Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison between the changes in CQAP parameters and risk reduction rate over 3 years

From: Influence of government-driven quality assessment program on patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

 

AS

NAS

Risk reduction rate in AS compared to NAS

P-value

Clinical practice parameters

 PFT conduction rate

 + 14.6%

 + 12.1%

− 2.4%

 < 0.001

 Inhaled LAMA prescription rate

 + 14.9%

 + 54.5%

 + 25.8%

 < 0.001

 Inhaled LABA prescription rate

 + 8.1%

 + 4.6%

− 3.5%

 < 0.001

 ICS prescription rate

− 2.4%

− 2.2%

 + 0.2%

 < 0.001

 SABA prescription rate

− 41.9%

 + 4.4%

 + 44.6%

 < 0.001

Prognosis

 Frequency of admission for COPD

− 3.6%

 + 22.0%

 + 21.2%

 < 0.001

 All-cause mortality in the next year

− 0.3%

 + 65.2%

 + 40.7%

 < 0.001

  1. AS, assessed subjects; NAS, not-assessed subjects; PFT, pulmonary function test; LAMA, long-acting muscarine antagonist; LABA, long-acting β2 agonist; ICS, inhaled corticosteroid; SABA, short-acting β2 agonist