Open Access

The vectorial transport of salts and water is crucial for respiratory epithelial cell lines

Respiratory Research201516:70

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-015-0235-1

Received: 18 December 2014

Accepted: 10 June 2015

Published: 12 June 2015

Abstract

Primary culture of respiratory epithelial cells is useful to study the pathophysiology of respiratory diseases. However, such primary culture has been very limited because of its high dependence on the availability of biopsies and the long time required to reach confluence. Therefore, cell lines are an alternative to primary cultures because they reach confluence faster and some can maintain their differentiation abilities. However, unlike primary cultures and native tissues just some cell lines are able to polarize, with normal channel functionality and transepithelial ionic flux.

Keywords

Airway epithelial model Mucociliary differentiation Polarization Trans epithelial resistance Trans epithelial ionic flux

Dear Editor

I read with great enthusiasm the recent article written by Matthew Walters and colleagues in BMC Respiratory Research [1]. The authors reported the establishment of a basal cell line, BCi NS1.1, from respiratory epithelial basal cells of healthy non-smokers. The original cells were immortalized using a recombinant virus carrying the human telomerase gene. The established cell line maintained the properties of the original cells 30 even after 40 passages. Moreover, a mucociliary phenotype (positivity for MUC5AC, MUC5B, TFF3, CC10, DNAI1, and FoxJ1) was obtained by culture at the liquid air-interface. In addition, confluence of the cultures was confirmed by trans epithelial resistance (Rte) (57 ± 4 Ω × cm2 at day 10, 165 ± 67 Ω × cm2 at day 14, 1312 ± 281 Ω × cm2 at day 28, and 1563 ± 86 Ω × cm2 at day 40). Therefore, the authors concluded that the BCi NS1.1 cell line accurately mimics the airway epithelium, and can be considered as a model to study the interactions with environmental stimuli, cytokines, cigarette smoke or as a target for assessing of pharmacologic agents. However, studies of such interactions with the environment or drugs require not only a 100 % confluent culture but also polarization. The authors examined the Rte but this parameter is not sufficient to make conclusions about the polarization status of the cell line. Additionally, the Rte was 57 ± 4 Ω × cm2 (day 10) and 165 ± 67 Ω × cm2 (day 14) [25]. Moreover, this cell line requires more than 20 days to obtain Rte, which is comparable to the native epithelium [5]. Furthermore, confluence and the differentiation capacity of the monolayer do not necessarily indicate functionality, because a biological process called trans epithelial vectorial transport of salts and water must be present. In fact, normal flux transport indicates normal expression and functions of membrane-bound ion channels such as NaCl-, K+, and Na + and the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) [4, 69]. Each of these channels is crucial because dysfunction of one can cause severe pathologies [10]. A mutation in CFTR causes cystic fibrosis, suggesting the importance of this channel protein [11]. However, it has been documented that CFTR is not expressed in human airway basal cells [12]. Moreover, a previous study has shown that primary cystic fibrosis cell culture and some cystic fibrosis cell lines, secretes Cl in response to agonists [13]. That why it is important to analyze the transepithelial ionic flux. For this purpose, two parameters can be measured: (i) the potential difference (mV) and (ii) the short circuit current (Isc) (μA/cm2). Similar to native epithelium, passage 2 and 3 tracheobronchial epithelial cell cultures show Rte (500–800 Ω × cm2), but the equivalent Isc is much lower than that in native tissue (3 μA/cm2) [5, 14]. Furthermore, the Rte and Isc decrease to 100 Ω × cm2 and 2 μA/cm, respectively, at passage 4. In another study, human airway epithelial cells were successfully passaged up to six times with an Rte of 1000–4000 Ω × cm2 and Isc of 5 μA/cm [15]. Moreover, the results indicated few ciliated cells (only 10 %), whereas ciliated cells comprise 60–90 % of the surface of normal respiratory epithelium. In addition to maintaining barrier integrity, ciliated cells are important for absorption and secretion of electrolytes, which generate potential difference [16, 17]. Therefore, I believe that differentiation and cell polarization are inseparable parameters. Consequently, checking the new cell line for its vectorial transport of salts and water would be a useful addition.

Abbreviations

BCi NS1.1: 

Clone basal cell immortalized-nonsmoker 1

KRT5: 

Keratin 5

TP63: 

Tumor protein p63

TFF3: 

Trefoil factor 3

MUC5AC: 

Mucin 5, subtypes A and C

MUC5B: 

Mucin 5, subtype B

CC10: 

Clara cell protein 10

DNAI1: 

Dynein, axonemal, intermediate chain 1

FoxJ1: 

Forkhead box J1

Declarations

Acknowledgements

I would like to give my sincere gratitude to Prof. Stéphane Bretagne (Groupe Hospitalier Saint-Louis-Lariboisière-Fernand-Widal, Paris, France and Université Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne Cité, Paris, France) and Dr. Nadège Michaud (Research Center, Saint-François d’Assise Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec (CHUQ), Québec City, Québec, Canada) for reading the manuscript and providing their comments.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Research Center, Saint-François d’Assise Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec (CHUQ)

References

  1. Walters MS, Gomi K, Ashbridge B, Moore MA, Arbelaez V, Heldrich J, et al. Generation of a human airway epithelium derived basal cell line with multipotent differentiation capacity. Respir Res. 2013;14:135.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Khoufache K, Cabaret O, Farrugia C, Rivollet D, Alliot A, Allaire E, et al. Primary in vitro culture of porcine tracheal epithelial cells in an air-liquid interface as a model to study airway epithelium and Aspergillus fumigatus interactions. Med Mycol. 2010;48(8):1049–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Saha P, Kim KJ, Lee VH. A primary culture model of rabbit conjunctival epithelial cells exhibiting tight barrier properties. Curr Eye Res. 1996;15(12):1163–69.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Liu X, Luo M, Zhang L, Ding W, Yan Z, Engelhardt JF. Bioelectric properties of chloride channels in human, pig, ferret, and mouse airway epithelia. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2007;36(3):313–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Widdicombe JH, Sachs LA, Morrow JL, Finkbeiner WE. Expansion of cultures of human tracheal epithelium with maintenance of differentiated structure and function. Biotechniques. 2005;39(2):249–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Botterel F, Cordonnier C, Barbier V, Wingerstmann L, Liance M, Coste A, et al. Aspergillus fumigatus causes in vitro electrophysiological and morphological modifications in human nasal epithelial cells. Histol Histopathol. 2002;17(4):1095–101.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kunzelmann K, Kathofer S, Hipper A, Gruenert DC, Gregner R. Culture-dependent expression of Na + conductances in airway epithelial cells. Pflugers Arch. 1996;431:578–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Linsdell P. Functional architecture of the CFTR chloride channel. Mol Membr Biol. 2014;31(1):1–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kunzelmann K, Kathofer S, Greger R. Na + and Cl- conductances in airway epithelial cells: increased Na + conductance in cystic fibrosis. Pflugers Arch. 1995;431(1):1–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ferec C, Cutting GR. Assessing the Disease-Liability of Mutations in CFTR. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2012;2(12):a009480.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Song Y, Lou HH, Boyer JL, Limberis MP, Vandenberghe LH, Hackett NR, et al. Functional cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator expression in cystic fibrosis airway epithelial cells by AAV6.2-mediated segmental trans-splicing. Hum Gene Ther. 2009;20(3):267–81.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Hackett NR, Shaykhiev R, Walters MS, Wang R, Zwick RK, Ferris B, et al. The human airway epithelial basal cell transcriptome. PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e18378.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Jefferson DM, Valentich JD, Marini FC, Grubman SA, Iannuzzi MC, Dorkin HL, et al. Expression of normal and cystic fibrosis phenotypes by continuous airway epithelial cell lines. Am J Physiol. 1990;259(6 Pt 1):L496–505.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gray TE, Guzman K, Davis CW, Abdullah LH, Nettesheim P. Mucociliary differentiation of serially passaged normal human tracheobronchial epithelial cells. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1996;14(1):104–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Galietta LJ, Lantero S, Gazzolo A, Sacco O, Romano L, Rossi GA, et al. An improved method to obtain highly differentiated monolayers of human bronchial epithelial cells. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 1998;34(6):478–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Chapelin C, Coste A, Gilain L, Poron F, Verra F, Escudier E. Modified epithelial cell 132 distribution in chronic airways inflammation. Eur Respir J. 1996;9:2474–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Jeffery PK, Brain AP. Surface morphology of human airway mucosa: normal, carcinoma or cystic fibrosis. Scanning Microsc. 1988;2:553–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Khoufache. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement