Skip to main content
Help us understand how you use our websites. Take part in our 30 minute study now.

Acute effects of nicotine-free and flavour-free electronic cigarette use on lung functions in healthy and asthmatic individuals


We designed a crossover and placebo-controlled trial to investigate the impact of a 1-h acute vaping session of nicotine-free and flavour-free e-liquid on the pulmonary functions and respiratory mechanics of healthy and asthmatic individuals. This study shows that a 1-h vaping session of a high-grade and contaminant-free mixture of propylene glycol and glycerol using a commercially available electronic cigarette performed in a controlled environment does not significantly impact pulmonary functions, respiratory mechanics or symptoms in healthy or asthmatic subjects.

To the Editor,

Electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use or ‘vaping’ has stormed the world over the past years. It is available everywhere and regardless of age, and is aggressively marketed as a safe way to stop smoking despite a lack of solid evidence. Reality is that we do not know the consequences of vaping on pulmonary health and research is urgently needed to identify potential health hazards.

While most emphasis is placed on nicotine and flavouring agents found in e-liquid, very little scientific knowledge is available on the acute effects of propylene glycol and glycerol inhalation, the two compounds representing the great majority of e-liquid total volume. We therefore aimed at characterizing the acute effects of inhaling propylene glycol and glycerol on lung functions. We were also interested to compare potential differences between volunteers with no documented lung disease and volunteers with diagnosed asthma, as the latter are generally more sensitive to pulmonary irritants and bronchoconstrictive stimuli.

We conducted a randomized cross-over, placebo-controlled study on the acute effect of nicotine-free and flavour-free e-cigarette vapor inhalation. Volunteers were aware of using full (experimental) or empty (placebo) e-cigarettes as no vapors were coming out of the empty placebo device. The e-liquid consisted of a mixture of 70% USP-grade propylene glycol (PG) and 30% USP-grade glycerol (Gly), mixed in our laboratory under a biosafety cabinet. This 70%PG/30%Gly mixture is largely representative of what is used on the market to dissolve nicotine and/or flavours. Our approach was to create the best-case scenario, where unwanted and possibly harmful contaminants are absent, to specifically investigate the pulmonary effects of PG and Gly. Twenty healthy volunteers and ten asthmatic volunteers were recruited for the trial. Healthy volunteers were aged between 20 and 37 years, had no documented lung disease and had normal response to methacholine. Asthmatic volunteers were aged between 21 and 40 years and all had received a diagnosis of asthma and had airway hyperresponsiveness as shown by a positive methacholine challenge. All volunteers were non-smokers and none were active e-cigarette users. Moreover, none of the volunteers were exposed to secondary tobacco or e-cigarette vapors at home. All volunteers gave their written informed consent and the IUCPQ-UL Ethics Board approved the trial (reference number 2015–2459 21256).

The experimental and placebo sessions took place 1 week apart. A preceding visit was also planned, where baseline measurements were taken (i.e. vital signs, lung functions, airway resistance measurements), a methacholine challenge was performed according to Juniper et al. [1], and volunteers were familiarized with the e-cigarette. On the following two sessions (experimental and placebo), volunteers were asked to inhale three times per minute, in sitting position, for a total duration of 1 hour. Respiratory mechanics and lung functions were measured by the forced oscillation technique (TremoFlow) and spirometry, respectively and in that order, immediately before (T0), immediately after (T60), and 30 min after (T90) the inhalation sessions. Respiratory symptoms were collected according to the Borg perception scale at the same time points as well as every 20 min during the inhalation session. The fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) were also measured in asthmatic volunteers. FeNO and serum samples were not collected in non-asthmatic volunteers.

All volunteers were able to complete the sessions. Data collected are presented in Table 1. A few subjects noticed symptoms when using the loaded e-cigarette including cough, chest tightness, and secretions, but no consensual differences in symptoms were noticed in healthy or asthmatic volunteers. Changes in vital signs such as oxygen saturation, heart rate, and breathing frequency were not different between placebo or experimental sessions. No changes in lung functions were observed using either spirometry or forced oscillation technique. Finally, signs of flaring inflammation, such as increased FeNO and serum CRP levels, were not observed in response to e-cigarette in the asthmatic group.

Table 1 Symptoms, vital signs, lung function and inflammation parameters at baseline and following a 60-min period of air or e-liquid vaping in non-asthmatic and asthmatic subjects

This study shows that a 1-h inhalation session of a high-grade and contaminant-free mixture of propylene glycol and glycerol using a commercially available e-cigarette performed in a controlled environment does not significantly impact pulmonary function or symptoms in both healthy and asthmatic subjects. This is consistent with Ferrari et al. [2] and Flouris et al. [3]. The latter showed in healthy individuals that inhalation sessions of 5 or 30 min, respectively, had no significant effects on lung functions measured by spirometry.

An unavoidable limitation of this study and similar studies is that individuals are aware of using the full or empty e-cigarette. It is simply impossible to blind the individuals since the e-liquid has an off-taste and produces a significant amount of visible vapors. Subjective measures such as symptoms could have been affected by this limitation, but we believe that the objective physiological measures (i.e. spirometry, forced oscillation technique) were not affected.

Therefore, while acute exposure to e-cigarette vapors does not seem to cause significant functional pulmonary alterations in healthy and asthmatic individuals, there is an urgent need to study the effects of chronic use, especially in more susceptible populations such as teenagers, smokers, and individuals with chronic lung diseases such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.



Reactance area


Body mass index


C-reactive protein


Electronic cigarette


Fraction of exhaled nitric oxide

FEV1 :

Forced expiratory volume in 1 second


Forced oscillation technique


Resonant frequency


Forced vital capacity


Inspiratory capacity

R19 :

Airway resistance at 19 Hz

R5 :

Airway resistance at 5Hz


Standard deviation


Tidal volume

X5 :

Airway reactance at 5 Hz


  1. 1.

    Juniper EF, Frith PA, Dunnett C, Cockcroft DW, Hargreave FE. Reproducibility and comparison of responses to inhaled histamine and methacholine. Thorax. 1978;33:705–10.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Ferrari M, Zanasi A, Nardi E, Morselli Labate AM, Ceriana P, Balestrino A, Pisani L, Corcione N, Nava S. Short-term effects of a nicotine-free e-cigarette compared to a traditional cigarette in smokers and non-smokers. BMC Pulm Med. 2015;15:120.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Flouris AD, Chorti MS, Poulianiti KP, Jamurtas AZ, Kostikas K, Tzatzarakis MN, Wallace Hayes A, Tsatsakis AM, Koutedakis Y. Acute impact of active and passive electronic cigarette smoking on serum cotinine and lung function. Inhal Toxicol. 2013;25:91–101.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.


This study was funded by institutional funds. Funding body was not involved in study design, data collection, analysis or interpretation, or manuscript writing. No tobacco or electronic cigarette-related company or subsidiaries participated in this study in any way.

Authors’ contributions

MEB and CH performed the recruitment, data acquisition and analysis, and helped writing the manuscript. YB was involved in data analysis and helped writing the manuscript. LPB and MCM conceptualized the study, assisted with data analysis and helped writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

Source data presented in this manuscript will be made available upon request.

Competing interests

MEB, CH, YB, and MCM declare that they have no competing interests.

LPB declares the following potential competing interests:

Nonprofit Grants: Research funding provided to my center for participating in multicenter studies: These have mostly been performed in the context of the Canadian Network of Centers of Excellence “AllerGen” Projects: Altair, Amgen, Asmacure, AstraZeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Ono Pharma, Schering, Wyeth.

Support for Investigator Generated studies: Takeda, Merck, Boehringer-Ingelheim.

Consulting/advisory boards: Astra Zeneca, Novartis, Methapharm.

Royalties: Co- author for “Up-To-Date” card on occupational asthma.

Nonprofit Grants for production of educational materials: AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck Frosst, Boehringer-Ingelheim


Speaking Activities: Lecture fees from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Novartis.

Travel sponsorship to meetings for presentation of studies & Committees: Novartis, Takeda.

Others: Member of the Canadian Thoracic Society Respiratory Guidelines Committee;

Chair of GINA Guidelines Dissemination and Implementation Committee;

Laval University Chair on Knowledge Transfer, Prevention and Education in Respiratory and Cardiovascular Health.

Consent for publication

Not applicable. No individual person’s data is presented in this manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All volunteers gave their written informed consent and the IUCPQ-UL Ethics Board approved the trial (reference number 2015–2459 21256).

Take home message

An acute 1-h use of nicotine-free and flavour-free e-cigarette does not significantly affect lung functions of healthy and asthmatic individuals.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mathieu C. Morissette.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boulay, M., Henry, C., Bossé, Y. et al. Acute effects of nicotine-free and flavour-free electronic cigarette use on lung functions in healthy and asthmatic individuals. Respir Res 18, 33 (2017).

Download citation


  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
  • Lung Function
  • Propylene Glycol
  • Respiratory Mechanic
  • Electronic Cigarette