- Correction
- Open access
- Published:
Correction to: Cost-effectiveness analysis of umeclidinium bromide/vilanterol 62.5/25 mcg versus tiotropium/olodaterol 5/5 mcg in symptomatic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a Spanish National Healthcare System perspective
Respiratory Research volume 20, Article number: 18 (2019)
Correction to: Respir Res
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-018-0916-7
Following publication of the original article [1], we have been notified of the below corrections to the 5th paragraph in the Discussion section.
-
Reference 24 needs to be amended to 25
-
The 12-week study needs to be corrected to 8-week study
Corrected text:
This study is the first to compare two LAMA/LABA dual therapies using direct head-to-head data from a randomized, 8-week study [25], which is the most reliable set of data to include within a cost-effectiveness model [25].
Reference
Driessen, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of umeclidinium bromide/vilanterol 62.5/25 mcg versus tiotropium/olodaterol 5/5 mcg in symptomatic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a Spanish National Healthcare System perspective. Respir Res. 2018;19:224. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-018-0916-7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
About this article
Cite this article
Driessen, M.T., Whalen, J., Buguth, B.S. et al. Correction to: Cost-effectiveness analysis of umeclidinium bromide/vilanterol 62.5/25 mcg versus tiotropium/olodaterol 5/5 mcg in symptomatic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a Spanish National Healthcare System perspective. Respir Res 20, 18 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-019-0985-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-019-0985-2