Skip to main content
Download PDF

Effect of different corticosteroid regimes for hospitalised patients with exacerbated COPD: pooled analysis of individual participant data from the REDUCE and CORTICO-COP trials

Respiratory Research volume 22, Article number: 155 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Systemic corticosteroid administration for severe acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) reduces the duration of hospital stays. Corticosteroid-sparing regimens have showed non-inferiority to higher accumulated dose regimens regarding re-exacerbation risk in patients with AECOPD. However, it remains unclear whether 14-day or 2–5-day regimens would result in shorter admission durations and changes in mortality risk. We explored this by analysing the number of days alive and out of hospital based on two randomised controlled trials with different corticosteroid regimens.

Methods

We pooled individual patient data from the two available multicentre randomised trials on corticosteroid-sparing regimens for AECOPD: the REDUCE (n = 314) and CORTICO-COP (n = 318) trials. In the 14-day regimen group, patients were older, fewer patients received pre-treatment with antibiotics and more patients received pre-treatment with systemic corticosteroids. Patients randomly allocated to the 14-day and 2–5-day regimens were compared, with adjustment for baseline differences.

Results

The number of days alive and out of hospital within 14 days from recruitment was higher for the 2–5 day regimen group (mean 8.4 days; 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.0–8.8) than the 14-day regimen patient group (4.2 days; 95% CI3.4–4.9; p < 0.001). The 14-day AECOPD group had longer hospital stays (mean difference, 5.4 days [standard error ± 0.6]; p < 0.0001) and decreased likelihood of discharge within 30 days (hazard ratio [HR] 0.5; 95% CI 0.4–0.6; p < 0.0001). Comparing the 14-day regimen and the 2–5 day regimen group showed no differences in the composite endpoint ‘death or ICU admission’ (odds ratio [OR] 1.4; 95% CI 0.8–2.3; p = 0.15), new or aggravated hypertension (OR 1.5; 95% CI 0.9–2.7; p = 0.15), or mortality risk (HR 0.8; 95% CI 0.4–1.5; p = 0.45) during the 6-month follow-up period.

Conclusion

14-day corticosteroid regimens were associated with longer hospital stays and fewer days alive and out of hospital within 14 days, with no apparent 6-month benefit regarding death or admission to ICU in COPD patients. Our results favour 2–5 day regimens for treating COPD exacerbations. However, prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

Background and rationale

Current guidelines recommend that systemic corticosteroids should be used to treat severe acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) [1]. A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (n = 1700) assessed the effectiveness of systemic corticosteroids compared to placebo in treating COPD exacerbations. Most of the studies from the meta-analysis were based on hospitalised patients. The meta-analysis showed that corticosteroids shorten hospital stays by approximately 1 day and have a moderately positive effect on pulmonary function tests and 30-day re-exacerbation rate, but do not seem to have any influence on survival [2]. The effects of systemic corticosteroids in treating AECOPD are temporary, lasting only 3–5 days. The risk of admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) or re-exacerbations after the first month appears to be unaltered [2, 3]. Corticosteroids affect the expression of various genes, especially those regulating the innate and the adaptive immune system [4], leading to a variety of beneficial and harmful effects [5,6,7,8] such as increasing the risk of acute or chronic infections [9, 10], the onset or aggravation of diabetes mellitus [11, 12], and osteoporotic fractures[9]. Therefore, minimising the unnecessary exposure of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations to systemic corticosteroids is crucial. To date, two RCTs have investigated how such unnecessary exposure can be minimised, without attenuating the documented beneficial effects [13, 14]. In the REDUCE trial, patients hospitalised for AECOPD were randomly assigned to either 14 days (standard) or 5 days (intervention) of treatment with 40 mg of daily prednisone. The CORTICO-COP trial randomly assigned patients to 5-day (standard) or eosinophil-guided (intervention) therapy, with the latter regimen resulting in a median of 2 days of treatment with prednisolone.

However, it remains unclear whether 14-day or 2–5-day regimens would result in shorter admission durations and changes in mortality risk. We explored this by analysing the number of days alive and out of hospital based on two trial populations with different dosing regimens.

Material and methods

Study participants

We studied individual patient data from two investigator-initiated non-inferiority trials of systemic corticosteroids for exacerbated COPD. The first study was the REDUCE trial, a multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority study (n = 314) comparing a short-term (5 days) with a conventional (14 days) systemic corticosteroid treatment. From March 2006 through February 2011, consecutive patients with AECOPD were screened for eligibility at the emergency departments of five Swiss teaching hospitals. Inclusion criteria were exacerbation of COPD as defined by the presence of at least two of the following: change in baseline dyspnoea, cough, or sputum quantity or purulence, age older than 40 years, and a smoking history of 20 pack-years or more. Exclusion criteria were a history of asthma, ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) to forced vital capacity (FVC) greater than 0.70 as evaluated by bedside post-bronchodilator spirometry prior to randomisation, radiological diagnosis of pneumonia, estimated expected survival of less than 6 months due to severe comorbidity, pregnancy or lactation, prior inclusion in the trial, and inability to provide written informed consent. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients before randomisation. The follow-up period was 6 months [13].

The other study was the CORTICO-COP trial, a nationwide multicentre prospective trial (n = 318) investigating eosinophil-guided corticosteroid treatment for AECOPD [14]. All consecutive patients admitted to the wards of the participating sites were eligible if they were included within 24 h of admission, were aged at least 40 years old, had known airflow limitation (defined as post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio ≤ 0.70), and a specialist-verified diagnosis of COPD based on stable disease-state data. Exacerbations were defined according to the consensus definition described by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) committee: acute worsening of respiratory symptoms that results in additional therapy. Exclusion criteria included any history of asthma (self-reported or physician-diagnosed), life expectancy of less than 30 days, severe COPD exacerbation requiring invasive ventilation or admission to an ICU, allergy to systemic corticosteroids, severe mental illness that could not be controlled by medication, people detained under the act on the use of coercion in psychiatry, severe language difficulties or the inability to provide written informed consent, pregnancy or lactation, systemic fungal infections, or patients receiving more than 10 mg of maintenance systemic corticosteroids daily. Written informed consent was obtained from patients before randomisation. Patients could only participate in the trial once.

Interventions

In the REDUCE trial, patients were randomised to either: (a) 5 days of 40 mg daily systemic prednisone, followed by 9 days of placebo or (b) 14 days of 40 mg daily systemic prednisone.

In the CORTICO-COP trial, all patients received 80 mg of methylprednisolone on day 1, followed by either: (a) 37.5 mg of daily prednisolone for 4 days or (b) prednisolone only on the days when peripheral blood eosinophil count was ≥ 300 cell/microliter Most patients' first eosinophil count was recorded prior to their first dose of corticosteroids.

Apart from prednisolone, all participants received additional nebulized short-acting beta-2 agonists and short-acting antimuscarinic agents as needed while hospitalised. Physiotherapy, supplemental oxygen, and ventilatory support were administered according to American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society guidelines. We compared the 14-day prednisone group with the 2–5 day prednisone group (Fig. 1). The 2–5 days prednisone treatment group was considered the reference group.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart showing the study cohort

Full size image

Outcome measures

The primary outcome was days alive and out of hospital within 14 days after recruitment. We also analysed the following short- and long-term secondary outcomes: (i) length of hospital stay, (ii) rate of discharge within 30 days, (iii) all-cause mortality during a 6-month follow-up period, (iv) combined endpoint ‘ICU admission and all-cause mortality’ within 6 months, and (v) newly diagnosed or aggravation of pre-existing hypertension.

Statistical methods

Continuous normally distributed variables are presented as means ± standard deviations (SD), non-normally distributed data are presented as medians with interquartile ranges. Categorical variables are presented as counts and proportions. Lengths of hospital stay are reported as means ± SD. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess the association between corticosteroid dose and all-cause mortality during the 6-month follow-up period, as well as time to discharge within 30 days. The multivariable model was adjusted for possible confounding variables, including age, sex, smoking status, pre-treatment with antibiotics, and pre-treatment with corticosteroids. Logistic regression models were used to analyse the outcomes “death or admission to ICU during the 6-month follow-up period” and “new or aggravated hypertension” and adjusted for the same confounding variables. Statistical significance was defined as a p-value ≤ 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9·4 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA) and the statistical software R (version 3.6.3).

Results

The mean age of the 629 patients included in this study was 72 ± 10 years, and 52.5% of them were male. The baseline demographic data for the two trials were not similar. In the CORTICO-COP trial, the mean age was higher, more patients were female, and pre-treatment with antibiotics was more common. In contrast, patients in the REDUCE trial were more likely to have had pre-treatment with systemic corticosteroids (Additional file 1: Table 1). In the 14-day regimen group, patients were older, fewer received pre-treatment with antibiotics and more patients received pre-treatment with systemic corticosteroids. In addition, there were slight differences in blood pressure between the groups at baseline (Table 1).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of study participants from the primary trials
Full size table

As shown in Table 2, the number of days alive and out of hospital within 14 days was greater for the low–medium (mean 8.4 days; 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.0–8.8) than the 14-day regimen group (mean 4.2 days; 95% CI 3.4–4.9; p < 0.001; Fig. 2A). The 14-day regimen group had longer hospital stays (mean difference 5.4 days [SE ± 0.6]; p < 0.0001; Fig. 2B), and lower likelihood of discharge within 30 days (hazard ratio [HR] 0.5; 95% CI 0.4–0.6; p < 0.0001; Fig. 3). An adjusted Cox regression analysis revealed no difference between the two groups in mortality risk during the 6-month follow-up period (HR 0.8; 95% CI 0.4–1.5; p = 0.45). Adjusted logistic models showed there were no differences between the two groups in risk of ‘death or admission to an ICU’ (odds ratio [OR] 1.4; 95% CI 0.8–2.3]; p = 0.15) or new/aggravated hypertension (OR 1.5; 95% CI 0.9–2.7; p = 0.15) during the 6-month follow-up period.

Table 2 Analysis of outcomes
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

A Days alive and out of hospital within 14 days, B Length of hospital stay

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Time to discharge within 30 days

Full size image

As a sensitivity analysis, we looked at the length of hospital stay and mortality rates for the 5-day regimen compared to the 14-day regimen. The 5-day regimen resulted in a shorter length of stay (mean difference, 5.4 days [SE ± 0.6]; p < 0.0001). The mortality rates in both groups were similar during the 6-month follow-up period (HR 0.8 [0.4–1.7]; p = 0.58; Additional file 1: Table 2).

Discussion

This two-study meta-analysis showed that patients randomly allocated to the 2–5-day corticosteroid dose group had more days alive and out of hospital within 14 days after recruitment than those randomly allocated to the 14-day dose group. In addition, data recorded for the lengths of hospital stay and time to discharge favoured treatment with 2–5-day dose corticosteroids. Although there was no difference between the groups in the risks of ICU admission or death and new or aggravated hypertension, there was a trend towards poorer outcomes in the 14-day dose group. These observations are consistent with previous observational studies that have shown greater risks of infection and mortality when patients are treated with corticosteroids for 10 days rather than 5 days [6, 15]. As in this analysis, the REDUCE trial found that the median length of hospital stay in the 5-day group dose group was 1 day shorter than in the 14-day dose group [13]. Other studies have reached similar conclusions regarding the duration of treatment. A recent meta-analysis compared short-term (≤ 7 days) with longer-term (> 7 days) systemic corticosteroid treatment of patients with exacerbation of severe or very severe COPD and found no differences in the likelihood of treatment failure, risk of relapse, change in lung function tests or adverse effects [16]. Several studies suggest that an even shorter duration of systemic corticosteroid treatment (e.g., 3 days [17], 5 days [13] or 7 days [18]) may be as effective as longer courses in hospitalised patients with AECOPD. These results are similar to those of previous systematic reviews [19] and support the use of shorter systemic corticosteroid treatment regimens.

Corticosteroids are well known for their vast array of side effects both in the short term and over an extended period [20], including new/aggravated diabetes [12], hyperglycaemia, and hypertension [14]. Short-term treatment with systemic corticosteroids has also been associated with an increased risk of bone fractures, venous thromboembolism, and sepsis [9, 21], as well as an increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding or perforation [22]. Because of these potentially serious adverse effects, it is important to minimise the administration of corticosteroids, particularly for patients with frequent COPD exacerbations. The introduction of biological agents has led to a reduction in systemic corticosteroid use in other disease areas [23], and these agents may also benefit patients with COPD in the future. Emerging data also show that increased levels of blood eosinophils may function as a biomarker for a positive response to corticosteroid treatment. Conversely, when blood eosinophils levels are low, patients with AECOPD may be less likely to respond well to systemic corticosteroid treatment [24,25,26]. Some evidence suggests that blood eosinophil levels may be measured to reduce corticosteroid use in patients with COPD exacerbations [24, 27]. Importantly, corticosteroid treatment may not benefit patients with exacerbations that are associated with bacterial infections [25, 28]. Microbiome studies have demonstrated that AECOPD treatment with systemic corticosteroids can result in an increased bacterial burden and an increased abundance of specific airway microbiota that persists for several weeks [29]. Taken together, these data do not support the universal prescription of systemic corticosteroids for patients with AECOPD and suggest that this could do more harm than good in some patients.

The strengths of this analysis included its relatively large sample size and the multi-centre RCT design of its constituent studies. It is a strength, that all patients were randomly allocated to a corticosteroid regimen, which eliminates the risk of bias by indication, otherwise a limitation that can be hard to overcome in pooled data; in both the REDUCE and CORTICO-COP trials, the corticosteroid doses administered were subject to randomisation, and not based on the severity of the disease. We used the primary outcome “Days alive and out of hospital within 14 days after recruitment” due to its high sensitivity as an outcome measure, and it was used to report the results of the CORTICO-COP trial. In addition, using this outcome measure avoids lead-time bias since patients who died early would not be counted as having a short length of stay [14, 30]. Systemic corticosteroid therapy seems to shorten the duration of hospital stays compared to placebo. Therefore, we only included studies in which corticosteroids were provided in both trial arms. To test our hypothesis, comparison with a placebo group was unnecessary. Some limitations do, however, need to be considered. We recognize that these two trials were conducted several years apart, and different treatment durations could have explanations other than corticosteroid dose (e.g., the length of hospital admission for an AECOPD may have changed due to better community COPD services). However, the studies are similar in many aspects because there have been few major changes in AECOPD treatment during the years between the trials. Approximately half of the patients in the CORTICO-COP trial were treated with inhaled corticosteroids. We did not have access to the corresponding data for the REDUCE study population; however, because this was a randomised trial, the proportion of patients who received ICS should be similar in the two arms of this trial. Importantly, baseline values differed between the two trials, with REDUCE study patients being more ill. Therefore, it was necessary to adjust for these differences in our analyses (Additional file 1: Table 1). It is also possible that the difference in length of admission and mortality risk between the 14-day regimen and the 2–5-day regimen groups may be attributable not only to corticosteroid dose but also to responsiveness to corticosteroids, which may be influenced by history of asthma, smoking status and blood eosinophil levels. All patients with asthma were carefully excluded from both trials. There was no difference in the number of current smokers between the groups. Unfortunately, there were no blood eosinophil count data from the REDUCE study. Finally, our study may have lacked the necessary power to reliably evaluate the risk of mortality. Therefore, further studies will be necessary to confirm our risk of mortality findings.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our data do not support using 14-day systemic corticosteroid regimens to treat hospitalised patients with COPD exacerbations. Patients who were randomly assigned to 2–5-day systemic corticosteroid regimens showed more favourable primary outcomes; a result driven by the substantially shorter admission durations. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that these results are due to factors other than corticosteroid dose.

Availability of data and materials

CORTICO-COP data will be available from 1 January 2023, upon request from investigators, if approved by the CORTICO-COP principal investigator and the COP: TRIN Steering Committee. If approved, the data collected for the CORTICO-COP trial, including individual participant data and a data dictionary defining each field in the set, will be made available to others in the form of deidentified participant data. The study protocol and statistical analysis plan for the original study is available at www.coptrin.dk. Informed consent forms will not be available, in accordance with Danish legislation.

Abbreviations

AECOPD:

Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

ICU:

Intensive care unit

FEV1 :

Forced expiratory volume in 1 s

FVC:

Forced vital capacity

GOLD:

Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease

HR:

Hazard ratio

OR:

Odds ratio

References

  1. Singh D, Agusti A, Anzueto A, Barnes PJ, Bourbeau J, Celli BR, et al. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive lung disease: the GOLD Science Committee Report 2019. Eur Respir J. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00164-2019.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Walters JA, Tan DJ, White CJ, Gibson PG, Wood-Baker R, Walters EH. Systemic corticosteroids for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001288.pub4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Niewoehner DE, Erbland ML, Deupree RH, Collins D, Gross NJ, Light RW, et al. Effect of systemic glucocorticoids on exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(25):1941–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Galon J, Franchimont D, Hiroi N, Frey G, Boettner A, Ehrhart-Bornstein M, et al. Gene profiling reveals unknown enhancing and suppressive actions of glucocorticoids on immune cells. FASEB J. 2002;16(1):61–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Agusti C, Rano A, Filella X, Gonzalez J, Moreno A, Xaubet A, et al. Pulmonary infiltrates in patients receiving long-term glucocorticoid treatment: etiology, prognostic factors, and associated inflammatory response. Chest. 2003;123(2):488–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sivapalan P, Ingebrigtsen TS, Rasmussen DB, Sorensen R, Rasmussen CM, Jensen CB, et al. COPD exacerbations: the impact of long versus short courses of oral corticosteroids on mortality and pneumonia: nationwide data on 67 000 patients with COPD followed for 12 months. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2019;6(1):e000407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Borresen SW, Klose M, Baslund B, Rasmussen AK, Hilsted L, Friis-Hansen L, et al. Adrenal insufficiency is seen in more than one-third of patients during ongoing low-dose prednisolone treatment for rheumatoid arthritis. Eur J Endocrinol. 2017;177(4):287–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cain DW, Cidlowski JA. Immune regulation by glucocorticoids. Nat Rev Immunol. 2017;17(4):233–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Waljee AK, Rogers MA, Lin P, Singal AG, Stein JD, Marks RM, et al. Short term use of oral corticosteroids and related harms among adults in the United States: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2017;357:j1415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Smit J, Kaasch AJ, Sogaard M, Thomsen RW, Nielsen H, Froslev T, et al. Use of glucocorticoids and risk of community-acquired Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: a population-based case-control study. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016;91(7):873–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Upadhyay J, Trivedi N, Lal A. Risk of future type 2 diabetes mellitus in patients developing steroid-induced hyperglycemia during hospitalization for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation. Lung. 2020;198(3):525–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Aldibbiat AM, Al-Sharefi A. Do benefits outweigh risks for corticosteroid therapy in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in people with diabetes mellitus? Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020;15:567–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Leuppi JD, Schuetz P, Bingisser R, Bodmer M, Briel M, Drescher T, et al. Short-term vs conventional glucocorticoid therapy in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the REDUCE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2013;309(21):2223–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sivapalan P, Lapperre TS, Janner J, Laub RR, Moberg M, Bech CS, et al. Eosinophil-guided corticosteroid therapy in patients admitted to hospital with COPD exacerbation (CORTICO-COP): a multicentre, randomised, controlled, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2019;7(8):699–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Groenewegen KH, Schols AM, Wouters EF. Mortality and mortality-related factors after hospitalization for acute exacerbation of COPD. Chest. 2003;124(2):459–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Walters JA, Tan DJ, White CJ, Wood-Baker R. Different durations of corticosteroid therapy for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;3:CD006897.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sayiner A, Aytemur ZA, Cirit M, Unsal I. Systemic glucocorticoids in severe exacerbations of COPD. Chest. 2001;119(3):726–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen G, Xie CM, Luo YF. The effects and therapeutic duration of oral corticosteroids in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases. Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2008;31(8):577–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ma Z, Zhang W. Short-term versus longer duration of glucocorticoid therapy for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2016;40:84–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bleecker ER, Menzies-Gow AN, Price DB, Bourdin A, Sweet S, Martin AL, et al. Systematic Literature Review Of Systemic Corticosteroid Use For Asthma Management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;201(3):276–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rogers MAM, Lin P, Nallamothu BK, Kim C, Waljee AK. Longitudinal study of short-term corticosteroid use by working-age adults with diabetes mellitus: risks and mitigating factors. J Diabetes. 2018;10(7):546–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Butler E, Moller MH, Cook O, Granholm A, Penketh J, Rygard SL, et al. The effect of systemic corticosteroids on the incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2019;45(11):1540–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Alten R, Nusslein H, Galeazzi M, Lorenz HM, Nurmohamed MT, Bensen WG, et al. Decreased use of glucocorticoids in biological-experienced patients with rheumatoid arthritis who initiated intravenous abatacept: results from the 2-year ACTION study. RMD Open. 2016;2(1):e000228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bafadhel M, McKenna S, Terry S, Mistry V, Pancholi M, Venge P, et al. Blood eosinophils to direct corticosteroid treatment of exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186(1):48–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sivapalan P, Jensen JU. Non-eosinophilic severe exacerbations of COPD: what about antibiotics?—authors’ reply. Lancet Respir Med. 2019;7(11):e34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bafadhel M, Davies L, Calverley PM, Aaron SD, Brightling CE, Pavord ID. Blood eosinophil guided prednisolone therapy for exacerbations of COPD: a further analysis. Eur Respir J. 2014;44(3):789–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sivapalan P, Lapperre TS, Janner J, Laub RR, Moberg M, Bech CS, et al. Eosinophil-guided corticosteroid therapy in patients admitted to hospital with COPD exacerbation (CORTICO-COP): a multicentre, randomised, controlled, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30176-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bafadhel M, McKenna S, Terry S, Mistry V, Reid C, Haldar P, et al. Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: identification of biologic clusters and their biomarkers. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184(6):662–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Huang YJ, Sethi S, Murphy T, Nariya S, Boushey HA, Lynch SV. Airway microbiome dynamics in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52(8):2813–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ariti CA, Cleland JG, Pocock SJ, Pfeffer MA, Swedberg K, Granger CB, et al. Days alive and out of hospital and the patient journey in patients with heart failure: insights from the candesartan in heart failure: assessment of reduction in mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program. Am Heart J. 2011;162(5):900–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

REDUCE: We thank project nurses Ursula Duerring, Yolanda Leibbrandt, and Sabrina Maier for their work on this project. CORTICO-COP: We are grateful for the work performed by project nurse Svenja Andersen and medical student Freja Stæhr Holm. We would like to thank all the relevant departments in the Capital Region of Denmark and the participating hospitals in Switzerland for allowing us to recruit patients. We would also like to thank the COP:TRIN Steering Committee for their helpful advice.

Funding

This study was funded by the Danish Regions Medical Fund (Grant No. 5894/16) and the Danish Council for Independent Research (Grant No. 6110-00268B). The research salary for P.S. was provided by Herlev-Gentofte University Hospital. Alexander G. Mathioudakis and Jørgen Vestbo were supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) and Manchester Biomedical Research Centre (BRC).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Pradeesh Sivapalan, Jonas Rutishauser, Philipp Schüetz and Jens-Ulrik Jensen have contributed equally

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Section of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hellerup, Denmark

    Pradeesh Sivapalan, Josefin Eklöf, Vibeke Gottlieb, Karin Armbruster & Jens-Ulrik Jensen

  2. Department of Medicine, Clinical Trial Unit, Kantonsspital Baden, 4054, Baden, Switzerland

    Jonas Rutishauser

  3. Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, 4001, Basel, Switzerland

    Jonas Rutishauser, Jörg D. Leuppi & Philipp Schüetz

  4. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital-Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark

    Charlotte Suppli Ulrik, Julie Janner & Mia Moberg

  5. University Clinic of Medicine, Kantonsspital Baselland, 4410, Liestal, Switzerland

    Jörg D. Leuppi & Beat Mueller

  6. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Bispebjerg University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Lars Pedersen

  7. Department of Cardiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hellerup, Denmark

    Tor Biering-Sørensen

  8. Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Tor Biering-Sørensen

  9. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Antwerp University Hospital, and Laboratory of Experimental Medicine and Pediatrics, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium

    Therese S. Lapperre

  10. Department of Respiratory and Infectious Diseases, Frederiksund and Hillerød Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Thyge L. Nielsen & Andrea Browatzki

  11. The North West Lung Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK

    Alexander Mathioudakis & Jørgen Vestbo

  12. Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK

    Alexander Mathioudakis & Jørgen Vestbo

  13. Medical University Department, Kantonsspital Aarau, 5001, Aarau, Switzerland

    Beat Mueller & Philipp Schüetz

  14. Department of Internal Medicine, Zealand University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, 4000, Roskilde, Denmark

    Pradeesh Sivapalan

Authors
  1. Pradeesh Sivapalan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jonas Rutishauser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Charlotte Suppli Ulrik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jörg D. Leuppi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lars Pedersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Beat Mueller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Josefin Eklöf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Tor Biering-Sørensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Vibeke Gottlieb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Karin Armbruster
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Julie Janner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Mia Moberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Therese S. Lapperre
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Thyge L. Nielsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Andrea Browatzki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Alexander Mathioudakis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Jørgen Vestbo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Philipp Schüetz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Jens-Ulrik Jensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Pradeesh Sivapalan, Jonas Rutishauser, Philipp Schüetz and Jens-Ulrik Jensen conceived this study. Pradeesh Sivapalan prepared the initial draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to critical revision of the paper for intellectual content. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pradeesh Sivapalan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

CORTICO-COP was approved by the ethics committees of all participating sites (H-15012207). The Danish Medicines Agency (EudraCT Number 2015-003441-26) and the Danish Data Protection Agency (HGH-2015-038 and I-Suite number 04014). REDUCE was approved by the ethics committees of all participating sites (Project Number: EKBB_167/05) and the Swiss Agency for Therapeutic Products (Swissmedic; project number: 2006DR4021). The trial was registered with ISCRTN (isrctn.org identifier: ISRCTN19646069). Written informed consent was obtained from patients before randomisation from both trials.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, describing any conflicts of interest. None of the authors have any conflicts of interest that are directly related to this work.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Baseline characteristics of study participants from the primary trials. Table S2. Analysis of outcomes

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sivapalan, P., Rutishauser, J., Ulrik, C.S. et al. Effect of different corticosteroid regimes for hospitalised patients with exacerbated COPD: pooled analysis of individual participant data from the REDUCE and CORTICO-COP trials. Respir Res 22, 155 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-021-01745-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-021-01745-5

Keywords

  • COPD
  • Exacerbation
  • Corticosteroids
  • Mortality
  • Days alive and out of hospital
  • Intensive care unit

Respiratory Research

ISSN: 1465-993X

Contact us