Fig. 3From: Validation of at-the-bedside formulae for estimating ventilator driving pressure during airway pressure release ventilation using computer simulationBland–Altman plots showing estimation error versus true ΔP across the cohort of 90 virtual adult ARDS patients, with \({P}_{high}\)= 30 cmH2O and \({P}_{low}\) = 5 cmH2O. Solid lines indicate the average deviation (‘Bias’) between the true and estimated value of ΔP, dashed lines indicate the limits of agreement (LOA, the distribution of values within ± 1.96 standard deviation from the mean) A ΔP estimated by switching to volume controlled ventilation (as described in [2]), assuming that the monitoring PEEP recorded is exactly equal to the actual total expiratory pressure. B ΔP estimated using Eqs. (6) and (7), under the assumption that flow, volume and pressure decay mono-exponentially, as proposed in [7]. C ΔP estimated using Eqs. (4) and (5) as proposed in [6], under the assumption that the time taken to achieve full expiration and eliminate PEEPi (i.e., achieve zero expiratory flow) is equal to 4 expiratory time constants \(\tau .\) D ΔP estimated as in C but under the assumption that the time taken to eliminate PEEPi is equal to 3 expiratory time constants \(\tau\)Back to article page