Skip to main content
Download PDF

Nintedanib and immunomodulatory therapies in progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases

Respiratory Research volume 22, Article number: 84 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

In the INBUILD trial in patients with chronic fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) and a progressive phenotype, nintedanib reduced the rate of ILD progression with adverse events that were manageable for most patients. We investigated the potential impact of immunomodulatory therapies on the efficacy and safety of nintedanib.

Methods

Subjects with fibrosing ILDs other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, who had shown progression of ILD within the prior 24 months despite management in clinical practice, were randomized to receive nintedanib or placebo. Certain immunomodulatory therapies were restricted for the first 6 months. We analyzed post-hoc the rate of decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) over 52 weeks in subgroups by glucocorticoid use at baseline and in analyses excluding subjects or FVC measurements taken after initiation of restricted immunomodulatory or antifibrotic therapies.

Results

Of 663 subjects, 361 (54.4%) were taking glucocorticoids at baseline (353 at a dose of ≤ 20 mg/day). In the placebo group, the adjusted rate of decline in FVC (mL/year) over 52 weeks was numerically greater in subjects taking than not taking glucocorticoids at baseline (− 206.4 [SE 20.2] vs − 165.8 [21.9]). The difference between the nintedanib and placebo groups was 133.3 (95% CI 76.6, 190.0) mL/year in subjects taking glucocorticoids at baseline and 76.1 (15.0, 137.2) mL/year in subjects who were not (interaction P = 0.18). The effect of nintedanib on reducing the rate of FVC decline in analyses excluding subjects or measurements taken after initiation of restricted immunomodulatory or antifibrotic therapies was similar to the primary analysis. The adverse event profile of nintedanib was similar between subjects who did and did not use prohibited or restricted therapies at baseline or during treatment with trial drug.

Conclusions

In patients with progressive fibrosing ILDs, the effect of nintedanib on reducing FVC decline was not influenced by the use of immunomodulatory therapies. Nintedanib can be used in combination with immunomodulatory therapies in patients with progressive fibrosing ILDs.

Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02999178. Registered 21 December 2016, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02999178

Introduction

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is, by definition, a progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (ILD) [1]. In addition to IPF, a proportion of patients with other chronic fibrosing ILDs develop a progressive phenotype characterized by increasing fibrosis on high resolution computed tomography (HRCT), worsening of lung function, symptoms and quality of life, and early mortality [2,3,4,5].

Immunosuppressants are the mainstay of treatment for autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic sclerosis (SSc). Immunomodulatory medications such as glucocorticoids are also frequently used in the treatment of other non-IPF ILDs such as hypersensitivity pneumonitis, idiopathic non-specific interstitial pneumonia (iNSIP) and unclassifiable idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP) [6,7,8].

In the INBUILD trial in subjects with non-IPF chronic fibrosing ILDs that were progressive despite management deemed appropriate in clinical practice, nintedanib slowed the progression of fibrosing ILD, as measured by the annual rate of decline in forced vital capacity (FVC), both in the overall population and in the co-primary population of subjects with a usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP)-like fibrotic pattern on HRCT [9]. Although the INBUILD trial was not powered to study individual ILDs, subgroup analyses suggested that nintedanib had a consistent effect on FVC decline across diagnostic groups [10].

We investigated the therapies that are often used to treat non-IPF ILDs in clinical practice that were used at baseline and during the INBUILD trial, and the potential impact of these therapies on the treatment effect of nintedanib.

Methods

Trial design

The INBUILD trial design has been described and the protocol is publicly available [9]. Briefly, subjects had a physician-diagnosed chronic fibrosing ILD other than IPF, reticular abnormality with traction bronchiectasis (with or without honeycombing) of > 10% extent on HRCT, FVC ≥ 45% predicted and diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLco) ≥ 30–< 80% predicted. Subjects met one of the following criteria for ILD progression within the 24 months before screening, despite management deemed appropriate in clinical practice: relative decline in FVC ≥ 10% predicted; relative decline in FVC ≥ 5–< 10% predicted and worsened respiratory symptoms; relative decline in FVC ≥ 5–< 10% predicted and increased extent of fibrosis on HRCT; worsened respiratory symptoms and increased extent of fibrosis on HRCT [9]. Subjects were randomized to receive nintedanib 150 mg bid or placebo, stratified by fibrotic pattern on HRCT (UIP-like fibrotic pattern or other fibrotic patterns) [9]. The protocol was approved by an independent ethics committee or institutional review board at each participating center (additional details can be found in Additional file 1: Appendix S1).

Restricted and prohibited immunomodulatory and antifibrotic therapies

Restricted therapies were azathioprine, cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, oral glucocorticoids > 20 mg/day, or the combination of oral glucocorticoids, azathioprine and N-acetylcysteine (not permitted within 4 weeks of randomization); cyclophosphamide (not permitted within 8 weeks of randomization); and rituximab (not permitted within 6 months of randomization). Investigators were asked not to consider patients with autoimmune disease that was managed using any of these restricted therapies for participation in the trial. Patients who took a restricted therapy to treat their ILD, and whose ILD was progressing, could participate in the trial if the restricted therapy was discontinued. Apart from the restricted therapies listed above, there was no limit on the use of stable doses of biologic or non-biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Initiation of the restricted therapies was allowed after 6 months of trial treatment in subjects with deterioration of ILD or CTD. Use of nintedanib and pirfenidone was prohibited at randomization and during the trial.

Restricted or prohibited therapies were defined based on customized drug groupings (CDGs). We present data based on the CDGs “corticosteroids”, “nintedanib” and “pirfenidone”, and the preferred names azathioprine, cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, glucocorticoids, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab. Glucocorticoids were only counted as restricted therapies if a high dose (> 20 mg/day prednisone or equivalent) was used and the route of administration was oral, intravenous, intravenous bolus, intravenous drip, or intramuscular. DMARDs were defined based on WHO standardized drug groupings (SDGs).

Analyses

Analyses of the annual rate of decline in FVC were consistent with previous analyses [9, 10] and are summarized in Additional file 2: Appendix S2. We analyzed the rate of decline in FVC (mL/year) over 52 weeks in subgroups taking glucocorticoids: > 20 mg/day (referred to as “high-dose”) (in deviation from the protocol) or ≤ 20 mg/day prednisone or equivalent (referred to as “low-dose”) or not taking glucocorticoids at baseline. We analyzed potential heterogeneity in the relative effect of nintedanib in reducing the rate of decline in FVC between these subgroups (see Additional file 2). We also analyzed the rate of decline in FVC in subgroups by use of high-dose glucocorticoids, low-dose glucocorticoids, or no glucocorticoids at baseline.

To assess the potential impact of prohibited or restricted therapies, including high-dose glucocorticoids, on the treatment effect of nintedanib, we analyzed the rate of decline in FVC over 52 weeks (1) excluding subjects who took ≥ 1 prohibited or restricted therapy over 52 weeks and (2) excluding FVC measurements taken after initiation of prohibited or restricted therapy. Use of prohibited or restricted therapies over 52 weeks comprised use at baseline, during treatment with trial drug, or following discontinuation of trial drug (up to week 52) for any duration. We report adverse events in subgroups who did and did not use prohibited or restricted therapies at baseline or during treatment with trial drug. Finally, we analyzed the rate of decline in FVC over 52 weeks (1) excluding subjects who took ≥ 1 low-dose glucocorticoid or prohibited or restricted therapy over 52 weeks and (2) excluding FVC measurements after initiation of these therapies. Analyses were post-hoc and performed in all subjects, subjects with a UIP-like fibrotic pattern on HRCT, and subjects with other fibrotic patterns on HRCT with the exception of the last analyses and adverse events, which were only investigated in the overall population. Analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4.

Results

Subjects

A total of 663 subjects received ≥ 1 dose of trial drug. At baseline, mean (SD) age was 65.8 (9.8) years, FVC was 69.0 (15.6) % predicted; 53.7% of subjects were male and 62.1% had a UIP-like fibrotic pattern on HRCT. Subjects’ ILD diagnoses (grouped) were chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (26.1%), autoimmune disease-related ILDs (25.6%) (13.4% had RA-ILD), iNSIP (18.9%), unclassifiable IIP (17.2%) and other ILDs (12.2%).

At baseline, 353 subjects (53.2%) (174 nintedanib, 179 placebo) were taking low-dose glucocorticoids, while 8 subjects (3 nintedanib, 5 placebo) were taking high-dose glucocorticoids; 4.7% of subjects were taking biologic DMARDs and 11.6% of subjects were taking non-biologic DMARDs (Additional file 3: Table S1). Most subjects taking DMARDs had autoimmune disease-related ILDs (Additional file 4: Table S2).

Analyses based on glucocorticoid use at baseline

Baseline characteristics of subjects taking high-dose, low-dose, or no glucocorticoids are shown in Table 1 (overall population) and Additional file 5: Table S3 and Additional file 6: Table S4 (subpopulations by HRCT pattern).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of subgroups taking high-dose, low-dose, or no glucocorticoids at baseline
Full size table

In the overall population, the adjusted rate of decline in FVC (mL/year) over 52 weeks in the placebo group was numerically greater in subjects taking glucocorticoids (high-dose [n = 8] or low-dose [n = 353]) at baseline than in those not taking glucocorticoids (− 206.4 [SE 20.2] vs − 165.8 [21.9]) (Fig. 1a). Findings were similar in subjects with a UIP-like fibrotic pattern on HRCT (− 254.1 [28.4] vs − 164.6 [29.5] mL/year) (Additional file 7: Table S5). In subjects with other fibrotic patterns on HRCT, the adjusted rate of decline in FVC (mL/year) over 52 weeks was − 145.0 (27.9) in those taking glucocorticoids and − 167.0 (32.8) in those not taking glucocorticoids at baseline (Additional file 7: Table S5). The interaction P value did not indicate heterogeneity in the treatment effect of nintedanib on reducing the rate of decline in FVC between the subgroups by use versus non-use of glucocorticoids (high-dose or low-dose) at baseline in the overall population (P = 0.18), in subjects with a UIP-like fibrotic pattern on HRCT (P = 0.11) or in subjects with other fibrotic patterns on HRCT (P = 0.80) (Additional file 8: Figure S1). There was also no indication of heterogeneity in the relative treatment effect of nintedanib between subgroups by use of glucocorticoids (high-dose or low-dose) in the overall population or in the subpopulations by HRCT pattern (Fig. 1b).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Rate of decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) (mL/year) with nintedanib and placebo (a) and relative treatment effect of nintedanib (b) over 52 weeks in subgroups taking or not taking glucocorticoids at baseline. Glucocorticoids were taken at a dose of > 20 mg/day prednisone or equivalent by 8 subjects. HRCT high-resolution computed tomography, UIP usual interstitial pneumonia

Full size image

In analyses in subgroups by use of high-dose glucocorticoids, low-dose glucocorticoids, or no glucocorticoids at baseline, the interaction P values did not indicate heterogeneity in the treatment effect of nintedanib on reducing the rate of decline in FVC between the subgroups in the overall population or in the subpopulations by HRCT pattern (Additional file 9: Figure S2).

Use of prohibited or restricted therapies over 52 weeks

The proportions of subjects taking prohibited or restricted therapies over 52 weeks were smaller in the nintedanib group than the placebo group in the overall population (16.0% vs 27.5%), in subjects with a UIP-like fibrotic pattern on HRCT (17.0% vs 28.2%), in subjects with other fibrotic patterns on HRCT (14.3% vs 26.4%) and across subgroups by ILD diagnosis (Table 2; Additional file 10: Table S6, Additional file 11: Table S7, Additional file 12: Table S8). The most frequently used restricted therapies were high-dose glucocorticoids (13.3% nintedanib, 21.8% placebo) and mycophenolate mofetil (2.7% in both groups) (Table 2). Over 52 weeks, in the overall population, low-dose glucocorticoids were taken by a higher proportion of subjects in the nintedanib group than the placebo group (52.4% vs 45.9%). Findings were similar between the subpopulations by HRCT pattern (Additional file 13: Table S9).

Table 2 Restricted or prohibited immunomodulatory or antifibrotic therapies taken at baseline, during treatment with trial drug and/or following discontinuation of trial drug over 52 weeks by customized drug grouping or preferred name
Full size table

In the overall population, the effect of nintedanib versus placebo in reducing the rate of decline in FVC in analyses excluding subjects who took ≥ 1 prohibited or restricted therapy over 52 weeks, or excluding FVC measurements taken after initiation of prohibited or restricted therapy, were similar to the primary analysis (Fig. 2). These findings were also observed in the subpopulations by HRCT pattern (Additional file 14: Figure S3).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Rate of decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) (mL/year) over 52 weeks in the primary analysis, in an analysis excluding subjects who took ≥ 1 restricted or prohibited therapy, and in an analysis excluding FVC measurements taken after initiation of restricted or prohibited therapy (in the overall population)

Full size image

Similarly, in the overall population, the effect of nintedanib versus placebo in reducing the rate of decline in FVC was maintained in an analysis excluding subjects who took ≥ 1 low-dose glucocorticoid or prohibited or restricted therapy over 52 weeks, or excluding FVC measurements taken after initiation of these therapies (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Rate of decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) (mL/year) over 52 weeks in the primary analysis, in an analysis excluding subjects who took ≥ 1 low-dose glucocorticoid or restricted or prohibited therapy, and in an analysis excluding FVC measurements taken after initiation of low-dose glucocorticoids or restricted or prohibited therapy (in the overall population)

Full size image

Adverse events by use of prohibited or restricted therapies at baseline or during treatment with trial drug

The adverse event profile of nintedanib was similar between subjects who did and did not use prohibited or restricted therapies at baseline or during treatment with trial drug (Table 3). Lower respiratory tract infections (e.g. bronchitis), adverse events of ILD progression and dyspnea, and serious adverse events were more frequently reported in both treatment groups in subjects who used than did not use prohibited or restricted medications over 52 weeks (Table 3).

Table 3 Adverse events in subgroups by use of restricted or prohibited immunomodulatory or antifibrotic therapies
Full size table

Discussion

Subjects enrolled in the INBUILD trial had chronic fibrosing ILDs that had progressed within the previous 2 years despite management deemed appropriate in clinical practice. At the time the trial was conducted, there were no approved treatments for progressive fibrosing ILDs other than IPF, but glucocorticoids and immunomodulatory therapies were the mainstay of treatment for fibrosing ILDs [8] and at baseline, glucocorticoids were taken by over half the patients in the INBUILD trial. In the SENSCIS trial in patients with SSc-ILD, subjects were allowed to continue taking certain immunomodulatory medications. Data from this trial suggest that combination therapy with immunomodulatory therapy and nintedanib may provide the greatest benefit in reducing FVC decline in patients with SSc-ILD [11]. In the INBUILD trial, to minimize the potential impact of immunomodulatory therapies on the assessment of the efficacy and safety of nintedanib, the use of such therapies was restricted at randomization and over the first 6 months of the trial. The use of glucocorticoids at a dose of ≤ 20 mg/day prednisone or equivalent was permitted and over half the subjects were taking these at baseline. Nintedanib had a consistent effect on reducing the rate of decline in FVC in subjects who were and were not taking glucocorticoids at baseline, with a safety profile consistent with that observed in patients with IPF [12, 13].

In the placebo group, the rate of decline in FVC was numerically greater in subjects who were taking glucocorticoids at baseline than in those who were not. These data should be interpreted with caution given that there were differences between these subgroups at baseline; however, other studies have found no benefit of glucocorticoids in reducing the progression of fibrosing ILDs [6, 14,15,16,17]. The INBUILD trial was not designed to determine whether immunomodulatory therapies had adverse effects in patients with fibrosing ILDs, as observed in patients with IPF treated with prednisone and azathioprine in the PANTHER-IPF trial [15]. However, in both treatment groups, a higher proportion of subjects taking than not taking restricted therapies at baseline experienced lower respiratory infections such as bronchitis. This may have been due partly to an increased risk of infections in patients taking immunomodulatory medications, and partly to greater use of such medications in patients with more severe/progressive disease, as suggested by the lower FVC and DLco at baseline, greater rate of decline in FVC during the trial, and higher frequency of adverse events of dyspnea, ILD progression and serious adverse events in the subgroup taking glucocorticoids at baseline.

The proportion of subjects who took restricted immunomodulatory therapies during the INBUILD trial was higher in the placebo group than the nintedanib group, across subpopulations by HRCT pattern and subgroups by ILD diagnosis. As restricted medications were allowed as “rescue” therapy, i.e. in case of clinically significant deterioration, the increased use of such medications in the placebo group might be expected given the higher rate of FVC decline in this group. The potential impact of prohibited or restricted therapies on the treatment effect of nintedanib could not be determined by conducting a subgroup analysis as the use of such therapies is a post-baseline factor. Instead, we addressed this question firstly by excluding subjects who used these medications from the analysis, and secondly by excluding FVC measurements taken after these medications were initiated. Both of these methodologies were conservative, as they took into account use of any of these medications at any time, for any duration, and for any reason, and indicated that use of prohibited and restricted medications had no impact on the effect of nintedanib in reducing the rate of decline in FVC.

Conclusions

The patients enrolled in the INBUILD trial had chronic fibrosing ILDs that were progressing despite management deemed appropriate in clinical practice, including immunomodulatory therapies commonly used in the treatment of ILDs. While the INBUILD trial was not designed to evaluate the effects of concomitant medications on the rate of decline in FVC, our analyses suggest that the use of glucocorticoids at baseline, or the introduction of immunomodulatory therapies during the trial, did not affect the benefit of nintedanib in reducing the rate of FVC decline in patients with chronic fibrosing ILDs and a progressive phenotype.

Availability of data and materials

Researchers may request access to de-identified participant clinical study data with documentation describing the structure and content of the datasets. Upon approval, and governed by a Data Sharing Agreement, data would be shared in a secured data-access system for a period of 1 year, which may be extended upon request. Researchers should use the link https://trials.boehringer-ingelheim.com/ to request access to study data.

Abbreviations

CDG:

Customized drug grouping

DLco:

Diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide

DMARD:

Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug

FVC:

Forced vital capacity

HRCT:

High-resolution computed tomography

IIP:

Idiopathic interstitial pneumonia

ILD:

Interstitial lung disease

iNSIP:

Idiopathic non-specific interstitial pneumonia

IPF:

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

RA:

Rheumatoid arthritis

SDG:

Standardized drug grouping

SSc:

Systemic sclerosis

UIP:

Usual interstitial pneumonia

References

  1. Raghu G, Remy-Jardin M, Myers JL, et al. Diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. An official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT clinical practice guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;198(5):e44–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wells AU, Brown KK, Flaherty KR, Kolb M, Thannickal VJ, IPF Consensus Working Group. What’s in a name? That which we call IPF, by any other name would act the same. Eur Respir J. 2018;51(5):1800692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cottin V, Hirani NA, Hotchkin DL, et al. Presentation, diagnosis and clinical course of the spectrum of progressive-fibrosing interstitial lung diseases. Eur Respir Rev. 2018;27(150):180076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kolb M, Vašáková M. The natural history of progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases. Respir Res. 2019;20(1):57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown KK, Martinez FJ, Walsh SLF, et al. The natural history of progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases. Eur Respir J. 2020;55(6):2000085.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. De Sadeleer LJ, Hermans F, De Dycker E, et al. Effects of corticosteroid treatment and antigen avoidance in a large hypersensitivity pneumonitis cohort: a single-centre cohort study. J Clin Med. 2018;8(1):14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Salisbury ML, Myers JL, Belloli EA, Kazerooni EA, Martinez FJ, Flaherty KR. Diagnosis and treatment of fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonia. Where we stand and where we need to go. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017;196(6):690–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wijsenbeek M, Kreuter M, Olson A, et al. Progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases: current practice in diagnosis and management. Curr Med Res Opin. 2019;35(11):2015–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Flaherty KR, Wells AU, Cottin V, et al. Nintedanib in progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(18):1718–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wells AU, Flaherty KR, Brown KK, et al. Nintedanib in patients with progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases-subgroup analyses by interstitial lung disease diagnosis in the INBUILD trial: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8(5):453–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Distler O, Highland KB, Gahlemann M, et al. Nintedanib for systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(26):2518–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Richeldi L, du Bois RM, Raghu G, et al. Efficacy and safety of nintedanib in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(22):2071–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lancaster L, Crestani B, Hernandez P, et al. Safety and survival data in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis treated with nintedanib: pooled data from six clinical trials. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2019;6(1):e000397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Richeldi L, Davies HRHR, Spagnolo P, Luppi F. Corticosteroids for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003;(3):CD002880.

  15. Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Clinical Research Network, Raghu G, Anstrom KJ, King TE Jr, Lasky JA, Martinez FJ. Prednisone, azathioprine, and N-acetylcysteine for pulmonary fibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(21):1968–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Adler S, Huscher D, Siegert E, et al. Systemic sclerosis associated interstitial lung disease—individualized immunosuppressive therapy and course of lung function: results of the EUSTAR group. Arthritis Res Ther. 2018;20(1):17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. De Sadeleer LJ, Hermans F, De Dycker E, et al. Impact of BAL lymphocytosis and presence of honeycombing on corticosteroid treatment effect in fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis: a retrospective cohort study. Eur Respir J. 2020;55(4):1901983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the patients who participated in the INBUILD trial. The authors meet criteria for authorship as recommended by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). The authors did not receive payment for development of this manuscript. Writing assistance was provided by Elizabeth Ng, B.Sc and Wendy Morris, M.Sc of FleishmanHillard, London, UK, which was contracted and funded by Boehringer Ingelheim. Boehringer Ingelheim was given the opportunity to review the manuscript for medical and scientific accuracy as well as intellectual property considerations.

Funding

The INBUILD trial was funded by Boehringer Ingelheim.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Reference Center for Rare Pulmonary Diseases, Louis Pradel Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Claude Bernard University Lyon 1, University of Lyon, INRA, UMR754, Lyon, France

    Vincent Cottin

  2. Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy

    Luca Richeldi

  3. Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA

    Ivan Rosas

  4. Fundación Para El Estudio de Enfermedades Fibrosantes del Pulmón, Buenos Aires, Argentina

    Maria Otaola

  5. Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

    Jin Woo Song

  6. Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy

    Sara Tomassetti

  7. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    Marlies Wijsenbeek

  8. Mainanalytics GmbH, Sulzbach, Germany

    Manuela Schmitz

  9. SCS Boehringer Ingelheim Comm.V., Brussels, Belgium

    Carl Coeck

  10. Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany

    Susanne Stowasser

  11. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ridgefield, CT, USA

    Rozsa Schlenker-Herceg

  12. McMaster University and St. Joseph’s Healthcare, Hamilton, ON, Canada

    Martin Kolb

Authors
  1. Vincent Cottin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Luca Richeldi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ivan Rosas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Maria Otaola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jin Woo Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sara Tomassetti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Marlies Wijsenbeek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Manuela Schmitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Carl Coeck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Susanne Stowasser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Rozsa Schlenker-Herceg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Martin Kolb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

the INBUILD Trial Investigators

Contributions

VC, LR, CC, SSt, RSH, and MK were involved in the design of the study. MS was involved in data analysis. All authors were involved in the interpretation of the data and in the writing and critical review of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincent Cottin.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The clinical protocol was approved by an independent ethics committee or institutional review board at each participating center (listed in Additional file 1: Appendix S1). All patients provided written informed consent before study entry.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

VC reports research grants, personal fees, and non-financial support from Boehringer Ingelheim; personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Celgene, FibroGen, Galapagos, Galecto, Novartis, Sanofi, and Shionogi; and personal fees and non-financial support from Actelion, and Roche/Promedior. LR reports personal fees from Asahi Kasei, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, CSL Behring, FibroGen, ImmuneWorks, Nitto, Pliant Therapeutics, Promedior, Respivant, Roche, and Toray. IR reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Genentech/Roche and grants from Genentech/Roche. MO reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Bristol-Myers Squibb. JWS has nothing to disclose. ST reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche and grants from Roche. MW reports grants paid to her institution from Boehringer Ingelheim and Hoffman-La Roche and fees paid to her institution from Boehringer Ingelheim, Hoffman-La Roche, Galapagos, Respivant, Novartis, and Savara. MS is an employee of mainanalytics GmbH, which was contracted by Boehringer Ingelheim to conduct analyses presented in this manuscript. CC, SSt, and RSH are employees of Boehringer Ingelheim. MK reports personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Covance, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Indalo, Prometic, Roche, and Third Pole, Inc and grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Prometic, and Roche.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Appendix S1.

List of independent ethics committees and institutional review boards.

Additional file 2: Appendix S2.

Analysis of the annual rate of decline in FVC (mL/year).

Additional file 3: Table S1.

Proportions of subjects taking disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) at baseline by WHO standardized drug grouping and preferred name.

Additional file 4: Table S2.

Proportions of subjects taking disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) at baseline by WHO standardized drug grouping and preferred name in subgroups by ILD diagnosis.

Additional file 5: Table S3.

Baseline characteristics of subjects with a UIP-like fibrotic pattern on HRCT taking high-dose, low-dose, or no glucocorticoids at baseline.

Additional file 6: Table S4.

Baseline characteristics of subjects with other fibrotic patterns on HRCT taking high-dose, low-dose, or no glucocorticoids at baseline.

Additional file 7: Table S5.

Rate of decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) (mL/year) over 52 weeks in subgroups taking or not taking glucocorticoids (high-dose or low-dose) at baseline in subjects with a UIP-like fibrotic pattern on HRCT and subjects with other fibrotic patterns on HRCT.

Additional file 8: Figure S1.

Rate of decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) (mL/year) over 52 weeks in subgroups taking or not taking glucocorticoids (high-dose or low-dose) at baseline in the overall population (A), in subjects with a UIP-like fibrotic pattern on HRCT (B) and in subjects with other fibrotic patterns on HRCT (C).

Additional file 9: Figure S2.

Rate of decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) (mL/year) over 52 weeks in subgroups taking high-dose, low-dose, or no glucocorticoids at baseline in the overall population (A), in subjects with a UIP-like fibrotic pattern on HRCT (B) and in subjects with other fibrotic patterns on HRCT (C).

Additional file 10: Table S6.

Restricted or prohibited immunomodulatory or antifibrotic therapies taken at baseline, during treatment with trial drug and/or following discontinuation of trial drug over 52 weeks by customized drug grouping or preferred name in subjects with a UIP-like fibrotic pattern on HRCT.

Additional file 11: Table S7.

Restricted or prohibited immunomodulatory or antifibrotic therapies taken at baseline, during treatment with trial drug and/or following discontinuation of trial drug over 52 weeks by customized drug grouping (CDG) category or preferred name in subjects with other fibrotic patterns on HRCT.

Additional file 12: Table S8.

Restricted or prohibited immunomodulatory or antifibrotic therapies taken at baseline, during treatment with trial drug and/or following discontinuation of trial drug over 52 weeks by customized drug grouping or preferred name in subgroups by ILD diagnosis.

Additional file 13: Table S9.

Proportions of subjects taking high-dose or low-dose glucocorticoids at baseline, during treatment and/or following discontinuation of trial drug over 52 weeks.

Additional file 14: Figure S3.

Rate of decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) (mL/year) over 52 weeks in subjects with a UIP-like fibrotic pattern on HRCT (A) or other fibrotic patterns on HRCT (B) in the primary analysis, in an analysis excluding subjects who took ≥ 1 restricted or prohibited therapy, and in an analysis excluding FVC measurements taken after initiation of restricted or prohibited therapy.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cottin, V., Richeldi, L., Rosas, I. et al. Nintedanib and immunomodulatory therapies in progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases. Respir Res 22, 84 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-021-01668-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-021-01668-1

Keywords

Respiratory Research

ISSN: 1465-993X

Contact us