Skip to main content

Surfactant protein D and bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a new way to approach an old problem

Abstract

Surfactant protein D (SP-D) is a collectin protein synthesized by alveolar type II cells in the lungs. SP-D participates in the innate immune defense of the lungs by helping to clear infectious pathogens and modulating the immune response. SP-D has shown an anti-inflammatory role by down-regulating the release of pro-inflammatory mediators in different signaling pathways such as the TLR4, decreasing the recruitment of inflammatory cells to the lung, and modulating the oxidative metabolism in the lungs. Recombinant human SP-D (rhSP-D) has been successfully produced mimicking the structure and functions of native SP-D. Several in vitro and in vivo experiments using different animal models have shown that treatment with rhSP-D reduces the lung inflammation originated by different insults, and that rhSP-D could be a potential treatment for bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), a rare disease for which there is no effective therapy up to date. BPD is a complex disease in preterm infants whose incidence increases with decreasing gestational age at birth. Lung inflammation, which is caused by different prenatal and postnatal factors like infections, lung hyperoxia and mechanical ventilation, among others, is the key player in BPD. Exacerbated inflammation causes lung tissue injury that results in a deficient gas exchange in the lungs of preterm infants and frequently leads to long-term chronic lung dysfunction during childhood and adulthood. In addition, low SP-D levels and activity in the first days of life in preterm infants have been correlated with a worse pulmonary outcome in BPD. Thus, SP-D mediated functions in the innate immune response could be critical aspects of the pathogenesis in BPD and SP-D could inhibit lung tissue injury in this preterm population. Therefore, administration of rhSP-D has been proposed as promising therapy that could prevent BPD.

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD)

Incidence and definition

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) was first described in 1967 [1] and still remains as the most common complication of preterm birth [2]. Improvements in the clinical management of preterm babies at risk of BPD and the continuous advances in modern medicine keep decreasing the gestational age (GA) for survival of premature infants. Due to increases in survival coupled with the lack of effective therapies for BPD, the incidence of BPD has not decreased but increased lately. The incidence of BPD is influenced by the hospitals, countries – how they manage preterm babies- and also by the diagnosis criteria applied to define BPD [2, 3].

The definition of BPD has evolved since it was first described in 1967. Progress in the understanding of BPD pathophysiology and changes in the clinical management of preterm infants with the tools available in modern medicine, specially related to surfactant therapy, ventilation, CPAP and oxygen support, have pushed the evolution of the BPD definition. The latest definition proposed by Jensen et al. is a modification of the NICHD workshop definition [4] to introduce a severity scale that is based on the level of respiratory support at 36 postmenstrual age (PMA) weeks instead of supplemental oxygen [5]. It classifies BPD severity of infants at 36 PMA weeks as no BPD (no support), grade 1 (nasal cannula ≤ 2 L/min), grade 2 (nasal cannula > 2 L/min or non-invasive positive airway pressure) and grade 3 (invasive mechanical ventilation) [5].

Pathogenesis

The mechanisms and pathophysiology underlying BPD are complex and not completely understood. BPD affects the epithelial and endothelial components of the lung. Alveolar and vascular development are closely intertwined in the developing fetal lung. Therefore, the epithelial lung damage observed in BPD is accompanied by an impairment of the pulmonary vascular development and angiogenesis in BPD patients [2]. BPD also impacts organs outside the lung such as the brain [2, 6]. In this review we focus on the events or factors that affect the lung epithelia and lead to BPD development. Preterm infants are born with their lungs at early morphogenesis stages, canicular or saccular, instead of the alveolar stage observed in term infants [2, 7, 8]. The intrinsic prematurity of the pre-term lung with low pulmonary surfactant lipid levels, low surfactant protein levels, underdeveloped antioxidant mechanisms, low compliance and inadequate fluid clearance, combined with the presence of inflammation, which is developed as a consequence of several pre- and postnatal factors, causes a heterogenous injury in the lungs that results in BPD. Lungs of BPD patients exhibit fewer secondary septa and alveoli that is translated in disrupted alveolarization, cystic emphysema, fibrosis characterized as fibrotic tissue with widening and thickening of the interstitial spaces, activated pro-inflammatory responses with granulocyte recruitment and increased white blood cells, cytokines, oxidants [2, 4, 9]. All these lung alterations result in the abnormal and inefficient gas exchange and impaired lung mechanics that is observed in BPD patients.

Prenatal factors that increase the risk of BPD development are genetic susceptibility, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) that limits lung growth and maturation, maternal smoking, pregnancy-related hypertensive risks and chorioamnionitis [2, 10]. Chorioamnionitis is particularly relevant in the context of this review because it promotes a pro-inflammatory response in the fetal lung. Chorioamnionitis produces inflammation of intrauterine fetal membranes, maternal decidua and amniotic fluid, which most often associated with the colonization by vaginal commensals pathogens such as Ureaplasma sp. The fetal lung is exposed to the inflammatory mediators in the amniotic fluid via fetal breathing and resulting in lung inflammation that contributes to BPD development [11, 12]. Animal models of chorioamnionitis have shown that it may also affect the endogenous surfactant protein levels of the fetal lung, including SP-D. The expression of SP-D in the fetal lung was reduced in a mouse model of chorioamnionitis that induced preterm birth 8 h after intraperitoneal lipopolysaccharide (LPS) administration [13]. In contrast, a lamb study found increased SP-D expression in lungs 14 days after intra-amniotic LPS administration where delivery was performed by cesarean [14].

Postnatal factors that contribute to BPD are oxygen therapy, mechanical ventilation, postnatal infections -sepsis-, respiratory microbial dysbiosis and vascular events such as patent ductus arteriosus (PDA). Oxygen exposure induces the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which combined with the immature anti-oxidant mechanisms of the premature lung may lead to accumulation of toxic levels of ROS in the alveoli. ROS can damage cell constituents such as membrane lipids and structural proteins leading to cell death and lung tissue damage [10, 15]. During this process, cytokines and chemo-attractant factors are released to recruit more inflammatory cells to the alveoli that also coincides with the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome. Macrophages and activated neutrophils release even more pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g. IL-6, IL-1β, IL-8, TNF-α), macrophage inflammatory proteins, metalloproteinases, proteases, neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). At the same time the production of anti-inflammatory cytokines (e.g. IL-10) is decreased, thus exacerbating inflammation and enhancing the epithelial damage [10, 16,17,18,19,20,21,22] (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure1

Factors that contribute to alveolar arrest in BPD. Several factors contribute to the development of inflammation in BPD. Mechanical ventilation and oxygen therapy may lead to volutrauma and barotrauma. Hyperoxia induces cell damage, apoptosis and NETosis, which are translated to a pro-inflammatory response with increased production of pro-inflammatory mediators (such as metalloproteinases, cytokines, etc.). Secondary infections and sepsis caused by pathogens (such as viruses and bacteria) activate pro-inflammatory pathways to eliminate the threat, but this inflammatory response promotes the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, IL-1β, TNFα, etc.) which contribute to lung injury. Chorioamnionitis and other factors may also contribute to the development of BPD. The intrinsic prematurity of the lungs from premature infants with enlarged alveolar spaces, typical of canicular or saccular morphological stages, and the immature SP-D at decreased levels also contribute to the development of BPD

Supplemental oxygen can be administered with different techniques that can be non-invasive or invasive in different degrees. In some cases, mechanical ventilation is needed in addition to supplemental oxygen for proper gas exchange and breathing. Besides the oxidative stress induced by the supplemental oxygen administered by mechanical ventilation, mechanical ventilation contributes to BPD by itself (Fig. 1). Although ventilation strategies of preterm babies have improved over the years and techniques have tried to minimize lung injury whenever possible; however, mechanical ventilated lungs are still exposed to artificial high pressures, stretch, high tidal volumes and overextension which increases lung tissue injury and activation of pro-inflammatory cascades, contributing also to BPD [10, 20, 23, 24].

Sepsis is another postnatal factor that also contributes to BPD. Infection by pathogens including gram positive bacteria, gram negative bacteria and fungus boosts an inflammatory response to fight the invading microorganisms that promotes recruitment of inflammatory cells to the lungs and release of pro-inflammatory mediators that cause alveolar damage [25,26,27,28] (Fig. 1).

The heterogeneous injury originated in BPD lungs and its progression have been observed by several imaging techniques like magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computerized tomography (CT). Ultrashort echo time MRI (UTE-MRI) is a sensitive, nonionizing technique that has demonstrated to reliably identify BPD severity and predict short-term outcomes of patients. UTE-MRI can also distinguish cystic versus normal lung regions, showing that cystic areas are ventilated areas with a higher tidal volume than normal lung areas [29,30,31]. These novel lung imaging techniques have allowed clinicians and researchers to improve their understanding of the pathology, progression and function of the BPD lung in newborn infants and through childhood.

There are long-term consequences derived from the damage to the lungs of preterm babies during BPD. These patients have impaired post-natal alveolar growth with an abnormal structure and lung function that is clinically manifested in multiple ways. The risk of hospitalization due to complicated respiratory episodes triggered by common viral infections such as Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) or influenza virus is highly increased in this population. During childhood and adulthood, obstructive lung disease with chronic lung dysfunction is observed and they have an increased risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [2]. Therefore, the lung damage induced by BPD is translated to long-term respiratory outcomes that significantly decrease the quality of life of these patients.

BPD therapies

To date, there are no effective therapies that specifically target the multifactorial complex scenario observed in BPD patients. Strategies regarding oxygen therapy and mechanical ventilation have been improved over the years, decreasing oxygen saturation levels and applying less invasive and gentler ventilation strategies, to reduce the lung injury associated with both measures. In addition, new, less invasive techniques have emerged to administer exogenous pulmonary surfactant at birth that do not require intratracheal intubation. Exogenous pulmonary surfactant has drastically improved survival of preterm infants by facilitating the transition to air breathing of premature infants [32,33,34,35]. Despite surfactant therapy, many infants, especially the very preterm ones, still require oxygen supplementation and mechanical ventilation after surfactant therapy to facilitate appropriate gas exchange in the lungs and survive. Despite the promise of surfactant therapy during its early implementation, it has been shown that surfactant therapy itself does not decrease the rate of BPD [35, 36].

There are three therapies that have shown some modest benefits in BPD cohorts that have been reviewed in detail by other authors [2, 35, 37]. First, steroid therapy, as anti-inflammatory drugs, has been shown to reduce inflammation and improve pulmonary function in premature infants, however, corticosteroids bring associated secondary adverse effects that in some cases may outweigh the benefits. Lately, different strategies are being tested to decrease the associated risks and enhance the benefits [2, 37], these strategies include administration of lower doses [38, 39], use of different routes of administration rather than systemic, and co-administration – of budesonide in this case- with exogenous pulmonary surfactant [40, 41]. Second, caffeine therapy has demonstrated that it can reduce the risk of BPD and the duration of mechanical ventilation when administered early in life (before 3 days of life). However, it has a tight therapeutic range and adverse effects such as a pro-inflammatory response have been observed when its levels are out of the appropriate range [42, 43]. Lastly, supplementation with vitamin A is associated with a small reduction in BPD or death at 36 weeks GA, however, this reduction was only observed in children weighing less than 1,000 g [44, 45].

There are new therapies under investigation at preclinical or early clinical stages that could be promising to reduce BPD: stem cell therapy, insulin like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) [35, 37, 46], and recombinant human surfactant protein D (rhSP-D) [47].

Surfactant protein D (SP-D)

SP-D

Surfactant protein D (SP-D) is a collectin protein that is found in the lungs as well as in other extra-pulmonary mucosa [48, 49]. In the fetal lung, SP-D has been detected at 10–20 weeks of age and the levels of pulmonary SP-D increase during gestation until term labor [48, 50]. SP-D accomplishes a critical role in the innate immune function of the lungs where it recognizes, opsonizes and promotes the phagocytosis and clearance of invading infectious pathogens [51] and other noxious entities such as nano- or micro-particles accidentally inhaled from the environment [52, 53]. In addition, SP-D regulates inflammatory responses by modulating several inflammatory signaling pathways, such as the toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) pathway [54, 55]. SP-D also influences pulmonary surfactant lipids homeostasis and ultrastructure [56, 57] with a relevant role in the newborn period by decreasing surfactant pool sizes [58].

SP-D is synthesized by alveolar type II pneumocytes as different oligomeric forms: trimers (minimal protein unit secreted by alveolar type II cells), hexamers, dodecamers and higher order oligomers that are variable in size (also called “fuzzy balls”) [59,60,61] (Fig. 2). Dodecamers and higher order oligomers have been described to be the most active oligomeric forms of the protein at least for the lectin-mediated functions [62, 63].

Fig. 2
figure2

Recombinant human SP-D observed by atomic force microscopy (AFM). AFM images of rhSP-D in which the different oligomeric forms of SP-D can be observed: trimers (single and short stick-like structures), hexamers composed of two trimers observed as V-shaped structures in these images, dodecamers (cross-like structures) the most common specie observed in these images, and higher order oligomers or “fuzzy balls” with a ball-like shape. The scale bar represents 200 nm

Full length recombinant human SP-D (rhSP-D) has been successfully produced in different cell systems with a structure and function comparable to human native SP-D [60,61,62] raising the possibility of using rhSP-D as a therapeutic agent. Intensive pre-clinical research has been done, including in vitro and in vivo experiments targeting the different aspects of BPD, that demonstrate SP-D could target several factors that participate in BPD pathogenesis. Therefore, in this section we will address the potential of using rhSP-D as a therapy to prevent and/or treat BPD.

Recombinant hSP-D targets BPD inflammation

Multiple studies have demonstrated that inflammation generated as a result of all the different factors previously described is the central player in BPD pathogenesis, leading to lung injury. The application of rhSP-D as a therapy to prevent and treat BPD would reduce inflammation by down-regulating pro-inflammatory signaling pathways and mediators, and at the same time, it would specifically target some of the external factors, such as neonatal infection, that induce the pro-inflammatory responses (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure3

Surfactant protein D (SP-D) mechanisms to counteract BPD inducing factors. SP-D antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activities could prevent the alveolar damage induced by chorioamnionitis. SP-D contributes to surfactant stability and homeostasis, actions that in combination with its anti-inflammatory action could help to prevent the damage caused by mechanical ventilation and oxygen therapy. SP-D inhibits viral replication, opsonizes and induces aggregation of invading pathogens in secondary lung infections and sepsis to boost their clearance, which is also translated in decreased inflammation. Administration of exogenous SP-D could replenish lung SP-D deficient levels in the preterm lungs and provide oligomerized active SP-D. Last, SP-D could protect the lung from the effects of hyperoxia by inhibiting the recruitment of inflammatory cells, regulating reactive oxygen species (ROS) metabolism, attenuating NETosis, and therefore, decreasing inflammation

Inflammatory pathways mediated by TLR2 and TLR4 are activated in BPD by damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) that are endogenous molecules released by damaged cells, or by pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) when there is a pathogen-mediated infection associated [22, 24]. The carbohydrate recognition domain (CRD) of SP-D recognizes and binds to different receptor molecules expressed on the surface of inflammatory cells such as TLR2 [64], the myeloid differentiation factor 2 (MD-2) protein in the TLR4/MD-2 complex [65, 66] and the carbohydrate moiety of CD14 in the CD14/TLR4 complex [67], which inhibits the activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway implicated on amplifying the pro-inflammatory response [54]. DAMPs and PAMPs can also contribute to the development of inflammation in BPD by activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome [18]. It has also been shown that SP-D protects from acute lung injury by suppressing the activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome and the NF-κB pathway [68].

SP-D could also mitigate the inflammatory reactive oxygen species (ROS)-driven response observed in BPD [10, 15]. SP-D binds to the leukocyte-associated immunoglobulin-like receptor 1 (LAIR-1), a receptor in several immunocompetent cells that binds to collagen, inhibiting the production of ROS [69]. Animal models that lack SP-D (Sftpd−/−) have shown increased alveolar concentrations of ROS, confirming a role for SP-D in their modulation [70,71,72]. ROS can activate the expression of alveolar matrix proteins such as metalloproteinases (e.g. MMP-9), enhancing inflammation in BPD [24], interestingly, SP-D is able to regulate this process, decreasing the production of MMP-2 and MMP-9 by alveolar macrophages [70, 72].

It has been recently published that SP-D attenuates NETosis in human neutrophils [73], decreasing the release of NETs that also contribute to airway inflammation in BPD [19, 21]. Last, it has been shown that SP-D decreases cell apoptosis in-vitro and in-vivo [74,75,76,77], and at the same time, favors the elimination of already apoptotic cells by phagocytic cells [78].

In addition to the anti-inflammatory activity, SP-D can target microbial pathogens that colonize the lungs when sepsis and/or secondary infections contribute to inflammatory injury leading to BPD. SP-D recognizes and binds to glycosylated determinants on the surface of bacteria (e.g. lipopolysaccharide in gram negative bacteria [79, 80]), viruses (e.g. F-protein in respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) [81] or the spike-protein of SARS-CoV [82] and SARS-CoV-2 [83]) and fungi (β-glucans and mannose in the wall e.g. in Candida albicans) (interactions of SP-D with different pathogens have been reviewed in previous works: [55, 84,85,86,87,88]). This action is mediated by the carbohydrate recognition domain of SP-D and it is calcium-dependent. Binding of pathogens promotes opsonization, aggregation and uptake by phagocytic cells or clearance by the mucociliary escalator, in which higher order oligomers of SP-D (dodecamers and structured multimers or “fuzzy balls”) seem to be more effective in these lectin-mediated functions of SP-D [63, 85, 89,90,91,92] (Fig. 3). SP-D-promoted neutralization and removal of pathogens is accompanied by a decreased in the inflammatory response boosted by these microbes, since the insulting agent is being cleared or neutralized avoiding the initiation and exacerbation of the inflammatory pathways. Reduced concentrations of alveolar inflammatory cells and pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g. IL-6, TNF-α, IL-1β) have been observed in animal models for bacterial and viral respiratory infections and sepsis after treatment with exogenous SP-D, and in animals expressing SP-D versus their Sftpd−/− counterparts (lacking SP-D) [68, 81, 93,94,95,96,97]. Therefore, a similar effect could be expected in BPD patients if SP-D could promote the clearance of the pathogens that induce secondary infections and sepsis.

In vivo studies that have used different animal models to mimic BPD by exposing preterm animals to hyperoxia and/or mechanical ventilation or sepsis, have shown the important role for SP-D in preventing BPD outcome. Decreased pulmonary levels of collectins have been reported in a model of chronic lung injury induced by mechanical ventilation and oxygen, and in a model of prenatal sepsis in preterm baboons [98, 99]. In a neonatal mouse model that mimicked the hyperoxia exposure in BPD, SP-D showed a protective effect from hyperoxia by modulating the pro-inflammatory response (pro-inflammatory cytokine levels e.g. IL-6, TNF-α were reduced) and antioxidant systems [100]. Last, it has been shown that the addition of rhSP-D to a commercial surfactant inhibited the lung inflammation triggered by ventilation and oxygen administration in premature newborn lambs, while the group that received surfactant alone, without rhSP-D supplementation, showed a significant different increased inflammatory response. The treatment with rhSP-D reduced the total inflammatory cell counts in BALF, the neutrophil elastase activity in tissue and IL-8 concentration in lung [47].

SP-D in premature infants

The prematurity and underdevelopment of the lungs in preterm infants influence endogenous pulmonary SP-D concentrations and functionality. In ventilated preterm infants that received exogenous pulmonary surfactant treatment during their first week of life, low pulmonary SP-D concentrations at postnatal days 2 and 3 correlated with a worse outcome measured as supplemental oxygen needs at 28 postnatal days. Specifically, infants with low SP-D levels were still on supplemental oxygen therapy at postnatal day 28 while infants with higher SP-D levels were on room air [101]. Lower pulmonary SP-D concentrations at postnatal day 1 have been observed in preterm infants that developed chronic pulmonary disease compared to those that did not [102]. In addition to lower SP-D concentrations, SP-D function was evaluated by binding assays, showing low activity associated with a predominance of low oligomeric forms of SP-D (trimers, which have been associated with lower lectin activity of the protein) in the BALF from preterm infants that developed chronic lung disease [102]. Another study has shown that the premature lung of preterm infants responds to sepsis by increasing SP-D pulmonary levels, an effect that is not observed in the absence of sepsis onset and suggesting that SP-D is a natural tool in the response of the preterm lung to fight infection [103]. All these findings highlight the role that the decreased levels and activity of the SP-D found in the preterm lung play in the development of inflammation, infections and lung injury in this critical population.

The early administration of rhSP-D could replenish deficient endogenous SP-D levels at birth and during the first days of life, providing properly oligomerized and active SP-D (dodecamers and higher order oligomers) to protect the preterm lung from inflammation and lung injury, and also, to provide an adequate defense against infectious pathogens. SP-D also plays a role in the decrease of surfactant pool sizes after birth, converting large aggregates into small aggregates enabling proper surfactant lipids homeostasis [58]. Further research is needed to determine the specific determinants and characteristics of the pulmonary surfactant aggregates that trigger SP-D regulation of surfactant pool sizes, such as the presence of immature surfactant structures or perhaps oxidized or inactivated surfactant aggregates produced by regular breathing and maybe enhanced by inflammation.

In summary, in this section we have reviewed the actions of SP-D that could play a role in preventing BPD. Administration of rhSP-D could prevent the alveolar lung injury observed in BPD patients, mainly caused by an exacerbated inflammatory response originated by multiple factors like intrinsic lung prematurity, chorioamnionitis, postnatal sepsis, mechanical ventilation and oxygen supplementation. The inflammatory response originated by those different factors is mediated by signaling pathways where SP-D has a modulating role, at the same time, rhSP-D could promote the clearance of pathogens and intermediates that stimulate those pathways. Last, rhSP-D could facilitate normal surfactant homeostasis and protect surfactant from inactivation.

Advantages of rhSP-D therapy over other commercial or experimental drugs

Preterm infants usually require intense hospital care and high medical needs to overcome the difficulties associated with their immature organs, and to ensure proper development. Safety is a high concern when developing and testing new investigational therapies in this preterm population, since they are more fragile than infants and adults. Recombinant human SP-D is a recombinant version of a naturally occurring protein in the human lung that is already present in the lungs of preterm infants at birth, but in a deficient concentration and not in a fully functional form. Since SP-D is a natural occurring protein in the human lung instead of a synthetic artificial drug, the administration of rhSP-D as a therapy to prevent BPD should not bring any significant clinical safety and toxicology concerns.

Finding appropriate delivery techniques is another difficulty that could be encountered to administer a therapy that targets the lungs of the preterm infants. Babies at risk of BPD frequently need exogenous pulmonary surfactant therapy as part of their standard treatment, which is administered by intratracheal instillation with a catheter inserted through the endotracheal tube. This route of delivery requires either intubation of the infant or using less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) techniques that use a less invasive thin and soft catheter [104]. Administration of rhSP-D in different animal models, including one for BPD in preterm lambs, has successfully been performed by intratracheal instillation, obtaining a good clinical outcome and without problems associated to the administration route [47, 95, 96]. Therefore, the same delivery techniques that are already in place to administer exogenous pulmonary surfactant to preterm babies could be potentially use for the delivery of rhSP-D. It has been reported that SP-D has a half-life of 13 h in lungs after intratracheal administration to adult mice [105] and a half-life of 9 h in premature lungs of 10-day old rats with the same administration route [106], therefore, the half-life of the protein would be appropriate to allow for a convenient daily dose regimen for administration. The volume of administration required could be a limiting factor since lungs do not tolerate high volumes of liquid, however, surfactant studies suggest that volumes as high as 4 mL/kg body weight per dose are well tolerated. In addition, volume limitations could be overcome by adjusting the concentration of the clinical presentation of rhSP-D to increase the protein and reduce the volume. The non-toxic and safe profile of intratracheal dosed rhSP-D was recently shown in a premature lung model using 10-day old rats [106]. Repetitive intratracheal administrations of rhSP-D at a dose 8 mg/kg during 14 days were well tolerated by the rats without evidence of an inflammatory response or histological signs of lung toxicity [106]. Besides intratracheal administration, other delivery techniques could be explored. A recent in-vitro study has shown that exogenous pulmonary surfactant could facilitate the distribution of rhSP-D. The study demonstrated that pulmonary surfactant is able to transport rhSP-D long distances over air–liquid-like interfaces, which may help rhSP-D to reach to alveoli [107]. It has beenpublished that nanoparticles composed of PLGA (poly lactic acid-co-glycolic acid) were applied as a vehicle to deliver rhSP-D to the lung of mice without exhibiting any associated cell toxicity and providing a sustained rhSP-D released in time that could prevent repetitive doses [108]. Formulations of lyophilized rhSP-D could be developed in the future, maybe enabling the use of nebulizers to administer rhSP-D by nebulization.

The challenge of manufacturing rhSP-D at commercial scale

A major obstacle in the development of SP-D as a therapeutic over the years has been the complexity of producing and manufacturing a recombinant version of SP-D at clinical scales. As we mention earlier, human native SP-D is naturally assembled as different oligomeric forms: trimers, hexamers, dodecamers and high order oligomers variable in size [61] (Fig. 2). The dodecamer of the protein has a molecular weight of 520 kDa with a cross-like shape in which the length of the enclosed hexamers is ~ 136 nm, therefore, SP-D is a large protein and structurally far from a globular assembly [60]. In addition, when the protein is synthesized by type II pneumocytes, it undergoes post-translational modifications like hydroxylation and glycosylation processes that only mammalian cell systems can accurately mimic when the protein is produced as a recombinant version in the lab [109, 110]. Unfortunately, mammalian cell systems usually produce low recombinant protein yields compared to bioengineering systems that use other organisms like bacteria such as Escherichia coli, or fungi such as Pichia pastoris. Recombinant SP-D has been produced in different systems, including mammalian cells (CHO-K1, HEK-293), bacteria (Escherichia coli) and fungi (Pichia pastoris). Currently, mammalian cells are the only system that produced full length, post-translationally modified, and fully oligomerized rhSP-D [111]. Some studies have engineered a truncated version of SP-D (rfhSP-D) of 60 kDa that contains a trimeric neck and CRD, including a short region of the collagen domain (8 triplets) [112, 113]. The main advantage of this truncated version is that protein production using a bacterial system is easier and facilitates high yields, however, the protein only form trimers. While these rfhSP-D trimers still exhibit carbohydrate binding activity and some anti-inflammatory properties of SP-D, they are less active and potent than the dodecamers and higher order oligomers of the full-length protein. Therefore, a higher protein concentration of the rfhSP-D could be needed for adequate therapeutic activity [112, 114,115,116]. In addition, some SP-D mediated functions require the complex full length protein assembly (dodecamers) such as aggregation of pathogens and regulation of pulmonary surfactant homeostasis, in which the trimeric form has failed to perform these functions [63, 91]. Therefore, the rhSP-D produced has to be characterized with the appropriate quality controls to ensure protein structure, distribution of oligomeric forms, stability and biological activity are maintained during manufacturing, storage and administration, which in the case of rhSP-D with its particular structure and dynamic character is challenging.

Despite these difficulties, there are two biotech companies currently working on producing rhSP-D (Airway Therapeutics Inc., U.S.A.) or the truncated version rfhSP-D (Trimunocor, U.K.) with the aim of using them at clinical trials targeting BPD. Trimunocor is a biotech company based in Hertfordshire (United Kingdom) that is developing and manufacturing the recombinant trimeric fragment of SP-D (rfhSP-D) using E.coli as a production system. Trimunocor is in the GMP manufacturing process of CARE-PD as per the company’s website (www.trimunocor.com). Airway Therapeutics Inc., a biotech company based in Cincinnati and Atlanta (U.S.A.) is developing a full length recombinant human SP-D (rhSP-D) in a human cell line GlycoExpress (GEX®) developed by Glycotope GmbH (Germany). This is a human cell line that is capable of producing a full length glycosylated rhSP-D. Airway Therapeutics is planning on using rhSP-D as preventive treatment for BPD with entry into clinical studies in 2021 (as per www.clinicaltrials.gov and per Airway Therapeutics Inc. website: www.airwaytherapeutics.com).

Conclusions

BPD is a complex and multifactorial syndrome in which lung inflammation is the leading factor that induces lung injury and results in a deficient gas exchange in the lungs. There are no effective therapies that target the multifactorial components in BPD to date and only discrete effects have been shown by corticosteroids, vitamin A and caffeine in reducing some of the BPD outcomes. Recombinant human SP-D (rhSP-D) could be a potential successful biologic therapy for BPD that could target several pathological mechanisms contributing to BPD development. RhSP-D has a high safety profile that mimics a native protein that is normally present in the lung but deficient in preterm infants. The innate immune character of SP-D provides a multitarget response that could act on different factors that contribute to inflammation and injury of the BPD lung, positioning rhSP-D as a multi-target therapy to prevent and treat BPD. Multiple studies have suggested and supported the therapeutic potential of SP-D and recent advances in the manufacturing of this protein may finally lead to the testing of this novel agent in the near future.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

BPD:

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia

CRD:

Carbohydrate recognition domain

CT:

Computerized tomography

DAMPs:

Damage-associated molecular patterns

GA:

Gestational age, IGF-1: insulin like growth factor 1

IUGR:

Intrauterine growth restriction

LISA:

Less invasive surfactant administration

LPS:

Lipopolysaccharide

NETs:

Neutrophil extracellular traps

NICHD:

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development

PAMPs:

Pathogen-associated molecular patterns

PDA:

(Patent ductus arteriosus

PLGA:

Poly lactic acid-co-glycolic acid

PMA:

Postmenstrual age

rhSP-D:

Recombinant human surfactant protein D

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

SP-D:

Surfactant protein D

UTE-MRI:

Ultrashort echo time magnetic resonance imagining

References

  1. 1.

    Northway WH Jr, Rosan RC, Porter DY. Pulmonary disease following respirator therapy of hyaline-membrane disease Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. N Engl J Med. 1967;276:357–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Thebaud B, Goss KN, Laughon M, Whitsett JA, Abman SH, Steinhorn RH, Aschner JL, Davis PG, McGrath-Morrow SA, Soll RF, Jobe AH. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019;5:78.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Bell EF, Walsh MC, Carlo WA, Shankaran S, Laptook AR, Sanchez PJ, Van Meurs KP, Wyckoff M, et al. Trends in Care Practices, Morbidity, and Mortality of Extremely Preterm Neonates, 1993–2012. JAMA. 2015;314:1039–51.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Jobe AH, Bancalari E. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;163:1723–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Jensen EA, Dysart K, Gantz MG, McDonald S, Bamat NA, Keszler M, Kirpalani H, Laughon MM, Poindexter BB, Duncan AF, et al. The Diagnosis of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in very preterm infants. An evidence-based approach. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;200:751–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Anderson PJ, Doyle LW. Neurodevelopmental outcome of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Semin Perinatol. 2006;30:227–32.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Whitsett JA, Wert SE, Trapnell BC. Genetic disorders influencing lung formation and function at birth. Hum Mol Genet. 2004;13:R207-215.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Smith LJ, McKay KO, van Asperen PP, Selvadurai H, Fitzgerald DA. Normal development of the lung and premature birth. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2010;11:135–42.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Jobe AH. Mechanisms of lung injury and bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Am J Perinatol. 2016;33:1076–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kalikkot Thekkeveedu R, Guaman MC, Shivanna B. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a review of pathogenesis and pathophysiology. Respir Med. 2017;132:170–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Kallapur SG, Presicce P, Rueda CM, Jobe AH, Chougnet CA. Fetal immune response to chorioamnionitis. Semin Reprod Med. 2014;32:56–67.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kim CJ, Romero R, Chaemsaithong P, Chaiyasit N, Yoon BH, Kim YM. Acute chorioamnionitis and funisitis: definition, pathologic features, and clinical significance. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213:S29-52.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Salminen A, Paananen R, Vuolteenaho R, Metsola J, Ojaniemi M, Autio-Harmainen H, Hallman M. Maternal endotoxin-induced preterm birth in mice: fetal responses in toll-like receptors, collectins, and cytokines. Pediatr Res. 2008;63:280–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kuypers E, Collins JJ, Kramer BW, Ofman G, Nitsos I, Pillow JJ, Polglase GR, Kemp MW, Newnham JP, Gavilanes AW, et al. Intra-amniotic LPS and antenatal betamethasone: inflammation and maturation in preterm lamb lungs. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2012;302:L380-389.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Perrone S, Tataranno ML, Buonocore G. Oxidative stress and bronchopulmonary dysplasia. J Clin Neonatol. 2012;1:109–14.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Speer CP. Pulmonary inflammation and bronchopulmonary dysplasia. J Perinatol. 2006;26(Suppl 1):S57-62.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Prince LR, Maxwell NC, Gill SK, Dockrell DH, Sabroe I, McGreal EP, Kotecha S, Whyte MK. Macrophage phenotype is associated with disease severity in preterm infants with chronic lung disease. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e103059.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Liao J, Kapadia VS, Brown LS, Cheong N, Longoria C, Mija D, Ramgopal M, Mirpuri J, McCurnin DC, Savani RC. The NLRP3 inflammasome is critically involved in the development of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Nat Commun. 2015;6:8977.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Yildiz C, Palaniyar N, Otulakowski G, Khan MA, Post M, Kuebler WM, Tanswell K, Belcastro R, Masood A, Engelberts D, Kavanagh BP. Mechanical ventilation induces neutrophil extracellular trap formation. Anesthesiology. 2015;122:864–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Shahzad T, Radajewski S, Chao CM, Bellusci S, Ehrhardt H. Pathogenesis of bronchopulmonary dysplasia: when inflammation meets organ development. Mol Cell Pediatr. 2016;3:23.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Sun Y, Chen C, Zhang X, Wang S, Zhu R, Zhou A, Chen S, Feng J. Heparin improves alveolarization and vascular development in hyperoxia-induced bronchopulmonary dysplasia by inhibiting neutrophil extracellular traps. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2020;522:33–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ibrahim J, Garantziotis S, Savani RC. Chapter 9—the inflammation superhighway: tolls, signals, and pathways to bronchopulmonary dysplasia. In: Kallapur SG, Pryhuber GS, editors. Updates on neonatal chronic lung disease. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2020. p. 131–50.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Naik AS, Kallapur SG, Bachurski CJ, Jobe AH, Michna J, Kramer BW, Ikegami M. Effects of ventilation with different positive end-expiratory pressures on cytokine expression in the preterm lamb lung. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;164:494–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Balany J, Bhandari V. Understanding the Impact of Infection, Inflammation, and Their Persistence in the Pathogenesis of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia. Front Med (Lausanne). 2015;2:90.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Lahra MM, Beeby PJ, Jeffery HE. Intrauterine inflammation, neonatal sepsis, and chronic lung disease: a 13-year hospital cohort study. Pediatrics. 2009;123:1314–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Klinger G, Levy I, Sirota L, Boyko V, Lerner-Geva L, Reichman B, Israel Neonatal N. Outcome of early-onset sepsis in a national cohort of very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 2010;125:e736-740.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Bonadies L, Zaramella P, Porzionato A, Perilongo G, Muraca M, Baraldi E. Present and future of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. J Clin Med. 2020;9:1539.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Jung E, Lee BS. Late-onset sepsis as a risk factor for bronchopulmonary dysplasia in extremely low birth weight infants: a nationwide cohort study. Sci Rep. 2019;9:15448.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Hahn AD, Higano NS, Walkup LL, Thomen RP, Cao X, Merhar SL, Tkach JA, Woods JC, Fain SB. Pulmonary MRI of neonates in the intensive care unit using 3D ultrashort echo time and a small footprint MRI system. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017;45:463–71.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Higano NS, Spielberg DR, Fleck RJ, Schapiro AH, Walkup LL, Hahn AD, Tkach JA, Kingma PS, Merhar SL, Fain SB, Woods JC. Neonatal pulmonary magnetic resonance imaging of bronchopulmonary dysplasia predicts short-term clinical outcomes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;198:1302–11.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Gouwens KR, Higano NS, Marks KT, Stimpfl JN, Hysinger EB, Woods JC, Kingma PS. MRI evaluation of regional lung tidal volumes in severe neonatal bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202001-0213OC.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Seger N, Soll R. Animal derived surfactant extract for treatment of respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007836.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Soll R, Ozek E. Multiple versus single doses of exogenous surfactant for the prevention or treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000141.pub2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Echaide M, Autilio C, Arroyo R, Perez-Gil J. Restoring pulmonary surfactant membranes and films at the respiratory surface. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2017;1859:1725–39.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Hwang JS, Rehan VK. Recent advances in bronchopulmonary dysplasia: pathophysiology, prevention, and treatment. Lung. 2018;196:129–38.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Laughon M, Bose C, Moya F, Aschner J, Donn SM, Morabito C, Cummings JJ, Segal R, Guardia C, Liu G, Surfaxin Study G. A pilot randomized, controlled trial of later treatment with a peptide-containing, synthetic surfactant for the prevention of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Pediatrics. 2009;123:89–96.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Principi N, Di Pietro GM, Esposito S. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia: clinical aspects and preventive and therapeutic strategies. J Transl Med. 2018;16:36.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Baud O, Maury L, Lebail F, Ramful D, El Moussawi F, Nicaise C, Zupan-Simunek V, Coursol A, Beuchee A, Bolot P, et al. Effect of early low-dose hydrocortisone on survival without bronchopulmonary dysplasia in extremely preterm infants (PREMILOC): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, randomised trial. Lancet. 2016;387:1827–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Baud O, Trousson C, Biran V, Leroy E, Mohamed D, Alberti C, Group PT. Association between early low-dose hydrocortisone therapy in extremely preterm neonates and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years of age. JAMA. 2017;317:1329–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Yeh TF, Chen CM, Wu SY, Husan Z, Li TC, Hsieh WS, Tsai CH, Lin HC. Intratracheal administration of budesonide/surfactant to prevent bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;193:86–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Roberts JK, Stockmann C, Dahl MJ, Albertine KH, Egan E, Lin Z, Reilly CA, Ballard PL, Ballard RA, Ward RM. Pharmacokinetics of budesonide administered with surfactant in premature lambs: implications for neonatal clinical trials. Curr Clin Pharmacol. 2016;11:53–61.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Schmidt B, Roberts RS, Davis P, Doyle LW, Barrington KJ, Ohlsson A, Solimano A, Tin W. Caffeine for apnea of prematurity trial G: caffeine therapy for apnea of prematurity. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:2112–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Dobson NR, Patel RM, Smith PB, Kuehn DR, Clark J, Vyas-Read S, Herring A, Laughon MM, Carlton D, Hunt CE. Trends in caffeine use and association between clinical outcomes and timing of therapy in very low birth weight infants. J Pediatr. 2014;164(992–998):e993.

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Tyson JE, Wright LL, Oh W, Kennedy KA, Mele L, Ehrenkranz RA, Stoll BJ, Lemons JA, Stevenson DK, Bauer CR, et al. Vitamin A supplementation for extremely-low-birth-weight infants. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1962–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Darlow BA, Graham PJ, Rojas-Reyes MX. Vitamin A supplementation to prevent mortality and short- and long-term morbidity in very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000501.pub4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Sahni M, Bhandari V. Recent advances in understanding and management of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. F1000Res. 2020;9:703.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Sato A, Whitsett JA, Scheule RK, Ikegami M. Surfactant protein-D inhibits lung inflammation caused by ventilation in premature newborn lambs. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;181:1098–105.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Stahlman MT, Gray ME, Hull WM, Whitsett JA. Immunolocalization of surfactant protein-D (SP-D) in human fetal, newborn, and adult tissues. J Histochem Cytochem. 2002;50:651–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Herias MV, Hogenkamp A, van Asten AJ, Tersteeg MH, van Eijk M, Haagsman HP. Expression sites of the collectin SP-D suggest its importance in first line host defence: power of combining in situ hybridization, RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry. Mol Immunol. 2007;44:3324–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Sorensen GL, Husby S, Holmskov U. Surfactant protein A and surfactant protein D variation in pulmonary disease. Immunobiology. 2007;212:381–416.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Kingma PS, Whitsett JA. In defense of the lung: surfactant protein A and surfactant protein D. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2006;6:277–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Kendall M, Ding P, Mackay RM, Deb R, McKenzie Z, Kendall K, Madsen J, Clark H. Surfactant protein D (SP-D) alters cellular uptake of particles and nanoparticles. Nanotoxicology. 2013;7:963–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Ruge CA, Schaefer UF, Herrmann J, Kirch J, Canadas O, Echaide M, Perez-Gil J, Casals C, Muller R, Lehr CM. The interplay of lung surfactant proteins and lipids assimilates the macrophage clearance of nanoparticles. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e40775.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Wright JR. Immunoregulatory functions of surfactant proteins. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005;5:58–68.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Sorensen GL. Surfactant protein D in respiratory and non-respiratory diseases. Front Med (Lausanne). 2018;5:18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Korfhagen TR, Sheftelyevich V, Burhans MS, Bruno MD, Ross GF, Wert SE, Stahlman MT, Jobe AH, Ikegami M, Whitsett JA, Fisher JH. Surfactant protein-D regulates surfactant phospholipid homeostasis in vivo. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:28438–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Ikegami M, Na CL, Korfhagen TR, Whitsett JA. Surfactant protein D influences surfactant ultrastructure and uptake by alveolar type II cells. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2005;288:L552-561.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Ikegami M, Grant S, Korfhagen T, Scheule RK, Whitsett JA. Surfactant protein-D regulates the postnatal maturation of pulmonary surfactant lipid pool sizes. J Appl Physiol. 1985;2009(106):1545–52.

    Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Crouch E, Persson A, Chang D, Heuser J. Molecular structure of pulmonary surfactant protein D (SP-D). J Biol Chem. 1994;269:17311–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Arroyo R, Martin-Gonzalez A, Echaide M, Jain A, Brondyk WH, Rosenbaum J, Moreno-Herrero F, Perez-Gil J. Supramolecular assembly of human pulmonary surfactant protein SP-D. J Mol Biol. 2018;430:1495–509.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Arroyo R, Echaide M, Wilmanowski RM, Martin-Gonzalez A, Batllori E, Galindo A, Rosenbaum JS, Moreno-Herrero F, Kingma PS, Perez-Gil J. Structure and activity of human surfactant protein sp-d from different natural sources. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.00007.2020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Hartshorn K, Chang D, Rust K, White M, Heuser J, Crouch E. Interactions of recombinant human pulmonary surfactant protein D and SP-D multimers with influenza A. Am J Physiol. 1996;271:L753-762.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Arroyo R, Echaide M, Moreno-Herrero F, Perez-Gil J, Kingma PS. Functional characterization of the different oligomeric forms of human surfactant protein SP-D. Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteom. 2020;1868:140436.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Ohya M, Nishitani C, Sano H, Yamada C, Mitsuzawa H, Shimizu T, Saito T, Smith K, Crouch E, Kuroki Y. Human pulmonary surfactant protein D binds the extracellular domains of Toll-like receptors 2 and 4 through the carbohydrate recognition domain by a mechanism different from its binding to phosphatidylinositol and lipopolysaccharide. Biochemistry. 2006;45:8657–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Yamazoe M, Nishitani C, Takahashi M, Katoh T, Ariki S, Shimizu T, Mitsuzawa H, Sawada K, Voelker DR, Takahashi H, Kuroki Y. Pulmonary surfactant protein D inhibits lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced inflammatory cell responses by altering LPS binding to its receptors. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:35878–88.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Nie X, Nishitani C, Yamazoe M, Ariki S, Takahashi M, Shimizu T, Mitsuzawa H, Sawada K, Smith K, Crouch E, et al. Pulmonary surfactant protein D binds MD-2 through the carbohydrate recognition domain. Biochemistry. 2008;47:12878–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Sano H, Chiba H, Iwaki D, Sohma H, Voelker DR, Kuroki Y. Surfactant proteins A and D bind CD14 by different mechanisms. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:22442–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Yu J, Ni L, Zhang X, Zhang J, Abdel-Razek O, Wang G. Surfactant protein D dampens lung injury by suppressing NLRP3 inflammasome activation and NF-kappaB signaling in acute pancreatitis. Shock. 2019;51:557–68.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Olde Nordkamp MJ, van Eijk M, Urbanus RT, Bont L, Haagsman HP, Meyaard L. Leukocyte-associated Ig-like receptor-1 is a novel inhibitory receptor for surfactant protein D. J Leukoc Biol. 2014;96:105–11.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Wert SE, Yoshida M, LeVine AM, Ikegami M, Jones T, Ross GF, Fisher JH, Korfhagen TR, Whitsett JA. Increased metalloproteinase activity, oxidant production, and emphysema in surfactant protein D gene-inactivated mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:5972–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Bridges JP, Davis HW, Damodarasamy M, Kuroki Y, Howles G, Hui DY, McCormack FX. Pulmonary surfactant proteins A and D are potent endogenous inhibitors of lipid peroxidation and oxidative cellular injury. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:38848–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Yoshida M, Korfhagen TR, Whitsett JA. Surfactant protein D regulates NF-kappa B and matrix metalloproteinase production in alveolar macrophages via oxidant-sensitive pathways. J Immunol. 2001;166:7514–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Arroyo R, Khan MA, Echaide M, Perez-Gil J, Palaniyar N. SP-D attenuates LPS-induced formation of human neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), protecting pulmonary surfactant inactivation by NETs. Commun Biol. 2019;2:470.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Djiadeu P, Farmakovski N, Azzouz D, Kotra LP, Sweezey N, Palaniyar N. Surfactant protein D regulates caspase-8-mediated cascade of the intrinsic pathway of apoptosis while promoting bleb formation. Mol Immunol. 2017;92:190–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Djiadeu P, Kotra LP, Sweezey N, Palaniyar N. Surfactant protein D delays Fas- and TRAIL-mediated extrinsic pathway of apoptosis in T cells. Apoptosis. 2017;22:730–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Zhou Y, Ming J, Li Y, Du X, Deng M, He B, Zhou J, Wang G, Liu S. Surfactant protein D attenuates nitric oxide-stimulated apoptosis in rat chondrocyte by suppressing p38 MAPK signaling. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;495:526–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Du J, Abdel-Razek O, Shi Q, Hu F, Ding G, Cooney RN, Wang G. Surfactant protein D attenuates acute lung and kidney injuries in pneumonia-induced sepsis through modulating apoptosis, inflammation and NF-kappaB signaling. Sci Rep. 2018;8:15393.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Vandivier RW, Ogden CA, Fadok VA, Hoffmann PR, Brown KK, Botto M, Walport MJ, Fisher JH, Henson PM, Greene KE. Role of surfactant proteins A, D, and C1q in the clearance of apoptotic cells in vivo and in vitro: calreticulin and CD91 as a common collectin receptor complex. J Immunol. 2002;169:3978–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Kuan SF, Rust K, Crouch E. Interactions of surfactant protein D with bacterial lipopolysaccharides. Surfactant protein D is an Escherichia coli-binding protein in bronchoalveolar lavage. J Clin Invest. 1992;90:97–106.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    van Rozendaal BA, van de Lest CH, van Eijk M, van Golde LM, Voorhout WF, van Helden HP, Haagsman HP. Aerosolized endotoxin is immediately bound by pulmonary surfactant protein D in vivo. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999;1454:261–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    LeVine AM, Elliott J, Whitsett JA, Srikiatkhachorn A, Crouch E, DeSilva N, Korfhagen T. Surfactant protein-d enhances phagocytosis and pulmonary clearance of respiratory syncytial virus. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2004;31:193–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Leth-Larsen R, Zhong F, Chow VT, Holmskov U, Lu J. The SARS coronavirus spike glycoprotein is selectively recognized by lung surfactant protein D and activates macrophages. Immunobiology. 2007;212:201–11.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Arroyo R, Grant SN, Kingma PS. Late breaking abstract—the innate immune collectin surfactant protein SP-D binds to SARS-CoV-2 spike-protein. Eur Respir J. 2020;56:1055.

    Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Crouch EC. Structure, biologic properties, and expression of surfactant protein D (SP-D). Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998;1408:278–89.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Crouch EC. Surfactant protein-D and pulmonary host defense. Respir Res. 2000;1:93–108.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Kishore U, Greenhough TJ, Waters P, Shrive AK, Ghai R, Kamran MF, Bernal AL, Reid KB, Madan T, Chakraborty T. Surfactant proteins SP-A and SP-D: structure, function and receptors. Mol Immunol. 2006;43:1293–315.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Seaton BA, Crouch EC, McCormack FX, Head JF, Hartshorn KL, Mendelsohn R. Review: Structural determinants of pattern recognition by lung collectins. Innate Immun. 2010;16:143–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Canadas O, Olmeda B, Alonso A, Perez-Gil J. Lipid-protein and protein-protein interactions in the pulmonary surfactant system and their role in lung homeostasis. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:3708.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Hartshorn KL, Crouch E, White MR, Colamussi ML, Kakkanatt A, Tauber B, Shepherd V, Sastry KN. Pulmonary surfactant proteins A and D enhance neutrophil uptake of bacteria. Am J Physiol. 1998;274:L958-969.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Leth-Larsen R, Garred P, Jensenius H, Meschi J, Hartshorn K, Madsen J, Tornoe I, Madsen HO, Sorensen G, Crouch E, Holmskov U. A common polymorphism in the SFTPD gene influences assembly, function, and concentration of surfactant protein D. J Immunol. 2005;174:1532–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Kingma PS, Zhang L, Ikegami M, Hartshorn K, McCormack FX, Whitsett JA. Correction of pulmonary abnormalities in Sftpd-/- mice requires the collagenous domain of surfactant protein D. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:24496–505.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Watson A, Phipps MJS, Clark HW, Skylaris CK, Madsen J. Surfactant Proteins A and D: Trimerized Innate Immunity Proteins with an Affinity for Viral Fusion Proteins. J Innate Immun. 2019;11:13–28.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    LeVine AM, Whitsett JA, Gwozdz JA, Richardson TR, Fisher JH, Burhans MS, Korfhagen TR. Distinct effects of surfactant protein A or D deficiency during bacterial infection on the lung. J Immunol. 2000;165:3934–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    LeVine AM, Whitsett JA, Hartshorn KL, Crouch EC, Korfhagen TR. Surfactant protein D enhances clearance of influenza A virus from the lung in vivo. J Immunol. 2001;167:5868–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Ikegami M, Carter K, Bishop K, Yadav A, Masterjohn E, Brondyk W, Scheule RK, Whitsett JA. Intratracheal recombinant surfactant protein D prevents endotoxin shock in the newborn preterm lamb. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;173:1342–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Ikegami M, Scoville EA, Grant S, Korfhagen T, Brondyk W, Scheule RK, Whitsett JA. Surfactant protein-D and surfactant inhibit endotoxin-induced pulmonary inflammation. Chest. 2007;132:1447–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    King BA, Kingma PS. Surfactant protein D deficiency increases lung injury during endotoxemia. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2011;44:709–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Awasthi S, Coalson JJ, Crouch E, Yang F, King RJ. Surfactant proteins A and D in premature baboons with chronic lung injury (Bronchopulmonary dysplasia). Evidence for an inhibition of secretion. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;160:942–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Awasthi S, Coalson JJ, Yoder BA, Crouch E, King RJ. Deficiencies in lung surfactant proteins A and D are associated with lung infection in very premature neonatal baboons. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;163:389–97.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Jain D, Atochina-Vasserman EN, Tomer Y, Kadire H, Beers MF. Surfactant protein D protects against acute hyperoxic lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;178:805–13.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Beresford MW, Shaw NJ. Bronchoalveolar lavage surfactant protein a, B, and d concentrations in preterm infants ventilated for respiratory distress syndrome receiving natural and synthetic surfactants. Pediatr Res. 2003;53:663–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Kotecha S, Davies PL, Clark HW, McGreal EP. Increased prevalence of low oligomeric state surfactant protein D with restricted lectin activity in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from preterm infants. Thorax. 2013;68:460–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Mackay RA, Townsend JP, Calvert J, Anthony M, Wilkinson AR, Postle AD, Clark HW, Todd DA. Increased surfactant protein-D levels in the airways of preterm neonates with sepsis indicated responses to infectious challenges. Acta Paediatr. 2019;108:870–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Jobe AH. Why, when, and how to give surfactant. Pediatr Res. 2019;86:15–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Ikegami M, Whitsett JA, Jobe A, Ross G, Fisher J, Korfhagen T. Surfactant metabolism in SP-D gene-targeted mice. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2000;279:L468-476.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Arroyo R, Grant SN, Gouwens KR, Miller DM, Kingma PS. Evaluation of recombinant human SP-D in the rat premature lung model. Ann Anat. 2021;235:151670.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Garcia-Mouton C, Hidalgo A, Arroyo R, Echaide M, Cruz A, Perez-Gil J. Pulmonary surfactant and drug delivery: an interface-assisted carrier to deliver surfactant protein SP-D into the airways. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:613276.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Cohen SA, Kingma PS, Whitsett JA, Goldbart R, Traitel T, Kost J. SP-D loaded PLGA nanoparticles as drug delivery system for prevention and treatment of premature infant’s lung diseases. Int J Pharm. 2020;585:119387.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Crouch E, Chang D, Rust K, Persson A, Heuser J. Recombinant pulmonary surfactant protein D. Post-translational modification and molecular assembly. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:15808–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Brown-Augsburger P, Chang D, Rust K, Crouch EC. Biosynthesis of surfactant protein D. Contributions of conserved NH2-terminal cysteine residues and collagen helix formation to assembly and secretion. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:18912–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Salgado D, Fischer R, Schillberg S, Twyman RM, Rasche S. Comparative evaluation of heterologous production systems for recombinant pulmonary surfactant protein D. Front Immunol. 2014;5:623.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Strong P, Reid KB, Clark H. Intranasal delivery of a truncated recombinant human SP-D is effective at down-regulating allergic hypersensitivity in mice sensitized to allergens of Aspergillus fumigatus. Clin Exp Immunol. 2002;130:19–24.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Watson A, Sorensen GL, Holmskov U, Whitwell HJ, Madsen J, Clark H. Generation of novel trimeric fragments of human SP-A and SP-D after recombinant soluble expression in E. coli. Immunobiology. 2020;225:151953.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Strong P, Townsend P, Mackay R, Reid KB, Clark HW. A recombinant fragment of human SP-D reduces allergic responses in mice sensitized to house dust mite allergens. Clin Exp Immunol. 2003;134:181–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Tecle T, White MR, Sorensen G, Gantz D, Kacak N, Holmskov U, Smith K, Crouch EC, Hartshorn KL. Critical role for cross-linking of trimeric lectin domains of surfactant protein D in antiviral activity against influenza A virus. Biochem J. 2008;412:323–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    White M, Kingma P, Tecle T, Kacak N, Linders B, Heuser J, Crouch E, Hartshorn K. Multimerization of surfactant protein D, but not its collagen domain, is required for antiviral and opsonic activities related to influenza virus. J Immunol. 2008;181:7936–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Jesus Perez-Gil from University Complutense (Madrid, Spain) for providing the AFM images of rhSP-D. Anna Kohrs from Cincinnati Children’s Hospital (Cincinnati, OH, U.S.A.) for helping with the schematic drawings.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RA gathered data and drafted the manuscript. PSK provided overall guidance on the project. All authors have reviewed the manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul S. Kingma.

Ethics declarations

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Paul S. Kingma is a paid employee for Airway Therapeutics Inc. which is developing SP-D as a human therapeutic agent. Raquel Arroyo is paid as part-time consultant for Airway Therapeutics Inc.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arroyo, R., Kingma, P.S. Surfactant protein D and bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a new way to approach an old problem. Respir Res 22, 141 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-021-01738-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD)
  • Surfactant Protein D (SP-D)
  • Recombinant human SP-D (rhSP-D)
  • Alveolar arrest
  • Lung inflammation