- Research
- Open access
- Published:
End-of-life care for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients with acute exacerbation
Respiratory Research volume 23, Article number: 294 (2022)
Abstract
Background
Acute exacerbation (AE) is a major cause of death in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). AE-IPF patients require optimal palliative care; however, the real-world clinical situations are poorly understood. We aimed to survey the palliative care received by AE-IPF patients, especially with respect to opioid use for dyspnea and the end-of-life discussions (EOLd).
Methods
Self-administered questionnaires were dispatched to 3423 of the certified pulmonary physicians in Japan. They were asked to report a care report form of one patient each with AE-IPF who died very recently about opioid use for dyspnea and EOLd. We further explored the factors associated with the early use of opioids for dyspnea.
Results
Among the 3423 physicians, 1226 (35.8%) returned the questionnaire with the report forms of 539 AE-IPF patients. Of 539 AE-IPF patients, 361 (67.0%) received opioids for dyspnea. Of the 361 patients, 72 (20.0%) received opioids during the initial treatment with an intention of recovery (early use), while 289 (80.0%) did when the recovery was deemed impossible. EOLd was held before the onset of AE in 124 patients (23.0%); however, the majority of patients had EOLd after the admission for AE-IPF. EOLd before the onset of AE was significantly associated with the early use of opioids.
Conclusion
In terminally ill AE-IPF patients, opioids are usually administered when the recovery is deemed impossible, and EOLd are rarely held before the onset of AE. Further studies are warranted on the efficacy of opioids for dyspnea and the appropriate timing of EOLd.
Background
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive disease with a prognosis as worse as that of malignant tumours, such as lung cancer, with poor quality of life (QOL) and severe symptoms such as dyspnea [1,2,3,4]. Therefore, palliative care is considered important and has received much attention in recent years [5,6,7,8,9]. In addition, acute exacerbation (AE) is a major cause of death in patients with IPF combined with severe dyspnea and poor prognoses, whose onset is difficult to predict [10,11,12,13]. Therefore, AE-IPF is considered one of the major conditions that can be treated with palliative care. However, there have been only a few empirical studies on palliative care for patients with AE-IPF [13]. There are two important aspects of palliative care for AE-IPF: symptomatic relief from dyspnea and decision making at the end-of-life.
IPF patients suffer from a variety of symptoms during the disease course, most frequently dyspnea [5]. Morphine is often used to treat dyspnea in these IPF patients. Although it has been suggested that morphine may be effective and safe for reducing shortness of breath in IPF patients [14], there is currently no evidence on this specific patient population from the prospective randomised trial [15]. In addition, large clinical trials so far that have examined the efficacy of morphine for dyspnea have only included outpatients and there is no report yet on the efficacy of morphine for dyspnea in hospitalised patients with AE-IPF [16]. We, therefore, believe that it is important to clarify how often and when morphine can be administered for dyspnea of IPF patients with AE in a clinical setting.
Another issue with this specific patient population is end-of-life decision making. As in the case of malignant diseases such as lung cancer, IPF patients need to be provided with a forum for advance care planning (ACP) that includes end-of-life issues such as the limits of treatment, respiratory management at the end-of-life and the place to face death [17]. In former reports, several IPF patients reported that they wished to discuss end-of-life issues early in their diagnosis [18, 19]. Recent guidelines recommend that palliative care should be offered to all patients diagnosed with a serious life-limiting illness and not only for IPF patients [20, 21]. However, the ideal timing of ACP cannot be determined uniformly in actual clinical practice. The timing must be considered during interactions with patients and their families while constantly assessing the disease status and the disease progression [17, 22, 23]. In actual clinical practice, end-of-life discussions (EOLd) are often held at the time when the patient’s condition has progressed [6, 7]. In observational studies of IPF patients, the annual incidence of AE is 4 to 20.0 per 100 patient-years, depending on the study populations [10], and AE accounts for 40% of all deaths [11]. AE can occur at any stage of the disease course and is difficult to predict. Thus, it is important to clarify how end-of-life decisions are made for AE-IPF patients.
The primary aim of this study is to describe the palliative care received by AE-IPF patients, especially with respect to opioid use for palliation of dyspnea and decision making at the end-of-life. Furthermore, we aimed to explore the factors associated with the early use of opioids for dyspnea in patients with AE-IPF.
Methods
This was a nationwide, cross-sectional survey. There were 6846 number of certified pulmonary physicians in Japan. For this study, we randomly identified the half of all the physicians (n = 3426), and questionnaires were distributed to them. These questionnaires were distributed via mail in December 2020, with a reminder sent a month later.
Subjects and procedure
All pulmonary physicians certified by the Japanese Respiratory Society were recruited for this study. The Japanese Respiratory Society is the only approved organisation that issues a certification of pulmonary physicians. The physicians’ names and respective affiliations were obtained from the website of the said Society. The responses were indicative of the subjects’ consent to participation. No reward was provided for the participation. The responses to the questionnaire were voluntary, and confidentiality was maintained throughout the investigations and subsequent analyses. No identification numbers were linked with the original data.
Questionnaire and measurement outcomes
The self-administered questionnaire utilised herein was developed based on a review of the literature and our previous research [8, 9, 18,19,20, 25,26,27]. The study group (composed of eight pulmonary physicians with expertise in the diagnosis and management of ILD and four palliative care specialists) developed the questionnaire to ensure clarity and comprehensiveness. Face validity was confirmed with a pilot test on 14 pulmonary physicians.
Care report form of an IPF patient who died from AE
Based on physicians’ recall, the following information was collected on the most recently treated AE-IPF patient who died (1 patient for each physician). The patient’s age, sex, time from diagnosis to hospitalization, treatment before and after hospitalization and oxygen therapy after hospitalization immediately before death were recorded.
Although we acknowledge the limitation of the reliability and validity of the data about patient status based on the physicians’ recall, we decided to adopt this study design because understanding physician-perceived effectiveness and the appropriateness of the timing of medical interventions could be of value, and the feasibility was high and the limitation was regarded as being acceptable when the aim of the study is hypothesis-gathering.
Opioid use for dyspnea management
We inquired the participants about whether and when opioids were used for dyspnea of their AE-IPF patient. The potential answers included; (1) used and started from the time of disease-modifying treatment with the intention of recovery (early use), (2) used, but started when the recovery was expected to be impossible (late use) and (3) not used at all. In addition, if opioids were not used, the respondents were asked to provide a specific reason as a free comment. The types of opioids (as-needed oral administration, regular oral administration, or continuous parenteral infusion) were also reported. The physician-perceived effectiveness and physician-perceived timing of opioid use were rated on a 6-point Likert scale (1, not effective at all; 2, very little effect; 3, a little effective; 4, effective; 5, very effective and 6, unevaluable) and a 5-point Likert scale (1, too late; 2, late; 3, appropriate; 4, early; and 5, too late), respectively.
End-of-life decision making
We inquired the participants to report to whom they talked about end-of-life decision making from the following: (1) talked to patients only, (2) talked to both the patients and their family members, (3) talked to only the family members and (4) did not talk to any of them. End-of-life decision making investigated in this study was defined as discussion about either incurability, estimated prognosis, use of mechanical ventilation when respiratory failure occurs, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, or preferred place of death, according to previous studies [26, 28]. The timing of the talk was also reported from the following: (1) before the onset of AE, (2) on the admission for AE or (3) when recovery was no longer expected. The physician-perceived timing of EOLd was rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1, too late; 2, late; 3, appropriate; 4, early; and 5, too late).
Background data
As physician backgrounds, information on their age, sex, years of practice, type of hospital, subspeciality and the number of patients with IPF treated in a year, and experience with the national palliative care education programme was recorded by the physicians.
Statistical analysis
All returned questionnaires were analysed. The frequencies and percentages of eligible participants’ responses to each item were calculated. Fisher’s exact test was performed for comparing the proportions among the groups. The between-group differences were assessed using the Mann-Whitney U test.
To explore the factors associated with opioid use, we classified the respondents into two groups based on the timing of opioid administration: (1) patients who received opioids during initial disease-modifying treatment with the intention of recovery (the early use) and (2) patients who received opioids when the recovery was expected to be impossible (the late use). Univariate logistic regression analyses were performed to screen based on the patients’ demographics, that is, age, sex, time from diagnosis to hospitalization, treatment before and after hospitalization and home oxygen therapy before hospitalization. Next, to identify the independent determinants, all factors with p < 0.05 values were identified in univariate analyses and entered into multivariate logistic regression analyses.
All statistical analyses were performed by using EZR (Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan)—a graphical user interface for R (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) 23—with statistical significance set at p < 0.05 [29]. The approval of the study protocol by an ethics committee was not required according to the national policies in Japan and therefore not obtained. Information that could be used to identify individual patients was not obtained, and the physicians responded spontaneously and anonymously.
Results
Participants
Among the 3423 eligible participants, 1226 completed the questionnaire (response rate: 35.8%). In the questionnaire respondents, participants who were not engaged in the practice of IPF and had not cared for any IPF patients in the past 1 year or had not listed case reports were excluded from the study (Fig. 1). The participants who had cared for at least one IPF patient in the last year and had a case report form were 539 (44% of the 1226 questionnaire respondents). The characteristics of participants are summarised in Table 1.
The schematic of the study flow chart IPF: idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Characteristics of patients with AE of IPF
The baseline characteristics of patients with AE-IPF are summarised in Table 2. Among the 539 patients, 429 (79.6%) were men. 410 patients (76.1%) had been diagnosed with IPF over a year before hospitalization for AE-IPF, and 126 (23.4%) had done within one year of hospitalization of AE-IPF. A total of 249 (46.2%) patients were treated with an anti-fibrotic agent and 312 (57.9%) patients were treated with home oxygen therapy before hospitalization. Regarding oxygen therapy immediately before death, 179 (33.2%) patients were receiving conventional oxygen therapy, 261 (48.4%) were receiving high-flow nasal cannula and 90 (16.7%) were receiving mechanical ventilation.
Opioid use for dyspnea of AE-IPF patients
Of the 539 patients with AE-IPF, 361 (67.0%) patients were administered opioids for dyspnea due to AE and 178 (33.0%) were not (Fig. 2 A). Of the 361 patients who used opioids, only 72 (20.0%) received opioids during the initial disease-modifying treatment with an intention of recovery (early use), while 289 (80.0%) received opioids when the recovery was deemed impossible. The continuous parenteral infusion was the most common type of opioid administration (Fig. 2B). The specific reasons for which opioids were not used for dyspnea are depicted in Supplementary e-Table 1. The three major reasons for not using opioids were as follows: no complaints of dyspnea (n = 34), no time to use opioids due to the rapid progression of the disease (n = 22) and the complications of impaired consciousness (n = 22). Of the 361 patients who used opioids, 217 (60.1%) rated the opioids as effective or very effective for dyspnea and 249 (69.0%) rated the timing of opioid use for dyspnea as appropriate (Table 3). Continuous infusion of parenteral benzodiazepines was performed in 185 (34.3%) patients (data not shown). Comparison of patient backgrounds based on the timing of opioid administration and the early or late use showed no difference in the patient backgrounds before hospitalization between the two groups (Supplementary e-Table 2). There were no significant differences in the administration of corticosteroid and immunosuppressive agent as treatments for AE-IPF between the two groups. The use of high flow nasal cannula as oxygen therapy for AE-IPF was more frequent in the late use group (60.6%) than in the early use group (45.8%). No significant differences were observed in the use of NPPV or invasive mechanical ventilation between the two groups. In the early use group, 59.7% of the participants rated opioids as effective or very effective. In the late-use group, 60.2% of the participants rated the opioids as effective or very effective (Supplementary e-Table 2).
Opioid use for dyspnea in patients with AE-IPF. (A) Proportion of opioid use for dyspnea in patients with AE-IPF (n = 539) and the timing of opioid administration in AE-IPF patient with opioid use (n = 361). (B) Type of opioid used for dyspnea in AE-IPF patients AE: acute exacerbation; IPF: idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
End-of-life decision making of AE-IPF patients
The majority of the participants (64.0%) reported that they held EOLd with both the IPF patients and the family members (Fig. 3 A). As shown in Fig. 3B, EOLd was held before the onset of AE in 124 patients (23.0%); however, 334 patients (62.0%) had EOLd after the admission for AE-IPF and 73 patients (14.0%) had EOLd when recovery was no longer expected. Of the 536 participants, except for 3, who did not hold EOLd with either the patients or family members, 334 (62.3%) rated the timing of EOLd as being appropriate (Table 3).
End-of-life discussion in patients with AE-IPF. (A) With whom were the end-of life discussions held. (B) When were the end-of life discussions held. AE: acute exacerbation; IPF: idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Comparison of the patients who had EOLd before hospitalization with those who had EOLd after the hospitalization, the patients with EOLd before hospitalization had a longer period from the time of IPF diagnosis to admission for AE-IPF when compared to those with EOLd after hospitalization (Supplementary e-Table 3). The patients with EOLd before hospitalization received home oxygen therapy more frequently (Supplementary e-Table 3). The appropriate rate of the physician-perceived timing of EOLd was higher in patients with EOLd before hospitalization (81.1%) when compared with those with EOLd after hospitalization (56.5%) (Supplementary e-Table 3).
Factors associated with the early use of opioids
We next evaluated the factors associated with the early use of opioids for dyspnea in patients with AE-IPF. The results of univariate and multivariate analyses are summarised in Table 4. In the univariate analyses, EOLd before the onset of AE-IPF was significantly associated with the participants’ decisions of early use of opioids (OR 1.89, 95%CI 1.29–2.87, p = 0.002). In contrast, antifibrotic treatment before hospitalization was found to be negatively associated with the participants’ decisions of early use of opioids (OR 0.52, 95%CI 0.38–0.71, p < 0.001). Multivariate analyses revealed that EOLd before the onset of AE-IPF was positively associated with the participants’ decisions of early use of opioids (OR 1.86, 95%CI 1.29–2.87, p < 0.01), and the antifibrotic treatment before hospitalization was negatively correlated with the participants’ decisions of early use of opioids (OR 0.54, 95%CI 0.39–0.75, p < 0.01).
Discussion
This nationwide survey of pulmonary physicians revealed the end-of-life care of IPF patients who died of AE. To the best of our best knowledge, no past report has provided detailed information about the end-of-life of IPF patients who died of AE.
The first and most important finding of the present study was to reveal the frequency and timing of opioids use for dyspnea in patients with AE-IPF. In this study, opioids were administered for dyspnea in 67% of the patients with AE-IPF. Not limiting to AE-IPF patients, our previous study reported the end-of-life picture of 177 deceased ILD patients, which included 78 IPF patients and 99 patients who died of AE [30]. In that study, 58.2% of the patients received opioids in the 2 days before death. The rate of opioid use in this study was similar to that in a previous study; these findings confirmed that 60–70% of all IPF patients with fatal complications received opioids at any time of the dying process. In most cases (80%), however, opioids were administered when the recovery was expected to be impossible; in only 20% of the cases, opioids were administered from the time of disease-modifying treatment with the intention of recovery. On the whole, approximately 60% of the participants reported that opioid was effective for dyspnea and that the proportion of participants who believed that the timing of opioid administration was appropriate tended to be higher in the early use group than in the late-use group (79.2% vs. 66.4%; p = 0.096, e-Table 2). These results thus suggest that opioids can be expected to have a certain effect on dyspnea during AE and may be better to start concurrently with the treatment for AE. In the future, a controlled trial would be needed for IPF patients with AE to clarify the best timing for the administration and optimisation of the treatment efficacy.
The second important finding of this study is that only 23% of the IPF patients had EOLd before the onset of AE-IPF. In our previous study, only 13.3% of ILD patients had EOLd before admission, which was similarly low as in the present study [30]. Moreover, 81.1% of the participants who held EOLd before the onset of AE rated the timing of discussions as appropriate when compared with 56.5% of those who held EOLd after hospital admission (p < 0.001, e-Table 3). The results of this study confirmed that pulmonary specialists believe that EOLd should normally be conducted early in the diagnosis of IPF, albeit, in reality, they often took place after the disease had progressed or worsened [28]. The fact that early EOLd is associated with early opioid use suggests that EOLd before the onset of AE-IPF is of great significance to provide appropriate symptom relief for IPF patients. A recent study from Canada on a small population of IPF patients demonstrated that the multidisciplinary care (MDC) model reduced hospital admissions of patients in their last year of life when compared with those not receiving MDC [31]. In this model, ACP discussions were conducted early in the intervention. Several large-scale studies in recent years have demonstrated the effectiveness of early EOLd [32, 33]. Prospective randomized intervention studies including ACP and palliative care from the early stage of diagnosis are underway in IPF patients as well, with results awaited [34].
In the present study, the incidence of acute exacerbations (AE) of IPF within one year after IPF diagnosis was 23.4%, which was relatively higher than that in a former report [10]. As the present study dealt with participants’ most recent experiences of ‘fatal cases of AE- IPF’, the patient’s condition might have been relatively severe at the time of IPF diagnosis, which may be related to a higher incidence of onset of AE within one year after IPF diagnosis. The early onset of AE after diagnosis of IPF may be related to late-use of opioids for dyspnea and less frequent decision-making before the onset of AE in patients with IPF.
In multivariate analyses, antifibrotic treatments before hospitalization are negatively correlated with the decisions of early use of opioids. In terminally ill cancer patients, chemotherapy in the last months of life has been associated with intensive care (e.g., ICU admission, resuscitation) at the end-of-life, which reduces the QOL at the end-of-life and delayed palliative care intervention [35,36,37,38]. For patients with IPF, antifibrotic agents are the only treatments that have been proven to decelerate the disease progression [39, 40]. No other effective drugs have been available in the treatment of IPF. In this difficult clinical situation for IPF, physicians may have excessive expectations of the recovery of patients who were treated with antifibrotic agents, which may be associated with the delayed use of opioids in AE-IPF patients treated with antifibrotic agents before their hospitalization.
The strength of this nationwide survey is that the subjects were recruited from pulmonary physicians who treated IPF patients in their daily practice throughout the country, which is highly likely to reflect the actual clinical practice and the number of cases (n = 539) being very large. In addition, since this is the most recent medical experience of participants involved in IPF treatment, it can be treated as the latest data on the death of AE-IPF patients. Despite the strength of the nationwide survey, this study has several limitations. First, this is a questionnaire survey that does not provide detailed patient information based on medical records alone. Second, it may not completely reflect the usual medical practice of the participants as it describes a single case that the participants experienced most recently. Third, the response rate was moderate (35.8%) and the baseline characteristics of non-responders were not available.
Conclusion
Among the IPF patients who died of AE, the main timing of opioid use for dyspnea was after the physicians had determined that recovery was no longer expected, and EOLd were rarely held before the onset of AE. A high-quality study is highly warranted on the efficacy of opioids for dyspnea and the appropriate timing of EOLd in patients with IPF.
Data Availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Abbreviations
- ACP :
-
Advance Care Planning.
- AE :
-
Acute Exacerbation.
- EOLd :
-
End-of-Life discussions.
- IPF :
-
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.
- SD :
-
Standard Deviation.
References
1. King TE Jr, Schwarz MI, Brown K, K Brown, J A Tooze, T V Colby, J A Waldron Jr, A Flint, W Thurlbeck, R M Cherniack: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: relationship between histopathologic features and mortality. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001; 164: 1025–1032.
2. Raghu G, Collard HR, Egan JJ, Martinez FJ, Behr J, Brown KK, Colby TV, Cordier JF, Flaherty KR, Lasky JA, et al: An official ATS/ ERS/JRS/ALAT statement: idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011; 183: 788–824.
3. Raghu G, Rochwerg B, Zhang Y, Cuello Garcia CA, Azuma A, Behr J, Brozek JL, Collard HR, Cunningham W, Hommaet S et al: An Official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Clinical Practice Guideline: Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. An Update of the 2011 Clinical Practice Guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015; 192: e3-e19.
4. Raghu G, Remy-Jardin M, Myers JL, Richeldi L, Ryerson CJ, Lederer DJ, Behr J, Cottin V, Danoff SK, Morell F et al: Diagnosis of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. An Official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Clinical Practice Guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018; 198: e44-e68.
5. Bajwah S, Higginson IJ, Ross JR, Wells AU, Birring SS, Riley J, J Koffman J: The palliative care needs for fibrotic interstitial lung disease: a qualitative study of patients, informal caregivers and health professionals. Palliat Med. 2013; 27: 869–876.
6. Lindell KO, Liang Z, Hoffman LA, Rosenzweig MQ, Saul MI, Pilewski JM, Gibson KF, Kaminski N: Palliative care and location of death in decedents with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Chest. 2015; 147: 423–429.
7. Ahmadi Z, Wysham NG, Lundstrom S, Janson C, Currow DC, Ekström M: End-of-life care in oxygen-dependent ILD compared with lung cancer: a national population-based study. Thorax. 2016; 71: 510–516.
8. Rozenberg D, Sitzer N, Porter S, Weiss A, Colman R, Reid WD, Shapera S, Fisher J, Wentlandtet K: Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Review of Disease, Pharmacological, and Nonpharmacological Strategies With a Focus on Symptoms, Function, and Health-Related Quality of Life. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020; 59:1362–1378.
9. Zou RH, Kass DJ, Gibson KF, Lindell KO: The Role of Palliative Care in Reducing Symptoms and Improving Quality of Life for Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Review. Pulm Ther. 2020;6:35–46.
10. Collard HR, Ryerson CJ, Corte TJ, Jenkins G, Kondoh Y, Lederer DJ, Lee JS, Maher TM, Wells AU, Antoniou KM et al: Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. An international Working Group Report. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;194:265–275.
11. Natsuzaka M, Chiba H, Kuronuma K, Otsuka M, Kudo K, Mori M, Bando M, Sugiyama Y, Takahashi H: Epidemiologic survey of Japanese patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and investigation of ethnic differences. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;190:773–779.
12. Kondoh Y, Cottin V, Brown KK: Recent lessons learned in the management of acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur Respir Rev. 2017;26:170050
13. Biondini D, Balestro E, Sverzellati N, Cocconcelli E, Bernardinello N, Ryerson CJ, Spagnolo P: Acute exacerbations of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (AE-IPF): an overview of current and future therapeutic strategies. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2020;14:405–414.
14. Kohberg C, Andersen CU, Bendstrup E: Opioids: an unexplored option for treatment of dyspnea in IPF. Eur Clin Respir J. 2016;10;3:30629.
15. Kronborg-White S, Andersen CU, Kohberg C, Hilberg O, Bendstrup E: Palliation of chronic breathlessness with morphine in patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease – a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Respir Res. 2020; 21:195.
16. Currow D, Louw S, McCloud P, Fazekas B, Plummer J, McDonald CF, Agar M, Clark K, McCaffrey N, Ekström MP: Regular, sustained-release morphine for chronic breathlessness: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Thorax. 2020;75:50–56.
17. Michael K, Elisabeth B, Anne-Marie R, Bajwah S, Lindell K, Adir Y, Brown CE, Calligaro G, Cassidy N, Corte TJ et al: Palliative care in interstitial lung disease: living well. Lancet Respir Med. 2017; 5: 968–980.
18. Bajwah S, Koffman J, Higginson IJ, Ross JR, Wells AU, Birring SS, Riley J: ‘I wish I knew more…’ the end-of-life planning and information needs for end-stage fibrotic interstitial lung disease: views of patients, carers and health professionals. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2013;3:84–90.
19. Kalluri M, Orenstein S, Archibald N, Pooler C: Advance Care Planning Needs in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Qualitative Study. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2021;26;10499091211041724.
20. NCP. National Consensus Project Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care, 4th edition. 2018. https://www.nationalcoalitionpc.org/ncp/. Accessed 28 Oct 2021.
21. Ferrell B, Twaddle ML, Melnick A, Meier DE: National consensus project clinical practice guidelines for quality palliative care guidelines, 4th edition. J Palliat Med. 2018;21:1684–9.
22. Brown AW, Fischer CP, Shlobin OA, Buhr RG, Ahmad S, Weir NA, Nathan SD: Outcomes after hospitalization in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a cohort study. Chest. 2015;147:173–179
23. Perelas A, Glennie J, van Kerkhove K, Li M, Scheraga RG, Olman MA, Culver DA: Choice of antifibrotic medication and disease severity predict weight loss in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2019;59:101839.
24. Brown CE, Jecker NS, Curtis JR. Inadequate palliative care in chronic lung disease. An issue of health care inequality. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2016;13:311e316.
25. Bami S, Alonso A, Rodriguez-Portal JA, Viladot M, Giner J, Aparicio F, Romero-Ortiz A, Acosta O, Castillo D: Palliative care in diffuse interstitial lung disease: result of a Spanish survey. Arch Bronconeumol 2018;54:123e127.
26. Mori M, Shimizu C, Ogawa A, Okusaka T, Yoshida S, Morita T: A National Survey to Systematically Identify Factors Associated With Oncologists’ Attitudes Toward End-of-Life Discussions: What Determines Timing of End-of-Life Discussions?. Oncologist. 2015;20:1304-11.
27. Akiyama N, Fujisawa T, Morita T, Mori K, Yasui H, Hozumi H, Suzuki Y, Karayama M, Furuhashi K, Enomoto N et al: Palliative Care for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Patients: Pulmonary Physicians’ View. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020;60:933–940.
28. Keating NL, Landrum MB, Rogers SO Jr, Baum SK, Virnig BA, Huskamp HA, Earle CC, Kahn KL: Physician factors associated with discussions about end-of-life care. Cancer 2010;116:998–1006.
29. Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely-available easy-to-use software “EZR” (Easy R) for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013; 48: 452–458.
30. Koyauchi T, Suzuki Y, Kazuki S, Hozumi H, Karayama M, Furuhashi K, Fujisawa T, Enomoto N, Nakamura Y, Inui N et al: Quality of dying and death in patients with interstitial lung disease compared with lung cancer: an observational study. Thorax. 2021;76:248–255.
31. Kalluri M, Claveria F, Ainsley E, Haggag M, Armijo-Olivo S, Richman-Eisenstat J: Beyond Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Diagnosis: Multidisciplinary Care With an Early Integrated Palliative Approach Is Associated With a Decrease in Acute Care Utilization and Hospital Deaths. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018;55:420–426.
32. Bernacki R, Paladino J, Neville BA, Hutchings M, Kavanagh J, Geerse OP, Lakin J, Sanders JJ, Miller K, Lipsitz S, et al: Effect of the Serious Illness Care Program in Outpatient Oncology: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2019; 179: 751–759.
33. Paladino J, Bernacki R, Neville BA, Kavanagh J, Miranda SP, Palmor M, Lakin J, Desai M, Lamas D, Sanders JJ et al: Evaluating an Intervention to Improve Communication Between Oncology Clinicians and Patients With Life-Limiting Cancer: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial of the Serious Illness Care Program. JAMA Oncol. 2019; 5: 801–809.
34. Lindell KO, Nouraie M, Klesen MJ, Klein S, Gibson KF, Kass DJ, Rosenzweig MQ: Randomised clinical trial of an early palliative care intervention (SUPPORT) for patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and their caregivers: protocol and key design considerations. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2018;19:e000272.
35. Wu CC, Hsu TW, Chang CM, Lee CH, Huang CY, Lee CC: Palliative Chemotherapy Affects Aggressiveness of End-of-Life Care. The Oncologist. 2016;21:771–777
36. Wright AA, Zhang B, Keating NL, Weeks JC, Prigerson HG: Associations between palliative chemotherapy and adult cancer patients’ end of life care and place of death: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2014;4;348:g1219.
37. Prigerson HG, Bao Y, Manish A et al: Chemotherapy Use, Performance Status, and Quality of Life at the End of Life. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1:778–784.
38. Rochigneux P, Raoul JL, Beaussant Y, Paulk ME, LeBlanc TW, Schneider BJ, Garrido MM, Reid MC, Berlin DA, Adelson KB et al: Use of chemotherapy near the end of life: what factors matter? Ann Oncol. 2017;28:809–817.
39. Richeldi L, du Bois R.M, Raghu G, Azuma A, Brown KK, Costabel U, Cottin V, Flaherty KR, Hansell DM, Inoue Y et al: Efficacy and safety of nintedanib in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:2071-82.
40. Talmadge E King Jr, Bradford W.Z., Castro-Bernardini S, Fagan EA, Glaspole I, Glassberg MK, Gorina E, Hopkins PM, Kardatzke D, Lancaster L et al: A phase 3 trial of pirfenidone in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:2083-92.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
This research is supported by Grant-in-Aid for Diffuse Lung Diseases Research Group from the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. The funding source had no role in the design of the study, the collection and analysis of the data, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
N.A., T.F., T.M.: Conception and design of the work, acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data, statistical analysis and manuscript writing; T.K., Y.M., M.M., M.M.: conception and design of the work, acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data; R.T., K.T., H.T., S.H., Y.K., Y.I.: conception and design of the work, acquisition; T.S.: conception and design of the work, acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data and administrative support. All authors reviewed and confirmed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The approval of the study protocol by an ethics committee was not required according to the national policies in Japan and therefore not obtained.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Akiyama, N., Fujisawa, T., Morita, T. et al. End-of-life care for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients with acute exacerbation. Respir Res 23, 294 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-022-02204-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-022-02204-5