Skip to main content
Download PDF

Global prevalence of asthma-COPD overlap (ACO) in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Respiratory Research volume 20, Article number: 229 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Asthma-COPD overlap (ACO) is a term that encompasses patients with features of both asthma and COPD. To date, the global prevalence of ACO in the general population remains unknown. The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of ACO in the general population using a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

A systematic search of ISI Web of Knowledge, MEDLINE/PubMed, and Scopus was performed up to May 2019 to identify studies reporting the prevalence of ACO. Reference lists from identified studies and relevant review articles were also searched. Eligibility criteria were studies reporting the prevalence of ACO, performed in general population, and published in English language. Pooled prevalence of ACO with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using random effects Meta-analysis.

Results

A total of 27 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The Cochran Q test and I2 statistics revealed substantial heterogeneity among studies. Based on the random-effects model, the pooled prevalence of ACO was 2.0% (95% CI: 1.4–2.6%) in the general population, 26.5% (95% CI: 19.5–33.6%) among patients with asthma, and 29.6% (95% CI: 19.3–39.9%) among patients with COPD. In addition, for included studies, the global prevalence of asthma-only was 6.2% (95% CI: 5.0–7.4%) and COPD-only was 4.9% (95% CI: 4.3–5.5%).

Conclusion

We estimated the global prevalence of ACO based on population-based studies and found that 2.0% of the general population is affected. However, the prevalence of ACO depends on its diagnostic criteria. Therefore, there is a vital need to better define the ACO diagnostic criteria, management and treatment. It is worth noting that the limitations of the present study include lack of studies in some region of the world and small number of studies included in the subgroup analyses.

Background

Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are major public health problem and represent a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide [1, 2]. Asthma and COPD are the most common chronic respiratory diseases worldwide each with a unique natural history and pathophysiology [1]. Asthma is usually characterized by chronic airway inflammation whereas COPD is characterized by persistent respiratory symptoms and chronic inflammation of the airways [3, 4]. However, patients can sometimes have clinical features of both diseases, and this condition has been termed asthma-COPD overlap (ACO), recommended by joint GINA (Global Initiative for Asthma) and GOLD (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease) guideline. According to this guideline, ACO is characterized by “persistent airflow limitation with several features usually associated with asthma and several features usually associated with COPD”. Furthermore, many studies use the term asthma-COPD overlap syndrome (ACOS), but based on the recent change recommended by the GINA and GOLD in 2017, we will use ‘ACO’ as a term for this condition as it is not considered a single entity but a group of phenotypes [4]. Although asthma and COPD have been well defined, there is currently no consensus on the definition of ACO.

Most previous studies revealed that patients with ACO have more respiratory symptoms, more frequent exacerbations, poor quality of life, higher mortality rate, increased health care utilization, and higher prevalence of comorbidities than those with either asthma or COPD only [5,6,7,8,9].

Numerous population-based studies have been carried out to estimate the prevalence of ACO throughout the world, especially in the USA and Europe [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36]. However, there is a considerable variation among the studies. The prevalence of ACO has varied widely in these studies from 0.3 to 5.0% in the general population, from 3.2 to 51.4% in patients with asthma, and from 12.6 to 55.7% in patients with COPD. Although there are currently a limited number of population-based studies in this context, it has been growing in recent years.

The global prevalence of ACO remains unknown, and no systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based studies has yet been conducted. On the other hand, due to the considerable heterogeneity among the reported prevalence of ACO, and its significant public health impact, the exact prevalence of ACO is critical for strategic plan and health policy. We therefore conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature to examine this parameter. We examined the prevalence both in the general population and among patients with asthma or COPD to understand better the absolute burden of this condition.

Methods

This systematic review adheres to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) checklist [37].

Search strategy

A systematic literature search was performed in ISI Web of Knowledge, MEDLINE/PubMed, and Scopus databases up to 30 May 2019 to identify studies reporting the prevalence of ACO. The search strategy in ISI Web of Knowledge is outlined in detail in Table 1. The other databases were searched with similar terms. Reference lists from identified studies and relevant review articles were also searched for studies eligible for inclusion.

Table 1 Search strategy in database of ISI Web of Knowledge
Full size table

Outcomes

Our primary outcome of interest was prevalence of ACO in the general population. Secondary outcomes included the prevalence of ACO in patients with asthma and patients with COPD, prevalence of asthma-only, and prevalence of COPD-only. Table S1 presents definitions of asthma, COPD, and ACO in included studies.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

The following inclusion criteria were used to select studies: (1) studies reporting the prevalence of ACO, (2) population-based studies, (3) studies published in English language. No time restriction for publication dates was used. The following articles were excluded: (1) studies with no usable data, (2) repeated or overlapping studies, and (3) reviews, meta-analysis, and case reports articles.

Data extraction and quality assessment

Data were abstracted independently by two authors (SM and AAH), and discrepancies were resolved by consensus. The following study characteristics were extracted: first author’s name, year of publication year, country, region, study name, study period, age, sample size, and prevalence of ACO (point or period prevalence). Study quality was assessed independently by two authors (SM and AAH) utilizing the Joanna Briggs Institute’s critical appraisal checklist for studies reporting prevalence data [38]. This tool includes 9 items each of which is rated as either yes, no, not clear, or not applicable [38].

Statistical analysis

All meta-analyses were performed using the Stata version 13.0 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX, USA). The Cochran Q test (P < 0.10 was considered indicative of significant heterogeneity) and the I2 statistic (values of 25, 50, and 75% were considered representing low, medium and high heterogeneity, respectively) were used to assess the heterogeneity between studies [39]. Due to the substantial heterogeneity between studies, pooled prevalence of ACO was calculated using a random-effects model. Potential sources of heterogeneity were explored through meta-regression and subgroup analyses with regard to the study region, year of publication, and study quality. Egger’s test and a visual inspection of funnel plots were used to assess the presence of publication bias [40, 41].

Results

Study selection

A flow diagram of the study selection process is presented in Fig. 1. A total of 787 articles were retrieved from the different sources. After removal of duplicates, 402 records remained. By screening titles and abstracts, we identified 47 articles; after the inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, 27 articles remained.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow diagram showing search strategy

Full size image

Study characteristics

The study characteristics of the included studies are summarized in Table 2. In total, we included 27 studies published since 2011, except for one study that published in 1996: twelve from Europe [10, 12, 13, 16, 17, 20, 23, 25, 28,29,30, 35], nine from the North America (United States and Canada) [11, 15, 18, 21, 26, 27, 32,33,34], three East Asia (China and Korea) [19, 22, 36], three from the Latin America and 6 low- and middle-income countries and Australia [14, 24, 31]. The majority of the included studies were published after 2015. As presented in Table S2, the risk of bias was low in the majority of the criteria in the included studies.

Table 2 Description of the studies included in the meta-analysis
Full size table

Prevalence of ACO in the general population

As seen in Fig. 2, the lowest and highest prevalence of ACO in the general population was reported by Walsh et al. in UK (0.3%) [10] and Bui et al. in Australia (5.0%) [24], respectively. The Cochran Q test and I2 statistics revealed substantial heterogeneity among studies (Q(26) = 88,698.3, P < 0.001; I2 = 100%). Therefore, random effects model was used for statistical analysis. The pooled prevalence of ACO in the general population was 2.0% (95% CI: 1.4–2.6%) (Table 3). Furthermore, the shape of funnel plots did not reveal any evidence of obvious asymmetry (publication bias) (Fig. 3). Egger’s test also did not reveal any evidence of publication bias (P = 0.576).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Forest plot showing prevalence of ACO in the general population. Note. Squares represent study-specific prevalence estimates (size of the square denotes the study-specific statistical weight); Horizontal lines represent 95% confidence intervals (CIs); Diamond represents summary estimate of Prevalence with corresponding 95% CI.

Full size image
Table 3 Summary of meta-analysis results
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

Funnel plot for assessing publication bias in meta-analysis for ACO in general population

Full size image

Prevalence of asthma-only and COPD-only

For included studies, the global prevalence of asthma-only was 6.2% (95% CI: 5.0–7.4%) and COPD-only was 4.9% (95% CI: 4.3–5.5%).

Prevalence of ACO among patients with asthma or COPD

Prevalence of ACO among patients with asthma or COPD were reported in 19 and 22 studies, respectively. These values showed considerable variability in patients with asthma (ranging from 3.2 to 51.4%) and COPD (ranging from 13.0 to 55.7%). When these were pooled, the prevalence of ACO was 26.5% (95% CI: 19.5–33.6%) in patients with asthma and 29.6% (95% CI: 19.3–39.9%) in patients with COPD (see Figs. 4 and 5).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Forest plot showing prevalence of ACO in patients with asthma. Note. Squares represent study-specific prevalence estimates (size of the square denotes the study-specific statistical weight); Horizontal lines represent 95% confidence intervals (CIs); Diamond represents summary estimate of Prevalence with corresponding 95% CI.

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

Forest plot showing prevalence of ACO in patients with COPD. Note. Squares represent study-specific prevalence estimates (size of the square denotes the study-specific statistical weight); Horizontal lines represent 95% confidence intervals (CIs); Diamond represents summary estimate of Prevalence with corresponding 95% CI.

Full size image

Subgroup analysis

Potential sources of heterogeneity were explored through subgroup analyses with regard to the study region, year of publication (before 2015 vs after 2015), and study quality (≤7 vs ≥8). According to our results, prevalence of ACO was not related to study region (P = 0.994), year of publication (P = 0.995), and study quality (P = 0.865) (Table 4).

Table 4 Summary of meta-regression and subgroup analysis for prevalence of ACO in the general population
Full size table

Discussion

ACO is a newly identified condition with apparently high prevalence, and evidently variable features, which is associated with a high burden of disease. Patients with ACO may have worse outcomes than those with either asthma- or COPD-only. Despite its high prevalence, few population-based studies have examined the prevalence of ACO, and as a result, the epidemiology of this condition remains poorly defined. Furthermore, until 2010 only one study has examined the prevalence of ACO in the population-based studies. Here we present a comprehensive overview of the prevalence of ACO in the general population as well as in patients with asthma-only and COPD-only. The overall prevalence of ACO in the general population was 2.0%. Heterogeneity was observed between included studies. This heterogeneity may be explained by differences in the definitions, diagnostic criteria, disease ascertainment methods, geographic region, population characteristics (e.g., age and smoking), study design, and inherent biases associated with observational studies.

Subgroup analysis was performed to assess ACO prevalence in different geographic regions. Most of the studies originated from either North America or Europe, but others came from Latin America, China, Korea, and six low- and middle-income countries. When stratification was performed by geographic region, no differences in ACO prevalence were found. Data were lacking for regions of Africa and Middle East, and Eastern Europe, so we could not examine the prevalence of ACO in these areas. Because data were lacking for regions of Africa and Middle East, and Eastern Europe, ACO estimates in this meta-analysis may overestimate or underestimate the global health burden. Thus, future population-based studies are required to estimate and compare the prevalence of ACO in the different geographic regions. Ideally, we would have investigated whether the year of study contributed significantly to the heterogeneity observed between included studies; however, the considerable overlap of the time periods prevented this analysis. Because of this limitation, we alternatively replace year of study with year of publication and found that ACO prevalence were not changed by year of publication.

Of included studies, only one study reported temporal trend of ACO prevalence, which indicated increasing prevalence in time [26]; however, additional population-based studies are necessary to confirm this finding. This upward trend may be explained by increasing prevalence of both asthma and COPD, and improvement in monitoring of patients. To date, only three studies from Canada, Denmark, and Taiwan examined the incidence of ACO in the general population, emphasizing that such data are missing in the literature. In these studies, the incidence per 1000 person-years was as follows: Canada, 2.1 [26]; Denmark, 0.64 [25]; and Taiwan, 0.70 [42].

The prevalence of ACO among patients with COPD ranged from 12.6 to 55.7% with pooled prevalence of 29.6%. This finding is consistent with a recent meta-analysis, in which the ACO prevalence among patients with COPD in population-based studies was estimated to be 27.0% [8]. In our study, the prevalence of ACO among patients with asthma ranged from 3.2 to 51.4% with pooled prevalence of 26.5%. In previous studies, the prevalence of ACO among patients with asthma also has varied widely from 11.8 to 27.4% [43,44,45,46,47].

For included studies in this review, the global prevalence of asthma-only was 6.2% and COPD-only was 4.9%. In a recent meta-analysis, the global prevalence of COPD based on the GOLD definition was found to be 12.2% [48]. This difference may be due to the different diagnostic criteria and/or including high risk population in the analysis. According to Global Burden of Disease Study 2015, asthma and COPD were the most prevalent chronic respiratory disease, affecting 358 and 174 million people in 2015, respectively. Moreover, COPD and asthma caused 2.6 and 1.1% of global DALYs, respectively [49]. As a large proportion of patients with asthma and COPD have ACO, as well as a worse condition of ACO than asthma- and COPD-only, it is crucial to increase the awareness of ACO and provide clear management and treatment to reduce the disease burden.

This study has several limitations that should be taken into account when interpreting the results. First, there were no data on ACO prevalence for large regions such as Africa and Middle East, and Eastern Europe, thus the generalizability of the results may be limited. Further population-based studies, particularly in Asia and Africa, are required to better estimate the global prevalence and incidence of ACO. Second, regarding the issue that values of ACO prevalence depends on diagnostic methods, we could not perform subgroup analysis for this source of between-study heterogeneity. Third, the quality of the included studies was not optimal. Fourth, the number of studies included in the subgroup analyses was relatively small, so the prevalence of ACO in these subgroups may not be accurately represented. Fifth, although our search was comprehensive, we did not search some other database such as Embase, CINAHL and DOAJ, and include non-English language publications and non-published studies.

Conclusion

This study showed that 2.0% of the general population is affected by ACO. This finding indicates the considerable clinical impact and major burden posed by ACO. Given that there is no consensus on ACO definition in the literature, and the dependence of its prevalence on diagnostic method, it is important to provide clear diagnostic criteria, management and treatment for this condition.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ACO:

Asthma-COPD overlap

ACOS:

Asthma-COPD overlap syndrome

CI:

Confidence Interval

COPD:

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

GINA:

Global Initiative for Asthma

GOLD:

Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease

PRISMA:

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

References

  1. James SL, Abate D, Abate KH, Abay SM, Abbafati C, Abbasi N, Abbastabar H, Abd-Allah F, Abdela J, Abdelalim A. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392(10159):1789–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ehteshami-Afshar S, FitzGerald J, Doyle-Waters M, Sadatsafavi M. The global economic burden of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2016;20(1):11–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vogelmeier CF, Criner GJ, Martinez FJ, Anzueto A, Barnes PJ, Bourbeau J, Celli BR, Chen R, Decramer M, Fabbri LM. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive lung disease. 2017 Report. GOLD executive summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;195(5):557–582.

  4. Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA). Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention, Updated 2017. In: www ginasthma org. 2017.

  5. Andersén H, Lampela P, Nevanlinna A, Säynäjäkangas O, Keistinen T. High hospital burden in overlap syndrome of asthma and COPD. Clin Respir J. 2013;7(4):342–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nielsen M, Bårnes CB, Ulrik CS. Clinical characteristics of the asthma–COPD overlap syndrome–a systematic review. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015;10:1443–54.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Boulet L-P, Hanania NA. The many faces of asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2019;25(1):1–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Alshabanat A, Zafari Z, Albanyan O, Dairi M, FitzGerald J. Asthma and COPD overlap syndrome (ACOS): a systematic review and meta analysis. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0136065.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Wurst KE, Rheault TR, Edwards L, Tal-Singer R, Agusti A, Vestbo J. A comparison of COPD patients with and without ACOS in the ECLIPSE study. Eur Respir J. 2016;47(5):1559–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Walsh L, Wong C, S C, Guhan a, Pringle M, Tattersfield A: The prevalence of diagnosed asthma and COPD in a community population in Nottinghamshire Thorax 1996, 51:A26.

  11. Diaz-Guzman E, Khosravi M, Mannino DM. Asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and mortality in the US population. COPD. 2011;8(6):400–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. De Marco R, Pesce G, Marcon A, Accordini S, Antonicelli L, Bugiani M, Casali L, Ferrari M, Nicolini G, Panico MG. The coexistence of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): prevalence and risk factors in young, middle-aged and elderly people from the general population. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e62985.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Miravitlles M, Soriano JB, Ancochea J, Munoz L, Duran-Tauleria E, Sánchez G, Sobradillo V, García-Río F. Characterisation of the overlap COPD–asthma phenotype. Focus on physical activity and health status. Respir Med. 2013;107(7):1053–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Menezes AMB, de Oca MM, Pérez-Padilla R, Nadeau G, Wehrmeister FC, Lopez-Varela MV, Muiño A, Jardim JRB, Valdivia G, Tálamo C. Increased risk of exacerbation and hospitalization in subjects with an overlap phenotype: COPD-asthma. Chest. 2014;145(2):297–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pleasants RA, Ohar JA, Croft JB, Liu Y, Kraft M, Mannino DM, Donohue JF, Herrick HL. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma–patient characteristics and health impairment. COPD. 2014;11(3):256–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lindström I, Luukkonen R, Vasankari T, Kanervisto M, Heliövaara M, Kainu A, Pallasaho P. Asthma, COPD and the risk of disability pension-11 year register-based follow-up study. Eur Respir J. 2015;46:PA356.

    Google Scholar 

  17. van Boven JF, Román-Rodríguez M, Palmer JF, Toledo-Pons N, Cosío BG, Soriano JB. Comorbidome, pattern, and impact of asthma-COPD overlap syndrome in real life. Chest. 2016;149(4):1011–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kumbhare S, Pleasants R, Ohar JA, Strange C. Characteristics and prevalence of asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap in the United States. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016;13(6):803–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ding B, DiBonaventura M, Karlsson N, Ling X: Asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap syndrome in the urban Chinese population: prevalence and disease burden using the 2010, 2012, and 2013 China National Health and wellness surveys. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2016, 11:1139–1150.

  20. Bonten TN, Kasteleyn MJ, de Mutsert R, Hiemstra PS, Rosendaal FR, Chavannes NH, Slats AM, Taube C. Defining asthma–COPD overlap syndrome: a population-based study. Eur Respir J. 2017;49(5):1602008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mannino DM, Gan WQ, Wurst K, Davis KJ. Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap: the effect of definitions on measures of burden. Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2017;4(2):87–96.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim J, Kim YS, Kim K, Oh Y-M, Yoo KH, Rhee CK, Lee JH. Socioeconomic impact of asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma-COPD overlap syndrome. J Thorac Dis. 2017;9(6):1547.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Ferrante G, Baldissera S, Campostrini S. Epidemiology of chronic respiratory diseases and associated factors in the adult Italian population. Eur J Pub Health. 2017;27(6):1110–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bui DS, Burgess JA, Lowe AJ, Perret JL, Lodge CJ, Bui M, Morrison S, Thompson BR, Thomas PS, Giles GG. Childhood lung function predicts adult chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma–chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;196(1):39–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Baarnes CB, Andersen ZJ, Tjønneland A, Ulrik CS. Incidence and long-term outcome of severe asthma–COPD overlap compared to asthma and COPD alone: a 35-year prospective study of 57,053 middle-aged adults. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017;12:571–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Kendzerska T, Sadatsafavi M, Aaron SD, To TM, Lougheed MD, FitzGerald JM, Gershon AS, Network CRR. Concurrent physician-diagnosed asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a population study of prevalence, incidence and mortality. PLoS One. 2017;12(3):e0173830.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Senthilselvan A, Beach J. Characteristics of asthma and COPD overlap syndrome (ACOS) in the Canadian population. J Asthma. 2018:1–9.

  28. Henriksen AH, Langhammer A, Steinshamn S, Mai X-M, Brumpton BM. The prevalence and symptom profile of asthma–COPD overlap: the HUNT study. COPD. 2018;15(1):27–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ekerljung L, Mincheva R, Hagstad S, Bjerg A, Telg G, Stratelis G, Lötvall J. Prevalence, clinical characteristics and morbidity of the asthma-COPD overlap in a general population sample. J Asthma. 2018;55(5):461–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mindus S, Malinovschi A, Ekerljung L, Forsberg B, Gíslason T, Jõgi R, Franklin KA, Holm M, Johannessen A, Middelveld R. Asthma and COPD overlap (ACO) is related to a high burden of sleep disturbance and respiratory symptoms: results from the RHINE and Swedish GA2LEN surveys. PLoS One. 2018;13(4):e0195055.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Morgan BW, Grigsby MR, Siddharthan T, Chowdhury M, Rubinstein A, Gutierrez L, Irazola V, Miranda JJ, Bernabe-Ortiz A, Alam D. Epidemiology and risk factors of asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap in low-and middle-income countries. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019;143(4):1598–606.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mendy A, Forno E, Niyonsenga T, Carnahan R, Gasana J. Prevalence and features of asthma-COPD overlap in the United States 2007–2012. Clin Respir J. 2018;12(8):2369–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Kumbhare S, Strange C. Mortality in asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap in the United States. South Med J. 2018;111(5):293–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Koleade A, Farrell J, Mugford G, Gao Z. Prevalence and risk factors of ACO (asthma-COPD overlap) in aboriginal people. J Environ Public Health. 2018;2018:4657420.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Guerriero M, Caminati M, Viegi G, Senna G, Pomari C. Prevalence and features of asthma–chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap in northern Italy general population. J Asthma. 2019;56(1):27–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kang H-R, Hong S-H, Ha S-Y, Kim T-B, Lee E-K. Differences in the risk of mood disorders in patients with asthma-COPD overlap and in patients with COPD alone: a nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study in Korea. Respir Res. 2019;20(1):80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Munn Z, Moola S, Lisy K, Riitano D, Tufanaru C. Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13(3):147–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Higgins J, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1539–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994:1088–101.

  41. Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315(7109):629–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Shantakumar S, Pwu R-F, D’Silva L, Wurst K, Kuo Y-W, Yang Y-Y, Juan Y-C, Chan KA. Burden of asthma and COPD overlap (ACO) in Taiwan: a nationwide population-based study. BMC Pulm Med. 2018;18(1):16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Sevimli N, Yapar D, Türktaş H. The prevalence of asthma-COPD overlap (ACO) among patients with asthma. Turk Thorac J. 2019;20(2):97–102.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Kiljander T, Helin T, Venho K, Jaakkola A, Lehtimäki L. Prevalence of asthma–COPD overlap syndrome among primary care asthmatics with a smoking history: a cross-sectional study. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2015;25:15047.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Tommola M, Ilmarinen P, Tuomisto LE, Lehtimäki L, Haanpää J, Niemelä O, Kankaanranta H. Differences between asthma–COPD overlap syndrome and adult-onset asthma. Eur Respir J. 2017;49(5):1602383.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Harada T, Yamasaki A, Fukushima T, Hashimoto K, Takata M, Kodani M, Okazaki R, Takeda K, Watanabe M, Kurai J. Causes of death in patients with asthma and asthma–chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap syndrome. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015;10:595–602.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Watanabe M, Noma H, Kurai J, Sano H, Ueda Y, Mikami M, Yamamoto H, Tokuyasu H, Kato K, Konishi T. Differences in the effects of asian dust on pulmonary function between adult patients with asthma and those with asthma–chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap syndrome. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016;11:183–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Varmaghani M, Dehghani M, Heidari E, Sharifi F, Moghaddam SS, Farzadfar F. Global prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. East Mediterr Health J. 2019;25(1):47–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Soriano JB, Abajobir AA, Abate KH, Abera SF, Agrawal A, Ahmed MB, Aichour AN, Aichour I, Aichour MTE, Alam K. Global, regional, and national deaths, prevalence, disability-adjusted life years, and years lived with disability for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2015. Lancet Respir Med. 2017;5(9):691–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Mostafa Hosseini

  2. Department of Epidemiology, School of Health, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran

    Amir Almasi-Hashiani

  3. Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran

    Mahdi Sepidarkish

  4. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran

    Saman Maroufizadeh

Authors
  1. Mostafa Hosseini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amir Almasi-Hashiani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mahdi Sepidarkish
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Saman Maroufizadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SM: Study concept and design; Collection of data; Analysis and interpretation of the data; Drafting of the article. MH: Study concept and design; Collection of data; Interpretation of the data; Drafting of the article. AAH: Study concept and design; Collection of data; Analysis of the data; Drafting of the article. MS: Conception and design; Interpretation of the data; Drafting of the article. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript for submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saman Maroufizadeh.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Definitions of asthma, COPD, and ACO in included studies. Table S2. Quality assessment of included studies in the meta-analysis using Joanna Briggs Institute’s .Critical appraisal checklist for studies reporting prevalence data.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hosseini, M., Almasi-Hashiani, A., Sepidarkish, M. et al. Global prevalence of asthma-COPD overlap (ACO) in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Respir Res 20, 229 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-019-1198-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-019-1198-4

Keywords

Respiratory Research

ISSN: 1465-993X

Contact us