Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of baseline characteristics between the sirolimus and the non-sirolimus groups among patients with LAM

From: Long-term clinical course and outcomes in patients with lymphangioleiomyomatosis

Characteristic

Sirolimus

Non-sirolimus

P-value

Number of patients

22

22

 

Age, years

42.4 ± 3.2

40.8 ± 9.2

0.723

Female sex

22 (100)

22 (100)

> 0.999

Ever-smoker

1 (4.5)

3 (13.6)

0.607

TSC

2 (9.1)

3 (13.6)

> 0.999

Pneumothorax

12 (54.5)

9 (40.9)

0.365

Chylothorax

0 (0.0)

2 (9.1)

0.488

Extrapulmonary manifestations

7 (31.8)

10 (45.5)

0.537

 Angiomyolipoma

7 (31.8)

7 (31.8)

> 0.999

 Lymphangioleiomyoma

1 (4.5)

2 (9.1)

> 0.999

Lung function, % predicted

 FEV1

75.0 ± 18.0

78.1 ± 20.1

0.655

 FVC

85.9 ± 12.9

87.1 ± 13.6

0.796

 DLCO

60.9 ± 18.0

62.2 ± 15.5

0.655

 TLC

97.5 ± 11.9

96.0 ± 12.5

0.879

 FEV1/FVC

87.5 ± 16.5

90.3 ± 20.0

0.348

 RV

98.6 ± 23.3

101.4 ± 22.3

0.702

 FEF25–75%

75.4 ± 42.8

76.7 ± 47.2

0.930

6MWT

 Distance, m

513.4 ± 79.6

508.0 ± 54.2

0.496

 Lowest SpO2, %

93.9 ± 4.0

95.7 ± 5.0

0.047

  1. Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation or as a number (%), unless otherwise indicated. The index date was set as the date of the first prescription of sirolimus in the sirolimus group and the date of LAM diagnosis in the non-sirolimus group
  2. DLCO diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, FEV1 forced expiratory volume in one second, FVC forced vital capacity, RV residual volume, FEF25–75% forced expiratory flow between 25 and 75% of FVC, LAM lymphangioleiomyomatosis, TSC tuberous sclerosis complex, TLC total lung capacity, SpO2 oxygen saturation, 6MWT 6-min walk test