Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Importance of Aspergillus spp. isolation in Acute exacerbations of severe COPD: prevalence, factors and follow-up: the FUNGI-COPD study

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 2,
  • 3,
  • 4,
  • 5 and
  • 1Email author
Contributed equally
Respiratory Research201415:17

https://doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-15-17

  • Received: 15 September 2013
  • Accepted: 27 December 2013
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) are often associated with infectious agents, some of which may be non-usual, including Aspergillus spp. However, the importance of Aspergillus spp. in the clinical management of AECOPD still remains unclear.

Objectives

The aims of the study were to analyze the prevalence and risk factors associated with Aspergillus spp. isolation in AECOPD, and to investigate the associated clinical outcomes during a 1-year follow-up period.

Methods

Patients presenting with an AECOPD requiring hospitalization were prospectively included from four hospitals across Spain. Clinical, radiological and microbiological data were collected at admission and during the follow-up period (1, 6 and 12 months after discharge), and re-admissions and mortality data collected during the follow-up.

Results

A total of 240 patients with severe AECOPD were included. Valid sputum samples were obtained in 144 (58%) patients, and in this group, the prevalence of Aspergillus spp. isolation was 16.6% on admission and 14.1% at one-year follow-up. Multivariate logistic-regression showed that AECOPD in the previous year (OR 12.35; 95% CI, 1.9-29.1; p < 0.001), concurrent isolation of pathogenic bacteria (OR 3.64; 95% CI 1.65-9.45, p = 0.001) and concomitant isolation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (OR 2.80; 95% IC, 1.81-11.42; p = 0.001) were the main risk factors for Aspergillus spp. isolation.

Conclusions

The main risk factors for Aspergillus spp. isolation were AECOPD in the previous year and concomitant isolation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. However, although Aspergillus spp. is often isolated in sputum samples from patients with AECOPD, the pathogenic and clinical significance remains unclear.

Keywords

  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patient
  • Sputum Sample
  • Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbation

Introduction

Exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are frequent events in the natural history of the disease, increasing mortality especially when patients require hospitalization [1, 2]. Acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) are characterized clinically by worsening of dyspnoea, increased sputum production and/or changes in sputum purulence [3]. There is evidence suggesting that some infectious agents, typically respiratory viruses and bacteria, increase bronchial and systemic inflammation, which is commonly seen in AECOPD [4, 5].

Overall, these microbial agents account for the etiology of 75% of AECOPD, particularly in Anthonisen Type I exacerbations [6]. However, the role of non-usual microorganisms such as Aspergillus spp. has not been well established. Previous published data investigating Aspergillus spp. in COPD are retrospective [7] or were conducted in a small series of patients [8]. However, Aspergillus spp. may be responsible for important clinical events from saprophytic colonization of the airways to rapidly invasive and life-threatening disseminated diseases, depending on the host immune status and the presence of underlying lung disease [9]. Patients with severe COPD who often receive broad-spectrum antibiotics and corticosteroids are now acknowledged to be one of the main risk groups for pulmonary aspergillosis [10, 11].

As little is known about the risk of pulmonary aspergillosis in severe COPD patients, some retrospective studies have analyzed the incidence of Aspergillus fumigatus isolation from lower respiratory tract samples in non-immunocompromised patients and shown that COPD patients are an important group which are affected by either colonization or proven aspergillosis [12].

In one of the largest studies investigating the prevalence of Aspergillus spp. from Aspergillus respiratory samples in a cohort of critically ill patients, positive cultures Aspergillus occurred in 36 out of a total of 1756 patients, and Aspergillus treatment with steroids (odds ratio (OR) = 4.5) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR = 2.9) were significantly associated with Aspergillus spp. isolation in their multivariate analysis [13]. However, it remains unclear why some COPD patients are colonized by Aspergillus spp. whereas others develop invasive pulmonary disease. Colonization may correspond to a temporary passage of Aspergillus spp. in the airways, long-term benign carriage, or a sign of preceding invasive disease [1417]. However, the absence of prospective studies designed to determine the prevalence of Aspergillus spp. airway colonization Aspergillusin patients with AECOPD means that it has not been possible to define the influence of this organism as a causal agent of exacerbations.

Thus, the aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence, risk factors and clinical evolution associated with the respiratory isolation of Aspergillus spp. in a cohort of COPD patients requiring admission to the hospital with an AECOPD.

Methods

Study data and design

Data was prospectively collected from patients hospitalized due to a severe COPD exacerbation in four tertiary university teaching hospitals in Spain between January 2008 and December 2009. Ethics Approval Committee (CEIC 2008/4325) and all patients provided written informed consent.

Definitions

A complete definition of COPD, severe COPD exacerbation and pulmonary Aspergillus spp. infection.

Study protocol

Only COPD patients with GOLD confirmed by spirometry were included. Patients were evaluated for inclusion in the study within the first 24 hours after admission to the Emergency Department. Diagnosis of COPD exacerbation, decision to hospitalize, time of discharge and choice of pharmacological therapy were taken by the physician in charge. Patients with active tuberculosis, asthma, immunosuppression (innate or acquired) or any other clinical respiratory diseases were excluded. All patients discharged after an AECOPD were scheduled for follow-up visits at one, six and 12 months. Each patient was only included once in the analysis, despite the possibility of more than one re-admission during the follow-up period.

Data collection

Demographic variables, presence of any comorbid conditions (heart, renal, neurologic and liver disease, diabetes or cancer), smoking status, perceived dyspnoea and use of pharmacotherapy (including COPD baseline treatment, antibiotics, and anti-pneumococcal and/or flu vaccination) were recorded on admission to hospital. Symptoms/signs of the AECOPD together with physiological and laboratory data were collected at onset. Other variables such as length of stay (LOS), frequency of patients in whom admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) was needed, or requirement of non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) were also recorded.

The number of AECOPD events in the year preceding hospitalization was assessed based on recorded data and a search of the database of all hospital contacts. Only exacerbations requiring emergency room visits or admissions were included.

Microbiological analysis

Spontaneous sputum samples were obtained on admission and in each follow-up visit where possible. Sputum was examined for leukocytes and epithelial cells by gram stain, and samples with a Murray-Washington classification criteria IV (10-25 epithelial cells and >25 leukocytes per field) or V (≤10 epithelial cells and >25 leukocytes per field) were considered representative of distal airways and subsequently processed for culture. Bacterial growth was assessed at 48 hours and fungal growth after 72 hours. The airway bacteria cultured were classified into potential pathogenic microorganisms (PPMs) and non-PPMs, as previously described [5]. Samples were processed by the reference clinical microbiology laboratories of the participating hospitals using standard procedures, including Sabouraud agar culture, for the isolation of fungal species. Cultures were incubated at 32°C-37°C for at least 7 days and the number of visible colonies recorded. After seven days, filamentous colonies were examined and Aspergillus spp. identified based on macroscopic and microscopic methods.

Statistical analysis

Data were analysed using SPSS version 17.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Categorical variables are presented as absolute numbers and relative frequencies, while continuous variables are presented as the mean, standard deviation (SD) in parametric data, or median with the interquartile (IQR) range in non-parametric data. Categorical variables were compared using the χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. For the comparison of continuous variables, the t test was used if normality was demonstrated; otherwise, the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test was performed.

In order to determine the risk factors associated with the presence of Aspergillus spp. in the airways, we used both univariate and multivariate logistic regression model, where the dependent variable was the isolation of Aspergillus spp. in patients at admission, and independent variables were those associated with demographics and clinical factors. The association between follow-up visits was analyzed using the Wilcoxon test for quantitative variables and McNemar test for dichotomous discrete variables. We checked the assumptions of normality necessary to use parametric tests. All tests were two-tailed and significance was set at 5%. Bonferrioni correction was used when needed.

Results

A total of 307 possible eligible patients presenting to the emergency department with a severe exacerbation of COPD were evaluated. Of these, 62 patients presented with one or more exclusion criteria (Figure 1). In the remaining 245 cases, an alternative diagnose was recorded at discharge in 5 patients (2%) and they were excluded from the analysis. Therefore, the study population included for analysis comprised of 240 patients.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Flow diagram of patient inclusion.

Baseline and clinical characteristics

The cohort recruited consisted predominantly of men (217 [90%]; mean ± SD age 74.4 ± 8.8 years) and current smokers (172 [72.6%]). The patients had evidence of severe airway obstruction (mean FEV1 of 44.0 ± 14.6% predicted). Previous history of COPD exacerbations was very common, with 64.2% of patients having had at least one severe exacerbation in the year preceding the index hospitalization (mean 2.88 ± 2.27, maximum 6 exacerbations), and among this group, 39% were re-admitted to the hospital.

Of all the patients included, 170 (70.8%) had previously received pharmacological treatment for their COPD with a fixed combination of long acting β2-agonists (LABA) and inhaled corticosteroids (ICS): formoterol plus budesonide in 52 patients (30.6%) and fluticasone plus salmeterol in 118 patients (69.4%). 174 (72.5%) patients had received the influenza vaccine and 101 (42.1%) had received the pneumococcal vaccine.

Analysis of bacterial colonization in the previous year showed that 85 patients (35.4%) had microbiological evidence of bacterial colonization in the year prior to inclusion. The clinical characteristics of the overall population included patients by Aspergillus spp. isolation is shown in Table 1. There was no significant difference in clinical characteristics between the two groups (Aspergillus spp. isolation versus no Aspergillus spp. isolation). The clinical, physiological and laboratory features of the AECOPD on admission and the subsequent outcomes of the patients are shown in Table 2.
Table 1

Characteristics of the study population on admission based on Aspergillus spp. isolation

 

All patients (n = 240)

No Aspergillusspp. isolation (n = 120)#

Aspergillusspp. isolation (n = 24)#

p-value†

Age, years

74.4 ± 8.8

74.2 ± 10.1

73.1 ± 8.2

0.569

Gender, males

217 (90.4)

103 (85.8)

23 (95.8)

0.246

 Past-smoker

175 (72.6)

87(72.5)

18 (75.0)

0.608

 Current smoker

65 (27.4)

33 (27.5)

6 (25.0)

0.779

FEV1% predicted

2.6 (1-3)

47.3 ± 12.9

45.4 ± 14.7

0.196

FVC% predicted

44.0 ± 14.6

71.9 ± 14.4

68.8 ± 16.4

0.094

Charlson index

69.6 ± 19.6

2.1 (1.3-3.4)

2.7 (1.6-3.9)

0.060

 GOLD stage II

12 (5,8)

8 (6.6)

-

-

 GOLD stage III

92 (38,3)

46 (38.3)

8 (33.3)

0.436

 GOLD stage IV

136 (56,1)

66 (55.5)

16 (66.6)

0.062

COPD exacerbation in the previous year

    

 ≤ 2 exacerbations

82 (53.2)

65 (63.7)

7 (38.8)

0.150

 >2 exacerbations

72 (46.7)

37 (36.3)

11 (61.1)

0.050

Admission for COPD in the previous year

2.6 ± 1.9

2.1 ± 0.8

2.4 ± 1.2

0.079

Long Term Oxygen Therapy

72 (30.0)

36 (29.1)

9 (37.5)

0.067

Cardiovascular disease1

131 (54.6)

61 (50.8)

12 (50.0)

0.475

Arterial hypertension2

112 (46.7)

52 (43.3)

19 (79.2)

0.002

Diabetes mellitus

65 (27.1)

31 (25.8)

9 (37.5)

0.206

Chronic renal disease

34 (14.2)

15 (12.5)

6 (25.0)

0.052

Inhaled corticosteroids

170 (70.8)

85 (70.8)

18 (75.0)

0.763

 <500 mcg daily

106 (62.3)

54 (43.5)

12 (66.6)

0.096

 >500 mcg daily

64 (37.6)

31 (36.5)

6 (33.3)

0.267

Oral corticosteroids

80 (33.3)

39 (32.5)

9 (37.5)

0.284

Data are presented as means ± SD, medians (Interquartile range) or absolute numbers (%), as appropriate. 1Patients with cardiovascular disease other than arterial hypertension; 2Patients with arterial hypertension without any other cardiovascular condition. #Data calculated from the total number of respiratory samples. † p-value refers only to the comparison between non-aspergillus and Aspergillus isolated populations.

Table 2

Clinical characteristics of AECOPD at admission and outcomes

 

All patients

No Aspergillusspp. isolation

Aspergillusspp.isolation

p-value †

(n = 240)

(n = 120)#

(n = 24)#

Heart rate, beats/min

96.8 ± 16.1

94.7 ± 14.8

95.6 ± 13.4

0.624

Respiratory rate, breath/min

23.3 ± 8.9

22.4 ± 9.7

24.7 ± 7.6

0.286

Body temperature, °C

36.7 ± 0.9

36.4 ± 0.8

36.8 ± 0.9

0.574

Type of exacerbation £

    

 Type I

110 (45.8)

56 (46.6)

10 (41.6)

0.340

 Type II

59 (24.3)

30 (25.0)

5 (20.8)

0.127

 Type III

81 (33.4)

34 (28.3)

9 (37.5)

0.193

Laboratory findings

    

 Leucocytes, x 109/L

11.8 ± 6.3

11.2 ± 5.9

12.0 ± 4.3

0.391

 C-reactive protein, mg/dL

3.2 (1.2-12.3)

2.9 (1.2-13.5)

3.4 (1.6-9-4)

0.192

 pH

7.376 ± 0.064

7.401 ± 0.035

7.363 ± 0.078

0.286

 PaO2, mmHg

63.1 ± 22.7

64.6 ± 15.7

61.5 ± 17.9

0.141

 PaCO2, mmHg

47.8 ± 13.3

45.5 ± 12.8

49.4 ± 17.2

0.096

MV§ requirements on admission

9 (3.7)

8 (6.6)

1 (4.2)

0.297

Length of stay, days

9.6 ± 6.4

7.5 ± 5.0

11.8 ± 9.2

0.025

30-days follow-up

    

 Exacerbations, n

58 (24.1)

29 (24.1)

6 (25.0)

0.540

 Hospital re-admissions

34 (14.1)

17 (14.2)

3 (12.5)

0.345

 Death by any cause

11 (4.6)

6 (5.0)

1 (4.2)

0.478

12-month follow-up

    

 Exacerbations

131 (54.5)

72 (60.0)

12 (54.4)

0.299

 Hospital re-admissions

93 (38.7)

52 (43.3)

7 (31.8)

0.087

 ICU admissions

14 (5.8)

8 (6.6)

2 (9.0)

0.065

 Death by any cause

27 (11.3)

13 (10.8)

3 (12.5)

0.373

Data are presented as means ± SD, medians (1st quartile; 3rd quartile) or numbers (%) as appropriate. #Data calculated from the number of valid samples. £Anthonisen exacerbation criteria [4]; £ MV, Mechanical ventilation. † p-value refers only to the comparison between non-aspergillus and Aspergillus isolated populations.

Microbiological findings and prevalence of Aspergillus isolation

Sputum of sufficient quality for bacterial and fungal culture was obtained from 144 patients on admission. During the initial admission and the subsequent follow-up visits, a total of 198 sputum samples were collected. Non-PPMs were isolated in 112 (57%), whilst PPMs were found in 86 (43%). Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most frequently isolated PPM (27%). The full distribution of PPMs is shown in Table 3. 28 (14%) out of the 198 sputum samples had Aspergillus spp. isolated from 24 COPD patients. Only four patients, had Aspergillus spp. isolated in two different samples during the follow-up period. Aspergillus fumigatus was isolated in 25 cases, Aspergillus niger in two, and Aspergillus flavus in one.
Table 3

Cumulative identification and incidence of potential pathogenic microorganisms (PPM) cultured from COPD patients £

 

No Aspergillusspp. isolation

Aspergillusspp. isolation

Total

p-value

Sputum samples

170

28

198

 

Samples with PPM § cultures

66 (38.8)

20 (71.4)

86 (43)

0.024

Haemophilus influenzae

13 (7.6)

5 (17.8)

18 (9.1)

0.246

Streptococcus pneumoniae

11 (6.4)

2 (7,1)

13 (6.6)

0.626

Staphylococcus aureus

9 (5.3)

3 (10.7)

12 (6.1)

0.372

Moraxella catarrhalis

9 (5.3)

1 (3.6)

9 (5.1)

0.564

Enterobacter spp.

3 (1.8)

1 (3.6)

4 (2.0)

0.632

Klebsiella pneumoniae

2 (1.2)

-

2 (1.1)

-

Escherichia coli

4 (2.3)

-

4 (2.0)

-

Serratia marcescens

2 (1.2)

-

2 (1.1)

-

Pseudomonas aeruginosa

14 (8.2)

9 (32.1)

23 (11.6)

0.042

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia

2 (1.1)

-

2 (1.1)

-

Aspergillus fumigatus

-

25 (89.3)

25 (12.6)

-

Aspergillus spp.*

-

3 (10.7)

3 (1.5)

-

Samples with non-PPM # cultures

104 (61.2)

8 (28.6)

112 (56.6)

0.063

Haemophilus parainfluenzae

14 (8.2)

2 (7.1)

16 (8.1)

0.674

Streptococcus viridans

41 (24.1)

2 (7.1)

43 (21.7)

0.135

Staphylococcus epidermidis

14 (8.2)

-

14 (7.1)

-

Corynebacterium spp.

8 (4.7)

-

8 (4.0)

-

Neisseria spp.

6 (3.5)

-

6 (3.0)

-

Mixed upper airways flora

21 (12.3)

4 (14.3)

25 (12.6)

0.78

£ All comparisons have been calculated in valid sputum samples obtained in each group. *Aspergillus spp.: Aspergillus niger (2), Aspergillus flavus (1); § PPM, Pathogenic microorganisms; # non-PPM, Non-pathogenic microorganisms.

The prevalence of Aspergillus spp. isolation in this cohort of COPD patients was 16.6% on admission and 14.1% at the end of the follow-up period.

Due to clinical concern that doubtful pulmonary infiltrates seen on chest X-ray at admission may represent possible invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA), according to Bulpas’s criteria (16), a high resolution computed thoracic (HRCT) scan was performed in 18 of the 24 patients (75%) with Aspergillus isolation. No features of IPA were observed in any patient. Nevertheless, in five patients, their treating physicians decided to start antifungal treatment due to previous exposure to oral corticosteroids (voriconazole in three cases and itraconazole in two).

Risk factors for Aspergillus isolation

Previous bacterial colonization, the number of previous COPD exacerbations that required hospital visits (emergency room visit or admission) and the presence of arterial hypertension were significantly more frequent in patients with Aspergillus spp. isolation. Patients with Aspergillus spp. isolation in their sputum samples, had experienced more than two previous episodes of AECOPD compared to those patients without Aspergillus spp. isolation (61 versus 11, p = 0.05).

Analysis of the microbiological data in the overall population prior to admission, showed a significant association between previous bacterial colonization and the isolation of Aspergillus spp. (42 versus 11, p = 0.002). Similarly, there was a significant association between the presence of PPMs in sputum samples collected during the study period and concurrent isolation of Aspergillus spp compared to those patients without PPMs but with Aspergillus spp. isolation (66 versus 20, p = 0.02). This difference was also significant in cases with previous isolation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (14 versus 9, p = 0.04).

Table 4 summarizes the results of the multivariate analysis of risk factors potentially associated with Aspergillus spp. isolation. Significant variables associated independently with Aspergillus spp. isolation were arterial hypertension (OR 4.72; 95% confidential interval (CI), 1.56-14.29; p < 0.001), COPD exacerbation that required hospitalization in the last year (OR 12.35; 95% CI, 1.87-29.14; p < 0.001), concurrent PPMs isolation (OR 3.64; 95% CI, 1.65-9.45; p = 0.001), and concomitant isolation on the same sample of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (OR 2.80; 95% CI, 1.81-11.42; p = 0.001).
Table 4

Significant univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis for the prediction of Aspergillus spp. risk factors

 

Univariate analysis

Multivariate analysis

 

OR

95%CI

p-value

OR

95%CI

p-value

Arterial hypertension

6.48

1.17-35.84

0.032

4.72

1.56-14.39

0.001

Cardio vascular disease

9.97

1.30-76.47

0.027

-

-

-

Diabetes mellitus

3.52

1.77-15.94

0.041

-

-

-

Chronic renal disease

2.92

2.23-15.35

0.070

-

-

-

COPD exacerbation in the previous year §

2.60

1.16-6.11

0.050

12.35

1.87-29.14

<0.001

Previous bacterial colonization

3.50

1.47-8.37

0.002

-

-

-

Concurrent PPM isolation £

2.92

1.42-6.84

0.024

3.64

1.65-9.45

0.001

Concurrent P. aeruginosa isolation

2.10

1.21-5.68

0.042

2.80

1.81-11.42

0.001

§COPD exacerbation that required hospital management (emergency room visit or admission).

£PPM, Pathogenic microorganisms.

Short-term and long-term clinical outcomes

The short- and long-term clinical outcomes are shown in Table 2. Patients with Aspergillus spp. isolation had significantly higher LOS compared to those patients without Aspergillus spp. isolation (7.5 ± 5.0 days Aspergillus versus 11.8 ± 9.2 days Aspergillus, p = 0.02). No differences were found in the rate of exacerbations within the first month (24% versus 25%; p = 0.54) or during the follow-up (60% versus 54%; p = 0.34).

The overall mortality rate at 12 months was 11.3% (27 patients); 13 (10.8%) in the non-Aspergillus spp. group and three (12.5%) in the Aspergillus spp. group (p = 0.373).

Discussion

This is the first study to date to prospectively determine the prevalence of airway Aspergillus spp. and examine the associated risk factors for isolation, in a cohort of severe COPD patients requiring hospitalization for an AECOPD. We have shown that the prevalence of Aspergillus spp. isolation in this cohort was 16.6% on admission and 14.4% at the end of one-year follow-up. The independent risk factors associated with Aspergillus spp. colonization were an AECOPD in the previous year, and the concurrent isolation of PPMs, most frequently Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Notably, Aspergillus spp. isolation was not associated with more severe exacerbations or worse clinical outcomes after a one-year follow up.

We found 28 Aspergillus spp. isolates using a standard method for mycological investigations in spontaneous sputum samples. The prevalence rate of 14.4% in our COPD cohort after a one-year follow-up was surprisingly high. In fact, Aspergillus spp. was the most frequent microorganisms isolated, together with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Importantly, we found significant differences in the bacterial pathogens isolated in the patients with and without Aspergillus spp. isolation, independent of COPD severity, suggesting an increase in the rate of co-infection in COPD patients who present with Aspergillus spp. isolation.

The prevalence of Aspergillus spp. isolation may have been higher if we had used bronchoscopic techniques and specific culture media. However, in real-life settings, clinicians often only have access to sputum samples. In a recent study, Phasley et al. [18] reported that the isolation of Aspergillus fumigatus in sputum culture was significantly higher using a research approach compared to the standard method for mycological investigations. Previous studies, which have not focused solely on Aspergillus spp., have found different prevalence rates of fungi isolation in respiratory samples from patients with cystic fibrosis, COPD and asthma [1921]. Recently, a large, retrospective study conducted by Guinea et al.[7], analyzed the incidence of Aspergillus fumigatus isolation from lower respiratory tract samples in patients admitted for AECOPD in a tertiary hospital The authors found 239 isolations of Aspergillus spp. (16.3 per 1000 admissions), but only 53 (22%) patients had probable IPA. However, unlike our prospective study, the fungal isolations were detected retrospectively by the microbiology laboratory.

There is no doubt that COPD patients are a population at risk for Aspergillus spp. colonization [12, 14]. In a previous study of critically ill patients, Aspergillus spp. isolation from respiratory secretions was significantly associated with both an underlying diagnosis of COPD and treatment with corticosteroids [13]. These findings have been confirmed by other authors, and have strengthened the relationship between pulmonary infection with Aspergillus spp. and the use of intravenous corticosteroids in COPD patients admitted to the ICU for severe exacerbation [16]. In contrast, a study conducted by Afessa et al.[22] reported no isolation of Aspergillus spp. in the respiratory specimens from 250 COPD patients admitted to the ICU because of acute respiratory failure, although no report on corticosteroid therapy was performed.

The concurrent isolation of other pathogens, especially Pseudomonas aeruginosa was also associated with a higher risk of Aspergillus spp. isolation. Although the role of bacterial infection in COPD exacerbations remains controversial, Pseudomonas aeruginosa is usually isolated in patients with advanced COPD stages [2325]. In addition, the incidence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in sputum samples from patients hospitalized with COPD exacerbations is high, and its isolation could also be a marker of poor prognosis independently of other predictors [26].

Patients with previous severe exacerbations are more likely to receive a higher number of antibiotic therapy courses, and this could be the key factor in promoting further Aspergillus spp. isolation. In fact, in a recent publication, it was found that almost 73% of COPD patients in Spain presenting with a Type I Anthonisen exacerbation received antibiotics [27]. Prospective studies focusing on this specific population are much needed to determine whether Aspergillus spp. isolation is the cause or the consequence of more infectious exacerbations with concurrent isolation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Paradoxically to the data of Bafhadel et al.[28], we found no association between the use of either inhaled (ICS) or oral (OCS) corticosteroids and an increased rate of Aspergillus spp.

Colonization of the distal airways by filamentous fungi, such as Aspergillus spp., can occur during the course of COPD, although the clinical relevance is unclear. To date, it is unknown whether colonization by Aspergillus spp. contributes to the increased frequency and severity of exacerbations, or is a marker of more severe disease. In our study, except for a longer LOS, we found no significant differences in any of the other clinical outcomes when comparing patients with and without Aspergillus spp. isolation. Therefore, antifungal treatment may not be beneficial in these patients. Only five of our patients were treated with antifungals despite the fact that none of the CT scans performed showed radiological signs of pulmonary aspergillosis but only doubtful infiltrates on chest x-ray at admission. Importantly, we followed up patients for one year, and there was no significant difference in ICU-admissions and hospital readmissions between the non-Aspergillus and Aspergillus spp. isolation groups, again suggesting that Aspergillus spp. detection does not worsen clinical outcomes.

Several limitations of our study require attention. Firstly, we only used sputum samples for culture, and it can be argued that the value of these specimens is poor in identifying the etiologic agent of the exacerbation. Obtaining sputum samples is a real-life cost-effective tool, but may have limited value in distinguishing transitional Aspergillus spp. isolation from chronic colonization. However, in a previous bronchoscopic validation study published by our group, we found a high concordance between fungal pathogens in samples retrieved via protected specimen brush and sputum (κ = 0.85, p < 0.002) [29]. Although there are new microbiological techniques for the rapid detection of Aspergillus spp. that provide results in less than 4 hours (compared to 3 or more days using conventional culture) [30], until they become widely available, conventional sputum culture remains a good diagnostic tool for Aspergillus spp. identification. Secondly, this study was performed in patients admitted with a severe AECOPD in Spain, and bacteria and fungi flora may differ in different countries. Thirdly, we did not routinely perform CT scans on admission to all patients with Aspergillus spp. isolation. However, none of the 18 patients who were evaluated by a CT scan showed any radiological signs of invasive or chronic pulmonary aspergillosis. Finally, we did not investigate plasma galactomannan antigen, and are unaware of the value of this pathogenic marker in severe COPD patients with Aspergillus spp. isolation. In a recent study of critically ill patients, bronchoalveolar lavage (BALF) galactomannan had a higher sensitivity in the early diagnosis of IPA but its value still remains unclear since the collection and processing of BALF samples for Aspergillus spp. has not yet been standardized [31]. In another study, the cut-off of value for Platelia galactomannan of 1 ng/ml was the best for diagnosing invasive aspergillosis, with both high sensitivity and specificity [32].

In summary, we found a high prevalence of Aspergillus spp. isolation in a cohort of COPD patients with severe AECOPD requiring hospitalization. Except for a longer LOS, we found no differences in the short-term or long-term outcomes. We detected clinical and microbiological risk factors for Aspergillus isolation. However, the infective role of these isolates seems to be minimal. Our findings may serve to propose future more comprehensive studies, with a biological basis that includes pulmonary and systemic markers of the immune and inflammatory response, in order to determine the role of this fungus in COPD exacerbations.

Ethics approval

Ethics approval was provided by the Research Committee from the Hospital Clinic de Barcelona (CEIC 2008/4325).

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Richa Singh for her outstanding work as a language editor.

Support statement

This study was funded by Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques Agusti Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES CB06/06/0028) an Initiative of The Institute de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) and also sponsored by Pfizer clinical protocol A1501086.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pneumology, Institute of Thorax (ICT), Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona (UB), CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES 06/06/0028), Villarroel 170, 08037 Barcelona, Spain
(2)
Department of Pneumology, University Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(3)
Department of Pneumology, Hospital Cruces, Byzkaia, Spain
(4)
Medical Department Pfizer, Madrid, Spain
(5)
Unit of Infectious Diseases, Hospital 12 de Octubre, University Complutense, Madrid, Spain

References

  1. Anzueto A, Sethi S, Martinez FJ: Exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2007, 4 (7): 554-564. 10.1513/pats.200701-003FM.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Soler-Cataluna JJ, Martinez-Garcia MA, Roman SP, Salcedo E, Navarro M, Ochando R: Severe acute exacerbations and mortality in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax. 2005, 60 (11): 925-931. 10.1136/thx.2005.040527. PMCID:PMC1747235PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Anthonisen NR, Manfreda J, Warren CP, Hershfield ES, Harding GK, Nelson NA: Antibiotic therapy in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ann Intern Med. 1987, 106 (2): 196-204. 10.7326/0003-4819-106-2-196.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Seemungal T, Harper-Owen R, Bhowmik A, Moric I, Sanderson G, Message S, Maccallum P, Meade TW, Jeffries DJ, Johnston SL, Wedzicha JA: Respiratory viruses, symptoms, and inflammatory markers in acute exacerbations and stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001, 164 (9): 1618-1623. 10.1164/ajrccm.164.9.2105011.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Rosell A, Monso E, Soler N, Torres F, Angrill J, Riise G, Zalacain R, Morera J, Torres A: Microbiologic determinants of exacerbation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Arch Intern Med. 2005, 165 (8): 891-897. 10.1001/archinte.165.8.891.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Wedzicha JA, Seemungal TA: COPD exacerbations: defining their cause and prevention. Lancet. 2007, 370 (9589): 786-796. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61382-8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Guinea J, Torres-Narbona M, Gijon P, Munoz P, Pozo F, Pelaez T, de Miguel J, Bouza E: Pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: incidence, risk factors, and outcome. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010, 16 (7): 870-877.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Soler N, Huerta A, Torres A: The importance of Aspergillus species infection in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Clin Pulm Med. 2011, 18: 161-168. 10.1097/CPM.0b013e31822182b2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Latge JP: The pathobiology of Aspergillus fumigatus. Trends Microbiol. 2001, 9 (8): 382-389. 10.1016/S0966-842X(01)02104-7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Smith NL, Denning DW: Underlying conditions in chronic pulmonary aspergillosis including simple aspergilloma. Eur Respir J. 2011, 37 (4): 865-872. 10.1183/09031936.00054810.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Bulpa P, Dive A, Sibille Y: Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Eur Respir J. 2007, 30 (4): 782-800. 10.1183/09031936.00062206.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Barberan J, Alcazar B, Malmierca E, Garcia dL, Dorca J, Del CD, Villena V, Hernandez-Febles M, Garcia-Perez FJ, Granizo JJ, Israel DA, Salama N, Arnold CN, Moss SF, Ando T, Wirth HP, Tham KT, Camorlinga M, Blaser MJ, Falkow S, Peek RM: Repeated Aspergillus isolation in respiratory samples from non-immunocompromised patients not selected based on clinical diagnoses: colonisation or infection?. BMC Infect Dis. 2012, 12: 295-10.1186/1471-2334-12-295. PMCID:PMC3519644PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Garnacho-Montero J, Amaya-Villar R, Ortiz-Leyba C, Leon C, Alvarez-Lerma F, Nolla-Salas J, Iruretagoyena JR, Barcenilla F: Isolation of Aspergillus spp. from the respiratory tract in critically ill patients: risk factors, clinical presentation and outcome. Crit Care. 2005, 9 (3): R191-R199. 10.1186/cc3488. PMCID:PMC1175876PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Ader F, Bienvenu AL, Rammaert B, Nseir S: Management of invasive aspergillosis in patients with COPD: rational use of voriconazole. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2009, 4: 279-287. PMCID:PMC2722867PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Rello J, Esandi ME, Mariscal D, Gallego M, Domingo C, Valles J: Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: report of eight cases and review. Clin Infect Dis. 1998, 26 (6): 1473-1475. 10.1086/517672.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Bulpa PA, Dive AM, Garrino MG, Delos MA, Gonzalez MR, Evrard PA, Glupczynski Y, Installe EJ: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with invasive pulmonary aspergillosis: benefits of intensive care?. Intensive Care Med. 2001, 27 (1): 59-67. 10.1007/s001340000768.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Bouza E, Guinea J, Pelaez T, Perez-Molina J, Alcala L, Munoz P: Workload due to Aspergillus fumigatus and significance of the organism in the microbiology laboratory of a general hospital. J Clin Microbiol. 2005, 43 (5): 2075-2079. 10.1128/JCM.43.5.2075-2079.2005. PMCID:PMC1153778PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Pashley CH, Fairs A, Morley JP, Tailor S, Agbetile J, Bafadhel M, Brightling CE, Wardlaw AJ: Routine processing procedures for isolating filamentous fungi from respiratory sputum samples may underestimate fungal prevalence. Med Mycol. 2012, 50 (4): 433-438. 10.3109/13693786.2011.615762. PMCID:PMC3399635PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Borman AM, Palmer MD, Delhaes L, Carrere J, Favennec L, Ranque S, Gangneux JP, Horre R, Bouchara JP: Lack of standardization in the procedures for mycological examination of sputum samples from CF patients: a possible cause for variations in the prevalence of filamentous fungi. Med Mycol. 2010, 48 (Suppl 1): S88-S97.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Knutsen AP, Bush RK, Demain JG, Denning DW, Dixit A, Fairs A, Greenberger PA, Kariuki B, Kita H, Kurup VP, Moss RB, Niven RM, Pashley CH, Slavin RG, Vijay HM, Wardlaw AJ: Fungi and allergic lower respiratory tract diseases. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012, 129 (2): 280-291. 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.12.970.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Agbetile J, Fairs A, Desai D, Hargadon B, Bourne M, Mutalithas K, Edwards R, Morley JP, Monteiro WR, Kulkarni NS, Green RH, Pavord ID, Bradding P, Brightling CE, Wardlaw AJ, Pashley CH: Isolation of filamentous fungi from sputum in asthma is associated with reduced post-bronchodilator FEV1. Clin Exp Allergy. 2012, 42 (5): 782-791. 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2012.03987.x. PMCID:PMC3509218PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Afessa B, Morales IJ, Scanlon PD, Peters SG: Prognostic factors, clinical course, and hospital outcome of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease admitted to an intensive care unit for acute respiratory failure. Crit Care Med. 2002, 30 (7): 1610-1615. 10.1097/00003246-200207000-00035.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Miravitlles M, Espinosa C, Fernandez-Laso E, Martos JA, Maldonado JA, Gallego M: Relationship between bacterial flora in sputum and functional impairment in patients with acute exacerbations of COPD. Study Group of Bacterial Infection in COPD. Chest. 1999, 116 (1): 40-46. 10.1378/chest.116.1.40.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Murphy TF, Brauer AL, Eschberger K, Lobbins P, Grove L, Cai X, Sethi S: Pseudomonas aeruginosa in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008, 177 (8): 853-860. 10.1164/rccm.200709-1413OC.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Garcia-Vidal C, Almagro P, Romani V, Rodriguez-Carballeira M, Cuchi E, Canales L, Blasco D, Heredia JL, Garau J: Pseudomonas aeruginosa in patients hospitalised for COPD exacerbation: a prospective study. Eur Respir J. 2009, 34 (5): 1072-1078. 10.1183/09031936.00003309.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Almagro P, Salvado M, Garcia-Vidal C, Rodriguez-Carballeira M, Cuchi E, Torres J, Heredia JL: Pseudomonas aeruginosa and mortality after hospital admission for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respiration. 2012, 84 (1): 36-43. 10.1159/000331224.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Miravitlles M, Garcia-Polo C, Domenech A, Villegas G, Conget F, de la Roza C: Clinical outcomes and cost analysis of exacerbations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Lung. 2013, 191 (5): 523-530. 10.1007/s00408-013-9487-z.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Bafadhel M, McKenna S, Agbetile J, Fairs A, Desai D, Mistry V, Morley JP, Pancholi M, Pavord ID, Wardlaw AJ, Pashley CH, Brightling CE: Aspergillus fumigatus during stable state and exacerbations of COPD. Eur Respir J. 2014, 43 (1): 64-71. 10.1183/09031936.00162912.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Soler N, Agusti C, Angrill J, Puig DB, Torres A: Bronchoscopic validation of the significance of sputum purulence in severe exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax. 2007, 62 (1): 29-35. 10.1136/thx.2005.056374. PMCID:PMC2111274PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Guinea J, Padilla C, Escribano P, Munoz P, Padilla B, Gijon P, Bouza E: Evaluation of MycAssay Aspergillus for diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in patients without hematological cancer. PLoS One. 2013, 8 (4): e61545-10.1371/journal.pone.0061545. PMCID:PMC3631214PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. He H, Li Q, Chang S, Ding L, Sun B, Li F, Zhan Q: Prognostic value of serum galactomannan index in critically ill patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease at risk of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Chin Med J (Engl). 2014, 127 (1): 23-28.Google Scholar
  32. Guinea J, Jensen J, Pelaez T, Gijon P, Alonso R, Rivera M, Munoz P, Bouza E: Value of a single galactomannan determination (Platelia) for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis in non-hematological patients with clinical isolation of Aspergillus spp. Med Mycol. 2008, 46 (6): 575-579. 10.1080/13693780801978968.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

Advertisement