Open Access

Airway and parenchyma immune cells in influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 viral and non-viral diffuse alveolar damage

Respiratory Research201718:147

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-017-0630-x

Received: 15 December 2016

Accepted: 26 July 2017

Published: 3 August 2017

Abstract

Background

Diffuse alveolar damage (DAD), which is the histological surrogate for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), has a multifactorial aetiology. Therefore it is possible that the immunopathology differs among the various presentations of DAD. The aim of this study is to compare lung immunopathology of viral (influenza A(H1N1)pdm09) to non-viral, extrapulmonary aetiologies in autopsy cases with DAD.

Methods

The lung tissue of 44 patients, was divided in the H1N1 group (n = 15) characterized by severe pulmonary injury due to influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 infection; the ARDS group (n = 13), characterized by patients with DAD due to non-pulmonary causes; and the Control group (n = 16), consisting of patients with non-pulmonary causes of death. Immunohistochemistry and image analysis were used to quantify, in the parenchyma and small airways, several immune cell markers.

Results

Both DAD groups had higher expression of neutrophils and macrophages in parenchyma and small airways. However, there was a higher expression of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes, CD83+ dendritic cells, granzyme A+ and natural killer + cell density in the lung parenchyma of the H1N1 group (p < 0.05). In the small airways, there was a lower cell density of tryptase + mast cells and dendritic + cells and an increase of IL-17 in both DAD groups (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

DAD due to viral A(H1N1)pdm09 is associated with a cytotoxic inflammatory phenotype, with partially divergent responses in the parenchyma relative to the small airways. In non-viral DAD, main immune cell alterations were found at the small airway level, reinforcing the role of the small airways in the pathogenesis of the exudative phase of DAD.

Keywords

Diffuse alveolar damage ARDS Human Influenza Pathology Autopsy

Background

Diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) is a histological pattern characterized by hyaline membranes, intra-alveolar oedema, alveolar epithelial cell injury, and neutrophilic inflammation. DAD is commonly found in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and it is considered a pathological hallmark that is correlated with the severity and duration of the disease [13].

DAD can occur as a consequence of different forms of lung insult, such as bacterial and viral infections, connective tissue diseases and sepsis, among others. In addition, the aetiology of DAD has been broadly divided in two groups: lung injury that affects primarily the pulmonary parenchyma (pneumonia, aspiration of gastric contents, inhalation injury); or indirect lung injury in the setting of a systemic process with an acute systemic inflammatory response (sepsis, severe trauma, pancreatitis) [4, 5].

Neutrophils and macrophages have been recognized as the main drivers in the physiopathology of DAD [6], resulting in the release of several cytokines associated with direct injury to the alveolar-capillary membranes. However, other cells from the innate and adaptive immune systems, such as lymphocytes, mast cells and dendritic cells, also certainly play roles in the pathogenesis of DAD, as shown mainly in animal studies [7, 8]. Due to its multiple aetiologies, it is plausible to conceive that the immunopathology is different in the various presentations of DAD.

The pandemic influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus emerged in 2009 and spread globally, leading to 284,400 deaths in that year [9]. Since then, the virus has circulated worldwide with an skip-and-resurgence behaviour in recent years [10]. A new outbreak of cases was observed in May 2016 in Brazil, mainly in São Paulo, with 411 confirmed deaths. [11]. Severe infection caused by the influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus can induce ARDS with a histopathological pattern of DAD associated with bronchiolitis and haemorrhage, as previously shown by our group [12]. The clinical course of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09-associated ARDS is different from non-H1N1 ARDS, in which patients require more extensive therapy, including extracorporeal lung support [13].

To date, very few pathological papers have analysed the broad panel of cells related to innate and adaptive immunity in the lungs of critical patients with DAD. We hypothesized that a viral cause of DAD would be associated with the presence of cytotoxicity-associated cells, which would be not present in the non-viral, non-pulmonary causes of DAD. Since airways and alveoli present site-specific differences in leukocyte trafficking and regulation of inflammations [14], we further reasoned that small airways would present a different profile than that of the parenchyma. Therefore, the aim of this study was to describe, quantify and compare the immune cells in the alveolar parenchyma and small airways of patients with viral and non-viral causes of DAD.

Some of the results of this study have been previously reported in the form of abstracts [1518].

Methods

This study was approved by the institutional review board of São Paulo University Medical School. It was a retrospective study using archived material from routine autopsies performed by the Autopsy Service of the Department of Pathology of Sao Paulo University Medical School.

Study population

Lung tissue from 44 autopsies performed at Sao Paulo University Medical School between 2002 and 2010 was retrospectively included in this study and was divided into three groups according to the cause of death. For all cases, autopsy reports and clinical charts were reviewed. We only included cases with clinical diagnosis of ARDS (ARDS group) or histological diagnoses of diffuse alveolar damage (H1N1 group) or absence of any pulmonary disease (control group), and with sufficient archived lung tissue material (at least 20 mm of alveolar septum).

The H1N1 group (n = 15) was characterized by pulmonary injury due to influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 infection. Viral infection was confirmed by nasopharyngeal swab specimens or in lung tissue using real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) testing, in accordance with guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

The ARDS group (n = 13) was characterized by non-pulmonary ARDS patients with non-viral infection causes of death, with histological findings of DAD [19] and the absence of chronic lung diseases. Clinical diagnosis of ARDS was defined accordingly to the Berlin definition [20].

The Control group (n = 16) was characterized by a non-pulmonary cause of death among non-smokers and non-ventilated patients and without previous lung diseases. All of these patients showed normal lung architecture on gross and microscopic examinations.

Lung tissue of these patients have already been used in previous studies of our group [12, 21, 22].

Tissue processing

Paraffin blocks of lung tissue collected during routine autopsy were retrieved from the archives of the Department of Pathology of Sao Paulo University Medical School. Three to four fragments of lung tissue were randomly collected from regions of altered lung parenchyma. In normal lungs, one fragment of lung tissue was collected from each lobe. The tissue was previously fixed in 10% buffered formalin for 24 h, routinely processed and embedded in paraffin. Five-micrometre-thick sections were stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) for confirmation of the histological diagnosis of DAD and the identification of small airways.

Morphological analysis and immunohistochemistry

One to three slides per patient containing alveolar septa and small airways were selected for analysis and immunohistochemical staining.

Immunostaining for the following markers was performed: CD8 T cells, CD4 T cells, CD83 cells, CD207 Langerhans cells, CD 57 natural killer cells (NK cells), chymase and tryptase mast cells, FOXP3 regulatory T cells, IL-17, Neutrophil elastase, CD 68 macrophages, and granzyme A and B cells, as previously described [23]. Antibody types and the pre-treatments used are shown in Additional file 1: Table S1.

After immunohistochemical staining, each slide was scanned using Panoramic Viewer® software, version 1.15.2 for Windows® (3DHistech, Budapest, Hungary).

For the alveolar parenchyma analyses, approximately 20 fields per case were selected for image analysis, with each field containing 1000 μm of alveolar septum at 500× magnification. Small airways were defined as those showing a basement membrane (BM) perimeter ≤6 mm [24]. Two to four small airways were analysed per patient, and the density of the inflammatory cells was quantified in each airway. The entire circumference was analysed at 500× magnification.

Marker expression in small airways and parenchyma was assessed using Image-Pro Plus® image-analysis software, version 6.0 for Windows® (Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, MD, USA).

The expression of the different markers in the alveolar septa was calculated as the density of positive cells divided by the corresponding alveolar septum length (cells/μm) and in the airways as the positive cells divided by the basal membrane perimeter (cells/μm). Since macrophages and neutrophils are present also in alveolar spaces, we quantified the density of these cells present in alveolar walls and in alveolar spaces, divided by the corresponding alveolar length. All of the slides were previously coded and analysed by two investigators blinded to the study groups. The interobserver correlation was kappa = 0.81.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS statistical software package, version 15 for Windows (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA), and GraphPad Prism software, version 5.00 for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Data are presented as the means ± SDs or medians (interquartile ranges). After testing for the distribution of data, one-way ANOVA or Kruskal Wallis tests were used to compare data among the H1N1, ARDS and Control groups, with adjustments using Bonferroni’s test. The association between cell densities was analysed by Pearson’s or Spearman’s coefficient tests. The level of significance was set at p ≤ 0.05.

Results

Study population

Demographic and clinical data of the H1N1 (n = 15), ARDS (n = 13) and Control (n = 16) group are presented in Table 1. The mean ± SD age of the H1N1, ARDS and Control group patients were 50 ± 12, 43 ± 15, and 54 ± 15 years old, respectively (p = 0.133). The main cause of death in the ARDS group was refractory sepsis (46%), and the primary causes of death in the Control group were cardiovascular diseases (56%).
Table 1

Demographic and clinical data

Characteristics

Control

(n = 16)

ARDS

(n = 13)

H1N1

(n = 15)

Age (years, mean ± SD)

54 ± 15

43 ± 15

50 ± 12

Sex (male/female)

9/7

5/8

9/6

Primary cause of death, n (%)

 Respiratory failure

-

4 (30)

11(73)

 Cardiovascular diseases

9 (56)

-

2 (13)

 Liver diseases

4 (25)

-

-

 Refractory sepsis

-

6 (46)

2 (13)

 Gastrointestinal disease

2 (12)

-

-

 Gastrointestinal bleeding

1 (6)

3 (23)

-

Patients with non-pulmonary ARDS showed the classical histological picture of DAD, characterized by hyaline membranes, intra-alveolar oedema, and neutrophilic exudates. The histological pattern observed in all of the patients was the exudative pattern, with four of them showing an initial proliferative pattern. There was no extensive tissue proliferation or fibrosis. All of the patients were ventilated using a lung-protective strategy with a low tidal volume (≤6 mL/Kg); the ventilatory parameters and PaO2/FiO2 values of ARDS are presented in Table 2. Three patients presented secondary bronchopneumonia according to the autopsy reports.
Table 2

Days of evolution, ventilatory parameters, PaO2/FiO2 values and predisposing factors for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients

Patient

Days of ARDS

Driving pressure cm H2O

PEEP cm H2O

PaO2/FiO2

Predisposing factors

1

1

10

8

161

Acute fulminant hepatitis

2

1

6

6

170.7

Cirrhosis

3

1

12

9

93.7

Lupus erythaematosus with hypovolaemic shock

4

2

25

10

166.3

Chronic pancreatitis with cholangitis

5

2

15

8

130.8

Cirrhosis; diarrhoea

6

2

13

14

156.5

Disseminated lymphoma

7

2

10

11

111.7

Myelitis

8

3

20

18

84

Cirrhosis

9

4

14

11

197

Multiple myeloma, acute gastrointestinal bleeding

10

6

15

10

196.7

Acute mesenteric ischaemia

11

9

12

17

119.7

Infectious endocarditis

12

10

16

14

108.3

Cirrhosis with variceal bleeding

13

16

10

10

186.7

Inguinal abscesses with peritonitis

Mean ± SD

4.5 ± 4.5

13 ± 4.7

11 ± 6.2

144 ± 39

 

Days of ARDS mean period from ARDS diagnosis until death. PEEP corresponds to mean values in the first 48 h, PaO2/FiO2 ratio of arterial oxygen tension to the fraction of inspired oxygen, PEEP positive end-expiratory pressure. PaO2/FiO2 corresponds to values assessed at the time of clinical diagnosis for each patient

All of the patients with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 infection showed extensive exudative DAD with variable degrees of pulmonary haemorrhage and necrotizing bronchiolitis. Six patients had evidence of bacterial infection in the lungs, confirmed by the presence of positive histochemical staining for bacteria, positive culture in the bronchial aspirate and/or positive PCR. Both PCR and bronchial aspirate cultures detected Streptococcus pneumoniae in all of the patients [12]. Patients with normal lung histology were used as controls.

Representative histological pictures of control and DAD groups are shown in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1

Representative H&E photomicrographs of the lung parenchyma from the Control a ARDS b and H1N1 c groups. Observe the presence of hyaline membranes (hm) in the ARDS group and inflamed and oedematous alveolar septa with hyaline membranes (hm) in the H1N1 group. Representative photomicrographs of the small airways from the Control d, ARDS e and H1N1 f groups, stained with H&E. There is small airway (br) oedema with epithelial denudation and the presence of inflammatory cells in the bronchioles (br) in the ARDS and H1N1 groups

Morphological analysis

A mean of 26.4 ± 8.1 mm of alveolar septum was analysed by staining for each patient. There were no differences in total septum length among the H1N1, ARDS and Control groups (25.7 ± 7.4 mm, 28.3 ± 5.2 mm, 25.3 ± 10.6 mm, respectively, p = 0.583).

Because of extensive necrotizing bronchiolitis in the H1N1 patients and extensive tissue use for the other groups, not all of the cases had the same number of small airways analysed, with some cases having no airways suitable for analysis. A total of 1161 small airways were analysed considering all of the stainings used, the number of analyzed cases for each marker varied from 6 to 13 in Control, 10–13 in ARDS and 6–13 in H1N1 cases. The mean perimeter of the small airways for the H1N1, ARDS and Control groups were 2.4 ± 0.6 mm, 2.3 ± 0.7 mm, 2.1 ± 0.9 mm, respectively, corresponding to small membranous bronchioles (p = 0.70). Representative images of the positive stained cells are shown in the Additional file 2: Figure S1.

Given the major role of neutrophils and macrophages in the pathophysiology of DAD, these cells were quantified in lung parenchyma and small airways, with a significantly higher density of cells in alveolar septa and alveolar spaces in ARDS and H1N1 when compared to the controls as expected. There were no differences between DAD groups (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Representative photomicrographs from the Control, ARDS and H1N1 groups showing Neutrophil Elastase + cells in lung parenchyma (a, b, c), and small airway (e, f, g); and CD68+ macrophages in lung parenchyma (i, j, k), and small airways (m, n, o). There was increased expression of Neutrophil Elastase+ cells and CD68+ macrophages in the H1N1 and ARDS groups compared to the Control group, in the parenchyma and small airways. The arrows indicate positive stainings. Graphs show the density of Elastase+ cells (d, h) and CD68+ macrophages (l, p) in the Control, ARDS and H1N1 groups (one-way ANOVA and Kruskal Wallis test)

In lung parenchyma analysis, there was a significantly higher expression of CD8+ T cells (Fig. 3 a, b, c, d), CD4+ T cells (Fig. 3 e, f, g, h), and CD83+ cells (Fig. 3 h, i, j, k) in the H1N1 group compared to the ARDS and Control groups. In addition, there was higher expression of granzyme A+ cell (Fig. 4 a, b, c, d) density in the H1N1 group, compared to the Control group. CD57+ (Fig. 4 e, f, g, f) cell density was increased in the H1N1 group, compared to the ARDS group.
Fig. 3

Representative photomicrographs of the lung parenchyma from Control, ARDS and H1N1 groups, stained immunohistochemically with CD8+ T cells (a, b, c), CD4+ T cells (e, f, g), CD83+ (i, j, k). There was increased expression of CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells and CD83+ cells in the H1N1 group compared to the ARDS and Control groups. The arrows indicate positive stainings. Scale bar = 100 μm. Graphs show the density of, CD8+ T cells (d), CD4+ T cells (h), CD83+ dendritic cells (l) of the Control, ARDS and H1N1 groups (one-way ANOVA and Kruskal Wallis test)

Fig. 4

Representative photomicrographs of the lung parenchyma from the Control, ARDS and H1N1 groups, stained immunohistochemically granzyme A (a, b, c) and CD57 (e, f, g) antibodies. There was increased expression of granzyme A+ cells in the H1N1 group, compared to the Control group; and increased expression of CD57+ cells in the H1N1 group, compared to the ARDS group. The arrows indicate positive staining. Scale bar = 100 μm. Graphs show the density of granzyme A+ cells (d) and CD57+ cells (h) in the parenchyma of the Control, ARDS and H1N1 groups (one-way ANOVA and Kruskal Wallis test)

There were no significant differences among the groups in the expression of chymase + and tryptase + mast cells, granzyme B+, IL-17 or CD20+ B cells, shown in Additional file 1: Table S2.

In small airway analysis, there was significantly decreased expression of CD83+ cells (Fig. 5 a, b, c, d) in the H1N1 group, compared to the controls. There was decreased expression of tryptase + mast cells (Fig. 5 e, f, g, h) and CD207+ cells (Fig. 5 i, j, k, l) in the H1N1 and ARDS groups, compared to the controls. Conversely, IL-17+ (Fig. 5 m, m, o, p) was increased in the H1N1 and ARDS groups compared to the Control group.
Fig. 5

Representative photomicrographs of the small airways from the Control, ARDS and H1N1 groups, stained immunohistochemically with CD83 (a, b, c), mast cell tryptase (e, f, g), CD207 (i, j, k), and IL-17 (m, n, o) antibodies. There was decreased expression of CD83+ cells in the H1N1 group compared to the controls, decreased expression of tryptase + mast cells and CD207+ cells in the H1N1 and ARDS groups, compared to the controls, and increased expression of IL-17 in the H1N1 and ARDS groups compared to the controls (arrows). The arrows indicate positive stainings. Scale bar = 100 μm. Graphs show the density of CD83+ dendritic cells (d), tryptase + mast cells (h), CD207+ Langerhans cells (l), and IL-17+ cells (p) in the small airways of the H1N1, ARDS and Control groups (one-way ANOVA and Kruskal Wallis test)

There were no significant differences among the groups in the expression of CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, CD57+ NK cells, chymase + mast cells, granzyme A and B or CD20+ B cells, shown in Additional file 1: Table S3.

The density of positive cells for Foxp3+ was very low in all of the samples and therefore was not quantified; the same finding occurred for CD207+ cells relative to the alveolar parenchyma.

There were no differences between patients with the exudative and initial proliferative histological patterns when the cellular analysis and clinical and ventilatory parameters in the ARDS group (p > 0.05) were compared, data not shown. In addition, no statistical differences were found when cases with bronchopneumonia in both H1N1 and ARDS groups were compared with cases without bronchopneumonia (p > 0.05), data not shown.

Morphological correlations

There was a positive correlation of the cell density of CD8+ cells with granzyme A+ cells (r = 0.578; p = 0.038) and CD57+ cells (r = 0.674; p = 0.008) in the parenchymas of H1N1 patients. There were a significant correlation between IL17+ cells and neutrophils (r = 0.829, p = 0.002) and macrophages (r = 0.825, p = 0.002) in the small airways in the ARDS group. The correlations are shown in Fig. 6. There were no significant correlations between immune cells and clinical/ventilatory parameters in ARDS group.
Fig. 6

Graphs show the positive correlations between the cell density of granzyme A+ and CD8+ cells (a), CD57+ and CD8+ cells (b) in the lung parenchyma of H1N1 patients; and neutrophil elastase + and IL17+ cells (c), and CD68+ cells (d) and IL17+ cells in the small airways of ARDS patients (Pearson’s coefficient tests)

Discussion

In the present study, we analysed a broad panel of cells related to innate and adaptive immunity in the lungs of critical patients with DAD. Our main finding was that DAD due to influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus infection was associated with an inflammatory phenotype different from non-viral causes of DAD, with partially divergent responses in the parenchyma relative to the airways. Both DAD groups presented higher alveolar and airway densities of neutrophils and macrophages. However, there was a significantly higher expression of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes, dendritic cells, granzyme A+, and NK cell density in the parenchyma of patients who died from influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 DAD, and there was lower cell density of tryptase + mast cells dendritic + cells and an increased number of IL-17+ cells in the airways, compared to non-viral DAD cases and the controls. These findings extend our previous description of the immunopathology on influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 severe lung infection, adding quantitative parameters to a broad cellular panel of immune cells, compared to other causes of DAD in different lung compartments.

In contrast, no significant changes in immune cells other than neutrophils and macrophages at the parenchymal level were observed in non-viral DAD cases compared to the controls. At small airway level there was a decreased cell density of tryptase + mast cells and CD207+ Langerhans cells and an increase in IL-17+ cells. Our data confirm that the effector cells neutrophils and macrophages are important in the pathogenesis of DAD [25]. The lack of other immune cell alterations at the parenchyma level in non-viral DAD causes could be explained by most of them having an extrapulmonary etiology with lymphocytic related immunological phenomena probably not occurring in the lungs. To our knowledge, this study was the first to compare immune cell infiltration in the parenchyma and airways of patients with DAD of different aetiologies.

As expected, immune responses in influenza A(H1N1)pdm09-associated DAD presented cytotoxic characteristics with increases in CD8+ T cells, NK+ cells and granzyme A+ cells in the parenchyma region, with strong correlations between CD8+ and CD57+ cells in the parenchyma. Granzymes are a family of five serine proteases present in the granules of cytotoxic cells, which require perforin to exert their cytotoxic activities, inducing apoptosis by different pathways. Granzyme A+ is more abundant, but granzyme B+ has more potent cytotoxic activity [26]. We previously described the presence of granzyme B+ cells in the lungs of these patients [12], but the current quantitative analysis showed that granzyme A+ was actually increased in the parenchyma with strong correlations between granzyme A and CD8+ cells. Harari et al. previously described in humans the blood profiles of CD8 T cells specific to influenza viruses, showing that CD8+ T cells were mostly perforin, granzyme K+, granzyme A+/−/, and granzyme B and that granzyme A was not associated with a cytotoxic profile [27]. Hirota et al. previously described the presence of increased granzyme B+ cells in the lungs of ARDS patients derived from biopsies and autopsies, but the causes of ARDS were not presented in their paper [7]. Whether the observed granzyme A profiles of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 cases were associated with less potent cytotoxic capacity and, therefore, with increased disease severity deserves further investigation.

There was a divergent pattern in the density of dendritic cells in A(H1N1)pdm09-associated DAD in the parenchyma vs. the airways. We used CD83 as a marker of mature dendritic cells, but CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T Foxp3+ cells can also express CD83 [28]. Since in this study there were negligible numbers of Foxp3+ cells in the lungs, it is likely that most of the CD83 + cells were mature dendritc cells (DCs). Whereas an increase in CD83+ matureDCs were observed in the parenchyma, SA presented a decrease in CD83+ DCs relative to the controls and a decrease in CD207+ Langerhans DCs relative to the controls and to non-viral DAD. This pattern was previously described in an experimental model of influenza A infection in mice, in which depletion was observed in CD11b + and CD11b2 myeloid DC subsets in the airway mucosa at day 4 of infection, returning to baseline by day 14 post-infection [29]. In the parenchyma, DCs were significantly elevated at day 14 and remained so until day 21 post-infection. Because airway DCs tend to have first contact with aeroallergens, it has been speculated that this early decrease is due to enhanced migration to draining LNs or apoptosis. Parenchymal DCs in the alveolar walls would represent a distinct microenvironment, which would be important in the later phases of infection, regulating T cell immunity [30]. To our knowledge, this study was the first to show a similar pattern in human tissue.

We found decreased cell density of tryptase + mast cells in the small airways of both DAD groups. Mast cells are important cells in the surveillance of infection, and H1N1 virus can infect mast cells, stimulating the release of cytokines and chemokines [31]. In contrast, Liu et al. showed that H1N1 virus induced mast cell apoptosis, which could explain our findings [32]. In non-viral DAD, the reasons for the decreased mast cell density in the airways are not clear. Interestingly, no changes at the parenchymal level were observed in any of the groups. These results could be explained by our cases being mostly exudative or early proliferative cases. Liebler et al. previously analysed ARDS cases in different histological stages, reporting that mast cells were increased only at a later fibroproliferative stage, and they suggested that these cells were not implicated in fibrogenesis [33].

IL-17 is known to be involved in the early pathogenesis of both viral and non-viral DAD, mainly due to its capacity to regulate neutrophil influx. Increased levels of IL-17 in the lungs are believed to be an early indicator of disease severity in H1N1 virus infection [3436]. We found increased levels of IL-17 in both groups but surprisingly only at the small airway level, showing significant correlations with neutrophil and macrophage cell densities in ARDS group. Our finding reinforced the contribution of bronchioles to the pathogenesis of acute interstitial diseases by secreting cytokines, and inflammatory mediators involved in the early phases of acute lung injury [21, 22].

This study had several limitations. Due to its retrospective character, we had limited access to clinical and ventilatory data at the time of death, especially from the A(H1N1)pdm09 cases, because some of the patients presented with very severe disease and died within a few days in other institutions [12], and they were referred to our service for autopsy. We were not able to include a group of patients with non-viral and pulmonary ARDS, given the heterogeneity of this group (bacterial, fungi, lung cancer, immunosuppression, etc), that would make interpretation of data difficult. Therefore, we cannot conclude about the specificity of the immune response in H1N1 cases. Furthermore, we analysed lung tissue from patients who developed severe disease, which might have presented differently in less severe cases of DAD and could explain the lack of significant clinical-morphological correlations. In both DAD groups we had cases with secondary bacterial infection, which might have influenced the results. Nevertheless, we were able to identify a cytotoxic profile compatible with viral infection in H1N1 cases.

Conclusions

In summary, we described the immune cellular profiles of DAD cases due to viral A(H1N1)pdm09 and non-viral DAD in fatal cases. Both DAD groups had increased numbers of neutrophils and macrophages, but the H1N1 group had a cellular cytotoxic profile at the parenchymal level, with a divergent pattern of dendritic and mast cell depletion at the small airway level. Other immune cell alterations were present only at the small airway level in non-viral DAD cases, reinforcing the role of small airways in the pathogenesis of exudative ARDS. Autopsy material is a unique material that, by providing access to different parts of the lungs, enhance our understanding of the immune processes occurring in DAD.

Abbreviations

ARDS: 

Acute respiratory distress syndrome

BM: 

Basement membrane

DAD: 

Diffuse alveolar damage

DCs: 

Dendritic cells

H&E: 

Haematoxylin and eosin

NK cells: 

Natural Killer cells

PaO2/FiO2

Ratio of arterial oxygen tension to the fraction of inspired oxygen

PEEP: 

Positive end-expiratory pressure

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the technicians of the histology and immunohistochemistry laboratories. We are grateful to Dr. Kelly Yoshizaki for helping with the histological quantifications. We also thank the Autopsy Service of São Paulo University for its technical support.

Funding

This work was funded by the Brazilian Research Council (CNPq).

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

MB carried out the immunohistochemistry reactions and the morphometric analyses, performed the statistical analysis, participated in the sequence alignment and drafted the manuscript. RCPN helped to carry out the immunohistochemistry reactions and the morphometric analyses, performed the statistical analysis and was involved in drafting the manuscript. RCRS participated in the morphometric analyses, and was involved in drafting the manuscript. MBA participated in the morphometric analyses and was involved in drafting the manuscript. MD contributed to the conception and design of the study, was involved in drafting and revising the manuscript. TM conceived the study, participated in its design and coordination, performed the histological and immunohistochemistry quality control, performed the statistical analysis, drafted and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the institutional review board for human studies (CAPPesq-FMUSP, protocol number 411/12).

Consent for publication

No consent was needed because we were working with retrospectively obtained material from lung tissue of autopsies; and we were granted a waiver of patient written consent by our institutional review board.

Competing interests

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no competing interest.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Departament of Pathology, University of São Paulo - School of Medicine (FMUSP)

References

  1. Katzenstein AL, Colin M, Leibow AA. Diffuse alveolar damage--the role of oxygen, shock, and related factors. A review. Am J Pathol. 1976;85:209–28.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Ware LB, Matthay MA. The acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1334–49.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Thille AW, Esteban A, Fernández-Segoviano P, Rodriguez JM, Aramburu JA, Peñuelas O, Cortés-Puch I, Cardinal-Fernández P, Lorente JA, Frutos-Vivar F. Comparison of the Berlin definition for acute respiratory distress syndrome with autopsy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;187:761–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Castro CY. ARDS and diffuse alveolar damage: a pathologist's perspective. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;18:13–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Parambil JG, Myers JL, Aubry MC, Ryu JH. Causes and prognosis of diffuse alveolar damage diagnosed on surgical lung biopsy. Chest. 2007;132:50–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Matthay MA, Zemmans RL. The acute respiratory distress syndrome: pathogenesis and treatment. Annu Rev Pathol. 2011;6:147–63.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Hirota JA, Hiebert PR, Gold M, Wu D, Graydon C, Smith JAAK, McNagny K, Granville DJ, Knight DA. Granzyme B deficiency exacerbates lung inflammation in mice after acute lung injury. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2013;49:453–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Mock JR, Garibaldi BT, Aggarwal NR, Jenkins J, Limjunyawong N, Singer BD, Chau E, Rabold R, Files DC, Sidhaye V, Mitzner W, Wagner EM, King LS, D'Alessio FR. Foxp3+ regulatory T cells promote lung epithelial proliferation. Mucosal Immunol. 2014;7:1440–51.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Dawood FS, Iuliano AD, Reed C, Meltzer MI, Shay DK, Cheng PY, Bandaranayake D, Breiman RF, Brooks WA, Buchy P, Feikin DR, Fowler KB, Gordon A, Hien NT, Horby P, Huang QS, Katz MA, Krishnan A, Lal R, Montgomery JM, Mølbak K, Pebody R, Presanis AM, Razuri H, Steens A, Tinoco YO, Wallinga J, Yu H, Vong S, Bresee J, Widdowson MA. Estimated global mortality associated with the first 12 months of 2009 pandemic influenza A H1N1 virus circulation: a modelling study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012;12:687–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. He D, Lui R, Wang L, Tse CK, Yang L, Stone L. Global Spatio-temporal Patterns of Influenza in the Post-pandemic Era. Sci Rep. 2015;5:11013.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Brazilian epidemiologic report—influenza A (H1N1) 2016. Available from: http://portalsaude.saude.gov.br/images/pdf/2016/maio/09/informe-epid-influenza-se17-2016.pdf. Accessed 1 Aug 2017.
  12. Mauad T, Hajjar LA, Callegari GD, da Silva LF, Schout D, Galas FR, Alves VA, Malheiros DM, Auler JO Jr, Ferreira AF, Borsato MR, Bezerra SM, Gutierrez PS, Caldini ET, Pasqualucci CA, Dolhnikoff M, Saldiva PH. Lung pathology in fatal novel human influenza A (H1N1) infection. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;181:72–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Töpfer L, Menk M, Weber-Carstens S, Spies C, Wernecke KD, Uhrig A, Lojewski C, Jörres A, Deja M. Influenza A (H1N1) vs non-H1N1 ARDS: analysis of clinical course. J Crit Care. 2014;29:340–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Doerschuk CM. Leukocyte trafficking in alveoli and airway passages. Respir Res. 2000;1:136–40.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Buttignol M, Pires-Neto R, Ballarin M, Dolhnikoff M, Mauad T. CD8+ T cells, dendritic cells, mast cells and FOXP3 in the lungs of patients with severe influenza A (H1N1) infection [abstract]. Eur Respir J. 2014;44:58.Google Scholar
  16. Buttignol M, Pires-Neto R, Ballarin M, Dolhnikoff M, Mauad T. T and B lymphocytes, NK-cells, dendritic cells, mast cells and foxp3+ cells in lung tissue of severe Influenza A (H1N1)pdm infection [abstract]. Eur Respir J. 2015;46:23.Google Scholar
  17. Buttignol M, Pires-Neto R, Ballarin M, Rodio G, Dolhnikoff M, Mauad T. Influenza A (H1N1) virus infection is associated with increased number of CD8T+ lymphocytes and CD83+ dendritic cells in lung tissue [abstract]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;187:A4172.Google Scholar
  18. Buttignol M, Pires-Neto R, Rossi e Silva RC, Ballarin M, Dolhnikoff M, Mauad T. Immunopathology of the Airways in Severe Influenza A (H1N1)pdm Infection [abstract]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;193:A4862.Google Scholar
  19. Katzenstein A-L. Katzenstein and Askin's surgical pathology of nonneoplastic lung disease. Major problems in Pathology. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2006.Google Scholar
  20. Definition Task Force ARDS, Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, Fan E, Camporota L, Slutsky AS. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. JAMA. 2012;307:2526–33.Google Scholar
  21. Morales MM, Pires-Neto RC, Inforsato N, Lanças T, da Silva LF, Saldiva PH, Mauad T, Amato MB, Dolhnikoff M. Small airway remodeling in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a study in autopsy lung tissue. Crit Care. 2011;15:R4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Pires-Neto RC, Morales MM, Lancas T, Inforsato N, Duarte MI, Amato MB, de Carvalho CR, da Silva LF, Mauad T, Dolhnikoff M. Expression of acute-phase cytokines, surfactant proteins, and epithelial apoptosis in small airways of human acute respiratory distress syndrome. J Crit Care. 2013;28:111.e9–111.e15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Araujo BB, Dolhnikoff M, Silva LF, Elliot J, Lindeman JH, Ferreira DS, Mulder A, Gomes HA, Fernezlian SM, James A, Mauad T. Extracellular matrix components and regulators in the airway smooth muscle in asthma. Eur Respir J. 2008;32:61–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mauad T, Silva LF, Santos MA, Grinberg L, Bernardi FD, Martins MA, Saldiva PH, Dolhnikoff M. Abnormal alveolar attachments with decreased elastic fiber content in distal lung in fatal asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;170:857–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kaarteenaho R, Kinnula VL. Diffuse Alveolar Damage: A Common Phenomenon in Progressive Interstitial Lung Disorders. Pulmonary Medicine. 2011;2011:531302.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Moffat JM, Gebhardt T, Doherty PC, Turner SJ, Mintern JD. Granzyme A expression reveals distinct cytolytic CTL subsets following influenza A virus infection. Eur J Immunol. 2009;39:1203–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Harari A, Bellutti Enders F, Cellerai C, Bart PA, Pantaleo G. Distinct profiles of cytotoxic granules in memory CD8 T cells correlate with function, differentiation stage, and antigen exposure. J Virol. 2009;83:2862–71.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Reinwald S, Wiethe C, Westendorf AM, Breloer M, Probst-Kepper M, Fleischer B, Steinkasserer A, Buer J, Hansen W. CD83 expression in CD4+ T cells modulates inflammation and autoimmunity. J Immunol. 2008;180(9):5890–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Strickland DH, Fear V, Shenton S, Wikstrom ME, Zosky G, Larcombe AN, Holt PG, Berry C, von Garnier C, Stumbles PA. Persistent and compartmentalised disruption of dendritic cell subpopulations in the lung following influenza A virus infection. PLoS One. 2014;9:e11152.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Unkel B, Hoegner K, Clausen BE, Lewe-Schlosser P, Bodner J, Gattenloehner S, Janßen H, Seeger W, Lohmeyer J, Herold S. Alveolar epithelial cells orchestrate DC function in murine viral pneumonia. J Clin Invest. 2012;122:3652–64.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Graham AC, Hilmer KM, Zickovich JM, Obar JJ. Inflammatory response of mast cells during influenza A virus infection is mediated by active infection and RIG-I signaling. J Immunol. 2013;190:4676–84.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Liu B, Meng D, Wei T, Zhang S, Hu Y, Wang M. Apoptosis and pro-inflammatory cytokine response of mast cells induced by influenza A viruses. PLoS One. 2014;9:e100109.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Liebler JM, Qu ZBB, Powers MR, Rosenbaum JT. Fibroproliferation and mast cells in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Thorax. 1998;53:823–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Crowe CR, Chen K, Pociask DA, Alcorn JF, Krivich C, Enelow RI, Ross TM, Witztum JL, Kolls JK. Critical role of IL-17RA in immunopathology of influenza infection. J Immunol. 2009;183:5301–10.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Muir R, Osbourn M, Dubois AV, Doran E, Small DM, Monahan A, O'Kane CM, McAllister K, Fitzgerald DC, Kissenpfennig A, McAuley DF, Ingram RJ. Innate Lymphoid Cells Are the Predominant Source of IL-17A during the Early Pathogenesis of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;15:407–16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Bermejo-Martin JF, Ortiz de Lejarazu R, Pumarola T, Rello J, Almansa R, Ramírez P, Martin-Loeches I, Varillas D, Gallegos MC, Serón C, Micheloud D, Gomez JM, Tenorio-Abreu A, Ramos MJ, Molina ML, Huidobro S, Sanchez E, Gordón M, Fernández V, Del Castillo A, Marcos MA, Villanueva B, López CJ, Rodríguez-Domínguez M, Galan JC CR, Lietor A, Rojo S, Eiros JM, Hinojosa C, Gonzalez I, Torner N, Banner D, Leon A, Cuesta P, Rowe T, Kelvin DJ. Th1 and Th17 hypercytokinemia as early host response signature in severe pandemic influenza. Crit Care 2009;13:R201.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement