From: Clinical use of exhaled volatile organic compounds in pulmonary diseases: a systematic review
Author (year) | Disease I | N | Discriminative | Disease II | N | No. of markers | Sensitivity/Specificity (%)* | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D’Amico (2010) | LC | 28 | + | Other lung diseases | 28 | N.S. | 93/79 | [44] |
Dragonieri (2007) | Mild asthma | 10 | +/− | Severe asthma | 10 | N.S. | CVV: 65% (M-distance 1.23) | [10] |
Fens (2009) | Asthma | 20 | + | COPD | 30 | N.S. | CVV: 96% (p < 0.001) | [15] |
Fens (2011) ** | Fixed Asthma | 21 | + | COPD | 40 | N.S. | 85/90 (CVV: 88%, p < 0.001) | [27] |
Classic Asthma | 39 | + | Â | Â | Â | 91/90 (CVV: 83%, p < 0.001) | Â | |
Ibrahim (2011) | Controlled Asthma | 17 | + | Uncontrolled asthma | 18 | 13 | 89/88 (PPV: 0.89, NPV: 0.88) | [20] |
Timms (2012) | Asthma | 20 | + | COPD | 17 | N.S. | CVV: 70% (p < 0.05) | [32] |
Asthma | 11 | + | Asthma with GER | 9 | Â | CVV: 85% (p < 0.05) | Â | |
COPD | 8 | +/- | COPD with GER | 9 | Â | CVV: 65 (p < 0.05) | Â | |
Hattesohl (2011) | COPD without AAT deficiency | 23 | +/- | COPD with AAT deficiency | 10 | N.S. | CVV: 58% (M-distance: 2.27) | [28] |
Dragonieri (2009) | LC | 10 | + | COPD | 10 | N.S. | CVV: 85% (M-distance: 3.73) | [12] |
Machado (2005) | LC (validation) | 14 | +/- | No LC | 62 | N.S. | 71/92 | [13] |
Mazzone (2007) | LC | 49 | +/− | No LC | 94 | N.S. | 73/72 | [50] |
Mazzone (2012) | NSCLC | 83 | + | No LC | 137 | N.S. | 70/86 | [51] |
Adenocarcinoma | 50 | + | No LC | 137 | Â | 80/86 | Â | |
Squamous cell | 23 | + | No LC | 137 | Â | 91/73 | Â | |
Adenocarcinoma | 50 | + | Squamous cell | 22 | Â | 90/83 | Â | |
Phillips (1999) | LC | 60 | +/− | No LC | 48 | 22 | 72/67 | [54] |
Phillips (2003) | MLC | 15 | - | No MLC | 91 | 9 | 67/37 | [7] |
Poli (2005) | NSCLC | 36 | + | No LC | 110 | 13 | 72/94 | [57] |
Chapman (2012) | MPM | 10 | + | ARD | 18 | N.S. | 90/83 | [68] |
Dragonieri (2012) | MPM | 13 | + | No MPM | 13 | N.S. | CVV: 81% (p < 0.001) | [69] |
Hanson (2005) | + VAP score | 19 | + | - VAP score | 19 | N.S. | R2 (to standard): 0.81 (p < 0.0001) | [72] |
Hockstein (2004) | VAP | 13 | + | No VAP | 12 | N.S. | CVV: >80% | [73] |
Hockstein (2005) | + VAP score | 15 | +/− | - VAP score | 29 | N.S. | CVV: 66-70% | [74] |
Kolk (2012) | TB | 50 | + | No TB | 50 | 7 | 72/86 | [76] |
TB (validation) | 21 | + | No TB | 50 | 7 | 62/84 | ||
Phillips (2007) | TB | 23 | + | No TB | 19 | N.S. (≈14) | 96/79 | [77] |
Phillips (2010) | TB | N.S. | + | No TB | N.S. | N.S. (≈10) | 84/65 | [78] |