Skip to main content
Download PDF

Smoking-associated increase in mucins 1 and 4 in human airways

Respiratory Research volume 21, Article number: 239 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Rationale

Smoking-related chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with dysregulated production of mucus. Mucins (MUC) are important both for mucus secretion and epithelial defense. We have examined the distribution of MUC1 and MUC4 in the airway epithelial cells of never-smokers and smokers with and without COPD.

Methods

Mucosal biopsies and bronchial wash samples were obtained by bronchoscopy from age- and sex-matched COPD-patients (n = 38; GOLD I-II/A-B), healthy never-smokers (n = 40) and current smokers with normal lung function (n = 40) from the Karolinska COSMIC cohort (NCT02627872). Cell-specific expressions of MUC1, MUC4 and regulating factors, i.e., epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) 1 and 2, were analyzed by immunohistochemistry. Soluble MUC1 was measured by quantitative immunodetection on slot blot.

Results

The levels of cell-bound MUC1 expression in basal cells and in soluble MUC1 in bronchial wash were increased in smokers, regardless of airway obstruction. Patients with chronic bronchitis had higher MUC1 expression. The expression of MUC4 in cells with goblet cell phenotype was increased in smokers. The expression of EGFR2, but not that of EGFR1, was higher in never-smokers than in smokers.

Conclusions

Smoking history and the presence of chronic bronchitis, regardless of airway obstruction, affect both cellular and soluble MUC1 in human airways. Therefore, MUC1 may be a novel marker for smoking- associated airway disease.

Introduction

The mucus layer on the top of the airway epithelium forms the first line of defense against pathogens, toxins and foreign particles [1]. Mucus binds and clears the pathogens through mucociliary clearance. However, abnormal mucus production and clearance can contribute to respiratory diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [2,3,4].

Mucin (MUC) macromolecules are believed to participate in the mucosal defense system by protecting the airway epithelium [5, 6]. Moreover, increased numbers of mucus producing cells i.e. hyperplasia of goblet cells, in the airway epithelium have been shown to associate with increased production of MUC [5]. MUCs are high molecular weight glycosylated proteins and are key components of most gel-like secretions [7]. Airway MUCs are major constituents of the secreted layer that comprise lung mucus in healthy airways and are a part of the mucociliary defense system that protects the lungs [8]. Many mucins, e.g. MUC1, − 2, − 3, − 4, − 5 AC, −5B, − 6, − 7, − 8, − 13, and − 19 have been detected in the lung. Among these, MUC1, MUC4 and MUC16 are transmembrane mucins with a large external polypeptide core protein [9,10,11]. Human MUC1 is expressed in two different forms, as a transmembrane protein complex and as a secreted isoform [12]. Transmembrane MUC1 can also be cleaved from the epithelial surface by sheddases [13]. The initiation of mucin secretion involves a secretory cascade that results in a rapid release of MUCs both from the airway epithelial cells and secretory cells in the submucosal glands. MUC production is regulated by receptors for certain growth factors, e.g. epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and 2 (EGFR2), also known as HER2 or ErB2 [14,15,16].

MUC1 was originally thought to be expressed in most secretory human epithelial cells [17]. In histopathology, MUC1 has been commonly referred to as epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), or episialin, while its secreted form is also known as the Krebs von den Lungen antigen (KL-6) [17]. MUC1 has been shown to affect tumor progression in cancers in many organs e.g. a high expression of MUC1 has also been detected in lung cancer [9, 18]. Furthermore, MUC1 can act as a releasable decoy and limit the number of bacteria that access the epithelial cells [13]. Membrane-bound MUC4 also seems to be expressed in the lung [18]. The level of MUC4 is elevated in lung cancer and it has been speculated to play various diverse roles in tumorigenesis [19]. The β-subunit of MUC4 is able to interact with EGFR2 [20].

We hypothesized that the localization and expression of MUC1 and MUC4 in human airways would differ between smokers with or without COPD, and that a difference would also be evident in the levels of soluble MUC1. To test these hypotheses, we investigated bronchial mucosal biopsies and bronchial secretions from never-smokers, smokers with normal lung functions and patients with COPD from the Karolinska COSMIC cohort. For mechanistic purposes, we also evaluated the expression of EGFR1 and EGFR2.

Material and methods

Study subjects and patients

The investigations were performed on specimens from the Karolinska COSMIC cohort (Clinical & Systems Medicine Investigations of Smoking-related Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) (www.ClinicalTrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT02627872). The cohort has been described in detail previously [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. The demographics of the included subjects are summarized in Table 1. Briefly, we investigated healthy never-smokers (Never-smokers, n = 40), current smokers with normal lung function (Smokers, n = 40), and patients with mild-to-moderate COPD (n = 38) of GOLD stage I – II/A-B (FEV1/FVC < 0.7 and FEV1 50–100% of predicted) including both current smokers and ex-smokers. The groups were matched in terms of age (45–65 years), gender, as well as smoking history (> 10 pack-years) and current smoking habits (smoking (> 10 cigarettes/day past 6 months)) with the relevant groups. The smoking status of the latter was verified by assay of exhaled carbon monoxide [31]. Chronic bronchitis was diagnosed in 19 patients [32].

Table 1 Clinical data of the study subjects
Full size table

Bronchoscopy, biopsy retrieval and bronchial wash samples

Bronchoscopy was performed as previously described [33,34,35]. Biopsy specimens were taken by pulmonary biopsy forceps with smooth-edged jaws (Radial Edge® Biopsy Forceps, Boston Scientific, Boston, MA). Four to six bronchial biopsies were retrieved from each study patient, and they were collected from lobar or segmental carinae of the upper lobes or the apical segment of the lower lobes. All biopsies were immediately formalin-fixed and embedded in paraffin. The tissue samples were stained with haematoxylin-eosin (HE) and a preceding quality evaluation was performed, with the representativeness all biopsies being evaluated. Two representative tissue blocks from each case were selected for immunohistochemical studies for MUC1, MUC4, EGFR1 and EGFR2. Staining was performed in consecutive sections. p63 (for basal cells) and Alcian-Blue periodic acid-Schiff (AB-PAS) (for goblet cells) staining were performed for phenotyping of epithelial cells.

Bronchial wash samples were obtained by instilling 10 mL of sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at 37 °C into a segmental bronchus in the right upper lobe, after which the fluid was gently suctioned back. Samples were frozen without filtration or centrifugation, and stored at − 80 °C until use.

Immunohistochemical staining and quantification of the expression for MUC1, MUC4, EGFR1 and EGFR2

Four μm thick sections were cut from the paraffin embedded tissue blocks, deparaffinized with xylene and rehydrated in a descending ethanol series. The primary antibodies used in the immunostaining were tested for formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissues. The antibodies used are summarized in Table 2. All antibodies were stained with DAKO REAL EnVision-kit from Dako (Dako, Glostrup Denmark). Before application of the primary antibodies for MUC1 and EGFR1, the sections were heated in a microwave oven in 10 mM citrate buffer, pH 6.0, for 10 min. MUC4 and EGFR2 epitopes were retrieved by heating with Tris-EDTA, pH 9.0 for 10 min. After overnight incubation at + 4 °C with the primary antibody (Table 2), a biotinylated secondary HRP Rabbit/mouse -antibody (Dako, Envision) was used. In all the immunostainings the colour was developed with diaminobenzidine (DAB), subsequently the sections were lightly counterstained with haematoxylin. To identify the phenotype of the airway cells, the consecutive sections were also stained with a commercially available antibody against p63 (basal cells, Novocastra, NCL-p63) and a histological Alcian Blue-Periodic acid-Schiff stain (AB-PAS, goblet cells) (Supplemental Fig. 1). Negative control stainings were carried out by substituting non-immune rabbit or mouse primary antibody isotype control (Zymed Laboratories Inc. South San Francisco, CA) and PBS for the primary antibodies.

Table 2 Antibodies used in immunohistochemical stainings
Full size table

In the evaluation of immunohistochemical samples, cytosolic positivity was considered significant; in addition EGFR was also nuclear positive but this was not recorded. The intensity of immunostaining was assessed as 0 (negative), 1 (faintly positive), 2 (positive), 3 (strongly positive) and 4 (very strongly positive), and the extent of the positive staining was estimated from 0 to 100% in each cell type present in the airways i.e. basal cell, goblet cell and respiratory cell (ciliated and non-ciliated). The score for each antibody was calculated by multiplying the total intensity with the extent, resulting in a total score with a range between 0 and 400 [18, 36]. The evaluation was performed blinded to the clinical information of the study subjects by an experienced researcher (HM). Sixty percent of the samples were also evaluated by a pulmonary pathologist (RiK). According to Cohen’s kappa (Ƙ) coefficient, the intra-class correlation between the two assessments was 0.72 and categorised as substantial [37].

Quantification of soluble MUC1

Complete protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma p8340) was added to bronchial wash samples (10 μL to 1 mL of sample) during thawing. Samples were diluted 1/100 in reduction buffer (6 M GuHCl, 5 mM EDTA, 0.1 M Tris/HCl, pH 8.0). An aliquot of 100 μL of each sample was loaded onto a PVDF-FL membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) using a Minifold–II Slot Blot apparatus (Schleicher & Schuell Bioscience, Germany). In addition, nine serial dilutions of the MUC1 standard (recombinant MUC1 produced in cell culture) were also loaded. A vacuum was applied to attach the MUCs to the membrane. The membranes were then dried for 1 h, pre-wetted briefly in 100% methanol, rinsed with ultrapure water and incubated in phosphate buffered saline (PBS, 0.14 M NaCl, 0.0027 M KCl, 0.010 M PO43) for 10 min. Unspecific binding was blocked by incubating in Odyssey blocking buffer (LI-COR Biosciences, NE, USA) for 1 h at 22 °C. Membranes were then incubated with anti-MUC1 monoclonal antibody (BC-2) diluted 1:1000 in Odyssey blocking buffer containing 0.1% Tween 20 overnight at 4 °C with gentle shaking. The membranes were washed four times for 5 min each at 22 °C in PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 (PBS-T). Thereafter, the membranes were incubated with goat anti-mouse IR dye 800 secondary antibody (LI-COR, Biosciences) diluted 1:10000 in blocking buffer containing 0.1% Tween-20 and 0.01% SDS for 30 min in the dark at 22 °C. The membranes were washed (4 × 5 min) in PBS-T, and blots imaged with the Odyssey infrared imaging system (LI-COR, Biosciences) and quantified with ImageJ software.

Statistical methods

Statistical analyses were made with IBM SPSS statistics 24 (IBM, Amonk, NY) and with the R-package (version 3.3.3). The Kruskall-Wallis-test was used to compare the immunohistological expression of individual factors. Pearson’s product moment correlation coefficient was applied to test for associations between factors and lung functions. P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All comparisons between groups were performed with and without stratification by gender, current smoking-status, chronic bronchitis diagnosis, and COPD diagnosis. False Discovery Rate (FDR) method was used for corrections of the multiple testing. FDR less than 0.2 was considered statistically significant (Supplemental Tables 1, 2 and 3).

Results

Immunohistochemical findings in airways

Cell-bound MUC1 expression, as assessed by immunohistochemistry, was primarily localized to the cytosol of the cells of similar location than those of p63 positive cells. This finding suggest that the basal cells were positive for MUC1. There was, an absence of expression in other types of airway epithelial cells (Fig. 1). Both the intensity and the extent of the immunoreactivity varied between samples (Fig. 1). MUC1 was also positive in the sub-epithelial glands. MUC1 expression was more intense in the Smoker than in the Never-smoker group (p = 0.0001) (Fig. 2a), which was also seen following stratification according to gender (males: p = 0.0001 (Fig. 2b); females: p = 0.014 (Fig. 2c). There were no significant differences in the MUC1 expression between Smokers with COPD and those not suffering from COPD. Smokers with COPD exhibited higher levels of MUC1 expression than ex-smokers with COPD (p = 0.027) (Fig. 2a), insignificant difference was detected in males and females (Fig. 2b and c, respectively).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Representative images of the immunohistochemical stainings for cell-bound MUC1 in bronchial biopsy samples. Intensity of the expression was designated as negative, faint, moderate, strong or very strong, and the extent of the positive staining was estimated from 0 to 100% in each cell type present in the airways. Expression of MUC1 in cells suggesting basal cell phenotype in the large airways of a Never-smoker with normal lung functions (a), a Smoker with normal lung function (b), MUC1 expression in basal cells of an ex-smoker with COPD (c) and a Smoker with COPD (d)

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Immunohistochemical scores for cell-bound MUC1 were calculated based on the intensity and extent of the staining. Scores for immunohistochemical expression of MUC1 in basal cells of large airways from smokers (including COPD) and Never-smokers and from ex-smokers with COPD. MUC1 scores in all subjects (a), and scores separately in males (b) and females (c). Results are shown as mean bars with standard error of mean

Full size image

MUC4 was expressed mainly in ciliated cells and basal cells. In 29 of 118 patients, cells suggesting goblet cell phenotype also stained positively for MUC4 (Fig. 3b). MUC4 was also positive in endothelial cells of the blood vessels. The expression level was higher in goblet and basal cell phenotypes in Smokers as compared to Never-smokers (p = 0.009 and p = 0.047, respectively), where the levels below the detection limit in all except one of the Never-Smokers (Fig. 4). In male Smokers, a higher level of MUC4 expression was observed in cells with goblet cell phenotype in comparison to the Never-smokers (p = 0.043) (Fig. 4b). When analyzing the entire cohort, MUC4 expression correlated positively with MUC1 expression in cell with basal cell phenotype (R = 0.34, p = 0.03), with no pronounced gender difference (males: R = 0.36, p = 0.01; females: R = 0.34, p = 0.03). In order to evaluate if there were any morphological differences between MUC1 or MUC4 expressing and non-expressing cells, we re-evaluated 20 biopsies with MUC1 staining and 20 biopsies with MUC4 staining. Half of the re-evaluated samples were scored as low expression (score < 200) while half of them were scored a high expression (score ≥ 200) of MUC1 and MUC4. No morphological differences were observed between samples with high or low expression of the mucins.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Representative images of the immunohistochemical stainings for MUC4 in bronchial biopsy samples. MUC4 was positive mainly in cells suggesting basal cell and ciliated cell phenotypes, in some cases also in cells with goblet cell phenotype. MUC4 expression in ciliated and basal cells in a Never-smoker (a), a positive expression for MUC4 in the main epithelial cell types in a Smoker (b), an ex-smoker with COPD (c) and a smoker with COPD (d)

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Significant results of the scores on the immunohistochemical expression of MUC4 in goblet cells of large airways. MUC4 scores in the goblet cells of all subjects (a) and in males (b). Results are shown as median bars with standard error of median

Full size image

The cytosol of cells suggesting the basal cell phenotype stained positively for EGFR1 (Fig. 5a-d) while other airway epithelial cell types were negative. There were no differences in the expression of EGFR1 between the studied groups (Fig. 5e).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Representative images of the immunohistochemical stainings for EGFR1. Expression of EGFR in cells suggesting basal cell phenotype in the large airways of a Never-smoker with normal lung functions (a), a Smoker with normal lung function (b), MUC1 expression in basal cells of an ex-smoker with COPD (c) and a Smoker with COPD (d). Expression scores of EGFR1 in large airways (e)

Full size image

EGFR2 was detected in the cytosol of both the cells suggesting basal and ciliated cell phenotype of the airway epithelium (Fig. 6a-d). Sub-mucosal glands, if present, were also positive for EGFR2. EGFR2 expression was higher in the Never-smokers as compared to the Smoker group both in the basal phenotype (p = 0.009) and ciliated cell phenotype (p = 0.004) (Fig. 6e-f).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Representative images of the immunohistochemical stainings for EGFR 2. Expression of EGFR2 in cells suggesting basal cell and ciliated cell phenotype in the large airways of a Never-smoker with normal lung functions (a), a Smoker with normal lung function (b), MUC1 expression in basal cells of an ex-smoker with COPD (c) and a Smoker with COPD (d). EGFR2 scores of all subjects in basal cell phenotype (e) and in ciliated cell phenotype (f). Results are shown as median bars and standard error of median

Full size image

Soluble MUC1 in bronchial wash samples in smoking and ex-smoking COPD

The concentration of soluble MUC1 was analysed with immunoblotting of bronchial wash samples. Smokers and Smokers with COPD had a higher concentration of soluble MUC1 in their bronchial wash samples than Never-smokers and ex-smokers with COPD, respectively. A statistically significant difference was detected between Never-smokers and Smokers both in the joint gender analysis (Fig. 7a; p = 0.04), and in females (Fig. 7b; p = 0.02), but not in males although the tendency is similar to females (p = 0.2).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Soluble MUC1 from basal cells or sub-epithelial glands were measured with quantitative immunoblotting. MUC1 concentration in bronchial wash samples. MUC1 concentration in the whole group (a) and in the females (b). 1 unit equals 0.4 μg/mL. Results are shown as mean and standard error of mean

Full size image

Effect of smoking on the expression of MUC1, MUC4, EGFR1 and EGFR2

The expression level of cell-bound MUC1 from bronchial mucosal biopsies (Fig. 8a) was higher in smokers (with and without COPD) than non-smokers (including both never-smoker controls and ex-smoker COPD patients) (p ≤ 0.001). Cell-bound MUC4 expression (Fig. 8b) was higher in smokers as compared to non-smokers in goblet cells (p = 0.03). A higher concentration of soluble MUC1 (Fig. 8c) was found in bronchial wash samples from the large airways of smokers when compared to non-smokers (p = 0.0021). Interestingly, the amount of EGFR2 expression was higher in non-smokers as compared to smokers in basal cells (p = 0.031) and in ciliated cells (p = 0.020).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Cell-bound and soluble MUC1 as well as MUC4 was studied in large airways of non-smokers and smokers. The non-smoker group includes both never-smokers and COPD ex-smokers whereas the smoker group includes smokers with normal lung function and smokers with COPD. a MUC1 scores in cells suggesting basal cell phenotype from immunohistochemical stainings; b MUC4 scores in cells suggesting goblet cell phenotype from immunohistochemical stainings and c. Amount of MUC1 in bronchial wash samples; 1 unit equals 0.4 μg/mL. MUC1 results are shown as mean bars and standard error of mean, MUC4 results are shown as median bars and standard error of median

Full size image

MUC1 expression in patients with Chronic Bronchitis

The expression of cell-bound and the concentration of soluble MUC1 were higher in subjects with chronic bronchitis as compared to non-bronchitic patients (Fig. 9, p ≤ 0.0001 and p = 0.047, respectively). The level of MUC1 expression in large airways was higher in females with chronic bronchitis (p = 0.033) and these women had a higher level of soluble MUC1 (p = 0.021), but these phenomena were not evident in males (p = 0.21). The diagnosis of chronic bronchitis was not associated with MUC4, EGFR1 or EGFR2 expression.

Fig. 9
figure 9

Differences in MUC1 expression levels in patients with or without chronic bronchitis. a Scores of cell-bound MUC1 expression in large airways and b. Amount of MUC1 in bronchial wash samples from the patients; 1 unit equals 0.4 μg/mL. MUC1 results are shown as mean bars and standard error, MUC1 results are shown as median bars and standard error of median

Full size image

MUC1 expression associated with lung function

The level of cell-bound MUC1 expression negatively correlated with post-bronchodilator measures of lung functions when all cases were pooled together. The values of FEV1% of predicted, FEV1/VC and the FEV1/FVC ratios negatively correlated with the level of MUC1 expression (R = -0.24, p = 0.018, R = -0.23, p = 0.027 and R = -0.29, p = 0.004, respectively). A negative correlation was observed also between MUC1 expression and lung functions (FEV1% (R = -0.35, p = 0.015) and FEV1/FVC ratio (R = -0.36, p = 0.013)) in all males pooled together, but not in all females pooled together.

MUC1 expression associated with smoking

The extent of MUC1 expression correlated both with smoking history measured as pack-years (R = 0.48, p ≤ 0.001) and with current cigarette consumption (R = 0.40, p ≤ 0.001). There was a positive correlation observed between pack-years and MUC1 expression in both the male and female groups (R = 0.62, p ≤ 0.001 and R = 0.31, p = 0.04, respectively). Current cigarette consumption was positively correlated with MUC1 expression in the male group (R = 0.53, p ≤ 0.001), but not in the females.

MUC4 expression associated with smoking

Current cigarette consumption was positively correlated with MUC4 expression in cells suggesting goblet cell phenotype (R = 0.23, p = 0.031). This correlation was primarily attributable to the males (R = 0.34, p = 0.02), and not to the females (p = 0.31).

EGFR2 correlated with positive expression of MUC4 in goblet cells

EGFR2 expression in the cells with basal and ciliated cell phenotype negatively correlated with the level of MUC4 expression in the cells suggesting goblet cell phenotype (R = − 0.29, p = 0.01 and R = -0.29, p = 0.01, respectively). This was primarily driven by the females (R = -0.32, p = 0.04 and R = -0.32, p = 0.04), with no significant associations evident in males. EGFR1 levels did not correlate with MUC1 or MUC4. EGFR2 levels did not correlate with MUC1 expression.

EGFR2, but not EGFR1, correlated with smoking and lung functions

EGFR2 expression in the cells with basal cell and ciliated cell phenotype correlated negatively with the number of pack-years smoked (R = -0.26, p = 0.02 and R = − 0.27, p = 0.01, respectively), and with current cigarette consumption (R = -0.24, p = 0.03 and R = -0.24, p = 0.03, respectively) in all Smokers. In the male group, the EGFR2 expression correlated negatively with the current consumption of cigarettes (R = -0.38, p = 0.01, for both cell phenotypes), but not with the parameters reflecting lung functions or with smoking.

A compilation of the cell-specific immunohistochemical results and demographic associations is shown in Table 3.

Table 3 Compilation of the cell-specific immunohistochemical results and demographic associations
Full size table

Discussion

We investigated both cell-specific immunohistochemical expression and the concentration of soluble MUC1 in human airways from age- and gender-matched healthy never-smokers (Never-smoker), current smokers with normal lung function (Smoker) and mild-moderate COPD-patients. We observed that smoking and a diagnosis of chronic bronchitis, but not airway obstruction, were associated both with increased MUC1 expression in cells suggesting basal cell phenotype, as well as the amount of soluble MUC1 protein in the airway lumen. The sources of the soluble MUC1 are likely to be secretions from the sub-epithelial glands, shedding of membrane bound MUC1 from epithelial cells or cells of hematopoietic origin [13, 38, 39]. Previous investigations of MUCs in COPD have focused mostly on MUC5A and MUC5B, whereas there are far fewer investigations of the membrane-bound MUCs such as MUC1 and MUC4. These present results and other studies have shown that the cellular localization of various types of MUCs in airways is variable whereas some MUC types, such as MUC1, seem rather to specifically originate from a certain cell type, namely basal cells.

Caramori et al. investigated MUC5A and 5B in bronchial rings of large airways from patients that had undergone surgery for lung cancer and detected different expressions of MUC5AC and MUC5B in central airways [40]. Kovalenko et al. utilized bronchial biopsies for the assessment of MUC2, MUC3 and MUC4 in large airways during an acute exacerbation of COPD, revealing that the expressions of both MUC2 and MUC3 were reduced [41]. O’Donnell et al. found that the levels of EGFR, ErB3 and MUC5AC but not MUC2 and MUC5B, were increased in bronchial biopsies of smokers as compared to non-smokers and COPD patients (n = 51) [15]. We found that MUC1 was localized in the cells suggesting basal cell phenotype of large airways whereas all the other epithelial cell types were negative. This was both an unexpected and a novel finding since the cell-specific localization of MUC1 protein in the large airways has not been previously published. The basal cell-origin expression for MUC1 was something of a surprise since this cell type is believed to act as a progenitor cell in the airways. The amount of KL-6, a mucinous sialylated sugar chain on the extracellular domain of human MUC1 protein, has been also found to be higher both in serum and in sputum of stable COPD patients [42] as well as during COPD exacerbations [43]. In peripheral lung, KL-6 is predominantly expressed in type II alveolar cells [44] and it has been shown to be highly expressed in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid samples obtained from sarcoidosis patients [45]. Serum levels of KL-6 are known to be elevated in a variety of interstitial lung diseases including idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; these diseases are characterized by alveolar epithelial cell damage [46]. An increased KL-6 level in lung carcinoma patients has been associated with a poor prognosis [47] and downregulation of the MUC1 was claimed to inhibit the non-small cell lung carcinoma progression [48]. In summary, it can be speculated that MUC1 may be a marker of lung progenitor cells both in airways and in alveoli, as MUC1 is predominantly expressed in the two cell types assumed to exhibit the properties of lung stem cells, namely basal cells of airways and type II alveolar cells [49].

Caramori et al. observed that MUC4 was expressed in all cell types present in the airways [50]. Our results partially confirm this finding, i.e. basal and ciliated cells were positive for MUC4, but in contrast, in that publication cells suggesting goblet cell phenotype were negative in most of the cases. Here, immunohistochemical reactivity for MUC4 in goblet cells was evident. The level of MUC4 expression was positively associated with smoking history, but not with lung function. In contrast to the Caramori study, Kovalenko et al. were unable to detect any positivity for MUC4 in the airway cells of COPD patients with GOLD stage III [41]. Similar to MUC1, most of the previous studies on MUC4 have been directed at lung cancer whereas investigations into airway disorders are sparse.

Our results revealed that soluble MUC1 protein levels were higher in the bronchial secretions of Smokers than in Never-smokers. Interestingly, Ishikawa et al. [42] identified higher levels of KL-6 both in sputum and plasma in smokers as compared to non-smokers, these results are in line with our findings of elevated levels of MUC1 in bronchial wash [42].

The level of MUC1 expression correlated with lung function and was increased in individuals with chronic bronchitis, especially in females. Chronic bronchitis has been suggested to be more common among females than males [51].

Previous studies have revealed that the suppression of MUC1 led to a down-regulation of the expression of EGFR, and moreover, MUC1 regulated the nuclear location and function of EGFR [52]. Exposure to cigarette smoke up-regulated EGFR mRNA expression and induced the activation of EGFR-specific tyrosine phosphorylation, resulting in an up-regulation of MUC5AC mRNA and protein production in an in vitro-model; these effects were inhibited by exposure to selective EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors [15]. Anagnostis et al. demonstrated that EGRF1, 2 and 3 mRNA levels were higher in COPD patients as compared to healthy smokers [53]. The largest immunohistochemical study so far performed showed that the level of EGFR was increased in goblet and ciliated cells in large airways of smokers irrespective of the presence of COPD [15]. Our results are at odds with the previous findings. In our subjects, EGFR2 protein expression was actually decreased in the smokers as compared to the never-smokers and the decrease correlated with smoking habits, whereas EGFR1 expression did not reveal any demographic correlations. Similar to the present work, a recent study investigated both EGFR1 and EGFR2 with immunohistochemistry, showing higher EGFR1 expression in ex-smokers with COPD than in ex-smokers without COPD [54]. It has been reported that HER2, a.k.a. EGFR2 was more frequent in COPD patients in comparison with lung cancer sufferers [55]. One clinical trial examining inhaled EGFR reported negative results since a four-week treatment did not decrease the epithelial levels of MUC2, MUC5A and MUC5B in the bronchial biopsies [56]. A recent study using microarray analysis showed that the numbers of EGF receptors were increased in COPD as compared to smokers without COPD [53]. Interestingly, our results indicated that the level of MUC4 expression in goblet cells correlated with that of EGFR2 while the expression of EGFR1 did not correlate with that of MUC1, which is in line with a previous report where the level of MUC4 expression correlated with that of EGFR2 in lung carcinoma specimens [57].

It has been suggested that the phenotype of the disease differs between genders, and we have previously reported evidence of molecular-level sex differences in the Karolinska COSMIC cohort i.e. in the levels of the proteome [25, 58], eicosanoid [21], metabolome [23] and cytokine concentrations [22]. Based on reports of an involvement of the estrogen receptor in the regulation of MUC1 expression [59], we also performed sex-stratified analyses. We found that smoking increased MUC1 expression in the large airways to a greater extent in men than in women, and this correlated negatively with lung function only in males although the tendency was the same in female group. In female smokers, the concentration of soluble MUC1 in the airway lumen was higher as compared to the healthy never-smoker group. Female subjects with chronic bronchitis had higher levels of MUC1 and MUC4 in comparison with the subjects without chronic bronchitis. Interestingly same tendency was seen in males but the differences did not statistically significant.

There are some limitations to this study. The group sizes in general are relatively small in particular in the COPD group, where the numbers of current smokers are not balanced with ex-smokers. Also, a major limitation is that the study is based only on biopsies from the large airways. In spite of these concerns, the results are significant, and the gender differences are supported by other data blocks from the same cohort [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30].

In conclusion, we detected an association of MUC1 and MUC4 expression with smoking and with chronic bronchitis, but not with airway obstruction. Our results support the hypothesis that mucins are important in development of airway symptoms due to smoking. Further studies to elucidate the contributions of each MUC-type in the pathogenesis of COPD would be beneficial.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed in the current study are not publicly available due to state restrictions. Thus, information may compromise research participant privacy/consent but data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AB-PAS:

Alcian Blue periodic acid-Schiff

BAL:

Bronchoalveolar lavage

COPD:

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

DAB:

Diaminobenzidine

GOLD:

The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease

EGFR:

Epithelial growth factor receptor

EMA:

Epithelial membrane antigen

FEV1:

Forced expiratory volume

FVC:

Forced vital capacity

HE:

Haematoxylin-eosin

KL-6:

Krebs von den Lungen antigen

mRNA:

messenger ribonucleic acid

MUC:

Mucin

PBS:

Phosphate-buffered saline

VC:

Vital capacity

References

  1. Zhou-Suckow Z, Duerr J, Hagner M, Agrawal R, Mall MA. Airway mucus, inflammation and remodeling: emerging links in the pathogenesis of chronic lung diseases. Cell Tissue Res. 2017;367(3):537–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kesimer M, Ford AA, Ceppe A, Radicioni G, Cao R, Davis CW, et al. Airway Mucin Concentration as a Marker of Chronic Bronchitis. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(10):911–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Tian PW, Wen FQ. Clinical significance of airway mucus hypersecretion in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Transl Int Med. 2015;3(3):89–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Wedzicha JA. Airway Mucins in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(10):986–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Corfield AP. Mucins: a biologically relevant glycan barrier in mucosal protection. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015;1850(1):236–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rose MC, Voynow JA. Respiratory tract mucin genes and mucin glycoproteins in health and disease. Physiol Rev. 2006;86(1):245–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ramsey KA, Rushton ZL, Ehre C. Mucin Agarose Gel Electrophoresis: Western Blotting for High-molecular-weight Glycoproteins. J Vis Exp. 2016;(112):54153.

  8. Rose MC, Nickola TJ, Voynow JA. Airway mucus obstruction: mucin glycoproteins, MUC gene regulation and goblet cell hyperplasia. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2001;25(5):533–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bafna S, Kaur S, Batra SK. Membrane-bound mucins: the mechanistic basis for alterations in the growth and survival of cancer cells. Oncogene. 2010;29(20):2893–904.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Hattrup CL, Gendler SJ. Structure and function of the cell surface (tethered) mucins. Annu Rev Physiol. 2008;70:431–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nath S, Mukherjee P. MUC1: a multifaceted oncoprotein with a key role in cancer progression. Trends Mol Med. 2014;20(6):332–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Engelmann K, Kinlough CL, Muller S, Razawi H, Baldus SE, Hughey RP, et al. Transmembrane and secreted MUC1 probes show trafficking-dependent changes in O-glycan core profiles. Glycobiology. 2005;15(11):1111–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Linden SK, Sheng YH, Every AL, Miles KM, Skoog EC, Florin TH, et al. MUC1 limits Helicobacter pylori infection both by steric hindrance and by acting as a releasable decoy. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5(10):e1000617.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lapperre TS, Sont JK, van Schadewijk A, Gosman MM, Postma DS, Bajema IM, et al. Smoking cessation and bronchial epithelial remodelling in COPD: a cross-sectional study. Respir Res. 2007;8:85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. O'Donnell RA, Richter A, Ward J, Angco G, Mehta A, Rousseau K, et al. Expression of ErbB receptors and mucins in the airways of long term current smokers. Thorax. 2004;59(12):1032–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Takeyama K, Jung B, Shim JJ, Burgel PR, Dao-Pick T, Ueki IF, et al. Activation of epidermal growth factor receptors is responsible for mucin synthesis induced by cigarette smoke. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2001;280(1):L165–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Patton S, Gendler SJ, Spicer AP. The epithelial mucin, MUC1, of milk, mammary gland and other tissues. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1995;1241(3):407–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lappi-Blanco E, Makinen JM, Lehtonen S, Karvonen H, Sormunen R, Laitakari K, et al. Mucin-1 correlates with survival, smoking status, and growth patterns in lung adenocarcinoma. Tumour Biol. 2016;37(10):13811–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Albrecht H, Carraway KL 3rd. MUC1 and MUC4: switching the emphasis from large to small. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2011;26(3):261–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Chaturvedi P, Singh AP, Chakraborty S, Chauhan SC, Bafna S, Meza JL, et al. MUC4 mucin interacts with and stabilizes the HER2 oncoprotein in human pancreatic cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2008;68(7):2065–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Balgoma D, Yang M, Sjodin M, Snowden S, Karimi R, Levanen B, et al. Linoleic acid-derived lipid mediators increase in a female-dominated subphenotype of COPD. Eur Respir J. 2016;47(6):1645–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Forsslund H, Yang M, Mikko M, Karimi R, Nyren S, Engvall B, et al. Gender differences in the T-cell profiles of the airways in COPD patients associated with clinical phenotypes. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017;12:35–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Naz S, Kolmert J, Yang M, Reinke SN, Kamleh MA, Snowden S, et al. Metabolomics analysis identifies sex-associated metabotypes of oxidative stress and the autotaxin-lysoPA axis in COPD. Eur Respir J. 2017;49(6):1602322.

  24. Karimi R, Tornling G, Forsslund H, Mikko M, Wheelock A, Nyren S, et al. Lung density on high resolution computer tomography (HRCT) reflects degree of inflammation in smokers. Respir Res. 2014;15:23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Kohler M, Sandberg A, Kjellqvist S, Thomas A, Karimi R, Nyren S, et al. Gender differences in the bronchoalveolar lavage cell proteome of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;131(3):743–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yang M, Kohler M, Heyder T, Forsslund H, Garberg HK, Karimi R, et al. Long-term smoking alters abundance of over half of the proteome in bronchoalveolar lavage cell in smokers with normal spirometry, with effects on molecular pathways associated with COPD. Respir Res. 2018;19(1):40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yang M, Kohler M, Heyder T, Forsslund H, Garberg HK, Karimi R, et al. Proteomic profiling of lung immune cells reveals dysregulation of phagocytotic pathways in female-dominated molecular COPD phenotype. Respir Res. 2018;19(1):39.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Mikko M, Forsslund H, Cui L, Grunewald J, Wheelock AM, Wahlstrom J, et al. Increased intraepithelial (CD103+) CD8+ T cells in the airways of smokers with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Immunobiology. 2013;218(2):225–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Naz S, Bhat M, Stahl S, Forsslund H, Skold CM, Wheelock AM, et al. Dysregulation of the Tryptophan Pathway Evidences Gender Differences in COPD. Metabolites. 2019;9(10):212.

  30. Li CX, Wheelock CE, Skold CM, Wheelock AM. Integration of multi-omics datasets enables molecular classification of COPD. Eur Respir J. 2018;51(5):1701930.

  31. Sandberg A, Skold CM, Grunewald J, Eklund A, Wheelock AM. Assessing recent smoking status by measuring exhaled carbon monoxide levels. PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28864.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. al S-HCHe. Definition and classification of chronic bronchitis for clinical and epidemiological purposes. A report to the Medical Research Council by their Committee on the Aetiology of Chronic Bronchitis. Lancet. 1965;1(7389):775–779.

  33. Forsslund H, Mikko M, Karimi R, Grunewald J, Wheelock AM, Wahlstrom J, et al. Distribution of T-cell subsets in BAL fluid of patients with mild to moderate COPD depends on current smoking status and not airway obstruction. Chest. 2014;145(4):711–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lofdahl JM, Cederlund K, Nathell L, Eklund A, Skold CM. Bronchoalveolar lavage in COPD: fluid recovery correlates with the degree of emphysema. Eur Respir J. 2005;25(2):275–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Karimi R, Tornling G, Grunewald J, Eklund A, Skold CM. Cell recovery in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in smokers is dependent on cumulative smoking history. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e34232.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Lee HJ, Xu X, Choe G, Chung DH, Seo JW, Lee JH, et al. Protein overexpression and gene amplification of epidermal growth factor receptor in nonsmall cell lung carcinomas: Comparison of four commercially available antibodies by immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization study. Lung Cancer. 2010;68(3):375–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Macao B, Johansson DG, Hansson GC, Hard T. Autoproteolysis coupled to protein folding in the SEA domain of the membrane-bound MUC1 mucin. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2006;13(1):71–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. McAuley JL, Linden SK, Png CW, King RM, Pennington HL, Gendler SJ, et al. MUC1 cell surface mucin is a critical element of the mucosal barrier to infection. J Clin Invest. 2007;117(8):2313–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Caramori G, Casolari P, Di Gregorio C, Saetta M, Baraldo S, Boschetto P, et al. MUC5AC expression is increased in bronchial submucosal glands of stable COPD patients. Histopathology. 2009;55(3):321–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kovalenko S, Dorofieiev A. The content of mucin MUC-2, −3 and −4 antigens in the bronchial mucosa membrane of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients during acute exacerbation - initial report. Adv Respir Med. 2017;85(1):3–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ishikawa N, Mazur W, Toljamo T, Vuopala K, Ronty M, Horimasu Y, et al. Ageing and long-term smoking affects KL-6 levels in the lung, induced sputum and plasma. BMC Pulm Med. 2011;11:22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Zheng Z, Qi Y, Xu X, Jiang H, Li Z, Yang Q, et al. Sputum mucin 1 is increased during the acute phase of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation. J Thorac Dis. 2017;9(7):1873–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Ishizaka A, Matsuda T, Albertine KH, Koh H, Tasaka S, Hasegawa N, et al. Elevation of KL-6, a lung epithelial cell marker, in plasma and epithelial lining fluid in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2004;286(6):L1088–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Shigemura M, Nasuhara Y, Konno S, Shimizu C, Matsuno K, Yamguchi E, et al. Effects of molecular structural variants on serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 levels in sarcoidosis. J Transl Med. 2012;10:111.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Nathani N, Perkins GD, Tunnicliffe W, Murphy N, Manji M, Thickett DR. Kerbs von Lungren 6 antigen is a marker of alveolar inflammation but not of infection in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care. 2008;12(1):R12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Tomita M, Ayabe T, Chosa E, Nose N, Nakamura K. Prognostic significance of preoperative serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 level in non-small cell lung cancer. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;64(11):657–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Xu T, Li D, Wang H, Zheng T, Wang G, Xin Y. MUC1 downregulation inhibits non-small cell lung cancer progression in human cell lines. Exp Ther Med. 2017;14(5):4443–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Schilders KA, Eenjes E, van Riet S, Poot AA, Stamatialis D, Truckenmuller R, et al. Regeneration of the lung: Lung stem cells and the development of lung mimicking devices. Respir Res. 2016;17:44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Caramori G, Di Gregorio C, Carlstedt I, Casolari P, Guzzinati I, Adcock IM, et al. Mucin expression in peripheral airways of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Histopathology. 2004;45(5):477–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Aryal S, Diaz-Guzman E, Mannino DM. COPD and gender differences: an update. Transl Res. 2013;162(4):208–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Bitler BG, Goverdhan A, Schroeder JA. MUC1 regulates nuclear localization and function of the epidermal growth factor receptor. J Cell Sci. 2010;123(Pt 10):1716–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Anagnostis A, Neofytou E, Soulitzis N, Kampas D, Drositis I, Dermitzaki D, et al. Molecular profiling of EGFR family in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: correlation with airway obstruction. Eur J Clin Investig. 2013;43(12):1299–306.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. de Boer WI, Hau CM, van Schadewijk A, Stolk J, van Krieken JHJM, Hiemstra PS. Expression of Epidermal Growth Factors and Their Receptors in the Bronchial Epithelium of Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Am J Clin Pathol. 2006;125(2):184–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Suzuki M, Wada H, Yoshino M, Tian L, Shigematsu H, Suzuki H, et al. Molecular characterization of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-related non-small cell lung cancer through aberrant methylation and alterations of EGFR signaling. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(3):878–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Woodruff PG, Wolff M, Hohlfeld JM, Krug N, Dransfield MT, Sutherland ER, et al. Safety and efficacy of an inhaled epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor (BIBW 2948 BS) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;181(5):438–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Karg A, Dinc ZA, Basok O, Ucvet A. MUC4 expression and its relation to ErbB2 expression, apoptosis, proliferation, differentiation, and tumor stage in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Pathol Res Pract. 2006;202(8):577–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Yang M, Kohler M, Heyder T, Forsslund H, Garberg HK, Karimi R, et al. Proteomic profiling of lung immune cells reveals dysregulation of phagocytotic pathways in female-dominated molecular COPD phenotype. Respiratory Research. 2018. In press.

  59. Zaretsky JZ, Barnea I, Aylon Y, Gorivodsky M, Wreschner DH, Keydar I. MUC1 gene overexpressed in breast cancer: structure and transcriptional activity of the MUC1 promoter and role of estrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) in regulation of the MUC1 gene expression. Mol Cancer. 2006;5:57.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Benita Engvall, Margitha Dahl, Helene Blomqvist, Gunnel de Forest and Riitta Vuento for technical assistance.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Foundation of the Finnish Anti-Tuberculosis Association, the Jalmari and Rauha Ahokas Foundation, the Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation, the Research Foundation of the Pulmonary Diseases, King Gustaf V’s and Queen Victoria’s Freemasons’ Foundation, Karolinska Institutet, The Swedish Research Council and through the Regional Agreement on Medical Training and Clinical Research (ALF) between Stockholm County Council and Karolinska Institutet. Dr. Chuan-Xing Li is the recipient of an ERS-EU RESPIRE2 MCF [7214]-2013.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Respiratory Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine Solna and Center for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

    Heta Merikallio, Reza Karimi, Chuan-Xing Li, Åsa M. Wheelock & Magnus C. Sköld

  2. Research Unit of Internal Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland

    Heta Merikallio & Riitta Kaarteenaho

  3. Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland

    Heta Merikallio & Riitta Kaarteenaho

  4. Department of Biomedical Chemistry and Cell Biology, Institute of Biomedicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Sara Lindén & Médea Padra

  5. Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergy, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, Stockholm, Sweden

    Reza Karimi & Magnus C. Sköld

  6. Department of Pathology, Center for Cancer Research and Translational Medicine, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland

    Elisa Lappi-Blanco

Authors
  1. Heta Merikallio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Riitta Kaarteenaho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sara Lindén
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Médea Padra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Reza Karimi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Chuan-Xing Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Elisa Lappi-Blanco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Åsa M. Wheelock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Magnus C. Sköld
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

HM, RiK, ÅMW and CMS were involved in the conception, delineation of hypotheses, and design of the study. RK and CMS collected study subjects. CMS performed the bronchoscopies. MP and SL were responsible for analysis of soluble mucins. HM, RiK and ELB performed the immunohistochemical analyses. CXL and ÅMW helped with data processing and statistical analysis. HM wrote a draft of the paper. All authors contributed to the acquisition of the data and the analysis and interpretation of such information. All authors participated in writing the article and had substantial involvement in its revision prior to submission. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heta Merikallio.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Stockholm Regional Ethics Board (No 2006–959-31/1; 2006-10-27), and all participants gave their informed, written consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Immunohistochemical stainings performed with consecutive tissue. Sections were cut in consecutive order, and stained in carefully selected order. In Images A-B p63 and MUC1 staining from healthy current smoker is presented. Basal cells were detected with a specific antibody, p63, which stains nucleus in basal cells showing a dark brown staining (A). Positive MUC1 staining in the basal cells with the score of 285 (B). Cytosolic positivity of the basal cells was considered significant. Red arrows show the staining in the basal cells. In Images C-D AB-PAS and MUC4 stainings from healthy current smoker is presented. Goblet cells were detected with AB-PAS staining, in which goblet cells are stained in clear blue (C). Positive MUC4 staining in all cell types with scores of 300 (D). All the airway epithelial cells types are MUC4 positive, as well as the endothelial cells in small veins. Cytosolic positivity was considered significant. Thin black arrows in both C and D images show the goblet cells and green arrows point to the small veins. Table S1. Comparison between the groups. Scoring of the immunohistochemical stainings mucins and EGFRs with p-value and FDR value. p ≤ 0.05 and FDR ≤0.2 were considered significant. Table S2. Comparison between the groups. Concentration of the soluble MUC1 in bronchial wash with p-value and FDR value. p ≤ 0.05 and FDR ≤0.2 were considered significant. Table S3. Results of correlations between mucins, EGFRs, lung functions and smoking history. p ≤ 0.05 and FDR ≤0.2 were considered significant.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Merikallio, H., Kaarteenaho, R., Lindén, S. et al. Smoking-associated increase in mucins 1 and 4 in human airways. Respir Res 21, 239 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-020-01498-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-020-01498-7

Keywords

Respiratory Research

ISSN: 1465-993X

Contact us