Skip to main content

Table 2 Subgroup analysis to explore heterogeneity in the estimate of the pooled prevalence of pulmonary function abnormalities

From: Pulmonary function and chest computed tomography abnormalities 6–12 months after recovery from COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

 

Studies (k)

Patients (n)

Pooled prevalence (95% CI)

I2 (%)

P value

Impaired diffusion capacity

19

2573

0.35 (0.30–0.41)

87.72

 

Follow-up interval after initial presentation (months)

0.115

 6

10

1450

0.39 (0.34–0.45)

74.42

 

 12

9

1123

0.31 (0.21–0.40)

91.70

 

Risk of bias of study

0.931

 Low-to-moderate

12

1803

0.35 (0.28–0.43)

91.31

 

 Moderate-to-high

7

770

0.36 (0.29–0.42)

69.20

 

Proportion of patients with severe COVID-19 (%)a

0.015

 ≥ 50

13

2105

0.39 (0.35–0.44)

73.90

 

 < 50

5

398

0.24 (0.12–0.35)

88.62

 

Reduced forced vital capacity

15

2679

0.08 (0.06–0.11)

85.51

 

Follow-up interval after initial presentation (months)

0.006

 6

7

1201

0.13 (0.08–0.19)

89.57

 

 12

8

1478

0.05 (0.03–0.07)

69.29

 

Risk of bias of study

0.033

 Low-to-moderate

10

2219

0.06 (0.04–0.08)

78.97

 

 Moderate-to-high

5

550

0.15 (0.07–0.24)

87.16

 

Proportion of patients with severe COVID-19 (%)a

0.544

 ≥ 50

10

2218

0.08 (0.05–0.10)

86.82

 

 < 50

3

288

0.06 (0.00–0.11)

75.23

 
  1. COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019
  2. aSome of the studies included in the overall meta-analysis did not report data on the disease severity of patients and were therefore not included in the subgroup analysis