Open Access

Prenatal tobacco smoke exposure increases hospitalizations for bronchiolitis in infants

  • Marcello Lanari1,
  • Silvia Vandini2Email author,
  • Fulvio Adorni3,
  • Federica Prinelli3,
  • Simona Di Santo3, 5,
  • Michela Silvestri4,
  • Massimo Musicco3, 5 and
  • on behalf of the “Study Group of Italian Society of Neonatology on Risk Factors for RSV Hospitalization”
Respiratory Research201516:152

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-015-0312-5

Received: 19 February 2015

Accepted: 9 December 2015

Published: 22 December 2015

Abstract

Background

Tobacco smoke exposure (TSE) is a worldwide health problem and it is considered a risk factor for pregnant women’s and children’s health, particularly for respiratory morbidity during the first year of life. Few significant birth cohort studies on the effect of prenatal TSE via passive and active maternal smoking on the development of severe bronchiolitis in early childhood have been carried out worldwide.

Methods

From November 2009 to December 2012, newborns born at ≥33 weeks of gestational age (wGA) were recruited in a longitudinal multi-center cohort study in Italy to investigate the effects of prenatal and postnatal TSE, among other risk factors, on bronchiolitis hospitalization and/or death during the first year of life.

Results

Two thousand two hundred ten newborns enrolled at birth were followed-up during their first year of life. Of these, 120 (5.4 %) were hospitalized for bronchiolitis. No enrolled infants died during the study period.

Prenatal passive TSE and maternal active smoking of more than 15 cigarettes/daily are associated to a significant increase of the risk of offspring children hospitalization for bronchiolitis, with an adjHR of 3.5 (CI 1.5–8.1) and of 1.7 (CI 1.1–2.6) respectively.

Conclusions

These results confirm the detrimental effects of passive TSE and active heavy smoke during pregnancy for infants’ respiratory health, since the exposure significantly increases the risk of hospitalization for bronchiolitis in the first year of life.

Keywords

Tobacco smoke exposure Pregnancy Infant Bronchiolitis Hospitalization Risk factor

Background

Tobacco smoke exposure (TSE) is a worldwide health problem and a risk factor for children’s health particularly for respiratory morbidity during the first years of life [16]. TSE during pregnancy, including both passive and active smoke, is also a well known risk factor for several complications of pregnancy and for respiratory disorders of offspring during the first months of life [13].

Moreover, TSE has been associated to a more severe clinical course of bronchiolitis [4-6], often requiring hospitalization. Viral bronchiolitis is a common lower respiratory tract infection in infants and often requires hospitalization in children younger than 2 years of age. It is characterized by wheezing and mucous plugging, resulting in airway obstruction [7].

Although the detrimental effects of TSE for children’s health are well known, the exposure continues to involve a large amount of infants worldwide: in 2004 about 40 % of the entire pediatric population was exposed to second-hand smoke, with 166,000 of the 5,939,000 respiratory infections and deaths due to this exposure in children younger than 5 years [8]. In several countries, smoke banning laws have been promoted with the aim to reduce the exposure in public places and subsequently protect high risk people, such as pregnant women, newborns and young infants from passive TSE. The introduction of smoke-free legislation in many countries has been related to about a ten percent decrease in preterm births (10.4 %) and in hospital admissions for asthma (10.1 %) [9].

In Italy, the estimated number of smokers is 11.6 million (7.1 million men and 4.5 million women), according to a national report considering the entire Italian population [10]. A comprehensive smoking ban was introduced in 2003 to prohibit smoking in public places, causing a 6.3 % decrease of active smokers in the Italian population [11].

In an Italian cohort study of infants younger than 2 years hospitalized for acute LRTI [12], postnatal TSE results to be a significant risk factor for hospitalization.

To our knowledge, few birth cohort studies [1316] have been carried out that focus on the effect of prenatal TSE via passive and active maternal smoking on the development of lung diseases in childhood, which provide reports that smoke exposure in early life may increase the lung susceptibility to air pollution [16] and that prenatal TSE is related to an earlier onset of asthma. Moreover, no recent birth cohort study has investigated the effect of prenatal and early postnatal TSE on the risk of hospitalization for bronchiolitis during the first year of life.

The aim of the present study is to determine the effects of prenatal passive and active TSE and early postnatal TSE with other risk factors for hospitalization for bronchiolitis in a large cohort of preterm newborns at GA 33 weeks or more and full term newborns.

Methods

Study subjects

This study was promoted by the Italian Society of Neonatology with the National Research Council and involved thirty neonatology units, registering 1,000 births or more each year, in the northern, central and southern areas of Italy. The study was approved by each one of the ethical committees of the participating centres. Parents in the study provided their signed informed consent to participate in the study; details on the modalities of recruitment and of data collection have been described elsewhere [17, 18]. Briefly, all consecutive newborns at 33–34 weeks gestational age (wGA) seen in a recruitment period lasting 1 year from the first enrolment by the participating centres were enrolled. For each enrolled newborn of 33–34 wGA, two newborns of the same sex and with the nearest date of birth were enrolled: one of 35–37 wGA and one of >37 wGA. The enrolment was carried out according to GA with the aim to analyse potential differences related to GA. Exclusion criteria were: life expectancy shorter than 6 months; participation in clinical studies on pharmacological or surgical interventions; haemodynamically significant congenital heart diseases or chronic lung diseases; programmed or administered RSV prophylaxis with a humanized monoclonal antibody (palivizumab). Excluded infants were those not residing in the geographical catchment area of the enrolling neonatology unit hospital.

Data collection

From November 1st 2009 to December 30th 2012, 2,314 newborns (1,113 females and 1,201 males) were enrolled in the study. At time of birth, parents were interviewed with a structured questionnaire on their demographics, health and socio-demographic status, living conditions and TSE. In addition, information on pregnancy, delivery and newborn conditions given by the parents were integrated, when necessary, with the information contained in the clinical record form. The same physician in each center collected the data using a standard record form. After discharge, two structured follow-up phone interviews with the child’s parents were carried out by trained interviewers. The first interview took place during the infective respiratory epidemic season (in Italy from November to March [19]), the second at the 12 month after birth. The interviews collected data on possible environmental risk conditions for bronchiolitis, including household health and crowded living conditions, daily contact with siblings or other children and day care attendance and lack of or early interruption or no breastfeeding.

Assessment of pre- and postnatal TSE

Exposure to tobacco smoke during pregnancy was assessed by asking the mother whether she smoked during pregnancy, and if so, how many cigarettes per day and whether the father or other people smoked regularly in her presence. The information collected was then collapsed into a single variable with the following four categories for prenatal TSE: no; only passive; active with 1–15 cigarettes per day and active with 16 or more cigarettes per day.

Exposure to tobacco smoke after birth was assessed during the two follow-up interviews by asking the parents if the mother, father or other people in the household smoked inside and/or outside of the child’s living environment in the first year of life. Similarly as for prenatal TSE, the information collected was collapsed into a single variable; postnatal TSE with the following three categories: no; outside the child’s living environment and in the child’s living environment. Finally, a third variable was constructed: any tobacco smoke exposure that was comprehensive of any prenatal or postnatal exposure.

Outcome

The main outcome of this study was hospitalization and/or death due to bronchiolitis during the first year of life, as classified by the ICD-9 code 466.1 (codifying for acute bronchiolitis) [20].

During the two follow up interviews, parents were asked about hospitalizations of the child. If the child was referred as having been hospitalized, further confirmation was obtained by retrieval of the hospital record forms or by direct contact with the physician who was responsible of the infant during hospitalization.

Statistical analysis

The cumulative time-dependent risks of hospitalization for bronchiolitis during the first year of life of the infants were calculated with survival analysis. Relative risks were estimated as hazard ratios (HR) with 95 % Confidence Intervals (CI) calculated from the standard errors derived from Cox’s proportional hazard model [21]. Multivariate analyses were carried out to estimate the independent contribution of each considered factor to the risk of bronchiolitis.

In order to identify further potential predictors of bronchiolitis hospitalization besides exposure to tobacco smoke, we used a two-step approach. Firstly, we performed a multivariate analysis within the prenatal and the neonatal variables considered as potential risk factors for bronchiolitis (Table 1 of the Additional file 1). The variables significantly associated with the outcome (the level of statistical significance was set at p-value = 0.05), served for defining the exposure to pre and perinatal risk factors of bronchiolitis. Children were considered prenatally exposed (father suffering from respiratory diseases, no recourse to assisted reproductive technologies and use of corticosteroid therapy for lung maturation) and/or perinatally exposed (male sex, singleton delivery and surfactant therapy), when at least one of these significant risk factors was present. Pre and perinatal exposures were then entered in the final multivariable analysis as single dichotomous variables. Although non statistically significant in the first step of the analysis, age of the mother (continuous variable), parents’ level of education in years of completed school (both less or equal to 8 years, at least one more than 8 and less or equal to 13 years, both more than 13 years) and weeks of gestational age were considered as potential confounding variables and were entered in the final multivariable analysis.
Table 1

Socio-Demographic, pre-, neo-, and post- natal conditions of healthy and bronchiolitis hospitalized infants

  

Hospitalization for bronchiolitis

 

Total

No

Yes

Socio demographic characteristics of parents

   

 Mother’s Age (y, mean ± SD)

33.6 ± 5.3

33.6 ± 5.3

33.2 ± 5.5

 Parents’ Educational Level

   

  Primary, N. (%)

270

251 (12.0)

19 (15.8)

  High, N. (%)

1521

1440 (68.9)

81 (67.5)

  Graduate, N. (%)

419

399 (19.1)

20 (16.7)

Gestational age at birth

   

 Weeks

   

  33–34, N. (%)

737

683 (32.7)

54 (45.0)

  35–37, N. (%)

767

726 (34.7)

41 (34.2)

   > 37, N. (%)

706

681 (32.6)

25 (20.8)

Risk conditions

   

  Prenatal Risk

2092

1974 (94.4)

118 (98.3)

  Neonatal Risk

1945

1837 (87.9)

108 (90.0)

Environmental risk conditions

   

  Exposure to Epidemic Season

1323

1234 (59.0)

89 (74.2)

  No breastfeeding

482

440 (21.1)

42 (35.0)

  Presence of siblings

900

820 (39.2)

80 (66.7)

  Crowded Living Conditions

227

200 (9.6)

27 (22.5)

  Day Care Attendance

357

331 (15.8)

26 (21.7)

Any smoke exposure

1043

976 (46.7)

67 (55.8)

Total

2210

2090 (94.6)

120 (5.4)

We considered also well-known environmental risk factors (RFs) of bronchiolitis as single covariates: exposure to epidemic season (defined as children living for at least one of the first 3 months of life during the calendar period between November to March); no breastfeeding (i.e. feeding of the newborn without breast milk beyond the age of 1 month); presence of siblings or children (less than 10 years old) sharing the same living environments; crowded living conditions (i.e. the presence of five or more people older than 10 years in the living environment of the newborn) and day care attendance.

Sample size was calculated by fixing a predefined precision of the estimate of the absolute risk of hospitalization and/or death for bronchiolitis induced or not by RSV during the first year of life. Assuming that the risk of hospitalization for bronchiolitis during the first year of life was about 7 % a sample size of 2,500 newborns could provide a 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) of 6.0 to 8.1 % which is largely consistent with a random error of less than 20 %.

The level of statistical significance was set for all the analysis at p = 0.05.

The software package used was IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows version 21.0 (Armonk, NY, IBM Corp.).

Results

Of the 2,314 newborns, 104 were not available for the first scheduled follow-up interview and thus the remaining 2,210 (1,150 male and 1,060 female) were considered for this analysis. All of the infants survived the entire follow-up period. One hundred and 20 newborns (5.4 %) were hospitalized for bronchiolitis during the study period, most frequently during the very early period of life (54 % within the 3 month of life). In only 31 newborns hospitalized for bronchiolitis a laboratory test was carried-out resulting positive for RSV in 26 (83 %) cases. Parental socio-demographic and infants’ characteristics are reported in Table 1 by hospitalization for bronchiolitis. Low level of parents’ education, low gestational age and all the considered prenatal, neonatal and postnatal risk conditions were more frequent in infants hospitalized for bronchiolitis. Moreover, any exposure (pre and post-natal) to tobacco smoke was more frequently registered in children who were hospitalized for bronchiolitis

The different exposures and characteristics of the infants according to exposure to tobacco smoke during the prenatal and postnatal life are reported in Table 2. TSE (both prenatal and postnatal) was more frequent in babies born to parents with only primary education. Mothers smoking more than 15 cigarettes per day during pregnancy more frequently had newborns with low gestational ages. Maternal smoking of more than 15 cigarettes per day during pregnancy was associated with an increase of non-breastfeeding of the newborn. Presence of siblings was associated with TSE both of the mother during pregnancy and of the newborn in postnatal life period. Also, living in crowded living conditions was more frequent for newborns exposed to smoke in prenatal and postnatal periods.
Table 2

Association of infants’ pre- and post- natal TSE with socio-demographic, pre-, neo-, post- natal conditions and bronchiolitis hospitalization

  

Prenatal smoking exposure

Postnatal smoking exposure

   

Passive

Active maternal smoking

   

Newborn and parents’ characteristics

Total

None

maternal smoking

≤15 cig/day

>15 cig/day

None

Out of living environment

In living environment

Socio demographic characteristics of parents

        

 Mother’s Age

33.6 ± 5.3

33.9 ± 5.2

32.9 ± 5.1

32.5 ± 5.8

34.0 ± 5.5

34.1 ± 5.2

32.8 ± 5.3

33.5 ± 5.5

 (y, mean ± SD)

 Parents’ Educational Level

        

  Primary, N. (%)

270

159 (9.7)

50 (14.9)

50 (26.3)

11 (27.5)

115 (8.8)

136 (17.1)

19 (17.6)

  High, N. (%)

1521

1122 (68.2)

243 (72.3)

128 (67.4)

28 (70.0)

885 (67.7)

564 (71.0)

72 (66.7)

  Graduate, N. (%)

419

363 (22.1)

43 (12.8)

12 (6.3)

1 (2.5)

308 (23.5)

94 (11.8)

17 (15.7)

Gestational Age at birth

        

 Weeks

        

  33–34, N. (%)

737

559 (34.0)

102 (30.4)

60 (31.6)

16 (40.0)

427 (32.6)

273 (34.4)

37 (34.3)

  35–37, N. (%)

767

560 (34.1)

114 (33.9)

81 (42.6)

12 (30.0)

447 (34.2)

279 (35.1)

41 (38.0)

   > 37, N. (%)

706

525 (31.9)

120 (35.7)

49 (25.8)

12 (30.0)

434 (33.2)

242 (30.5)

30 (27.8)

Risk conditions

        

  Prenatal Risk

2092

1551 (94.3)

323 (96.1)

180 (94.7)

38 (95.0)

1231 (94.1)

760 (95.7)

101 (93.5)

  Neonatal Risk

1945

1445 (88.5)

299 (89.0)

165 (86.8)

36 (90)

1137 (86.9)

712 (89.7)

96 (88.9)

Environmental risk conditions

        

  Exposure to Epidemic Season

1323

998 (60.7)

196 (58.3)

108 (56.8)

21 (52.5)

790 (60.4)

455 (57.3)

78 (72.2)

  No Breastfeeding

482

352 (21.4)

70 (20.8)

45 (23.7)

15 (37.5)

289 (22.1)

169 (21.3)

24 (22.2)

  Siblings

900

644 (39.2)

145 (43.2)

89 (46.8)

22 (55.0)

520 (39.8)

330 (41.6)

50 (46.3)

  Crowded Living

227

160 (9.7)

35 (10.4)

25 (13.2)

7 (17.5)

141 (10.8)

68 (8.6)

18 (16.7)

  Day Care Atten dance Attendance

357

265 (16.1)

43 (12.8)

43 (22.6)

6 (15.0)

221 (16.9)

117 (14.7)

19 (17.6)

Hospitalizations for bronchiolitis (%)

120 (5.4)

77 (4.7)

26 (7.7)

11 (5.8)

6 (15.0)

65 (5.0)

47 (5.9)

8 (7.4)

TOTAL

2210

1644

336

190

40

1308

794

108

Table 3 and Fig. 1 describe the association of tobacco smoke exposure and all considered risk factors, with the risk of hospitalization for bronchiolitis during the first year of life. At univariate analysis, the exposure to any tobacco smoke was associated with a 40 % increased risk of hospitalization (HR = 1.4, 95 % CI 1.0–2.1). When accounting for all the other considered variables in multivariable analysis, the risk was still increased however lost statistical significance (HR 1.3, 95 % CI 0.9–1.9). Moreover, when considering exposure to prenatal tobacco smoke, having a mother smoking more than 15 cigarettes every day or a mother exposed to second hand smoke were associated with a significant risk increase of 3.5 (CI 1.5–8.1) and of 1.7 (1.1–2. 6), respectively. In multivariable analysis these risks remained substantially equal in size and direction. As far as tobacco exposure in postnatal period is concerned, only small non-significant risk increases were observed in univariate analysis that were no longer present in multivariable analysis. Among the other considered variables, the most remarkable results from the multivariable analysis were a negative association with mother’s age and with increasing gestational age at birth, positive significant associations with all the environmental risk conditions and finally, no significant association with parent’s educational level and with prenatal or perinatal risk conditions.
Table 3

Crude and adjusted hazard ratios for risk factors for hospitalization for lower respiratory tract infections in the first year of life

 

Hazard ratios (95 % CI)

 

Crude HR

p-value

Adjusted HR

p-value

Tobacco smoke exposure

    

  Any

1.4 (1.0–2.1)

0.050

1.3 (0.9–1.9)

0.131

  Prenatal

    

    None

1

 

1

 

    Mother smoking ≤15 cigarette

1.3 (0.7–2.4)

0.476

1.0 (0.5–2.0)

0.964

    Mother smoking >15 cigarette

3.5 (1.5–8.1)

0.003

2.4 (1.0–5.7)

0.052

    Mother exposed to passive smoke

1.7 (1.1–2.6)

0.021

1.8 (1.1–2.9)

0.024

  Postnatal

    

    None

1

 

1

 

    Out of living environment

1.2 (0.8–1.8)

0.343

1.0 (0.6–1.5)

0.869

    In living environment

1.5 (0.7–3.1)

0.275

0.9 (0.4–1.9)

0.707

Socio demographic characteristics of parents

    

  Mother’s Age (y)

0.9 (0.8–1.1)

0.344

0.8 (0.7–1.0)

0.055

  Parents’ Educational Level

    

    Primary

1

 

1

 

    High

0.7 (0.5–1.2)

0.256

1.0 (0.6–1.7)

0.956

    Graduate

0.7 (0.4–1.3)

0.215

1.1 (0.6–2.3)

0.727

Gestational Age at birth

    

  Weeks

    

    33–34

1

 

1

 

    35–37

0.7 (0.5–1.1)

0.114

0.7 (0.4–1.0)

0.046

     > 37

0.5 (0.3–0.8)

0.002

0.5 (0.3–0.8)

0.002

Risk conditions

    

    Prenatal

3.4 (0.8–13.8)

0.086

2.3 (0.6–9.7)

0.242

    Perinatal

1.2 (0.7–2.2)

0.497

1.4 (0.7–2.5)

0.315

Environmental risk conditions

    

    Exposure to Epidemic Season

2.0 (1.3–3.0)

0.001

1.9 (1.2–2.8)

0.003

    Breastfeeding

2.0 (1.4–2.9)

0.000

1.8 (1.2–2.7)

0.003

    Siblings

3.0 (2.1–4.4)

0.000

3.2 (2.2–4.8)

0.000

    Crowded living Conditions

2.6 (1.7–4.1)

0.000

2.5 (1.6–3.9)

0.000

    Day care attendance

1.4 (0.9–2.2)

0.113

1.7 (1.1–2.7)

0.015

Fig. 1

Crude and Adjusted Hazard Ratios (HRs) for Prenatal and Postnatal Tobacco Smoke Exposure for bronchiolitis Hospitalization in the First Year of Life. Adjusted for mother’s age (y), parents’ educational level, wGA, prenatal risk conditions, neonatal risk conditions, exposure to epidemic season, breastfeeding, siblings, crowded living, day care attendance

Discussion

The results of this study demonstrate that passive TSE and heavy active smoke exposure during pregnancy increases the risk of hospitalization for bronchiolitis during the first year of life, and in particular, during the first 3 months of life, while postnatal TSE does not significantly increase the risk in our cohort. These results could be explained by the fact that passive exposure is less preventable than active smoking, which is often interrupted during pregnancy. Our results suggest that the detrimental effect on lung development and subsequent higher risk for hospitalization may depend mostly on prenatal exposure rather than to postnatal TSE. This could be due to the fact that most mothers quit smoking during the first trimester, however by this time, the pulmonary system reaches its full development and therefore deleterious influences could play a major role.

The detrimental effects of TSE during pregnancy on fetal growth and lung development have been widely studied. Fetal TSE increases the risk for intrauterine growth retardation, prematurity and impaired lung development through placental vascular damage induced by cotinine, which causes placental insufficiency and nutritional deprivation that may interfere with growth and lung maturation [22] and through epigenetic mechanisms. [2325] These mechanisms are determined by several metabolites derived from tobacco smoke that have low molecular weight and are able to cross the placenta and induce oxidative damage, mitochondrial dysfunction and chronic hypoxia leading to genetic modifications that affect fetal growth and development [26, 27]. Appropriate development of fetal lung requires adequate nutritional intake and placental blood flow as well as the precisely timed gene expression that is, in part, dependent from the extensive combination of DNA methylation and histone modifications. Thus the interference with the normal epigenetic modifications during fetal life can alter gene transcription and may alter lung growth and function [24, 27].

Recently, some authors have observed that fetal growth is also influenced by maternal grandmother smoking habits during pregnancy [28, 29] of non-smoking mothers, likewise, the attitude toward smoking of the grandmother is associated to an elevated risk of asthma in children [30, 31]. The mechanism hypothesized for these effects include a cascade of metabolic knock-on effects involving initial somatic metabolic in utero “programming” of the mother and a direct effect of grandmaternal smoking on oogenesis of her own daughter when she was a fetus [32, 33]. It is possible that by modifying DNA methylation patterns in the fetal oocytes, tobacco-derived metabolites may interfere with both immune function and xenobiotic detoxification mechanisms in the offspring, resulting in an increased susceptibility to respiratory diseases affecting the subsequent generation.

In our study, we found that active smoking during pregnancy has an effect on the risk for bronchiolitis hospitalization that is dose-dependent. We defined heavy smoking mothers who smoked more than 15 cigarettes/day, as previously done in another study [34], with the aim to emphasize the effect of a discrete number of cigarettes. The dose-dependency of active smoking during pregnancy was observed also for growth restriction in previous studies [27, 35]. This result suggests that a reduction in the number of smoked cigarettes, particularly in heavy smokers, may reduce the risk for hospitalization in infants. Moreover, active smoking during pregnancy was associated to lower GA, confirming the effect of tobacco smoke on the risk of preterm birth; the effect of active smoke however was confirmed by the multivariate analysis, establishing that it is independent from GA.

To date, only a few studies have distinguished between prenatal and postnatal TSE and their consequences on respiratory health in early life [36, 37].

The study by Jaakkola et al. [38] demonstrates the strongest adverse effects of tobacco smoke on the lower respiratory tract when smoking takes place during pregnancy. In prenatally exposed children, postnatal exposure from either parent did not significantly increase the occurrence of the respiratory health outcomes analysed by Fuentes-Leonarte et al. [39].

TSE in infants may cause bronchial hyper-reactivity and direct toxic and irritant effects on the lungs and the airways [23]. TSE may increase the susceptibility to pathogens due to impaired protective mechanisms of the airways and bronchial tree, such as mucociliary clearance [4]. Infants of women smokers are more likely to have diminished lung function soon after birth, which could contribute to the development of acute respiratory outcomes such as infections as its concomitant symptoms. [40] We found that postnatal TSE during the first year of life was associated to a slightly higher hospitalization rate without reaching the statistical significance. This limited time span may underestimate the total effect of exposure since assessing respiratory tract infections at older ages might show stronger effects. However, our results are consistent with those obtained by Duijts et al. [41] which analysed a prenatally enrolled birth-cohort and showed weak evidence for an association of maternal smoking in the early postnatal period with bronchiolitis in infants in the first 6 months of life [41].

The strength of the present study is the prospective analysis of a large birth cohort and the inclusion of a large number of other variables that may interact with TSE in the increase of bronchiolitis severity and hospitalization.

One of the limits of the present study is that TSE was assessed on subjective parent report, however other studies reported good agreement between self-reported exposure and biochemical markers dosed in the household environment and in urine samples [4244].. Another limitation is related to the fact that we considered only hospitalizations for bronchiolitis and therefore factors related to both the propensity to recur to hospitalization and to TSE, such as socio-cultural conditions of the parents, which may act as confounders of our results. Nevertheless, we hold the conviction that the universal coverage of the Italian National Health Service, which is free for every Italian citizen, guarantees virtually equal access to hospital medical care to everyone in cases concerning severe bronchiolitis. In our cohort study, heavy active smoking during pregnancy was associated to lack of breastfeeding and to crowded living conditions, and it was more frequent if parents had only primary level education. This data could be explained by the lower attention paid by a subgroup of women during pregnancy to campaigns promoting prenatal and neonatal health. This is an interesting note as it could be useful to identify pregnant women that may require an implementation of counselling to promote breastfeeding and to improve the overall living conditions of their newborns.

Our study supports the evidence of the strongest effects of TSE during pregnancy and supports that smoking cessation campaigns should target all family and household members as well as colleagues in workplaces of non-smoking expecting mothers. Moreover, the knowledge of the detrimental effects of TSE on infants could increase awareness regarding the importance of reducing second-hand smoke exposure, not only in public places but in private households as well as.

Health professionals play a pivotal role in promoting the cessation of active smoking and passive smoke exposure in pregnant women and more should be done: a recent Australian study [45] reported that less than half pregnant women were discourage to stop smoking by healthcare professionals.

Data obtained in the present study could be used by practitioners, obstetricians, neonatologists, pediatricians, midwives and other healthcare professionals in order to improve the information provided during counselling to pregnant women and new parents about the risks of TSE on their offspring. Extended follow up of this cohort of children will allow us to establish whether these exposures are important predictors of asthma in later childhood and a possible cause of permanent impairment of pulmonary function. Moreover, further investigations could be useful to clarify the effect of TSE in pediatric patients with other well known risk factors for hospitalization for bronchiolitis (i.e., prematurity, congenital heart disease, chronic lung disease, immunodeficiency, neuromuscular disease.

Conclusions

Bronchiolitis is a major cause of hospitalization for infants and passive and active maternal TSE during pregnancy seems to be significant RFs that can be modified. According to the tendencies found in this study, the elimination of smoking during pregnancy and the avoidance of second-hand TSE in the environment where pregnant women live are mandatory in order to reduce morbidity of newborns and young infants, also in the presence of other non-modifiable RFs for bronchiolitis. Moreover, since women are more likely to quit smoking during pregnancy than at any other time, there are efforts to increase motivation and help women who are planning to conceive to stop smoking at the procreative phase of their life or during pregnancy. Finally, studies on respiratory tract infections in infants at a later age are necessary to examine the long-term effects of maternal TSE during and after pregnancy. The results of the present study will be used by the Italian Neonatology Society, that supported the study, to improve counselling to families and pregnant women to reduce tobacco smoke exposure.

Abbreviations

AdjHR: 

Adjusted hazard ratio

CI: 

Confidence interval

GA: 

Gestational age

HR: 

Hazard ratio

LRT: 

Lower respiratory tract infections

Rfs: 

Risk factors

RSV: 

Respiratory syncytial virus

TSE: 

Tobacco smoke exposure

wGA: 

Weeks of gestational age

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge Lucy Scioscia for editing this paper.

Co-authors of the “Study Group of Italian Society of Neonatology on Risk Factors for RSV Hospitalization” Faldella G, Spinelli M, Corsello G, La Forgia N, Loprieno S, Boldrini A, Vuerich M, Del Vecchio A, Fabris C, Bertino E, Gaudino M, Coscia A, Fanos V, Puddu M, Gargano G, Braibanti S, Corso G, Orfeo L, De Luca MG, Paolillo P, Fabiano A, Barberi I, Barboni G, Molinari L, Bonomi A, Ladetto L, Carlucci A, Zorzi G, De Curtis M, Natale F, Di Fabio S, Faccia P, Bottau P, Macagno F, Ellero S, Magaldi R, Rinaldi M, Memo L, Nicolini G, Ngalikpima CJ, Nosari N, Sarnelli P, Parmigiani S, Agosti M, Negri C, Corona MF, Piano F, Umbaldo A, Dall’Agnola A, Girardi E, Gabriele B, Aurilia C, Romagnoli C.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Pediatrics and Neonatology Unit, Imola Hospital
(2)
Neonatology Unit, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna
(3)
Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Biomedical Technologies, National Research Council Milan
(4)
Pediatric Pulmonology and Allergy Unit, Istituto Giannina Gaslini
(5)
Department of Neuroscience, Foundation IRCCS Santa Lucia

References

  1. Hill SC, Liang L. Smoking in the home and children’s health. Tob Control. 2008;17(1):32–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Stoddard JJ, Gray B. Maternal smoking and medical expenditures for childhood respiratory illness. Am J Public Health. 1997;87(2):205–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Leung GM, Ho LM, Lam TH. Secondhand smoke exposure, smoking hygiene, and hospitalization in the first 18 months of life. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158(7):687–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Jones LL, Hashim A, McKeever T, Cook DG, Britton J, Leonardi-Bee J. Parental and household smoking and the increased risk of bronchitis, bronchiolitis and other lower respiratory infections in infancy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Respir Res. 2011;12:5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. DiFranza JR, Masaquel A, Barrett AM, Colosia AD, Mahadevia PJ. Systematic literature review assessing tobacco smoke exposure as a risk factor for serious respiratory syncytial virus disease among infants and young children. BMC Pediatr. 2012;12:81.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Carbonell-Estrany X, Fullarton JR, Gooch KL, Vo PG, Figueras-Aloy J, Lanari M, et al. Effects of parental and household smoking on the risk of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) hospitalisation in late-preterm infants and the potential impact of RSV prophylaxis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26(9):926–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. McKiernan C, Chua LC, Visintainer PF, Allen H. High flow nasal cannulae therapy in infants with bronchiolitis. J Pediatr. 2010;156(4):634–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Oberg M, Jaakkola MS, Woodward A, Peruga A, Prüss-Ustün A. Worldwide burden of disease from exposure to second-hand smoke: a retrospective analysis of data from 192 countries. Lancet. 2011;377(9760):139–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Been JV, Nurmatov UB, Cox B, Nawrot TS, van Schayck CP, Sheikh A. Effect of smoke-free legislation on perinatal and child health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2014;383(9928):1549–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ministero della Salute. Dipartimento della Sanità Pubblica e dell’innovazione. Attività per la prevenzione del tabagismo. Rapporto anno 2011. 10 gennaio 2012. Accessed at http://www.salute.gov.it/imgs/C_17_pubblicazioni_1667_allegato.pdf on February 5th, 2015Google Scholar
  11. Forastiere F, Lo Presti E, Agabiti N, Rapiti A, Perucci AC. Valutazione quantitativa dell’impatto sanitario dell’esposizione a fumo passivo in Italia. Istituto Superiore di Sanità. Accessed at http://www.iss.it/binary/ofad/cont/0007.1105443058.pdf on August 5th, 2014Google Scholar
  12. Lanari M, Giovannini M, Giuffré L, Marini A, Rondini G, Rossi GA, et al. Investigators R.A.DA.R. Study group. Prevalence of respiratory syncytial virus infection in Italian infants hospitalized for acute lower respiratory tract infections, and association between respiratory syncytial virus infection risk factors and disease severity. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2002;33(6):458–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Thacher JD, Gruzieva O, Pershagen G, Neuman Å, Wickman M, Kull I, et al. Pre- and postnatal exposure to parental smoking and allergic disease through adolescence. Pediatrics. 2014;134(3):428–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Muraro AP, Gonçalves-Silva RM, Moreira NF, Ferreira MG, Nunes-Freitas AL, Abreu-Villaça Y, et al. Effect of tobacco smoke exposure during pregnancy and preschool age on growth from birth to adolescence: a cohort study. BMC Pediatr. 2014;14:99.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Grabenhenrich LB, Gough H, Reich A, Eckers N, Zepp F, Nitsche O, et al. Early-life determinants of asthma from birth to age 20 years: a German birth cohort study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;133(4):979–88.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Sonnenschein-van der Voort AM, de Kluizenaar Y, Jaddoe VW, Gabriele C, Raat H, Moll HA, et al. Air pollution, fetal and infant tobacco smoke exposure, and wheezing in preschool children: a population-based prospective birth cohort. Environ Health. 2012 Dec 11;11:91.Google Scholar
  17. Lanari M, Prinelli F, Adorni F, Di Santo S, Vandini S, Silvestri M, et al. Study group of Italian society of neonatology on risk factors for RSV hospitalization risk factors for bronchiolitis hospitalization during the first year of life in a multicenter Italian birth cohort. Ital J Pediatr. 2015;41:40.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Lanari M, Adorni F, Silvestri M, Coscia A. Musicco M; Italian study group on risk factors for RSV-related hospitalization. The multicenter Italian birth cohort study on incidence and determinants of lower respiratory tract infection hospitalization in infants at 33 weeks GA or more: preliminary results. Early Hum Dev. 2011;87(1):S43–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Medici MC, Arcangeletti MC, Rossi GA, Lanari M, Merolla R, Paparatti UD, et al. Osservatorio VRS study group. Four year incidence of respiratory syncytial virus infection in infants and young children referred to emergency departments for lower respiratory tract diseases in Italy: the “osservatorio VRS” study (2000–2004). New Microbiol. 2006;29(1):35–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Classificazione delle malattie, dei traumatismi, degli interventi chirurgici e delle procedure diagnostiche e terapeutiche. Versione italiana della ICD-9-CM “International classification of the diseases-9th revision-Clinical Modification” 2007 Accessed at http://www.salute.gov.it/imgs/C_17_pubblicazioni_2251_allegato.pdf on November 10th, 2015Google Scholar
  21. Cox DR. Regression models and life tables. J R Statist Soc B. 1972;34:187–220.Google Scholar
  22. Iñiguez C, Ballester F, Costa O, Murcia M, Souto A, Santa-Marina L, et al. INMA study investigators. Maternal smoking during pregnancy and fetal biometry: the INMA mother and child cohort study. Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178(7):1067–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kum-Nji P, Meloy L, Herrod HG. Environmental tobacco smoke exposure: prevalence and mechanisms of causation of infections in children. Pediatrics. 2006;117(5):1745–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Joss-Moore LA, Albertine KH, Lane RH. Epigenetics and the developmental origins of lung disease. Mol Genet Metab. 2011;104(1–2):61–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Flom JD, Ferris JS, Liao Y, Tehranifar P, Richards CB, Cho YH, et al. Prenatal smoke exposure and genomic DNA methylation in multiethnic birth cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20(12):2518–23.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Milnerowicz-Nabzdyk E, Bizoń A. How does tobacco smoke influence the morphometry of the fetus and the umbilical cord?-Research on pregnant women with intrauterine growth restriction exposed to tobacco smoke. Reprod Toxicol. 2015;58:79–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Suter MA, Anders AM, Aagaard KM. Maternal smoking as a model for environmental epigenetic changes affecting birthweight and fetal programming. Mol Hum Reprod. 2013;19(1):1–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Leslie FM. Multigenerational epigenetic effects of nicotine on lung function. BMC Med. 2013;11:27.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Miller LL, Pembrey M, Davey Smith G, et al. Is the growth of the fetus of a non-smoking mother influenced by the smoking of either grandmother while pregnant? PLoS One. 2014;9(2), e86781.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Li YF, Langholz B, Salam MT, Gilliland FD. Maternal and grandmaternal smoking patterns are associated with early childhood asthma. Chest. 2005;127(4):1232–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Rillamas-Sun E, Harlow SD, Randolph Jr JF. Grandmothers’ smoking in pregnancy and grandchildren’s birth weight: comparisons by grandmother birth cohort. Matern Child Health J. 2014;18(7):1691–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Misra DP, Astone N, Lynch CD. Maternal smoking and birth weight: interaction with parity and mother’s own in utero exposure to smoking. Epidemiology. 2005;16(3):288–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Hyppönen E, Smith GD, Power C. Effects of grandmothers’ smoking in pregnancy on birth weight: intergenerational cohort study. BMJ. 2003;327(7420):898.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Hjern A, Hedberg A, Haglund B, Rosén M. Does tobacco smoke prevent atopic disorders?A study of two generations of swedish residents. Clin Exp Allergy. 2001;31(6):908–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Voigt M, Briese V, Jorch G, Henrich W, Schneider KT, Straube S. The influence of smoking during pregnancy on fetal growth. Considering daily cigarette consumption and the SGA rate according to length of gestation. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2009;213(5):194–200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Burke H, Leonardi-Bee J, Hashim A, Pine-Abata H, Chen Y, Cook DG, et al. Prenatal and passive smoke exposure and incidence of asthma and wheeze: systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2012;129(4):735–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Pattenden S, Antova T, Neuberger M, Nikiforov B, De Sario M, Grize L, et al. Parental smoking and children’s respiratory health: independent effects of prenatal and postnatal exposure. Tob Control. 2006;15(4):294–301.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Jaakkola JJ, Kosheleva AA, Katsnelson BA, Kuzmin SV, Privalova LI, Spengler JD. Prenatal and postnatal tobacco smoke exposure and respiratory health in Russian children. Respir Res. 2006;7:48.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Fuentes-Leonarte V, Estarlich M, Ballester F, Murcia M, Esplugues A, Aurrekoetxea JJ, et al. Pre- and postnatal exposure to tobacco smoke and respiratory outcomes during the first year. Indoor Air. 2015;25(1):4–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Gilliland FD, Li YF Peters JM. Effects of maternal smoking during pregnancy and environmental tobacco smoke on asthma and wheezing in children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;163:429–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Duijts L, Jaddoe VW, Hofman A, Steegers EA, Mackenbach JP, de Jongste JC, et al. Maternal smoking in prenatal and early postnatal life and the risk of respiratory tract infections in infancy. The generation R study. Eur J Epidemiol. 2008;23(8):547–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Seifert JA, Ross CA, Norris JM. Validation of a five-question survey to assess a child’s exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Ann Epidemiol. 2002;12:273–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Matt GE, Wahlgren DR, Hovell MF, Zakarian JM, Bernert JT, Meltzer SB, et al. Measuring environmental tobacco smoke exposure in infants and young children through urine cotinine and memory-based parental reports: empirical findings and discussion. Tob Control. 1999;8(3):282–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Batscheider A, Zakrzewska S, Heinrich J, Teuner CM, Menn P, Bauer CP, et al. GINIplus and LISAplus study groups. Exposure to second-hand smoke and direct healthcare costs in children - results from two German birth cohorts, GINIplus and LISAplus. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:344.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Hoekzema L, Werumeus Buning A, Bonevski B, Wolke L, Wong S, et al. Smoking rates and smoking cessation preferences of pregnant women attending antenatal clinics of two large Australian maternity hospitals. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;54(1):53–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Lanari et al. 2015

Advertisement