Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of selected studies

From: Characterizing undiagnosed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

 

Country

Study type

Population

Definition of COPD

Definition of undiagnosed COPD

Participants with COPD

Percentage undiagnosed

Quality rating

Ancochea et al. (2013) [21]

Spain

Cross-sectional (EPI-SCANa)

General Population, random sample

Post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.7

Spirometric obstruction and no previous diagnosis of COPD (self-reported)

386

73%

Good

Balcells et al. (2015) [3]

Spain

Prospective cohort study

Hospitalized patients, all eligible patients were invited

Post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.7, 3 months after discharge

Spirometric obstruction and no diagnosis of respiratory disease or regular use of pharmacological respiratory treatment (self-reported)

342

34%

Good

Herrera et al. (2016) [25]

Argentina, Colombia, Venezuela, Uruguay

Cross-sectional

Primary care clinics, convenience sample

Post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.7 and LLN

Spirometric obstruction and no previous diagnosis of chronic bronchitis, emphysema, or COPD (self-reported)

309

77%

Fair

Hill et al. (2010) [29]

Canada

Cross-sectional

Primary care clinics, convenience sample

Post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.7 and FEV1 < 80% predicted

Spirometric obstruction and no previous diagnosis of COPD based on medical chart review over the previous 12-months

107

46%

Good

Hvidsten et al. (2010) [24]

Norway

Cross-sectional

General Population, random sample

Post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.7

Spriometric obstruction and being treated by a physician or admitted to hospital for a diagnosis of obstructive lung disease (asthma, chronic bronchitis, emphysema, or COPD) in the previous 12-months (self-reported)

303

66%

Good

Labonté et al. (2016) [30]

Canada

Prospective cohort study

General Population, random sample

Post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.7

Spirometric obstruction and no previous diagnosis of chronic bronchitis, emphysema, or COPD (self-reported)

505

70%

Fair

Lamprecht et al. (2015) [4]

Global

Cross-sectional (BOLDb, PLATINOc, EPI-SCAN, PREPOCOLd)

General Population, random sample

Post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < LLN

Spirometric obstruction and no previous diagnosis of chronic bronchitis, emphysema, or COPD (self-reported)

2992

81%

Good

Llordes et al. (2015) [31]

Spain

Cross-sectional

Primary care clinic, all eligible patients were invited

Post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.7 in 2 tests 4 weeks apart (the 2nd after 4 weeks of pharmacological treatment)

Spirometric obstruction and no previous diagnosis of COPD in medical reports

422

57%

Fair

Mahishale et al. (2015) [32]

NR

Cross-sectional

Hospitalized patients, convenience sample

Post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.7

Spirometric obstruction and no previous diagnosis of COPD (self-reported)

404

56%

Poor

Miravitlles et al. (2009) [22]

Spain

Cross-sectional (EPI-SCAN)

General Population, random sample

Post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.7

Spirometric obstruction and no previous diagnosis of chronic bronchitis, emphysema, or COPD (self-reported)

408

73%

Good

Moreira et al. (2013) [16]

Brazil

Cross-sectional (PLATINO)

General Population, random sample

Post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.7

Spirometric obstruction and no previous diagnosis of chronic bronchitis, emphysema, or COPD (self-reported)

53

62%

Fair

Nascimento et al. (2007) [17]

Brazil

Cross-sectional (PLATINO)

General Population, random sample

Post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.7

Spirometric obstruction and no previous diagnosis of chronic bronchitis, emphysema, or COPD (self-reported)

144

88%

Fair

Queiroz et al. (2012) [27]

Brazil

Cross-sectional

Primary care clinics, convenience sample

Post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.7

Spirometric obstruction and no previous diagnosis of chronic bronchitis, emphysema, or COPD (self-reported)

63

71%

Good

Schirnhofer et al. (2011) [23]

Austria

Cross-sectional (BOLD)

General Population, random sample

Post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < LLN

Spirometric obstruction and no previous diagnosis of chronic bronchitis, emphysema, or COPD (self-reported)

199

86%

Good

Talamo et al. (2007) [18]

Brazil, Chile, Mexico, Uruguay, Venezuela

Cross-sectional (PLATINO

General Population, random sample

Post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.7

Spirometric obstruction and no previous diagnosis of chronic bronchitis, emphysema, or COPD (self-reported)

758

89%

Good

Zhang et al. (2013) [33]

China

Cross-sectional

Hospitalized patients, all eligible patients were invited

Post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.7

Spirometric obstruction and COPD not recorded as a discharge diagnosis in medical records

705

93%

Fair

  1. NR Not Reported
  2. aEpidemiologic Study of COPD in Spain (EPI-SCAN)
  3. bBurden of Obstructive Lung Disease (BOLD)
  4. cLatin American Project for the Investigation of Obstructive Lung Disease (PLATINO)
  5. dPrevalence study of COPD in Colombia (PREPOCOL)