Magnetic resonance lung function – a breakthrough for lung imaging and functional assessment? A phantom study and clinical trial
© Zapke et al. 2006
Received: 14 March 2006
Accepted: 06 August 2006
Published: 06 August 2006
Chronic lung diseases are a major issue in public health. A serial pulmonary assessment using imaging techniques free of ionizing radiation and which provides early information on local function impairment would therefore be a considerably important development. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a powerful tool for the static and dynamic imaging of many organs. Its application in lung imaging however, has been limited due to the low water content of the lung and the artefacts evident at air-tissue interfaces. Many attempts have been made to visualize local ventilation using the inhalation of hyperpolarized gases or gadolinium aerosol responding to MRI. None of these methods are applicable for broad clinical use as they require specific equipment.
We have shown previously that low-field MRI can be used for static imaging of the lung. Here we show that mathematical processing of data derived from serial MRI scans during the respiratory cycle produces good quality images of local ventilation without any contrast agent. A phantom study and investigations in 85 patients were performed.
The phantom study proved our theoretical considerations. In 99 patient investigations good correlation (r = 0.8; p ≤ 0.001) was seen for pulmonary function tests and MR ventilation measurements. Small ventilation defects were visualized.
With this method, ventilation defects can be diagnosed long before any imaging or pulmonary function test will indicate disease. This surprisingly simple approach could easily be incorporated in clinical routine and may be a breakthrough for lung imaging and functional assessment.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) relies on signals emitted by hydrogen nuclei brought into a magnetic field and stimulated by an electromagnetic radio wave. The usual MRI rule is, the stronger the magnetic field, the stronger the signal. When signal strength is increased imaging is faster, the slices are thinner and the images have a better resolution. With respect to imaging the lung, we have advocated a change of paradigms and could demonstrate why less is more in lung MRI. A low magnetic field strength (0.2 T) yields a lower MR signal but also less artefacts [1–4] This reduction of the artefacts enables us to image lung tissue at low field strength.
Since the lung contains mainly air there is little tissue to give an MR signal, therefore the slice thickness of the images needs to be increased (20 to 200 mm), to produce a clear image [5–8]. We have previously shown that lung MRI is possible and that this technique can be used efficiently for fast and reliable static imaging of the lung [6–8].
Starting point of our approach to a functional (dynamic) assessment of the lung was the observation that in 'real-time' videos of low-field MRI scans grey values of the lung parenchyma changed noticeably during respiration, presumably reflecting the changing tissue/air ratio. This suggested that local ventilation could be measured without a contrast agent and without specific scanner technology, solely on the basis of the data produced by serial low-field MR images.
Calculation of ventilation, represented by a change in air content of a lung region, was carried out according to the following considerations shown as a simplified model in Fig. 1: Briefly, a defined volume (region of interest = ROI) in expiration has a defined MR signal (Sexp) depending on the content of air and lung parenchyma. At inspiration some of the voxels are replaced by air with a signal equivalent to background noise (Snoise) resulting in a signal at inspiration Sinsp. Presuming a homogeneous distribution of lung parenchyma within the ROI the total ventilation (Vabs) in ml air added during inspiration/ml lung parenchyma can now be calculated from the measured signals as
Vabs = (Sexp-Sinsp)/(Sexp-Snoise) (1)
Accordingly, the ventilation at any point of the respiratory cycle (Vact) can be calculated by the actual signal at this point (Sact) as follows
Vact = (Sexp-Sact)/(Sexp-Snoise) (2)
We performed 99 investigations for 85 patients (60 m/25 f, 3–41 years, mean age 14.1 ± 7.8 y) in a pilot study after approval by the local ethics committee. Written informed consent was given for each investigation by the patients and/or their legal guardians. The patients were divided into five groups. Healthy n = 4, asthma n = 39, cystic fibrosis (CF) n = 19, other lung disease (i.e. pneumonia) n = 17, other disease n = 6.
Imaging and postprocessing
All MR imaging was performed at 0.2T (Magnetom Open, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). The fast lung imaging was performed as described previously [7, 8]. We chose a true FISP (Fast Imaging with Steady-state Precession) sequence [8–11] modified according to the special needs of functional imaging [1, 8]. The initial images of the lung included coronal, lateral and transversal pictures in order to visualize possible morphologic changes and to calculate the lung volume. For "real time" respiration imaging we decreased the spatial resolution to 128 × 128. Repetition time TR 4.2 ms; echo time TE 2.0 ms; flip angle FA 90°; acquisition time TA 1.2 sec/image (including the preparation of the sequence). With this sequence we obtained 50 coronal images over a time period of one minute during slow, maximum amplitude respiration. To overcome the low proton density we increased the slice thickness to 60 mm. The signal was therefore strong enough for clear images of the lung. Conventional pulmonary function tests (PFT) were performed in parallel for 85 investigations. Vital capacity (vc) was chosen for comparison because of the similar breathing technique for vc in PFT and ventilation imaging using MR.
Registration and measurements
All the images were transferred to a separate workstation. To compensate for breathing motion we used a registration algorithm proposed by C. Chefd'hotel et al. [12, 13]. Registration was performed pair wise between all the images and an arbitrary reference image. For each pair , this algorithm finds a deformation that maximizes the local cross-correlation between the selected reference and the image being registered. This deformation is modelled as a smooth vector field that gives for each pixel on the reference its corresponding location on the second image. The local cross-correlation criterion was selected for its robustness to intensity changes, signal inhomogeneities, and noise. The algorithm recovers the deformation by composition of small displacements, incrementally maximizing the similarity criterion. This process, which can be seen as the numerical implementation of a transport equation, offers a large capture range, which is required for this application. Given how pathologies can affect breathing motion, we found difficult to use a physical model to constrain the recovered deformation field. Instead, a simple smoothness assumption was used, and proved very effective in practice. This algorithm was selected for its ability to register images without requiring the extraction and selection of anatomical landmarks. Note that during the breathing cycle, parts of the lungs come in and out of the coronal acquisition plane (despite the large slice thickness). This type of deformation can not be captured by the registration method.
To give a quantitative estimate of total lung ventilation and allow a comparison with PFT results, we performed ventilation measurements in six representative ROIs (Fig. 3). Total lung ventilation was extrapolated by multiplying the mean ventilation (in ml air/ml lung parenchyma) derived from those ROIs with the total lung volume determined by the static thorax MRI scans. The mean ventilation was compared to the conventional PFT of the same day.
To visualize dynamic "real time" ventilation at maximum resolution, we produced ventilation maps, calculating the signal changes between each image over the respiratory cycle. The ventilation was calculated for each pixel and colour-coded red for a decrease in air content (expiration) and green for an increase in air content (inspiration). To assess the ventilation near real-time, a video was produced for each patient showing the increase or decrease of air content in 50 images over 1 minute. Thus the ventilation of the whole lung over the respiratory cycle was evaluated (supplementary videos on request).
We considered maximum compression of the sponge to be "no ventilation" (0). The lung phantom confirmed that "ventilation" (= the increase of air in the sponge) can be calculated reliably with this MRI based method (r = 0.99; p ≤ 0.001) (Fig. 2).
Comparison of ventilation measurements.
MR ventilation (L)
2.33 ± 0.08
92.7 ± 12.7
2.29 ± 0.92
93 ± 13.9
1.98 ± 2.33
96.5 ± 21.8
2.29 ± 0.24
2.65 ± 1.19
86.9 ± 13.3
2,68 ± 1.21
89.8 ± 11.8
2,39 ± 1.03
97 ± 14.1
2,51 ± 1.45
2.51 ± 1.11
66.9 ± 20.3
2.44 ± 1.05
67.1 ± 18.9
1.7 ± 0.85
57.5 ± 25.9
2.86 ± 1.46
Other lung disease
2.21 ± 0.79
79.4 ± 16.8
2.2 ± 0.78
80.9 ± 17.5
2.05 ± 0.75
89.8 ± 21.7
2.07 ± 1.09
1.87 ± 1.58
63.2 ± 6.3
1.87 ± 1.58
67.9 ± 9.4
1.78 ± 1.7
68.3 ± 5.2
2.02 ± 1.59
2.49 ± 1.08
79.5 ± 18.1
2.49 ± 1.08
81.4 ± 17.9
2.12 ± 0.96
84.3 ± 25.6
2.49 ± 1.38
MRI ventilation measurements.
Right upper field (ml/ml)
0.38 ± 0.15
0.52 ± 0.18
0.43 ± 0.14
0.31 ± 0.13
Right middle field (ml/ml)
0.39 ± 0.14
0.53 ± 0.16
0.44 ± 0.13
0.32 ± 0.12
Right lower field (ml/ml)
0.41 ± 0.14
0.62 ± 0.10
0.45 ± 0.14
0.35 ± 0.12
Left upper field (ml/ml)
0.37 ± 0.15
0.50 ± 0.14
0.42 ± 0.15
0.31 ± 0.13
Left middle field (ml/ml)
0.38 ± 0.13
0.51 ± 0.18
0.41 ± 0.13
0.33 ± 0.10
Left lower field (ml/ml)
0.41 ± 0.14
0.65 ± 0.11
0.43 ± 0.13
0.36 ± 0.11
0.39 ± 0.13
0.55 ± 0.12
0.43 ± 0.13
0.33 ± 0.11
Mean FVC (%)
81 ± 18
93 ± 13
89 ± 12
67 ± 11
Mean VC (%)
80 ± 18
93 ± 13
87 ± 13
67 ± 20
In our pilot study 25 investigations were performed (healthy n = 1; asthma n = 16; CF n = 3; other lung disease n = 5) in persons who had a normal global PFT (vc and fev1 > 90%). However, only 5 (20%) of these were rated to have no ventilation defects in the ventilation mapping. 5 (20%) had ≤ 3, 13 (52%) > 3, and 2 (8%) diffuse ventilation defects. On the other hand, of 15 investigations (CF n = 12; other lung disease n = 2; other disease n = 1) of patients with pathologic PFT (vc and fev1 < 70%), 3 (20%) had > 3 and 12 (80%) diffuse ventilation defects.
Discussion and conclusion
These data indicate that the method presented here could be used to visualize local destruction of the lung long before an impairment can be detected by conventional PFT. Native ventilation lung MRI appears therefore to be just as good as other methods, such as helium-3 imaging, with which similar results have been reported [15–18]. Our method may even be superior with respect to cost-effectiveness and feasibility in clinical routine. One examination takes only 10–15 minutes. The method could be established for any low-field MR-scanner, no other special equipment or patient preparation is needed. Investigations can be repeated without exposing the patient to radiation or contrast agents, making it a perfect tool for studying diseases which require patients to have regular scans, such as asthma. Another significant advantage is the rapid collection of images. For ventilation mapping, images are taken about one a second, so several breathing cycles can be imaged within 1 min. This is important for studying diseases like asthma, in which local ventilation may change rapidly due to airway closure, as well as for the examination of less cooperative patients such as young children. In addition, investigations of physiological and pathophysiological processes and conditions can be performed without the application of a contrast agent which might itself alter the normal function of the lung. The advantages of local ventilation imaging have been previously discussed [19–23]. The novelty of this method is the quantitative measurement of the ventilation which can even be calculated for each voxel.
One of the basic assumptions of the method presented in the paper is that the MR signal of the lung parenchyma changes during ventilation mostly due to the different air content. Significant changes in T2* due to influences like perfusion and others would therefore diminish the accuracy of the ventilation calculation. From previous studies of our group and others it is well known, that T2* is relatively long (about 19 ms) at 0.2 T  and the signal decay is flat during the short time of measurement. Therefore the assumption of a relatively robust (against small changes in T2*) signal measurement was made, knowing this possible source of error which made a phantom and clinical validation of the method necessary.
According to our data the ventilation values seem reliable as they correlate closely with the lung function study which is the "gold standard" of ventilation assessment. However, as shown in figure 3, at high vital capacities MR ventilation may slightly underestimate the ventilation measured by global lung function tests. This problem may be caused by the slice thickness which in patients with a high vc should in future studies probably be adjusted to the thorax diameter to image as much of the lung as possible. Up to now the algorithm for morphing the lung works by matching the boundaries only. Therefore regions that expand different in the slice direction may be under- or overestimated. However the ventilation measured in the different fields is not dependent on the posterior-anterior (pa) expansion as it is measured in ml air per ml parenchyma. Therefore regions that expand more will have a higher ventilation regionally as seen in the lower lung fields. The overall ventilation however may be affected as it was calculated using the mean thorax diameter. In a future step more precise measurements of the different thorax expansions in the pa direction could overcome this problem.
At this early stage of the study, the image transformation was, in part, done manually. For registration and ventilation mapping, one image was selected on which to perform the further computational steps. At this point a critical observation of the results by the investigator is necessary to check the plausibility of the registration process. In future, automated image selection and processing should be performed easily. By imaging multiple slices, 3D ventilation maps could also be achieved in the near future. In conclusion, the method presented here has the potential to become a major improvement of pulmonary assessment for clinical purposes as well as for research.
- Deimling M: True FISP Imaging of Lung Parachyma at 0.2 Tesla. ISMRM Proceedings, Denver 2000.Google Scholar
- Durney CH, Bertolina J, Christmann R, Cutillo AG, Morris AH, Hashemi S: Calculation and Interpretion of Inhomogeneous Line Broadening in Models of Lungs and Other Heterogeneous Structures. Journal of Magnetic Resonance 1989, 85:554–570.Google Scholar
- Parizel PM, Van Riet B, Van Hasselt B, Van Goethem J, Van den Hauwe L, Dijkstra H, et al.: Influence of Magnetic Field Strength on T2* Decay and Phase Effects in Gradient Echo MRI of Vertebral Bone Marrow. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 1995, 19:465–471.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schmidt MA, Yang GZ, Gatehouse PD, Firmin DN: FID-based lung MRI at 0.5 T: theoretical considerations and practical implications. Magn Reson Med 1998, 39:666–672.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Abolmaali ND, Schmitt J, Krauss S, Bretz F, Deimling M, Jacobi V, Vogl TJ: MR imaging of lung parenchyma at 0.2 T: evaluation of imaging techniques, comparative study with chest radiography and interobserver analysis. Eur Radiol 2004, 14:703–708.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rupprecht T, Bowing B, Kuth R, Deimling M, Rascher W, Wagner M: Steady-state free precession projection MRI as a potential alternative to the conventional chest X-ray in pediatric patients with suspected pneumonia. Eur Radiol 2002, 12:2752–6..PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wagner M, Kuth R, Deimling M, Rascher W, Rupprecht T: A fast magnetic resonance imaging technique for children with mediastinal lymphoma: work in progress. Med Pediatr Oncol 2001, 37:532–6..View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wagner M, Bowing B, Kuth R, Deimling M, Rascher W, Rupprecht T: Low field thoracic MRI--a fast and radiation free routine imaging modality in children. Magn Reson Imaging 2001, 19:975–83..View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Deimling M, Heid O: Magnetization Prepared True FISP Imaging. Proceedings of the 2nd SMR, San Francisco 1994, 495–495.Google Scholar
- Haacke EM, Tkach JA: Fast MR imaging: techniques and clinical applications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990, 155:951–64..View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oppelt A, Graumann R, Barfuss H, Fischer H, Hartl W, Schajor W: FISP: A new Fast Imaging Sequence. Electromedica 1986, 3:15.Google Scholar
- Hermosillo G, Chefd'hotel C, Faugeras O: Variational methods for multimodal image matching. Int J Computer Vision 2002, 50:329–343.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chefdhotel C, Hermosillo G, Faugeras O: Flows of Diffeomorphisms for Multimodal Image Matching, Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, Washington, USA. 2002.Google Scholar
- Deninger AJ, Mansson S, Petersson JS, Pettersson G, Magnusson P, Svensson J, Fridlund B, Hansson G, Erjefeldt I, Wollmer P, Golman K: Quantitative measurement of regional lung ventilation using 3He MRI. Magn Reson Med 2002, 48:223–232.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Altes TA, de Lange EE: Applications of hyperpolarized helium-3 gas magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric lung disease. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2003, 14:231–236.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Klarreich E: Take a deep breath. Nature 2003, 424:873–874.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Samee S, Altes T, Powers P, de Lange EE, Knight-Scott J, Rakes G, Mugler JPIII, Ciambotti JM, Alford BA, Brookeman JR, Platts-Mills TA: Imaging the lungs in asthmatic patients by using hyperpolarized helium-3 magnetic resonance: assessment of response to methacholine and exercise challenge. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2003, 111:1205–1211.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zaporozhan J, Ley S, Gast KK, Schmiedeskamp J, Biedermann A, Eberle B, Kauczor HU: Functional analysis in single-lung transplant recipients: a comparative study of high-resolution CT, 3He-MRI, and pulmonary function tests. Chest 2004, 125:173–181.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- De Lange EE, Mugler III, Brookemann JR, Knight-Scott J, Truwit JD, Teates CD, et al.: Lung Air Spaces: MR Imaging Evaluation with Hyperpolarized 3He Gas. Radiology 1999, 210:851–857.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Donnelly LF, MacFall JR, McAdams HP, Majure JM, Smith J, Frush DP, Bogonad P, Charles HC, Ravin CE: Cystic fibrosis: combined hyperpolarized 3He-enhanced and conventional proton MR imaging in the lung--preliminary observations. Radiology 1999, 212:885–889.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ebert M, Grossmann T, Heil W, Otten WE, Surkau R, Leduc M, Bachert P, Knopp MV, Schad LR, Thelen M: Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging with hyperpolarised helium-3. Lancet 1996, 347:1297–1299.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kauczor HU, Kreitner KF: Contrast-enhanced MRI of the lung. Eur J Radiol 2000, 34:196–207.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Salerno M, Altes TA, Mugler JPIII, Nakatsu M, Hatabu H, de Lange EE: Hyperpolarized noble gas MR imaging of the lung: potential clinical applications. Eur J Radiol 2001, 40:33–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.