Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of variables of MII-pH between two groups

From: Positive effect of deep diaphragmatic breathing training on gastroesophageal reflux-induced chronic cough: a clinical randomized controlled study

 

Training group (n = 30)

Control group (n = 30)

Test results

DeMeester score

16.64 (3.38;24.05)

13.39 (4.64;23.06)

Z=-0.621, P = 0.535

AET (%)

5.61 (0.90;8.03)

5.84 (2.83;6.98)

Z=-0.200, P = 0.842

Acid SAP (%)

96.65 (18.60;99.53)

97.80 (19.48;100.00)

Z=-0.736, P = 0.464

Non-acid SAP (%)

22.70 (0.00;99.80)

21.35 (5.23;99.80)

Z=-0.703, P = 0.482

SI (%)

59.70 (28.35;79.48)

63.15 (31.50;87.68)

Z=-0.421, P = 0.673

Acidic reflux (n)

71.00 (17.25;95.25)

76.50 (24.75;108.25)

Z=-0.326, P = 0.717

Weakly acidic reflux (n)

40.00 (9.75;82.50)

29.00 (12.00;72.75)

Z=-0.015, P = 0.988

Weakly alkaline reflux (n)

6.50 (3.00;24.00)

9.50 (2.75;24.00)

Z-0.318, P = 0.750

Gas reflux (n)

37.50 (19.25;61.50)

42.00 (19.75;71.00)

Z=-0.422, P = 0.673

Liquid reflux (n)

48.50 (18.50;77.00)

44.00 (28.50;64.75)

Z=-0.303, P = 0.762

Mixed reflux (n)

33.00 (12.75;56.25)

36.00 (19.75;67.50)

Z=-0.673, P = 0.501

Proximal extent (n)

11.00 (7.75;22.00)

14.50 (6.00;22.00)

Z=-0.600, P = 0.549

Total number of reflux episodes (n)

110.50 (97.25;207.25)

131.50 (101.50;157.75)

Z=-0.924, P = 0.355

  1. Data are presented as median (Q1; Q3)
  2. AET, acid exposure time; SAP, symptom association probability; SI, symptom index; n, number of times. DeMeester score was automatically reported by Database software as a global measure of esophageal acid exposure. Proximal extent was defined as the number of reflux events reaching ≥ 15 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter