Open Access

Improving physical activity in COPD: towards a new paradigm

  • Thierry Troosters1, 2Email author,
  • Thys van der Molen3,
  • Michael Polkey4,
  • Roberto A Rabinovich5,
  • Ioannis Vogiatzis6,
  • Idelle Weisman7 and
  • Karoly Kulich8
Respiratory Research201314:115

https://doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-14-115

Received: 29 May 2013

Accepted: 22 August 2013

Published: 30 October 2013

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a debilitating disease affecting patients in daily life, both physically and emotionally. Symptoms such as dyspnea and muscle fatigue, lead to exercise intolerance, which, together with behavioral issues, trigger physical inactivity, a key feature of COPD. Physical inactivity is associated with adverse clinical outcomes, including hospitalization and all-cause mortality. Increasing activity levels is crucial for effective management strategies and could lead to improved long-term outcomes. In this review we summarize objective and subjective instruments for evaluating physical activity and focus on interventions such as pulmonary rehabilitation or bronchodilators aimed at increasing activity levels. To date, only limited evidence exists to support the effectiveness of these interventions. We suggest that a multimodal approach comprising pulmonary rehabilitation, pharmacotherapy, and counselling programs aimed at addressing emotional and behavioural aspects of COPD may be an effective way to increase physical activity and improve health status in the long term.

Keywords

Physical activityBronchodilatorsPulmonary rehabilitationCOPDActivity monitors

Introduction

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a debilitating and progressive disease that primarily affects the respiratory system. In many patients, it also has detrimental extra-pulmonary effects, such as weight loss and skeletal muscle dysfunction/wasting [1]. The pulmonary and skeletal muscle abnormalities limit the pulmonary ventilation and enhance the ventilatory requirements during exercise resulting in exercise-associated symptoms such as dyspnea and fatigue. These symptoms make exercise an unpleasant experience, which many patients try to avoid, and along with a depressive mood status (in up to 30% of patients), further accelerates the process, leading to an inactive life-style. Muscle deconditioning, associated with reduced physical activity, contributes to further inactivity and as a result patients get trapped in a vicious cycle of declining physical activity levels and increasing symptoms with exercise (Figure 1) [13].
Figure 1

The vicious cycle of inactivity and symptoms.

Physical activity levels are remarkably lower in stable outpatients with COPD than in healthy individuals [46]; even in patients with early-stages disease [79]. At a group level, increasing severity of COPD is associated with decreasing physical activity [9]. Physical activity level is recognized as a predictor of mortality and hospitalization in patients with COPD and contributes to disease progression and poor outcomes [10]. Increasing activity levels may improve long-term outcomes as seen in other chronic conditions such as diabetes [11].

This review will summarize the characteristics of instruments used to assess physical activity in COPD and discuss the important implications of physical inactivity in this context, with a particular focus on interventions aimed at helping patients become more physically active in daily life. The review was based on a literature search of the PubMed database (no date limits) for COPD and terms relating to exercise and physical activity.

Physical activity levels recommendation and applications in COPD

The recently developed World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines for physical activity recommend that all adults should undertake at least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic activity per week, such as walking, to maintain a healthy lifestyle [12]. Individuals limited by medical conditions are advised to undertake as much physical activity as their health allows. A joint statement from the American Thoracic Society and the European Respiratory Society in 2006 states that pulmonary rehabilitation 'should no longer be viewed as a “last ditch” effort for patients with severe respiratory impairment. Rather, it should be an integral part of the clinical management of all patients with chronic respiratory disease, addressing their functional and/or psychologic deficits’ [13]. An update of this document, recently accepted for publication, will further stress the importance of physical activity and improvement of physical activity as a goal for pulmonary rehabilitation. The more recent 2013 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) strategy recommends that all patients with COPD should participate in daily physical activity, although recommended levels have not been defined [2]. Despite these recommendations, a recent Swedish study demonstrated that significantly fewer patients with COPD attained recommended physical activity levels compared with a healthy population and patients with other chronic diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis or diabetes [14].

Evaluation of physical activity

It is important to make the distinction between physical activity and exercise capacity, which are both closely related to clinical outcomes in COPD. Physical activity is 'any bodily movement produced by skeletal muscles that results in energy expenditure’ [15]. By contrast, exercise capacity indicates an individual’s ability to endure exercise, where exercise comprises physical activities that are specifically performed with the intention of improving physical fitness. Exercise capacity indicates what a person is capable of doing, while physical activity reflects what someone actually does.

Physical activity can be assessed by direct observation, evaluation of energy expenditure during bodily movement, physical activity questionnaires and patient diaries, and the use of performance based motion sensors. Direct observation is a time-consuming and intrusive method, and therefore not suitable for assessing physical activity in large populations [16]. Energy spent on physical activities can be assessed by indirect calorimetry such as the doubly labeled water method [17]; however, body mass, movement efficiency, and the energy cost of activities, make inter-individual comparison of the amount of physical activity performed difficult. Furthermore, the quantity, duration, frequency and intensity of physical activity cannot be discriminated. Moreover, patients with COPD have a poor mechanical efficiency yielding larger energy expenditure compared to healthy subjects for the same level of activity [18].

Subjective instruments for assessing physical activity

Specifically designed questionnaires and diaries are subjective measures that have been used to quantify physical activity in daily life [19, 20]. These tools are helpful for evaluating the patients’ perspectives on their ability to carry out daily activities. Self-reported questionnaires and diaries rely on memory and recall of the patients [21, 22] and several variables such as the design of the questionnaire [23], patient characteristics (age, cognitive capacity, cultural factors) [16, 21, 24] and interviewer characteristics [16] may affect the reliability of the results. It has been shown that patients’ estimation of time spent on physical activities in daily life disagreed with objective assessment [25].

The most frequently used subjective tools with a better-documented validation include the Minnesota Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire (MLTPAQ) or Survey (MLTPAS) [26], the Baecke Physical Activity Questionnaire [27, 28], Follick’s diary [29], the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) [30, 31] and the Zutphen Physical Activity Questionnaire (ZPAQ) [32]. A recent study in which the utility of four questionnaires was compared against accelerometry in COPD found the Stanford to be more reliable than the PASE, Zutphen or Baecke [33]. Unfortunately the association between measured PA and the questionnaires outcomes was poor for all questionnaires. Web-based applications, which require less time than paper-based questionnaires to be completed by patients, have also been developed [34]. A unique project aimed at developing and validating patient reported outcome tools to investigate dimensions of physical activity that are judged as being essential by patients, is currently underway (PROactive; physical activity as a crucial patient reported outcome in COPD) and is due to be completed in 2014 [12]. This project is exploring the development of tools that will capture daily physical activity from the patient perspective to reflect their experiences of physical activity.

Objective instruments

The clinical evaluation and validation of objective measures of assessing physical activity continues to be investigated. The PROactive project has identified available physical activity monitors [35]. Motion sensors, which include pedometers used for measuring steps and accelerometers used for detecting body acceleration, can be used for the objective quantification of physical activity over time [16]. Although pedometers may underestimate the amount of physical activity, particularly slow-walking [36], and offer no information on the pattern of physical activity or the time spent in different activities [37], several studies have shown that they can capture physical activity in patients with COPD [3840].

Accelerometers are electronic devices, generally worn on the arm (multisensory armband devices) or waist, which estimate physical activity outcomes such as body posture, quantity and intensity of body movements, energy expenditure, and physical activity level based on measurements of body’s acceleration [41].

Evidence for the reliability, validity and responsiveness of accelerometers is still limited in the COPD population [9, 16]. Accelerometers are also limited by the cost, poor patient acceptance of some models [42], sensitivity to artefacts [16], observation bias [43] and compliance issues [43]. However, a recent multicentre study reported good compliance with wearing the devices and limited technical problems [44]. Despite these limitations, two recent studies [45, 46] provide a framework to validate activity monitors for use in patients with chronic disease, evaluating compliance, usability, validity in the field setting and in a laboratory setting. Three of six monitors tested met all prespecified validity criteria and can be used to assess physical activity levels of patients with COPD. Physical activity is variable from day to day, which is a challenge to clinical trial designs. More studies elaborating on how physical activity monitor outcomes can be assessed and reported is needed. Guidance is available from a recent series of papers endorsed by the American College of Sports Medicine [47].

Implications of physical inactivity in COPD

Physical inactivity is one of the most potent predictors of mortality in COPD [48, 49]. A population-based study found that all levels of regular physical activity were associated with an adjusted lower risk of all-cause mortality and respiratory mortality (Figure 2) [50]. Low levels of physical activity have been associated with a higher risk of hospitalization and re-hospitalization [48, 50, 51]. In a prospective study in 173 patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD, patients with low physical activity levels (measured objectively) had a shorter time to first COPD admission versus those with higher activity levels [48]. Patients are particularly inactive during and after hospitalization for an acute exacerbation, and physical inactivity soon after discharge has been shown to increase the probability of readmission within the following year [52].
Figure 2

Regular physical activity reduces hospital admissions (upper panel A) and all-cause death (lower panel B) [50]. Kaplan-Meier curves according to level of regular physical activity during follow-up. Patients with COPD from the Copenhagen City Heart Study (n=2386), recruited from 1981 and followed to 2000. Reproduced from [50] with permission from BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

It has been shown that the level of physical activity is the most important factor in determining self-rated general health and HRQoL in patients with COPD, with the most physically active patients reporting the best health and HRQoL [4, 53]. Over a five year study period, patients who maintained moderate or high levels of physical activity or increased their physical activity had an improved HRQoL, and patients who had a low level of physical activity experienced significant declines in HRQoL [53]. Further, a cross-sectional, survey-based study with over 1500 patients with COPD reported that the probability of having better self-rated general health increased 2.4–7.7-fold and the likelihood of experiencing psychological distress declined by around 50% with higher physical activity levels [4]. Overall, patients with COPD who are more physically active have generally better functional status in terms of diffusing capacity of the lung carbon monoxide, expiratory muscle strength, exercise capacity, maximal oxygen uptake and systemic inflammation, compared with those who are less active [10].

Considering this relationship between physical activity and meaningful patient outcomes, improving physical activity levels is an important goal in the management of COPD.

Interventions to improve physical activity

Pulmonary rehabilitation and the modification of patient behavior

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) aims to break the vicious cycle illustrated in Figure 1. PR programs are multidisciplinary programs that are built around an exercise training intervention. Exercise training aims to reverse the systemic consequences of COPD, in particular the skeletal muscle dysfunction, enhances the mechanical efficiency of physical activities (particularly walking) and reduces the sensitivity to dyspnea [54] and the ventilation required to overcome a specific task [55]. PR also appears to have a beneficial effect on patients’ experience of physical activity, e.g. by reducing fear and allowing them to increase activities [56].

PR programs have shown varying results with respect to their effect on physical activity. Three studies, both short-term (3 weeks) and longer-term (6–12 weeks) did not find an increase in the level of physical activity after the PR programs [5759]. However, three studies reported a significant increase in physical activity after PR for the same duration [6062]. Issues regarding the measurement properties of the activity monitors, the best site (or sites) to wear the motion detectors, and the optimal variable to analyze (movement intensity/duration, estimated steps, estimated energy expenditure, etc.) may all play a role. Only recently have studies of these motion detector devices in COPD begun to emerge [45, 46]. Although exercise training may confer a significant increase in physical activities [63], these improvements are smaller than expected if considering that exercise training can result in a substantial increase in exercise endurance [8].

In healthy subjects, behavioral and environmental factors are associated with physical activity levels (Reviewed in Bauman et al. [64]). It has been hypothesized that the reduced physical activity levels in patients with COPD may potentially have a behavioral element and some patients may opt to limit their activity levels rather than be restricted by their symptoms [65]. In a study with COPD patients, a counseling program that used pedometers to monitor and motivate patients to increase their level of physical activity was offered to a group of out-clinic patients [39]. After 12 weeks, the patients who received counseling showed a significant increase in the number of steps per-day and a significant improvement in arm and leg strength, HRQoL, and changes in intrinsic motivation score to be physically active compared with patients who received usual care. Other studies have shown that counseling programs and pulmonary rehabilitation or structured exercise programs can be complementary [38, 66]. More recently internet based programs have found their way to the COPD population [67]. These programs provide feedback to patients and may foster the creation of social networks that invite to be physically active.

Pharmacotherapy

Dynamic hyperinflation, which is associated with reduced physical activity levels [68, 69], is improved with bronchodilator therapy [70], indicating indirectly that bronchodilation could result in increased physical activity. Indeed, this had been suggested by Casaburi et al. in a trial assessing the effect of tiotropium on exercise endurance. Patients receiving tiotropium showed significantly longer exercise endurance time at the conclusion of pulmonary rehabilitation compared to patients in the placebo control group [71]. Notably, a following study suggested that tiotropium could amplify the effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation as shown by the increase in patient self-reported participation in physical activities. A subsequent sub-analysis of the Understanding Potential Long-term Impacts on Lung Function with Tiotropium (UPLIFT) trial indicated that therapy with tiotropium was effective in improving the QoL of patients with COPD, particularly with regard to the SGRQ domain of physical activity [72].

Compared with a control group, tiotropium amplified the effectiveness of PR in patients with severe and very-severe COPD as demonstrated by increases in patient self-reported participation in physical activities outside the PR program [73]. A recent study investigated the impact of tiotropium added to budesonide/formoterol (combination of inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting beta-2 agonist) in patients with COPD [74]. Significant improvements were observed in the morning activities as assessed by the Capacity of Daily Living during the Morning (CDLM) questionnaire (total score and for individual questions) with tiotropium added to budesonide/formoterol compared with tiotropium alone (Figure 3). This finding is of particular interest in COPD since patients report that morning symptoms are most challenging and heavily impact social and physical activities [75].
Figure 3

Change in morning activities (absolute scores) over treatment period with budesonide/formoterol plus tiotropium versus placebo plus tiotropium [74]. CDLM: Capacity of Daily Living during the Morning questionnaire; dotted line represents budesonide/formoterol plus tiotropium; solid line represents placebo plus tiotropium; CDLM score at run-in budesonide/formoterol plus tiotropium: 4.09, placebo plus tiotropium: 4.13; treatment comparison from randomization to first week of treatment; treatment comparison from randomization to last week of treatment. Reprinted with permission of the American Thoracic Society. Copyright © 2013 American Thoracic Society. Welte T, Miravitlles M, Hernandez P, Eriksson G, Peterson S, Polanowski T, et al: Efficacy and tolerability of budesonide/formoterol added to tiotropium in patients withchronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2009, 180:741–750. Official journal of the American Thoracic Society.

Results from a large multi-center trial designed to evaluate the impact of pharmacologic intervention with tiotropium on lung function and the amount of physical activity using an activity monitoring device in patients with GOLD stage II COPD [76] who are not receiving maintenance therapy are awaited [77]. An additional focus of the study will be to assess if efforts to improve physical activity levels early in the course of the disease may contribute to reducing the burden of the morbidity in patients with COPD.

The way forward

As discussed, the link between bronchodilation, PR, maximal physical performance and physical activity is far from clear-cut. The evidence presented suggests that PR programs may enhance physical activity, but effects are heterogeneous across studies. Longer programs, or the inclusion of targeted behavioral interventions may be needed in order to ensure that patients make significant improvements in physical activity in daily life as exercise training alone is unlikely to alter physical activity behavior.[78]. Nevertheless, studies conducted in patients with mild, moderate and severe COPD have shown a positive impact of PR programs on exercise tolerance and exercise induced symptoms, which could potentially lead patients to become more active in daily life [7982]. This evidence argues in favor of the adoption of PR in patients with a wide range of COPD severities, including mild COPD, in line with the GOLD 2013 recommendation [2].

Although several studies have assessed the impact of bronchodilators on hyperinflation and exercise endurance capacity in COPD [8385], evidence on the impact of bronchodilators on physical activity is still scarce. A study in 23 COPD patients evaluating the effect of indacaterol on physical activity measured by an accelerometer over 4 weeks suggested that bronchodilator therapy can improve physical activity [86]. However, when activity level were measured using a sensewear arm band device in a larger study conducted in 90 COPD patients, treatment with indacaterol failed to show any significant improvement versus placebo [87]. The duration of the treatment, differences in the target population and sub-optimal data processing could have played a role in the discrepancies between the two studies. Based on existing evidence, isolated bronchodilator therapy seems unlikely to achieve increases in physical activity, since even PR is often considered to have an inconsistent effect on daily physical activity levels [8891], unless provided for a prolonged period [78, 92]. On a conceptual level, it is possible that bronchodilators could be effective in patients whose main obstacle to physical activity is dyspnea. However, it is also probable that bronchodilators have no effect on physical activity unless combined with some sort of behavioral intervention and/or PR. Preliminary evidence suggests that a counseling program can increase activities of daily living in the absence or presence of a PR program [38, 39]. Further investigation to assess the extent to which this should become a standard part of both the physical and pharmacological therapy of COPD is warranted.

It is interesting to note that several interventions that enhance exercise capacity do not seem to have an effect on physical activity. This could be due to several factors including the choice of patient inclusion criteria and tools used to assess physical activity in clinical trials. In designing future studies investigating physical activity in patients with COPD, it may be desirable to stratify participants by physical activity levels measured objectively. As the relationship between GOLD stage and physical activity level is ambiguous [5, 9, 93], direct measurement of physical activity levels or use of a questionnaire surrogate [33] in future studies will better aid stratification than forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1). In addition, new tools able to capture physical activity from the patient’s perspective are required. Currently available tools measure the amount of physical activity, but they fail to capture the full patient experience of physical activity with regards to symptoms, which have a considerable impact and, to a certain degree, will determine to what extent patients engage in the activities. A comprehensive patient-centered approach combining objective information on the amount of activity with subjective patient experience could be beneficial as it may also help identify the barriers to physical activity in patients with COPD. This may assist in the development of new and comprehensive interventions with the specific aim of increasing physical activity.

Conclusion

Physical activity is reduced in patients with COPD. This is associated with a higher risk of hospital admission and an increased risk of mortality, and also places patients with COPD at risk of developing comorbidities. Importantly, physical activity is a potentially modifiable risk factor. It follows that improving physical activity allows the patients to take a productive part in daily life and may also confer long term health benefits. The assessment of physical activity and the interpretation of results is an area that has garnered considerable interest. Both subjective and objective instruments for evaluating physical activity have advantages and disadvantages. Patient compliance, appropriate assessment period, and accurate interpretation of data are essential for a precise estimation of daily physical activity. There is limited and inconsistent evidence on the effectiveness of interventions (PR and bronchodilators) for improving physical activity. These inconsistencies may be partly due to patient choice and whether they choose to maintain the life style options explained during their pulmonary rehabilitation. A combination of individualized PR programs and pharmacotherapy in conjunction with behavioral modification may be the way forward to help patients adopt a more active lifestyle.

Abbreviations

CDLM: 

Capacity of daily living during the morning

COPD: 

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

FEV1: 

Forced expiratory volume in one second

GOLD: 

Global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease

HRQoL: 

Health-related quality of life

MLTPAQ: 

Minnesota leisure time physical activity questionnaire

MLTPAS: 

Minnesota leisure time physical activity survey

PA: 

Physical activity

PASE: 

Physical activity scale for the elderly

PR: 

Pulmonary rehabilitation

PRO: 

Patient reported outcomes

QoL: 

Quality of life

UPLIFT: 

Understanding potential long-term impacts on lung function with tiotropium

WHO: 

World health organization

ZPAQ: 

Zutphen physical activity questionnaire.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors were assisted in the preparation of this manuscript by Roberta Sottocornola, a professional medical writer from CircleScience (Macclesfield, UK) and Mark J. Fedele from Novartis.

MIP’s contribution to this manuscript was supported by the NIHR Respiratory Disease Biomedical Research Unit at the Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, who part fund his salary and Imperial College London. Writing support was funded by Novartis Pharma AG.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Pulmonary Rehabilitation and Respiratory Division, UZ Gasthuisberg
(2)
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven
(3)
University of Groningen University Medical Center
(4)
NIHR Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, National Heart and Lung Institute (Imperial College)
(5)
ELEGI Colt Laboratory, Centre for Inflammation Research. The Queen’s Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh
(6)
Department of Physical Education & Sport Sciences and 1st Department of Respiratory Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
(7)
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
(8)
Novartis Pharma AG

References

  1. Cooper CB: Airflow obstruction and exercise. Respir Med. 2009, 103: 325-334. 10.1016/j.rmed.2008.10.026.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease: Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. 2013, http://www.goldcopd.com,Google Scholar
  3. Polkey MI, Moxham J: Attacking the disease spiral in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clin Med. 2006, 6: 190-196. 10.7861/clinmedicine.6-2-190.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Arne M, Lundin F, Boman G, Janson C, Janson S, Emtner M: Factors associated with good self-rated health and quality of life in subjects with self-reported COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2011, 6: 511-519.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Pitta F, Troosters T, Spruit MA, Probst VS, Decramer M, Gosselink R: Characteristics of physical activities in daily life in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005, 171: 972-977. 10.1164/rccm.200407-855OC.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Vorrink SN, Kort HS, Troosters T, Lammers JW: Level of daily physical activity in individuals with COPD compared with healthy controls. Respir Res. 2011, 12: 33-10.1186/1465-9921-12-33.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Shrikrishna D, Patel M, Tanner RJ, Seymour JM, Connolly BA, Puthucheary ZA, et al: Quadriceps wasting and physical inactivity in patients with COPD. Eur Respir J. 2012, 40: 1115-1122. 10.1183/09031936.00170111.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Troosters T, Sciurba F, Battaglia S, Langer D, Valluri SR, Martino L, et al: Physical inactivity in patients with COPD, a controlled multi-center pilot-study. Respir Med. 2010, 104: 1005-1011. 10.1016/j.rmed.2010.01.012.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Watz H, Waschki B, Meyer T, Magnussen H: Physical activity in patients with COPD. Eur Respir J. 2009, 33: 262-272.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Garcia-Aymerich J, Serra I, Gomez FP, Farrero E, Balcells E, Rodriguez DA, et al: Physical activity and clinical and functional status in COPD. Chest. 2009, 136: 62-70. 10.1378/chest.08-2532.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE, Hamman RF, Lachin JM, Walker EA, et al: Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med. 2002, 346: 393-403.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. World Health Organization: Global recommendation on physical activity for health. http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/publications/9789241599979/en/index.html,
  13. Nici L, Donner C, Wouters E, Zuwallack R, Ambrosino N, Bourbeau J, et al: American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement on pulmonary rehabilitation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006, 173: 1390-1413. 10.1164/rccm.200508-1211ST.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Arne M, Janson C, Janson S, Boman G, Lindqvist U, Berne C, et al: Physical activity and quality of life in subjects with chronic disease: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease compared with rheumatoid arthritis and diabetes mellitus. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2009, 27: 141-147. 10.1080/02813430902808643.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GM: Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Rep. 1985, 100: 126-131.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Pitta F, Troosters T, Probst VS, Spruit MA, Decramer M, Gosselink R: Quantifying physical activity in daily life with questionnaires and motion sensors in COPD. Eur Respir J. 2006, 27: 1040-1055. 10.1183/09031936.06.00064105.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Schutz Y, Weinsier RL, Hunter GR: Assessment of free-living physical activity in humans: an overview of currently available and proposed new measures. Obes Res. 2001, 9: 368-379. 10.1038/oby.2001.48.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Baarends EM, Schols AM, Pannemans DL, Westerterp KR, Wouters EF: Total free living energy expenditure in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997, 155: 549-554. 10.1164/ajrccm.155.2.9032193.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Hartman JE, Boezen HM, de Greef MH, Bossenbroek L, ten Hacken NH: Consequences of physical inactivity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2010, 4: 735-745. 10.1586/ers.10.76.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Kocks JW, Kerstjens HA, Snijders SL, De VB, Biermann JJ, Van HP, et al: Health status in routine clinical practice: validity of the clinical COPD questionnaire at the individual patient level. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010, 8: 135-10.1186/1477-7525-8-135.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Lichtman SW, Pisarska K, Berman ER, Pestone M, Dowling H, Offenbacher E, et al: Discrepancy between self-reported and actual caloric intake and exercise in obese subjects. N Engl J Med. 1992, 327: 1893-1898. 10.1056/NEJM199212313272701.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Washburn RA, Heath GW, Jackson AW: Reliability and validity issues concerning large-scale surveillance of physical activity. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2000, 71: S104-S113.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Sarkin JA, Nichols JF, Sallis JF, Calfas KJ: Self-report measures and scoring protocols affect prevalence estimates of meeting physical activity guidelines. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000, 32: 149-156.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Shephard RJ: Assessment of physical activity and energy needs. Am J Clin Nutr. 1989, 50: 1195-1200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Pitta F, Troosters T, Spruit MA, Decramer M, Gosselink R: Activity monitoring for assessment of physical activities in daily life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005, 86: 1979-1985. 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.04.016.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Taylor HL, Jacobs DR, Schucker B, Knudsen J, Leon AS, Debacker G: A questionnaire for the assessment of leisure time physical activities. J Chronic Dis. 1978, 31: 741-755. 10.1016/0021-9681(78)90058-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Baecke JA, Burema J, Frijters JE: A short questionnaire for the measurement of habitual physical activity in epidemiological studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 1982, 36: 936-942.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Voorrips LE, Ravelli AC, Dongelmans PC, Deurenberg P, Van Staveren WA: A physical activity questionnaire for the elderly. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1991, 23: 974-979.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Follick MJ, Ahern DK, Laser-Wolston N: Evaluation of a daily activity diary for chronic pain patients. Pain. 1984, 19: 373-382. 10.1016/0304-3959(84)90083-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Washburn RA, Smith KW, Jette AM, Janney CA: The Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE): development and evaluation. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993, 46: 153-162. 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90053-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Washburn RA, McAuley E, Katula J, Mihalko SL, Boileau RA: The physical activity scale for the elderly (PASE): evidence for validity. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999, 52: 643-651. 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00049-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Caspersen CJ, Bloemberg BP, Saris WH, Merritt RK, Kromhout D: The prevalence of selected physical activities and their relation with coronary heart disease risk factors in elderly men: the Zutphen Study, 1985. Am J Epidemiol. 1991, 133: 1078-1092.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Garfield BE, Canavan JL, Smith CJ, Ingram KA, Fowler RP, Clark AL, et al: Stanford Seven-Day Physical Activity Recall questionnaire in COPD. Eur Respir J. 2012, 40: 356-362. 10.1183/09031936.00113611.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Scheers T, Philippaerts R, Lefevre J: Assessment of physical activity and inactivity in multiple domains of daily life: a comparison between a computerized questionnaire and the SenseWear Armband complemented with an electronic diary. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012, 9: 71-10.1186/1479-5868-9-71.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Van RH, Giavedoni S, Raste Y, Burtin C, Louvaris Z, Gimeno-Santos E, et al: Validity of activity monitors in health and chronic disease: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012, 9: 84-10.1186/1479-5868-9-84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Cyarto EV, Myers A, Tudor-Locke C: Pedometer accuracy in nursing home and community-dwelling older adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004, 36: 205-209. 10.1249/01.MSS.0000113476.62469.98.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Benzo R: Activity monitoring in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2009, 29: 341-347. 10.1097/HCR.0b013e3181be7a3c.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. de Blok BM, de Greef MH, ten Hacken NH, Sprenger SR, Postema K, Wempe JB: The effects of a lifestyle physical activity counseling program with feedback of a pedometer during pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with COPD: a pilot study. Patient Educ Couns. 2006, 61: 48-55. 10.1016/j.pec.2005.02.005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Hospes G: Bossenbroek L, ten Hacken NH, van HP, de Greef MH: Enhancement of daily physical activity increases physical fitness of outclinic COPD patients: results of an exercise counseling program. Patient Educ Couns. 2009, 75: 274-278. 10.1016/j.pec.2008.10.005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Schonhofer B, Ardes P, Geibel M, Kohler D, Jones PW: Evaluation of a movement detector to measure daily activity in patients with chronic lung disease. Eur Respir J. 1997, 10: 2814-2819. 10.1183/09031936.97.10122814.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Glaab T, Vogelmeier C, Buhl R: Outcome measures in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): strengths and limitations. Respir Res. 2010, 11: 79-10.1186/1465-9921-11-79.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Fensli R, Pedersen PE, Gundersen T, Hejlesen O: Sensor acceptance model - measuring patient acceptance of wearable sensors. Methods Inf Med. 2008, 47: 89-95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Casaburi R: Activity monitoring in assessing activities of daily living. COPD. 2007, 4: 251-255. 10.1080/15412550701480158.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Waschki B, Spruit MA, Watz H, Albert PS, Shrikrishna D, Groenen M, et al: Physical activity monitoring in COPD: compliance and associations with clinical characteristics in a multicenter study. Respir Med. 2012, 106: 522-530. 10.1016/j.rmed.2011.10.022.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Van RH, Raste Y, Louvaris Z, Giavedoni S, Burtin C, Langer D, et al: Validity of six activity monitors in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a comparison with indirect calorimetry. PLoS One. 2012, 7: e39198-10.1371/journal.pone.0039198.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Rabinovich RA, Louvaris Z, Raste Y, Langer D, Remoortel HV, Giavedoni S, et al: Validity of physical activity monitors during daily life in patients with COPD. Eur Respir J. 2013, Epub ahead of printGoogle Scholar
  47. Matthews CE, Hagstromer M, Pober DM, Bowles HR: Best practices for using physical activity monitors in population-based research. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012, 44: S68-S76.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Garcia-Rio F, Rojo B, Casitas R, Lores V, Madero R, Romero D, et al: Prognostic value of the objective measurement of daily physical activity in patients with COPD. Chest. 2012, 142: 338-346. 10.1378/chest.11-2014.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Waschki B, Kirsten A, Holz O, Muller KC, Meyer T, Watz H, et al: Physical activity is the strongest predictor of all-cause mortality in patients with COPD: a prospective cohort study. Chest. 2011, 140: 331-342. 10.1378/chest.10-2521.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Garcia-Aymerich J, Lange P, Benet M, Schnohr P, Anto JM: Regular physical activity reduces hospital admission and mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a population based cohort study. Thorax. 2006, 61: 772-778. 10.1136/thx.2006.060145.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Bahadori K, FitzGerald JM: Risk factors of hospitalization and readmission of patients with COPD exacerbation–systematic review. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2007, 2: 241-251.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Pitta F, Troosters T, Probst VS, Spruit MA, Decramer M, Gosselink R: Physical activity and hospitalization for exacerbation of COPD. Chest. 2006, 129: 536-544. 10.1378/chest.129.3.536.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Esteban C, Quintana JM, Aburto M, Moraza J, Egurrola M, Perez-Izquierdo J, et al: Impact of changes in physical activity on health-related quality of life among patients with COPD. Eur Respir J. 2010, 36: 292-300. 10.1183/09031936.00021409.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Lacasse Y, Martin S, Lasserson TJ, Goldstein RS: Meta-analysis of respiratory rehabilitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A Cochrane systematic review. Eura Medicophys. 2007, 43: 475-485.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Troosters T, Casaburi R, Gosselink R, Decramer M: Pulmonary rehabilitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005, 172: 19-38. 10.1164/rccm.200408-1109SO.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Williams V, Bruton A, Ellis-Hill C, McPherson K: The effect of pulmonary rehabilitation on perceptions of breathlessness and activity in COPD patients: a qualitative study. Prim Care Respir J. 2010, 19: 45-51. 10.4104/pcrj.2009.00044.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Coronado M, Janssens JP, De MB, Terrier P, Schutz Y, Fitting JW: Walking activity measured by accelerometry during respiratory rehabilitation. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2003, 23: 357-364. 10.1097/00008483-200309000-00006.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Dallas MI, McCusker C, Haggerty MC, Rochester CL, Zuwallack R: Using pedometers to monitor walking activity in outcome assessment for pulmonary rehabilitation. Chron Respir Dis. 2009, 6: 217-224.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Steele BG, Belza B, Hunziker J, Holt L, Legro M, Coppersmith J, et al: Monitoring daily activity during pulmonary rehabilitation using a triaxial accelerometer. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2003, 23: 139-142. 10.1097/00008483-200303000-00011.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Mercken EM, Hageman GJ, Schols AM, Akkermans MA, Bast A, Wouters EF: Rehabilitation decreases exercise-induced oxidative stress in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005, 172: 994-1001. 10.1164/rccm.200411-1580OC.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Sewell L, Singh SJ, Williams JE, Collier R, Morgan MD: Can individualized rehabilitation improve functional independence in elderly patients with COPD?. Chest. 2005, 128: 1194-1200. 10.1378/chest.128.3.1194.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Walker PP, Burnett A, Flavahan PW, Calverley PM: Lower limb activity and its determinants in COPD. Thorax. 2008, 63: 683-689. 10.1136/thx.2007.087130.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Cindy Ng LW, Mackney J, Jenkins S, Hill K: Does exercise training change physical activity in people with COPD? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Chron Respir Dis. 2012, 9: 17-26. 10.1177/1479972311430335.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Bauman AE, Reis RS, Sallis JF, Wells JC, Loos RJ, Martin BW: Correlates of physical activity: why are some people physically active and others not?. Lancet. 2012, 380: 258-271. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60735-1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Polkey MI, Rabe KF: Chicken or egg: physical activity in COPD revisited. Eur Respir J. 2009, 33: 227-229.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Ringbaek T, Brondum E, Martinez G, Lange P: Rehabilitation in COPD: the long-term effect of a supervised 7-week program succeeded by a self-monitored walking program. Chron Respir Dis. 2008, 5: 75-80. 10.1177/1479972307087366.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Moy ML, Weston NA, Wilson EJ, Hess ML, Richardson CR: A pilot study of an Internet walking program and pedometer in COPD. Respir Med. 2012, 106: 1342-1350. 10.1016/j.rmed.2012.06.013.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Garcia-Rio F, Lores V, Mediano O, Rojo B, Hernanz A, Lopez-Collazo E, et al: Daily physical activity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is mainly associated with dynamic hyperinflation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009, 180: 506-512. 10.1164/rccm.200812-1873OC.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Lahaije AJ, van Helvoort HA, Dekhuijzen PN, Heijdra YF: Physiologic limitations during daily life activities in COPD patients. Respir Med. 2010, 104: 1152-1159. 10.1016/j.rmed.2010.02.011.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. O'Donnell DE, Laveneziana P, Ora J, Webb KA, Lam YM, Ofir D: Evaluation of acute bronchodilator reversibility in patients with symptoms of GOLD stage I COPD. Thorax. 2009, 64: 216-223. 10.1136/thx.2008.103598.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Casaburi R, Kukafka D, Cooper CB, Witek TJ, Kesten S: Improvement in exercise tolerance with the combination of tiotropium and pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with COPD. Chest. 2005, 127: 809-817. 10.1378/chest.127.3.809.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Troosters T, Celli B, Lystig T, Kesten S, Mehra S, Tashkin DP, et al: Tiotropium as a first maintenance drug in COPD: secondary analysis of the UPLIFT trial. Eur Respir J. 2010, 36: 65-73. 10.1183/09031936.00127809.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Kesten S, Casaburi R, Kukafka D, Cooper CB: Improvement in self-reported exercise participation with the combination of tiotropium and rehabilitative exercise training in COPD patients. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2008, 3: 127-136.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  74. Welte T, Miravitlles M, Hernandez P, Eriksson G, Peterson S, Polanowski T, et al: Efficacy and tolerability of budesonide/formoterol added to tiotropium in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009, 180: 741-750. 10.1164/rccm.200904-0492OC.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Partridge MR, Karlsson N, Small IR: Patient insight into the impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the morning: an internet survey. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009, 25: 2043-2048. 10.1185/03007990903103006.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease: Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. 2010, http://www.goldcopd.com,Google Scholar
  77. Troosters T, Weisman I, Dobbels F, Giardino N, Valluri SR: Assessing the Impact of Tiotropium on Lung Function and Physical Activity in GOLD Stage II COPD Patients who are Naive to Maintenance Respiratory Therapy: A Study Protocol. Open Respir Med J. 2011, 5: 1-9. 10.2174/1874306401105010001.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  78. Pitta F, Troosters T, Probst VS, Langer D, Decramer M, Gosselink R: Are patients with COPD more active after pulmonary rehabilitation?. Chest. 2008, 134: 273-280. 10.1378/chest.07-2655.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  79. Berry MJ, Rejeski WJ, Adair NE, Zaccaro D: Exercise rehabilitation and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease stage. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999, 160: 1248-1253. 10.1164/ajrccm.160.4.9901014.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Clark CJ, Cochrane LM, Mackay E, Paton B: Skeletal muscle strength and endurance in patients with mild COPD and the effects of weight training. Eur Respir J. 2000, 15: 92-97. 10.1183/09031936.00.15109200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  81. Lacasse Y, Goldstein R, Lasserson TJ, Martin S: Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006, 4: CD003793-PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Rossi G, Florini F, Romagnoli M, Bellantone T, Lucic S, Lugli D, et al: Length and clinical effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation in outpatients with chronic airway obstruction. Chest. 2005, 127: 105-109. 10.1378/chest.127.1.105.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  83. O'Donnell DE, Sciurba F, Celli B, Mahler DA, Webb KA, Kalberg CJ, et al: Effect of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol on lung hyperinflation and exercise endurance in COPD. Chest. 2006, 130: 647-656. 10.1378/chest.130.3.647.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  84. O'Donnell DE, Fluge T, Gerken F, Hamilton A, Webb K, Aguilaniu B, et al: Effects of tiotropium on lung hyperinflation, dyspnoea and exercise tolerance in COPD. Eur Respir J. 2004, 23: 832-840. 10.1183/09031936.04.00116004.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  85. Stav D, Raz M: Effect of N-acetylcysteine on air trapping in COPD: a randomized placebo-controlled study. Chest. 2009, 136: 381-386. 10.1378/chest.09-0421.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  86. Hataji O, Naito M, Ito K, Watanabe F, Gabazza EC, Taguchi O: Indacaterol improves daily physical activity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2013, 8: 1-5.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  87. O'Donnell DE, Casaburi R, Vincken W, Puente-Maestu L, Swales J, Lawrence D, et al: Effect of indacaterol on exercise endurance and lung hyperinflation in COPD. Respir Med. 2011, 105: 1030-1036. 10.1016/j.rmed.2011.03.014.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  88. Behnke M, Wewel AR, Kirsten D, Jorres RA, Magnussen H: Exercise training raises daily activity stronger than predicted from exercise capacity in patients with COPD. Respir Med. 2005, 99: 711-717. 10.1016/j.rmed.2004.10.016.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  89. Breyer MK, Breyer-Kohansal R, Funk GC, Dornhofer N, Spruit MA, Wouters EF, et al: Nordic walking improves daily physical activities in COPD: a randomised controlled trial. Respir Res. 2010, 11: 112-10.1186/1465-9921-11-112.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  90. Mador MJ, Patel AN, Nadler J: Effects of pulmonary rehabilitation on activity levels in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2011, 31: 52-59. 10.1097/HCR.0b013e3181ebf2ef.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  91. Probst VS, Kovelis D, Hernandes NA, Camillo CA, Cavalheri V, Pitta F: Effects of 2 exercise training programs on physical activity in daily life in patients with COPD. Respir Care. 2011, 56: 1799-1807. 10.4187/respcare.01110.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  92. der PJ V, Van DV, Effing T, Zielhuis G, Kerstjens H: Community based physiotherapeutic exercise in COPD self-management: a randomised controlled trial. Respir Med. 2011, 105: 418-426. 10.1016/j.rmed.2010.09.017.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  93. Watz H, Waschki B, Boehme C, Claussen M, Meyer T, Magnussen H: Extrapulmonary effects of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on physical activity: a cross-sectional study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008, 177: 743-751. 10.1164/rccm.200707-1011OC.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Troosters et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement