Skip to main content
Download PDF

Elevated plasma levels of epithelial and endothelial cell markers in COVID-19 survivors with reduced lung diffusing capacity six months after hospital discharge

Respiratory Research volume 23, Article number: 37 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Some COVID-19 survivors present lung function abnormalities during follow-up, particularly reduced carbon monoxide lung diffusing capacity (DLCO). To investigate risk factors and underlying pathophysiology, we compared the clinical characteristics and levels of circulating pulmonary epithelial and endothelial markers in COVID-19 survivors with normal or reduced DLCO 6 months after discharge.

Methods

Prospective, observational study. Clinical characteristics during hospitalization, and spirometry, DLCO and plasma levels of epithelial (surfactant protein (SP) A (SP-A), SP-D, Club cell secretory protein-16 (CC16) and secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor (SLPI)), and endothelial (soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (sICAM-1), soluble E-selectin and Angiopoietin-2) 6 months after hospital discharge were determined in 215 COVID-19 survivors.

Results

DLCO was < 80% ref. in 125 (58%) of patients, who were older, more frequently smokers, had hypertension, suffered more severe COVID-19 during hospitalization and refer persistent dyspnoea 6 months after discharge. Multivariate regression analysis showed that age ≥ 60 years and severity score of the acute episode ≥ 6 were independent risk factors of reduced DLCO 6 months after discharge. Levels of epithelial (SP-A, SP-D and SLPI) and endothelial (sICAM-1 and angiopoietin-2) markers were higher in patients with reduced DLCO, particularly in those with DLCO ≤ 50% ref. Circulating SP-A levels were associated with the occurrence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), organizing pneumonia and pulmonary embolisms during hospitalization.

Conclusions

Reduced DLCO is common in COVID-19 survivors 6 months after hospital discharge, especially in those older than 60 years with very severe acute disease. In these individuals, elevated levels of epithelial and endothelial markers suggest persistent lung damage.

Background

About 20% of patients infected by SARS-CoV-2 require hospitalization for pneumonia (COVID-19) [1]. The epidemiological, pathophysiology and clinical characteristics of these patients during the acute phase of the disease have been extensively described [2], but potential long-term pulmonary sequelae, risk factors and underlying mechanisms in survivors remain still unclear. Previous studies showed that COVID-19 survivors may present lung function abnormalities both at hospital discharge [3] and at 3–6 months follow-up [4,5,6,7,8,9,10], particularly reduced carbon monoxide lung diffusion capacity (DLCO) which is observed in 20 to 80% of them. The clinical severity of COVID-19 [4, 5], radiologic extension [5], development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [4, 5] and pulmonary embolism [4, 8] during the acute episode increases the risk of abnormal DLCO during follow-up, but whether this DLCO impairment is temporary [9] or persistent over time [10] is unclear. Likewise, the mechanisms underlying reduced DLCO after hospital discharge are also unknown albeit they may likely include epithelial and/or endothelial dysfunction [11].

Several circulating biomarkers can reflect pulmonary epithelial and endothelial damage [12]. Surfactant proteins (SP), such as SP-A and SP-D, are pulmonary secreted proteins mainly by the alveolar type II epithelial cells (AEC-II) that leak into the bloodstream when the alveolocapillary barrier is damaged [13]. Other epithelial markers such as Club cell secretory protein-16 (CC16), a secretoglobin mainly produced by Club epithelial cells, and secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor (SLPI), one of the major protease inhibitors at mucosal surfaces, are found at high concentrations in plasma when pulmonary injury occurs [14, 15]. On the other hand, other circulating biomarkers, like soluble sE-selectin, Angiopoietin-2 and intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (sICAM-1), reflect activated or damaged endothelium [16]. In fact, previous reports showed that during the acute phase of COVID-19, sE-selectin, Angiopoietin-2 and sICAM-1 are associated with disease severity [17,18,19]. In survivors of COVID-19, these epithelial markers have not been investigated so far and their potential role in relation to long-term pulmonary sequelae is unknown.

We hypothesize that severe COVID-19 damage epithelial and/or endothelial lung cells and that such damage persists in patients with reduced DLCO after hospital discharge. To test this hypothesis, we compared the clinical characteristics, risk factors and circulating levels of epithelial and endothelial markers 6 months after hospital discharge in survivors of COVID-19 with normal or reduced DLCO.

Methods

Study design, participants and ethics

This prospective, observational study included 215 adults who were hospitalized in our institution between May and November 2020 because of PCR-confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia and studied at 6 months after hospital discharge. Figure 1 presents the consort diagram of the study. STROBE guidelines were used to ensure the reporting of this observational study [20]. The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Board of our hospital (HCB/2020/0422), and all patients signed their informed consent.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study flow-chart

Full size image

Measurements

Demographic, clinical and biological characteristics were recorded on hospital admission and at 6 months after discharge. During admission, patients were treated according to international recommendations [21, 22]. The severity of the acute disease was determined according to the seven-category severity scale recommended by WHO [21]: score 3: admitted to the hospital but not requiring supplemental oxygen; score 4: requiring oxygen by mask or nasal prongs; score 5: requiring non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen; score 6: requiring intubation or mechanical ventilation; and score 7: requiring ventilation plus additional organ support—pressors, renal replacement therapy (RRT), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). ARDS was defined by the Berlin criteria [23]. Organizing pneumonia was defined as the presence of different degrees of bilateral ground glass opacities with peripheral, linear and perilobular consolidations, some of them with reverse halo appearance, associated with bronchial dilatation and architectural distortion [24].

All patients followed the current Spanish Society of Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery (SEPAR) consensus for post-COVID-19 clinical follow-up [25]. In all patients, spirometry and DLCO were measured (Medisoft, Sorinnes, Belgium) 6 months after discharge following international recommendations [26, 27] adapted to the current pandemic situation [28, 29]. Reference values were those of a Mediterranean population [30].

Blood was collected in EDTA tubes by peripheral venepuncture 6 months after discharge and was then centrifuged at 600xg 10 min 4ºC to obtain the plasma which was stored at -80ºC until analysis. Plasma CC16, SP-D (Cloud-Clone Corp, TX, USA), SP-A (Novus Biologicals, CO, USA), SLPI, Angiopoietin-2, sICAM-1 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and sE-selectin (RayBiotech, Peachtree Corners, GA) levels were measured by validated commercially available ELISA kits following manufacturer instructions. Plasma samples were diluted 1/10 for CC16, SP-D, SP-A and Angiopoietin-2, 1/80 for SLPI, 1/25 for sE-selectin and 1/20 for sICAM-1. The limits of detection were 0.156 ng/ml for CC16, 0.625 ng/ml for SP-D, 15.625 pg/ml for SP-A, 62.5 pg/ml for SLPI, 24.7 pg/ml for sE-selectin, 1.6 ng/ml for sICAM-1 and 46.9 pg/ml for Angiopoietin-2.

Statistical analysis

Participants were categorized according their DLCO values at 6 months after discharge as normal (≥ 80% ref.) or low (< 80% ref.); the latter were further subdivided as moderate (80–50% ref.) or severe (< 50% ref.). Results are presented as n, frequency, mean ± standard deviation (SD), median [interquartile range -IQR]. Groups were compared using ANOVA, Student t-test, χ2. Fisher exact test, Kruskal–Wallis or Mann–Whitney tests, as appropriate according to the normal data distribution Multiple comparisons between groups were analyzed by the Dunn’s test. Bivariate correlations were analysed using the Spearman rank test. Multivariable adjusted logistic regression models were used to investigate risk factors of low DLCO (< 80% ref.), with age, hypertension, smoking status (never, current, former) and WHO acute disease severity score as independent variables. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant. Analyses were performed using R version 3.6.1, SPSS version 20 (IBM Inc, Armonk, NY) or GraphPad Prism 7 (GraphPad Software, Inc, La Jolla, Calif).

Results

Cohort characteristics

Mean age was 61.4 ± 11.8 years, and 66% of patients were male. The most frequent comorbid condition prior to hospitalization was arterial hypertension (40%). Most frequent symptoms on admission were fever (73%), cough (59%) and dyspnoea (46%). 44% of patients were admitted to the ICU, and 22% required mechanical ventilation. ARDS was observed in 35% of patients, while organizing pneumonia and pulmonary embolism occurred in 50% and 7% respectively during hospital admission. Length of hospital stay was 21.3 ± 18.6 days.

At 6 months follow-up, 52% of patients remained symptomatic, predominantly with dyspnoea (26%) and fatigue (18%). On average, spirometry was normal (Forced expiratory volume in 1st second (FEV1) 94.7 [83.5–105.8] % ref, Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) 91.9 [81–103] % ref., and FEV1/FVC 79.1 [73.9–83]). Mean DLCO was 76.6 [64.7–91] % ref. Collectively, 136 (63.7%) patients had one or more abnormal lung function value. Specifically, 43 patients (20%) had abnormal FEV1, 47 patients (21.9%) had abnormal FVC and 125 patients (58.1%) had abnormal DLCO values (% ref) (Fig. 2). Among patients with abnormal DLCO, 90 (42%) had a moderate reduction (50–80% ref.) and 35 (16%) a severe one (≤ 50% ref.).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Proportion of patients with abnormal pulmonary values (< 80% ref.). Values of FEV1, FVC or DLCO at 6-months after hospital discharge. For further explanations, see text

Full size image

Comparison of patients with normal vs. reduced DLCO 6 months after hospital discharge

Table 1 shows that patients with reduced DLCO 6 months after hospital discharge were older, more frequently smokers and suffered more arterial hypertension before admission for the acute COVID-19 episode. During hospital admission they had higher levels of C-reactive protein, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and circulating leukocytes, suffered more severe disease and required mechanical ventilation more often. Their length of ICU and hospital stay was longer. Six months after hospital discharge, they showed persistent dyspnoea and cough more often, and their mean levels of LDH and circulating leukocytes remained higher. Interestingly, 35 patients (58%) from score 3 and 4 severity disease had reduced DLCO 6 months after hospital discharge without suffering from respiratory diseases nor smoking.

Table 1 Comparison of COVID-19 patients with normal or abnormal DLCO values 6 months after hospital discharge
Full size table

Table 2 presents the results of univariate and multivariate analyses of risk of abnormal DLCO at 6 months follow-up. Multivariate analysis showed that age ≥ 60 years (OR 2.92 [95CI 1.64–5.21], p < 0.001) and WHO severity score 6 (OR 3.03 [95CI 1.14–8.10], p = 0.02) were independent predictors of reduced DLCO after hospital discharge.

Table 2 Univariate and multivariate analysis for risk of abnormal DLCO at 6-months
Full size table

Epithelial and endothelial biomarkers

Patients with reduced DLCO 6 months after discharge had significantly higher circulating levels of both epithelial (SP-A, SP-D, SLPI) and endothelial (sICAM-1 and Angiopoietin-2) markers, particularly in those with severely reduced DLCO (< 50% ref.) (Fig. 3). Significant associations also existed between DLCO values and these biomarkers (SP-A, rho = − 0.32, p < 0.001; SP-D, rho = − 0.25, p < 0.001; SLPI, rho = -0.15, p = 0.03; sICAM-1, rho = − 0.26, p < 0.001; and Angiopoietin-2, rho = − 0.15, p = 0.03) (see Additional file 1). Once patients that required mechanical ventilation were excluded from the analysis, SP-A (p = 0.004), SP-D (p = 0.002) and sICAM-1 (p = 0.025) still being significantly higher in patients with altered DLCO compared with patients with normal DLCO values. After this exclusion, significant associations still existing between DLCO values and SP-A (rho = − 0.32, p < 0.001), SP-D (rho = − 0.25, p = 0.001) and sICAM-1 (rho = − 0.24, p = 0.002). Also, when patients with comorbidities such as respiratory diseases, hypertension or diabetes were excluded, SP-A, SP-D and sICAM-1 remained significantly higher in this group of patients. When we analyzed the relationship of these markers with blood parameters, we observed weak but significant associations between sICAM-1 levels and LDH (rho = 0.3, p = 0.001) and D-dimer (rho = 0.23, p = 0.03) levels. No differences in CC16 [ng/ml, 24 (14.3–35.4) vs 22.5 (14.8–36.4), p = 0.7] and sE-selectin [ng/ml, 12.7 (6.5–25.6) vs 12.1 (6.99–25.5), p = 0.8] levels were found among patients with normal and reduced DLCO.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Association between epithelial and endothelial markers and the grades of DLCO alteration. a Levels of surfactant proteins (SP) A, SP-D and secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor (SLPI) as epithelial markers and b intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (sICAM-1) and Angiopoietin-2 as endothelial markers significantly increased in patients with the most abnormal DLCO (≤ 50%). Kruskal–Wallis tests are applied, and the adjusted P-values are obtained by Dunn’s test correction

Full size image

Finally, we explored if the levels of these circulating markers during the follow-up were related to the acute COVID-19 event. Figure 4 shows that SP-A levels were higher in patients with more severe acute disease (WHO scores 6 and 7) or in those who had suffered ARDS, organizing pneumonia and pulmonary embolism during hospitalization. Additionally, patients who suffered ARDS had higher levels of SLPI (ng/ml, 160.6 (138.8–204) vs 143.6 (121.5–175.6), p = 0.008) and patients who develop organizing pneumonia had higher levels of SP-D (ng/ml, 160.7 (116.6–200.8) vs 147.3 (102–185), p = 0.048). Of note, endothelial biomarkers levels during follow-up were not related with events during hospitalization.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Association between epithelial markers and clinical severity during hospitalization. Surfactant protein (SP) A levels according to a the severity scale, b acute distress respiratory syndrome (ARDS), c the development of organizing pneumonia and d pulmonary embolism. Kruskal–Wallis test or Mann–Whitney test are applied, as appropriate. The adjusted P-values are obtained by Dunn’s test correction

Full size image

Discussion

This study shows that, 6 months after discharge, reduced DLCO is common in COVID-19 survivors, that age older than 60 years and mechanical ventilation requirement are significant risk factors, and that these patients present elevated systemic levels of several circulating markers of lung epithelial and endothelial damage. Collectively, these observations suggest that epithelial and endothelial lung damage persist in severe COVID-19 patients for at least 6-months after hospital discharge. These results have a direct relationship with DLCO values, although whether these are permanent or reversible changes, and whether this is cause or consequence of COVID-19, require follow-up of these patients.

Previous studies

Our clinical and functional findings here are in keeping with previous studies by our group and others evaluating DLCO after hospital discharge in COVID-19 survivors [3,4,5,6,7,8]. They are also in line with the reduction in DLCO observed in non-COVID-19-related ARDS survivors at 6- and 12-months after hospital discharge [31, 32]. Although recent studies have suggested cardiopulmonary recovery after COVID-19 [9], our findings indicate that a subgroup of patients (≥ 60 years requiring mechanical ventilation and/or additional organ support during admission because of acute COVID-19) still present reduced DLCO 6 months after discharge. The pathophysiological causes for persistent alterations in gas-blood exchange are not fully elucidated yet, but reduced DLCO may suggest interstitial or pulmonary vascular alterations caused by COVID-19 [3]. These structural lung changes may damage diffusion membrane, especially in those patients with severe disease. Their future follow-up will help to elucidate if these alterations are permanent or resolve with time.

Interpretation of novel findings

It has been recently recommended that clinical observational studies on post-COVID-19 conditions investigate biomarkers after, at least, 6 months post-hospital discharge [33]. To our knowledge, this is the first study to do so. We found that the epithelial markers SP-A, SP-D and SLPI are increased in patients with abnormal DLCO 6 months after hospital discharge, reflecting a persistent epithelial injury. SP-A and SP-D are surfactant-related soluble pattern recognition receptors mainly produced by alveolar-epithelial type II cells (AEC-II) and involved in the lung innate immune response against viral and bacterial pathogens [34]. Some previous studies have reported elevated serum SP-D levels during the acute COVID-19 episode and suggested that this may be protective [35,36,37]. Although Club cells can both secrete CC16 and surfactant proteins, CC16 levels were not associated with reduced DLCO in COVID-19 patients. These results may suggest that AEC-II cells are one of the key cells involved in the pathophysiology of reduced DLCO in COVID-19 survivors. Interestingly, SP-A also participates in the protease and antiprotease activity through the regulation of SLPI [38], suggesting that the elevated SLPI levels observed in patients with reduced DLCO may be induced by the high SP-A concentrations.

Regarding the endothelial markers, although sICAM-1 and Angiopoietin-2 are not specific biomarkers for pulmonary vasculature, we found that their levels were increased in patients with abnormal DLCO 6-months after hospital discharge. Both markers are elevated during the acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection in relation to disease severity [17,18,19]. sE-selectin was found to be increased during the acute phase, especially in COVID-19-related ARDS [17], but we did not observe any significant relationship with reduced DLCO at 6-months after hospital discharge. This fact suggests that sE-selectin may have a role only during the initial steps of the pulmonary vasculature damage. Therefore, our findings highlight a persistent endothelial injury in patients with lung sequelae. However, there is a temporal evolution of the endothelial dysfunction markers during the progression of the disease that it should be considered. Viecelli Dalla Sega F. et al.showed that the time course for some endothelial dysfunction markers was different between COVID-19 survivors and non-survivors [39]. Further studies evaluating the levels of these markers during an extended follow-up are needed to know their stability over time.

We also observed, as other works, that patients with mild and moderate COVID-19 can also suffer long-term sequelae [33]. In fact, several of the biomarkers quantified here, including SP-D, SP-A and sICAM-1 still being higher after excluding by mechanical ventilation requirement. Also, these markers still being significantly different when patients with hypertension and/or diabetes are excluded, suggesting that our results are not biased by the comorbidities of the population. In contrast, we observed that SLPI and Angiopoietin-2 did not remain associated with reduced DLCO after mechanical ventilation exclusion, suggesting that they are markers dependent of ventilator-induced lung damage. However, the associations shown in our study may not be causative, and further studies are needed to address this question.

Potential limitations

Our study has several limitations. First, DLCO measurements were not available before COVID-19, so we cannot discard that the patients studied here might have reduced DLCO before suffering COVID-19. However, this is unlikely because the proportion of patients with previously known respiratory diseases in our cohort was very small. Second, data about additional explorations at 6-months were not available for the analysis. Third, we did not include a control group in our study, so we do not know if the levels determined in the patients studied here are normal or not. Yet, it is unclear what type of control individuals should be studied here, healthy ones or survivors of other acute infective episodes. Finally, these biomarkers were not measured during the admission nor at hospital discharge but 6 months later. Future studies will have to validate them as potential prognostic markers of lung sequelae after discharge.

Conclusions

This study shows that reduced DLCO is frequent in COVID-19 patients 6 months after hospital discharge, particularly in those older than 60 years who required mechanical ventilation during admission. We also showed that several circulating epithelial and endothelial pulmonary markers are increased in patients with reduced DLCO. All in all, our results indicate that the pulmonary injury induced by SARS-CoV-2 can leave pulmonary damage six months after hospital discharge. Future studies will have to investigate if this damage is transient or permanent.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AEC-II:

Alveolar type II epithelial cells

ARDS:

Acute respiratory distress syndrome

CC16:

Club cell secretory protein-16

CI 95%:

95% Confidence interval

COPD:

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

CRP:

Protein C reactive

DLCO:

Carbon monoxide lung diffusion capacity

EDTA:

Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid

FEV1 :

Forced expiratory volume in 1st second

FVC:

Forced vital capacity

sICAM-1:

Soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1

ICU:

Intensive care unit

IQR:

Interquartile range

RRT:

Renal replacement therapy

ECMO:

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

LDH:

Lactate dehydrogenase

MV:

Mechanical ventilation

NIV:

Non-invasive mechanical ventilation

OR:

Odds ratio

SD:

Standard deviation

SLPI:

Secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor

SP-A:

Surfactant protein A

SP-D:

Surfactant protein D

References

  1. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395(10223):497–506.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Osuchowski MF, Winkler MS, Skirecki T, Cajander S, Shankar-Hari M, Lachmann G, et al. The COVID-19 puzzle: deciphering pathophysiology and phenotypes of a new disease entity. Lancet Respir Med. 2021;9(6):622–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mo X, Jian W, Su Z, Chen M, Peng H, Peng P, et al. Abnormal pulmonary function in COVID-19 patients at time of hospital discharge. Eur Respir J. 2020;55(6):2001217.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sibila O, Albacar N, Perea L, Faner R, Torralba Y, Hernandez-Gonzalez F, et al. Lung function sequelae in COVID-19 patients 3 months after hospital discharge. Arch Bronconeumol. 2021;57:59–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Qin W, Chen S, Zhang Y, Dong F, Zhang Z, Hu B, et al. Diffusion capacity abnormalities for carbon monoxide in patients with COVID-19 at three-month follow-up. Eur Respir J. 2021;58: 2003677.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. González J, Benítez ID, Carmona P, Santisteve S, Monge A, Moncusí-Moix A, et al. Pulmonary function and radiological features in survivors of critical COVID-19: a 3-month prospective cohort. Chest. 2021;S0012–3692(21):00464–5.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Guler SA, Ebner L, Beigelman C, Bridevaux P-O, Brutsche M, Clarenbach C, et al. Pulmonary function and radiological features four months after COVID-19: first results from the national prospective observational Swiss COVID-19 lung study. Eur Respir J. 2021;57(4):2003690.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Méndez R, Latorre A, González-Jiménez P, Feced L, Bouzas L, Yépez K, et al. Reduced diffusion capacity in COVID-19 survivors. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021;18(7):1253–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sonnweber T, Sahanic S, Pizzini A, Luger A, Schwabl C, Sonnweber B, et al. Cardiopulmonary recovery after COVID-19: an observational prospective multicentre trial. Eur Respir J. 2021;57(4):2003481.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang C, Huang L, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Gu X, et al. 6-month consequences of COVID-19 in patients discharged from hospital: a cohort study. Lancet. 2021;397(10270):220–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hughes JMB, Pride NB. Examination of the carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO) in relation to its KCO and VA components. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186(2):132–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bersten AD, Hunt T, Nicholas TE, Doyle IR. Elevated plasma surfactant protein-B predicts development of acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with acute respiratory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;164:648–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ujma S, Horsnell WGC, Katz AA, Clark HW, Schäfer G. Non-pulmonary immune functions of surfactant proteins A and D. J Innate Immun. 2017;9(1):3–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Almuntashiri S, Zhu Y, Han Y, Wang X, Somanath PR, Zhang D. Club cell secreted protein CC16: potential applications in prognosis and therapy for pulmonary diseases. J Clin Med. 2020;9(12):4039.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kersul AL, Iglesias A, Ríos Á, Noguera A, Forteza A, Serra E, et al. Molecular mechanisms of inflammation during exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Arch Bronconeumol. 2011;47(4):176–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Castro P, Palomo M, Moreno-Castaño AB, Fernández S, Torramadé-Moix S, Pascual G, et al. Is the endothelium the missing link in the pathophysiology and treatment of COVID-19 complications? Cardiovasc Drugs Therapy. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-021-07207-w.

  17. Spadaro S, Fogagnolo A, Campo G, Zucchetti O, Verri M, Ottaviani I, et al. Markers of endothelial and epithelial pulmonary injury in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 ICU patients. Crit Care. 2020;25(1):74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Vassiliou AG, Keskinidou C, Jahaj E, Gallos P, Dimopoulou I, Kotanidou A, et al. ICU admission levels of endothelial biomarkers as predictors of mortality in critically Ill COVID-19 patients. Cells. 2021;10(1):196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Smadja DM, Guerin CL, Chocron R, Yatim N, Boussier J, Gendron N, et al. Angiopoietin-2 as a marker of endothelial activation is a good predictor factor for intensive care unit admission of COVID-19 patients. Angiogenesis. 2020;23(4):611–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370(9596):1453–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. World Health Organization WHO R&D Blueprint novel Coronavirus COVID-19 Therapeutic Trial Synopsis. 2020. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/covid-19-therapeutic-trial-synopsis.

  22. Chalmers JD, Crichton ML, Goeminne PC, Cao B, Humbert M, Shteinberg M, et al. Management of hospitalised adults with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a European respiratory society living guideline. Eur Respir J. 2021;57(4):2100048.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, Fan E, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin definition. JAMA - J Am Med Assoc. 2012;307(23):2526–33.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Parekh M, Donuru A, Balasubramanya R, Kapur S. Review of the chest CT differential diagnosis of ground-glass opacities in the COVID era. Radiology. 2020;297(3):E289-302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sibila O, Molina-Molina M, Valenzuela C, Ríos-Cortés A, Arbillaga-Etxarri A, Torralba García Y, et al. Spanish Society of Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery (SEPAR) consensus for post-COVID-19 clinical follow-up. Open Respir Arch. 2020;2:278–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Graham BL, Steenbruggen I, Barjaktarevic IZ, Cooper BG, Hall GL, Hallstrand TS, et al. Standardization of spirometry 2019 update an official American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society technical statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;200(8):E70-88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Graham BL, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Cooper BG, Jensen R, Kendrick A, et al. 2017 ERS/ATS standards for single-breath carbon monoxide uptake in the lung. Eur Respir J. 2017;49(1):1600016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Torres-Castro R, Solis-Navarro L, Sitjà-Rabert M, Vilaró J. Functional limitations post-COVID-19: a comprehensive assessment strategy. Arch Bronconeumol. 2020;57(Suppl 1):7–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Burgos Rincón F, Martínez Llorens J, Cordovilla PR. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on lung function laboratories: considerations for “today” and the “day after.” Arch Bronconeumol. 2020;56(10):611–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Roca J, Rodriguez-Roisin R, Cobo E, Burgos F, Perez J, Clausen JL. Single-breath carbon monoxide diffusing capacity prediction equations from a Mediterranean population. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990;141(4 I):1026–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Orme J, Romney JS, Hopkins RO, Pope D, Chan KJ, Thomsen G, et al. Pulmonary function and health-related quality of life in survivors of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;167(5):690–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Herridge MS, Cheung AM, Tansey CM, Matte-Martyn A, Diaz-Granados N, Al-Saidi F, et al. One-year outcomes in survivors of the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2009;348(8):683–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Soriano JB, Waterer G, Peñalvo JL, Rello J. Nefer, Sinuhe and clinical research assessing post COVID-19 condition. Eur Respir J. 2021;57(4):2004423.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Tekos F, Skaperda Z, Goutzourelas N, Phelps DS, Floros J, Kouretas D. The importance of redox status in the frame of lifestyle approaches and the genetics of the lung innate immune molecules, SP-A1 and SP-A2, on differential outcomes of covid-19 infection. Antioxidants. 2020;9(9):1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wu YP, Liu ZH, Wei R, Pan SD, Mao NY, Chen B, et al. Elevated plasma surfactant protein d (sp-d) levels and a direct correlation with anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-specific igg antibody in sars patients. Scand J Immunol. 2009;69(6):508–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Leth-Larsen R, Zhong F, Chow VTK, Holmskov U, Lu J. The SARS coronavirus spike glycoprotein is selectively recognized by lung surfactant protein D and activates macrophages. Immunobiology. 2007;212(3):201–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Hsieh M-H, Beirag N, Murugaiah V, Chou Y-C, Kuo W-S, Kao H-F, et al. Human surfactant protein D binds spike protein and acts as an entry inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 pseudotyped viral particles. Front Immunol. 2021;12: 641360.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Ramadas RA, Wu L, LeVine AM. Surfactant protein A enhances production of secretory leukoprotease inhibitor and protects it from cleavage by matrix metalloproteinases. J Immunol. 2009;182(3):1560–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Vieceli Dalla Sega F, Fortini F, Spadaro S, Ronzoni L, Zucchetti O, Manfrini M, et al. Time course of endothelial dysfunction markers and mortality in COVID-19 patients: a pilot study. Clin Transl Med. 2021;11(3): e283.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors thank all participants in the study for the willingness to contribute to medical research, and all field workers for their dedication and quality of their daily work. We are indebted to the HCB-IDIBAPS Biobank for the biological human samples and data procurement and to the Fundació Glòria Soler for its support to the COVIDBANK collection.

Funding

This work has been financed by ad hoc patronage funds for research on COVID-19, from donations from citizens and organizations to the Hospital Clinic de Barcelona-Fundació Clinic per a la recerca Biomedica, “bizum solidario” by Fundación BBVA and research grants from Menarini, Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica (SEPAR) and Agencia de Gestio d´Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca (AGAUR, PANDEMIES 2020). RF is Miguel Servet Fellow. TC is a Sara Borrell Fellow.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Oriol Sibila and Lídia Perea share the first authorship

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pulmonary Service, Respiratory Institute, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, C/Villaroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain

    Oriol Sibila, Núria Albacar, Jorge Moisés, Belen Solarat, Joan Albert Barberà, Joan Ramon Badia, Alvar Agustí & Jacobo Sellarés

  2. Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), C/Roselló 149, 08036, Barcelona, Spain

    Oriol Sibila, Lídia Perea, Núria Albacar, Jorge Moisés, Tamara Cruz, Núria Mendoza, Belen Solarat, Gemma Lledó, Gerard Espinosa, Joan Albert Barberà, Joan Ramon Badia, Alvar Agustí, Jacobo Sellarés & Rosa Faner

  3. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBER), Barcelona, Spain

    Oriol Sibila, Lídia Perea, Núria Albacar, Jorge Moisés, Tamara Cruz, Núria Mendoza, Belen Solarat, Joan Albert Barberà, Joan Ramon Badia, Alvar Agustí, Jacobo Sellarés & Rosa Faner

  4. Autoimmune Diseases Department, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain

    Gemma Lledó & Gerard Espinosa

Authors
  1. Oriol Sibila
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lídia Perea
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Núria Albacar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jorge Moisés
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tamara Cruz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Núria Mendoza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Belen Solarat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Gemma Lledó
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Gerard Espinosa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Joan Albert Barberà
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Joan Ramon Badia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Alvar Agustí
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Jacobo Sellarés
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Rosa Faner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

OS: Study design, obtained study funding, data analysis, data interpretation and statistical analysis including writing of the final manuscript. LP: Study design, sample processing, performance of experimental work, data collection and statistical analysis including writing of the final manuscript. TC, NM: Sample processing, performance of experimental work and data interpretation. NA, BS, JM, GLL, GE, JAB, JRB: Patient recruitment, sample collection, clinical data and data analysis. AA and JS: Study design, data interpretation and writing of the final manuscript. RF: Study design, data analysis, data interpretation and writing of the final manuscript. All authors reviewed, read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oriol Sibila.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Board of our hospital (HCB/2020/0422), and all patients signed their informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Fig. S1

. Additional correlations for DLCO values. Graphs representing the Spearman’s rank correlations between DLCO values and epithelial and endothelial biomarkers measured in COVID-19 survivors at 6-months after hospital discharge

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sibila, O., Perea, L., Albacar, N. et al. Elevated plasma levels of epithelial and endothelial cell markers in COVID-19 survivors with reduced lung diffusing capacity six months after hospital discharge. Respir Res 23, 37 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-022-01955-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-022-01955-5

Keywords

Respiratory Research

ISSN: 1465-993X

Contact us