Skip to main content

Table 3 Subgroup analysis to explore heterogeneity in the estimate of the pooled prevalence of pulmonary fibrosis

From: Pulmonary function and chest computed tomography abnormalities 6–12 months after recovery from COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

 

Studies (k)

Patients (n)

Pooled prevalence (95% CI)

I2 (%)

P value

Overall

18

2597

0.32 (0.23–0.40)

96.59

 

Follow-up interval after initial presentation (months)

0.290

 6

11

1254

0.36 (0.24–0.47)

95.10

 

 12

7

1343

0.26 (0.11–0.40)

97.74

 

Risk of bias of study

0.966

 Low-to-intermediate

9

1880

0.31 (0.18–0.44)

97.80

 

 Intermediate-to-high

9

717

0.32 (0.19–0.44)

94.05

 

Proportion of patients with severe COVID-19 (%)a

0.014

 ≥ 50

10

1804

0.36 (0.23–0.50)

73.90

 

 < 50

6

534

0.18 (0.12–0.24)

88.62

 

Pulmonary fibrosis definition

0.102

 Defined clearly in the original article

10

1540

0.38 (0.23–0.52)

97.63

 

 Estimated by the authors

8

1057

0.24 (0.15–0.33)

91.59

 
  1. COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019
  2. aSome studies included in the overall meta-analysis did not report data on the disease severity of patients and were therefore not included in the subgroup analysis