): 595-605. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1986.tb10240.x.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Schuliga M, Javeed A, Harris T, Xia Y, Qin C, Wang Z, Zhang X, Lee PV, Camoretti-Mercado B, Stewart AG: Transforming growth factor-beta-induced differentiation of airway smooth muscle cells is inhibited by fibroblast growth factor-2. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2013, 48 (3): 346-353. 10.1165/rcmb.2012-0151OC.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Martel G, Berube J, Rousseau S: The protein kinase TPL2 is essential for ERK1/ERK2 activation and cytokine gene expression in airway epithelial cells exposed to pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). PLoS One. 2013, 8 (3): e59116-10.1371/journal.pone.0059116.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Kassel KM, Dodmane PR, Schulte NA, Toews ML: Lysophosphatidic acid induces rapid and sustained decreases in epidermal growth factor receptor binding via different signaling pathways in BEAS-2B airway epithelial cells. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2008, 325 (3): 809-817. 10.1124/jpet.107.133736.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Guillot L, Le Goffic R, Bloch S, Escriou N, Akira S, Chignard M, Si-Tahar M: Involvement of toll-like receptor 3 in the immune response of lung epithelial cells to double-stranded RNA and influenza A virus. J Biol Chem. 2005, 280 (7): 5571-5580.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Sanda T, Asamitsu K, Ogura H, Iida S, Utsunomiya A, Ueda R, Okamoto T: Induction of cell death in adult T-cell leukemia cells by a novel IkappaB kinase inhibitor. Leukemia. 2006, 20 (4): 590-598. 10.1038/sj.leu.2404129.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Wallace AD, Cidlowski JA: Proteasome-mediated glucocorticoid receptor degradation restricts transcriptional signaling by glucocorticoids. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276 (46): 42714-42721. 10.1074/jbc.M106033200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Hirasawa N, Yashima K, Ishihara K: Enhancement of ligand-dependent down-regulation of glucocorticoid receptor by lipopolysaccharide. Life Sci. 2009, 85 (15–16): 578-585.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Galliher-Beckley AJ, Cidlowski JA: Emerging roles of glucocorticoid receptor phosphorylation in modulating glucocorticoid hormone action in health and disease. IUBMB Life. 2009, 61 (10): 979-986. 10.1002/iub.245.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Leung DY, Hamid Q, Vottero A, Szefler SJ, Surs W, Minshall E, Chrousos GP, Klemm DJ: Association of glucocorticoid insensitivity with increased expression of glucocorticoid receptor beta. J Exp Med. 1997, 186 (9): 1567-1574. 10.1084/jem.186.9.1567.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Oakley RH, Jewell CM, Yudt MR, Bofetiado DM, Cidlowski JA: The dominant negative activity of the human glucocorticoid receptor beta isoform. Specificity and mechanisms of action. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274 (39): 27857-27866. 10.1074/jbc.274.39.27857.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Goleva E, Li LB, Eves PT, Strand MJ, Martin RJ, Leung DY: Increased glucocorticoid receptor beta alters steroid response in glucocorticoid-insensitive asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006, 173 (6): 607-616. 10.1164/rccm.200507-1046OC.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Kelly A, Bowen H, Jee YK, Mahfiche N, Soh C, Lee T, Hawrylowicz C, Lavender P: The glucocorticoid receptor beta isoform can mediate transcriptional repression by recruiting histone deacetylases. J Allergy Clin Immuno. 2008, 121 (1): 203-208. 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.09.010. e201View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Barnes PJ: Corticosteroid effects on cell signalling. Eur Respir J. 2006, 27 (2): 413-426. 10.1183/09031936.06.00125404.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Schacke H, Docke WD, Asadullah K: Mechanisms involved in the side effects of glucocorticoids. Pharmacol Ther. 2002, 96 (1): 23-43. 10.1016/S0163-7258(02)00297-8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Schacke H, Berger M, Rehwinkel H, Asadullah K: Selective glucocorticoid receptor agonists (SEGRAs): novel ligands with an improved therapeutic index. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2007, 275 (1–2): 109-117.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Newton R, Holden NS: Separating transrepression and transactivation: a distressing divorce for the glucocorticoid receptor?. Mol Pharmacol. 2007, 72 (4): 799-809. 10.1124/mol.107.038794.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Clark AR, Belvisi MG: Maps and legends: the quest for dissociated ligands of the glucocorticoid receptor. Pharmacol Ther. 2012, 134 (1): 54-67. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2011.12.004.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Surjit M, Ganti KP, Mukherji A, Ye T, Hua G, Metzger D, Li M, Chambon P: Widespread negative response elements mediate direct repression by agonist-liganded glucocorticoid receptor. Cell. 2011, 145 (2): 224-241. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.03.027.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Mukaida N, Morita M, Ishikawa Y, Rice N, Okamoto S, Kasahara T, Matsushima K: Novel mechanism of glucocorticoid-mediated gene repression. Nuclear factor-kappa B is target for glucocorticoid-mediated interleukin 8 gene repression. J Biol Chem. 1994, 269 (18): 13289-13295.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Newton R, Hart LA, Stevens DA, Bergmann M, Donnelly LE, Adcock IM, Barnes PJ: Effect of dexamethasone on interleukin-1beta-(IL-1beta)-induced nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB) and kappaB-dependent transcription in epithelial cells. Eur J Biochem. 1998, 254 (1): 81-89. 10.1046/j.1432-1327.1998.2540081.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Oakley RH, Cidlowski JA: Homologous down regulation of the glucocorticoid receptor: the molecular machinery. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 1993, 3 (2): 63-88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Bouazza B, Krytska K, Debba-Pavard M, Amrani Y, Honkanen RE, Tran J, Tliba O: Cytokines alter glucocorticoid receptor phosphorylation in airway cells: role of phosphatases. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2012, 47 (4): 464-473. 10.1165/rcmb.2011-0364OC.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Bachmann PS, Piazza RG, Janes ME, Wong NC, Davies C, Mogavero A, Bhadri VA, Szymanska B, Geninson G, Magistroni V, Cazzaniga G, Biondi A, Miranda-Saavedra D, Göttgens B, Saffery R, Craig JM, Marshall GM, Gambacorti-Passerini C, Pimanda JE, Lock RB: Epigenetic silencing of BIM in glucocorticoid poor-responsive pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and its reversal by histone deacetylase inhibition. Blood. 2010, 116 (16): 3013-3022. 10.1182/blood-2010-05-284968.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Adcock IM, Ford P, Ito K, Barnes PJ: Epigenetics and airways disease. Respir Res. 2006, 7: 21-10.1186/1465-9921-7-21.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Barnes PJ, Ito K, Adcock IM: Corticosteroid resistance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: inactivation of histone deacetylase. Lancet. 2004, 363 (9410): 731-733. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15650-X.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Ijichi H, Otsuka M, Tateishi K, Ikenoue T, Kawakami T, Kanai F, Arakawa Y, Seki N, Shimizu K, Miyazono K, Kawabe T, Omata M: Smad4-independent regulation of p21/WAF1 by transforming growth factor-beta. Oncogene. 2004, 23 (5): 1043-1051. 10.1038/sj.onc.1207222.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Descargues P, Sil AK, Sano Y, Korchynskyi O, Han G, Owens P, Wang XJ, Karin M: IKKalpha is a critical coregulator of a Smad4-independent TGFbeta-Smad2/3 signaling pathway that controls keratinocyte differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008, 105 (7): 2487-2492. 10.1073/pnas.0712044105.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Bhandare R, Damera G, Banerjee A, Flammer JR, Keslacy S, Rogatsky I, Panettieri RA, Amrani Y, Tliba O: Glucocorticoid receptor interacting protein-1 restores glucocorticoid responsiveness in steroid-resistant airway structural cells. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2010, 42 (1): 9-15. 10.1165/rcmb.2009-0239RC.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Li G, Heaton JH, Gelehrter TD: Role of steroid receptor coactivators in glucocorticoid and transforming growth factor beta regulation of plasminogen activator inhibitor gene expression. Mol Endocrinol. 2006, 20 (5): 1025-1034. 10.1210/me.2005-0145.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Akhurst RJ, Hata A: Targeting the TGFbeta signalling pathway in disease. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2012, 11 (10): 790-811. 10.1038/nrd3810.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Kulkarni AB, Huh CG, Becker D, Geiser A, Lyght M, Flanders KC, Roberts AB, Sporn MB, Ward JM, Karlsson S: Transforming growth factor beta 1 null mutation in mice causes excessive inflammatory response and early death. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993, 90 (2): 770-774. 10.1073/pnas.90.2.770.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Shull MM, Ormsby I, Kier AB, Pawlowski S, Diebold RJ, Yin M, Allen R, Sidman C, Proetzel G, Calvin D, Calvint D, Annunziata N, Doetschman T: Targeted disruption of the mouse transforming growth factor-beta 1 gene results in multifocal inflammatory disease. Nature. 1992, 359 (6397): 693-699. 10.1038/359693a0.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Dickson MC, Martin JS, Cousins FM, Kulkarni AB, Karlsson S, Akhurst RJ: Defective haematopoiesis and vasculogenesis in transforming growth factor-beta 1 knock out mice. Development. 1995, 121 (6): 1845-1854.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Anderton MJ, Mellor HR, Bell A, Sadler C, Pass M, Powell S, Steele SJ, Roberts RR, Heier A: Induction of heart valve lesions by small-molecule ALK5 inhibitors. Toxicol Pathol. 2011, 39 (6): 916-924. 10.1177/0192623311416259.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Frazier K, Thomas R, Scicchitano M, Mirabile R, Boyce R, Zimmerman D, Grygielko E, Nold J, DeGouville AC, Huet S, Laping N, Gellibert F: Inhibition of ALK5 signaling induces physeal dysplasia in rats. Toxicol Pathol. 2007, 35 (2): 284-295. 10.1080/01926230701198469.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Keenan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement