Skip to main content
Download PDF

SINFONIA study protocol: a phase II/III randomised controlled trial examining benefits of guided online group singing in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and interstitial lung disease and their carers

Respiratory Research volume 23, Article number: 208 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and interstital lung disease (ILD) are incurable conditions characterised by airflow limitation, persisting respiratory symptoms, and progressive respiratory failure. People living with COPD or ILD often suffer from chronic and severe breathlessness, with limited treatment options and low engagement rates with current therapies. Group singing represents a potential community-based therapy to improve quality of life for patients with COPD or ILD and breathlessness.

Methods

This protocol papers describes SINFONIA, a parallel, double-arm, randomised, blinded-analysis, mixed-methods phase II/III trial of guided, online group singing that will be conducted over 24 months. Adults with confirmed COPD or ILD, on stable treatment for at least four weeks at time of recruitment, with a modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnoea score of two or greater, who are capable and willing to give consent, and not currently participating in pulmonary rehabilitation will be eligible to participate. Carers may optionally enrol in the trial. Data will be collected on quality of life, anxiety and depression, breathlessness, mastery of breathing, exercise tolerance, loneliness, healthcare utilisation, and carer quality of life (optional). Participants will be randomised 1:1 to intervention or control arms with intervention arm attending one 90 min, guided, online, group singing session per week for 12 weeks and control arm continuing routine care. Phase II of the trial aims to determine the feasibility and acceptability of guided, online group singing and will collect preliminary data on effectiveness. Phase III aims to determine whether guided, online group singing has an effect on quality of life with the primary outcome being a between arm difference in quality of life (36-item Short Form Survey) measured at 12 weeks.

Discussion

SINFONIA is the first study is the first of its kind in Australia and to our knowledge, the first to deliver the singing intervention program entirely online. Determining the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of guided, online group singing is an important step towards improving low-cost, low-risk, community-based therapeutic options for patients living with COPD or ILD and breathlessness.

Trial registration: Phase II—ACTRN12621001274864, registered 20th September 2021; Phase III—ACTRN12621001280897, registered 22nd September 2021.

Background

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an incurable condition characterised by airflow limitation, persisting respiratory symptoms, and progressive respiratory failure [1]. In Australia, COPD represents 43% of all chronic respiratory disease burden [2], affecting 30% of people aged over 75 years [3], with disproportionate impacts on those living in regional areas or with lower socioeconomic status [4]. With over 72,000 admissions each year attributable to COPD, it is the third leading cause of avoidable hospitalisation and generates significant healthcare costs [5, 6]. Internationally, COPD is the second most common respiratory disease after asthma in the United Kingdom [7] and the third leading cause of death worldwide [8]. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is an umbrella term which captures a large group of diseases resulting in fibrosis of the lungs [9], which often generate distressing, progressive symptoms, and account for a further 8% of chronic respiratory disease burden in Australia [2].

Breathlessness is “a subjective experience of breathing discomfort that consists of qualitatively distinct sensations that vary in intensity” which derive from a complex interaction of physiological, psychological, and environmental factors [10]. It is the most common symptom in people with advanced lung disease (ALD), including COPD [11] and ILD [12], and is notoriously difficult to treat [13, 14]. Breathlessness is frequently associated with depression, anxiety, loss of function, social isolation and reduced quality of life [15,16,17]. Additionally, the presence of breathlessness is a predictor of unscheduled healthcare use, hospitalisation and mortality in patients with ALD [18, 19].

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a well-established, holistic, therapeutic program encompassing tailored exercise, breath training, psychosocial counselling, and patient education, which has been shown to improve symptoms and function, and reduce hospitalisations [20]. Despite these benefits, referral to, and completion of, PR programs in patients with ALD is alarmingly low [21]. Of the nearly 1.5 million older Australians living with symptomatic COPD, fewer than 10% have ever accessed a program [22]; and internationally fewer than 3% have accessed pulmonary rehabilitation after hospitalisation for an exacerbation of their disease [23]. Participation rates for people with ILD are not well documented. Common barriers to participating in PR include: poor understanding of the program by health professionals and patients, complicated referral pathways, challenges travelling long distances or attending in person (due to symptoms or lack of social support) [24], and limited availaibility of in-person programs in many areas (which has been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic) [23]. Given these challenges, there is a need for sustainable, novel, community-based interventions that are acceptable to patients and their carers, and effective in reducing symptom burden.

Singing is a low-cost, low-risk activity that is recommended for a range of health conditions including neurological [25], mental health [26], and respiratory disorders [27]. Singing can be delivered as a guided, weekly, group-based activity, emphasising focus and control of breathing for patients with ALD. Trials of guided, group singing as a respiratory health intervention have been conducted in New Zealand [28], China [29], Brazil [30], and the United Kingdom [31,32,33]. Although evidence of robust physiological benefits is mixed [30, 34, 35], studies report improvements to anxiety and depression [28, 29, 33, 35], exercise tolerance [28], and overall quality of life [29,30,31,32, 35]. These trials are frequently limited by low study numbers and high risk of bias [27, 36]. To date there are no trials of singing as a therapeutic intervention for ALD in Australia, or in patients with ILD internationally. Robust and long-term studies in the Australian context and in different disease groups are necessary to determine the acceptability and healthcare cost–benefit of guided, group singing for patients with ALD.

Restrictions imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic limit the feasibility of face-to-face singing groups given the aerosol generating nature of singing, and raise the question of whether guided, group singing can offer the same benefits when the intervention is delivered entirely online. Nevertheless, online delivery represents an attractive opportunity to improve healthcare access for participants with limited mobility, poor health, or who live in a rural location with limited access to health services. This is particularly relevant in Australia, where a third of the population lives in regional or remote areas with reduced service availability [37] despite chronic respiratory disease being overrepresented amongst this group [38]. The SINFONIA study (a clinical trial examining the benefits of SingINg For breathing in COPD aNd ILD pAtients) aims to determine the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of guided, online, group singing as an intervention to improve quality of life in patients with COPD or ILD with significant breathlessness living in Australia.

Methods

Study design and setting

A parallel, double-arm, randomised, blinded-analysis, mixed-methods phase II/III trial of guided, online group singing will be conducted over 24 months. Adults with COPD or ILD and their adult carers (optional) will be eligible to participate. Methods reported in this paper are reflective of protocol version 1.2, 30th September 2021. Participants will be recruited from tertiary respiratory care clinics based at the Alfred Hospital, Austin Health, Royal Melbourne Hospital, and St Vincent’s Hospital in Melbourne, Australia. People who are not cared for by these health services may also be referred to the study by their primary care provider (e.g., general practitioner) or by self-referral. An advertising poster with eligibility criteria and contact details will be circulated amongst specialist and community pulmonary care services to enable referral. All referred patients will be reviewed by an investigator at a study site to confirm eligbility. Ethics approval for the study was obtained from the St Vincent’ Hospital Melbourne Human Research and Ethics Committee (LRR 237/21).

Participants

Adults with confirmed COPD or ILD, on stable treatment for at least four weeks at time of recruitment, with a modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnoea score of two or greater, who are capable and willing to give consent, are eligible to participate. Diagnosis of COPD or ILD must be confirmed by lung function testing within the past two years or computed tomography (CT) chest scan within the past five years. Stable treatment is defined as no new or altered doses of cardiorespiratory medications (including antibiotics and oral steroids) as assessed by the study site clinician, and no hospital admissions for exacerbation of their underlying disease within the past four weeks. Participants who are actively enrolled in a PR program are excluded from participation; however past completion is permitted. No other exclusion criteria exist. A nominated carer (aged 18 years or over) per participant may optionally be enrolled. Referral of participants who are not patients of the study site clinics is permitted. Informed written consent will be obtained by an appropriately trained member of the study team.

Intervention and data collection

Participants and their carers (optional) will be enrolled for a period of 12-weeks (Fig. 1). After signing consent, participants will be randomised 1:1 to intervention or control arms with the randomisation sequence developed by the trial statistician using permuted block design (Stata statistical package [39]), and stratified by disease type (ILD vs COPD). Allocation sequence will not be visible to personnel involved in study recruitment. Participants randomised to the intervention arm will attend one 90-minute, guided, online, group singing session per week for 12 weeks. Enrollment will be on a rolling basis with a maximum of 12 patient participants and 12 carers, with up to two groups running concurrently.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study diagram

Full size image

The online program will be delivered via a teleconferencing platform such as Zoom. Online, group singing sessions will be conducted by a senior music therapist with expertise in singing and delivering an individualised, enjoyable singing repertoire suitable for patients with ALD (Table 1). Singing activities will focus on breathing control and will include a warm-up. Participants will be encouraged to suggest songs. During the 90 minute class, some time will be dedicated to socialisation and group connection. The exact content and structure of the online group singing sessions will be refined during phase II.

Table 1 SINFONIA music therapy session plan
Full size table

In addition to attending weekly, guided, online, group singing sessions, participants will be given music CDs, with repertoire and exercises from the guided group singing sessions, to utilise regularly at home. Control arm participants will receive standard care for 12 weeks, with the option to enroll in 12 weeks of guided, online, group singing at the completion of the study period (no data will be collected during this optional period). Participants and their carers will be contacted at 4-week intervals to collect study assessments. The intervention may be discontinued at any time at the participants request or if the site principal investigator deems a participant too unwell to continue. Data will be collected and stored on a REDcap server which is at least as secure as the source. Data will be accessible only by authorised members of the study team and will be stored in accordance with relevant local policies and guidelines to ensure confidentiality.

Aims and outcomes

Phase II of the trial aims to determine the feasibility and acceptability of guided, online group singing and will collect preliminary data on effectiveness. The primary outcome of feasibility and acceptability will be assessed by the number of participants (and optional carers) that can be recruited, enrolled, and who complete the study within a six-month period (Table 2). Completion will be defined as attendance at a minimum of eight out of 12 sessions over a 12-week period for the intervention arm and completion of the 12-week assessment for the control arm.

Table 2 Phase II and III primary and secondary outcomes
Full size table

Phase III aims to determine whether guided, online group singing has an effect on quality of life with the primary outcome being between arm difference in quality of life (36-item Short Form Survey (SF-36)) measured at 12 weeks (Table 2) [40]. Secondary outcomes measured using between arm differences at the 12-week timepoint include effects on: anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)) [41], breathlessness (Dyspnoea-12) [42], breathlessness mastery (Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire—Self Administered Standardised mastery subdomain (CRQ-SAS)) [43, 44], exercise tolerance (6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT)) [45], loneliness (University of California Los Angeles Loneliness Scale version 3 Short Form (UCLA-3)) [46], healthcare utilisation (self-report), carer quality of life (SF-36, optional), patient and carer perceptions of group singing (thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews) [47], and social dynamics and interactions (ethnographic observation) [48]. We hypothesise that 12 weeks of online, guided group singing will improve health-related quality of life relative to baseline compared to usual care.

Online, group singing sessions will be attended and/or recorded and reviewed by a member of the study team to conduct ethnographic analyses on the interactions between patients, carers, and singing instructors. Additionally, a purposive sample of up to 15 participants from ILD, COPD, and carer groups will be recruited for semi-structured interviews before, during, and after the intervention period to investigate perceptions of the guided, online, group singing intervention. A related ethics approval has been obtained to allow interviews with eligible participants who elect not to continue with the main study (St Vincents Hospital Melbourne HREC, LRR 111.21).

Sample size

No formal power calculation was performed for phase II. Participant numbers will be assessed at 6-months to determine feasibility of phase III. For phase III, given a minimally clinically relevant difference in SF-36 of 10 points (SD 16) [31, 35] and assuming 80% power and 5% significance level, at least 42 participants per arm are required. To account for 40% attrition rate, at least 140 participants will be recruited. Due to the rolling nature of the singing groups, the clustering effect is assumed to be minimal, therefore no adjustment for clustering has been performed.

Treatment allocation

Treatment allocation will be in 1:1 ratio. A randomisation sequence will be developed by the trial statistician who is not involved in recruitment using permuted block design using Stata software [39], stratified by disease type (COPD vs ILD). No trial investigators or personnel will have access to the allocation sequence.

Safety and adverse event reporting

At each study follow up timepoint, the participants are encouraged to mention any problems since the last visit. For all randomised participants all adverse events, irrespective of causality, will be assessed and recorded as per Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation Trials Coordination Centre Standard Operating Procedure 5.17 Adverse Event Reporting [49]. The time period includes the time from randomisation, monthly during the intervention period and at the follow-up review. For patients who meet the eligibility criteria and then do not proceed to randomisation, any adverse events detected during that window of time, should also be reported. If an adverse event is the reason that a person does not proceed to randomisation, this should be recorded. All adverse events will be reported in summary to the reviewing HREC and site RGO and will be followed-up until: resolution; condition stabilises; event can be explained; participant is lost to follow-up; or death.

Statistical analyses

Phase II feasibility and acceptability outcomes will be analysed descriptively. Outcomes from phase II will inform the delivery of phase III. Phase III primary and secondary outcomes will be analysed on intention-to-treat basis using mixed effect linear regression. Participants will be entered as random coefficients, while time, treatment arm and an interaction between them will be entered as fixed terms. Residuals will be visually inspected and if the model is of poor fit, the outcome will be transformed using natural logarithms. The primary outcome will be expressed as the difference in SF-36 at 12 weeks with 95% confidence intervals. If the model remains of poor fit despite the outcome transformation, then mixed effect ordinal logistic model will be used and results will be expressed as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Additional per protocol analysis will be performed using a subgroup of participants who have completed the last visit and have completed at least 8 sessions over 12 weeks.

Multiple exploratory subgroup analyses will be performed, including: sex (female vs male), age group (60 years, 60–70 years, or > 70 years), disease severity (mild-moderate vs severe), disease type (COPD vs ILD), prior psychological disease (present vs absent), breathlessness (mMRC of 2 vs 3 vs 4), and previous pulmonary rehabilitation (yes vs no). Subgroup analysis will be performed by including an interaction term between subgroup and treatment arm in the initial model. Additional analysis will involve the associations between change in the outcome and compliance to intervention and presence of carer in group sessions. These will be performed using linear regression. Outcomes are collected at multiple time-points throughout the study to allow for better missing data imputation, which will be performed within the mixed effects model (using maximum likelihood estimation).

Semi-structured interviewing will continue until sufficient information power is reached [50]. Given the narrow scope of the qualitative analyses, it is anticipated that sufficient information will be attained with a maximum of 15 COPD patients, 15 ILD patients and 15 carers. Each interview will be transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed for perceived patient and carer preferences, barriers, and opportunities based on the approach described by Braun and Clarke [47]. A purposive selection of session recordings will be analysed for patient experiences, actions, behaviours, and responses based on the approach described by Goodson and Vassar [48]. These qualitative outcomes will supplement the quantitative primary and secondary outcomes from phase III.

Reporting results

This protocol paper has been prepared in accordance with Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) guidelines [51, 52]. All results will be reported according to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement for reporting randomised trials [53]. A participant flow diagram will include baseline characteristics, distribution of participants between arms, and number of participants with missing data. Baseline characteristics will be presented by arm using median (with interquartile range) for non-parametric data, or mean (with standard deviation) for normally distributed continuous variables; and as frequencies (percentages) for categorical variables. There will be no adjustment for multiple secondary outcomes, however, the results of secondary outcomes will be interpreted in light of multiple comparisons and focus will be given to their clinical significance.

Discussion

The SINFONIA study aims to determine the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of guided online group singing as an intervention to improve quality of life in people with COPD and ILD patients and significant breathlessness, and their carers. This study is the first of its kind in Australia and to our knowledge, the first to deliver a singing intervention program to this patient group entirely online.

Some benefits of group singing in patients with ALD have been attributed to the social support and connection with other people with a similar condition that is incidentally formed via regular participation in a group activity. Online delivery represents a major hurdle in delivery of this intervention and it is unclear whether online group singing can facilitate comparable social connection opportunities and thus overall benefits. A similar singing intervention has been delivered entirely online over six weeks to participants experiencing persistent symptoms following COVID-19 infection (long COVID-19) in the UK, with singing resulting in an improvement in the mental health component of the SF-36 when compared with usual care [54]. These results are promising, however the mean age of long COVID-19 patients in that study is considerably lower than that of other ALD patients participating in face-to-face group singing (49 vs 71 years) [32]. Digital literacy is likely to be much greater amongst younger cohorts, indeed 70% of long COVID-19 participants anticipated no barriers to participation in an online intervention at baseline [54]. The same trend does not appear to hold true for other ALD patients. One prior study transitioned from face-to-face delivery to online five weeks into a 12-week intervention and reported a decline in attendance from 90 to 53% [33]. Participants in that study cited online access and digital literacy as barriers to participation. Semi-structured interviews and ethnographic analyses conducted in the current study aim to identify whether these barriers are present in the current cohort. Additionally, separate ethics approval will allow interviews with eligible participants who elect not to continue with the study and may help identify strategies to improve access for these groups.

A major confounding variable across previous respiratory, group singing studies is whether the participant in the singing program had undertaken PR or not at the same time as participating in guided, group singing activities. Two previous singing interventions recruited participants directly from PR groups [28, 55] however, this makes it difficult to separate benefits from singing programs from those arising from recent PR. Later trials have specifically targeted patients with no recent PR involvement [32] in an attempt to better control this variable. Aside from the clinical benefits of PR, patients from that cohort have a proven ability to engage with regular, group health interventions that occur over several weeks. A current trial from the “Sing Your Lungs Out” (SYLO) group in New Zealand is specifically targeting people who have refused or not been offered PR, however, that study is yet to return results [28]. Our trial excludes patients currently enrolled in PR, but permits prior attendance, in an effort to best replicate real-world application of guided online group singing as a community-based intervention, which can potentially augment and prolong the known benefits of PR, and additionally, may appeal to patients who are otherwise reluctant to engage in PR.

Of the two major implementations of guided, group singing in respiratory health, SYLO and Singing for Lung Health (SLH, UK), both groups have maintained high levels of ongoing participation beyond the initial intervention period, reflective of the perceived value to participants. SYLO reported an 85% attendance rate throughout the intervention and participants continued to regularly meet 18 months after inception [36, 56]. Similarly, SLH is now an expansive network of affiliated and independent groups across the UK. Whilst the demand for guided, group singing programs for people with COPD and other lung conditions is evident, there is no clear pipeline of funding or ongoing support to maintain these groups beyond a trial period. Both SYLO and SLH have adopted a model of encouraging groups to become self-sufficient and both largely rely on volunteer efforts and donations to remain viable. This donation-driven model of funding raises issues of accessibility and equity and as such, healthcare economics analyses are essential to determine the feasibility of guided singing groups as a funded health intervention. A service evaluation of SLH retrospectively assessed healthcare utilisation of 228 participants with COPD following 12 weeks of guided, group singing and reported a reduction in general practitioner visits and hospital admissions, though this data was derived from self-reported recall and had no control group [27]. The more robust measure of hospital admissions from patient medical record audit data were captured for SYLO participants, with no changes in admission frequency identified following one year of attending the guided, group singing program. However, again there was no control group, with instead data compared to historical baseline admission data for participants [28]. Our current study utilises self-reported healthcare utilisation data collected on a 4-weekly basis throughout the trial period, with a standard care control arm comparator to determine any unscheduled healthcare utilisation benefits in the Australian context.

Conclusion

Patients with COPD and ILD live with a severe and prolonged symptom burden. Current therapeutic interventions are known to be effective but are often limited in uptake due to a range of referral and participation barriers. Online guided, group singing is a low-risk, low-cost intervention which can be delivered in the community that may have physiological and/or psychosocial benefits to patients with COPD or ILD. The SINFONIA study is a phase II/III clinical trial of online guided, group singing as an intervention to improve quality of life in patients with COPD or ILD and breathlessness.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

6MWT:

6-Minute walk test

ALD:

Advanced lung disease

CONSORT:

Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials

COPD:

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

CRQ-SAS:

Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire—Self Administered Standardised

CT:

Computed tomography

HADS:

Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

ILD:

Interstitial lung disease

mMRC:

Modified medical research council dyspnoea score

PR:

Pulmonary rehabilitation

SF-36:

36-Item Short Form Survey

SINFONIA:

A clinical trial examining the benefits of SingINg FOr breathing in COPD aNd ILD pAtients

SLH:

Singing for Lung Health (UK singing intervention)

SPIRIT:

Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials

SYLO:

Sing Your Lungs Out (New Zealand intervention)

UCLA-3:

University of California Los Angeles Loneliness Scale version 3 Short Form

References

  1. GOLD. Global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease (GOLD). Global strategy for the diagnosis, management and prevention of COPD (2018 report). 2018. www.goldcopd.org. Accessed Jun 2018.

  2. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). The burden of chronic respiratory conditions in Australia: A detailed analysis of the Australian Burden of Disease Study 2011. Australian Government: Australia; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Toelle BG, Xuan W, Bird TE, et al. Respiratory symptoms and illness in older Australians: the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease (BOLD) study. Med J Aust. 2013;198(3):144–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Health AIo Welfare. Chronic respiratory conditions. Canberra: AIHW; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) snapshot. Canberra: AIHW; 2018. Cat. no: ACM 35.

  6. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Health workforce [Internet]. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2020. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/australias-health/health-workforce. Accessed 14 Feb 2021.

  7. Snell N, Strachan D, Hubbard R, et al. Burden of lung disease in the UK; findings from the British Lung Foundations respiratory health of the nation’ project. Eur Respir J. 2016;48(suppl 60):PA4913.

    Google Scholar 

  8. World Health Organisation (WHO). The top 10 causes of death 2020. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death. Accessed 9 Dec 2020.

  9. Demedts M, Wells AU, Antó JM, et al. Interstitial lung diseases: an epidemiological overview. Eur Respir J Suppl. 2001;32:2s–16s.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. American Thoracic Society. Dyspnea: mechanisms, assessment, and management. A consensus statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;159(1):321–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Blinderman CD, Homel P, Billings JA, et al. Symptom distress and quality of life in patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009;38(1):115–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ryerson CJ, Collard HR, Pantilat SZ. Management of dyspnea in interstitial lung disease. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2010;4(2):69–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jennings AL, Davies AN, Higgins JP, et al. A systematic review of the use of opioids in the management of dyspnoea. Thorax. 2002;57(11):939–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Smallwood N, Gaffney N, Gorelik A, et al. Breathlessness and palliative oxygen therapy in advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Intern Med J. 2018;48(4):483–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yohannes AM, Alexopoulos GS. Depression and anxiety in patients with COPD. Eur Respir Rev. 2014;23(133):345.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Reddy SK, Parsons HA, Elsayem A, et al. Characteristics and correlates of dyspnea in patients with advanced cancer. J Palliat Med. 2009;12(1):29–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bu F, Philip K, Fancourt D. Social isolation and loneliness as risk factors for hospital admissions for respiratory disease among older adults. Thorax. 2020;75(7):597–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Celli BR, Cote CG, Marin JM, et al. The body-mass index, airflow obstruction, dyspnea, and exercise capacity index in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(10):1005–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ong KC, Earnest A, Lu SJ. A multidimensional grading system (BODE index) as predictor of hospitalization for COPD. Chest. 2005;128(6):3810–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Moore E, Palmer T, Newson R, et al. Pulmonary rehabilitation as a mechanism to reduce hospitalizations for acute exacerbations of COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Chest. 2016;150(4):837–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Johnston K, Grimmer-Somers K. Pulmonary rehabilitation: overwhelming evidence but lost in translation? Physiother Can. 2010;62(4):368–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Spitzer KA, Stefan MS, Priya A, et al. Participation in pulmonary rehabilitation after hospitalization for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among medicare beneficiaries. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019;16(1):99–106.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Stone PW, Hickman K, Steiner MC, et al. Predictors of referral to pulmonary rehabilitation from UK primary care. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020;15:2941–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen Z, Fan VS, Belza B, et al. Association between social support and self-care behaviors in adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017;14(9):1419–27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Monroe P, Halaki M, Kumfor F, Ballard KJ. The effects of choral singing on communication impairments in acquired brain injury: a systematic review. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2020;55(3):303–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Perkins R, Yorke S, Fancourt D. How group singing facilitates recovery from the symptoms of postnatal depression: a comparative qualitative study. BMC Psychol. 2018;6(1):41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Lewis A, Cave P, Stern M, et al. Singing for lung health-a systematic review of the literature and consensus statement. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2016;26:16080.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. McNaughton A, Weatherall M, Williams M, et al. Sing your lungs out-a community singing group for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a 1-year pilot study. BMJ Open. 2017;7(1):e014151.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu H, Song M, Zhai Z-H, et al. Group singing improves depression and life quality in patients with stable COPD: a randomized community-based trial in China. Qual Life Res. 2019;28(3):725–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Bonilha AG, Onofre F, Vieira ML, et al. Effects of singing classes on pulmonary function and quality of life of COPD patients. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2009;4:1–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Lord VM, Hume VJ, Kelly JL, et al. Singing classes for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Pulm Med. 2012;12:69.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Lewis A, Cave P, Hopkinson NS. Singing for lung health: service evaluation of the British Lung Foundation programme. Perspect Public Health. 2018;138(4):215–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Philip KE, Lewis A, Jeffery E, et al. Moving singing for lung health online in response to COVID-19: experience from a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2020;7(1):e000737.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Morrison I, Clift S. A UK feasibility study on the value of singing for people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) September 2011 to June 2012: Ian Morrison. Eur J Public Health. 2013;23(1):170.

  35. Lord VM, Cave P, Hume VJ, et al. Singing teaching as a therapy for chronic respiratory disease–a randomised controlled trial and qualitative evaluation. BMC Pulm Med. 2010;10:41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. McNamara RJ, Epsley C, Coren E, McKeough ZJ. Singing for adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;12(12):Cd012296.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Philip J, Wiseman R, Eastman P, et al. Mapping non-malignant respiratory palliative care services in Australia and New Zealand. Aust Health Rev. 2020;44(5):778–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. The burden of chronic respiratory conditions in Australia: a detailed analysis of the Australian Burden of Disease Study 2011. Canberra: AIHW; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  39. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 17. College Station: StataCorp LLC; 2021.

  40. Ware JE Jr. SF-36 health survey update. Spine. 2000;25(24):3130–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67(6):361–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Yorke J, Moosavi SH, Shuldham C, Jones PW. Quantification of dyspnoea using descriptors: development and initial testing of the Dyspnoea-12. Thorax. 2010;65(1):21–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Guyatt GH, Berman LB, Townsend M, et al. A measure of quality of life for clinical trials in chronic lung disease. Thorax. 1987;42(10):773–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Schünemann HJ, Griffith L, Jaeschke R, et al. A comparison of the original chronic respiratory questionnaire with a standardized version. Chest. 2003;124(4):1421–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Butland RJ, Pang J, Gross ER, et al. Two-, six-, and 12-minute walking tests in respiratory disease. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982;284(6329):1607–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Hughes ME, Waite LJ, Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT. A short scale for measuring loneliness in large surveys: results from two population-based studies. Res Aging. 2004;26(6):655–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Goodson L, Vassar M. An overview of ethnography in healthcare and medical education research. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2011;8:4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. IMPACCT Trials Coordination Centre. Standard Operating Procedure 5.17 Adverse Event Reporting V2.3. University of Technology Sydney; 2020.

  50. Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, et al. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ : British Medical Journal. 2013;346: e7586.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(3):200–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Rennie D. CONSORT revised–improving the reporting of randomized trials. JAMA. 2001;285(15):2006–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Philip KEJ, Owles H, McVey S, et al. An online breathing and wellbeing programme (ENO Breathe) for people with persistent symptoms following COVID-19: a parallel-group, single-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2022;S2213-2600(22)00125-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00125-4

  55. Pacheco C, Costa A, Amado J, Almeida P. Singing in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: a pilot study in Portugal. Rev Port Pneumol. 2014;20(4):225–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. McNaughton A, Aldington S, Williams G, Levack WM. Sing Your Lungs Out: a qualitative study of a community singing group for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). BMJ Open. 2016;6(9): e012521.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge and thank the Windermere Foundation for financial support of this study. We acknowledge the following people who contributed to protocol development for this study: Professor Karen Willis, Dr Rebecca Disler, and Dr Anna Spathis; and senior music therapist, Mr Matt Lewin, for the development and delivery of the SINFONIA music therapy session plan.

Funding

This study is sponsored by St Vincents Hospital Melbourne (research.ethics@svhm.org.au) and supported by funding from the Windermere Foundation, Melbourne, Australia. Additionally, A/Prof Natasha Smallwood received research grant funding (as an Investigator grant fellowship) from the National Health and Research Medical Council to support this work. Funding bodies and sponsor have no role in the research activity. All authors are independent from the funders and will have access to the study data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Respiratory Medicine, The Alfred Hospital, 55 Commercial Road, Prahran, VIC, 3004, Australia

    Natasha Smallwood

  2. Department of Allergy, Immunology and Respiratory Medicine, Central Clinical School, The Alfred Hospital, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia

    Natasha Smallwood & Amy Pascoe

  3. Department of Medicine, St Vincents Hospital, University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC, 3065, Australia

    Sara Vogrin

  4. Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    Jennifer Philip

  5. Centre for Palliative Care, St Vincent’s Hospital, Fitzroy, Australia

    Jennifer Philip

Authors
  1. Natasha Smallwood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amy Pascoe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sara Vogrin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jennifer Philip
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

NS, AP, SV, and JP contributed to conception and design of the study protocol. NS and AP prepared the main manuscript text. NS, AP, SV, and JP reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natasha Smallwood.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval for the study was obtained from St Vincents Hospital Melbourne Human Research and Ethics Committee (LRR 237/21).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Smallwood, N., Pascoe, A., Vogrin, S. et al. SINFONIA study protocol: a phase II/III randomised controlled trial examining benefits of guided online group singing in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and interstitial lung disease and their carers. Respir Res 23, 208 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-022-02133-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-022-02133-3

Keywords

Respiratory Research

ISSN: 1465-993X

Contact us