Open Access

Endotoxin receptor CD14 in PiZ α-1-antitrypsin deficiency individuals

Respiratory Research20089:34

https://doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-9-34

Received: 13 February 2008

Accepted: 21 April 2008

Published: 21 April 2008

Abstract

Background

CD14, a receptor for lipopolysaccharides (LPS), is found in both a membrane-bound form (mCD14) and a soluble form (sCD14). It is suggested that sCD14 is mainly released from blood monocytes by serine protease-mediated shedding. Because α1-antitrypsin (AAT), an inhibitor of serine proteases, has been shown to regulate CD14 expression in human monocytes in vitro, we sought to investigate plasma levels of sCD14 and monocyte expression of mCD14 in subjects at age 30 years with normal MM and deficient PiZZ and PiSZ genotypes of AAT.

Methods

Plasma levels of AAT and sCD14 were measured in 75 PiZZ and 34 PiSZ individuals with normal lung function identified from the Swedish neonatal AAT deficiency screening, and in 95 age matched PiMM controls. The mCD14 expression in monocytes from 9 PiZZ, 6 PiSZ and 11 PiMM subjects was analysed by FACS and Quantitative Real Time Reverse Transcription PCA.

Results

As expected, plasma AAT concentrations were PiMM>PiSZ>PiZZ (p < 0.001). Plasma sCD14 levels were higher in PiZZ than in PiMM subjects (p < 0.01). The expression level of mCD14 was higher (1.89-fold) in monocytes isolated from PiZZ subjects compared to PiMM controls (p = 0.00189).

Conclusion

This study is the first to show higher levels of plasma sCD14 and monocyte mCD14 expression in young, clinically healthy PiZZ AAT subjects.

Background

CD14 is a multifunctional receptor constitutively expressed on the surface of various cells, including monocytes and macrophages, but it also occurs as a soluble form (sCD14) [1, 2]. In normal serum, sCD14 is present in relatively high concentrations (>1 μg/ml). However, in different inflammatory and infectious diseases like sepsis and autoimmune diseases, characterised by the activation of monocytes and macrophages, highly elevated levels of sCD14 can be found [3, 4]. In vitro and in vivo studies show that endotoxin (LPS) can induce sCD14 secretion and expression in hepatocytes [5, 6]. In addition, after stimulation with various agents, an increased release of sCD14 is observed from monocytes. This suggests that sCD14 could be used as a marker of monocyte/macrophage activation [7, 8]. The exact role of CD14 in normal and pathological situations is not completely known. Recent findings provide evidence that sCD14 expresses systemic anti-inflammatory effects and functions as a modulator of cellular and humoral immune responses [912].

Several studies have demonstrated a direct proteolytic effect of serine proteases, particularly neutrophil elastase (NE), on mCD14 resulting in the release of CD14 into the extracellular medium [7, 13]. α1-antitrypsin (AAT), a major inhibitor of NE in the lower respiratory system, is thought to play an essential role in limiting host tissue injury at sites of inflammation [14]. The clinical importance of AAT is highlighted by an increased risk of developing chronic inflammatory disease, in particular chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), in individuals with severe AAT deficiency, PiZZ [1518]. Severely decreased levels of AAT in subjects with AAT deficiency may result in increased activity of NE [19] with consequent proteolysis of immune cell membrane receptors, such as CD14, and release of soluble forms of those receptors. In addition, we have recently found that AAT also directly regulates CD14 expression and release in human monocytes in vitro. When cells were exposed for 18 h to a constant amount of AAT alone or in combination with LPS, CD14 and TLR4 mRNA expression was dramatically reduced compared to non-treated controls [20]. We hypothesize that AAT may play an important role in modulating sCD14 levels, both as an inhibitor of NE and as a direct regulator of CD14 expression and release, and, therefore, subjects with AAT deficiency may have higher CD14 expression than those with normal AAT levels. These considerations led us to examine plasma levels of sCD14 and blood monocyte mCD14 expression in clinically healthy young adults with PiSZ and PiZZ AAT deficiency relative to age and gender matched controls with normal PiMM AAT.

Methods

Study participants

This study included 204 individuals (98 males and 106 females) aged 30 (26–34) years. AAT-deficient subjects (n = 109; 75 PiZZ and 34 PiSZ) were recruited from the Swedish neonatal screening study [21]. Healthy age and gender matched controls (n = 95 PiMM) were randomly selected from the Swedish Population Registry. Data from physical examination and spirometry show that at the age of 30, individuals in this cohort have normal lung function [22]. In the PiMM group, 15 were current smokers and 16 ex-smokers; in the PiZZ groups 4 were smokers and 9 ex-smokers, and in the PiSZ groups 4 were ex-smokers. Informed consent was obtained from all individuals and the study was approved by the ethics committee, Lund University, Sweden and conducted according to the Helsinki Declaration.

Sample collection

Blood was collected in tubes containing sodium heparin or ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) (B-D Vaccutainer System, USA) and centrifuged at 2000×g at 4°C for 10 min. Plasma was immediately separated and frozen at -80°C and stored until assayed.

Isolation of monocytes

Blood monocytes were obtained from 26 individuals at age 32–34 years: PiMM (n = 11, 8 males and 3 females), PiZZ (n = 9, 5 males and 4 females) and PiSZ (n = 6, 4 males and 2 females). Monocytes were isolated using Ficoll-Paque PLUS (Pharmacia, Sweden) as described previously [23]. The cell number was determined by using an AC900EO Auto Counter (Swelab Instruments, AB, Sweden). The monocyte quantities in the preparations were greater than 70%. Cells were centrifuged at 300 g for 5 min, re-suspended in 2 ml fetal calf serum (FCS) containing 10% Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (Merck, Germany) and 5% D-Glucose-6-phosphate (Sigma, Germany) and stored in a freezer at -135°C (Revco, (Kendro), Bergman Labora, Sweden) until further analysis.

Culture of monocytes

Cells were thawed and plated in 24-well cell culture plates (Corning Incorporated, USA) at a density of 1 × 106cells/ml in RPMI 1640 (Gibco BRL, Life Technologies, Scotland) supplemented with 2 mM N-acetyl-l-alanyl-l-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, 1% non-essential amino acids, 2% sodium pyruvate and 20 mM Hepes (Fluka, Chemie AG, Switzerland) without serum at 37°C in 5% CO2. After 75 min, non-adherent cells were removed by washing with PBS supplemented with calcium and magnesium. Monocytes were then cultured in medium for 18 h at 37°C in 5% CO2.

Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) for CD14 expression

Monocyte CD14 expression was analysed by FACS. Cells were thawed and washed with PBS containing 2% FCS (Gibco BRL, Life Technologies, Scotland) and 0.01% NaN3 (VWR International Ltd., UK). Approximately 700,000 cells were incubated with 1.5 μg/ml FITC-conjugated anti-human CD14 antibody (Miltenyi Biotec, Germany) for 20 min in the dark at 4°C, washed and re-suspended in 300 μl PBS containing 2% FCS and 0.01% NaN3. FACS analysis was performed on a FACS Calibur (Becton Dickinson, USA) and data were processed using CellQuest Software (Becton Dickinson, USA).

Monocyte lysate preparation

Human blood monocytes isolated from 26 individuals were thawed, washed with PBS twice and then lysed in the SideStep lysis and stabilization buffer (Stratagene, Agilent Technologies Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) to a final concentration of 10.000 cells/μl. The SideStep buffer inactivates cellular nucleases and other enzymes, and the nucleic acids released into the buffer are stabilized and suitable for QRT-PCR analysis for at least 20 months when stored at -80°C.

Quantitative Real Time Reverse Transcription PCA Analysis

20 μl of each SideStep cell lysate was diluted 40-fold using SideStep buffer to a final concentration of 250 cells/μl. 1 μl of cell lysate was used in 25 μl QRT-PCR reaction with SideStep™ II QRT-PCR Master Mix Kit, 1-Step (Stratagene, Agilent Technologies Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA), TaqMan primers and probes (B2M, catalog # Hs99999907_M1 and CD14, catalog # Hs00169122_g; Assay on Demand, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) on the Mx3000P Real-time PCR System (Stratagene, Agilent Technologies Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Each 25 μl reaction mix comprises 12.5 μl of 2× Brilliant II QRT-PCR master mix, 1.25 μl of TaqMan primers and probe mix, 0.375 μl of ROX reference dye, 0.1 μl of RT/RNase block mix, 9.77 μl of nuclease-free PCR-grade H2O and 1 μl of cell lysate. All reactions were run in triplicate using the following cycling parameters: 50°C/30 min, then 95°C/10 min followed by 40 cycles of 95°C/15 sec; 60°C/60 sec. "No Reverse Transcription (RT) control" was included for each target using 1 μl of cell lysate in order to confirm that there is no amplification of genomic DNA. Relative mRNA quantification was performed using the MxPro software application "Comparative Quantification" on the Mx3000P normalized to β-macroglobulin gene (B2M).

Assays of sCD14

Plasma levels of sCD14 (n = 204) and culture supernatant levels of sCD14 in monocytes (n = 26) were measured using a commercially available sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits (R&D Systems, UK) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The minimum detection level for sCD14 was 250 pg/ml and the inter- and intra-assay coefficient of variation percentage (%CV) were 6.3% and 5.5% respectively.

Plasma analysis of C-reactive protein (CRP)

The concentration of plasma CRP was analysed (n = 199) at the Department of Clinical Chemistry in Malmoe (Malmoe University Hospital, Sweden) using high sensitivity method with minimum detection level of 0.2 mg/l.

Analysis of plasma AAT

Plasma AAT was analysed by nephelometry at the Department of Clinical Chemistry (Malmoe University Hospital, Sweden) or by rocket-immunoelectrophoresis described by Laurell [24]. In brief, aliquots of plasma were run for 1.5 h at 200 V on 1 mm 0.9% w/v agarose gels containing 11 mg/l anti-human AAT antibody (DakoCytomation, Denmark). Gels were pressed between filter papers and dried before staining with Coomassie Blue. To quantify AAT, the distance between the tip of the rocket-shaped immuno-precipitates and the application well, was measured. Standard curves were generated by serial dilutions of a standard (Seronorm, Sero AS, Norway) that was run in parallel to samples on every gel. The coefficient of variation percentage (%CV) for the inter- and intra-batch variability was 7.9% and 5.8% respectively.

Statistical analysis

The data were analysed using the Statistica software (Series1203b, version 6.1 for Windows, Statsoft®, USA), the SPSS software (version 12.0.1, for Windows, SPSS Inc., USA). All variables were analysed for the normal distribution by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.

The one-way ANOVA combined with a multiple-comparisons procedure (Scheffe multiple range test) was used to compare differences in means for both sCD14 and mCD14 and the unpaired Student's t-test was used to investigate differences in plasma sCD14 between genders within the three groups (MM, ZZ and SZ). The Student's t-test with correction for multiple comparisons was performed to evaluate the differences in CD14 mRNA expression level in MM, SZ and ZZ monocytes. Plasma AAT levels were analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis method for comparisons between more than two groups, and if significant, groups were compared by using the Mann-Whitney U test and corrected for multiple comparisons (Bonferroni). Tests with p < 0.05 were considered to be significant and data are presented as mean ± SEM or SD.

Results

Plasma levels of AAT, sCD14 and CRP

As expected, the levels of plasma AAT were significantly lower in ZZ subjects compared to both SZ and MM (p < 0.001). In agreement with previously published data [25] the concentrations of AAT were higher in MM and ZZ females than in males (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively). Interestingly, plasma sCD14 levels were higher in ZZ than in SZ (p < 0.05) and MM (p < 0.01) groups, but there was no difference in sCD14 levels found between MM and SZ groups. There was no difference in plasma sCD14 levels between males and females within the groups (Table 1). Increased levels of CRP indicate different inflammatory conditions. No significant difference was observed in mean CRP values between MM, ZZ and SZ (data not shown). Mean CRP was below the reference value (<3 mg/l) in all three groups.
Table 1

Plasma concentrations of sCD14 and AAT.

Pi group

sCD14 (μg/ml)

AAT (mg/ml)

 

Total

Males

Females

Total

Males

Females

MM

(n = 95)

1.26 ± 0.03

1.25 ± 0.05

(n = 38)

1.26 ± 0.03

(n = 57)

1.45 ± 0.04

1.35 ± 0.04II

(n = 38)

1.51 ± 0.06II

(n = 57)

ZZ

(n = 75)

1.40 ± 0.04*, ‡

1.38 ± 0.05

(n = 43)

1.43 ± 0.06

(n = 32)

0.24 ± 0.01†,§

0.22 ± 0.01**

(n = 43)

0.26 ± 0.01**

(n = 32)

SZ

(n = 34)

1.24 ± 0.04

1.24 ± 0.05

(n = 17)

1.24 ± 0.06

(n = 17)

0.61 ± 0.03

0.57 ± 0.02

(n = 17)

0.66 ± 0.05

(n = 17)

Abbreviations used: n, number of cases; sCD14, soluble CD14; AAT, α1-antitrypsin.

Results are mean ± SEM.

* p < 0.01 vs MM,

p < 0.001 vs MM,

p < 0.05 vs SZ,

§ p < 0.001 vs SZ,

II p < 0.05 between gender within group,

** p < 0.01 between gender within group.

Monocyte mCD14

Since CD14 is predominantly expressed on the surface of monocytes, we investigated the levels of mCD14 on blood monocytes isolated from PiMM (n = 11), PiZZ (n = 9) and PiSZ (n = 6) individuals. We first evaluated the distribution of all measured cell populations that comprise the peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). As shown in Figure 1A, lymphocytes and monocytes were differentiated by characteristic side and forward light-scattering properties and confirmed by CD14 staining. However, we found no differences among the PiMM, PiZZ and the PiSZ individuals when comparing the fraction of CD14+ cells with the total number of PBMC (Fig. 1A). We found no statistical difference in the expression of monocyte mCD14 among the groups, but the mean value of the fluorescence intensity (MFI) was 878.1 ± 51.2 and 742.7 ± 47.1 for PiZZ and PiSZ vs 714.5 ± 65.7 for the PiMM, suggesting a higher expression of mCD14 on monocytes from deficiency subjects (Fig. 1B).
Figure 1

A and B. (A) representative selection (R1) of CD14+ cells from the total leukocyte population; and (B) total CD14 fluorescence intensity in the selected CD14+ population. Cells were stained with a CD14 FITC-conjugated antibody and analysed with FACS (as described in methods). Monocytes obtained from AAT deficient individuals (ZZ and SZ) showed a tendency to express more membrane bound CD14 than MM cells. Data show one representative analysis from each group.

QRT-PCR analysis of mCD14 expression in monocytes

The expression level of CD14 mRNA was also evaluated by QRT-PCR in blood monocytes isolated from PiMM (n = 11), PiZZ (n = 9) and PiSZ (n = 6) individuals. To determine the amplification efficiencies of both reactions, a standard curve was generated using two-fold serial dilutions of the SideStep cell lysate. The amplification efficiencies of 100.8% and 100.6% were obtained for CD14 and reference B2M targets, respectively. No amplification signal was observed in "no RT control" reactions for both gene targets that confirmed that there was no amplification of genomic DNA. The threshold cycle differences (ΔCt) between the gene of interest (CD14) and the normalizer (B2M) were calculated for each sample and an average of ΔCt for each group of individuals was used to evaluate fold differences in CD14 expression using the delta-delta Ct (ΔΔCt) method. The relative quantity chart of CD14 mRNA expression in normal PiMM (n = 11) and deficient PiZZ (n = 9) monocytes showed that the CD14 expression level was significantly higher (1.89-fold) in PiZZ monocytes relative to normal PiMM (p = 0.00189). No significant difference was found between PiSZ and PiMM monocytes (p = 0.237) (Fig. 2).
Figure 2

The relative quantity of CD14 mRNA expression in normal (MM) and deficient (ZZ and SZ) monocytes after gene normalization using the "Comparative Quantification" application of MxPro software. CD14 expression level was significantly higher in the ZZ group compared to normal. Each bar represents mean ± SD of triplicate QRT-PCR reactions.

Levels of sCD14 in monocyte culture supernatants

Soluble CD14 levels in overnight monocyte-conditioned medium for PiZZ (n = 9), PiSZ (n = 6) and PiMM (n = 11) subjects were measured. As illustrated in Figure 3, the amount of sCD14 released by monocytes from PiZZ and PiSZ subjects (mean value 10.1 ± 2.7 and 10.5 ± 3.5 pg/μg protein, respectively) was higher than from PiMM monocytes (5.0 ± 0.9 pg/μg protein), but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.243 and p = 0.265, respectively).
Figure 3

The secretion of sCD14 from monocytes incubated for 18 h at 37°C. Monocytes isolated from ZZ and SZ subjects demonstrated a tendency to release higher levels of sCD14 than MM cells. Each bar represents mean ± SEM.

Discussion

The Z mutation of AAT leads to a conformational misfolding of the protein with accumulation in the endoplasmatic reticulum of hepatocytes and reduced export from the liver [26]. The consequent lack of circulating AAT in individuals with severe PiZZ AAT deficiency may lead to development of premature pulmonary emphysema and COPD. Pulmonary symptoms occur in the 3rd to 5th decade of life [27] and the progression of lung disease is markedly accelerated by cigarette smoking [28]. Because of both the lack of knowledge about the inflammatory processes in COPD and a lack of established biomarkers, it is not possible today to detect sub-clinical lung obstruction in time for preventive physician intervention that could limit lung tissue damage. Therefore, many of the COPD cases with AAT deficiency are undiagnosed or diagnosed too late. From 1972 to 1974, 200,000 Swedish newborns were screened for AAT deficiency. Those with severe (PiZZ) and moderate (PiSZ) deficiency having plasma levels of AAT that are 10–15% and 30–40% of the normal levels have been followed prospectively [21]. The important aims of this project were to study the natural history and pathophysiology of AAT deficiency in childhood and adolescence, and to prevent lung disease. Follow-up results of PiZZ and PiSZ individuals at age 30 indicate retention of normal lung function but with a higher prevalence of respiratory symptoms compared to age matched PiMM controls [22]. Currently there are no reliable clinical and/or biochemical parameters that allow us to predict who of those individuals will get COPD and emphysema. Therefore, studies aiming to improve our understanding of the basic mechanisms behind the development of COPD and to translate this to the diagnosis and/or the treatment are of great importance. We believe that the examination of the possible difference in cellular protein expression and the release profile between clinically healthy Z and M AAT subjects may improve our understanding of the mechanisms involved in the development of COPD.

To our knowledge, this study is the first to demonstrate significantly higher sCD14 levels in plasma from 30-year old PiZZ deficiency subjects compared to age matched PiSZ individuals and PiMM controls. It is important to note that this finding was not related to the levels of the inflammatory marker CRP nor to the smoking habits of our study participants. Our results also indicate that ZZ and SZ monocytes have higher surface expression of mCD14 and that these monocytes cultured over night release larger amounts of sCD14 than MM monocytes. Whether higher plasma levels of sCD14 and higher mCD14 expression in blood monocytes in the AAT deficient individuals reflect specific pathophysiological changes in these individuals and may be used as specific marker of inflammation remains to be proven.

Several studies have demonstrated a direct proteolytic effect of NE on mCD14 [13]. Individuals with severe AAT deficiency arising from lower plasma levels and decreased activity suffer a shortfall of NE inhibitor capacity. According to Ogushi and colleagues, Z type AAT-elastase complexes are less stable than M type AAT-elastase complexes and, compared to active M type AAT, active Z type AAT requires twice as long to inhibit neutrophil elastase [29]. Therefore, Z AAT individuals have uncontrolled elastase activity and increased susceptibility to emphysema as a result of these lower levels and dysfunction of the AAT protein. This supports the concept that lack of AAT may be the reason for the higher sCD14 shedding in subjects with severe AAT deficiency. Different assays usually fail to discriminate between free active elastase and elastase-inhibitor complexes. These limitations have hampered our investigations of the direct relationship between plasma levels of free NE and sCD14 in AAT deficiency subjects.

It is not yet known whether monocytes and macrophages are the major sources of sCD14, since hepatocytes also have been shown to produce sCD14 [5, 6]. Circulating AAT is primarily synthesized in the liver and secreted into the bloodstream [30]. Hepatocytes from Z AAT individuals may express greater amounts of cell-associated CD14 protein, and therefore more of the sCD14 is released resulting in an inverse link between plasma levels of Z AAT and sCD14 in AAT deficiency. Further studies will be needed to test these speculations.

The biological function of sCD14 is so far not clear. In vitro, an excess of sCD14 is shown to inhibit LPS binding to mCD14 and hence block cellular activation [11, 31]. It has also recently been shown that the response to low-dose LPS instilled intratracheally is completely dependent on CD14, whereas at higher doses the response is also dependent on CD11b [32]. Grunwald and collaborators have shown that binding of LPS to monocytes and LPS-induced cell activation are abrogated by an exogenously added high dose of sCD14 [33]. Moreover, injection of sCD14 has been shown to decrease endotoxin-induced mortality in a murine model [31]. It has also been demonstrated that intravenous injection of an anti-CD14 antibody attenuates LPS-induced lung injury [34]. It also appears that CD14 may be critical to LPS-induced airway disease and that macrophage CD14 is sufficient to initiate neutrophil recruitment into the airways but that CD14 may need to interact with other cell types [35].

Conclusion

CD14 is a pattern-recognition receptor that plays a central role in innate immunity and directs the adaptive immune responses. We for the first time demonstrate that clinically healthy young adults with PiZZ AAT deficiency have higher plasma sCD14 levels, show increased sCD14 release and higher mCD14 expression in peripheral blood monocytes as compared to age matched PiMM subjects. Our findings, therefore, argue strongly for further studies on relationship between CD14 expression, AAT deficiency and increased susceptibility of PiZZ subjects to develop emphysema.

List of abbreviations

AAT: 

α1-antitrypsin

COPD: 

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

CRP: 

c-reactive protein

LPS: 

Lipopolysacharride

sCD14: 

Soluble CD14

mCD14: 

Membrane CD14

NE: 

Neutrophil elastase

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all the participants included in the Swedish neonatal screening study and, E Szemberg Ringdahl and I Björk at the Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, for sample collection. In addition, the authors would like to thank Maria Walles at the Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology for finding helpful information in the AATD registry, UMAS, Malmoe, Sweden.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Clinical Sciences, Chronic and Degenerative Disease Research Unit, University Hospital Malmoe, Lund University
(2)
Stratagene, Agilent Technologies Company
(3)
Department of Clinical Sciences, Cellular Autoimmunity Unit, University Hospital Malmoe, Lund University
(4)
Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, University Hospital Malmoe, Lund University
(5)
Department of Clinical Sciences, Preventive Paediatrics, University Hospital Malmoe, Lund University

References

  1. Bas S, Gauthier BR, Spenato U, Stingelin S, Gabay C: CD14 is an acute-phase protein. J Immunol 2004,172(7):4470–4479.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ziegler-Heitbrock HW, Ulevitch RJ: CD14: cell surface receptor and differentiation marker. Immunol Today 1993,14(3):121–125.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Burgmann H, Winkler S, Locker GJ, Presterl E, Laczika K, Staudinger T, Knapp S, Thalhammer F, Wenisch C, Zedwitz-Liebenstein K, Frass M, Graninger W: Increased serum concentration of soluble CD14 is a prognostic marker in gram-positive sepsis. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 1996,80(3 Pt 1):307–310.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Takashi Kusunoki SDW Yasuhiro Inoue, Takeshi Miyanomae, Yoko Yoshida and Kozo Yoneda: Serum levels of soluble CD14 in allergic inflammation. Allergology International 1998, 47:271–278.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Liu S, Khemlani LS, Shapiro RA, Johnson ML, Liu K, Geller DA, Watkins SC, Goyert SM, Billiar TR: Expression of CD14 by hepatocytes: upregulation by cytokines during endotoxemia. Infect Immun 1998,66(11):5089–5098.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Vodovotz Y, Liu S, McCloskey C, Shapiro R, Green A, Billiar TR: The hepatocyte as a microbial product-responsive cell. J Endotoxin Res 2001,7(5):365–373.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bazil V, Strominger JL: Shedding as a mechanism of down-modulation of CD14 on stimulated human monocytes. J Immunol 1991,147(5):1567–1574.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Durieux JJ, Vita N, Popescu O, Guette F, Calzada-Wack J, Munker R, Schmidt RE, Lupker J, Ferrara P, Ziegler-Heitbrock HW, et al.: The two soluble forms of the lipopolysaccharide receptor, CD14: characterization and release by normal human monocytes. Eur J Immunol 1994,24(9):2006–2012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Haziot A, Rong GW, Bazil V, Silver J, Goyert SM: Recombinant soluble CD14 inhibits LPS-induced tumor necrosis factor-alpha production by cells in whole blood. J Immunol 1994,152(12):5868–5876.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kitchens RL, Thompson PA: Modulatory effects of sCD14 and LBP on LPS-host cell interactions. J Endotoxin Res 2005,11(4):225–229.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kitchens RL, Thompson PA, Viriyakosol S, O'Keefe GE, Munford RS: Plasma CD14 decreases monocyte responses to LPS by transferring cell-bound LPS to plasma lipoproteins. J Clin Invest 2001,108(3):485–493.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Rey Nores JE, Bensussan A, Vita N, Stelter F, Arias MA, Jones M, Lefort S, Borysiewicz LK, Ferrara P, Labeta MO: Soluble CD14 acts as a negative regulator of human T cell activation and function. Eur J Immunol 1999,29(1):265–276.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Le-Barillec K, Si-Tahar M, Balloy V, Chignard M: Proteolysis of monocyte CD14 by human leukocyte elastase inhibits lipopolysaccharide-mediated cell activation. J Clin Invest 1999,103(7):1039–1046.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Stoller JK, Aboussouan LS: Alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency. Lancet 2005,365(9478):2225–2236.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Statement: Standards for the Diagnosis and Management of Individuals with Alpha-1 Antitrypsin DeficiencyAm J Respir Crit Care Med 2003,168(7):818–900.Google Scholar
  16. Eden E, Mitchell D, Mehlman B, Khouli H, Nejat M, Grieco MH, Turino GM: Atopy, asthma, and emphysema in patients with severe alpha-1-antitrypysin deficiency. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997,156(1):68–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hendrick SJ, Silverman AK, Solomon AR, Headington JT: Alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency associated with panniculitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1988,18(4 Pt 1):684–692.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Mazodier P, Elzouki AN, Segelmark M, Eriksson S: Systemic necrotizing vasculitides in severe alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency. Qjm 1996,89(8):599–611.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Stockley RA, Bayley DL, Unsal I, Dowson LJ: The effect of augmentation therapy on bronchial inflammation in alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002,165(11):1494–1498.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Nita IM, Serapinas D, Janciauskiene SM: alpha1-Antitrypsin regulates CD14 expression and soluble CD14 levels in human monocytes in vitro. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2007,39(6):1165–1176.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Laurell CB, Sveger T: Mass screening of newborn Swedish infants for alpha antitrypsin deficiency. Am J Hum Genet 1975,27(2):213–217.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Bernspang E, Sveger T, Piitulainen E: Respiratory symptoms and lung function in 30-year-old individuals with alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency. Respir Med 2007,101(9):1971–1976.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Janciauskiene S, Moraga F, Lindgren S: C-terminal fragment of alpha1-antitrypsin activates human monocytes to a pro-inflammatory state through interactions with the CD36 scavenger receptor and LDL receptor. Atherosclerosis 2001,158(1):41–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Laurell CB: Quantitative estimation of proteins by electrophoresis in agarose gel containing antibodies. Anal Biochem 1966,15(1):45–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Welle I, Bakke PS, Eide GE, Fagerhol MK, Omenaas E, Gulsvik A: Increased circulating levels of alpha1-antitrypsin and calprotectin are associated with reduced gas diffusion in the lungs. Eur Respir J 2001,17(6):1105–1111.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Elliott PR, Bilton D, Lomas DA: Lung polymers in Z alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency-related emphysema. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 1998,18(5):670–674.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Brantly ML, Paul LD, Miller BH, Falk RT, Wu M, Crystal RG: Clinical features and history of the destructive lung disease associated with alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency of adults with pulmonary symptoms. Am Rev Respir Dis 1988,138(2):327–336.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Larsson C: Natural history and life expectancy in severe alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency, Pi Z. Acta Med Scand 1978,204(5):345–351.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Ogushi F, Fells GA, Hubbard RC, Straus SD, Crystal RG: Z-type alpha 1-antitrypsin is less competent than M1-type alpha 1-antitrypsin as an inhibitor of neutrophil elastase. J Clin Invest 1987,80(5):1366–1374.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Eriksson S, Alm R, Astedt B: Organ cultures of human fetal hepatocytes in the study of extra-and intracellular alpha1-antitrypsin. Biochim Biophys Acta 1978,542(3):496–505.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Stelter F, Pfister M, Bernheiden M, Jack RS, Bufler P, Engelmann H, Schutt C: The myeloid differentiation antigen CD14 is N- and O-glycosylated. Contribution of N-linked glycosylation to different soluble CD14 isoforms. Eur J Biochem 1996,236(2):457–464.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Jeyaseelan S, Chu HW, Young SK, Freeman MW, Worthen GS: Distinct roles of pattern recognition receptors CD14 and Toll-like receptor 4 in acute lung injury. Infect Immun 2005,73(3):1754–1763.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Grunwald U, Kruger C, Schutt C: Endotoxin-neutralizing capacity of soluble CD14 is a highly conserved specific function. Circ Shock 1993,39(3):220–225.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Tasaka S, Ishizaka A, Yamada W, Shimizu M, Koh H, Hasegawa N, Adachi Y, Yamaguchi K: Effect of CD14 blockade on endotoxin-induced acute lung injury in mice. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2003,29(2):252–258.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Brass DM, Hollingsworth JW, McElvania-Tekippe E, Garantziotis S, Hossain I, Schwartz DA: CD14 is an essential mediator of LPS-induced airway disease. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2007,293(1):L77–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Sandström et al. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement