Skip to main content

Table 3 Diagnostic test performance of GOLD and LLN with the expert panel as the reference test

From: "GOLD or lower limit of normal definition? a comparison with expert-based diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a prospective cohort-study"

 

GOLD

LLN: Enright [16]

LLN: Quanjer [14]

LLN: Falaschetti [17]

COPD prevalence (N)

244 (60%)

142 (35%)

167 (41%)

175(43%)

False positives (N)

33

6

9

9

False negatives (N)

36

111

89

81

Sensitivity

85.4%

55.1%

64.0%

67.2%

Specificity

79.1%

96.2%

94.3%

94.3%

Positive predictive value

86.5%

95.8%

94.6%

94.9%

Negative predictive value

77.6%

57.8%

62.6%

64.8%

Kappa coefficient

0.64 (0.56; 0.71)

0.46 (0.38; 0.53)

0.53 (0.46; 0.60)

0.57 (0.50; 0.64)

P

 

< 0.001

0.006

0.053

  1. COPD prevalence as % or N within the total cohort (N = 405) according to different definitions. P for comparison of κ coefficients of GOLD vs LLN.