Open Access

Laminin-332 alters connexin profile, dye coupling and intercellular Ca2+ waves in ciliated tracheal epithelial cells

Respiratory Research20067:105

https://doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-7-105

Received: 24 January 2006

Accepted: 02 August 2006

Published: 02 August 2006

Abstract

Background

Tracheal epithelial cells are anchored to a dynamic basement membrane that contains a variety of extracellular matrix proteins including collagens and laminins. During development, wound repair and disease of the airway epithelium, significant changes in extracellular matrix proteins may directly affect cell migration, differentiation and events mediated by intercellular communication. We hypothesized that alterations in cell matrix, specifically type I collagen and laminin α3β3γ2 (LM-332) proteins within the matrix, directly affect intercellular communication in ciliated rabbit tracheal epithelial cells (RTEC).

Methods

Functional coupling of RTEC was monitored by microinjection of the negatively charged fluorescent dyes, Lucifer Yellow and Alexa 350, into ciliated RTEC grown on either a LM-332/collagen or collagen matrix. Coupling of physiologically significant molecules was evaluated by the mechanism and extent of propagated intercellular Ca2+ waves. Expression of connexin (Cx) mRNA and proteins were assayed by reverse transcriptase – polymerase chain reaction and immunocytochemistry, respectively.

Results

When compared to RTEC grown on collagen alone, RTEC grown on LM-332/collagen displayed a significant increase in dye transfer. Although mechanical stimulation of RTEC grown on either LM-332/collagen or collagen alone resulted in intercellular Ca2+ waves, the mechanism of transfer was dependent on matrix: RTEC grown on LM-332/collagen propagated Ca2+waves via extracellular purinergic signaling whereas RTEC grown on collagen used gap junctions. Comparison of RTEC grown on collagen or LM-332/collagen matrices revealed a reorganization of Cx26, Cx43 and Cx46 proteins.

Conclusion

Alterations in airway basement membrane proteins such as LM-332 can induce connexin reorganizations and result in altered cellular communication mechanisms that could contribute to airway tissue function.

Background

The normal tracheal airway epithelial layer is composed primarily of pseudostratified ciliated, basal and secretory cells that maintain contact with each other and to a thin basement membrane [1]. Molecules comprising the airway extracellular matrix (ECM) consist of fibrous (e.g., collagens and elastin) and structural proteins (e.g., fibronectin and laminins) embedded in a hydrated polysaccharide gel containing several glycosaminoglycans (e.g., hyaluronic acid). Laminins are one of many basement membrane ECM molecules that can contribute to cell support and signalling of the airway epithelium [2]. Laminin was initially coined as a term to describe a single ECM protein but has come to encompass a family of heterotrimeric ECM proteins made up of single α, β and γ chains. To date, there are five α, three β and three γ chains that are known to form at least 16 laminin trimers and a variety of proteolytic fragments [3]. Laminins can be produced by lung epithelial cells, including bronchial cells [4, 5]. A variety of laminins are expressed by lung epithelial cells during development and in adult tissue [611], including LM-332 (formerly Laminin-5) [5, 1214]. Differential LM-332/integrin interaction has been shown to be involved in airway epithelial wound responses in culture [15] and in vivo [13]. It is possible that the remodeling of ECM, including LM-332, by protein cleavage or structural changes can expose and/or eliminate ECM receptor binding sites and promote changes in signalling and cellular activity [16], however, direct studies on the effects of LM-332 on signalling of conducting airway cells are limited. In addition to ECM rearrangements, breach of the epithelial layer causes a redistribution of intercellular connections that are restored after reformation of the pseudostratified epithelial layer [17, 18]. As a part of normal airway defense, epithelia coordinate cellular responses to prevent damage/toxicity. Airway epithelial cells rely on paracrine signalling and gap junctional communication to coordinate defence-related activities. Gap junctions are formed at points of cell-cell contact where each cell contributes a hexameric hemi-channel made up of connexins (Cx) [19, 20]. Connexin proteins can convey unique permeability properties upon the gap junction channels, thus, alterations in connexin expression patterns can directly change the types of cell-cell communication between neighbouring cells, and contribute to local tissue response [21, 22]. Direct studies on the effect of LM-332 on intercellular signalling of conducting airway epithelial cells have not been performed.

There is a complex pattern of connexin isoform expression in airway epithelial cells with at least eight different connexins expressed at various stages of differentiation and development: Cx26, Cx30.3, Cx31.1, Cx32, Cx37, Cx40, Cx43, and Cx46 [2327]. Changes in connexin expression in upper airway epithelial cells have been associated with developing or post-injury airways in vivo [24, 25]. In vitro, functional gap junctional intercellular communication has been traditionally monitored by transfer of low molecular weight fluorescent dyes, or by measurement of electrical conductance. Although these techniques are recognized as valuable experimental tools to identify cellular coupling, they do not always reflect transfer of physiologically significant molecules through gap junctions [21, 26]. An alternative way to demonstrate gap junctional coupling in cultured airway epithelial cells is through monitoring of coordinated intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) changes in response to mechanical stimulation of a single cell [28]. However, diffusion of second messenger molecules/ions through gap junctions is not the only way Ca2+ waves can be propagated [29]. Following mechanical stimulation, cultured conducting airway epithelial cells can release nucleotides (e.g., ATP or UTP) into extracellular spaces resulting in the activation of Ca2+ signalling pathways via plasma membrane purinergic receptors [30]. These pathways need not be mutually exclusive: we have shown in primary cultures of rat alveolar epithelial cells that addition of LM-332 to collagen matrices alters the mechanism of coordinating [Ca2+]i changes among neighbouring cells [26, 3134]. These changes in the coordination of Ca2+ waves were accompanied by alterations of connexin isoform expression patterns and affected by cellular differentiation.

In this study we grew ciliated rabbit tracheal epithelial cells (RTEC) on substrates of LM-332/collagen or collagen alone and monitored functional dye coupling, propagation of intercellular Ca2+ waves following mechanical stimulation, and alterations in connexin isoform expression. We found that, independent of the matrix substratum, ciliated RTEC were functionally coupled by low molecular weight dyes, although the incidence of dye coupling was increased by LM-332. Ciliated RTEC propagated intercellular Ca2+ waves in response to mechanical stimulation on both matrices tested. However, cells grown on LM-332/collagen matrix propagated Ca2+ waves via an extracellular nucleotide pathway whereas cells grown on collagen alone propagated Ca2+ waves via gap junctions. Direct immunocytochemical staining of connexins showed a cellular rearrangement of at least three isoforms, Cx26, Cx43 and Cx46, in response to LM-332/collagen matrix. We suggest that similar changes of extracellular matrix proteins in vivo (e.g., during development, wound repair or disease) lead to changes in intercellular signalling that are important in coordinating upper airway epithelial tissue function.

Methods

Materials

Dulbeco's modified Eagle's media (DMEM), Hanks' Balanced Saline Solution, penicillin, streptomycin and amphotericin were from Gibco BRL (Grand Island, NY). Fura-2 and fura-2 acetomethoxy ester (fura-2AM) were from CalBiochem (La Jolla, CA). The connexin-mimetic peptides gap27 (amino acids SRPTEKTIFII; ADI, San Antonio, TX) and gap26 (amino acids VCYDKSFPISHVR; ADI) were used as gap junction inhibitors [26, 35]. Apyrase, Lucifer Yellow (LY; MW = 457, Da; net charge = -2), flavin mononucleoside and ATP (cat #A 2383) were from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO). LM-332 was from 804G cell culture supernatants [36]; the cell line was kindly provided by Dr. J.C.R. Jones, Northwestern University. Alexa 350 (MW = 350 Da; net charge -1) was from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR). Goat anti-rat Cx26 and goat anti-rat Cx46 and primary antibodies were from Santa Cruz Biotechnologies (Santa Cruz, CA). The mouse monoclonal anti-Cx43 antibody was from Sigma Chemical. Alexa 488-labelled secondary antibodies were from Molecular Probes. All other chemicals were purchased from Fisher Scientific (Pittsburgh, PA) or Sigma Chemical and were of the highest analytical grade.

Ciliated RTEC culture

Glass coverslips (15 mm) were coated with rat tail-collagen (primarily type I collagen), or rat tail-collagen supplemented with LM-332 rich 804G extract [36] (herein referred to as LM-332) as described [32]. RTEC cultures were prepared by methods described in [35]. Briefly, tracheas were removed from New Zealand White rabbits, the mucosa dissected and cut into small explants. After transfer to matrix-coated glass coverslips, the explants were placed in DMEM supplemented with NaHCO3, 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% antibiotic/antimycotic (penicillin, streptomycin, and amphotericin B), and cultured at 37°C in 5% CO2. Experiments were performed on 7 – 12 day old explant cultures. No morphological differences between cells grown on collagen matrix or LM-332/collagen matrix were observed (data not shown).

Functional dye coupling

RTEC cultures were washed with Hanks' Balanced Saline Solution (HBSS: 1.3 mM CaCl2, 5.0 mM KC1, 0.3 mM KH2PO4, 0.5 mM MgCl2, 0.4 mM MgSO4, 137.9 mM NaCl, 0.3 mM Na2PO4 and 1% glucose additionally buffered with 25 mM HEPES, pH 7.4) and placed in 100-cm petri dishes containing HBSS at room temp. Eppendorf femptotips (Brinkmann, Westbury, NY) were backfilled with 10 mM Tracer dye (LY or Alexa 350) in 200 mM KCl. Dye was microinjected with an Eppendorf Micromanipulator 5171/Transjector 5426 into the cytoplasm of individual ciliated cells. Subsequent dye transfer was monitored on an Olympus IX70 inverted microscope (Melville, NY) with 20× objective in phase contrast during injections and in epifluorescence mode for dye coupling analysis. Cells were considered to be functionally coupled if two or more neighbouring cells displayed fluorescence within 5 min of dye injection. Dye coupling plots in Figure 1 display percent of experiments with functional coupling (i.e., dye present in more than 2 adjacent cells 5 min following microinjection). Images were captured 5 min post-injection with a CoolSnap camera (Roper Scientific, Tucson, AZ) onto a Apple Macintosh G4 computer (Cupertino, CA). Stock solutions of gap27 were made initially at 10 mg/ml in Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS). Stock was diluted to a working concentration of 0.25 mg/ml (190 μM) in HBSS prior to experimentation. To obtain gap junction block, cells were incubated for a minimum of 45 min and up to 120 min. The nucleotidase, apyrase (50 U/ml in HBSS), was used to block paracrine signalling via ATP/UTP release [32]. Cells were washed with apyrase/HBSS for 1 – 30 min prior to experimentation.
Figure 1

Functional dye coupling in ciliated RTEC. LY (A – D) or Alexa 350 (E – H) was microinjected into a single ciliated RTEC and allowed to diffuse for 5 min. Fluorescent micrographs represent typical experiments after microinjection into RTEC grown on collagen (A, C, E, G), or LM-332/collagen (B, D, F, H). Asterisks in fluorescent micrographs denote microinjected cells. The percent of microinjection experiments with dye transfer to greater than two cells after 5 min is graphed against the individual dye (I). "^" denotes a significant change in functional coupling between RTEC grown on different matrices; "*" denotes a significant change in functional coupling between RTEC grown on the same matrix with or without gap27; "#" denotes a significant difference in functional coupling as measured by different dyes; for all significance tests, P < 0.05. Values are ± standard deviation.

Measurement of intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i)

[Ca2+]i was calculated by ratiometric analysis of fura-2 fluorescence [37]. Fura-2 fluorescence was observed on an Olympus IX70 microscope after alternating excitation at 340 and 380 nm by a 75 W Xenon lamp linked to a Delta Ram V illuminator (Photon Technologies Incorporated (PTI), Monmouth Junction, New Jersey) and a gel optic line. Images of emitted fluorescence above 505 nm were recorded by an ICCD camera (PTI) and simultaneously displayed on a 23" colour monitor. The imaging system was under software control (ImageMaster, PTI) on an IBM clone computer. A change in [Ca2+]i was considered positive if the cell increased [Ca2+]i to 200 nM or more, a two to four fold change over resting values. Intercellular Ca2+ waves were induced by mechanical stimulation of a single ciliated RTEC under piezo-electric control and performed with a glass micropipette (approx. 1 μm tip diameter) positioned near the apical membrane. The pipette was deflected downward for 150 msec to deform the cell membrane. If cell membranes were broken (as measured by loss of fura-2 dye) the experiment was not included in data analysis to prevent analysis of Ca2+ wave propagation due to extracellular diffusion of intracellular contents [30, 38]. Because the stimulated cell was included in analysis, a Ca2+ wave of one cell represented no intercellular communication. In these experiments, the field of view varied, and was limited to between 20 and 40 cells (depending on individual culture). On occasion, wave propagation would encompass more than 20 cells (or exit the field of view). Ca2+ wave propagation was given a total score of 20 cells in these cases. Because maximum numbers were imposed on cell counts, the number of cells participating in a Ca2+ wave propagation in unblocked conditions are underrepresented. Each experimental paradigm was repeated on a minimum of 3 separate RTEC cultures (except gap26 inhibition studies).

Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) detection of connexin mRNA

To assay potential differences in mRNA expression of RTEC cells used in dye transfer and Ca2+ imaging studies, tracheal explants were removed from 7–10 day old RTEC cultures and discarded. Total RNA from remaining outgrowth cells was isolated using the NucleoSpin RNAII kit (Clontech, Mountain View, CA) as per manufacturer's protocol. Isolated RNA (2 μg) was used as a template for reverse transcription with a First Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (Fermentas, Inc., Hanover, MD). Each 20 μl reaction mixture was prepared following the manufacturer's protocol with the exception of using both 0.5 μg of oligo dT primers and 0.2 μg of random hexamer primers in detection reactions. PCR reactions were carried out by mixing 2 μl of reverse transcription reaction, 5 μl of l0× PCR buffer containing 15 mM MgCl2, 1 μl of 10 mM deoxynucleoside phosphate mixture, 2 μM of PCR primer set, 0.25 μl of 5 U/μl Taq polymerase (Promega Corp., Madison, WI), and RNase/DNase free water up to 50 μl. An additional 7 μl of 25 mM MgCl2 (final concentration 5 mM) was added for Cx46 detection. Primer sequences for RT-PCR are shown in Table 1. Cx26 primer sequence was determined by inserting the NCBI rat connexin nucleotide sequences into the Primer 3 online program http://frodo.wi.mit.edu/cgi-bin/primer3/primer3_www.cgi; primer sequences for Cx43 [39], Cx46 [40], and actin [41] were adapted from published reports.
Table 1

Primer pairs for RT-PCR. Base sequences and product size for determining Cx26, Cx43, Cx46 and β-actin mRNA expression in RTEC

Gene

Upstream Sequence

Downstream Sequence

BP

Cx26

5'-CTGTCCTCTTCATCTTCCGC-3'

5'-TACGGACCTTCTGGGTTTTG-3'

306

Cx43

5'-CATTGGGGGGAAGGCGTGAGG-3'

5'-AGCGCACGTGAGAGATGGGGAAG-3'

400

Cx46

5'-GGAAAGGCCACAGGGTTTCCTGG-3'

5'-GGGTCCAGGAGGACCAACGG-3'

332

β-actin

5'-CGTGGGCCGCCCTAGGCACCA-3'

5'-TTGGCCTTAGGGTTCAGGGGGG-3'

242

Immunocytochemistry of RTEC connexins

RTEC cultures were washed twice for 5 min with PBS and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min. Cell cultures were washed with PBS, incubated with PBS supplemented with 3% BSA, 5% serum (matched to secondary antibody source), 5% fish skin gelatin and 0.25% Triton X-100 (PBS-S) for 30 min, incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies in PBS-S, and washed with PBS. Cell cultures were again incubated with PBS-S at room temperature, then incubated with secondary antibody in PBS-S for 1 hr, and washed thoroughly with PBS before being mounted for observation. Images were obtained on an Olympus Fluoview confocal microscope with a 60× WI objective (NA 0.9).

Statistics

Functional dye coupling between individual cells were tested for equality and significant differences between variables using binary population proportion statistics. In comparisons between experimental paradigms, a statistical value of P < 0.05 was used to establish significance. Histograms display incidence of cell coupling with a particular dye within 5 min ± standard deviation. The mean number of cells participating in Ca2+ waves under given conditions were compared between experiments by student t test. In comparisons between experimental paradigms a statistical value of P < 0.001 was used to establish significance. Histograms display number of cells participating in the Ca2+ wave ± standard error.

Results

Dye coupling in RTEC cultures

To investigate if extracellular matrix proteins influence gap junctional communication in tracheal airway epithelial cells, we compared functional cell coupling after microinjection of tracer dyes into ciliated RTEC grown on matrices of collagen or LM-332/collagen. Representative fluorescent micrographs at 5 min following dye injections of individual ciliated RTEC are shown in Figure 1(A–H). Microinjection of LY into ciliated RTEC grown on collagen matrices resulted in successful coupling in only 7.7% of the experiments (Figure 1A,I) whereas ciliated RTEC grown on LM-332/collagen matrix displayed a significant increase in LY dye coupling (36.4% of the experiments; Figure 1B,I). In the presence of gap junction inhibitors (gap27, gap26 data not shown), LY coupling of ciliated RTEC grown on collagen matrix remained low (Figure 1C,I) while ciliated RTEC grown on collagen/LM-332 matrix displayed a reduced incidence of coupling (20%; Figure 1D,I). Similar to LY coupling in RTEC, Alexa 350 coupling was significantly higher in the RTEC grown on LM-332/collagen (91.7%; Figure 1F,I) than when grown on collagen (42.9%; Figure 1E,I). Also similar, functional coupling of Alexa 350 was significantly reduced in the presence of gap27 (or gap26; data not shown) on both matrices tested (Figure 1G–I). Despite these similarities, ciliated RTEC showed significantly increased coupling with Alexa 350 compared to LY whether grown on collagen or LM-332/collagen (Figure 1).

Mechanically-induced Ca2+ wave propagation in RTEC grown on LM-332/collagen matrices

In previous studies, mechanical stimulation of RTEC grown on collagen matrices has been shown to result in coordinated release of intracellular Ca2+ in adjoining cells (intercellular Ca2+ wave) via a gap junctional-dependent mechanism [28, 29, 35, 42]. Representative mechanically-induced Ca2+ waves of RTEC grown on collagen matrix under control conditions and in the presence of gap27 or a nucleotidase (apyrase) to block extracellular purinergic signalling are shown in Figure 2(A–C). On collagen matrices, mechanically induced Ca2+ waves are restricted by gap junction inhibitors and not affected by nucleotidases ([35]; Figure 3A). To determine if the addition of LM-332 to a collagen matrix altered coordination of second messenger signalling between RTEC cells, we repeated these experiments with RTEC grown on LM-332/collagen matrices. Similar to RTEC grown on collagen, mechanical stimulation of a single ciliated RTEC resulted in an immediate increase in [Ca2+]i in the stimulated cell that was propagated to surrounding cells (Figure 2D). On average, 15.7 ± 0.9 cells participated in the mechanically-induced Ca2+ wave (Figure 3B), a number not significantly different to that observed in cells grown on collagen matrix [35]. However, in contrast to results from RTEC grown on collagen, gap27 did not significantly lower the size of the mechanically-induced Ca2+ wave (11.8 ± 1.3 cells; Figure 2E; Figure 3B). A second connexin mimetic peptide, gap26, also had no effect on RTEC Ca2+ wave propagation (15.3 ± 2.4 cells; Figure 3B). An additional difference in the Ca2+ wave propagation on LM-322/collagen matrices was the occasional initiation of [Ca2+]i changes in a participating cell at areas independent of cell-cell contact with an RTEC showing increased [Ca2+]i (data not shown), suggesting an extracellularly-mediated signalling event. RTEC cultures grown on LM-332/collagen matrix displayed increases in [Ca2+]i in response to external application of ATP or UTP (data not shown). In order to determine if purine release was a component of intercellular Ca2+ wave propagation, mechanical stimulation was repeated in the presence of the nucleotidase, apyrase. The addition of 50 U/ml apyrase significantly reduced the number of cells participating in a mechanically-induced Ca2+ wave in RTEC grown on LM-332/collagen matrices to 3.0 ± 0.7 cells (Figure 2F; Figure 3B). This reduction was reversed on washout of apyrase, where mechanically-induced Ca2+ waves averaged 12.0 ± 2.0 cells (Figure 3B).
Figure 2

Mechanically-induced Ca 2+ waves in RTEC plated on collagen or LM-332/collagen. Pseudo-colour maps of increases in [Ca2+]i in RTEC over time after mechanical stimulation of a single ciliated RTEC (arrow) are shown. Each horizontal image sequence displays approximate [Ca2+]i concentrations (see inset) beginning at 1 sec and following at 5 and 9 sec after mechanical stimulation. White lines in each panel approximate cell boundaries. Two separate pseudo-colour scale bars are depicted for A, B; and C – F. The first three panels represent typical Ca2+ waves in RTEC grown on collagen matrix under control conditions (A), treatment with gap27 (B), or treatment with apyrase (C). The last three panels represent typical Ca2+ waves in RTEC grown on LM-332/collagen matrix under control conditions (D), treatment with gap27 (E), or treatment with apyrase (F). Although intercellular Ca2+ communication is conserved in RTEC grown on collagen and LM-332/collagen matrices, the sensitivity to inhibitors show that the mechanism of communication is altered: RTEC grown on collagen propagate Ca2+ waves via gap junctions, whereas RTEC grown on LM-332/collagen propagate Ca2+ waves via extracellular nucleotide release.

Figure 3

Cell participation in mechanically-induced intercellular Ca 2+ waves in RTEC grown on collagen or LM-332/collagen matrices. Cells responding with an increase in [Ca2+]i after mechanical stimulation are plotted against experimental paradigms described in Figure 2. A) Data are redrawn from [35] to illustrate gap junctional mediated Ca2+ wave propagation in RTEC grown on collagen matrix. Under these conditions the gap junctional inhibitors gap26 and gap27 reversibly inhibit Ca2+ wave propagation whereas the purinergic signalling inhibitor apyrase did not have a significant effect. B) When RTEC are grown on LM-332/collagen matrix, gap27 and gap26 had no effect on Ca2+ wave propagation. In contrast, apyrase significantly inhibited propagation of Ca2+ waves that were restored to control levels within 15 min of washout. RTEC cells grown on LM-332/collagen matrix propagated intercellular Ca2+ waves via an extracellular purinergic pathway. Values are cells ± standard error. "*" indicates significant reduction from control (P < 0.01) washout (P < 0.01 for gap 26; P < 0.05 for gap27) and apyrase treatment (P < 0.05 for gap26). "#" indicates significant reduction in cell number as compared to any of the other treatments (P < 0.01 in comparison to gap26; P < 0.001 for all others).

Connexin isoform expression in RTEC grown on collagen and LM-332/collagen matrices

Because we detected differences in functional and physiological coupling in RTEC grown on differing matrices, we used RT-PCR to detect possible changes in connexin mRNA expression of three known lung epithelial connexins: Cx26, Cx43 and Cx46. No discernable matrix associated differences in connexin mRNA expression were observed (Figure 4A–B). We next used immunocytochemistry to evaluate if spatial distribution of connexin isoforms were altered by extracellular matrix (Figure 4C–H). RTEC grown on collagen matrices displayed a perinuclear staining pattern for all three connexin isoforms tested (Figure 4C,E,G) with intermittent pericellular staining in the Cx46 micrographs (Figure 4G). RTEC grown on a LM-332/collagen matrix displayed distinctly different spatial patterns of staining for each connexin tested (Figure 4D,F,H). Although Cx26 micrographs displayed perinuclear staining, an additional pericellular pattern emerged (Figure 4D), whereas the Cx43 staining pattern was almost entirely pericellular (Figure 4F). In contrast to Cx26 and Cx43, the pattern for Cx46 lost the distinct pericellular stain and displayed mostly a perinuclear pattern (Figure 4H).
Figure 4

Detection of connexin isoforms in RTEC by RT-PCR and immunocytochemistry. RT-PCR (A, B) or immunocytochemistry (C-H) were used to identify connexin isoform expression changes between RTEC grown on collagen or LM-332/collagen. Total RNA was subjected to reverse transcription followed by PCR for Cx26, Cx43, Cx46 or β-actin (A, B). No differences in mRNA products from RTEC grown on either matrix were observed. Representative immunocytochemical micrographs of RTEC grown on collagen (C, E, G) or LM-332/collagen matrices (D, F, H) stained with antibodies against Cx26, Cx43, or Cx46 are shown. On the collagen matrices, all connexin isoforms display a perinuclear staining pattern, with a pericellular staining pattern also evident in the Cx46 micrograph. On the LM-332/collagen matrices, a noticeable shift in pericellular staining is evident in Cx26 and Cx43 micrographs, whereas the most evident staining of Cx46 is perinuclear. Growth of RTEC in the presence of LM-332 alters the spatial pattern of connexin isoform expression. Arrowheads denote pericellular staining and arrows denote perinuclear staining. Bar in C represents 20 μm and is relevant to C – H.

Discussion

The airway epithelium relies on intercellular communication to coordinate cellular behaviour into tissue function. Such communication is sensitive to changes in the local environment. In this study we used fluorescent dye transfer and intercellular Ca2+ wave coupling assays to elucidate alterations in cell-cell signalling of ciliated RTEC grown on either a collagen or a LM-332/collagen matrix. Diffusion of negatively charged low molecular weight dyes between cells was significantly increased in the RTEC grown on LM-332/collagen matrices. In contrast to the significant increases in dye coupling, gap junctional coupling for physiologically-relevant second messenger molecules that help to coordinate intercellular Ca2+ waves was severely restricted when cells were grown on the LM-332/collagen matrix. Direct analysis of three connexin isoforms – Cx26, Cx43 and Cx46 – displayed a spatial redistribution coincident with matrix and functional/physiological coupling changes. Taken together, ciliated epithelial cells have distinct intercellular signalling pathways that are responsive to alterations of ECM proteins such as those occurring during development, or in response to wounding or disease.

Molecules comprising the airway ECM consist of both fibrous (e.g., collagens and elastin) and structural (e.g., fibronectin and laminins) proteins. Laminins are one of many basement membrane extracellular matrix molecules that can contribute to cell support and signalling of the developing airway [2, 5, 7, 9, 12]. The laminin isoform LM-332 can be remodelled in the conducting airway during injury or disease [6, 43, 44]. We have shown that LM-332 has profound effects on cell signalling, development and morphology in primary cultured alveolar epithelial cells [26, 3134]. In the bronchial airway epithelium, LM-332 can contribute to hemidesmosome formation [5], however, specific effects of LM-332 on cellular physiology of conducting airway epithelial cells remain ill-defined.

Direct cellular coupling through gap junctions has been traditionally monitored by transfer of low molecular weight fluorescent dyes or by measurement of electrical conductance. Both ciliated and aciliated RTEC have been shown to be electrically coupled [45]. Initial experiments reported herein focussed on the effects of LM-332 on cell-cell coupling between RTEC using fluorescent tracer molecules. In our findings, RTEC grown on collagen were poorly coupled with LY and showed a low but significantly higher coupling with Alexa 350. When RTEC were grown on collagen matrices that included LM-332, significant increases in both LY and Alexa 350 dye transfer were observed. These shifts in dye coupling in response to LM-332 matrices are similar to increased gap junctional permeability of calcein (MW 622 Da; net charge = -3) in keratinocytes grown on LM-332 and collagen matrices [46]. The fact that increase in gap junctional permeability to fluorescent markers after growth on LM-322 occurs across cell types may represent a general response to altered matrices.

Although dye coupling techniques are recognized as valuable experimental tools to identity functional gap junctions, it has become increasingly clear that gap junctions made of different connexin isoforms can also allow the differential transfer of physiologically relevant molecules [21, 47, 48]. To evaluate potential differences in the transfer of physiologically significant molecules, we initiated mechanically-induced Ca2+ waves between RTEC grown on collagen or LM-332/collagen matrices and used specific inhibitors to identify intercellular signalling pathways. A role for gap junctions in mechanically induced Ca2+ waves in RTEC grown on collagen matrices has been firmly established [28, 29, 35, 42, 4951]. In this model, mechanical stimulation induces both the opening of Ca2+ channels in the plasma membrane and an increase in 1,4,5-inositol trisphosphate (IP3) concentrations in the stimulated cell [50, 51] that can further increase [Ca2+]i of the stimulated cell through release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores. The changes in [Ca2+]i in adjacent cells is through a gap junctional mediated, IP3-dependent Ca2+ release [29, 35, 42, 51]. A role for paracrine signalling via mechanically-induced ATP or UTP release in primary cultured mouse and human airway cells has been established also [30, 52, 53]. In this model, mechanical stimulation induces release of nucleotide triphosphate that diffuses in the extracellular environment and binds to purinergic receptors on adjacent cells, activating cellular signals that lead to increases in [Ca2+]i.

In this study we show that when RTEC are grown on a LM-332/collagen matrix, mechanically-stimulated Ca2+ waves are conserved. However, inhibitor studies are consistent with a shift in the mechanism of coordination of Ca2+ changes to a paracrine/purinergic signalling pathway. Although cultured RTEC cells grown on collagen [38, 54, 55] or LM-332/collagen (data not shown) can respond to extracellular ATP or UTP by increasing [Ca2+]i, it is only the RTEC grown on LM-332/collagen that utilize purinergic signalling in response to mechanical stimulation to coordinate [Ca2+]i changes. This pronounced switch in communication mechanisms in RTEC cultures in response to LM-332 suggests that differences in mechanically-induced Ca2+ communication between rabbit [28, 29, 35, 42, 4951] and mouse or human airway epithelial cell cultures [30, 52, 53] may not be due to species-specific differences in airway signalling. Given the extensive remodelling of matrix during development, wound response and disease, mechanisms of cellular communication might also be "remodelled" at these crucial times for coordinated airway epithelial tissue function.

In an attempt to determine specific changes in gap junctions that contributed to the observed alterations in dye and second messenger coupling in RTEC, we examined directly the expression and spatial organization of three connexin isoforms: Cx26, Cx43 and Cx46. All of these isoforms showed mRNA and protein expression in RTEC after growth on either matrix, however, spatial distribution of each of these connexin isoforms was dependent on matrix. On LM-332/collagen matrices Cx26 and Cx43 isoforms were more prominent and Cx46 was less prominent at the cell membrane. These results are not entirely consistent with our previous report that examined connexin isoforms in RTEC grown on collagen [42]. Using rabbit polyclonal antibodies we detected only a slight pericellular Cx26 staining pattern, an extensive pericellular staining of Cx32, and a lack of Cx43 isoform staining. Our experience with multiple antibodies for connexin isoforms [56] allowed for a more direct probe of connexins in RTEC reported herein. The establishment of Cx26 or Cx43 gap junctions at the plasma membrane in RTEC grown on LM-332/collagen matrices may account for increased dye coupling; both Cx26 and Cx43 have been shown to increase LY transfer in transfected HeLa cells [57]. In contrast, in experiments directed at testing isoform second messenger transfer through gap junctions, neither Cx26 nor Cx43 was as efficient as Cx32 in allowing transfer of IP3 after microinjection [48]. Similar to what is shown here, increases in dye transfer do not necessarily correspond to second messenger transfer via gap junctions. Because gap junctions made of Cx32 allow for transfer of IP3 and Cx32-specific antibodies can directly inhibit Ca2+ wave propagation in RTEC grown on collagen [42], we suspect changes of this connexin isoform also occur after RTEC are grown on LM-332/collagen matrices. Additionally, we cannot rule out that Cx46 rearrangements shown herein contribute to the observed changes in second messenger coupling. As noted for dye coupling experiments above, there is precedence also for the regulation of connexin expression in response to LM-332 in the extracellular matrix [31, 32, 46]. In primary cultured alveolar epithelial cells, LM-332/collagen induced a similar change in mechanism of Ca2+ communication to that observed in RTEC cultures presented in this study [31, 32]. In addition, an upregulation of Cx26 and a downregulation of Cx43 were reported in these cells, as well as significant changes in cell morphology [31, 32, 34]. In RTEC, no apparent changes in cellular morphology, connexin protein or mRNA expression were noted when LM-332 was included in the collagen matrix. The observed LM-332 induced changes were more similar to those seen in transfected CHO cells, where a distinct translocation of Cx43 from the cytoplasm to the plasma membrane occurred in the presence of LM-332 [46].

In summary, the observed connexin re-organization in RTEC grown on collagen or LM-332/collagen matrices does not inhibit fully cellular coupling as demonstrated by the LY and Alexa 350 dye transfer, but shifts the ways in which the cells communicate an increase in [Ca2+]i. It should not be discounted that a subtle change in the pattern of Ca2+ signalling can have a significant change on the cellular physiology of the signal [58]. In addition to the effects of changes in Ca2+ signalling on cellular physiology, the direct transfer of several other second messenger/small metabolites could also be altered after connexin re-organization. ATP, ADP, glutathione, glutamate, IP3, cAMP, cGMP have all been shown to have altered permeability through gap junctions made up of different connexin isoforms [21, 47, 48, 59]. Thus, the documented changes in LM-332 during wounding, development or pathology could directly affect intercellular communication within the conducting airway epithelium to coordinate a variety of tissue responses.

Conclusion

LM-332 alters cellular signalling and gap junction permeability in rabbit tracheal epithelial cells that are associated with a change in connexin isoform organization. Unlike previous reports in rat alveolar epithelial cells, changes in permeability and connexin isoform expression occurred without obvious changes in cell morphology. We conclude that LM-332 may be an ECM signal to help shape intercellular communication and tissue function in the conducting airway.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Brian R. Duling, José F. Ek-Vitorin and Jessica A. Edwards for critical review of the manuscript, Gregory J. Seedorf for technical expertise, Terri Boitano for aid in manuscript preparation, and the Robert M. Berne Cardiovascular Research Center at the University of Virginia School of Medicine for use of the Olympus Fluoview Confocal Microscope. This study was funded by awards from the National Institute of Health HL64636, HL64039 (SB), American Lung Association Grant-in-Aid CI-1350-N (SB), an American Heart Association Beginning Grant-in-Aid 0565319U (B.E.I.) and a Robert M. Berne Cardiovascular Research Center Partners Fund Grant (B.E.I.).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, University of Virginia School of Medicine, University of Virginia Charlottesville
(2)
Robert M. Berne Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Virginia School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville
(3)
Arizona Respiratory Center, Arizona Health Sciences Center, University of Arizona
(4)
Department of Physiology, Arizona Health Sciences Center, University of Arizona

References

  1. Rennard SI, Beckmann JD, Robbins RA: Biology of airway epithelial cells. In The Lung: Scientific Foundations. Edited by: Crystal RG, West JB. New York: Raven Press; 1990:157–167.Google Scholar
  2. Sannes PL, Wang J: Basement membranes and pulmonary development. Exp Lung Res 1997, 23:101–108.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Aumailley M, Bruckner-Tuderman L, Carter WG, Deutzmann R, Edgar D, Ekblom P, Engel J, Engvall E, Hohenester E, Jones JC, Kleinman HK, Marinkovich MP, Martin GR, Mayer U, Meneguzzi G, Miner JH, Miyazaki K, Patarroyo M, Paulsson M, Quaranta V, Sanes JR, Sasaki T, Sekiguchi K, Sorokin LM, Talts JF, Tryggvason K, Uitto J, Virtanen I: A simplified laminin nomenclature. Matrix Biol 2005, 24:326–332.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dunsmore SE, Lee YC, Martinez-Williams C, Rannels DE: Synthesis of fibronectin and laminin by type II pulmonary epithelial cells. Am J Physiol 1996, 270:L215–223.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Michelson PH, Tigue M, Jones JC: Human bronchial epithelial cells secrete laminin 5, express hemidesmosomal proteins, and assemble hemidesmosomes. J Histochem Cytochem 2000, 48:535–544.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Altraja A, Laitinen A, Virtanen I, Kampe M, Simonsson BG, Karlsson SE, Hakansson L, Venge P, Sillastu H, Laitinen LA: Expression of laminins in the airways in various types of asthmatic patients: a morphometric study. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 1996, 15:482–488.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Pierce RA, Griffin GL, Miner JH, Senior RM: Expression patterns of laminin alpha1 and alpha5 in human lung during development. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2000, 23:742–747.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Pierce RA, Griffin GL, Mudd MS, Moxley MA, Longmore WJ, Sanes JR, Miner JH, Senior RM: Expression of laminin alpha3, alpha4, and alpha5 chains by alveolar epithelial cells and fibroblasts. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 1998, 19:237–244.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Mizushima H, Koshikawa N, Moriyama K, Takamura H, Nagashima Y, Hirahara F, Miyazaki K: Wide distribution of laminin-5 gamma 2 chain in basement membranes of various human tissues. Horm Res 1998,50(Suppl 2):7–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Virtanen I, Tani T, Back N, Happola O, Laitinen L, Kiviluoto T, Salo J, Burgeson RE, Lehto VP, Kivilaakso E: Differential expression of laminin chains and their integrin receptors in human gastric mucosa. Am J Pathol 1995, 147:1123–1132.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Nguyen NM, Senior RM: Laminin isoforms and lung development: All isoforms are not equal. Dev Biol 2006, 294:271–279.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Coraux C, Meneguzzi G, Rousselle P, Puchelle E, Gaillard D: Distribution of laminin 5, integrin receptors, and branching morphogenesis during human fetal lung development. Dev Dyn 2002, 225:176–185.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Lappi-Blanco E, Kaarteenaho-Wiik R, Salo S, Sormunen R, Maatta M, Autio-Harmainen H, Soini Y, Paakko P: Laminin-5 γ2 chain in cryptogenic organizing pneumonia and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004, 169:27–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Nguyen NM, Pulkkinen L, Schlueter JA, Meneguzzi G, Uitto J, Senior RM: Lung development in laminin gamma2 deficiency: abnormal tracheal hemidesmosomes with normal branching morphogenesis and epithelial differentiation. Respir Res 2006, 7:28.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. White SR, Dorscheid DR, Rabe KF, Wojcik KR, Hamann KJ: Role of very late adhesion integrins in mediating repair of human airway epithelial cell monolayers after mechanical injury. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 1999, 20:787–796.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Davis GE, Bayless KJ, Davis MJ, Meininger GA: Regulation of tissue injury responses by the exposure of matricryptic sites within extracellular matrix molecules. Am J Pathol 2000, 156:1489–1498.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Rennard SI: Repair mechanisms in asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1996, 98:S278–286.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Schneeberger EL, Lynch RD: Airway and alveolar epithelial cell junctions. In The Lung Scientific Foundations. Edited by: Crystal RG, West JB, Weibel ER, Barnes PJ. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven; 1997:505–515.Google Scholar
  19. Saez JC, Berthoud VM, Branes MC, Martinez AD, Beyer EC: Plasma membrane channels formed by connexins: their regulation and functions. Physiol Rev 2003, 83:1359–1400.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Evans WH, Martin PE: Gap junctions: structure and function. Mol Membr Biol 2002, 19:121–136.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Goldberg GS, Lampe PD, Nicholson BJ: Selective transfer of endogenous metabolites through gap junctions composed of different connexins. Nat Cell Biol 1999, 1:457–459.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Nicholson BJ, Weber PA, Cao F, Chang H, Lampe P, Goldberg G: The molecular basis of selective permeability of connexins is complex and includes both size and charge. Braz J Med Biol Res 2000, 33:369–378.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Koval M: Sharing signals: connecting lung epithelial cells with gap junction channels. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2002, 283:L875–893.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Carson JL, Collier AM, Hu SC, McLachlan JB: Variability in distribution and populations of gap junctions in ferret trachea during postnatal development. Am J Physiol 1995, 268:L576–583.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Carson JL, Reed W, Moats-Staats BM, Brighton LE, Gambling TM, Hu SC, Collier AM: Connexin 26 expression in human and ferret airways and lung during development. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 1998, 18:111–119.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Isakson BE, Seedorf GJ, Lubman RL, Evans WH, Boitano S: Cell-cell communication in heterocellular cultures of alveolar epithelial cells. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2003,29(5):552–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Haefliger JA, Bruzzone R, Jenkins NA, Gilbert DJ, Copeland NG, Paul DL: Four novel members of the connexin family of gap junction proteins. Molecular cloning, expression, and chromosome mapping. J Biol Chem 1992, 267:2057–2064.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Sanderson MJ, Charles AC, Dirksen ER: Mechanical stimulation and intercellular communication increases intracellular Ca 2+ in epithelial cells. Cell Regul 1990, 1:585–596.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Boitano S, Dirksen ER, Sanderson MJ: Intercellular propagation of calcium waves mediated by inositol trisphosphate. Science 1992, 258:292–295.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Homolya L, Steinberg TH, Boucher RC: Cell to cell communication in response to mechanical stress via bilateral release of ATP and UTP in polarized epithelia. J Cell Biol 2000, 150:1349–1360.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Isakson BE, Evans WH, Boitano S: Intercellular Ca 2+ signaling in alveolar epithelial cells through gap junctions and by extracellular ATP. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2001, 280:L221-L228.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Isakson BE, Lubman RL, Seedorf GJ, Boitano S: Modulation of pulmonary alveolar type II cell phenotype and communication by extracellular matrix and KGF. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2001, 281:C1291–1299.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Isakson BE, Seedorf GJ, Lubman RL, Boitano S: Heterocellular cultures of pulmonary alveolar epithelial cells grown on laminin-5 supplemented matrix. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 2002, 38:443–449.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Olsen CE, Isakson BE, Seedorf GJ, Lubman RL, Boitano S: Extracellular matrix driven alveolar epithelial cell differentiation in vitro . Exp Lung Res 2005, 31:461–482.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Boitano S, Evans WH: Connexin mimetic peptides reversibly inhibit Ca 2+ signaling through gap junctions in airway cells. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2000, 279:L623–630.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Baker SE, DiPasquale AP, Stock EL, Quaranta V, Fitchmun M, Jones JC: Morphogenetic effects of soluble laminin-5 on cultured epithelial cells and tissue explants. Exp Cell Res 1996, 228:262–270.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Grynkiewicz G, Poenie M, Tsien RY: A new generation of Ca 2+ indicators with greatly improved fluorescence properties. J Biol Chem 1985, 260:3440–3450.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Hansen M, Boitano S, Dirksen ER, Sanderson MJ: Intercellular calcium signaling induced by extracellular adenosine 5'-triphosphate and mechanical stimulation in airway epithelial cells. J Cell Sci 1993, 106:995–1004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Leung DS, Unsicker K, Reuss B: Expression and developmental regulation of gap junction connexins cx26, cx32, cx43 and cx45 in the rat midbrain-floor. Int J Dev Neurosci 2002, 20:63–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Abraham V, Chou ML, DeBolt KM, Koval M: Phenotypic control of gap junctional communication by cultured alveolar epithelial cells. Am J Physiol 1999, 276:L825–834.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Vandewalle A, Cluzeaud F, Bens M, Kieferle S, Steinmeyer K, Jentsch TJ: Localization and induction by dehydration of C1C-K chloride channels in the rat kidney. Am J Physiol 1997, 272:F678–688.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Boitano S, Dirksen ER, Evans WH: Sequence-specific antibodies to connexins block intercellular calcium signaling through gap junctions. Cell Calcium 1998, 23:1–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Amin K, Janson C, Seveus L, Miyazaki K, Virtanen I, Venge P: Uncoordinated production of Laminin-5 chains in airways epithelium of allergic asthmatics. Respir Res 2005, 6:110.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Patarroyo M, Tryggvason K, Virtanen I: Laminin isoforms in tumor invasion, angiogenesis and metastasis. Semin Cancer Biol 2002, 12:197–207.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Sanderson MJ, Chow I, Dirksen ER: Intercellular communication between ciliated cells in culture. Am J Physiol 1988, 254:C63–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Lampe PD, Nguyen BP, Gil S, Usui M, Olerud J, Takada Y, Carter WG: Cellular interaction of integrin alpha3beta1 with laminin 5 promotes gap junctional communication. J Cell Biol 1998, 143:1735–1747.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Bevans CG, Kordel M, Rhee SK, Harris AL: Isoform composition of connexin channels determines selectivity among second messengers and uncharged molecules. J Biol Chem 1998, 273:2808–2816.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Niessen H, Harz H, Bedner P, Kramer K, Willecke K: Selective permeability of different connexin channels to the second messenger inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate. J Cell Sci 2000, 113:1365–1372.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Sanderson MJ, Charles AC, Boitano S, Dirksen ER: Mechanisms and function of intercellular calcium signaling. Mol Cell Endocrinol 1994, 98:173–187.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Boitano S, Sanderson MJ, Dirksen ER: A role for Ca 2+ -conducting ion channels in mechanically-induced signal transduction of airway epithelial cells. J Cell Sci 1994, 107:3037–3044.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Hansen M, Boitano S, Dirksen ER, Sanderson MJ: A role for phospholipase C activity but not ryanodine receptors in the initiation and propagation of intercellular calcium waves. J Cell Sci 1995, 108:2583–2590.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Lazarowski ER, Homolya L, Boucher RC, Harden TK: Direct demonstration of mechanically induced release of cellular UTP and its implication for uridine nucleotide receptor activation. J Biol Chem 1997, 272:24348–24354.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Lazarowski ER, Boucher RC: UTP as an extracellular signaling molecule. News Physiol Sci 2001, 16:1–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Woodruff ML, Chaban W, Worley CM, Dirksen ER: PKC role in mechanically induced Ca 2+ waves and ATP-induced Ca 2+ oscillations in airway epithelial cells. Am J Physiol 1999, 276:L669–678.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Evans JH, Sanderson MJ: Intracellular calcium oscillations induced by ATP in airway epithelial cells. Am J Physiol 1999, 277:L30–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Isakson BE, Damon DN, Day KH, Liao Y, Duling BR: Connexin40 and connexin43 in mouse aortic endothelium: evidence for coordinated regulation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2006, 290:H1199-H1205.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Elfgang C, Eckert R, Lichtenberg-Frate H, Butterweck A, Traub O, Klein RA, Hulser DF, Willecke K: Specific permeability and selective formation of gap junction channels in connexin-transfected HeLa cells. J Cell Biol 1995, 129:805–817.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Berridge MJ: Unlocking the secrets of cell signaling. Annu Rev Physiol 2005, 67:1–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Locke D, Stein T, Davies C, Morris J, Harris AL, Evans WH, Monaghan P, Gusterson B: Altered permeability and modulatory character of connexin channels during mammary gland development. Exp Cell Res 2004, 298:643–660.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Isakson et al. 2006

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement