Skip to main content

Long-term weight gain in obese COPD patients participating in a disease management program: a risk factor for reduced health-related quality of life



Little is known about how long-term weight gain affects the health perception of COPD patients.


The aim is to evaluate the long-term association of BMI change and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in obese COPD patients.


Claims and survey data from a COPD disease management program were used to match two groups of COPD patients with BMI ≥ 30 who have differing weight trajectories over a 5-year timespan via propensity score and genetic matching. EQ-5D-5L, including visual analog scale (VAS) and COPD Assessment Test (CAT), were used as outcomes of interest. Sociodemographic and disease-based variables were matched.


Out of 1202 obese COPD patients, 126 with a weight increase of four or more BMI points were matched separately with 252 (propensity score matching) and 197 (genetic matching) control subjects who had relatively stable BMI. For the EQ-5D-5L, patients with BMI increase reported significantly worse health perception for VAS and all descriptive dimensions except pain/discomfort. For the CAT, especially the perception of ability to complete daily activities and overall energy results were significantly worse. VAS differences reach the range of minimal important differences. Stopping smoking and already being in obesity class II were the most influential risk factors for BMI increase.


Obese COPD patients who gain four or more BMI points over 5 years report significantly lower results in different dimensions of generic and disease-specific HRQoL than their peers with stable BMI. To improve real-world outcomes, tracking and preventing specific BMI trajectories could constitute a clinically relevant aspect of managing COPD patients.


Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a complex disease that is primarily characterized by airflow limitation but also systemic manifestations that lead to comorbidities [1]. COPD results from inflammation or alterations in repair mechanisms of the lung and can initiate or worsen comorbid diseases [1, 2]. This complicates patient management and affects patient outcomes by lowering health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and increasing mortality [3].

There is evidence that COPD is associated with nutritional and metabolic abnormalities and, in addition, poor nutrition is considered as a risk factor for COPD [4]. Simultaneously, the prevalence of obesity as well as overweight is increasing in developed and developing countries [5]. Furthermore, among over 400 prognostic COPD models for hard clinical outcomes, BMI is the fourth most frequently used predictor following age, FEV1, and sex [6]. In cross-sectional perspective, high BMI is associated with reduced HRQoL in COPD [7, 8]; regarding development over time, evidence is rare and not specific [9], indicating a research gap.

Improving HRQoL is an explicit goal in German disease management guidelines [10]. Factors that predict current HRQoL in COPD include, but are not limited to, previous HRQoL results, physical activity, exacerbations, and specific symptoms [11, 12]. Preventing BMI increase or finding ways to normalize it may therefore represent a key management aspect that is treated insufficiently in several COPD disease guidelines [13, 14] or is covered rather casually [15]. Taken together, BMI gain represents a fundamental aspect of disease management in COPD that has the potential to improve patient health perception, when specific criteria are met. Going beyond a previous study that evaluated the effect of absolute BMI values on health perception in COPD in a cross-sectional setting [8], the aim of this study is to evaluate the association between BMI development and HRQoL in a longitudinal context.



This study uses claims data from AOK Bayern, a statutory health insurance fund, that were linked to survey data. Data were retrieved for all patients who participated in the COPD disease management program (DMP), a structured treatment/surveillance program for COPD patients. More information about the data can be found elsewhere [8]. Overall, the survey was sent to 49,664 DMP patients, 14,753 (29.7%) of whom responded. Observations with missing HRQoL or unrealistic values were removed. As underweight and obesity are very different entities that require different management approaches, especially in COPD, only patients with BMI ≥ 30 were included in this study. Following this filtering, 1202 patients remained for evaluation. The ethics committee of the Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, approved the study (vote no. 17-358). Participants provided written informed consent at the time of inclusion in the DMP.

Disease severity

Disease severity was assessed via the GOLD COPD staging system [16]. GOLD stages are based on the percentage of predicted forced FEV1 and require one post-bronchodilator diagnosis of COPD. The four GOLD severity stages are defined as 1 = mild (> 80% of FEV1 predicted), 2 = moderate (50–79% predicted), 3 = severe (30–49% predicted), and 4 = very severe (< 30% predicted).


BMI is expressed in units of kg/m2. HRQoL quantifies health states as a key indicator of patient-reported outcome, and can be used to improve clinical care [17]. BMI classes I, II, and III are defined as BMI ranging from ≥ 30 to < 35, ≥ 35 to < 40, and ≥ 40 respectively. It is recommended to use both generic as well as disease-specific instruments to evaluate the influence of COPD on HRQoL [18]. The EQ-5D-5L was used to describe and evaluate generic HRQoL [19]. The descriptive part is directed at specific aspects of health and includes the dimensions of mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. In the 5L version of the EQ-5D, respondents are asked to report one out of five problem levels in each dimension ranging from no problems to extreme problems. For overall evaluation, the patient’s response to the visual analog scale (VAS) is taken as part of the EQ-5D-5L, thus reflecting general health perception. As a continuous scale, the VAS ranges from 0 for the worst imaginable health state to 100 for the best. The use of EQ-5D-5L VAS in COPD patients has been validated psychometrically [19]. The COPD Assessment Test (CAT) was used to measure disease-specific HRQoL [20]. The eight dimensions of the CAT refer, among others, to cough, mucus production, sleep, and energy. Each dimension has six answer levels from best (0) to worst (5). Overall, the CAT sum score ranges between 0 for the best health and 40 for the worst.


To evaluate the association of BMI change over time, we used two different matching approaches: propensity score matching (PSM) [21] and genetic matching (GM) [22]. The latter combines PSM and Mahalanobis distance matching and serves to improve the robustness of study results. Standardized mean differences and respective p-values were calculated for all pairwise comparisons. Control subjects—those with a relatively stable BMI—are defined as having a BMI change in the range of ± 1 points from year five prior to the survey (t0) to the year of the survey (t1). Case patients are defined as having a BMI increase of at least four points from t0 to t1. HRQoL values are from t1, whereas BMI trajectory is based on the fifth year before as well as the last year before the survey. The time span of 5 years was selected because it was also incorporated in a comparable evaluation for weight development in COPD, based on the scientifically well-established Copenhagen City Heart Study [23]. Furthermore, this constellation provided the highest number of observations. To improve precision [24] and because of the large number of available control subjects, the matching ratio was set to 2:1 for control (stable BMI) and case (BMI increase of 4 or more points) patients. The terms “stable BMI” and “BMI increase” will refer to each respective group in this paper and will not be used in a different context. The variables education and HRQoL are evaluated from survey data, whereas the variables age (years), sex, smoking status (active, ex, non-smoker during DMP), sleep apnea and, depending on their availability, severe exacerbations that required a hospital visit, and medium exacerbations that required a doctor’s visit, and all single diseases of the Charlson Comorbidity index 5 years prior to the survey [25] are evaluated from claims data. All variables are used to match both groups at t0. The number of quit attempts was not accounted for in the models, but the change in smoking status was controlled for. Physicians documented when patients switched from being active smokers to being ex-smokers in the DMP. To identify risk factors for the two weight trajectories, we calculated a logistic regression model with binary BMI group as dependent outcome. McFadden’s pseudo R-squared was calculated as a performance measure for this logistic regression model. McFadden’s pseudo R-squared values between 0.2 and 0.4 are considered to be a very good fit [26]. Moreover, to improve robustness of the results and to account for events that significantly influence HRQoL in the short term, we also ran a linear regression model that controlled for the number of hospital visits that were coded based on the following ICD-10 chapters [27] in the year before the survey: ‘Chapter I: Certain infectious and parasitic diseases’, ‘Chapter III: Diseases of the blood and blood-forming organs and certain disorders involving the immune mechanism’, ‘Chapter VI: Diseases of the nervous system’, ‘Chapter VII: Diseases of the eye and adnexa’, ‘Chapter XII: Diseases of the skin and subcutaneous tissue’, ‘Chapter XIV: Diseases of the genitourinary system’, ‘Chapter XVIII: Symptoms, signs and abnormal clinical and laboratory findings, not elsewhere classified’, ‘Chapter XIX: Injury, poisoning and certain other consequences of external causes’, and ‘Chapter XXI: Factors influencing health status and contact with health services’.

To compare group means for illustration purposes, we used independent parametric t-tests and examine the required assumptions. We used the Shapiro–Wilk test to control for normality and F-tests to examine homogeneity in variances. All analyses were performed in the software environment R [28].


A total of 1202 patients were available for the evaluation: 1076 had stable BMI and 126 had BMI increase. Following the matching procedure, based on standardized mean difference (SMD), significant differences in matched variables between both groups disappeared (Table 1). However, significant differences between both groups existed for several unmatched variables, including generic and disease-specific HRQoL. VAS and all descriptive dimensions of the EQ-5D-5L except pain/discomfort differed, while half of the CAT dimensions [4,5,6, 8], especially those affecting activity and energy levels, differed significantly as well. There was no significant difference in central indictors of disease severity such as FEV1 predicted or number of severe exacerbations.

Table 1 Sociodemographic and disease-related data of study participants pre- and post-matching

Additional file 1: Figure S1 depicts VAS results for both BMI groups, stratified by GOLD stages, as well as the respective significance levels for the implemented t-tests to compare group means. Mean VAS results were not significantly different between both BMI trajectories in all GOLD stages.

Table 2 depicts results of the logistic regression model with binary BMI trajectory as dependent outcome. McFadden’s R-squared for this model is 0.174. Patients aged 60 years and older had significantly lower odds ratios (ORs) for increasing BMI, and the respective risks decreased by age group. Although class II obesity was associated with an OR of 1.6, ex-smokers had the highest OR with 2.1.

Table 2 Logistic regression results, binary BMI trajectory as dependent outcome

Table 3 depicts the results of the multivariate linear regression model with VAS as dependent outcome. The adjusted R-squared for this model is 0.098. Old age, other education levels, class III obesity, active smoking, sleep apnea, having “symptoms, signs, and abnormal clinical and laboratory findings, not elsewhere classified”, and BMI increase were all associated with significant decline in VAS results. Being male and having “diseases of the blood and blood-forming organs and certain disorders involving the immune mechanism” were associated with higher VAS results.

Table 3 Multivariate linear regression results, VAS as dependent outcome, no matching


Of 1202 obese COPD patients in a DMP, this study found that 10.48% increased their BMI by four or more points over a 5-year period. Using two different matching approaches and implementing a linear regression model to predict VAS results, this BMI increase is shown to be associated with lower generic and disease-specific health perception. Comparing our findings with results from previous literature is difficult as, to our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the association between BMI trajectories and HRQoL in COPD. Although solid literature is available for the association between cross-sectional BMI values and HRQoL [7, 29, 30], literature evaluating the association between BMI change and HRQoL in COPD is rare. An evaluation based on the Copenhagen City Heart Study concludes that weight gain > 3 BMI points in obese COPD patients is associated with increased mortality, but only in patients with severe COPD and not the rest [23]. However, mortality and HRQoL are two different entities that can hardly be compared.

Clinical implications

To be clinically relevant, a change in health perception should reach the threshold of so-called minimum important differences (MIDs). The MID for the EQ-5D-5L VAS was found to be 6.9 (6.5–8.0) points in COPD [19]. In the context of this study, this means that VAS differences between stable BMI and BMI increase patients reach the range of MIDs. On average, COPD patients with stable BMI have 5- to 7-point higher VAS results than their control subjects with BMI increase. This falls into the range of the respective VAS MID in COPD and is therefore most probably clinically relevant. There was no significant difference between GOLD stage, VAS, and the two BMI trajectories (Additional file 1: Fig. S1), indicating that the loss of HRQoL is observable irrespective of COPD severity.

Effective prevention of weight gain in at-risk patients could offer a management option that prevents significant deterioration in HRQoL and should therefore be accounted for. Beyond COPD, it has been found difficult to improve health outcomes once obesity has already been reached or further increased [31]. This underlines the relevance of preventing weight gain, which is linked to worse health outcome. To identify patients who are at risk of BMI increase, we implemented a logistic regression model on the binary outcome “BMI trajectory” (Table 2). We clearly see that obesity grade II and being an ex-smoker are significant risk factors for BMI increase, whereas older age or being a never-smoker decrease the respective risk. Hence, COPD patients who have already gained too much weight and who stop smoking are prone to continue on this trajectory. Detecting these patients in clinical practice is important and can be achieved by monitoring weight change and smoking status over time. This can be done in person, while suitable software could also be used to warn physicians when COPD patients are at risk.

Further weight gain in already obese people has also been observed to reduce generic HRQoL in the general population, as a large Australian study showed for the physical component summary of the SF-36 [32]. Yet, in our study, obese COPD patients with weight gain were not only found to report a decline in generic HRQoL, but also in the lung-specific dimensions measured by the CAT.

Strengths and limitations

The strengths of this study include the novelty of the research question as well as the dataset, which consists of claims as well as survey data. Moreover, this is one of the first studies, if not the first study, to evaluate the association between weight gain and HRQoL in COPD patients over time. As weight gain can be prevented and generic as well as disease-specific HRQoL is negatively associated, this represents an important management aspect of COPD that is currently only partly accounted for in COPD guidelines.

Patients who enrolled in the COPD DMP were observed in two time periods 5 years apart, which results from the study design. On the basis of our study, we cannot assume similar effects for a shorter or longer observation period. Additional research is needed in this regard. Our analysis is also subject to several limitations. Participation in the AOK COPD DMP was voluntary, and therefore self-selection effects are likely. However, as patients with better health consciousness are more likely to participate in a DMP [33], the problems observed in this cohort could be more present as well as more relevant in the non-DMP population. We only modeled the association of two BMI trajectories on the HRQoL of COPD patients and therefore may miss associations for other trajectories. However, we added a sensitivity analysis to the supplement section (Additional file 1: Table S1) to account for a second trajectory (BMI increase ≥ 3) that led to comparable results. Although we controlled for many relevant variables, we cannot fully exclude factors that reduce HRQoL but are independent of BMI change. However, we tried to account for all possible relevant events in the year before the survey.

In absence of t0 results for HRQL we could not include corresponding information in our matching process. Hence the observed results more rather reflect associations than a causal relationship between “weight gain and HRQL decline”. Furthermore a potential reverse causation, meaning that already reduced HRQL might have induced weight gain cannot be fully ruled out. Reverse causation, in which already reduced HRQoL may drive weight gain, could not be controlled for as HRQoL results at t0 are not available and surveys were not provided at this point in time. HRQoL results at t0 would allow us to account for possible differences in VAS results at the beginning of the evaluation period. However, to partly address this issue, we thoroughly matched the populations and accounted for a wide variety of variables at t0 that are associated with HRQoL loss, for example comorbidities, smoking status, COPD severity, and exacerbations, to name a few. T0 results for HRQoL were not available. To reduce the probability of reverse causation, we matched the populations across several relevant variables that influence health perception. Our results point toward an association between weight gain and reduced HRQoL, but causal relationships cannot be proven based on the existing study design.

The BMI itself does not provide information about the body composition of the observed individuals. A higher BMI within the observation period of 5 years could be caused by gaining weight in the form of both fat-free mass and muscle mass [23]. However, it is unlikely that older patients and those in the medium to severe stages of COPD gain lots of fat-free muscle mass. In our observation group, only obese COPD patients with a BMI ≥ 30 are included. Therefore, the results are only representative of already obese patients. However, COPD patients who gain four or more BMI points are at risk of significantly reduced HRQoL. Hence, these findings represent a notable management aspect as physicians can take preventive action to stabilize or reduce the weight of COPD patients during DMP participation.


For obese COPD patients, our study shows that weight gain of four or more BMI points over a 5-year period is significantly associated with lower generic and disease-specific HRQoL. Obesity class II and stopping smoking are risk factors significantly associated with BMI increase.

Preventing BMI increase in obese COPD patients could therefore constitute an important management option to avoid significant deterioration in HRQoL.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available according to the data protection concept approved by the responsible data security officials and the ethics committee.


  1. 1.

    Barnes PJ, Celli BR. Systemic manifestations and comorbidities of COPD. Eur Respir J. 2009;33(5):1165–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Barnes PJ. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of asthma and COPD. Clin Sci (Lond). 2017;131(13):1541–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Halpin DM, Miravitlles M, Metzdorf N, Celli B. Impact and prevention of severe exacerbations of COPD: a review of the evidence. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017;12:2891–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Sun Y, Milne S, Jaw JE, Yang CX, Xu F, Li X, et al. BMI is associated with FEV(1) decline in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a meta-analysis of clinical trials. Respir Res. 2019;20(1):236.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Bhaskaran K, Forbes HJ, Douglas I, Leon DA, Smeeth L. Representativeness and optimal use of body mass index (BMI) in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). BMJ Open. 2013;3(9):e003389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Bellou V, Belbasis L, Konstantinidis AK, Tzoulaki I, Evangelou E. Prognostic models for outcome prediction in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review and critical appraisal. BMJ. 2019;367:l5358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Wacker ME, Jörres RA, Karch A, Wilke S, Heinrich J, Karrasch S, et al. Assessing health-related quality of life in COPD: comparing generic and disease-specific instruments with focus on comorbidities. BMC Pulmon Med. 2016;16(1):70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Huber MB, Kurz C, Kirsch F, Schwarzkopf L, Schramm A, Leidl R. The relationship between body mass index and health-related quality of life in COPD: real-world evidence based on claims and survey data. Respir Res. 2020;21(1):291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Lin YX, Xu WN, Liang LR, Pang BS, Nie XH, Zhang J, et al. The cross-sectional and longitudinal association of the BODE index with quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chin Med J (Engl). 2009;122(24):2939–44.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss. Richtlinie des Gemeinsamen Bundesausschusses zur Zusammenführung der Anforderungen an strukturierte Behandlungsprogramme nach § 137f Absatz 2 SGB V(DMP-Anforderungen-Richtlinie/DMP-A-RL) 2019.

  11. 11.

    Siebeling L, Musoro JZ, Geskus RB, Zoller M, Muggensturm P, Frei A, et al. Prediction of COPD-specific health-related quality of life in primary care COPD patients: a prospective cohort study. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2014;24(1):14060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Esteban C, Arostegui I, Aramburu A, Moraza J, Najera-Zuloaga J, Aburto M, et al. Predictive factors over time of health-related quality of life in COPD patients. Respir Res. 2020;21(1):138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Singh D, Agusti A, Anzueto A, Barnes PJ, Bourbeau J, Celli BR, et al. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive lung disease: the GOLD science committee report 2019. Eur Respir J. 2019;53(5):1900164.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Riley CM, Sciurba FC. Diagnosis and outpatient management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a review. JAMA. 2019;321(8):786–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Team NGU. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: Clinical Guidelines. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in over 16s: diagnosis and management. 2018.

  16. 16.

    Vogelmeier CF, Criner GJ, Martinez FJ, Anzueto A, Barnes PJ, Bourbeau J, et al. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive lung disease 2017 report. GOLD executive summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;195(5):557–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Basch E. Patient-reported outcomes—harnessing patients’ voices to improve clinical care. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(2):105–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Engstrom CP, Persson LO, Larsson S, Sullivan M. Health-related quality of life in COPD: why both disease-specific and generic measures should be used. Eur Respir J. 2001;18(1):69–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Nolan CM, Longworth L, Lord J, Canavan JL, Jones SE, Kon SS, et al. The EQ-5D-5L health status questionnaire in COPD: validity, responsiveness and minimum important difference. Thorax. 2016;71(6):493–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Jones PW, Harding G, Berry P, Wiklund I, Chen W-H, Kline LN. Development and first validation of the COPD Assessment Test. Eur Respir J. 2009;34(3):648–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 1983;70(1):41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Diamond A, Sekhon JS. Genetic matching for estimating causal effects: a general multivariate matching method for achieving balance in observational studies. Rev Econ Stat. 2013;95(3):932–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Prescott E, Almdal T, Mikkelsen KL, Tofteng CL, Vestbo J, Lange P. Prognostic value of weight change in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: results from the Copenhagen City Heart Study. Eur Respir J. 2002;20(3):539–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Austin PC. Statistical criteria for selecting the optimal number of untreated subjects matched to each treated subject when using many-to-one matching on the propensity score. Am J Epidemiol. 2010;172(9):1092–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Sundararajan V, Henderson T, Perry C, Muggivan A, Quan H, Ghali WA. New ICD-10 version of the Charlson comorbidity index predicted in-hospital mortality. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57(12):1288–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    McFadden D. Quantitative methods for analyzing travel behavior of individuals: some recent developments: Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California Berkeley, 1977.

  27. 27.

    World Health Organization. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision 2019 [Available from:].

  28. 28.

    R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria, 2018.

  29. 29.

    Wytrychiewicz K, Pankowski D, Janowski K, Bargiel-Matusiewicz K, Dąbrowski J, Fal AM. Smoking status, body mass index, health-related quality of life, and acceptance of life with illness in stable outpatients with COPD. Front Psychol. 2019;10:1526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Cecere LM, Littman AJ, Slatore CG, Udris EM, Bryson CL, Boyko EJ, et al. Obesity and COPD: associated symptoms, health-related quality of life, and medication use. COPD J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2011;8(4):275–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    LeBlanc EL, Patnode CD, Webber EM, Redmond N, Rushkin M, O’Connor EA. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force evidence syntheses, formerly systematic evidence reviews. Behavioral and pharmacotherapy weight loss interventions to prevent obesity-related morbidity and mortality in adults: an updated systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (U.S.), 2018.

  32. 32.

    Sahle BW, Slewa-Younan S, Melaku YA, Ling L, Renzaho AMN. A bi-directional association between weight change and health-related quality of life: evidence from the 11-year follow-up of 9916 community-dwelling adults. Qual Life Res. 2020;29(6):1697–706.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Kirsch F, Schramm A, Kurz C, Schwarzkopf L, Lutter JI, Huber M, et al. Effect of BMI on health care expenditures stratified by COPD GOLD severity grades: results from the LQ-DMP study. Respir Med. 2020;175:106194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references




The project is funded by the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA), Germany, under the Program Innovation Fund (Support Code 01VSF16025).

Author information




Concept and design: MBH, NS, RL. Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: all authors. Drafting of the manuscript: MBH, NS. Statistical analysis: MBH, NS. Supervision: RL. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nelli Schneider.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The ethics committee of the Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, approved the study (vote no. 17-358). Participants provided written informed consent at the time of inclusion in the disease management program.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Sociodemographic and disease-related data of study participants pre- and post-matching, BMI increased defined as BMI change ≥ 3 points. Figure S1. Boxplots of VAS results post-matching PSM, stratification by GOLD stage, t-test for group means, BMI ≥ 30

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huber, M.B., Schneider, N., Kirsch, F. et al. Long-term weight gain in obese COPD patients participating in a disease management program: a risk factor for reduced health-related quality of life. Respir Res 22, 226 (2021).

Download citation


  • COPD
  • BMI
  • Health-related quality of life
  • Obesity
  • Longitudinal study
  • Real-world evidence