Skip to main content
Download PDF

Risk factors associated with radiolucent foreign body inhalation in adults: a 10-year retrospective cohort study

Respiratory Research volume 23, Article number: 238 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Foreign body aspiration (FBA) is a serious condition with high morbidity and mortality rates. Although chest radiography is generally the first radiologic modality used in diagnosis, a substantial percentage of foreign bodies are radiolucent in adults with diagnosis challenging.

Methods

Retrospective review of adult patients with FBA diagnosed by flexible electronic bronchoscopy from 2012 to 2022 collecting demographics, history, hospital presentation, radiographic, and operative details. Risk factors associated with radiolucent foreign body inhalation in adults were explored using appropriate statistical methods.

Results

Between 1 January 2012 and 1 January 2022, 114 adult patients diagnosed with FBA were enrolled. The median age of participants was 65 years (IQR 52–74). Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) examinations identified 28 cases (25%) showing direct visualization of the foreign body (defined as the radiopaque group) and 86 cases (75%) in the radiolucent group. Multivariable stepwise linear regression analysis showed increased odds of radiolucent foreign body inhalation in adults associated with pneumonic patches in MDCT (OR 6.99; 95% CI 1.80–27.22; P = 0.005) and plants/meat foreign bodies (OR 6.17; 95% CI 1.12–33.96; P = 0.04). A witnessed choking history (OR 0.02; 95% CI 0–0.14; P < 0.001) was a protective factor of radiolucent foreign body inhalation in adults.

Conclusions

Unlike radiopaque FBA, in those presenting with a suspected radiolucent foreign body aspiration, the diagnosis is far more challenging. Risk factors such as lacking a choking history, non-resolving pneumonia (pneumonic patches) in MDCT findings, and plants/meat foreign bodies may help in the early diagnosis of radiolucent foreign body inhalation in adults. Further prospective multicenter studies should be conducted to validate the findings.

Background

Foreign body aspiration (FBA) is an uncommon but potentially life-threatening event [1, 2]. Symptoms typically consist of a choking event followed by cough and dyspnea [3, 4]. Although both adults and children tend to inhale foreign bodies, it is more common in children than in adults [4]. Several observational studies report a low rate of FBA in adults (0.66 per 100,000) [5,6,7]. However, the presentations in adults are inconsistent and symptoms may mimic more chronic lung diseases such as asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [6, 8,9,10]. In addition, many cases of FBA in adults lack a history of choking and are often with no direct signs of airway foreign body in chest radiographs [4, 11].

The initial clues for FBA in adults are usually obscure or indirect [11, 12]. Reports have indicated that only 25–38% of adult patients who are found to have a lower airway foreign body remember a choking event [13, 14]. This is supported by a systematic literature review showing that often a history of aspiration is lacking in adults with FBA [15]. Although chest radiography is the primary imaging modality used to identify a foreign body in the lower airway, a study from Sehgal and colleagues showed that only 24.6% of foreign body inhalation in the adult population has the radiological manifestations of foreign body aspiration and direct visualization of the foreign body in the case of radiopaque foreign bodies [5]. Unlike radiopaque FBA, in those presenting with a suspected radiolucent foreign body aspiration, the diagnosis is far more challenging [16,17,18]. When a diagnosis is not established immediately, retained foreign bodies may lead to recurrent pneumonia, recurrent hemoptysis, bronchiectasis, or other complications [5].

In this study, we aimed to analyze retrospectively to determine risk factors that help in the early diagnosis of radiolucent foreign body inhalation in adults.

Study design and methods

Participants

All methods were carried out following relevant guidelines and regulations. With approval from the Ethics Committee of the Central Hospital of Wuhan, Hubei, China (Approval No.: WHZXKYL2022-052), a retrospective review was conducted at the Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine in the Central Hospital of Wuhan. All adult patients (age > 18 years) diagnosed with FBA from 1 January 2012 to 1 January 2022 were enrolled. They all underwent multi-detector Computed Tomography (MDCT) examinations followed by flexible bronchoscopy (details in Additional file 1: Methods).

Measures

Patient demographics, pre-hospital history, symptoms, radiographic presentations, operative details, bronchoscopic findings, and clinical course were collected from the medical records.

Patients underwent chest MDCT examinations in the supine position and with breath-holding following inspiration (GE Healthcare Optima) from the level of the thoracic inlet to the dome of the diaphragm. The CT examinations were performed with a rotation time of 0.6 s, a pitch ratio of 1.75, tube voltage of 120 kV, tube current adjust automatically, and a slice thickness of 1.25 mm for a whole chest scan. MDCT images were reconstructed with a 1.25-mm slice thickness on the workstation (GE ADW 2.0). These reconstructed axial images were processed. On the 3D page, the reconstructed multiplanar reformation (MPR) images were evaluated in the axial, sagittal, and coronal planes. MDCT examinations showing direct visualization of the foreign body are defined as radiopaque cases, while radiolucent cases are those foreign bodies that failed to be identified by 2 experienced radiologists. They reviewed the images independently in a consistent manner, with a conclusion reached by consensus when there was a discrepancy.

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables were expressed as n (%) and compared by χ2 test or Fisher's exact test if appropriate. Continuous variables were expressed as median (IQR, interquartile range), and compared using a two-sample t-test, Welch's two-sample t-test, or Mann–Whitney U test, if appropriate. Normality of distribution was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Because of the sample size, measurable variables with significant differences between groups were considered in subsequent univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses [19,20,21,22,23,24]. A multivariable binary logistic regression analysis (backward stepwise method) was performed to identify the independent risk factors associated with radiolucent foreign body inhalation in adults. Cut off point was determined by the receiver operating characteristic curve. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All data analyses and graphs were done in R (version 4.1.3).

Results

Patient characteristics

As shown in Table 1, between 1 January 2012 and 1 January 2022, 114 adult patients diagnosed with FBA were enrolled, of whom 71 were male (62%) and 43 females (38%), with a median age of 65 years (IQR 52 ~ 74). A witnessed choking history was observed in 19 (17%) patients. 49 cases (43%) were with a length of disease course of more than 60 days. 12 patients (11%) had been admitted to ICU, mainly due to airway obstruction, respiratory failure, and multiple organ dysfunction. 64 cases (56%) had been misdiagnosed as pneumonia and 5 cases (4%) as lung cancer.

Table 1 Patient characteristics
Full size table

80 patients (70%) had complications with 59 patients (52%) had a variety of chronic diseases requiring daily medication, including hypertension, coronary disease, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. 30 patients (26%) suffered chronic respiratory diseases presenting cough, expectoration, and dyspnea. 18 patients (16%) had post-stroke dysphagia, 3 patients (3%) with Alzheimer's disease, 2 patients (2%) with a history of throat surgery, and 1 patient with FBA during the dental operation.

For symptoms, coughing was the most common presentation of FBA (103 cases, 90%). Other presentations included purulent sputum (84 cases, 74%), chest tightness (49 cases, 43%), and hemoptysis (25 cases, 22%). In addition, a few patients presented symptoms as fever (9 cases, 8%), dyspnea (6 cases, 5%), chest pain (5 cases, 4%), and disturbance of consciousness (1 case, 1%). Physical examinations identified 24 cases (21%) presenting rales and 6 cases (5%) wheezing.

Comparisons in adult patients with radiolucent versus radiopaque FBA were done. A higher proportion of patients without a witnessed choking history was observed in radiolucent FBA cases when compared with those with radiopaque FBA (93% vs. 39%; P < 0.001). Patients diagnosed with radiolucent FBA also had a longer disease course (median 60 days, IQR 14–150; P < 0.001), with 44 cases (51%) having a length of disease course of more than 60 days (P = 0.004). 12 (14%) patients diagnosed with radiolucent FBA had been admitted to ICU, while no case was for those with radiopaque FBA (P = 0.04). 57 (66%) patients diagnosed with radiolucent FBA had been misdiagnosed as pneumonia compared to 7 (25%) for those with radiopaque FBA (P < 0.001). Details are summarized in Table 1.

Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) presentations

All patients (n = 114) underwent MDCT examinations followed by flexible bronchoscopy, with 28 cases (25%) showing direct visualization of the foreign body (defined as the radiopaque group, Fig. 1A) and 86 cases (75%) in the radiolucent group (Fig. 1B). In addition to the visualization of the foreign body, MDCT presentations for FBA included non-resolving pneumonia (pneumonic patch) in 80 cases (70%), airway stenosis in 18 cases (16%), atelectasis in 16 cases (14%), bronchiectasis in 15 cases (13%), thickening of the bronchial wall in 14 cases (12%), unilateral pleural effusion in 14 cases (12%), and consolidation in 13 cases (11%) (Table 2).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Representative radiographic presentations and bronchoscopic findings from foreign body aspiration cases. A A 68-year male patient inhaled a metal nail (red arrows) during dental implantation located at the LB8 in the radiopaque group. B A 78-year male patient inhaled a fish bone (red arrows) located at the RB2 in the radiolucent group. In B, the position of the fish bone was indicated retrospectively after a flexible bronchoscopy examination

Full size image
Table 2 Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) presentations
Full size table

When comparing adult patients with radiolucent versus radiopaque FBA, we noticed that a higher proportion of patients with radiolucent FBA showed non-resolving pneumonia (pneumonic patch) (81% vs. 36%; P < 0.001), thickening of the bronchial wall (16% vs. 0%; P = 0.02) and consolidation (15% vs. 0%; P = 0.04) (Table 2).

Flexible bronchoscopy findings

In total, 112 cases (98%) of the foreign bodies were successfully removed by flexible bronchoscopy with 85 cases (75%) achieved by a single operation and 29 cases (25%) needing more than 2 operations. 85 cases (75%) were operated on under local anesthesia and 29 cases (25%) under general anesthesia. Granulomas under bronchoscopy were observed in 50 cases (44%) and ulcers in 9 cases (8%). 85 cases (75%) required a single surgical tool to remove foreign bodies while 29 cases (25%) with more than 2 different types of tools. During operations, 20 cases (18%) presented active bleeding. For operation time, 79 cases (69%) were finished within 30 min and 35 cases (31%) above 30 min. Interestingly, adult patients with radiolucent FBA seemed to require a fewer number of operations (P = 0.03) (Table 3).

Table 3 Summary of flexible bronchoscopy
Full size table

The foreign bodies successfully removed were mostly located in the right main bronchus (34 cases, 30%) and right lower lobe bronchus (25 cases, 22%). Other locations included the left lower lobe bronchus (12 cases, 11%), right middle lobe bronchus (10 cases, 9%), left upper lobe bronchus (7 cases, 6%), left main bronchus (6 cases, 5%), right upper lobe bronchus (5 cases, 4%), glottis (3 cases, 3%), and trachea (windpipe) (2 cases, 2%). Foreign bodies in 10 cases (9%) had multiple locations (Fig. 2A).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Sites of foreign bodies. Diagrams showing sites of foreign bodies in all cases (A, n = 114), the radiolucent group (B, n = 86), and the radiopaque group (C, n = 28). Numbers in circles are case numbers and the darkness of color represents the frequency

Full size image

A variety of foreign bodies were detected, including 58 cases (51%) of bones (chicken bone, fish bone, crayfish shell), 34 cases (30%) of plants/meat (vegetable, beans, nuts, food scrap mixed with rice, vegetable, and meat), medicine pills (2 cases, 2%), metal (2 cases, 2%), plastic films (2 cases, 2%), and dentures (2 cases, 2%). 11 subjects (10%) were not identifiable (Table 4). We then classified metal, plastic films, and dentures as inorganics, while bones, medicine pills, and plants/meat as organics. In this cohort, 97 cases (85%) were organic foreign bodies (Additional file 1: Table S1).

Table 4 Bronchoscopy findings
Full size table

When comparing adult patients with radiolucent versus radiopaque FBA, we noticed the differences in the site (P = 0.005) and type of foreign bodies (P = 0.03) (Table 4). The top 2 locations for radiolucent foreign bodies were the right lower lobe bronchus (22 cases, 26%) and right main bronchus (19 cases, 22%) (Fig. 2B), while the majority of radiopaque foreign bodies located at the right main bronchus (15 cases, 53%) (Fig. 2C). Regarding the type of foreign bodies, radiolucent foreign bodies were mainly bones (38 cases, 44%) and plants/meat (31 cases, 36%) (Table 4).

Risk factors associated with radiolucent foreign body inhalation in adults

To explore the risk factors associated with radiolucent foreign body inhalation in adults, univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were used. In univariate analysis, without a witnessed choking history, a longer disease course, MDCT showing pneumonic patches, located at the right lower lobe bronchus, and plants/meat foreign bodies were associated with radiolucent foreign body inhalation in adults (all P < 0.05; Additional file 1: Table S2).

We then identified MDCT showing pneumonic patches (OR 6.99; 95% CI 1.80–27.22; P = 0.005) and plants/meat foreign bodies (OR 6.17; 95% CI 1.12–33.96; P = 0.04) as independent risk factors of radiolucent foreign body inhalation in adults in the multivariable analysis (Table 5; Additional file 1: Table S3). A witnessed choking history (OR 0.02; 95% CI 0–0.14; P < 0.001) was a protective factor of radiolucent foreign body inhalation in adults in this multivariable analysis (Table 5; Additional file 1: Table S3).

Table 5 Multivariable stepwise linear regression analysis for risk factors associated with radiolucent FBA in adults
Full size table

Discussion

FBA may present a life-threatening emergency, which requires early diagnosis and urgent removal of foreign bodies by bronchoscopy to avoid complications [9, 12, 25, 26]. However, the presentations and symptoms of FBA in adults are inconsistent and diverse [6, 8,9,10]. In this retrospective study, with coughing as the most common presentation as expected, other presentations, such as purulent sputum, chest tightness, hemoptysis, and dyspnea, were also recorded. Occasionally, several patients presented symptoms such as fever, chest pain, and disturbance of consciousness.

In addition, foreign body inhalation in adults is often with no direct signs of airway foreign body in chest radiographs [12, 27]. In our cohort, all adult patients underwent MDCT examinations followed by flexible bronchoscopy. There were 75% of patients without direct visualization of the foreign bodies (radiolucent). Within this group, a majority of patients (93%) denied a witnessed choking history. All these factors resulted in a challenging/delayed diagnosis in adults with radiolucent foreign body inhalation. This led to a higher proportion of patients with misdiagnosis, a longer disease course, and being admitted to ICU. These findings were also reflected by the MDCT examinations showing that in the radiolucent group, patients often manifested non-resolving pneumonia (pneumonic patches), thickening of the bronchial wall, and consolidation, indicating recurrent airway inflammation. Taken together, identifying risk factors (predictors) that help in the early diagnosis of radiolucent foreign body inhalation in adults is urgently demanded.

A previous study by Boyd and colleagues suggested that risk factors of FBA in adults include loss of consciousness, age-related slowing in the swallowing mechanism, use of medications (those impair the ability to cough and swallow), post-stroke dysphagia, and numerous neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's or Parkinson's disease [27]. When comparing adult patients with radiolucent versus radiopaque FBA, no differences were found among the aforementioned risk factors.

To explore the risk factors associated with radiolucent foreign body inhalation in adults, robust and appropriate statistical methods were adopted. We identified MDCT showing pneumonic patches and plants/meat foreign bodies as independent risk factors of radiolucent foreign body inhalation in adults, and a witnessed choking history as a protective factor. This is consistence with earlier discussions indicating that a majority of radiolucent FBA cases in adults show evidence of recurrent airway inflammation as well as lacking a choking event.

Studies showed that the nature of the inhaled foreign bodies is highly variable ranging from organic to inorganic materials in adults [25, 28, 29]. The type of food aspirated varies with local traditions and/or ethnic background [30, 31]. Our study showed that 85% of foreign bodies were organic, including plants/meat and bones from different food. Although chest MDCT is more sensitive to detect radiopaque foreign bodies than X-rays [32], many organic foreign bodies, such as bones and plants/meat are radiolucent under MDCT [33,34,35,36]. A study suggested that a plant foreign body is a risk factor for lower respiratory tract infection in children [33]. Some plants, such as nuts, can cause inflammation, granulation tissue formation, and airway stenosis; while beans, seeds, and sweetcorn seeds can absorb water, leading to swelling which causes partial obstruction to a complete obstruction [37]. Multiple medication pills can also cause severe airway inflammation and ulceration [38]. The reason for the false-negative MDCT findings under these conditions could be a consequence of local lung infections resulting in a failed visualization of the foreign body.

The most common site of aspiration in adults is the right bronchus, in particular the mainstem or divisions of the right lower lobe bronchus. This is because compared to the left bronchus, the right one is more vertical and with a slightly larger diameter [39, 40]. This is also true in our cohort, with a majority of foreign bodies located in the right main bronchus and right lower lobe bronchus. Interestingly, the top location for radiolucent foreign bodies is the right lower lobe bronchus compared to the right main bronchus as the top location for radiopaque foreign bodies.

This study has several limitations. As a bronchoscopy and endoscopy center in central China, referral bias can influence the results of this study. Additionally, the details for foreign bodies, such as sharpness, hardness, and stability, were not recorded, which may be associated with different levels of airway inflammation and consequently MDCT presentations. Lastly, interpretation of our findings might be limited by the sample size. Despite these limitations, to our knowledge, this is the largest retrospective study to date on the risk factors associated with radiolucent foreign body inhalation in adults.

Conclusion

Unlike radiopaque FBA, in those presenting with a suspected radiolucent foreign body aspiration, the diagnosis is far more challenging. This study identifies a few risk factors that have the potential to facilitate an early diagnosis of radiolucent foreign body inhalation in adults. Further prospective multicenter studies should be conducted to validate the findings.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from Xioafan Liu upon reasonable request and with permission of The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Hubei, China.

Abbreviations

FBA:

Foreign body aspiration

MDCT:

Multi-detector Computed Tomography

References

  1. Salih AM, Alfaki M, Alam-Elhuda DM. Airway foreign bodies: a critical review for a common pediatric emergency. World J Emerg Med. 2016;7(1):5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gregori D, Salerni L, Scarinzi C, et al. Foreign bodies in the upper airways causing complications and requiring hospitalization in children aged 0–14 years: results from the ESFBI study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;265(8):971–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Na’ara S, Vainer I, Amit M, Gordin A. Foreign body aspiration in infants and older children: a comparative study. Ear Nose Throat J. 2020;99(1):47–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ulas AB, Aydin Y, Eroglu A. Foreign body aspirations in children and adults. Am J Surg. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.05.032.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sehgal IS, Dhooria S, Ram B, et al. Foreign body inhalation in the adult population: experience of 25,998 bronchoscopies and systematic review of the literature. Respir Care. 2015;60(10):1438–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Baharloo F, Veyckemans F, Francis C, Biettlot MP, Rodenstein DO. Tracheobronchial foreign bodies: presentation and management in children and adults. Chest. 1999;115(5):1357–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hsu W, Sheen T, Lin C, Tan C, Yeh T, Lee S. Clinical experiences of removing foreign bodies in the airway and esophagus with a rigid endoscope: a series of 3217 cases from 1970 to 1996. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;122(3):450–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hewlett JC, Rickman OB, Lentz RJ, Prakash UB, Maldonado F. Foreign body aspiration in adult airways: therapeutic approach. J Thorac Dis. 2017;9(9):3398–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Limper AH, Prakash UB. Tracheobronchial foreign bodies in adults. Ann Intern Med. 1990;112(8):604–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lin L, Lv L, Wang Y, Zha X, Tang F, Liu X. The clinical features of foreign body aspiration into the lower airway in geriatric patients. Clin Interv Aging. 2014;9:1613–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kosutova P, Mikolka P. Aspiration syndromes and associated lung injury: incidence, pathophysiology and management. Physiol Res. 2021;70(Suppl4):S567–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen CH, Lai CL, Tsai TT, Lee YC, Perng RP. Foreign body aspiration into the lower airway in Chinese adults. Chest. 1997;112(1):129–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mise K, JurcevSavicevic A, Pavlov N, Jankovic S. Removal of tracheobronchial foreign bodies in adults using flexible bronchoscopy: experience 1995–2006. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(6):1360–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Donado Una JR, de Miguel PE, Casado Lopez ME, Alfaro Abreu JJ. Fiber optic bronchoscopy in extraction of tracheo-bronchial foreign bodies in adults. Arch Bronconeumol. 1998;34(2):76–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ben-Dov I, Aelony Y. Foreign body aspiration in the adult: an occult cause of chronic pulmonary symptoms. Postgrad Med J. 1989;65(763):299–301.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Reyad HM, El-Deeb ME, Abbas AM, Sherief D, Elagamy OA. Foreign body aspiration in Egyptian children clinical, radiological and bronchoscopic findings. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021;14:2299–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sersar SI, Rizk WH, Bilal M, et al. Inhaled foreign bodies: presentation, management and value of history and plain chest radiography in delayed presentation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;134(1):92–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ibrahim Sersar S, Hamza UA, AbdelHameed WA, et al. Inhaled foreign bodies: management according to early or late presentation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005;28(3):369–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Courvoisier DS, Combescure C, Agoritsas T, Gayet-Ageron A, Perneger TV. Performance of logistic regression modeling: beyond the number of events per variable, the role of data structure. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(9):993–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Agoritsas T, Merglen A, Shah ND, O’Donnell M, Guyatt GH. Adjusted analyses in studies addressing therapy and harm: users’ guides to the medical literature. JAMA. 2017;317(7):748–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wu X, Liu X, Zhou Y, et al. 3-month, 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month respiratory outcomes in patients following COVID-19-related hospitalisation: a prospective study. Lancet Respir Med. 2021;9(7):747–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu X, Zhou H, Zhou Y, et al. Risk factors associated with disease severity and length of hospital stay in COVID-19 patients. J Infect. 2020;81(1):e95–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wu X, Wang T, Zhou Y, et al. Different laboratory abnormalities in COVID-19 patients with hypertension or diabetes. Virol Sin. 2020;35(6):853–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu X, Zhou H, Zhou Y, et al. Temporal radiographic changes in COVID-19 patients: relationship to disease severity and viral clearance. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):10263.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ramos MB, Fernandez-Villar A, Rivo JE, et al. Extraction of airway foreign bodies in adults: experience from 1987–2008. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009;9(3):402–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lan RS. Non-asphyxiating tracheobronchial foreign bodies in adults. Eur Respir J. 1994;7(3):510–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Boyd M, Chatterjee A, Chiles C, Chin R Jr. Tracheobronchial foreign body aspiration in adults. South Med J. 2009;102(2):171–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sancho-Chust JN, Molina V, Vanes S, Pulido AM, Maestre L, Chiner E. Utility of flexible bronchoscopy for airway foreign bodies removal in adults. J Clin Med. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9051409.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Hsu AA. Endoscopic intervention of lower airway foreign matter in adults-a different perspective. J Thorac Dis. 2015;7(10):1870–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Choroomi S, Curotta J. Foreign body aspiration and language spoken at home: 10-year review. J Laryngol Otol. 2011;125(7):719–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Gendeh BS, Gendeh HS, Purnima S, Comoretto RI, Gregori D, Gulati A. Inhaled foreign body impaction: a review of literature in malaysian children. Indian J Pediatr. 2019;86(Suppl 1):20–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Zissin R, Shapiro-Feinberg M, Rozenman J, Apter S, Smorjik J, Hertz M. CT findings of the chest in adults with aspirated foreign bodies. Eur Radiol. 2001;11(4):606–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhong B, Sun SL, Du JT, et al. Risk factors for lower respiratory tract infection in children with tracheobronchial foreign body aspiration. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(10): e14655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Piovesan A, Vancauwenberghe V, Van De Looverbosch T, Verboven P, Nicolai B. X-ray computed tomography for 3D plant imaging. Trends Plant Sci. 2021;26(11):1171–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Marin-Diez E, Landeras Alvaro RM, Lamagrande Obregon A, Pelaz Esteban M, Gallardo AE. Ultrasonography of subcutaneous foreign bodies: differences depending on their nature, complications, and potential diagnostic errors. Radiologia (Engl Ed). 2020;62(1):3–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Dindar H, Konkan R, Cakmak M, Barlas M, Gokcora H, Yucesan S. A bronchopleurocutaneous fistula caused by an unusual foreign body aspiration simulating acute abdomen. Eur J Pediatr. 1994;153(2):136–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Freiman MA, McMurray JS. Unique presentation of a bronchial foreign body in an asymptomatic child. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2001;110(6):495–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Mehta AC, Khemasuwan D. A foreign body of a different kind: pill aspiration. Ann Thorac Med. 2014;9(1):1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Blanco Ramos M, Botana-Rial M, Garcia-Fontan E, Fernandez-Villar A, Gallas TM. Update in the extraction of airway foreign bodies in adults. J Thorac Dis. 2016;8(11):3452–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Mi W, Zhang C, Wang H, et al. Measurement and analysis of the tracheobronchial tree in Chinese population using computed tomography. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(4): e0123177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge all the patients involved in this study. For the purpose of open access, the authors have applied a CC-BY public copyright license to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.

Funding

YW was funded by the UK Medical Research Council (MR/S025480/1) and the UK Royal Society (IEC\NSFC\191030). CS was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81800064), Science project of the Wuhan Bureau of Science and Technology (2020020601012322), and Science project of the Wuhan Health Commission (WX20Q11). The funding bodies and sponsors had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, or interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; or decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Xiaofan Liu, Fang Ni, Tao Guo and Fangfang Jiang contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430014, Hubei, China

    Xiaofan Liu, Fang Ni, Cheng Song, Mingli Yuan, Zhaowu Tao, Mingxin Ye, Junjie Xu, Ying Wang, Qiong Qian & Yi Hu

  2. Biological Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK

    Tao Guo & Yihua Wang

  3. Department of Mathematical Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK

    Fangfang Jiang

  4. Department of Radiology, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430014, Hubei, China

    Yan Jiang

  5. Institute for Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK

    Yihua Wang

  6. NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK

    Yihua Wang

Authors
  1. Xiaofan Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fang Ni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tao Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fangfang Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yan Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Cheng Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Mingli Yuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Zhaowu Tao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Mingxin Ye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Junjie Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Ying Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Qiong Qian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Yi Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Yihua Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YW, YH, and XL had the idea for and designed the study. All authors had full access to the data and had final responsibility for the decision to submit it for publication. YW, YH, XL, FN, TG, and FJ drafted the paper. TG, FJ, XL, FN, YH, and YW did the analysis and all authors critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content and gave final approval for the version to be published. XL, FN, YJ, CS, MYuan, ZT, MYe, JX, YingW, and QQ collected the data. All authors agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yi Hu or Yihua Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Central Hospital of Wuhan, Hubei, China (Approval No.: WHZXKYL2022-052). Informed consent was not deemed necessary owing to the retrospective nature of the study.

Consent for publications

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Methods.

Flexible bronchoscopy. Table S1. Bronchoscopy findings. Table S2. Univariate logistic regression analysis for risk factors associated with radiolucent FBA in adults. Table S3. Multivariable logistic regression analysis for risk factors associated with radiolucent FBA in adults.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, X., Ni, F., Guo, T. et al. Risk factors associated with radiolucent foreign body inhalation in adults: a 10-year retrospective cohort study. Respir Res 23, 238 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-022-02165-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-022-02165-9

Keywords

  • Foreign body aspiration
  • Radiolucent, radiopaque
  • Multi-detector Computed Tomography (MDCT)
  • Flexible bronchoscopy
  • Adult

Respiratory Research

ISSN: 1465-993X

Contact us