Skip to main content

Correction to: Cost-effectiveness analysis of umeclidinium bromide/vilanterol 62.5/25 mcg versus tiotropium/olodaterol 5/5 mcg in symptomatic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a Spanish National Healthcare System perspective

The Original Article was published on 20 November 2018

Correction to: Respir Res

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-018-0916-7

Following publication of the original article [1], we have been notified of the below corrections to the 5th paragraph in the Discussion section.

  • Reference 24 needs to be amended to 25

  • The 12-week study needs to be corrected to 8-week study

Corrected text:

This study is the first to compare two LAMA/LABA dual therapies using direct head-to-head data from a randomized, 8-week study [25], which is the most reliable set of data to include within a cost-effectiveness model [25].

Reference

  1. Driessen, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of umeclidinium bromide/vilanterol 62.5/25 mcg versus tiotropium/olodaterol 5/5 mcg in symptomatic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a Spanish National Healthcare System perspective. Respir Res. 2018;19:224. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-018-0916-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. Asukai.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Driessen, M.T., Whalen, J., Buguth, B.S. et al. Correction to: Cost-effectiveness analysis of umeclidinium bromide/vilanterol 62.5/25 mcg versus tiotropium/olodaterol 5/5 mcg in symptomatic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a Spanish National Healthcare System perspective. Respir Res 20, 18 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-019-0985-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-019-0985-2