Skip to main content

Challenges in the diagnosis of asthma in children, what are the solutions? A scoping review of 3 countries in sub Saharan Africa

Abstract

Background

Asthma is the commonest chronic respiratory tract disease in children. In low-income countries, challenges exist in asthma diagnosis. In surveys done in children, the prevalence of ‘asthma’ defined by symptoms is high compared to ‘doctor diagnosed asthma’. The questions answered by this review are (i) What challenges have been experienced in the diagnosis of asthma in children? (ii) What solutions will address these challenges?

Methods

The Arksey and O’Malley’s framework for scoping reviews was used for the study methodology, while the PRISMA-ScR checklist guided the reporting process. Electronic databases: PubMed Central, EMBASE and Google Scholar were searched. Primary quantitative and qualitative studies and reviews from 2010 to 2021, from Nigeria, South Africa and Uganda written in English or translated to English, which answered the study questions were included. The author, title, country, study type, methods, purpose, findings and references were captured onto a predefined data collection table. The ‘Preview, Question, Read, Summarise’ system was used and a narrative report was used to summarise the findings.

Results

A total of 28 studies were included. The causes of under-diagnosis of asthma include lack of community knowledge and perception of asthma, poor accessibility to health care, strained health systems, lack of diagnostic tests including spirometry, low levels of knowledge among health-care workers and lack of or non-implementation of asthma guidelines. Strategies to improve asthma diagnosis will include community and school based education programmes, revision of asthma diagnostic terms, guideline development and implementation and health systems strengthening.

Conclusion

This scoping review provides research evidence for policy makers and health-workers involved in the care of asthmatic children on challenges faced in asthma diagnosis and strategies to improve asthma diagnosis.

Background

Asthma is the most common chronic respiratory tract disease in children. According to the Global Asthma Report of 2018, asthma was reported to affect about 339.4 million people globally and 14% of children below 15 years of age [1]. Time trends in the prevalence of reported asthma symptoms in children below 15 years of age in low to middle income countries (LMIC) have shown a proportionate increase from 12.1% in 1990 to 13.9% in 2010 [2]. The main cause of this increase is increased urbanization with the associated pollution [3]. Phase 111 ISAAC data from Africa suggest that the prevalence of childhood asthma ranges from 4 to 21.5% in children aged 13–14 years [4]. Latest data show that the highest prevalence of asthma in Sub Saharan Africa (21.3%) as measured by self-reported current wheeze has been reported in South African adolescents [5].

Children in LMIC tend to have severe asthma symptoms [6, 7]. The reason for this is not well described and may be due to lack of awareness of asthma symptoms, use of solid fuel, asthma underdiagnosis and strained health systems with inadequate asthma care [8].

No gold standard exists for asthma diagnosis [9]. A combination of the suggestive symptoms of intermittent cough, wheeze, difficulty breathing, chest tightness, family history of atopy or asthma, audible wheezes on examination and demonstration of variable airway reversibility makes the diagnosis of asthma more likely [10]. A number of international guidelines on asthma diagnosis exist including Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) [10], National Asthma Education Prevention Programme /Expert Panel Report (NAEPP/EPR) [11] and National Institute for Care Excellence (NICE) [12].

Evidence of the under-diagnosis and mis-diagnosis of asthma

While reviews from low income countries have revealed that there is under-diagnosis or mis-diagnosis of asthma [13,14,15,16] with a preference for infectious respiratory diseases, studies from high income countries suggest over-diagnosis of asthma. A systematic review of studies in children and adults showed that 20 to 70% of asthmatics are under-diagnosed while 30 to 35% are over-diagnosed [17]. In Sub Saharan Africa (SSA), several studies have reported that asthma is under-diagnosed in children. Prevalence of ‘asthma’ defined by symptoms was reported to be as high as 24–27% compared to the prevalence of ‘doctor diagnosed asthma’ reported to be 2.2% in community surveys in children in Nigeria [18]. Several studies done in South Africa [19,20,21] and Uganda [22] have revealed that childhood asthma is under-diagnosed.

The rationale for the review

About 60–80% of asthmatic children show signs in the first 5 years of life [23, 24]. Diagnosis of asthma is crucial to precise treatment. Asthma is associated with school absence [25], repeated presentation to the emergency department [26], Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease [27] and decreased lung function in adulthood [28]. Missing a diagnosis of asthma particularly in infants and children, may lead to increased morbidity and mortality due to this disease as shown in a Ugandan study [22].

To date, there has not been a review that is dedicated to report on the challenges in the diagnosis of childhood asthma and possible solutions thereof.

The main aim of this review was to summarise the evidence on diagnosis of asthma in children in Nigeria, South Africa and Uganda. This study answers these specific questions: (i) What challenges have been experienced in the diagnosis of asthma in children? (ii) What possible solutions have been suggested or implemented to curb the challenges in diagnosis of asthma in children?

Methods

The protocol for this scoping review was registered on the Open Science Framework https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/RD6XT.

Study design

The Arksey and O’Malley’s framework for scoping reviews was utilised as the methodological framework [29], while the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis PRISMA-2020-checklist guided the process of the review and reporting of findings [30] (Additional file 1). A scoping review rather than a systematic review with meta-analysis was done because of the broad scope of the information collected and the heterogeneity of the study designs. Quantitative, qualitative studies and reviews were included in this scoping review. Inclusion of qualitative evidence was meant to capture health workers and care-givers perceptions regarding the challenges faced in asthma diagnosis and possible solutions from the viewpoint of those experiencing these challenges.

Identification of the research questions

  1. (i)

    What challenges have been experienced in the diagnosis of asthma in children?

  2. (ii)

    What possible solutions have been suggested or implemented to curb the challenges in diagnosis of asthma in children?

Identification of the relevant studies

Study eligibility criteria

We used the ‘Participants, Concept and Context (PCC)’ criteria to clearly define eligible studies as described in the Joanna Briggs Manual for Evidence Synthesis 2021 [31].

Participant

Included in this review are studies that reported on the challenges faced in the diagnosis of asthma in children from the standpoint of the researchers, children, caregivers, health-workers, and any other stakeholders involved with asthma diagnosis and management. For this review, according to the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) children are defined as persons under the age of 18 years, while healthcare workers are defined as people whose job is to protect and improve the health of their communities.

Concept

Studies that reported on the challenges faced in the medical diagnosis of asthma in children and/or reported, suggested, or explored strategies that maybe used to overcome these challenges were assessed for inclusion. Challenge as a noun is used synonymously with barrier, problem or setback [32] and for purposes of this review meant any factor that impedes asthma diagnosis.

Context

The past decade has seen major changes in the understanding of the immune-pathogenesis and diagnosis of asthma. To capture this, studies from 2010 to 2021, written in English or already found to be translated to English by their own authors or publishers, which answered the study questions were assessed for inclusion. Included are peer reviewed articles with the focus of the paper being on ‘asthma in children in Nigeria, South Africa or Uganda,’ ‘challenges in asthma diagnosis’ or ‘solutions to challenges in asthma diagnosis. Historically SSA countries have suffered from the effects of poverty, struggling economies and poor health delivery in comparison to countries to the north of the Sahara. Asthma and other non-communicable diseases have particularly been neglected with healthcare efforts biased towards infectious diseases hence the focus on countries in SSA. Prior to narrowing the scoping review to these 3 countries, a preliminary search was done on asthma in children in Sub Saharan Africa. The initial search was broad, the results showed that research on childhood asthma is dominated by authors from mainly three countries: Nigeria, South Africa and Uganda. In addition, it became clearer that a closer review and analysis of data published from these 3 countries, would allow a more focused view of the relevant local factors applicable to the individual countries.

Study exclusion criteria

Studies that were not available in English, books, conference abstracts, expert papers, editorials and grey literature were excluded from this review.

Study type

Primary quantitative and qualitative studies and reviews that met the eligibility criteria were included.

Search strategy

For each of the two objectives, electronic databases PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE and Scopus were searched. A systematic search strategy was developed with the help of the college librarian (MM) using a combination of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH terms) and controlled vocabulary to identify peer reviewed articles answering the research objectives.

Objective 1 (Search 1) Challenges in the diagnosis of asthma in children

MeSH terms: ‘asthma’, ‘diagnosis’, ‘underdiagnosis’, ‘children’, ‘paediatric’, ‘Nigeria’, ‘South Africa’, ‘Uganda’, using AND/OR in the search builder.

Objective 2 (Search 2) Solutions to challenges in asthma diagnosis in children

MeSH terms: ‘improving asthma diagnosis’, ‘solutions to challenges in asthma diagnosis’ ‘underdiagnosis’ ‘children’, ‘paediatric’, ‘Nigeria’, ‘South Africa’, ‘Uganda’ ‘challenges’, using AND/OR in the search builder.

These MeSH terms generated under the two objectives were used to develop two separate search strings which were used to search PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE and Scopus.

Table 1 below summarises the eligibility criteria.

Table 1 Eligibility criteria

Study selection process

Two reviewers PM and FZG conducted the database search. They screened the results against the eligibility criteria. The studies selected for inclusion by title then had their abstracts retrieved and assessed against the eligibility criteria, for eligible abstracts, the full articles were analysed against the eligibility criteria.

Data extraction and charting onto a predefined data charting form

Relevant data was extracted and charted from the included studies. The Preview, Question, Read and Summarize (PQRS) system was used on all the studies included. From each of the included studies the author, country, study type, findings and full reference, were captured onto a pre-defined data extraction chart (Additional file 2). The studies that met the inclusion criteria were grouped under the subheadings: “challenges in asthma diagnosis” and “solutions to improve asthma diagnosis”. Two independent members of the review team (ENS, SR) assessed the studies that were included. Disagreements among reviewers on whether an article was suitable for inclusion were resolved by these two independent members of the review team (ENS, SR).

Collating, summarising, and reporting the results into tables and charts

The key findings were collated, summarised and reported in tables and charts. For the studies included for the review; relationships between studies were explored. The PRISMA flow diagram was used to summarise the number of records identified, included and excluded and the reasons for exclusion. (Additional file 3).

Data analysis

For quantitative data descriptive statistics were used. The findings were sorted into broad themes. This enabled identification, analysis and interpretation the findings from the articles according to key themes or patterns. For the one study with qualitative data, content analysis was done.

Data presentation

A narrative report was used to summarise the findings to meet the objectives of the scoping review.

Results

Study characteristics

The initial search using the search strategy for Objective 1: Challenges in the diagnosis of asthma in children (Search 1) gave a total of 168 while Objective 2/Solutions to challenges in the diagnosis of asthma in children (Search 2) yielded a total of 122. After applying the eligibility criteria to titles and abstracts, 59 full articles for Objective 1 and 34 full articles for Objectives 2 were retrieved and analysed. Of these 25 articles meeting the eligibility criteria were retained. References in each of the identified papers were screened and 3 additional articles met the eligibility criteria to make a total of 28. The PRISMA Flow Chart (Additional file 3) illustrates the study selection process.

Most of the studies included utilized quantitative methods mostly cross-sectional.

Table 2 summarizes the study characteristics of the included studies.

Table 2 Retained study by country N = 28

For both objectives, the included studies utilized mostly quantitative methods, only one study utilized qualitative methods. Additional file 3 summarizes the study distribution by author, country, study type and findings of the retained studies.

Challenges in the diagnosis of asthma in children

Figure 1 depicts the reasons for the under-diagnosis of asthma in children that have been put forward by various authors.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Factors leading to underdiagnosis of asthma

(i) Individual related factors

Lack of awareness of asthma symptoms

Lack of awareness of symptoms of asthma by the children and caregivers has been cited as one of the reasons for possible underdiagnosis of asthma [8, 20]. In Nigeria there were misconceptions and low levels of knowledge about asthma among parents of asthmatic children. Only 27.5% of the caregivers of asthmatic children knew that cough, wheeze and shortness of breath were the main symptoms of asthma [33].

(ii) Community related factors

Lack of asthma related terminology in local languages

Two reviews done on South African studies, showed that asthma related terminology including ‘asthma’ and ‘wheeze’ are absent in some local, ethnic languages [19, 20].

Stigma associated with asthma

A qualitative study in Uganda by van Gemert et al. revealed that while respiratory symptoms were common in children as well as adults, there was stigma associated with the presence of respiratory symptoms leading to caregivers not reporting symptoms [34]. In addition, the presence of respiratory symptoms was associated with tuberculosis hence act as an impediment to asthma diagnosis.

(iii) Health systems related factors

Poverty and inaccessibility to health care

In several studies, poor socio-economic status and/or lack of medical health funding was associated with under-recognition of asthma hence severe asthma [8, 19].

Inaccessibility to health facilities has been cited by Oluwole et al. as one of the reasons for possible underdiagnosis of asthma [18]. A review of studies done in South Africa on childhood asthma by Zar et al. highlighted inaccessibility to health care as an impediment to asthma diagnosis [19].

Strained health systems and lack of diagnostic resources

Health systems with strained resources have been cited by some authors as the cause for under-diagnosis of asthma [19].

While lung function testing eg spirometry remains an objective measure in diagnosis and assessing the severity of airflow obstruction, it remains widely unavailable [18, 35,36,37]. Spirometry, skin prick allergy testing and serum specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) for allergy testing are not available in most primary care, district and provincial hospitals where the asthmatic patient initially presents. The availability of spirometry was reported to be as low as 29.4% in Nigeria while availability of the less reliable peak flow meter which may be used in diagnosis and monitoring was reported to be 38% [38]. A study done by Desalu et al. in Nigeria showed that while 60.7% knew of the role of spirometry in diagnosis, only 25.2% reported having a spirometer in their hospital [39]. Another study in Uganda also revealed non availability of diagnostic tests [40].

Ayuk et al. reviewed literature on the use of spirometry particularly in resource poor countries and highlighted that unavailability of spirometers, ignorance of their importance in diagnosis and follow-up as well as lack of knowledge on how to use them and interpret results are the main reasons why spirometer use is low [35].

A systematic review done by Kibirige et al. on ‘Availability and Affordability of diagnostic tests for asthma and COPD’, availability of spirometry was low ranging from 13 to 53% in most countries in Sub Saharan Africa [41].

A review of records over two and half years at University of Nigeria teaching hospital spirometry laboratory showed that referral of patients from primary care health workers is poor and only patients above 15 years of age were documented to have been referred for spirometry [42]. In addition there is lack of respiratory physicians in most tertiary hospitals [43].

Low levels of knowledge on asthma diagnosis amongst health care workers

There is low levels of knowledge among health personnel on the utility of spirometry in the diagnostic evaluation of asthmatic children [35, 36]. In a study done in Nigeria, it was shown that while up to 95% of paediatric registrars knew and had seen a spirometer before and knew about its role in asthma diagnosis only 37% used it in diagnosis [37]. A survey among 131 health workers in 6 centres in Nigeria revealed that 116 (88.5%) had low knowledge levels on asthma diagnosis [44].

(iv) Factors related to diagnostic guidelines

Lack of or non-adherence to guidelines for asthma diagnosis

Most countries in SSA either do not have guidelines and in countries where they are available, they are not fully implemented especially in rural areas [19, 37]. Ayuk et al. showed that the use of guidelines is poor amongst paediatric residents from 23 university teaching hospitals in Nigeria with only 59.1% of them adhering to GINA guidelines [45]. The most reported reason for non-adherence to guideline based asthma diagnosis was the lack of knowledge of contents of the guideline and the importance of their role in diagnosis.

Mis-diagnosis of asthma due to inherent asthma heterogeneity, co-morbid conditions and alternate diagnosis

In LMIC, where the burden of infectious diseases over-ride non-communicable diseases, health workers tend to prioritize, even over-diagnose these infectious diseases at the expense of asthma. Two such conditions that tend to be over-diagnosed at the expense of asthma are bronchiolitis and pneumonia [46]. Pneumonia which mimics asthma especially if fever is not considered has been shown to lead to underdiagnosis of asthma in Ugandan children [22]. The different phenotypic presentations of the wheezing child below 5 years has led to diagnostic terms such as ‘the asthma syndrome’ being used in the Ugandan study.

Solutions to the challenges in diagnosis of asthma in children

Figure 2 summarises solutions to challenges in the diagnosis of asthma in children after synthesis of the evidence from literature.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The four prongs of improving asthma diagnosis

Several authors have recommended strategies to improve asthma diagnosis based on evidence. Table 3 summarises evidence for solutions to challenges in the diagnosis of asthma in children.

Table 3 Solutions to the challenges in the diagnosis of asthma in children

Discussion

Globally, the shift in asthma care is towards precision medicine, with phenotyping and endotyping of asthmatic patients guiding patient tailored biologic therapy. However, SSA is lagging behind these innovations. SSA is known to have suffered the effects of poverty, struggling economies and poor health delivery systems. Despite the rising burden of childhood asthma in SSA and the associated morbidity and mortality, research on asthma in SSA is dominated by South Africa, Nigeria and Uganda. By reviewing data from these three countries, this review has summarised the challenges faced in diagnosis of asthma and the solutions thereof.

Challenges in asthma diagnosis

A review of asthma in developing countries revealed some challenges similar to those reported in this review [56]. Poverty and inaccessibility to healthcare have been reported as factors leading to the underdiagnosis of asthma [57]. Lack of appropriate terms for asthma in local languages have been described as a deterrent to asthma diagnosis and care in an earlier review of Asthma in Africa done by Wjst [13]. Most of the studies that reported of lack of knowledge on asthma and poor perception of symptoms by both patients and caregivers suggested community based awareness programmes targeting schools [58].

Unavailability of diagnostic tests and poor knowledge levels on asthma diagnosis has been cited in adult studies a major factor in asthma underdiagnosis [59, 60]. A qualitative study in rural Asia reported that of the 22 primary healthcare professional interviewed, none had made a diagnosis of asthma in children less than 5 years of age preferring instead infectious causes [61].

Solutions to challenges in diagnosis of childhood asthma

Communities need to adopt the worldwide charter for all children with asthma which summarise how communities and government should improve asthma diagnosis and care [62]. Because some local languages lack the terminology for wheeze, video based questionnaires may improve the sensitivity of screening for asthma [4]. Targeted education programmes on the symptoms, diagnosis, and management of asthma improves the level of knowledge among communities. This proved to be effective in a study done by Rastogi et al. evaluating the effect of educational programmes among 268 Hispanic and African American primary caregivers of asthmatic children that had repeated emergency department visits [63]. Similar improvement in knowledge levels was found among caregivers in India [64]. Symptom-based and spirometry based screening programmes have been tested in school aged children in high income countries and found to be feasible [65].

Ait Khaled et al. and Martins et al. in systematic reviews highlighted several areas meant to improve asthma care [4, 60]. These were equipment capacitation of hospitals, implementation of guidelines, policies aimed at reduction of tobacco use and provision of generic inhaled corticosteroids. The asthmatic child is most likely to present first to a primary health centre therefore strengthening and equipping these facilities to enhance asthma diagnosis and management is important for successful outcomes. The primary health care model for non-communicable disease was validated in the 2 year prospective interventional studies in South Africa [66]. In addition nurse-led primary health care for non-communicable diseases has proved to be effective in improving asthma diagnosis and care in Cameroon [67]. Recommendations by the South African Childhood Asthma Working Group (SACAWG) suggested that training health workers will improve diagnosis of childhood asthma [68].

Given that 60–80% of asthmatics present within the first 5 years of life [23] and spirometry is widely unavailable in LMIC, symptom based diagnosis becomes a reasonable option provided alternative diagnoses are looked for and excluded. In addition, efforts should be made to avail spirometry or peak flow meter in all facilities caring for children.

Study limitations

While the authors initially set out to review studies in SSA, it became clear that there is paucity of research on asthma in children in most SSA countries, with most studies being from Nigeria, South Africa and Uganda. It is in this regard therefore that while this scoping review has come up with useful recommendations to improve asthma diagnosis in children, it should be appreciated that these findings from these 3 countries in SSA.

Conclusions

Asthma is a major cause of child morbidity and mortality and its prevalence is rising in SSA. Early asthma diagnosis and follow-up care allow alveoli and airway health, improve lung function, and prevent the risk of COAD. Asthma diagnosis remains a challenge in SSA countries mainly due to community stigma and lack of knowledge, inaccessibility to health care, strained health systems and lack of guidelines or non-implementation of these guidelines. A comprehensive 4-pronged approach to improve asthma diagnosis will include community and school based education programmes on asthma, revision of asthma diagnostic terms, development and implementation of diagnostic guidelines and health systems strengthening. In addition there is need to improve availability and accessibility to asthma treatment.

Availability of data and materials

The raw data obtained from this scoping review is available from the authors on request.

Abbreviations

COAD:

Chronic obstructive airways disease

EIB:

Exercise induced bronchospasm

NAEPP/EPR:

National Asthma Education Prevention Programme/Expert Panel

NICE:

National Institute for Care Excellence

GINA:

Global Initiative for Asthma

HIV:

Human immune deficiency virus

ISAAC:

The International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood

JBI:

Joanna Briggs Institute’s

LMIC:

Low- and Middle-Income Countries

PRISMA:

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses

PQRS:

Preview, Question, Read, Summarize

SSA:

Sub Saharan Africa

TB:

Tuberculosis

UNICEF:

United Nations Children’s Fund

References

  1. Global asthma network. The global asthma report 2018. 2018. http://globalasthmareport.org/. Accessed 19 Apr 2021.

  2. Adeloye D, Chan KY, Rudan I, Campbell H. An estimate of asthma prevalence in Africa: a systematic analysis. Croat Med J. 2013;54(6):519–31.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Asher I, Pearce N. Global burden of asthma among children. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2014;18(11):1269–78.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aït-Khaled N, Enarson DA, Ottmani S, El Sony A, Eltigani M, Sepulveda R. Chronic airflow limitation in developing countries: burden and priorities. Int J Chronic Obstruct Pulm Dis. 2007;2(2):141–50.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baard CB, Franckling-Smith Z, Munro J, Workman L, Zar HJ. Asthma in South African adolescents: a time trend and risk factor analysis over two decades. ERJ Open Res. 2021;7(2):00576–2020.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Oyenuga V, Mosler G, Addo-Yobo E, Adeyeye OO, Masekela R, Mujuru HA, et al. Asthma symptom severity and diagnosis in adolescents in sub-Saharan Africa. In: Paediatric asthma and allergy. Sheffield: European Respiratory Society; 2021. p. OA2565.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Lai CKW, Beasley R, Crane J, Foliaki S, Shah J, Weiland S, et al. Global variation in the prevalence and severity of asthma symptoms: phase three of the international study of asthma and allergies in childhood (ISAAC). Thorax. 2009;64(6):476–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Oluwole O, Arinola GO, Huo D, Olopade CO. Household biomass fuel use, asthma symptoms severity, and asthma underdiagnosis in rural schoolchildren in Nigeria: a cross-sectional observational study. BMC Pulm Med. 2017;17(1):3.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Saglani S, Menzie-Gow AN. Approaches to asthma diagnosis in children and adults. Front Pediatr. 2019;17(7):148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. GINA-2020-report_20_06_04-1-wms.pdf. https://ginasthma.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/GINA-2020-report_20_06_04-1-wms.pdf. Accessed 19 Apr 2021.

  11. EPR-3_Asthma_Full_Report_2007.pdf. https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/sites/default/files/media/docs/EPR-3_Asthma_Full_Report_2007.pdf. Accessed 19 Apr 2021.

  12. Asthma: diagnosis, monitoring and chronic asthma management. https://www.nice.org.uk/. 2021;39.

  13. Wjst M, Boakye D. Asthma in Africa. PLoS Med. 2007;4(2): e72.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Musafiri S, Joos G, Van Meerbeeck JP. Asthma, atopy and COPD in sub-Saharan countries: the challenges. East Afr J Public Health. 2011;8(2):161–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. van Gemert F, van der Molen T, Jones R, Chavannes N. The impact of asthma and COPD in sub-Saharan Africa. Prim Care Respir J. 2011;20(3):240–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mphahlele REM, Masekela R. A historical overview of childhood asthma in southern Africa: are we there yet? Afr J Thorac Crit Care Med. 2021;24(4):163–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Aaron SD, Boulet LP, Reddel HK, Gershon AS. Underdiagnosis and overdiagnosis of asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;198(8):1012–20.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Oluwole O, Rennie DC, Senthilselvan A, Dyck R, Afanasieva A, Adamko DJ, et al. Asthma diagnosis among children along an urban-rural gradient. J Asthma. 2018;55(11):1242–52.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zar HJ, Levin ME. Challenges in treating pediatric asthma in developing countries. Pediatr Drugs. 2012;14(6):353–9.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Masekela R, Gray CL, Green RJ, Manjra AI, Kritzinger FE, Levin M, et al. The increasing burden of asthma in South African children: a call to action. S Afr Med J. 2018;108(7):537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Olaniyan T, Dalvie MA, Röösli M, Naidoo R, Künzli N, de Hoogh K, et al. Asthma-related outcomes associated with indoor air pollutants among schoolchildren from four informal settlements in two municipalities in the Western Cape Province of South Africa. Indoor Air. 2019;29(1):89–100.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nantanda R, Tumwine JK, Ndeezi G, Ostergaard MS. Asthma and pneumonia among children less than five years with acute respiratory symptoms in Mulago Hospital, Uganda: evidence of under-diagnosis of asthma. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(11): e81562.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Yunginger JW, Reed CE, O’Connell EJ, Melton LJ, O’Fallon WM, Silverstein MD. A community-based study of the epidemiology of asthma: incidence rates, 1964–1983. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992;146(4):888–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Trivedi M, Denton E. Asthma in children and adults—what are the differences and what can they tell us about asthma? Front Pediatr. 2019;25(7):256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hsu J, Qin X, Beavers SF, Mirabelli MC. Asthma-related school absenteeism, morbidity, and modifiable factors. Am J Prev Med. 2016;51(1):23–32.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Soril LJJ, Leggett LE, Lorenzetti DL, Noseworthy TW, Clement FM. Reducing frequent visits to the emergency department: a systematic review of interventions. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(4): e0123660.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tai A, Tran H, Roberts M, Clarke N, Wilson J, Robertson CF. The association between childhood asthma and adult chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax. 2014;69(9):805–10.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sears MR. Lung function decline in asthma. Eur Respir J. 2007;30(3):411–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. PRISMA. http://prisma-statement.org/prismastatement/flowdiagram.aspx. Accessed 19 Apr 2021.

  31. JBI_Critical_Appraisal-Checklist_for_Qualitative_Research2017_0.pdf. https://jbi.global/sites/default/files/2019-05/JBI_Critical_Appraisal-Checklist_for_Qualitative_Research2017_0.pdf. Accessed 19 Apr 2021.

  32. Challenge | definition of challenge by Merriam-Webster. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/challenge. Accessed 18 May 2021.

  33. Amorha KC, Ayogu EE, Ngwoke BA, Okonta EO. Knowledge, attitudes and quality of life of caregivers towards asthma in their children: a Nigerian perspective. J Health Sci. 2020;10(1):47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  34. van Gemert F, Chavannes N, Nabadda N, Luzige S, Kirenga B, Eggermont C, et al. Impact of chronic respiratory symptoms in a rural area of sub-Saharan Africa: an in-depth qualitative study in the Masindi district of Uganda. Prim Care Respir J. 2013;22(3):300–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ayuk AC, Uwaezuoke SN, Ndukwu CI, Ndu IK, Iloh KK, Okoli CV. Spirometry in asthma care: a review of the trends and challenges in pediatric practice. Clin Med Insights Pediatr. 2017;1(11):117955651772067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ozoh OB, Ndukwu CI, Desalu OO, Adeyeye OO, Adeniyi B. Knowledge and practice assessment, and self reported barriers to guideline based asthma management among doctors in Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2019;22(5):692–700.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Chima EI, Iroezindu MO, Uchenna NR, Mbata GO, Okwuonu CG. A survey of asthma management practices and implementation of Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines among doctors in a resource-limited setting in Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2017;20(8):984–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Desalu OO, Onyedum CC, Iseh KR, Salawu FK, Salami AK. Asthma in Nigeria: are the facilities and resources available to support internationally endorsed standards of care? Health Policy. 2011;99(3):250–4.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Desalu OO, Busari OA, Onyedum CC, Salawu FK, Obateru OA, Nwogu KC, et al. Evaluation of current knowledge, awareness and practice of spirometry among hospital-based Nigerian doctors. BMC Pulm Med. 2009;9(1):50.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kibirige D, Kampiire L, Atuhe D, Mwebaze R, Katagira W, Muttamba W, et al. Access to affordable medicines and diagnostic tests for asthma and COPD in sub Saharan Africa: the Ugandan perspective. BMC Pulm Med. 2017;17(1):179.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kibirige D, Sanya RE, Nantanda R, Worodria W, Kirenga B. Availability and affordability of medicines and diagnostic tests recommended for management of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2019;15:14.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Nwosu NI, Chukwuka CJ, Onyedum CC, Odilinye HC, Nlewedim PI, Ayuk AC. Current pattern of spirometry utilisation in a sub-Saharan African country. Afr J Respir Med. 2016;12(1):6.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Obaseki D, Adeniyi B, Kolawole T, Onyedum C, Erhabor G. Gaps in capacity for respiratory care in developing countries. Nigeria as a case study. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015;12(4):591–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Osaretin OW, Uchechukwu ND, Osawaru O. Asthma management by medical practitioners: the situation in a developing country. World J Pediatr. 2013;9(1):64–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Ayuk AC, Ubesie A, Odimegwu CL, Iloh K. Use of global initiative for asthma (GINA) guidelines in asthma management among paediatric residents in a sub Saharan African country: a cross-sectional descriptive study. Pan Afr Med J. 2017;27:120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Nantanda R, Ostergaard MS, Ndeezi G, Tumwine JK. Factors associated with asthma among under-fives in Mulago hospital, Kampala Uganda: a cross sectional study. BMC Pediatr. 2013;13(1):141.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Temitayo IO, Adegbenro CA, Awopeju OF, Olatona FA. Knowledge and perceptions of asthma in a Nigerian high school. TEXILA Int J Public Health. 2017;5(4):598–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Kuti B, Kuti D, Omole K, Mohammed L, Ologun B, Oso B. Prevalence and factors associated with exercise-induced bronchospasm among rural school children in Ilesa, Nigeria. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2017;24(2):107.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Østergaard MS, Nantanda R, Tumwine JK, Aabenhus R. Childhood asthma in low income countries: an invisible killer? Prim Care Respir J. 2012;21(2):214–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. du Plessis JM, Gerber JJ, Brand L. Managing asthma in primary care through imperative outcomes: managing asthma in primary care. J Eval Clin Pract. 2013;19(2):235–42.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. van Niekerk A, White DA, Goussard P, Risenga SM. Childhood asthma: a best-practice strategy for diagnosis and assessment of control in South Africa. S Afr Med J. 2021;111(8):705–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Nantanda R, Siersma V, Ndeezi G, Tumwine JK, Østergaard MS. Symptom-based screening tool for asthma syndrome among young children in Uganda. Npj Prim Care Respir Med. 2020;30(1):18.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Murdoch J, Curran R, Cornick R, Picken S, Bachmann M, Bateman E, et al. Addressing the quality and scope of paediatric primary care in South Africa: evaluating contextual impacts of the introduction of the Practical Approach to Care Kit for children (PACK Child). BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):479.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Adeyeye OO, Bamisile RT, Bolarinwa FF, Onadeko B. Five-year audit of spirometry at the LASUTH, Ikeja, south-west Nigeria. Afr J Respir Med. 2012;18(1).

  55. Masekela R, Risenga SM, Kitchin OP, White DA, Davis G, Goussard P, et al. The diagnosis of asthma in children: an evidence-based approach to a common clinical dilemma. S Afr Med J. 2018;108(7):540–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Rosado-Pinto J, Morais-Almeida M. Asthma in developing worlds. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2004;37(S26):66–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Annesi-Maesano I, Sterlin C, Caillaud D, de Blay F, Lavaud F, Charpin D, et al. Factors related to under-diagnosis and under-treatment of childhood asthma in metropolitan France. Multidiscip Respir Med. 2012;7(1):24.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Panditi S. Perception of exercise induced asthma by children and their parents. Arch Dis Child. 2003;88(9):807–11.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Onyedum C, Ukwaja K, Desalu O, Ezeudo C. Challenges in the management of bronchial asthma among adults in Nigeria: a systematic review. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2013;3(3):324.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Martins P, Rosado-Pinto J, do Céu Teixeira M, Neuparth N, Silva O, Tavares H, et al. Under-report and underdiagnosis of chronic respiratory diseases in an African country. Allergy. 2009;64(7):1061–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Østergaard MS, Kjærgaard J, Kristensen MM, Reventlow S, Poulsen A, Isaeva E, Akylbekov A, Sooronbaev T. Asthma in children under 5 years in rural Kyrgyzstan: a diagnostic vacuum? A qualitative FRESH AIR study. EMJ Respir. 2019;7(1):97–108.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Szefler SJ, Fitzgerald DA, Adachi Y, Doull IJ, Fischer GB, Fletcher M, et al. A worldwide charter for all children with asthma. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2020;55(5):1282–92.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Rastogi D, Madhok N, Kipperman S. Caregiver asthma knowledge, aptitude, and practice in high healthcare utilizing children: effect of an educational intervention. Pediatr Allergy Immunol Pulmonol. 2013;26(3):128–39.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Divecha CA, Tullu MS, Jadhav DU. Parental knowledge and attitudes regarding asthma in their children: impact of an educational intervention in an Indian population. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2020;55(3):607–15.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Abramson JM, Wollan P, Kurland M, Yawn BP. Feasibility of school-based spirometry screening for asthma. J Sch Health. 2003;73(4):150–3.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Coleman R, Gill G, Wilkinson D. Noncommunicable disease management in resource-poor settings: a primary care model from rural South Africa. Bull World Health Organ. 1998;76(6):633–40.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Kengne AP, Sobngwi E, Fezeu LL, Awah PK, Dongmo S, Mbanya JC, et al. Nurse-led care for asthma at primary level in rural sub-Saharan Africa: the experience of Bafut in Cameroon. J Asthma. 2008;45(6):437–43.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Motala C, Kling S, Gie R, Potter PC, Manjra A, Vermeulen J, Weinberg EG, Green R. Guideline for the management of chronic asthma in children—2000 update. Allergy Society of South Africa Working Group. S Afr Med J. 2000;90(5 Pt 2):524–8, 530, 532.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the College of Health Sciences librarians: Mr. Muziringa and Mr. Ndlovu for their contribution towards the database search strategy as well as referencing.

Funding

This study was funded by TIBA which is also supporting PM for her fieldwork on ‘Towards improving asthma diagnosis in children.’ PM is a TIBA fellow.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

PM and FZG conceived the idea. PM drafted the protocol. Improvements to the protocol were done by FZG, SR and ENS. PM wrote the first draft of the manuscript and all authors (FZG, SR and ENS) made revisions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Magwenzi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

PRISMA 2020 checklist.

Additional file 2.

Data extraction form.

Additional file 3.

PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for new systematic reviews which included searches of databases and registers only.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Magwenzi, P., Rusakaniko, S., Sibanda, E.N. et al. Challenges in the diagnosis of asthma in children, what are the solutions? A scoping review of 3 countries in sub Saharan Africa. Respir Res 23, 254 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-022-02170-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-022-02170-y

Keywords

  • Childhood asthma
  • Diagnosis
  • Under-diagnosis Nigeria
  • South Africa
  • Uganda
  • Strategies
  • Improving asthma diagnosis