Skip to main content

Analysis of sex-based differences in clinical and molecular responses to ischemia reperfusion after lung transplantation

A Correction to this article was published on 07 September 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

Sex and hormones influence immune responses to ischemia reperfusion (IR) and could, therefore, cause sex-related differences in lung transplantation (LTx) outcomes. We compared men’s and women’s clinical and molecular responses to post-LTx IR.

Methods

In 203 LTx patients, we used the 2016 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation guidelines to score primary graft dysfunction (PGD). In a subgroup of 40 patients with blood samples collected before LTx (T0) and 6, 24, 48 (T48), and 72 h (T72) after lung reperfusion, molecular response to IR was examined through serial analysis of circulating cytokine expression.

Results

After adjustment, women had less grade 3 PGD than men at T48, but not at T72. PGD grade decreased from T0 to T72 more often in women than men. The evolution of PGD (the difference in mean PGD between T72 and T0) was greater in men. However, the evolution of IL-2, IL-7, IL-17a, and basic fibroblast growth factor levels was more often sustained throughout the 72 h in women. In the full cohort, we noted no sex differences in secondary clinical outcomes, but women had significantly lower peak lactate levels than men across the 72 h.

Conclusions

Men and women differ in the evolution of PGD and cytokine secretion after LTx: Women have a more sustained proinflammatory response than men despite a greater reduction in PGD over time. This interaction between cytokine and PGD responses warrants investigation. Additionally, there may be important sex-related differences that could be used to tailor treatment during or after transplantation.

Background

Studies of clinical outcomes after lung transplantation have shown a survival benefit for female versus male recipients, for reasons that remain unclear [1,2,3]. One potential explanation relates to sex-based differences in the pathogenesis of primary graft dysfunction (PGD). PGD is a leading cause of early morbidity and mortality after lung transplantation and portends poor late outcomes [4, 5]. The pathogenesis of PGD involves severe intraoperative ischemia–reperfusion (IR) injury resulting in alveolar inflammation and diffuse alveolar damage [6]. The molecular mechanisms underlying this process are complex, involving a biphasic response to which multiple immune cell lines contribute [7, 8].

Sex chromosome genes and sex hormones play a central role in immune regulation [9, 10]. The X chromosome contains the greatest density of immune-related genes in the whole genome [11]. In terms of sex hormones, testosterone (a suppressant) and estrogen (a stimulant) are thought to exert diametric influences on the immune response [12]. Whether sexual dimorphism in the immune and inflammatory response contributes to the pathogenesis of PGD and differential clinical outcomes after lung transplantation has not previously been explored. The objective of the current study was to compare clinical and molecular responses to IR after lung transplant in men versus women at a single center.

Methods

Study population

This study (Protocol Number H-42256) was approved by the Institutional Review Board for Human Subject Research for Baylor College of Medicine (BCM IRB). The BCM IRB is organized, operates, and is registered with the United States Office for Human Research Protections according to the regulations codified in the United States Coded of Federal Regulations at 45 CFR 46 and 21 CFR 56. The BCM IRB operates under the BCM Federal Wide Assurance No. 00000286, as those of hospital and institutions affiliated with the College. For prospective blood collection, all patients were consented. For the retrospective portion of the cohort, waiver of consent was approved. The data were anonymized for the privacy of the participants.

Between January 2015 and April 2020, 205 consecutive patients underwent single or bilateral lung transplantation at our institution. Two patients were excluded because of missing data, leaving 203 total patients in the full cohort. Within this cohort, a subgroup of 40 consented patients had peripheral blood samples collected for cytokine analysis (Fig. 1). We use extracorporeal life support (ECLS) for ventilatory or hemodynamic support in patients who do not tolerate single-lung ventilation or a test clamping of the pulmonary artery intraoperatively. We use ECLS prophylactically in patients with severe pulmonary artery hypertension. Our preferred method of ECLS has gradually evolved from cardiopulmonary bypass to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Our standard immunosuppression protocol was used for all patients in the study and included induction therapy with steroids, mycophenolate, and tacrolimus. All DCD donors included in our study were in Maastricht category 3.

Fig. 1
figure 1

CONSORT diagram for the study cohort

Study outcomes

Our primary aim was to compare clinical and molecular responses to IR after lung transplant in men versus women. The clinical response was described by using the PGD score according to the 2016 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) consensus guidelines [5]. The molecular response was analyzed by plotting the temporal distribution of cytokine levels within the first 72 h after reperfusion in the 40-patient subgroup. Our secondary aim was to compare clinical outcomes between men and women after lung transplantation.

Sample collection

To ensure maximal consistency, we followed a standardized protocol for peripheral blood collection, processing, and storage. Ten milliliters of peripheral blood were collected (in collection tubes containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid [EDTA]) before transplant, described as baseline or T0, and 6, 24, 48, and 72 h after lung reperfusion. The blood samples were immediately transferred to the Texas Heart Institute Biorepository for biomarker analysis.

Immunologic analyses

For biomarker analysis, blood collection tubes were centrifuged, and the plasma was isolated and immediately flash frozen and stored at − 80 °C. After slowly thawing on ice, plasma samples were processed according to the manufacturer’s recommendations for multiplex bead array (Bio-Plex, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). The plates were read with the Luminex MAGPIX with a lower limit of 100 beads per sample per analyte, and the cytokine concentrations were analyzed with the Bio-plex Results Generator. A coefficient of variation < 20% was the criterion for acceptance.

Statistical analysis

Clinical analysis

All descriptive statistics are reported as percentages or means. Continuous variables with normal distribution were compared by using the two-sided Student t-test. Continuous variables with skewed distribution were compared by using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Categorical variables were compared by using the Chi-square test or Fisher exact test. Overlap propensity weighting analysis was used to adjust for factors that could affect the clinical outcomes (Fig. 2). Overlap propensity weighting achieves exact balance in the means of confounding variables by weighting each sample proportional to its propensity score [13, 14].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Standardized mean differences between unweighted data and overlap propensity weighted data. BMI body mass index, DCD donation after circulatory death, ECD extended criteria donor, ELVP ex vivo lung perfusion, LAS lung allocation score

Cytokine analysis

We used analysis of variance (ANOVA) to compare longitudinal cytokine data. We fit a linear mixed-effects model (LMM) for each cytokine level and cell population. Because time and cytokine level are not linearly associated, a B-spline based on time, \({f}_{B}\left(time\right)\), was used to induce nonlinear structure. Moreover, \({f}_{B}\left(time\right)\), sex, and \({f}_{B}\left(time\right)sex\) were used as fixed effects, and random effects were allowed across subjects. \({f}_{B}\left(time\right)\times sex\) captures whether cytokine expression differs by the interaction between time and sex. To reduce residual errors, the LMMs were fitted on a log scale when there were no missing data. Overlap weighting was also used to adjust for three factors: type of transplant (single vs bilateral), ex vivo lung perfusion, and type of intraoperative ECLS [13, 14]. We used overlap weighting to achieve exact balance between groups in the means of confounding variables. ANOVA was used to test for differences between LMM coefficients of \({f}_{B}\left(time\right)\times sex\), and the ANOVA p-values were adjusted by using the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure for the original and overlap weighted cohorts, respectively. LMM coefficients \({f}_{B}\left(time\right)\times female-{f}_{B}\left(time\right)\times male\) that were far from zero would suggest that cytokine evolution is significantly different between female and male patients. Statistical analyses were conducted in R version 4.0.3 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). A two-sided p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Clinical characteristics

The clinical cohort consisted of 203 patients: 122 men (60%) and 81 women (40%). There were several differences between men and women in terms of clinical, donor, and operative characteristics (Table 1). These differences were resolved after overlap propensity score weighting (Table 2). Of note, we did not notice a difference between men and women in the use of ECLS (75% vs 80%, p = 0.398) or EVLP (11% vs 14%, p = 0.250). We also did not notice any sex differences in intraoperative RBC transfusion, volume administration, or type of fluids administered.

Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of 203 lung transplant recipients
Table 2 Overlap weighted demographic and clinical characteristics of 203 lung transplant recipients

Clinical response to ischemia reperfusion

Grade 3 PGD at 48 and 72 h

In the full cohort, grade 3 PGD (PGD3) at T48 was more common in men (n = 39; 32%) than in women (n = 15; 18.5%). After overlap propensity score weighting for both men and women, the PGD3 rate at T48 remained higher in men (35.6% vs 20.7%). The overlap propensity score–weighted average treatment effect among the overlap population (ATO) was − 0.149 (95% CI: − 0.274, − 0.024), suggesting that fewer women than men had PGD3 at T48 (Tables 3, 4).

Table 3 Outcomes of 203 lung transplant recipients
Table 4 Association between sex and primary and secondary outcomes: Overlap propensity score-weighted average treatment effect among the overlap population (ATO)

In the full cohort, the rate of PGD3 at T72 was similar between men (n = 30; 24.6%) and women (n = 17; 21.0%). After overlap propensity score weighting, the PGD3 rate at T72 was 29.3% in men and 22.8% in women. The ATO was − 0.065 (95% CI: − 0.204, 0.075), suggesting that there was no association between sex and PGD3 at T72.

Of note, the rate of combined PGD2 and PGD3 at T48-72 h was 70% (85/122) for men and 73% (59/81) for women (p = 0.640).

Grade 3 PGD from 0 through 72 h

Figure 3 shows the distribution of PGD3 events at 0, 24, 48 and 72 h after reperfusion in men and women. Reductions in PGD3 over time were less common in male patients (n = 30; 24.6%) than in female patients (n = 31; 38.3%). This difference was even greater after overlap propensity score weighting: 19.7% in men versus 38.9% in women. The ATO was 0.193 (95% CI: 0.048, 0.337), suggesting that PGD more often decreased in women than in men.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Evolution of PGD within 72 h after reperfusion in men (green) and women (red). p values are unadjusted

Next, we examined whether the evolution of PGD, defined as PGD score (on a scale of 0–3) at T72 minus PGD score at T0, was different between sexes. The mean PGD difference from T72 to T0 was 0.016 for men and − 0.235 for women. After overlap propensity score weighting for both men and women, the mean PGD difference from T72 to T0 was 0.133 for men and − 0.186 for women. The overlap propensity score–weighted ATO was − 0.319 (95% CI: − 0.631, − 0.007), which supports the hypothesis that the evolution of PGD was different between men and women, favoring a better outcome in women. Additionally, we explored the average number of living children and PGD score 3 at each timepoint in the female cohort. However, no differences were found at T0 (1.52 ± 1.31 vs 1.91 ± 1.85, p = 0.476), T24 (2.05 ± 1.36 vs 1.64 ± 1.73, p = 0.17), T48 (1.87 ± 1.20 vs 1.72 ± 1.75, p = 0.46) and T72 (2.06 ± 1.59 vs 1.66 ± 1.60, p = 0.30).

Cytokine response to ischemia reperfusion

A subgroup of 40 patients had peripheral blood samples available for cytokine analysis. The 27 male and 13 female patients in this subgroup had no statistically significant differences between them in clinical characteristics except for greater percentages of restrictive lung disease and preoperative use of anti-inflammatory agents among the male patients (Additional file 1: Table S1).

We found that sex had a statistically significant effect on the evolution of IL-2, IL-7, IL-17a, and basic fibroblast growth factor (B-FGF) (Fig. 4). This effect remained significant after adjustment for multiple comparisons in both the original and overlap weighted cohorts (Additional file 2: Table S2). Reviewing the adjusted p-values suggested that sex did not have a significant effect on the evolution of the following cytokines: TNF-α, IL-1B, IL-1ra, MCP-1, RANTES, MIP-1A, MIP-1B, IL-9, PDGF-BB, IP-10, eotaxin, IL-4, and G-CSF (Additional file 2: Table S2).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Evolution of several cytokines in the 40-patient subgroup that were different between men (green) and women (red)

Secondary clinical outcomes

We compared outcomes in the full cohort (n = 203) between men and women (Table 3). Overlap propensity score weighting was used to determine whether these differences were significant after adjustment for potentially confounding variables (Table 4). The mean peak lactate within 72 h was 7.39 mg/dL for men and 5.61 mg/dL for women. After overlap propensity score weighting, the mean peak lactate within 72 h was 6.99 mg/dL in men and 5.43 mg/dL in women. The overlap score-weighted average treatment effect among the overlap population (ATO) was − 1.57 (95% CI: − 2.622, − 0.509) suggesting that women had lower mean peak lactate elevations within 72 h after lung transplantation than men.

We did not observe statistically significant differences between men and women with regard to postoperative bacteremia, wound infections, Clostridium difficile colitis, 90-day survival, 1-year survival, stroke rate, acute rejection, postoperative intensive care unit LOS, tracheostomy use, airway dehiscence, prolonged ventilation, postoperative ECMO use, or rehospitalizations (Tables 3, 4).

Discussion

The current study is the first, to our knowledge, to explore sex-based differences in the evolution of clinical and molecular features of IR after lung transplantation. We noted more frequent resolution of PGD, the clinical phenotype of IR, in women than in men, even though women had a more robust and sustained expression of proinflammatory cytokines (IL-2, IL-7, IL-17a, and B-FGF). These findings show sex-specific differences in lung IR, which raises the potential for tailoring management to improve lung transplant outcomes in both sexes.

Our data suggest that women had less severe PGD than men. Women had less PGD3 at 48 h. Although there was no significant sex difference in PGD3 at 72 h, PGD3 at 72 h is less common in both sexes, making it more difficult to detect differences. Compared with men, between 0 and 72 h, women had a greater reduction in the incidence of PGD3 and greater improvement in their mean PGD score (0–3).

Long-term outcomes after lung transplantation can be significantly affected by even transient PGD [15]. If women do, in fact, have an inherent protective mechanism against severe IR injury and PGD, this could explain the superior long-term outcomes reported in several clinical series [1,2,3].

These findings have other important implications related to recipient and donor selection. Female patients on average have shorter stature than men, making it more difficult to find a donor lung of appropriate size; this could lead to longer wait times and, therefore, poorer survival on the transplant waitlist. This is especially true in patients with restrictive lung disease [16,17,18]. Another factor leading to longer wait times is related to underutilization of donor organs. Donor factors such as smoking history and other extended criteria features could increase recipients’ risk of PGD [4, 19, 20]. It is conceivable that female recipients are less susceptible to the deleterious effects of these donor risk factors, which would allow a broader consideration of donor organs for women patients.

Our subgroup cytokine analysis showed sex-specific differences in molecular responses to IR after lung transplantation. IL-2 levels rose during the first 6 h in both men and women, but whereas men had a greater elevation at 6 h with a return to baseline by 24–48 h, women had a return to baseline at 24 h, followed by a gradual rise for up to 72 h (Fig. 3). IL-2 is an X-linked cytokine produced by T-cells and antigen-presenting cells and is involved in stimulating T-cell proliferation and activation. This could have two different implications. One is that T-cell activation is implicated in the pathogenesis of PGD and could explain how the earlier and more robust rise in IL-2 at 6 h in men results in more severe PGD than women have [8]. On the other hand, IL-2 has also been shown to stimulate regulatory T-cell activity, which may be protective against PGD and rejection [21, 22]. This could explain why a gradual and sustained elevation in IL-2 coincides with resolution of PGD in women.

In addition to IL-2, three other cytokines showed a different evolution after reperfusion in women versus men. IL-7 had a similar expression pattern to IL-2’s after reperfusion: a marked resolution in men, contrasting with a persistent rise in women. While IL-7 has several distinct features, it may protect against PGD through T-cell–mediated events similar to those associated with IL-2 [23]. IL-17 had a similar distribution after reperfusion and also has both protective and destructive T-cell–mediated inflammatory effects [24]. B-FGF expression followed a similar trend to that of IL-7, with the exception that its peak at 6 h was similar between the sexes. B-FGF levels remained more elevated in women than men at 48–72 h. B-FGF is a growth factor produced by a wide variety of cells but one that has proangiogenic effects in the lung. It is conceivable that elevations in B-FGF after IR could improve endothelial cell function and integrity, which is vital for recovery from PGD. Conversely, overproduction of B-FGF has been shown to result in pulmonary hypertension and fibrosis [25].

Sex-based differences in IR have been noted by others in patients with cardiac, renal, and liver injury [26,27,28,29,30]. Our study showed sex-based differences in the clinical phenotype of IR injury (PGD), as well as IR-induced cytokine production, after lung transplantation. Moreover, we noticed a sex-based difference in lactate production after reperfusion. Lactate is produced by several end organs in response to IR [31,32,33,34]. Our observation that peak lactate levels were lower in women than men further supports the theory that women are better protected against IR.

This protection from IR may not always translate into meaningful clinical differences. For instance, we did not see a difference between men and women in terms of postoperative bacteremia, wound infections, Clostridium difficile colitis, 90-day survival, 1-year survival, stroke, acute rejection, postoperative intensive care unit LOS, tracheostomy use, airway dehiscence, prolonged ventilation, postoperative ECMO use, or rehospitalizations. It is possible that the lack of significant differences in clinical outcomes was due to sample size. But previous analyses of sex-based outcomes in the era before the lung allocation score, when transplants were not prioritized by recipient urgency, also found no clinically significant difference in long-term survival between men and women [3, 35]. Thus, while our study showed sex-based differences in susceptibility to IR injury in favor of women, the extent to which these differences are clinically relevant may depend on a variety of additional perioperative factors.

Limitations

Clinical observational studies are subject to potential, unrecognized confounders that could bias results. PGD grading can be subject to bias and interrater variability. Because of this, we used a rigorous method of determining PGD by using an expert grader and strictly adhering to the ISHLT 2016 guidelines for intubated and extubated patients. While we realize that PGD2 is also an important outcome, our analysis of the temporal evolution of PGD was limited to detecting extreme changes such as PGD3 to PGD0 or PGD1. Thus, we were not able to thoroughly explore differences in PGD2 between men and women. Also, T0 PGD scores accounted for the main difference between male and female patients, and without this measurement, it is conceivable that the differences between men and women would be marginal. This time point is controversial but still supported by the 2016 ISHLT consensus on PGD scoring. In addition, the peak cytokine expression occurred at this time point, making it an important time point for this study. The distribution of potential confounders for PGD scoring at T0, such as use of ECLS and EVLP, was similar between groups. Additionally, we acknowledge the importance of the hormonal status of the female patients; unfortunately, these data were not available.

Furthermore, the subgroup of 40 patients with blood samples available had a greater prevalence of restrictive lung disease and preoperative use of anti-inflammatory agents than the full cohort. Whether the patient’s primary disease alone could affect the evolution of cytokine levels over time requires further study. It is possible to make a type II error by incorrectly concluding that a particular cytokine did not show a difference in evolution between men and women. For instance, G-CSF, IL-4, IP-10, and eotaxin all differed significantly between men and women in their temporal evolution, but this significance was lost after adjustment for multiple comparisons (Additional file 2: Table S2). Similarly, limited sample size could have hampered our efforts to find meaningful differences in clinical outcomes. Further studies with larger numbers of patients could help clarify these effects. Finally, this analysis sought to show differences in molecular markers of IR through cytokine expression; we did not intend to, nor did we, establish a causal correlation between cytokine expression and PGD.

Conclusions

In the current study, we found several notable differences between male and female patients in the evolution of PGD and cytokine production after lung transplantation. Women showed a more sustained proinflammatory response than men despite a greater reduction in PGD over time. The relationship between these sex-based differences in cytokine production and PGD requires additional investigation. Our study adds to the growing body of evidence for sex-based differences in disease pathophysiology and clinical outcomes. Whether sex-specific therapies or treatment protocols in lung transplantation could improve outcomes warrants further evaluation.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Change history

Abbreviations

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

ECMO:

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

EDTA:

Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid

B-FGF:

Basic fibroblast growth factor

IR:

Ischemia–reperfusion

ISHLT:

International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation

References

  1. Creel M, et al. Gender differences in survival after lung transplant: implications for cancer etiology. Transplantation. 2008;85:S64-68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sheikh SI, et al. Age-dependent gender disparities in post lung transplant survival among patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103:441–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Loor G, et al. Gender differences in long-term survival post-transplant: a single-institution analysis in the lung allocation score era. Clin Transplant. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.12889.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Diamond JM, et al. Clinical risk factors for primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;187:527–34.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Snell GI, et al. Report of the ISHLT working group on primary lung graft dysfunction, part I: definition and grading—a 2016 Consensus Group statement of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017;36:1097–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gelman AE, et al. Report of the ISHLT working group on primary lung graft dysfunction part III: mechanisms: a 2016 Consensus Group Statement of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017;36:1114–20.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Fiser SM, et al. Lung transplant reperfusion injury involves pulmonary macrophages and circulating leukocytes in a biphasic response. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;121:1069–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Laubach VE, Kron IL. Pulmonary inflammation after lung transplantation. Surgery. 2009;146:1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bianchi I, et al. The X chromosome and immune associated genes. J Autoimmun. 2012;38:J187-192.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Klein SL, Flanagan KL. Sex differences in immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol. 2016;16:626–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ross MT, et al. The DNA sequence of the human X chromosome. Nature. 2005;434:325–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Oertelt-Prigione S. The influence of sex and gender on the immune response. Autoimmun Rev. 2012;11:A479-485.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Li F, Morgan KL, Zaslavsky AM. Balancing covariates via propensity score weighting. J Am Stat Assoc. 2017;113:390–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Thomas LE, Li F, Pencina MJ. Overlap weighting: a propensity score method that mimics attributes of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2020;323:2417–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. DerHovanessian A, et al. The role of TGF-β in the association between primary graft dysfunction and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome. Am J Transplant. 2016;16:640–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sell JL, et al. Short stature and access to lung transplantation in the United States. A cohort study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;193:681–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Weill D. Access to lung transplantation. The long and short of it. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;193:605–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wille KM, et al. Disparities in lung transplantation before and after introduction of the lung allocation score. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013;32:684–92.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Sabashnikov A, et al. Long-term results after lung transplantation using organs from circulatory death donors: a propensity score-matched analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;49:46–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Somers J, et al. A decade of extended-criteria lung donors in a single center: was it justified? Transpl Int. 2015;28:170–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Abbas AK, et al. Revisiting IL-2: biology and therapeutic prospects. Sci Immunol. 2018;3.

  22. Diamond JM, et al. Peripheral blood gene expression changes associated with primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2017;17:1770–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Barata JT, Durum SK, Seddon B. Flip the coin: IL-7 and IL-7R in health and disease. Nat Immunol. 2019;20:1584–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Amatya N, Garg AV, Gaffen SL. IL-17 signaling: the yin and the yang. Trends Immunol. 2017;38:310–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Laddha AP, Kulkarni YA. VEGF and FGF-2: promising targets for the treatment of respiratory disorders. Respir Med. 2019;156:33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Crockett ET, et al. Sex differences in inflammatory cytokine production in hepatic ischemia-reperfusion. J Inflamm (Lond). 2006;3:16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fan H, et al. Gender differences of B cell signature in healthy subjects underlie disparities in incidence and course of SLE related to estrogen. J Immunol Res. 2014;2014:814598.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Kher A, et al. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of sex differences in renal ischemia-reperfusion injury. Cardiovasc Res. 2005;67:594–603.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Murphy E, Steenbergen C. Gender-based differences in mechanisms of protection in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury. Cardiovasc Res. 2007;75:478–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ostadal B, Ostadal P. Sex-based differences in cardiac ischaemic injury and protection: therapeutic implications. Br J Pharmacol. 2014;171:541–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Biros MH, Dimlich RV. Brain lactate during partial global ischemia and reperfusion: effect of pretreatment with dichloroacetate in a rat model. Am J Emerg Med. 1987;5:271–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Setala LP, et al. Glucose, lactate, and pyruvate response in an experimental model of microvascular flap ischemia and reperfusion: a microdialysis study. Microsurgery. 2004;24:223–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sharma GP, et al. Arterio-venous difference in lactate levels in myocardial ischemia and reperfusion. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1978;56:1059–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Theodoraki K, et al. Transhepatic lactate gradient in relation to liver ischemia/reperfusion injury during major hepatectomies. Liver Transpl. 2006;12:1825–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gries CJ, et al. Development of a predictive model for long-term survival after lung transplantation and implications for the lung allocation score. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2010;29:731–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Stephen N. Palmer, PhD, ELS, of the Department of Scientific Publications at the Texas Heart Institute for his editorial contributions.

Funding

This research is supported by Grants from the Roderick D. MacDonald Research Fund (Grant number 20RDM004) and the JLH Foundation (Grant number 55354).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LCA, DAT, and GL made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work. LCA, SY, DD, WCF, HV, JM, CHM, ML, LCS, and GL made substantial contributions to the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work. LCA and GL made substantial contributions to drafting the manuscript. All authors contributed substantially to revising the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. All authors gave final approval of the version to be published and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. All authors have read the journal’s authorship statement. LCA and GL are the guarantors of the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriel Loor.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to publication

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) for Human Subject Research for Baylor College of Medicine (No. 00000286) (IRB Number: H-42256) with waiver of consent for retrospective clinical data abstraction.

Consent for publication

Not application.

Competing interests

Dr. Loor receives institutional grant support and travel reimbursement for ex vivo lung perfusion clinical trials from Transmedics, Inc. as well as institutional grant support from Medtronic, Maquet, and St. Jude. Dr. Loor serves on the advisory board of Breethe, Inc. and has received travel and lodging reimbursement, as well as an honorarium. All other authors have nothing to disclose with regard to commercial support.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Demographic and clinical characteristics of 40 lung transplant recipients with prospectively collected biomarkers.

Additional file 2:

P values for testing differences between coefficients of fB (time) × sex.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chacon-Alberty, L., Ye, S., Daoud, D. et al. Analysis of sex-based differences in clinical and molecular responses to ischemia reperfusion after lung transplantation. Respir Res 22, 318 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-021-01900-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-021-01900-y

Keywords

  • Lung transplantation
  • Sex differences
  • Gender differences
  • Primary graft dysfunction
  • Cytokines
  • Inflammation