Skip to main content

Small airway function in Finnish COVID-19 survivors

Abstract

Follow-up studies of COVID-19 patients have found lung function impairment up to six months after initial infection, but small airway function has not previously been studied. Patients (n = 20) hospitalised for a severe SARS-CoV-2 infection underwent spirometry, impulse oscillometry, and multiple measurements of alveolar nitric oxide three to six months after acute infection. None of the patients had small airway obstruction, nor increased nitric oxide concentration in the alveolar level. None of the patients had a reduced FEV1/FVC or significant bronchodilator responses in IOS or spirometry. In conclusion, we found no evidence of inflammation or dysfunction in the small airways.

Introduction

There is some knowledge already emerging on the effects of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) on lung function. Lung function impairment has been described up to six months after acute infection [1, 2]. To date, these studies have indicated that COVID-19 infection affects mostly lung volume and diffusing capacity. In addition, follow-up studies of the previous coronavirus diseases Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) have shown persisting pulmonary impairment, including ventilation restriction and impaired diffusing capacity, as well as lung fibrosis and other radiological abnormalities, persisting in up to 15 years follow-up [3, 4]. To our knowledge, small airway function measurements, such as impulse oscillometry (IOS) or extended exhaled nitric oxide (NO) measurements, have not previously been studied in SARS, MERS, or COVID-19 patients.

Methods

Patients hospitalised due to a documented COVID-19 in the Helsinki metropolitan area, covered by Helsinki University Hospital in Finland, underwent lung function tests three to six months after hospital discharge. The inclusion criteria were (a) the patient had been admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) or (b) the cohort ward clinician had classified the patient’s disease as “severe”. Twenty-seven patients were randomly selected, according to the capacity of the routine clinical physiology lab’s resources, to undergo IOS and multiple flow measurements of exhaled NO in addition to spirometry and diffusing capacity test. Five patients later declined to participate or did not give written consent, and two patients were later excluded for use of inhaled long-acting beta agonist therapy. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Helsinki University Hospital (§148 HUS/1922/2020).

IOS and spirometry manoeuvres were measured in this particular order, and triplicate measurements were recorded in line with ATS/ERS guidelines using Vyntus Pneumo/IOS (Vyaire Medical, Hoechberg, Germany). Participants inhaled 400 μg salbutamol via spacer (Volumatic) immediately after the baseline measurements and performed postbronchodilator measurements 15 min later. Spirometry variables evaluated were forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced expiratory ratio (FEV1/FVC), maximal mid-expiratory flow (MMEF), and maximal flow at 50% of FVC (MEF50). IOS variables evaluated were resistance at 5 Hz (R5), the frequency dependence of resistance in terms of the difference between R5 and resistance at 20 Hz (R5-20), reactance at 5 Hz (X5), and area of reactance (AX).

Multiple flow measurements of exhaled NO (30, 50, 100 and 200 ml/s) were evaluated with a chemiluminescence analyser (CLD 77, EcoPhysics, Duernten, Switzerland) to obtain the fractional concentration of NO with flow 50 ml/s (FENO), and the alveolar NO concentration (NOalv) by using the extended analysis [5].

The lung function results were compared with the healthy reference values of the same gender, age and/or height and expressed as Z-scores [6,7,8,9].

Results

The mean age of participants (14/20 male) was 56 (range 34–72), and the mean BMI was 29.6. Ten patients (50%) had one or more comorbidities, the two most common being hypertension (30%) and type 2 diabetes (25%). One patient had asthma but did not use any inhaled asthma medications. Other pulmonary diseases were not present in the study population. There were no current smokers in the study population, while six participants (30%) reported former smoking, 13 (70%) were never-smokers, and one gave no answer.

The mean duration of hospital treatment was 19 days. Ten (50%) were admitted to ICU and eight (40%) needed mechanical ventilation. The mean duration of intensive care was 17 days and mechanical ventilation 16 days, respectively. Of the 12 participants who were not intubated, 10 (91%) needed supplementary oxygen therapy, with the mean peak flow rate of 10 l/min. Three (15%) had a pulmonary embolism during initial hospitalisation or during the recovery.

IOS, spirometry, and exhaled NO measurements were performed by 20 (100%), 19 (95%), and 18 (90%) participants, respectively. On average, the lung function tests were performed 154 days (5.1 months) after symptom onset. The results are presented in Table 1 and summarised in Fig. 1.

Table 1 Spirometry, impulse oscillometry and exhaled nitric oxide results
Fig. 1
figure1

Flowchart of small airway function at 3–6 months follow-up in 20 adult patients hospitalised due to COVID-19. AX area of reactance, R5-20 differential change in airway resistance between 5 and 20 Hz, FVC forced vital capacity, FEV1/FVC forced expiratory ratio, MEF50 maximal flow at 50% of FVC, MMEF maximal mid-expiratory flow, FEV1 forced expiratory volume in 1 s, FENO fractional concentration of nitric oxide with flow 50 ml/s, NOalv alveolar nitric oxide concentration

There was no evidence of small airway obstruction in IOS in any of the 22 participants, as expressed by the frequency dependence of resistance (R5-20) or the reactance area (AX), which are putative markers of small airway function [10]. One patient had a mildly reduced FEV1 (z = − 1.66, 81% of predicted). The patients had neither a lowered FEV1/FVC, MMEF, MEF50, nor a significant bronchodilator response in spirometry or in IOS (R5 reduction > 40%).

Seven patients (39%) had slightly elevated FENO of 25 to 50 ppb, indicating possible inflammation. None of the participants had an abnormal FENO of more than 50 ppb. In addition, NOalv, indicating the NO production in the small airways, was low or in the normal range in all participants (Table 1).

Discussion

Our study indicates that even among patients with very severe COVID-19 infection, the bronchial inflammation distally in the small airways is not present three to six months after original infection, and there were neither long-term impairments in small airway function, nor new asthma cases. This could imply that COVID-19 does not induce chronic bronchial inflammation or predispose to chronic obstructive diseases.

One should note that our sample size was small due to the clinical physiology lab’s limited resources amidst the pandemic, and our study lacked a control group. However, the assessment of small airway indices was based on previously published reference values matched with the present study sample. Moreover, the participants in our study had recovered from a considerably severe COVID-19, with half of the patients (10/20) admitted to ICU and almost half (8/20) needing mechanical ventilation due to COVID-19. Thus, our results cannot be directly generalised to patients with a milder disease, although the severity of lung function impairment has previously been associated with the severity of the initial infection [1], suggesting that patients with a less severe COVID-19 might have even fewer abnormal findings in small airway function.

In conclusion, small airways do not seem to be affected in COVID-19 survivors at three to six months after the initial infection. Therefore, future follow-up studies should focus on the effects of COVID-19 on diffusing capacity and lung volumes, as evidence suggests that COVID-19 causes damage rather to the lung parenchyma and microcirculation than on the bronchial level.

Availability of data and materials

Data are available upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AX:

Area of reactance

FEV1 :

Forced expiratory volume in 1 s

FENO :

Fractional concentration of nitric oxide with flow 50 ml/s

FEV1/FVC:

Forced expiratory ratio

FVC:

Forced vital capacity

ICU:

Intensive care unit

IOS:

Impulse oscillometry

MEF50 :

Maximal flow at 50% of forced vital capacity

MERS:

Middle East respiratory syndrome

MMEF:

Maximal mid-expiratory flow

NO:

Nitric oxide

NOalv :

Alveolar nitric oxide concentration

R5:

Resistance at 5 Hz

R5-20:

Differential change in airway resistance between 5 and 20 Hz

SARS:

Severe acute respiratory syndrome

X5:

Reactance at 5 Hz

References

  1. 1.

    Sonnweber T, Sahanic S, Pizzini A, et al. Cardiopulmonary recovery after COVID-19—an observational prospective multi-center trial. Eur Respir J. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.03481-2020.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Huang C, Huang L, Wang Y, et al. 6-month consequences of COVID-19 in patients discharged from hospital: a cohort study. The Lancet. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32656-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Das KM, Lee EY, Singh R, et al. Follow-up chest radiographic findings in patients with MERS-CoV after recovery. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2017;27(3):342–9. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijri.IJRI_469_16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Zhang P, Li J, Liu H, et al. Long-term bone and lung consequences associated with hospital-acquired severe acute respiratory syndrome: a 15-year follow-up from a prospective cohort study. Bone Res. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41413-020-0084-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Högman M, Meriläinen P. Extended NO analysis in asthma. J Breath Res. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1752-7155/1/2/024001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Berry M. Alveolar nitric oxide in adults with asthma: evidence of distal lung inflammation in refractory asthma. Eur Respir J. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.05.00132404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Schulz H, Flexeder C, Behr J, et al. Reference values of impulse oscillometric lung Function indices in adults of advanced age. PLoS ONE. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063366.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Quanjer PH, Stanojevic S, Cole TJ, et al. Multi-ethnic reference values for spirometry for the 3–95-yr age range: the global lung function 2012 equations. Eur Respir J. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00080312.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kainu A, Timonen KL, Toikka J, et al. Reference values of spirometry for Finnish adults. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpf.12237.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Goldman MD, Saadeh C, Ross D. Clinical applications of forced oscillation to assess peripheral airway function. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2005.05.026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

None.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JR, MJM, and LPM conceptualised the study. AL collected and analysed the data. AL and MA drafted the article. All authors interpretated the data, revised the article for important intellectual content and approved the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Lindahl.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Helsinki University Hospital (§148 HUS/1922/2020). All participants gave their written informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lindahl, A., Reijula, J., Malmberg, L.P. et al. Small airway function in Finnish COVID-19 survivors. Respir Res 22, 237 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-021-01830-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • Small airways
  • Airway inflammation
  • Viral infection
  • Nitric oxide
  • Impulse oscillometry