Skip to content


  • Research
  • Open Access

GDF-15 plasma levels in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are associated with subclinical coronary artery disease

  • 1,
  • 1, 2,
  • 1,
  • 3,
  • 3,
  • 4,
  • 5, 6,
  • 7,
  • 8,
  • 7,
  • 9, 10,
  • 5, 6,
  • 11,
  • 1,
  • 1, 12, 13Email author and
Respiratory Research201718:42

  • Received: 29 November 2016
  • Accepted: 13 February 2017
  • Published:



Growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), a cytokine associated with cardiovascular mortality, increases during chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations, but any role in stable COPD is unknown. We tested associations between GDF-15 and subclinical coronary atherosclerosis, assessed by coronary artery calcium (CAC) score, in COPD subjects free of clinical cardiovascular disease (CVD).


Cross-sectional analysis of COPD participants (GOLD stages 2–4) in the COPDGene cohort without CVD at enrollment, using baseline CAC (from non-EKG-gated chest computed tomography) and plasma GDF-15 (by custom ELISA). We used multinomial logistic modeling of GDF-15 associations with CAC, adjusting for demographics, baseline risk (calculated using the HEART: Personal Heart Early Assessment Risk Tool (Budoff et al. 114:1761-1791, 2006) score), smoking history, measures of airflow obstruction, emphysema and airway disease severity.


Among 694 participants with COPD (47% women, mean age 63.6 years) mean GDF-15 was 1,304 pg/mL, and mean CAC score was 198. Relative to the lower GDF-15 tertile, higher tertiles showed bivariate association with increasing CAC score (mid tertile odds ratio [OR] 1.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29, 2.51; higher tertile OR 2.86, CI 2.04, 4.02). This association was maintained after additionally adjusting for baseline CVD risk, for co-morbidities and descriptors of COPD severity and impact, markers of cardiac stress (N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide, troponin T) and of inflammation (Interleukin-6), and in subgroup analysis excluding men, diabetics, current smokers or those with limited ambulation.


In ever-smokers with COPD free of clinical CVD, GDF-15 contributes independently to subclinical coronary atherosclerosis.

Trial registration, NCT00608764. Registered 28 January 2008.


  • Adult
  • Biomarkers
  • Coronary Artery Disease
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Multivariate Analysis
  • Risk Factors


In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cardiovascular disease (CVD), especially coronary heart disease (CHD), is highly prevalent and impacts mortality and quality of life [1]. COPD is linked to increased risk of overt CVD by substantial epidemiological data, including three large population-based cohorts, two primary care databases, and the nationally representative NHANES survey [15]. Uniquely among leading causes of death, worldwide COPD prevalence continues to increase [6, 7], especially among women [8]. Hence, gains in controlling CHD mortality may stall unless the independent contribution from COPD can be combated.

Shared risk factors only partially explain this association between COPD and CHD [9, 10]. Its molecular basis remains undefined, particularly for subclinical disease, the logical window for prevention. One early CHD marker is subclinical coronary artery calcium (CAC), defined as CAC in those free of clinical CVD. CAC is a validated surrogate measure that predicts future cardiovascular events and mortality [11, 12].

Growth-differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) (gene ID 9518) is a cytokine of the transforming growth factor-β family associated with endothelial and left ventricular dysfunction [13]. Elevated GDF-15 is linked to cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in older adults [14, 15]. We and others recently identified elevated GDF-15 during early COPD exacerbations [1618].

We hypothesized that in COPD, GDF-15 contributes significantly to subclinical CHD presence and severity as determined by CAC, independently of established CVD risks. We tested this hypothesis using participants with COPD in a well-characterized cohort who were without clinical CVD history and >30 days from exacerbation. Because COPD is heterogeneous [19], with co-morbidity clustering with specific phenotypes [20, 21], we also examined associations with imaging-defined phenotypes.


Study design

This cross-sectional analysis used baseline data from the Genetic Epidemiology of COPD Study (COPDGene®) ( # NCT00608764), an ongoing multi-center observational cohort designed to identify genetic factors in smoking-related lung disease [22]. COPDGene recruited ever-smokers (≥10 pack-year), non-Hispanic White or African American adults, both sexes, who underwent a detailed phenotypic evaluation, including high-resolution chest computed tomography (HRCT).

Ethics, consent and permissions

Studies and consent procedures were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Participants understood the study purpose, and provided written informed consent before any procedures. Protocols were approved by Institutional Review Boards at VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System (FWA 00000348) and the University of Michigan (FWA 00004969), approval numbers 2010–120752, HUM000014973, respectively, where we conducted laboratory and statistical analysis, respectively, and at all participating clinical sites.

Study participants

Participants were chosen from a biomarker pilot project (original n = 1000, balanced for sex, age, and equivalent numbers in GOLD stages 2-4), by selecting subjects with available CAC scores and without self-reported CVD. We diagnosed COPD using the fixed-ratio definition [23] (post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in the first second over forced vital capacity [FEV1/FVC] ratio <0.7, plus GOLD grade 2–4 obstruction (FEV1% predicted <80%). Spirometry was performed using an EasyOne™ spirometer and NHANES III predictions [24]. Participants were CHD-free on enrollment, based on negative answers to questions about physician diagnosis (“Have you ever been told by a physician that you have…”) of heart attack, myocardial infarction, coronary artery disease. We also excluded subjects reporting coronary angioplasty or bypass grafting, congestive heart failure, stroke, transient ischemic attacks or peripheral vascular disease.

Data collection


We scored CAC following Agatston’s algorithm [25, 26], from HRCT imaging, un-gated for EKG, and stratified into categories of 0, 1–100, 101–400 and >400 Agatston Units (absence of CAC, mild/minimal, moderate and extensive plaque burden, respectively) [27]. The accuracy and reliability of CAC scoring using un-gated HRCT has been validated in comparisons with EKG-gated studies in COPDGene participants [28].


We measured GDF-15 levels by ELISA according to manufacturer’s instructions from plasma collected at enrollment and stored at -80 °C until analyzed in duplicate; values are presented in pg/mL; the lower limit of detection is 2 pg/mL.


Demographics, smoking and medical history were collected using self-administered questionnaires. Co-morbidities and risk factors were ascertained by combining responses to questions on physician-based diagnosis and review of current medications. We considered hypertension, hyperlipidemia and diabetes present when the participant reported either diagnosis or current medication use for that disease. Physical activity was considered limited based on affirming “Was your walk limited?” during a 6-min walk test. We calculated 10-year CHD risk based on Personal Heart Early Assessment Risk Tool (HEART score) [25], a validated assessment based on self-reported data [29] suitable for use in subjects without previous CHD diagnosis and in the public domain.

We obtained emphysema percentage and airway wall thickness from volumetric HRCTs obtained at full inflation [22], using 3D Slicer software ( and a VIDA Pulmonary Workstation, respectively. Lung areas < -950 Hounsfield Units were considered emphysema, which we stratified as below or ≥10% of lung volume. Airway metrics included the square root of the wall area of a theoretical airway of 10 mm luminal perimeter (Pi10).

Additional plasma analytes

We measured troponin T, N-terminal-proBNP and IL-6 on the same samples using Luminex assays from Milliplex MAP Human Cardiovascular Disease Panels (EMD Millipore, Billerica, Massachusetts). Assays were run in duplicate according to manufacturer's instructions. The lower limits of detection were 9 pg/mL, 18.8 pg/mL and 0.2 pg/mL, respectively.

Statistical analysis

Demographics, smoking history, lung function and cardiovascular risk were analyzed by GDF-15 tertiles, using t-test or chi-square. We tested association between GDF-15 tertiles and CAC burden categories by two strategies. First, we used regression models with CAC as outcome. Second, we developed sequential multinomial logistic regression models including variables grouped in bloc, starting with GDF tertiles, then adjusting for baseline HEART score, then further adjusting for co-morbidities, measures of lung function, and severity of airway disease and emphysema. We selected logistic modeling as our main approach because it presents outcome and exposure as categories, rather than numeric values, improving their interpretability and clinical relevance. We tested interactions of GDF-15 with imaging characteristics and lung function using similar models. Analyses were performed using Prism 6.0f (GraphPad Software, Inc; La Jolla, CA) and Stata v.12 (College Station, TX).


We included 694 subjects free of clinical CVD, with large proportions of women and those with chronic bronchitis and >50 pack-years smoking history (Table 1). Almost half were considered at low cardiovascular risk (10 year CHD risk <10%) by HEART score. As a group, men had significantly higher CAC scores (p < 0.0001) (Fig. 1a) and GDF-15 levels (p = 0.007) (Fig. 1b).
Table 1

Characteristics of COPDGene participants with COPD, by GDF-15 tertiles


All participants (n = 694)

Lower (≤966 pg/mL) (n = 231)

Mid (967-1438 pg/mL) (n = 232)

Higher (≥1439 pg/mL) (n = 231)



 Age (mean, s.d.)

63.6 (8.4)

59.7 (7.4)

64.6 (8.1)

66.4 (8.3)


 Females (%)






 African American (%)






 BMI (mean, s.d.)

27.3 (6.0)

27.5 (6.0)

26.8 (5.7)

27.6 (6.2)


Respiratory status

 FEV1 in L (mean, s.d.)

1.25 (0.64)

1.28 (0.69)

1.20 (0.61)

1.26 (0.60)


 FEV1 % predicted (mean, s.d.)

43.5 (18.8)

42.9 (19.3)

42.9 (18.6)

44.7 (18.4)


 FEV1/FVC % (mean, s.d.)

44.4 (13.6)

44.2 (13.8)

43.9 (13.5)

45.4 (13.6)


GOLD stage (%)



















 mMRC dyspnea score (mean, s.d.)

2.3 (1.4)

2.3 (1.4)

2.2 (1.4)

2.3 (1.4)


 Pack-years smoked (mean, s.d.)

52.2 (25.3)

47.8 (23.6)

52.0 (24.2)

56.8 (27.3)


 Six-minute walking distance, in f. (mean, s.d.)

1163 (395)

1221 (395)

1180 (377)

1087 (403)


 Chronic bronchitis (%)






 Emphysema % (mean, s.d.)

17.1 (14.4)

18.2 (14.7)

17.1 (14.2)

16.0 (14.2)


 Pi10 (mean, s.d.)

3.73 (0.14)

3.72 (0.14)

3.71 (0.13)

3.75 (0.14)


Cardiovascular risk factors (%)

 BMI ≥30












 Currently smoking


















Aggregate 10-year coronary heart disease riska (%)

 Low (<10%)






 Intermediate (10%–20%)






 High (>20%)






Other co-morbidities (%)


























 Stomach ulcers






aBased on the HEART score, as described in the Methods section

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

CAC scores & GDF-15 plasma levels by sex. CAC scores were determined by analysis of non-EKG-gated HRCT and GDF-15 plasma levels were measured by ELISA. a, CAC scores, as Agatston Units; b, GDF-15 concentrations, as pg/mL. Data are median (bar), 25th & 75th percentiles (box), 5th & 95th percentiles (whiskers) with outliers shown as individual points. p-values by Mann-Whitney test

As anticipated, there was a correlation between GDF-15 levels and log2CAC that was modest (r S  = 0.2693; R2 = 0.05982) but significant (p < 0.0001) (Fig. 2). Neither CAC nor GDF-15 correlated with pulmonary artery enlargement, as determined by the ratio of pulmonary artery and aorta diameters (PA:A ratio) [30] (Additional file 1: Table S1), implying that this association did not reflect occult pulmonary hypertension.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Correlation between Log2 CAC & GDF-15 plasma concentrations. p-value by Spearman correlation (r S ), goodness of fit (R2) by linear regression (n = 694)

Comparing participants by GDF-15 tertiles, those in the higher tertile were significantly older, and more often men and non-Hispanic whites (Table 1). Additionally, high GDF-15 tertile participants had greater smoking histories, more frequently had diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia and obesity, and were more frequently classified at intermediate or high risk by HEART score. However, there were no differences in measures of lung function, dyspnea or emphysema severity (Table 1).

In bivariate and multivariate analyses, GDF-15 levels (in tertiles) were associated with higher CHD risk by HEART score and by its components, including age, smoking and diabetes (Additional file 1: Table S2). Again, however, GDF-15 levels were not influenced by common descriptors of COPD severity (GOLD spirometry severity, FEV1, exacerbation history) or phenotypes (chronic bronchitis, measures of emphysema or airway thickness) (Additional file 1: Table S2).

With increasing GDF-15 tertiles, median CAC scores rose, both as absolute values (not shown) and after logarithmic transformation (Fig. 3). There was a stepped increase in CAC scores with increasing GDF-15: relative to the lower GDF-15 tertile, we found 1.19-fold and 2.10-fold increases, respectively, in mid- and highest tertiles. Nevertheless, even in the highest tertile, not all subjects had measurable CAC (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Distribution of Log2 CAC by GDF-15 tertiles. Lower tertile (<966 pg/mL) (n = 231), mid tertile (967-1438 pg/mL) (n = 232), higher tertile (>1439 pg/mL) (n = 231)

In logistic models, GDF-15 contributed significantly to CAC burden (Table 2). The association of GDF-15 and CAC (by severity groups) was strong in the bivariate model (Model 1), and remained of similar magnitude after additionally adjusting for baseline cardiovascular risk (Model 2), for co-morbidities and measures of lung function (Model 3), and for biomarkers (Model 4). Importantly, the magnitude of the GDF-15-CAC association was at least as great as that of the combined classical risk factors included in the HEART score.
Table 2

Adjusted associations of GDF-15 levels and of cardiovascular risk with CAC score among COPDGene participants with COPD (n = 694)


Model 1a

Model 2b

Model 3c

Model 4d

GDF-15 level (in tertiles)

 Lower tertile





 Intermediate tertile

2.52 (1.10, 2.71)

2.30 (1.19, 4.44)

2.16 (1.11, 4.20)

1.87 (0.88, 3.99)

 Higher tertile

5.70 (3.08, 10.56)

4.53 (2.40, 8.54)

4.22 (2.20, 8.07)

4.28 (2.09, 8.76)

Coronary heart disease risk groupe

 Low (<10%)





 Intermediate (10%-20%)


1.49 (0.86, 2.57)

1.46 (0.83, 2.58)

1.33 (0.69, 2.55)

 High (>20%)


2.89 (1.45, 5.77)

3.77 (1.79, 7.94)

3.97 (1.68, 9.35)

All entries represent risk ratio of being in the higher group of CAC and its 95% CI, based on multinomial logistic regression models, in which GDF-15 tertiles are compared again the lower tertile as reference, and the groups of cardiovascular risk by the HEART score are compared with the low-risk group as reference. aModel 1: Bivariate. bModel 2: Model 1 additionally adjusted for baseline coronary heart disease risk group. cModel 3: Model 2 additionally adjusted for race, GOLD spirometry stage, pack-years smoked, chronic bronchitis symptoms, history of exacerbations, measures of emphysema and airway thickness, and co-morbidities (asthma, GERD, mobility-related diseases). dModel 4: Model 3 additionally adjusted for N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide, troponin T and Interleukin-6. eBased on the HEART score, as described in the Methods section

Next, we performed a sensitivity analysis, testing the association in subgroups chosen to minimize known correlation with CAC. First, we restricted analysis to women (Table 3). Second, we excluded those with diabetes, a major contributor to the HEART score that is associated with both CAC and GDF-15 elevation. Third, we restricted analysis to those not smoking at enrollment. Fourth, because low physical activity and a sedentary lifestyle are strong CVD risk factors, we repeated the analysis using only those reporting no walking limitations. None of these pre-planned subgroups analysis significantly modified the association of GDF-15 (higher tertile) with CAC (Table 3).
Table 3

Multivariate models of association of GDF-15 with CAC score among different subgroups of COPDGene participants with COPD


Restricted to


Female participants (n = 327)

Participants without diabetes (n = 634)

Participants not currently smoking (n = 487)

Participants with no walking limitation (n = 304)

GDF-15 level (in tertiles)

 Lower tertile





 Intermediate tertile

2.36 (0.84, 6.64)

1.95 (0.99, 3.84)

1.40 (0.66, 2.98)

1.48 (0.57, 3.87)

 Higher tertile

4.56 (1.62, 12.8)

4.00 (2.06, 7.78)

2.41 (1.13, 5.12)

3.76 (1.63, 10.4)

All entries represent risk ratio of being in the higher group of CAC and its 95% CI, based on multinomial logistic regression models

All models additionally adjusted for race, GOLD spirometry stage, pack-years smoked, chronic bronchitis symptoms, history of exacerbations, and co-morbidities (asthma, GERD, mobility-related diseases)

Finally, we tested whether different markers of COPD phenotype and severity modified this association (Additional file 1: Table S3). Given correlations between airway thickness and cardiometabolic diseases [21], we used two approaches, restricting the analysis to those with less airway disease (lower two tertiles of pi10 distribution) or those with greater emphysema. We also restricted analysis to subjects with less severe airflow obstruction (defined either as spirometry stage 2–3 or FEV1 ≥ 1 L). None of these analyses (Additional file 1: Table S3) changed the associations between GDF-15 and CAC.


This analysis of 694 ever-smokers without clinical CVD at enrollment to the COPDGene cohort demonstrates that GDF-15 independently contributes to subclinical atherosclerosis in COPD. Although GDF-15 is elevated in pulmonary hypertension of any cause, we found no correlation with PA:A ratio. The association of GDF-15 with CAC showed a gradient, and both its magnitude, and its persistence in subgroup analyses, imply that GDF-15 is not simply a surrogate for traditional risk factors. Instead, our findings support the concept [31] that adding GDF-15 to established indicators improves CVD risk estimation. This supposition, which will require additional testing, is most relevant to younger COPD subjects in low GOLD stages, in whom long-term CVD risk could exceed that of respiratory death. Thus, these data have important implications for reducing the impact of multi-morbidity in ever-smokers and also provide potential mechanistic insight into the link between COPD and overt CVD [15].

Reduced lung function as powerfully predicts CVD mortality as total cholesterol [32] but has never been embraced as a modifiable risk factor. Our findings are consistent with reported associations between smoking, airflow limitation and subclinical atherosclerosis, as measured by carotid intimal thickening [33]. We extend those results by using CAC score, which has higher predictive value for incident CVD than carotid plaque [34], and by showing independence from active smoking. That point is important, as GDF-15 is elevated by smoking [3] and cigarette smoke induces its production by human lung epithelial cells in vitro [35].

We extend to stable COPD without clinical CVD the evidence that GDF-15 is an informative biomarker, as established in overt CVD [36, 37]. To our knowledge, the only previous study that analyzed GDF-15 in stable COPD [38] found elevated levels relative to healthy never-smokers, but was underpowered (n = 15) to examine other correlations. Our findings agree with two large (combined n = 2395) studies of community-dwelling elderly individuals without CVD history in showing that GDF-15 adds significant value to predictive models based on accepted CVD biomarkers [14, 15]. Those longitudinal studies additionally found that baseline GDF-15 levels independently predicted all-cause and cardiovascular mortality [14, 39], which we hope to examine in our 694 COPDGene participants. Importantly, associations of GDF-15 with mortality in the general population equal or exceed that of N-terminal pro-BNP and C-reactive protein [14, 15].

However, the clinical value of CAC is debated, and currently only recommended for selected asymptomatic adults at intermediate risk [40]. Data on CAC in COPD are conflicting. A single-center case-control study (n = 162) found no difference in CAC despite higher major adverse cardiovascular events in COPD [41]. By contrast, CAC on non-EKG-gated CTs correlated significantly with all-cause mortality in ECLIPSE, in an analysis including those with known CVD [27]. Interestingly, CAC scores in ECLIPSE did not correlate with FEV1 or exacerbation history. Similarly, we did not find a correlation of baseline GDF-15 levels and common markers of COPD severity and phenotypes. Thus, GDF-15 appears to be a prognostic biomarker of CVD co-morbidity, but not a predictive biomarker of COPD outcomes, in agreement with recent findings suggesting that endothelial dysfunction predicts atherosclerosis in COPD, but does not contribute to airflow limitation [42].

As a biomarker, GDF-15 has both strengths and limitations. Although GDF-15 appears to reflect an integrated stress response [15, 37], understanding the significance of an elevated concentration is complicated by its production by multiple cell-types and in response to disparate stimuli [43]. Elevated GDF-15 may reflect endothelial cell dysfunction, common in advanced COPD and proposed as a shared pathway in CVD development [44]. However, endothelial dysfunction in COPD appears to relate in part to intrathoracic mechanics rather than inflammation [45], and may associate with specific COPD phenotypes [46]. Hence, GDF-15 might be elevated in individual COPD patients for diverse reasons. Thus, like TGF-β itself, GDF-15 may not be simply good or bad, but either, depending on context, underlining the need for greater understanding of its signal transduction in specific cell-types and clinical settings.

Despite the strengths of a well-characterized cohort in which the CAC outcome has been validated [28], potential limitations include information bias, as coexistent diseases were self-reported. Although a significant concern for incident diseases, information bias is less so for prevalent diseases [47]. We attempted to improve the accuracy of excluding baseline CVD by supplementing self-reported diagnoses with history of related treatment or interventions. A second potential limitation is our use of a self-reported risk score to calculate future CHD likelihood, instead of biologic measures included in some common predictive instruments. However, the HEART score is a validated instrument specifically designed to use self-reported data in epidemiologic studies [29]. Finally, our cross-sectional design limits inferences about temporal associations. Nevertheless, we consider our findings robust, consistent with current understanding of associations between CHD and COPD and an advance in understanding the mechanisms involved in both diseases.


We demonstrate that in COPD subjects free of clinical CVD, subclinical atherosclerosis (measured as CAC on ungated HRCT) is frequent; and that GDF-15 contributes, independently of common cardiovascular risk factors and measures of COPD severity or phenotype, to its presence and severity.



Coronary artery calcification


Coronary heart disease


Confidence interval


Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease


Genetic Epidemiology of COPD Study


Cardiovascular disease


Growth differentiation factor-15


Global Initiative for Obstructive lung Disease


Personal heart early assessment risk tool


High-resolution chest computed tomography


Modified medical research council


National health and nutrition examination survey


N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide


The square root of the wall area of a theoretical airway of 10 mm luminal perimeter



The authors gratefully acknowledge the investigators and participants in the COPDGene study. The authors also acknowledge the assistance of Sara Penchev, Lori Stepp and Carla Wilson, National Jewish Health & Research Center, Denver, CO.

Availability of data and materials

The following databases from the NHLBI-sponsored COPDGene study were used and are available to qualified investigators by submission of an ancillary study request to that study ( Final10000_Dataset_12MAR13.dta; CAC_Budoff_07JUL14.dta; LFU_SidLevel_w_Comorbid_31Aug15.dta. Data on the following biomarkers (GDF-15; troponin T; N-terminal-proBNP; and IL-6) are available from the corresponding author, by request.

Authors’ contributions

JLC, CMF and MKH conceived and designed the study, contributed to the analysis and interpretation of data, and produced the first draft. CMF and JDN performed experiments. MJB measured coronary artery calcium scores. CHM, SM, XM, MKH performed statistical analyses. JMW, FJM, EAR, EAK, MTD and FJM contributed to the design, analysis and interpretation of data, and drafting the article. All authors revised the article critically for important intellectual content and approved the final version.

Competing interests

Dr. Carlos H. Martinez has nothing to disclose. Dr. Freeman reports grants from Department of Veterans Affairs, during the conduct of the study; grants from MedImmune, outside the submitted work. Mr. Nelson has nothing to disclose. Dr. Murray has nothing to disclose. Dr. Wang has nothing to disclose. Dr. Budoff reports grants from NIH during the conduct of the study; grants from General Electric, outside the submitted work. Dr. Dransfield reports grants from NHLBI during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Genentech and Yungjin, and contracted clinical trials from Novartis, PneumRx, Pulmonx and Yungjin, outside the submitted work. Dr. Hokanson has nothing to disclose. Dr. Kazerooni has nothing to disclose. Dr. Kinney has nothing to disclose. Dr. Regan has nothing to disclose. Dr. Wells reports grants from NIH/NHLBI, contracted clinical trials from AstraZeneca, and GlaxoSmithKline, and consulting fees from AstraZeneca, all outside the submitted work. Dr. Fernando J. Martinez reports personal fees from Forest, Janssens, GSK, Nycomed/Takeda, Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ikaria/Bellerophon, Genentech, GSK, Janssens, Novartis, Pearl, Pfizer, Roche, Sunovion, Theravance, Axon, GSK, CME Incite, California Society for Allergy and Immunology, Annenberg, Integritas, InThought, Miller Medical, National Association for Continuing Education, Paradigm, Peer Voice, UpToDate, Haymarket Communications, Astra Zeneca, Western Society of Allergy and Immunology from GSK, Informa, Bioscale, Unity Biotechnology, ConCert, Lucid, Methodist Hospital, Prime, WebMD, and other from Mereo, during the conduct of the study; and personal fees, non-financial support and other from Boehringer Ingelheim, non-financial support and other from Centocor, non-financial support from Gilead, Genentech, Ikaria, personal fees and other from Boehringer Ingelheim, Kadmon, Nycomed/Takeda, Pfizer, Veracyte, American Thoracic Society, Academic CME, Falco, National Association for Continuing Education, Axon Communication, from Johnson & Johnson, non-financial support from Biogen/Stromedix, grants from National Institutes of Health, Clarion, Continuing Education, Potomac, Afferent, Adept, outside the submitted work. Dr. Han reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, GSK, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis and UpToDate, and research support from Novartis, outside the submitted work. Dr. Curtis reports grants from NHLBI and the Department of Veterans Affairs, during the conduct of the study; grants from MedImmune, outside the submitted work.

Consent for publication

This study does not report any individual subject data.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Studies and consent procedures were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Participants understood the study purpose, and provided written informed consent before any procedures. Protocols were approved by Institutional Review Boards at VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System (FWA 00000348) and the University of Michigan (FWA 00004969), approval numbers 2010–120752, HUM000014973, respectively, where we conducted laboratory and statistical analysis, respectively, and at all participating clinical sites.

Guarantor statement

Dr. Curtis takes responsibility for the content of this manuscript, including data and analysis.

Sources of support

COPDGene is supported by NHLBI Grants R01 HL089897 and R01 Hl089856. Additional support came from NIH Grants R01 HL122438-02S1 and K23 HL128936 (CHM) and R01 HL122438 (MKH); and from the Department of Veterans Affairs through Merit Review Awards I01 BX001389 (CMF) and I01 CX000911 (JLC). The contents of this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health or the Department of Veterans Affairs, who took no part in manuscript preparation.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, 2215 Fuller Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48105-2303, USA
Research Service, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
The Lung Health Center, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy & Critical Care Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
Medical Service, Birmingham Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, AL, USA
School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
Radiology Department, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
National Jewish Health & Research Center, Denver, CO, USA
Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine Division, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine Division, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
Graduate Program in Immunology, University of Michigan, 2215 Fuller Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48105-2303, USA
Medical Service, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, 2215 Fuller Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48105-2303, USA


  1. Mannino DM, Thorn D, Swensen A, Holguin F. Prevalence and outcomes of diabetes, hypertension and cardiovascular disease in COPD. Eur Respir J. 2008;32:962–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Sidney S, Sorel M, Quesenberry Jr CP, DeLuise C, Lanes S, Eisner MD. COPD and incident cardiovascular disease hospitalizations and mortality: Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program. Chest. 2005;128:2068–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Rohatgi A, Patel P, Das SR, Ayers CR, Khera A, Martinez-Rumayor A, Berry JD, McGuire DK, de Lemos JA. Association of growth differentiation factor-15 with coronary atherosclerosis and mortality in a young, multiethnic population: observations from the Dallas Heart Study. Clin Chem. 2012;58:172–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Feary JR, Rodrigues LC, Smith CJ, Hubbard RB, Gibson JE. Prevalence of major comorbidities in subjects with COPD and incidence of myocardial infarction and stroke: a comprehensive analysis using data from primary care. Thorax. 2010;65:956–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Agarwal S, Rokadia H, Senn T, Menon V. Burden of cardiovascular disease in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Prev Med. 2014;47:105–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Landis SH, Muellerova H, Mannino DM, Menezes AM, Han MK, van der Molen T, Ichinose M, Aisanov Z, Oh YM, Davis KJ. Continuing to Confront COPD International Patient Survey: methods, COPD prevalence, and disease burden in 2012-2013. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2014;9:597–611.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Adeloye D, Chua S, Lee C, Basquill C, Papana A, Theodoratou E, Nair H, Gasevic D, Sridhar D, Campbell H, Chan KY, Sheikh A, Rudan I, Global Health Epidemiology Reference Group (GHERG). Global and regional estimates of COPD prevalence: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Glob Health. 2015;5:020415.Google Scholar
  8. Aryal S, Diaz-Guzman E, Mannino DM. Influence of sex on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease risk and treatment outcomes. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2014;9:1145–54.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Parker DR, Liu J, Roberts MB, Eaton CB. Is inflammatory chronic obstructive pulmonary disease a coronary heart disease risk equivalent? A longitudinal analysis of the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III), 1988-1994. BMC Pulm Med. 2014;14:195.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Wilker EH, Alexeeff SE, Poon A, Litonjua AA, Sparrow D, Vokonas PS, Mittleman MA, Schwartz J. Candidate genes for respiratory disease associated with markers of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction in elderly men. Atherosclerosis. 2009;206:480–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Budoff MJ, Hokanson JE, Nasir K, Shaw LJ, Kinney GL, Chow D, Demoss D, Nuguri V, Nabavi V, Ratakonda R, Berman DS, Raggi P. Progression of coronary artery calcium predicts all-cause mortality. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3:1229–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Raggi P, Gongora MC, Gopal A, Callister TQ, Budoff M, Shaw LJ. Coronary artery calcium to predict all-cause mortality in elderly men and women. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:17–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Izumiya Y, Hanatani S, Kimura Y, Takashio S, Yamamoto E, Kusaka H, Tokitsu T, Rokutanda T, Araki S, Tsujita K, Tanaka T, Yamamuro M, Kojima S, Tayama S, Kaikita K, Hokimoto S, Ogawa H. Growth differentiation factor-15 is a useful prognostic marker in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Can J Cardiol. 2014;30:338–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Daniels LB, Clopton P, Laughlin GA, Maisel AS, Barrett-Connor E. Growth-differentiation factor-15 is a robust, independent predictor of 11-year mortality risk in community-dwelling older adults: the Rancho Bernardo Study. Circulation. 2011;123:2101–10.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Eggers KM, Kempf T, Wallentin L, Wollert KC, Lind L. Change in growth differentiation factor 15 concentrations over time independently predicts mortality in community-dwelling elderly individuals. Clin Chem. 2013;59:1091–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim M, Cha SI, Choi KJ, Shin KM, Lim JK, Yoo SS, Lee J, Lee SY, Kim CH, Park JY, Yang DH. Prognostic value of serum growth differentiation factor-15 in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation. Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2014;77:243–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Freeman CM, Martinez CH, Todt JC, Martinez FJ, Han MK, Thompson DL, McCloskey L, Curtis JL. Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are associated with decreased CD4+ & CD8+ T cells and increased growth & differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) in peripheral blood. Respir Res. 2015;16:94.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Mutlu LC, Altintas N, Aydin M, Tulubas F, Oran M, Kucukyalin V, Kaplan G, Gurel A. Growth Differentiation Factor-15 is a novel biomarker predicting acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Inflammation. 2015;445:155–60.Google Scholar
  19. Han MK, Agusti A, Calverley PM, Celli BR, Criner G, Curtis JL, Fabbri LM, Goldin JG, Jones PW, Macnee W, Make BJ, Rabe KF, Rennard SI, Sciurba FC, Silverman EK, Vestbo J, Washko GR, Wouters EF, Martinez FJ. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease phenotypes: the future of COPD. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;182:598–604.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Martinez CH, Han MK. Contribution of the environment and comorbidities to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease phenotypes. Med Clin North Am. 2012;96:713–27.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Hersh CP, Make BJ, Lynch DA, Barr RG, Bowler RP, Calverley PM, Castaldi PJ, Cho MH, Coxson HO, DeMeo DL, Foreman MG, Han MK, Harshfield BJ, Hokanson JE, Lutz S, Ramsdell JW, Regan EA, Rennard SI, Schroeder JD, Sciurba FC, Steiner RM, Tal-Singer R, van Beek Jr E, Silverman EK, Crapo JD, COPDGene Investigators. Non-emphysematous chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is associated with diabetes mellitus. BMC Pulm Med. 2014;14:164.Google Scholar
  22. Regan EA, Hokanson JE, Murphy JR, Make B, Lynch DA, Beaty TH, Curran-Everett D, Silverman EK, Crapo JD. Genetic epidemiology of COPD (COPDGene) study design. COPD. 2010;7:32–43.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Vestbo J, Hurd SS, Agusti AG, Jones PW, Vogelmeier C, Anzueto A, Barnes PJ, Fabbri LM, Martinez FJ, Nishimura M, Stockley RA, Sin DD, Rodriguez-Roisin R. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: GOLD executive summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;187:347–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hankinson JL, Odencrantz JR, Fedan KB. Spirometric reference values from a sample of the general U.S. population. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;159:179–87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Budoff MJ, Achenbach S, Blumenthal RS, Carr JJ, Goldin JG, Greenland P, Guerci AD, Lima JA, Rader DJ, Rubin GD, Shaw LJ, Wiegers SE, American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular I, Intervention, American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular R, Intervention, American Heart Association Committee on Cardiac Imaging CoCC. Assessment of coronary artery disease by cardiac computed tomography: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation. 2006;114:1761–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte Jr M, Detrano R. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15:827–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Williams MC, Murchison JT, Edwards LD, Agusti A, Bakke P, Calverley PM, Celli B, Coxson HO, Crim C, Lomas DA, Miller BE, Rennard S, Silverman EK, Tal-Singer R, Vestbo J, Wouters E, Yates JC, van Beek EJ, Newby DE, MacNee W. Coronary artery calcification is increased in patients with COPD and associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Thorax. 2014;69:718–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Budoff MJ, Nasir K, Kinney GL, Hokanson JE, Barr RG, Steiner R, Nath H, Lopez-Garcia C, Black-Shinn J, Casaburi R. Coronary artery and thoracic calcium on noncontrast thoracic CT scans: comparison of ungated and gated examinations in patients from the COPDGene cohort. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011;5:113–8.Google Scholar
  29. Mainous 3rd AG, Koopman RJ, Diaz VA, Everett CJ, Wilson PW, Tilley BC. A coronary heart disease risk score based on patient-reported information. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99:1236–41.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Wells JM, Washko GR, Han MK, Abbas N, Nath H, Mamary AJ, Regan E, Bailey WC, Martinez FJ, Westfall E, Beaty TH, Curran-Everett D, Curtis JL, Hokanson JE, Lynch DA, Make BJ, Crapo JD, Silverman EK, Bowler RP, Dransfield MT. Pulmonary arterial enlargement and acute exacerbations of COPD. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:913–21.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Schopfer DW, Ku IA, Regan M, Whooley MA. Growth differentiation factor 15 and cardiovascular events in patients with stable ischemic heart disease (The Heart and Soul Study). Am Heart J. 2014;167:186–192.e181.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hole DJ, Watt GC, Davey-Smith G, Hart CL, Gillis CR, Hawthorne VM. Impaired lung function and mortality risk in men and women: findings from the Renfrew and Paisley prospective population study. BMJ. 1996;313:711–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Iwamoto H, Yokoyama A, Kitahara Y, Ishikawa N, Haruta Y, Yamane K, Hattori N, Hara H, Kohno N. Airflow limitation in smokers is associated with subclinical atherosclerosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;179:35–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Folsom AR, Kronmal RA, Detrano RC, O'Leary DH, Bild DE, Bluemke DA, Budoff MJ, Liu K, Shea S, Szklo M, Tracy RP, Watson KE, Burke GL. Coronary artery calcification compared with carotid intima-media thickness in the prediction of cardiovascular disease incidence: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:1333–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Wu Q, Jiang D, Chu HW. Cigarette smoke induces growth differentiation factor 15 production in human lung epithelial cells: Implication in mucin over-expression. Innate Immun. 2011;18:617-626.Google Scholar
  36. Wollert KC, Kempf T, Peter T, Olofsson S, James S, Johnston N, Lindahl B, Horn-Wichmann R, Brabant G, Simoons ML, Armstrong PW, Califf RM, Drexler H, Wallentin L. Prognostic value of growth-differentiation factor-15 in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome. Circulation. 2007;115:962–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Kempf T, von Haehling S, Peter T, Allhoff T, Cicoira M, Doehner W, Ponikowski P, Filippatos GS, Rozentryt P, Drexler H, Anker SD, Wollert KC. Prognostic utility of growth differentiation factor-15 in patients with chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:1054–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Mueller T, Leitner I, Egger M, Haltmayer M, Dieplinger B. Association of the biomarkers soluble ST2, galectin-3 and growth-differentiation factor-15 with heart failure and other non-cardiac diseases. Clin Chim Acta. 2015;445:155–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Lind L, Wallentin L, Kempf T, Tapken H, Quint A, Lindahl B, Olofsson S, Venge P, Larsson A, Hulthe J, Elmgren A, Wollert KC. Growth-differentiation factor-15 is an independent marker of cardiovascular dysfunction and disease in the elderly: results from the Prospective Investigation of the Vasculature in Uppsala Seniors (PIVUS) Study. Eur Heart J. 2009;30:2346–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Greenland P, Bonow RO, Brundage BH, Budoff MJ, Eisenberg MJ, Grundy SM, Lauer MS, Post WS, Raggi P, Redberg RF, et al. ACCF/AHA 2007 clinical expert consensus document on coronary artery calcium scoring by computed tomography in global cardiovascular risk assessment and in evaluation of patients with chest pain: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical Expert Consensus Task Force (ACCF/AHA Writing Committee to Update the 2000 Expert Consensus Document on Electron Beam Computed Tomography). Circulation. 2007;115:402–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Gaisl T, Schlatzer C, Schwarz EI, Possner M, Stehli J, Sievi NA, Clarenbach CF, Dey D, Slomka PJ, Kaufmann PA, Kohler M. Coronary artery calcification, epicardial fat burden, and cardiovascular events in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0126613.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Chandra D, Gupta A, Strollo Jr PJ, Fuhrman CR, Leader JK, Bon J, Slivka WA, Shoushtari AH, Avolio J, Kip KE, Reis S, Sciurba FC. Airflow limitation and endothelial dysfunction: Unrelated and independent predictors of atherosclerosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;194:38–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Unsicker K, Spittau B, Krieglstein K. The multiple facets of the TGF-beta family cytokine growth/differentiation factor-15/macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2013;24:373–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Urban MH, Valipour A, Kiss D, Eickhoff P, Funk GC, Burghuber OC. Soluble receptor of advanced glycation end-products and endothelial dysfunction in COPD. Respir Med. 2014;108:891–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Clarenbach CF, Sievi NA, Brock M, Schneiter D, Weder W, Kohler M. Lung volume reduction surgery and improvement of endothelial function and blood pressure in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;192:307–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Hueper K, Vogel-Claussen J, Parikh MA, Austin JH, Bluemke DA, Carr J, Choi J, Goldstein TA, Gomes AS, Hoffman EA, Kawut SM, Lima J, Michos ED, Post WS, Po MJ, Prince MR, Liu K, Rabinowitz D, Skrok J, Smith BM, Watson K, Yin Y, Zambeli-Ljepovic AM, Barr RG. Pulmonary microvascular blood flow in mild chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and emphysema. The MESA COPD Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;192:570–80.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Oksanen T, Kivimaki M, Pentti J, Virtanen M, Klaukka T, Vahtera J. Self-report as an indicator of incident disease. Ann Epidemiol. 2010;20:547–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© The Author(s). 2017