- Letter to the Editor
- Open Access
Happy hypoxemia, or blunted ventilation?
Respiratory Research volume 22, Article number: 4 (2021)
Happy hypoxemia is an unspecified definition that is used in COVID-19 patients to define hypoxemia without dyspnoea. Dyspnoea is a very complex symptom, and although hypoxemia can cause breathlessness, dyspnoea is not related to hypoxemia, but is more closely related to inspiratory drive and mechanical alterations. The lack of dyspnoea in the early stages of the disease is likely related to the absence of increased inspiratory drive due to compensatory mechanisms of hypoxemia, while in the advanced stages there is no evidence of a lack of dyspnoea in COVID-19 patients.
Letter to the editor
We read “The pathophysiology of ‘happy’ hypoxemia in COVID-19” by Dhont et al.  and the related comment by Tobin et al.  with interest and although we agree with many concepts, there are some points that need clarification.
The authors started from the assumption that "happy hypoxemia" was clearly related to COVID-19 and then proceeded with the explanation of its mechanisms, but we think that this assumption needs stronger evidence. We too were attracted by the hypothesis that the lack of dyspnea perception was due to a neurological involvement of the nervous system in COVID-19 patients, but we could not demonstrated any relationship between lower dyspnea perception and neurological involvement of the nervous system . Moreover, our data and available data on COVID-19 patients seem to confirm that dyspnea is more frequent in more severe patients, confirming a relationship between hypoxemia and dyspnea, rather than the other way around [4, 5]. Dhont et al. asserted that many COVID-19 patients have lack of dyspnea, and they quoted Tobin et al., who published a case report of 3 subjects with hypoxemia and lack of dyspnea , Wilkerson et al, who published another case report , and then two papers that only reported some anecdotal stories without any data [8, 9]. Even if there are some cases of COVID-19 patients who do not perceive dyspnea despite severe hypoxemia, as the authors affirm, this it is not exclusively seen in COVID-19, but may also occur in patients with atelectasis, intrapulmonary shunt or right-to-left intracardiac shunt, and there is no evidence that the prevalence of the lack of dyspnea perception is more frequent in COVID-19 pneumonia compared to other pneumonias, or that it is a typical feature of this condition due to the involvement of some neurological pathway .
Dyspnea is a complex symptom defined as “a subjective experience of breathing discomfort that consists of qualitatively distinct sensations that vary in intensity” . Work/effort to breathe, difficult inspiration/air hunger and tight chest are three different well studied qualities of dyspnea and underpin distinct neurological pathways . Surely, the first step for studying dyspnea is to anchor it to physiological parameters (mostly the central respiratory neural drive) or to mechanical loads such as ventilation or respiratory rate (RR) . Linking dyspnea to oxygen rather than to ventilation, as in the title itself “happy hypoxemia”, can be misleading, because dyspnea is not the perception of hypoxemia, but “surprise would arise only if sensory afferents or hypoxemia elicited significant stimulation of the respiratory centers and the patient did not develop dyspnea” . For example, the Wilkerons et al. patient without dyspnea had 85% of saturation, but normal RR and maybe that is the reason for the absence of dyspnea. Surprisingly, Tobin et al. do not provide data on their three patients’ respiratory parameters . Although the authors are right when they say that in the Guan study the prevalence of dyspnea was 18.7% overall, they omitted that it was higher in more severe patients (37.6%) than in non-severe patients (15.1%) and also higher (53.7%) in patients admitted to the ICU . Similarly, in the Huang study  the prevalence of dyspnea was 55% (92% in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients vs 37% of non-ICU patients), and it was related to a higher RR in more severe patients.
As has been widely demonstrated [1, 6, 12], hypoxemia is only a weak stimulus for respiratory drive and consequently for dyspnea if it is not accompanied by an increase in CO2 or a reduction in pH, therefore more than “happy hypoxemia”, it is only a physiological blunted ventilation to the hypoxic stimulus. On the other hand, if an increased respiratory drive due to hypoxemic stimulus without any dyspnea perception had been demonstrated, then the mechanisms involved could be caused by the damage of afferent fibers due the cytokine storm syndrome of SARS-CoV2, similar to the mechanisms of ageusia and anosmia, as hypothesized by other authors . Figure 1 summarizes a possible pattern of dyspnea in COVID-19 patients.
It is easier to say what we do not know about COVID-19 and dyspnea, instead of what we know. We do not know if the lack of dyspnea is a typical feature of COVID-19 or if it is similar to other pathologies, we do not know its prevalence nor its incidence, we do not have physiology studies to describe the relationship among dyspnea and respiratory drive, we do not know the quality of dyspnea described by patients and only further research can answer these questions.
Availability of data and materials
Intensive care unit
Dhont S, Derom E, Van Braeckel E, et al. The pathophysiology of ‘happy’ hypoxemia in COVID-19. Respir Res. 2020;21:198. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-020-01462-5.
Tobin MJ, Jubran A, Laghi F. Misconceptions of pathophysiology of happy hypoxemia and implications for management of COVID-19. Respir Res. 2020;21:249. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-020-01520-y.
Ora J, Liguori C, Puxeddu E, et al. Dyspnea perception and neurological symptoms in non-severe COVID-19 patients. Neurol Sci. 2020;41:2671–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-020-04632-x.
Guan W-J, Ni Z-Y, Hu Y, et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1708–20. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2002032.
Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395:497–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5.
Tobin MJ, Laghi F, Jubran A. Why COVID-19 silent hypoxemia is baffling to physicians. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;202:356–60. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202006-2157CP.
Wilkerson RG, Adler JD, Shah NG, Brown R. Silent hypoxia: a harbinger of clinical deterioration in patients with COVID-19. Am J Emergency Med. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2020.05.044.
Couzin-Frankel J. The mystery of the pandemic’s ‘happy hypoxia.’ Science. 2020;368:455–6. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.368.6490.455.
Allali G, Marti C, Grosgurin O, et al. Dyspnea: the vanished warning symptom of COVID-19 pneumonia. J Med Virol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.26172.
Parshall MB, Schwartzstein RM, Adams L, et al. An official American Thoracic Society statement: update on the mechanisms, assessment, and management of dyspnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;185:435–52. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201111-2042ST.
Faisal A, Alghamdi BJ, Ciavaglia CE, et al. Common mechanisms of dyspnea in chronic interstitial and obstructive lung disorders. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;193:299–309. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201504-0841OC.
Easton PA, Slykerman LJ, Anthonisen NR. Ventilatory response to sustained hypoxia in normal adults. J Appl Physiol. 1986;61:906–11. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.19220.127.116.116.
Bertran Recasens B, Martinez-Llorens JM, Rodriguez-Sevilla JJ, Rubio MA. Lack of dyspnea in Covid-19 patients; another neurological conundrum? Eur J Neurol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.14265.
Not applicable. No funds were used for this manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
Not applicable (no personal data is presented).
JO, MD, PR, DO have no conflicts of interest concerning this topic.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Ora, J., Rogliani, P., Dauri, M. et al. Happy hypoxemia, or blunted ventilation?. Respir Res 22, 4 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-020-01604-9
- Dyspnea descriptors
- Respiratory drive