Open Access

Shifting paradigms of nontuberculous mycobacteria in cystic fibrosis

  • Tavs Qvist1Email author,
  • Tania Pressler1,
  • Niels Høiby2 and
  • Terese L Katzenstein1
Respiratory Research201415:41

https://doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-15-41

Received: 1 November 2013

Accepted: 4 April 2014

Published: 11 April 2014

Abstract

Important paradigms of pulmonary disease with nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are currently shifting based on an increasing attention within the field of cystic fibrosis (CF). These shifts are likely to benefit the management of all patients with pulmonary NTM, regardless of underlying pathology. Currently several key areas are being revised: The first outbreak of human NTM transmission has been proven and new evidence of biofilm growth in vivo has been demonstrated. A better understanding of the clinical impact of NTM infection has led to increased diagnostic vigilance and new recommendations for lung transplantation are under way. While recent changes have reinvigorated the interest in NTM disease, the challenge remains, whether such advances can be successfully translated into improved management and care.

Keywords

NTM Nontuberculous mycobacteria Cystic fibrosis MABSC MAC Mycobacterium Abcessus Avium Massiliense Environmental mycobacteria MOTT Biofilm Transmission Lung transplantation

Background

Announced as the most important emerging threat to cystic fibrosis (CF) patients at the 2013 European Cystic Fibrosis Conference, the perception of nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) disease has once again undergone a notable shift. Previously thought of as a group of rather benign environmental bacteria associated with random colonization and only rarely with genuine infection of the airway [1], perceptions have now changed. Mycobacterium abscessus Complex (MABSC) and Mycobacterium avium Complex (MAC) are now recognized as insidious opportunists that can seriously affect morbidity and mortality in CF. Fundamental paradigms of NTM pulmonary disease concerning clinical impact, patient susceptibility, transmission, bacterial modes of growth and implications for lung transplantation are currently being revised. Such issues are not unique to CF and can be expected to affect NTM management in patients with other underlying pulmonary diseases. While great leaps have been made in understanding the scope and impact of NTM infections, advances in diagnostics and antibiotic management have been less impressive and still await the benefits of the heightened attention NTM disease is now receiving. Since 2007, the American Thoracic Society (ATS)’s and the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA)’s comprehensive statement on NTM disease has been the principle guide of management [2]. 2014 appears to be the year where the eagerly expected CF specific NTM guidelines will be published, hopefully building further consensus in a field void of solid empirical evidence and highlighting areas in urgent need of attention.

Biofilm growth

New evidence that rapidly growing NTM can grow in vivo as biofilms on intravascular catheters [3] could be an indication that biofilm growth in pulmonary NTM disease might also be a concern. Emerging evidence that pulmonary Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB) is a biofilm infection [4] and our group’s recent examination of explanted CF lungs from patients with MABSC [5], suggests that this might indeed be the case. MABSC has been shown to be capable of structured cord formation, a biofilm mode of growth, associated with the morphologically distinct rough growth pattern [6, 7]. This pattern is assumed to be similar to that proven for TB [8], suggesting that biofilm formation, is an inherent part of NTM pathogenesis in pulmonary disease. While phenotype switching of MABSC from smooth to rough has been linked to increased virulence [9], data on the genetic determinants of cord formation remain sparse. Future strategies might include using transposons for insertional mutagenesis [10], experimental lung models and sequential sequencing [11]. Addressing whether in vivo biofilm growth takes place in the CF lung could prove pivotal in explaining the notorious unreliability of in vitro susceptibility testing. The discrepancy between in vitro antibiotic resistance and the clinical benefit of treatment suggests that more than just antibiotic resistance is involved and that antibiotic tolerance, inferred by a protective biofilm coat could be present, in parallel with what is observed in other chronic infections [12, 13]. Demonstrating NTM biofilm growth in the human lung could also open up new treatment opportunities as biofilm disrupting targets could be systematically examined, something that has not previously been attempted for NTM.

Diagnostic challenges and opportunities

Identifying patients with NTM and clinical deterioration is difficult, but important, as these are the once most likely to benefit from antimycobacterial treatment. While conventional culture and acid-fast microscopy remain the backbone of mycobacterial diagnostics, some changes are under way, which could affect both the sensitivity and specificity of NTM diagnostics. New recommendations on NTM diagnostics are likely to include shorter time from sampling to culture, increased focus on routine screening, centralization of testing to larger mycobacteriological reference laboratories and validated pretreatment of samples to avoid Gram negative bacterial or fungal overgrowth. Several of these principles are already recommended, but not universally implemented [2]. MABSC, also called Mycobacterium abscessus sensu lato comprises the closely related species Mycobacterium asbcessus sensu stricto, Mycobacterium massiliense and Mycobacterium bolletii. Differentiation of the MABSC subspecies is difficult [14], and most clinical laboratories report infection with any of the three merely as M. abscessus. Historical variability in NTM taxonomy has only added to the confusion of how to correctly classify members of MABSC and MAC. Advances in molecular diagnostics and whole genome sequencing in particular, promise a brighter future for speciation, which is important in light of new insights into differences in virulence between subspecies. Importantly the subspecies M. massiliense remains susceptible to macrolides even after prolonged exposure, resulting from an inactivating erm (41) deletion [15]. Finally, immunological assays could prove useful as a means of monitoring NTM disease progression in a fashion similar to assays used in Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in CF [16, 17]. Thus, assays utilizing MABSC antigens-to-patient serum IgG have been shown to correlate with clinical disease [18, 19] and are currently being explored further for clinical use [20].

Prevalence and clinical impact

Reported prevalence rates have varied over time and geographically and are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Studies reporting the prevalence of nontuberculous mycobacteria in cystic fibrosis populations

Study

Study year

Location

Design

Included CF patients

NTM cases

NTM revalence

% MABSC

% MAC

Boxerbaum B.

1980

OH, USA

Prospective

430

8

1.8

75*

0

Smith MJ et al. [21]

1984

UK

Prospective

223

4

1.8

25*

0

Hjelte L et al. [22]

1990

Sweden

Prospective

54

5

9.2

0

60

Kilby JM et al. [23]

1992

NC, USA

Prospective

87

17

19.5

29*

76

Aitken ML et al. [24]

1993

WA, USA

Prospective

64

8

12.5

0

88

Hjelt K et al. [25]

1994

Denmark

Prospective

185

7

3.8

71*

29

Sermet-Gaudelus I et al. [26]

1996-99

France

Prospective

296

29

9.8

52

21

Fauroux B et al. [27]

1997

France

Prospective

106

7

6.6

43*

0

Mussaffi H et al. [28]

1997-02

Israel

Retrospective

139

12

8.6

67§

25§

Esther CR Jr et al. [29]

2000-07

NC, USA

Registry

1,216

166

13.7

41

59

Pierre-Audigier C et al. [30]

2000

France

Prospective

385

31

8.1

42

23

Oliver A et al. [19]

2000

Spain

Prospective

37

6

16.2

50*

33

Radhakrishnan et al. [31]

2004

Canada

Prospective

98

6

6.1

33

67

Levy I et al. [32]

2001-03

Israel

Cross-sectional

186

42

22.6

31

14

Olivier KN et al. [33]

2002

USA

Prospective

986

128

13.0

20

72

Roux AL et al. [34]

2004

France

Prospective

1,582

104

6.6

48

22

Valenza et al. [35]

2006

Germany

Prospective

60

8

13.3

50

50

Chalermskulrat W et al. [36]

2006

OH, USA

Retrospective

132

26

19.7

46

50

Binder AM et al. [37]

2011

USA

Registry

5,403

191

3.5

36

64

* = M. chelonae reported, but is here included as MABSC due to historical changes in taxonomy. § = percentage based on 6 chronic NTM cases.

Generally there has been a tendency towards higher prevalence rates being reported over time with a median prevalence rate of 9% (IQR: 3 – 11%) in the 9 studies initiated before 2000 and 13% (IQR: 7 – 17%) for the 10 post millennium prevalence studies. The reasons for this possible rise in NTM prevalence remain unknown, but could include changes in surveillance strategies although many centers are adamant that is not the case. Other reasons could include greater exposure [38], changes in the lung flora due to inhaled antibiotics [39], and reduced host immunity through autophagy inhibition during azithromycin treatment [40] or patient-to-patient transmission [15].

North American studies have consistently reported a higher proportion of MAC compared to MABSC [41], whereas the opposite is true for Western European studies [42], but the reasons for these geographical differences remain elusive. Another trend with some consistency, is that MABSC species, while isolated at all ages, seem to peak in prevalence in children, while MAC reaches the highest prevalence among adults [30, 43, 44], although this paradigm has been challenged [41]. Catherinot et al. have proposed that patient susceptibility might play a bigger role than previously thought, specifically pointing to an association between MABSC and more severe forms of CF [43]. Improved epidemiological surveillance such as the recent inclusion of NTM microbiology in the European CF registry will certainly be helpful in designing studies with the size required to address these questions.

While chronic MAC is not considered a critical threat to patient health, isolation of MABSC is often a real cause for concern. Some patients are diagnosed early on a routine mycobacterial culture, suggesting an initial phase of low to no clinical impact, which predates later loss of lung function [45]. Others develop chronic MABSC infection which can cause severe, sometimes fatal lung disease, even after an indolent period of several years [46]. A 2010 study from the US found that those infected with MABSC had a more rapid decline in lung function than their uninfected counterparts (3% per year vs. 2% per year) [29]. While the association with poor lung function is well established, the question of whether infection is mostly a consequence of, or a predisposing factor for poor lung function, remains unanswered. A 2014 study suggests that the rate of decline in FEV1 in the year leading up to the first positive culture may help distinguish patients who progress to active NTM disease and require treatment [41]. This study also reported that a quarter of patients cleared their NTM spontaneously [41] suggesting three phases of infection: Transient, persistent and active. Why some patients clear NTM suddenly without treatment, while others deteriorate rapidly warrants further investigation, as identifying who and when to treat remains the clinician’s central challenge in NTM management.

Transmission

The first solid evidence of patient-to-patient transmission of NTM in a UK CF center was published in 2013 [15]. The authors used whole-genome sequencing and showed, with a reasonable degree of certainty that the MABSC subsp. massiliense had spread within their center. Out of 31 patients nine shared one genetically near-identical strain and two patients shared another strain. A convincing case for in- and out-patient overlap as well as careful elimination of potential sources of contamination (such as the water supply and bronchoscopy equipment) was performed. The study thus confirms suspicions raised in a report from Seattle, USA, that indicated possible transmission of a single strain of M. massiliense, identified through the use of pulse-field gel electrophoresis and PCR [47] and a similar, but less cited report from Sweden [48]. Mapping the genetic population structure of MABSC is an urgent issue currently being examined by Floto et al. in a multicenter study. This is expected to have significant impact on how infection control is managed in the in- and out-patient clinic.

Lung transplantation

The view that NTM constitute an absolute contraindication for lung transplantation is being modified [49, 50]. Reports on outcome following lung transplantation in CF patients with NTM infection are few and the impact on mortality remains unknown, although increased morbidity is consistently reported [49, 51]. While aggressive treatment is recommended [2], eradication prior to transplantation is often unrealistic. Despite this, NTM disease does not preclude successful recovery after transplantation and new recommendations are expected to reflect this, bringing hope to a small, but growing number of patients, in desperate need of lung transplantation.

Antibiotic treatment

Since the important shift in the 1990s away from antituberculous regimes towards macrolide based multidrug therapy [52], not much new has been accomplished in the field of antibiotic treatment of NTM. A part from a current phase 2 trial of inhaled amikacin in the US, a recent Cochrane Review concluded, that not a single randomized trial comparing antibiotic treatment of NTM lung infection in CF has been completed [53]. NTM are notoriously difficult to treat and require multidrug treatment for 12 months or more. At present, ATS guidelines are widely accepted as the standard of care [2], but there are several ongoing controversies about MAC and MABSC disease that could benefit from an updated consensus. The superiority of one macrolide over another has not been demonstrated for MAC lung disease, nor has the benefit of routinely including an IV drug (amikacin) early on been demonstrated [2] and both issues remain undecided for newly diagnosed MAC. A preliminary trial from a non-CF setting suggests that a two-drug regimen of clarithromycin and ethambutol may be non-inferior to the recommended three-drug regimen, which today includes rifampicin [54].

The duration and intensity of antibiotic treatment for MABSC, especially in patients that do not clear the bacteria, remains a headache for most clinicians. Inhaled therapy is increasingly used in MABSC regimens and a recent retrospective study of inhaled amikacin found that while reductions in smear positivity and some symptomatic improvement were observed, toxicity was not uncommon [55]. Hopefully, preliminary results from the ongoing phase 2 trial of inhaled liposomal amikacin will be released in 2014. New CF specific treatment guidelines under way are not expected to change the fundamental structure of past MABSC recommendations, which consist of an initial induction phase followed by long maintenance therapy, but new regimens will likely include longer induction phases and generally more antibiotics, with azithromycin as the macrolide of choice. NTM specific drug-drug interactions, medication side-effects and nonadherence are also areas receiving fresh attention.

Conclusions

NTM seem to have found a successful niche in the structurally complex and often antibiotic rich environment of the CF lung. The central paradigms of how pulmonary NTM infection is initiated and how the disease progresses and interacts with the host have all shifted within the last years and upcoming consensus documents are eagerly awaited. While recent changes in the understanding of NTM disease have reinvigorated the field, the challenge remains, if such advances can be successfully translated into improved management and care.

Abbreviations

CF: 

Cystic fibrosis

NTM: 

Nontuberculous mycobacteria

MABSC: 

Mycobacterium abscessus complex

MAC: 

Mycobacterium avium complex

ATS: 

American Thoracic Society

IDSA: 

Infectious Disease Society of America

TB: 

Tuberculosis

IV: 

Intravenous.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Infectious Diseases, Cystic Fibrosis Center Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet
(2)
Department of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital Rigshospitalet

References

  1. Torrens JK, Dawkins P, Conway SP, Moya E: Non-tuberculous mycobacteria in cystic fibrosis. Thorax. 1998, 53 (0040–6376 (Print)): 182-185.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Griffith DE, Aksamit T, Brown-Elliott B a, Catanzaro A, Daley C, Gordin F, Holland SM, Horsburgh R, Huitt G, Iademarco MF, Iseman M, Olivier K, Ruoss S, von Reyn CF, Wallace RJ, Winthrop K, Wallace RJ: An official ATS/IDSA statement: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of nontuberculous mycobacterial diseases. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007, 175: 367-416. 10.1164/rccm.200604-571ST.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. El HG, Viola GM, Hachem R, Han XY, Raad II: Rapidly growing mycobacterial bloodstream infections. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013, 13 (1474–4457 (Electronic)): 166-174.Google Scholar
  4. Kulka K, Hatfull G, Ojha AK: Growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Biofilms. J Vis Exp. 2012, 60 (60): e3820-doi:10.3791/3820Google Scholar
  5. Qvist T, Eickhardt-Sørensen S, Pressler T, Katzenstein TL, Andersen CB, Iversen M, Bjarnsholt T, Hoiby N: First evidence of Mycobacterium abscessus biofilm in the lungs of chronically infected CF patients. J Cyst Fibros. 2013, 12 (Suppl. 1): S2-S2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Jönsson BE, Bylund J, Johansson BR, Telemo E, Wold AE: Cord-forming mycobacteria induce DNA meshwork formation by human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Pathog Dis. 2013, 67: 54-66. 10.1111/2049-632X.12007.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Howard ST, Rhoades E, Recht J, Pang X, Alsup A, Kolter R, Lyons CR, Byrd TF: Spontaneous reversion of Mycobacterium abscessus from a smooth to a rough morphotype is associated with reduced expression of glycopeptidolipid and reacquisition of an invasive phenotype. Microbiology. 2006, 152 (Pt 6): 1581-1590.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Giovannini D, Cappelli G, Jiang L, Castilletti C, Colone A, Serafino A, Wannenes F, Giaco L, Quintiliani G, Fraziano M, Nepravishta R, Colizzi V, Mariani F: A new Mycobacterium tuberculosis smooth colony reduces growth inside human macrophages and represses PDIM Operon gene expression. Does an heterogeneous population exist in intracellular mycobacteria?. Microb Pathog. 2012, 53 (1096–1208 (Electronic)): 135-146.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Catherinot E, Clarissou J, Etienne G, Ripoll F, Emile J-FF, Daffé M, Perronne C, Soudais C, Gaillard J-LL, Rottman M, Daffe M: Hypervirulence of a rough variant of the Mycobacterium abscessus type strain. Infect Immun. 2007, 75: 1055-1058. 10.1128/IAI.00835-06.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Pang JM, Layre E, Sweet L, Sherrid A, Moody DB, Ojha A, Sherman DR: The polyketide Pks1 contributes to biofilm formation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Bacteriol. 2012, 194: 715-721. 10.1128/JB.06304-11.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Kreutzfeldt KM, McAdam PR, Claxton P, Holmes A, Seagar AL, Laurenson IF, Fitzgerald JR: Molecular longitudinal tracking of Mycobacterium abscessus spp. during chronic infection of the human lung. PLoS One. 2013, 8: e63237-10.1371/journal.pone.0063237.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Bjarnsholt T, Jensen PO, Fiandaca MJ, Pedersen J, Hansen CR, Andersen CB, Pressler T, Givskov M, Hoiby N: Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms in the respiratory tract of cystic fibrosis patients. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2009, 44 (1099–0496 (Electronic)): 547-558.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Hoiby N, Ciofu O, Johansen HK, Song ZJ, Moser C, Jensen PO, Molin S, Givskov M, Tolker-Nielsen T, Bjarnsholt T: The clinical impact of bacterial biofilms. Int J Oral Sci. 2011, 3 (1674–2818 (Print)): 55-65.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Zelazny AM, Root JM, Shea YR, Colombo RE, Shamputa IC, Stock F, Conlan S, McNulty S, Brown-Elliott BA, Wallace RJ, Olivier KN, Holland SM, Sampaio EP: Cohort study of molecular identification and typing of Mycobacterium abscessus, Mycobacterium massiliense, and Mycobacterium bolletii. J Clin Microbiol. 2009, 47 (1098-660X (Electronic)): 1985-1995.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Bryant JM, Grogono DM, Greaves D, Foweraker J, Roddick I, Inns T, Reacher M, Haworth CS, Curran MD, Harris SR, Peacock SJ, Parkhill J, Floto RA: Whole-genome sequencing to identify transmission of Mycobacterium abscessus between patients with cystic fibrosis: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2013, 381 (1474-547X (Electronic)): 1551-1560.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Pressler T, Karpati F, Granström M, Knudsen PK, Lindblad A, Hjelte L, Olesen HV, Meyer P, Høiby N, Granstrom M, Hoiby N: Diagnostic significance of measurements of specific IgG antibodies to Pseudomonas aeruginosa by three different serological methods. J Cyst Fibros. 2009, 8 (1569–1993 (Print)): 37-42.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Pressler T, Bohmova C, Conway S, Dumcius S, Hjelte L, Hoiby N, Kollberg H, Tummler B, Vavrova V: Chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection definition: EuroCareCF Working Group report. J Cyst Fibros. 2011, 10 Suppl (10 Suppl): S75-S78. 1873–5010 (Electronic)View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Ferroni A, Sermet-Gaudelus I, Le Bourgeois M, Pierre-Audigier C, Offredo C, Rottman M, Guillemot D, Bernède C, Vincent V, Berche P, Gaillard J-LL, Le BM, Bernede C: Measurement of immunoglobulin G against Mycobacterial antigen A60 in patients with cystic fibrosis and lung infection due to Mycobacterium abscessus. Clin Infect Dis. 2005, 40 (1537–6591 (Electronic)): 58-66. 1537–6591 (Electronic)PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Oliver A, Maiz L, Canton R, Escobar H, Baquero F, Gomez-Mampaso E: Nontuberculous mycobacteria in patients with cystic fibrosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2001, 32 (1058–4838 (Print)): 1298-1303.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Qvist T, Pressler T, Katzenstein TL, Hoiby N: Elevated levels of antibodies against Mycobacterium abscessus in cystic fibrosis patients is associated with active lung disease. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2012, 3 (47 Suppl): 335-1099–0496 (Electronic)Google Scholar
  21. Smith MJ, Efthimiou J, Hodson ME, Batten JC: Mycobacterial isolations in young adults with cystic fibrosis. Thorax. 1984, 39: 369-375. 10.1136/thx.39.5.369.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Hjelte L, Petrini B, Källenius G, Strandvik B, Kallenius G: Prospective study of mycobacterial infections in patients with cystic fibrosis. Thorax. 1990, 45 (0040–6376 (Print)): 397-400.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Kilby JM, Gilligan PH, Yankaskas JR, Highsmith WE, Edwards LJ, Knowles MR: Nontuberculous mycobacteria in adult patients with cystic fibrosis. Chest. 1992, 102 (0012–3692 (Print)): 70-75.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Aitken ML: Nontuberculous mycobacterial disease in adult cystic fibrosis patients. CHEST J. 1993, 103: 1096-10.1378/chest.103.4.1096.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Hjelt K, Hojlyng N, Howitz P, Illum N, Munk E, Valerius NH, Fursted K, Hansen KN, Heltberg I, Koch C: The role of Mycobacteria Other Than Tuberculosis (MOTT) in patients with cystic fibrosis. Scand J Infect Dis. 1994, 26 (0036–5548 (Print)): 569-576.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Sermet-Gaudelus I, Le Bourgeois M, Pierre-Audigier C, Offredo C, Guillemot D, Halley S, Akoua-Koffi C, Vincent V, Sivadon-Tardy V, Ferroni A, Berche P, Scheinmann P, Lenoir G, Gaillard J-LL, Le BM: Mycobacterium abscessus and children with cystic fibrosis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003, 9: 1587-1591. 10.3201/eid0912.020774.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Fauroux B, Delaisi B, Clément A, Saizou C, Moissenet D, Truffot-Pernot C, Tournier G, Vu Thien H: Mycobacterial lung disease in cystic fibrosis: a prospective study. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1997, 16: 354-358. 10.1097/00006454-199704000-00004.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Mussaffi H, Rivlin J, Shalit I, Ephros M, Blau H: Nontuberculous mycobacteria in cystic fibrosis associated with allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis and steroid therapy. Eur Respir J. 2005, 25 (0903–1936 (Print)): 324-328.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Esther CR, Esserman DA, Gilligan P, Kerr A, Noone PG, Esther CR: Chronic Mycobacterium abscessus infection and lung function decline in cystic fibrosis. J Cyst Fibros. 2010, 9: 117-123. 10.1016/j.jcf.2009.12.001.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Pierre-Audigier C, Ferroni A, Sermet-Gaudelus I, Le BM, Offredo C, Vu-Thien H, Fauroux B, Mariani P, Munck A, Bingen E, Guillemot D, Quesne G, Vincent V, Berche P, Gaillard JL: Age-related prevalence and distribution of nontuberculous mycobacterial species among patients with cystic fibrosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2005, 43 (0095–1137 (Print)): 3467-3470.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Radhakrishnan DK, Yau Y, Corey M, Richardson S, Chedore P, Jamieson F, Dell SD: Non-tuberculous mycobacteria in children with cystic fibrosis: isolation, prevalence, and predictors. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2009, 44: 1100-1106. 10.1002/ppul.21106.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Levy I, Grisaru-Soen G, Lerner-Geva L, Kerem E, Blau H, Bentur L, Aviram M, Rivlin J, Picard E, Lavy A, Yahav Y, Rahav G: Multicenter cross-sectional study of nontuberculous mycobacterial infections among cystic fibrosis patients, Israel. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008, 14: 378-384. 10.3201/eid1403.061405.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Olivier KN, Weber DJ, Wallace RJ, Faiz AR, Lee JH, Zhang Y, Brown-Elliot BA, Handler A, Wilson RW, Schechter MS, Edwards LJ, Chakraborti S, Knowles MR: Nontuberculous mycobacteria. I: multicenter prevalence study in cystic fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003, 167 (1073-449X (Print)): 828-834.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Roux AL, Catherinot E, Ripoll F, Soismier N, Macheras E, Ravilly S, Bellis G, Vibet MA, Le RE, Lemonnier L, Gutierrez C, Vincent V, Fauroux B, Rottman M, Guillemot D, Gaillard JL: Multicenter study of prevalence of nontuberculous mycobacteria in patients with cystic fibrosis in france. J Clin Microbiol. 2009, 47 (1098-660X (Electronic)): 4124-4128.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Valenza G, Tappe D, Turnwald D, Frosch M, König C, Hebestreit H, Abele-Horn M: Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of microorganisms isolated from sputa of patients with cystic fibrosis. J Cyst Fibros. 2008, 7: 123-127. 10.1016/j.jcf.2007.06.006.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Chalermskulrat W, Sood N, Neuringer IP, Hecker TM, Chang L, Rivera MP, Paradowski LJ, Aris RM: Non-tuberculous mycobacteria in end stage cystic fibrosis: implications for lung transplantation. Thorax. 2006, 61 (0040–6376 (Print)): 507-513.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Binder AM, Adjemian J, Olivier KN, Prevots DR: Epidemiology of nontuberculous mycobacterial infections and associated chronic macrolide use among persons with cystic fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013, 188: 807-812. 10.1164/rccm.201307-1200OC.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Feazel LM, Baumgartner LK, Peterson KL, Frank DN, Harris JK, Pace NR: Opportunistic pathogens enriched in showerhead biofilms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009, 106 (1091–6490 (Electronic)): 16393-16399.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Saiman L, Siegel J: Infection control in cystic fibrosis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004, 17 (0893–8512 (Print)): 57-71.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Renna M, Schaffner C, Brown K, Shang S, Tamayo MH, Hegyi K, Grimsey NJ, Cusens D, Coulter S, Cooper J, Bowden AR, Newton SM, Kampmann B, Helm J, Jones A, Haworth CS, Basaraba RJ, Degroote MA, Ordway DJ, Rubinsztein DC, Floto RA: Azithromycin blocks autophagy and may predispose cystic fibrosis patients to mycobacterial infection. J Clin Invest. 2011, 121 (1558–8238 (Electronic)): 3554-3563.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Martiniano SL, Sontag MK, Daley CL, Nick JA, Sagel SD: Clinical significance of a first positive nontuberculous mycobacteria culture in cystic fibrosis. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014, 11: 36-44. 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201309-310OC.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Russell CD, Claxton P, Doig C, Seagar A-L, Rayner A, Laurenson IF: Non-tuberculous mycobacteria: a retrospective review of Scottish isolates from 2000 to 2010. Thorax. 2013, Epub ahead of printGoogle Scholar
  43. Catherinot E, Roux AL, Vibet MA, Bellis G, Ravilly S, Lemonnier L, Le RE, Bernede-Bauduin C, Le BM, Herrmann JL, Guillemot D, Gaillard JL: Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium abscessus complex target distinct cystic fibrosis patient subpopulations. J Cyst Fibros. 2013, 12 (1873–5010 (Electronic)): 74-80.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Esther CR, Henry MM, Molina PL, Leigh MW: Nontuberculous mycobacterial infection in young children with cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2005, 40 (8755–6863 (Print)): 39-44.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Olivier KN, Weber DJ, Lee J-HH, Handler A, Tudor G, Molina PL, Tomashefski J, Knowles MR: Nontuberculous mycobacteria. II: nested-cohort study of impact on cystic fibrosis lung disease. Am J RespirCrit Care Med. 2003, 167 (1073-449X (Print)): 835-840.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Cullen AR, Cannon CL, Mark EJ, Colin AA: Mycobacterium abscessus infection in cystic fibrosis. Colonization or infection?. Am J RespirCrit Care Med. 2000, 161 (1073-449X (Print)): 641-645.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Aitken ML, Limaye A, Pottinger P, Whimbey E, Goss CH, Tonelli MR, Cangelosi GA, Dirac MA, Olivier KN, Brown-Elliott BA, McNulty S, Wallace RJ: Respiratory outbreak of Mycobacterium abscessus subspecies massiliense in a lung transplant and cystic fibrosis center. Am J RespirCrit Care Med. 2012, 185 (1535–4970 (Electronic)): 231-232.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Jonsson BE, Gilljam M, Lindblad A, Ridell M, Wold AE, Welinder-Olsson C: Molecular epidemiology of Mycobacterium abscessus, with focus on cystic fibrosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2007, 45 (0095–1137 (Print)): 1497-1504.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Qvist T, Pressler T, Thomsen VO, Skov M, Iversen M, Katzenstein TL: Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Disease Is Not a Contraindication to Lung Transplantation in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis: A Retrospective Analysis in a Danish Patient Population. Transplant Proc. 2012, 45 (1873–2623 (Electronic)): 342-345.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Gilljam M, Schersten H, Silverborn M, Jonsson B, Ericsson HA: Lung transplantation in patients with cystic fibrosis and Mycobacterium abscessus infection. J Cyst Fibros. 2010, 9 (1873–5010 (Electronic)): 272-276.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Chernenko SM, Humar A, Hutcheon M, Chow CW, Chaparro C, Keshavjee S, Singer LG: Mycobacterium abscessus infections in lung transplant recipients: the international experience. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2006, 25 (1557–3117 (Electronic)): 1447-1455.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Griffith DE: Therapy of nontuberculous mycobacterial disease. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2007, 20 (0951–7375 (Print)): 198-203.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Waters V, Ratjen F: Antibiotic treatment for nontuberculous mycobacteria lung infection in people with cystic fibrosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012, 12 (1469-493X (Electronic)): CD010004-PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Miwa S, Shirai M, Toyoshima M, Shirai T, Yasuda K, Yokomura K, Yamada T, Masuda M, Inui N, Chida K, Suda T, Hayakawa H: Efficacy of clarithromycin and ethambutol for Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease. A preliminary study. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014, 11: 23-9. 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201308-266OC.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Olivier KN, Shaw PA, Glaser TS, Bhattacharyya D, Fleshner M, Brewer CC, Zalewski CK, Folio LR, Siegelman JR, Shallom S, Park IK, Sampaio EP, Zelazny AM, Holland SM, Prevots DR: Inhaled amikacin for treatment of refractory pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacterial disease. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014, 11: 30-5. 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201307-231OC.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Qvist et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement