Skip to main content

Table 1 Correspondence between interpretative phenomenological analysis [13] and quantitative lexicometric analysis

From: "In their own words": delineating the contours of dyspnea invisibility in patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease from quantitative discourse analysis

 

Interpretative phenomenological analysis – Themes

Quantitaive

lexicometric

analysis – Semantic classes* (hierarchical descending classification)

Quantitaive

lexicometric

analysis – Semantic communities

(similarity analysis)

Category #1

Living with COPD-related dyspnea

Theme #1

Envisioning one's death by suffocation

Class#1

Experience and need for understanding

Class#4

Hospitalization

Community#3

Thing

Community#5

Hospitalization

Community#6

Feel

Theme #2

Losing autonomy and hope

Class#2

Limitations

Community#6

Problem

Theme #3

Coping strategies

Class#3

Management

Community#2

Take

Theme #4

Being exhausted by a long-lasting burden

 

Community#3

Thing

Category #2

Dyspnea invisibilities

Theme #5

Having been fooled by the insidious nature of dyspnea as a warning sign

 

Community#4

Disease

Community#1

Seeing

Theme #6

Others' lack of awareness

Class#1 **

Experience and need for understanding

Community#1

Seeing

Community#4

Disease

Theme #7

An unshareable life experience

 

Community#7

Feel

Theme #8

A suffering that cannot be objectively measured

 

Community#4

Disease

Theme #9

Others' lack of empathetic concern

 

Community#1

Seeing

Community#4

Disease

  1. *words pertaining to dyspnea invisibilities were present in the four semantic classes. ** Class#1 contained words pertinent to the 5 "dyspnea invisibilities" theme. Primary correspondences in black, secondary correspondence in gray