Efficacy of a Carrageenan nasal spray in patients with common cold: a randomized controlled trial
© Ludwig et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 1 August 2013
Accepted: 10 November 2013
Published: 13 November 2013
The common cold is the most widespread viral infection in humans. Iota-carrageenan has previously shown antiviral effectiveness against cold viruses in clinical trials. This study investigated the efficacy of a carrageenan-containing nasal spray on the duration of the common cold and nasal fluid viral load in adult patients.
In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 211 patients suffering from early symptoms of the common cold were treated for seven days. Application was performed three times daily with either a carrageenan-supplemented nasal spray or saline solution as placebo with an overall observation period of 21 days. The primary endpoint was the duration of disease defined as the time until the last day with symptoms followed by all other days in the study period without symptoms. During the study, but prior unblinding, the definition of disease duration was adapted from the original protocol that defines disease duration as the time period of symptoms followed by 48 hours without symptoms.
In patients showing a laboratory-confirmed cold virus infection and adherence to the protocol, alleviation of symptoms was 2.1 days faster in the carrageenan group in comparison to placebo (p = 0.037). The primary endpoint that had been prespecified but was changed before unblinding was not met. Viral titers in nasal fluids showed a significantly greater decrease in carrageenan patients in the intention-to-treat population (p = 0.024) and in the per protocol population (p = 0.018) between days 1 and 3/4.
In adults with common cold virus infections, direct local administration of carrageenan with nasal sprays reduced the duration of cold symptoms. A significant reduction of viral load in the nasal wash fluids of patients confirmed similar findings from earlier trials in children and adults.
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN80148028
KeywordsCommon cold Virus Respiratory Disease Carrageenan
Acute viral respiratory tract infection (ARTI), also known as the common cold, is the most prevalent disease in humans. In the USA alone, non-influenza colds annually account for more than 20 million doctor visits and 40 million lost school and work days. With a total economic impact of approximately $40 billion, ARTI is among the ten most expensive illnesses in society .
In the majority of cases, common colds are caused by respiratory viruses such as rhinovirus, coronavirus, parainfluenza, influenza, respiratory syncytial virus, adenovirus, enterovirus, or metapneumovirus [2–7].
The number of etiological agents and antigenic variability has limited the possibility of creating an effective vaccine against the common cold. Numerous attempts to find effective prophylactic or therapeutic treatments including pharmaceutical  and herbal [9, 10] products, vitamins [11–14], zinc  and others have provided controversial results and are not considered effective when systematically reviewed [16–21].
Presently, therapy for the common cold mainly includes general care and treatment of symptoms. While these measures reduce symptoms, therapeutic interventions to date have not been proven to be effective in reducing viral load or the duration or severity of common colds .
The concept of using sulphated polysaccharides as antiviral agents was introduced more than 25 years ago . Due to the high molecular weight of polymers, parenteral administration is not feasible. For the treatment of sexually transmitted diseases, research has focused on topical microbicide development although not enough evidence has accumulated to recommend these agents at present. However, these polysaccharides have been tested to prevent sexually transmitted viral infections as a component of spermicides [24, 25].
Recently it was shown that iota-carrageenan, a sulphated polysaccharide found in some species of red seaweed, is a potent antiviral agent against respiratory viruses in cell culture and animal models [26, 27]. Laboratory data show that the carrageenan-polymer binds directly to the virus but not to cells trapping the particle and preventing cell attachment. Thus, carrageenan interferes with the virus life cycle at a very early stage due to a physical mechanism of action. Studies in vitro and in vivo have shown the effectiveness of carrageenan against several viruses such as hRV , influenza A  and RSV. Tests in vitro have shown that carrageenan does not penetrate the mucosa. Therefore, pharmacological, immunological or metabolic activities of carrageenan are not to be expected.
In addition to preclinical studies, symptomatic benefit and antiviral efficacy of a nasal spray containing carrageenan has been shown in two randomized clinical trials in adult  and pediatric patients with the common cold . This study was designed to investigate the efficacy of a carrageenan-containing nasal spray on the duration of the common cold and the viral load in nasal fluid in adult patients.
All patients were recruited at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology of the Vienna General Hospital, Austria between January, 2010 and April, 2011. Eligible patients were adults (18 years and older) with early symptoms of the common cold (onset less than 48 hours before inclusion) of mild to moderate intensity (Total Symptoms Score [TSS], of 2 to 9).
The intensity of common cold symptoms was assessed according to a published scoring system . Patients scored eight main symptoms (headache, muscle ache, chilliness, sore throat, blocked nose, runny nose, coughing and sneezing) using a four point scale as follows: 0 (symptom absent) and 1, 2 and 3 representing mild, moderate and severe intensity, respectively. TSS was calculated by investigators as the sum of individual scores.
Main exclusion criteria were known hypersensitivity or allergy to any component of the test product, concomitant disease or infection that could interfere with participation in the study, other reasons for nasal obstruction and other past or present conditions and treatments that could influence symptom scores. Specifically, during the treatment period (days 1–7), use of any other nasal spray, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antihistamines, decongestants, corticosteroids, antivirals, antitussives, herbal combinations for common colds and supplements containing ≥10 mg zinc or ≥100 mg vitamin C were prohibited.
The study was performed in compliance with the ICH E6 Note for Guidance on Good Clinical Practices (CPMP/ ICH/ 135/ 95/ 5) and the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The Ethics Committee of the participating site approved the protocol and all amendments. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant before enrolment into the study. Participants were compensated for expenses associated with participation.
This was a single-center, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, randomized (1:1) clinical trial to show differences between carrageenan-containing nasal spray over placebo in adult patients with early symptoms of the common cold.
The objective of this trial was to obtain information on the efficacy of carrageenan-containing nasal spray (Coldamaris prophylactic) in adult patients with early symptoms of the common cold. The aim was to show at least 2 days reduction in the duration of disease with a standard deviation (SD) of 4.9. This resulted in a sample size of 96 per group. With a maximal drop-out rate expected of 25%, the sample size was set at 125 patients per group. Type-I error probability was set to a two-sided alpha of 0.05. Power was set to 80 percent.
All patients were randomly assigned to receive either Coldamaris prophylactic nasal spray containing carrageenan (0.12%) or saline solution (sodium chloride 9.0 g/l) nasal spray, which served as a placebo. Nasal spray was administered three times daily into each nostril for 7 days. Coldamaris prophylactic nasal spray is a registered medical device marketed in Austria and manufactured by MoNo chem GmbH, Austria.
Each subject was randomised to one of the two groups according to a randomization schedule using random permuted blocks (block size of 4). The randomization list was prepared by a third party and was unblinded after trial review and data base lock.
Each nasal spray had a three-digit code. The sprays were assigned by investigators consecutively starting with the lowest treatment number available. Both investigators and patients were blinded to study treatment. Carrageenan and placebo nasal sprays were identical in shape, size and colour. Both spray solutions were clear, colourless, odourless and free of particulates.
For all enrolled subjects, medical histories were evaluated at baseline. Clinical assessments including ear, nose and throat examination were performed and nasal wash fluid for laboratory testing (viral assessment) was obtained. ENT examinations and nasal wash fluid collection were repeated on days 3/4 (visit 2) and 10/11 (visit 3). During visits, safety evaluation was also conducted. On the last visit (days 22–28), in addition to final safety assessments, all subjects were questioned regarding their opinion as to the acceptability of the study treatment.
During days 1 to 9, patients had to record whether they used the nasal spray as instructed, the presence of any additional symptoms, the use of any additional treatments and scores for the 8 main common cold symptoms described above. This diary had to be returned to the study site at visit 3.
From days 10 to 21, patients kept diaries on a daily basis and recorded common cold symptoms experienced and the product and dosage of any other treatments taken.
Compliance with study treatment was assessed by measuring the weight of the dispensed nasal spray on the days of issuance and return. A difference of less than 4.0 g was assessed as consumption less than 80% of study protocol and such patients were subsequently excluded from PP analysis.
Viral status assessment
Nasal wash fluid samples were obtained for virological analysis at baseline (day 1), at visit 2 (study days 3/4) and visit 3 (study days 10/11) using the following procedure. Approximately 2.5 ml of 0.9% saline solution were instilled into each nostril and kept in the nose for 10–30 seconds. Patients were then required to lean the head forward allowing saline to drip out of the nose into a collection cup. After collection, mucus was removed and the sample divided into 3 cryovials, labelled and stored at −80°C until assessment. The presence and the amount of viral RNA in nasal wash fluid samples was identified using a real-time, quantitative RT-PCR assay as described previously . Analyses for the respiratory viruses rhinovirus, coronavirus type OC43, coronavirus type 229E, influenza virus type A and B, human metapneumovirus, respiratory syncytial virus and parainfluenza types 1, 2 and 3 were performed.
A patient was considered to be virus-positive when at least one nasal wash fluid sample was tested positive for one virus.
The primary efficacy variable was the duration of disease defined as the time until the last day with symptoms followed by all other days in the study period without symptoms.
The main secondary efficacy variables were the presence of cold viruses in nasal fluid samples, severity of common cold symptoms on separate study days, number of days without symptoms during the observation period, use of co-medication additional to the study treatment between days 8–21 (after finishing treatment with the carrageenan nasal spray) and the number of cleared or newly acquired viral infections during the observation period.
The primary end point was analysed using the log rank test and the Mantel-Haenzel test. All data sets were checked for normal distribution by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov-Test prior to analysis. Binary or categorical data (e.g. presence or absence of viruses, number of patients with adverse events [AE]) were analysed by the Chi-square test.
Viral titer in nasal wash fluids as well as changes in titers between visits were analysed using the median test due to high variability. In the dataset for this analysis, all viruses detected were included and each virus was accounted for individually. Since some patients had more than one virus, the number of viral events was higher than the number of infected patients.
Experience from previous trials suggested that TSS data might not be normally distributed and lopsided. This was confirmed for the actual study with a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and a test for lopsided distribution of data. Hence analysis of TSS with standard conventional methods was not applicable. Prior to unblinding, it was decided to apply the analysis of ReWuMoD (regression with unknown model domain, Additional file 1: Figure S1) technique instead of conventional statistical methods. The principles of this technique have been described in detail previously . Briefly, this model transformed 10 TSS values (baseline and days 1–9) into a two line regression model for each individual patient. The average parameters of these two lines allowed the comparison of the course of the disease between the treatment groups irrespective of absolute TSS values.
ReWuMoD analysis yields a reduction from ten individual data points (TSS values) to five relevant parameters. Intercept and slope of the first straight line (with the parameters a1 and b1; representing the course of the early phase of the disease), the estimated/calculated break point (BP) between the two lines (representing the time point of the change in the course of the disease) and the parameters of the second line (abbreviated as a2 and b2; representing the course of the later phase of the disease).
It was further reasoned that the ReWuMoD model is less sensitive to absolute score values allowing the evaluation of different courses of disease independent of absolute values.
All findings after the screening visit were documented as AEs except for any symptoms attributed to common cold (sneezing, runny nose, nasal obstruction, sore throat, cough, headache, fatigue and chilliness) as defined in the protocol. Nevertheless, if such symptoms were of marked intensity or deemed to be not related to the study disease, these were recorded as AEs.
Altogether, 211 patients with suspected common cold were randomized with 203 completing treatment in the ITT population. Reasons for patient exclusion were lost to follow-up (5 patients) and exclusion according to protocol (3 patients). None of the patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events (Figure 1).
The PP population consisted of 178 patients. Main reasons for exclusion were the use of prohibited medications (n = 14) and non-compliance (n = 10). Additionally, one patient was enrolled with violation of inclusion/exclusion criteria (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as concomitant disease).
The virus positive populations consisted of 118 patients in the ITT-VP and 103 patients in PP-VP groups (Figure 1).
The ITT population comprised 110 females (59 placebo and 51 carrageenan) and 93 males (42 placebo and 51 carrageenan). The mean age was 33.3 years in the placebo and 33.7 years in the carrageenan group.
Demographic and baseline characteristics, ITT and ITT-VP population
Active OR passive smoker
Number of virus-positive patients and virus distribution between treatment groups*
n VP patients*
Primary endpoint: duration of disease
The relative risk for iota-carrageenan treated PP-VP patients to reduce the symptoms for 1 day was 1.24 (95% CI; 0.88-1.73). The absolute risk reduction (ARR) was −0.13 (95% CI; -0.32-0.08) and the number needed to treat (NNT) was 7.8 (95% CI; 3.1-infinite).
A similar trend was observed in the ITT-VP population, however, the difference was not statistically significant (log-rank test, p = 0.077, Figure 2A). The applied log rank test is more sensitive when the ratio of hazards is higher at early survival times, which is clearly not the case in this study. Further analysis with the Mantel-Haenszel test revealed slightly different p-values but did not change the overall result (ITT-VP: p = 0.051, PP-VP p = 0.020). The relative risk for iota-carrageenan treated ITT-VP patients to reduce the symptoms for 1 day was 1.09 (95% CI; 0.79-1.49). The ARR was −0.051 (95% CI; -0.24-0.14) and the number needed to treat NNT was 19.6 (95% CI; 4.1-infinite).
In the ITT population (N = 203) no statistical significance for the duration of disease was observed.
A posthoc analysis of symptom data revealed that in the ITT-VP population, 39 patients (33%) had re-appearing symptoms (25 placebo patients and 14 carrageenan patients). This difference between the groups was significant with a p-value of 0.031.
Use of additional treatments
Overall, the number of patients taking medications for common cold symptoms was low (less than 17% in total) with 15 patients in the carrageenan group and 19 patients in the placebo group taking additional medications (ITT) during the study period. In the PP population, 6 patients in the carrageenan group compared to 14 patients in the placebo group consumed additional medication. The difference between the groups represents a trend but was not statistically significant (p = 0.065).
Viral load in nasal fluid
Overall, the study treatment was well tolerated and no statistically significant differences were found between the study groups regarding the total number or distribution of AEs. In total, 43 AEs (related or not related) were reported, involving 38 subjects (19 subjects in each treatment group) in the trial. There was no significant difference in the frequency of AEs between treatment groups, with the majority of AEs observed only once or twice per SOC (System Organ Class) category (corresponding to a frequency of 0.94% - 1.92%).
Only one AE in the placebo group (the feeling of burning in the nose) was considered to be related to study treatment by the investigator. The vast majority of AEs (41 of 43) were of mild intensity. One AE in the carrageenan group (cycling accident with cerebral commotion and subarachnoidal hemorrhage) was of moderate intensity and one AE in the placebo group (gastric hypermotility) was rated as severe.
In this study, 3 severe AEs in 2 patients (not related and resolved by the end of the study) were reported in the carrageenan group. None of the patients discontinued treatment or participation in the trial due to an AE.
This double blind placebo controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness of a carrageenan nasal spray for the treatment of adult patients with common cold symptoms. This study confirms the results of earlier studies in adults and children. For patients compliant to the protocol and positive for a cold virus infection, a reduction of disease duration of 2.1 days was observed. The results therefore confirm that the local antiviral effectiveness of carrageenan leads to a significant clinical benefit. A pronounced trend was also observed in the ITT-VP population although differences did not reach the level of statistical significance. The main difference between the ITT-VP and PP-VP populations is the use of concomitant medication during the study. Patients were excluded from the PP analysis due to insufficient use of study medication when a reduction of dosage of more than 20% corresponding to 1.5 days of treatment was documented. Thus it can be concluded that tested dosage of 3 times per day is necessary and fewer applications may lead to a reduced clinical benefit.
As mentioned in the materials and methods section the primary endpoint was changed during the course of the study, prior unblinding and with approval of the ethics committee based on results of an earlier study in children. Analysis of the duration of disease according to the endpoint “time period between first and last day with symptoms followed by 48 hours without symptoms” did not result in significant difference in any analysed population neither in the adults or children. Hence, it can be concluded that a part of the positive effect of iota-carrageenan treatment is based on the ability to prevent the reappearance of symptoms when there is a symptom free period longer than 48 hours.
The results reported are limited to patients tested positive with real-time PCR, which is 58% of the study population. Analysis of the primary endpoint for the complete study population (ITT, N = 203) did not reveal a significant difference between the iota-carrageenan and the placebo group. However, analysis of TSS using ReWuMoD revealed a significant faster reduction of symptoms in the second phase of the disease. Similar to the ITT-VP group the reduction of symptoms in the iota-carrageenan group was approximately doubled when compared with the placebo group. This result indicates that independent of the actual cause of symptoms, iota-carrageenan treatment results in a faster reduction of symptom severity.
Due to the physical mechanism of action of carrageenan, it is unlikely that patients with cold symptoms not caused by a virus would have an added benefit in comparison to placebo treatment with a saline nasal solution. Treatment of common colds with saline nasal irrigation has been discussed to have a clinical benefit and has been described to be associated with less time off work . Consequently, the current study is limited by the fact that the placebo nasal spray containing a saline nasal solution most likely has caused a clinical benefit as well. This could explain why no significant effect on the primary endpoint in the ITT population was observed in this trial in contrast to the virus positive population that comprised 58% virus positive patients.
A recent study in children with a similar design revealed a significant reduction of time to disease clearance of 1.8 days in the ITT population comparable to this study . In that children trial around 90% of the children were tested virus-positive and hence there was negligible difference between the ITT and the ITT-VP population, although also in this study the ITT-VP population experienced a stronger effect of treatment with carrageenan. It can be assumed that both, adults and children infected with common cold viruses will benefit from local application of carrageenan in a similar way. In adults, the effect on disease duration might be masked by patients with cold symptoms not caused by viral infections. However, the faster rate of symptom reduction in all iota-carrageenan treated adults suggests that all patients with cold symptoms will have an added benefit when compared with a standard saline nasal spray that served as a placebo in the trial.
Analysis of TSS showed faster symptom improvement in carrageenan treated patients during the second phase of disease with statistically significant differences in the ITT-VP and PP-VP groups. In addition, the break point (representing changes in course of disease and start of recovery) was earlier in the ITT-VP and PP-VP in carrageenan patients. The applied ReWuMod method allows the evaluation of different courses of disease independent of absolute values. This was of particular interest as absolute values depend on different pathogens and subjective patient assessment. No significant difference in TSS between carrageenan and placebo groups was observed in the first 3 days of the study. However, carrageenan treated patients experienced a significantly earlier improvement in disease symptoms. Furthermore, the rate of symptom reduction per day was approximately doubled. It can therefore be concluded that the significant reduction in time to disease clearance was achieved by a faster decrease of symptoms visible on day 4 after inclusion.
The results are in line with data from a trial conducted in adults that showed a significant benefit on TSS in a relatively small group of patients . The trial conducted by Eccles et al. showed that within the first two days after inclusion, patients did not report an improvement in symptom scores. However, starting on day 3, carrageenan treated patients reported a greater reduction in TSS than placebo patients, resulting in a significant clinical benefit and a significant reduction in TSS on day 3. The clinical relevance of this finding is supported by the fact that symptom scores on day 3 of carrageenan treated patients were at the same levels as placebo treated patients on day 5, indicating a reduction in time to symptom alleviation of 2 days. This compares well with the 2.1 day reduction obtained in this trial.
Similar to all studies with the natural common cold, this trial is limited by an uncertainty over the actual dates and times of disease onset. There is a potential for inclusion of patients at later stages of disease which could be a source of bias diminishing treatment efficacy in natural settings. Comparing results from studies of natural and experimental colds suggested that a substantial proportion of patients with natural colds suffered from symptoms up to 1 day longer than they reported . Furthermore, in one study analysis of patient records revealed that up to 35% of patients with a natural cold, who reported being sick for up to 48 hours (inclusion criteria), were in fact ill for 3 days and more . As in any antimicrobial or antiviral intervention, an early start of treatment with carrageenan is likely to provide the best benefit for patients.
The rate of exposure of cigarette smoke in this trial was high (Table 1) Emerging evidence suggests that cigarette smoke affects viral and bacterial binding to epithelial cells [35, 36]. A post hoc analysis was conducted to reveal whether iota-carrageenan treatment is beneficial for patients exposed to cigarette smoke. Iota-carrageenan treated patients in the ITT-VP smoke exposed population (includes smokers and smoking exposed) showed an estimated duration of disease of 10.0 days (95% confidence interval [CI]; 8.1-12.0 days) in the carrageenan group compared to 13.6 days (95% CI; 10.9-16.3 days) in the placebo group (log-rank test, p = 0.031). When compared with the general population it is interesting that smoke exposed iota-carrageenan treated patients had a shorter duration of disease while there was no difference in the placebo group. The trial was neither designed nor powered to demonstrate the effect in this particular subgroup. Hence this encouraging results need to be viewed with caution.
A secondary objective of the study was the determination of viral pathogens and intranasal viral loads. Analysis of nasal fluid samples yielded seven different respiratory viruses (Table 2). As expected in common cold patients, more than 80% of virus positive patients suffered from a rhinovirus or corona virus infection. Viral titers in both carrageenan and placebo treated groups decreased from baseline to the second visit on day 3/4. This result is expected in the natural course of the common cold. However, the magnitude of reduction was greater in patients receiving the carrageenan nasal spray and was statistically significant in the ITT and the PP population. The data correspond to results from two earlier clinical trials in adults and children that both revealed a significant reduction of viral load in the nasal secretion of carrageenan patients [28, 29].
In this trial intranasal treatment with the carrageenan nasal spray was safe. No drug related serious adverse events were detected. This is most likely attributed to the physical mechanism of action and the fact that carrageenan is not capable of cell invasion. Due to the presumably very low rate of serious adverse events the study was insufficiently powered to detect them.
The use of carrageenan nasal spray was associated with a significant reduction of viral load in nasal fluids. Common cold patients with laboratory confirmed cold virus and compliant with study treatment showed shorter duration of disease and faster reduction of common cold symptoms when treated with carrageenan. Furthermore, the use of carrageenan nasal spray was safe and well tolerated. Appropriate dosage seems to be essential and early intervention is suggested to result in significant clinical effectiveness. Therefore, iota-carrageenan may be a good alternative treatment for viral infections of the upper respiratory tract known as the common cold.
This work was supported in part by a grant issued to Marinomed Biotechnologie GmbH by Austrian Science Promotion Agency (FFG).
- Fendrick AM, Monto AS, Nightengale B, Sarnes M: The economic burden of non-influenza-related viral respiratory tract infection in the United States. Arch Intern Med. 2003, 163: 487-494. 10.1001/archinte.163.4.487.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bertino JS: Cost burden of viral respiratory infections: issues for formulary decision makers. Am J Med. 2002, 112 (Suppl 6A): 42S-49S.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fox JP, Hall CE, Cooney MK, Luce RE, Kronmal RA: The seattle virus watch. II. Objectives, study population and its observation, data processing and summary of illnesses. Am J Epidemiol. 1972, 96: 270-285.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Monto AS, Ullman BM: Acute respiratory illness in an American community. The tecumseh study. JAMA. 1974, 227: 164-169. 10.1001/jama.1974.03230150016004.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gwaltney JMJ, Hendley JO, Simon G, Jordan WS: Rhinovirus infections in an industrial population. I. The occurrence of illness. N Engl J Med. 1966, 275: 1261-1268. 10.1056/NEJM196612082752301.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Makela MJ, Puhakka T, Ruuskanen O, Leinonen M, Saikku P, Kimpimaki M, Blomqvist S, Hyypia T, Arstila P: Viruses and bacteria in the etiology of the common cold. J Clin Microbiol. 1998, 36: 539-542.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Fendrick AM: Viral respiratory infections due to rhinoviruses: current knowledge, new developments. Am J Ther. 2003, 10: 193-202. 10.1097/00045391-200305000-00006.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Snell NJ: New treatments for viral respiratory tract infections–opportunities and problems. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2001, 47: 251-259. 10.1093/jac/47.3.251.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barrett B, Brown R, Rakel D, Mundt M, Bone K, Barlow S, Ewers T: Echinacea for treating the common cold: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2010, 153: 769-777. 10.7326/0003-4819-153-12-201012210-00003.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Josling P: Preventing the common cold with a garlic supplement: a double-blind, placebo-controlled survey. Adv Ther. 2001, 18: 189-193. 10.1007/BF02850113.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Karlowski TR, Chalmers TC, Frenkel LD, Kapikian AZ, Lewis TL, Lynch JM: Ascorbic acid for the common cold. A prophylactic and therapeutic trial. JAMA. 1975, 231: 1038-1042. 10.1001/jama.1975.03240220018013.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sasazuki S, Sasaki S, Tsubono Y, Okubo S, Hayashi M, Tsugane S: Effect of vitamin C on common cold: randomized controlled trial. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2006, 60: 9-17. 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602261.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Meydani SN, Leka LS, Fine BC, Dallal GE, Keusch GT, Singh MF, Hamer DH: Vitamin E and respiratory tract infections in elderly nursing home residents: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004, 292: 828-836. 10.1001/jama.292.7.828.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Graat JM, Schouten EG, Kok FJ: Effect of daily vitamin E and multivitamin-mineral supplementation on acute respiratory tract infections in elderly persons: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002, 288: 715-721. 10.1001/jama.288.6.715.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Prasad AS, Beck FW, Bao B, Snell D, Fitzgerald JT: Duration and severity of symptoms and levels of plasma interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor, and adhesion molecules in patients with common cold treated with zinc acetate. J Infect Dis. 2008, 197: 795-802. 10.1086/528803.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Douglas RM, Hemila H, Chalker E, Treacy B: Vitamin C for preventing and treating the common cold. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007, doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000980.pub3Google Scholar
- Linde K, Barrett B, Wolkart K, Bauer R, Melchart D: Echinacea for preventing and treating the common cold. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006, doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000530.pub2Google Scholar
- Lissiman E, Bhasale AL, Cohen M: Garlic for the common cold. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012, doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006206.pub3Google Scholar
- Wu T, Zhang J, Qiu Y, Xie L, Liu GJ: Chinese medicinal herbs for the common cold. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007, doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004782.pub2Google Scholar
- Hemila H, Virtamo J, Albanes D, Kaprio J: The effect of vitamin E on common cold incidence is modified by age, smoking and residential neighborhood. J Am Coll Nutr. 2006, 25: 332-339. 10.1080/07315724.2006.10719543.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- De Sutter AI, Van Driel ML, Kumar AA, Lesslar O, Skrt A: Oral antihistamine-decongestant-analgesic combinations for the common cold. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012, doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004976.pub3Google Scholar
- Kim SY, Chang YJ, Cho HM, Hwang YW, Moon YS: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the common cold. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009, doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006362.pub2Google Scholar
- Gonzalez ME, Alarcon B, Carrasco L: Polysaccharides as antiviral agents: antiviral activity of carrageenan. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987, 31: 1388-1393. 10.1128/AAC.31.9.1388.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Maguire RA, Zacharopoulos VR, Phillips DM: Carrageenan-based nonoxynol-9 spermicides for prevention of sexually transmitted infections. Sex Transm Dis. 1998, 25: 494-500. 10.1097/00007435-199810000-00010.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Obiero J, Mwethera PG, Wiysonge CS: Topical microbicides for prevention of sexually transmitted infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012, doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007961.pub2Google Scholar
- Leibbrandt A, Meier C, König-Schuster M, Weinmüllner R, Kalthoff D, Pflugfelder B, Graf P, Frank-Gehrke B, Beer M, Fazekas T, et al: Iota-carrageenan is a potent inhibitor of influenza A virus infection. PLoS One. 2010, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0014320Google Scholar
- Grassauer A, Weinmüllner R, Meier C, Pretsch A, Prieschl-Grassauer E, Unger H: Iota-Carrageenan is a potent inhibitor of rhinovirus infection. Virol J. 2008, doi:10.1186/1743-422X-5-107Google Scholar
- Eccles R, Meier C, Jawad M, Weinmüllner R, Grassauer A, Prieschl-Grassauer E: Efficacy and safety of an antiviral Iota-Carrageenan nasal spray: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled exploratory study in volunteers with early symptoms of the common cold. Respir Res. 2010, doi:10.1186/1465-9921-11-108Google Scholar
- Fazekas T, Eickhoff P, Pruckner N, Vollnhofer G, Fischmeister G, Diakos C, Rauch M, Verdianz M, Zoubek A, Gadner H, et al: Lessons learned from a double-blind randomised placebo-controlled study with a iota-carrageenan nasal spray as medical device in children with acute symptoms of common cold. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2012, doi:10.1186/1472-6882-12-147Google Scholar
- Jackson GG, Dowling HF, Spiesman IG, Boand AV: Transmission of the common cold to volunteers under controlled conditions. I. The common cold as a clinical entity. AMA Arch Intern Med. 1958, 101: 267-278. 10.1001/archinte.1958.00260140099015.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Neumann K: The signal strengthening power of statistics: a demonstration of regression with unknown model domain in statistics and pharmacoeconomics. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 1997, 6 (Suppl 3): S27-S29.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kassel JC, King D, Spurling GKP: Saline nasal irrigation for acute upper respiratory tract infections (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010, doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006821.pub2Google Scholar
- Gwaltney JMJ, Hendley JO, Patrie JT: Symptom severity patterns in experimental common colds and their usefulness in timing onset of illness in natural colds. Clin Infect Dis. 2003, 36: 714-723. 10.1086/367844.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gwaltney JMJ, Buier RM, Rogers JL: The influence of signal variation, bias, noise and effect size on statistical significance in treatment studies of the common cold. Antiviral Res. 1996, 29: 287-295. 10.1016/0166-3542(95)00935-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Claude JA, Grimm A, Savage HP, Pinkerton KE: Perinatal exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) enhances susceptibility to viral and secondary bacterial infections. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012, 9: 3954-3964. 10.3390/ijerph9113954.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Grigg J, Walters H, Sohal SS, Wood-Baker R, Reid DW, Xu CB, Edvinsson L, Morissette MC, Stampfli MR, Kirwan M, et al: Cigarette smoke and platelet-activating factor receptor dependent adhesion of Streptococcus pneumoniae to lower airway cells. Thorax. 2012, 67: 908-913. 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-200835.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.