Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of population-based studies estimating prevalence of small airways obstruction

From: Spirometry parameters used to define small airways obstruction in population-based studies: systematic review

Author, year

Study design

Population

Sample size

Age (years)

Sex

Spirometry Parameter(s) used to define SAO

Definition of abnormal result

Prevalence estimate(s) for SAO

Study quality (NOS)

Detels et al. 1979 [29]

Cross-sectional

Burbank and Lancaster, California, USA

White (94%); black (1%); Spanish-surnamed (4%);

other (1%)

N = 7974

18–65 + 

F = 4126 (51.7%)

FEF25–75

< 75% predicted

> 18 years only

Pre BD

21.4%#

Fair

Wipf et al. 1982 [35]

Cohort

Baseline and at 5 years follow-up

Geneva, Switzerland

Current, former and never smokers

N = 272

18–50 + 

F = 112, (41.2%)

FEF25–75/VC

FEF25–75/VC < FEV1/VC

Pre BD

Baseline: 32.3%

Fair

Marazzini et al. 1989 [32]

Cohort

Baseline and 6 years

Italy,

White-collar workers

Smokers and non-smokers

N = 85

Mean (SD):

41.25 (7.4)

M = 85 (100%)

FEF25-75, FEF25 and CC

One of: FEF25–75 < 60%, FEF25 < 65% CC > 130% predicted

FEV1 and VC > 80% predicted

Pre BD

Baseline: 45.9%#

Fair

Cullinan et al. 1997 [23]

Cross-sectional

Bhopal India

Site of Union Carbide gas leak

Never and ever smokers

Spirometry: N = 74

Total: N = 454

Mean (SD):

35.5 (3.2)

F = 44 (59.6%)

FEF25-75

 < Lowest quartile (< 67% predicted)

Pre BD

25.7%#

fair

Nemoto et al. 2011 [14]

Cross-sectional

Takahata Japan, participants of an annual health check

Never and ever smokers

N = 2917

40–90

F = 1592 (54.6%)

FEF50/FEF25

 > 4.0

Pre BD

36.5%

Fair

Lam et al. 2012 [40]

Cross-sectional

Hong Kong Chinese

Smokers only

N = 525

18–60 + 

M = 525 (100%)

FEV3/FVC

 < LLN

Pre BD

18.1%

Fair

Chen et al. 2013 [38]

Nested case–control, with prevalence of SAO estimated from larger cohort

Moss Green, Huangqi Peninsula, Fujian, China

Current former and never smokers

N = 2873

SAO:

N = 216

Median (IQR):

50.5 (42–59)

50.5 (42–58)

F = 121 (56%)

F = 240 (56%)

FEF50

 < 70% predicted

Pre BD

7.5%

Fair

Hansen et al. 2015 [12]

Cross-sectional

USA,

NHANES-3 data

Current smokers

N = 3508

20–79.9

F = 1571 (44.7%)

FEV3/FVC

FEV3/FEV6

< LLN

< LLN

Pre BD

16.3%

16.6%

Fair

Johns et al. 2017 [42]

Cross-sectional

Post BD only

BOLD study, Victoria and Tasmania, Australia

Never and ever smokers

N = 890

Mean (SD):

58.7 (10.8)

F = 466 (52.4%)

FEF25-75

Central concavity

Peripheral

FEV1/FVC > LLN

< LLN

> ULN

> ULN

Post BD

5.4%

7.5%

9.8%

Fair

Xiao et al. 2020 [13]

Cross-sectional

CPH study, mainland China

Covering all geographical regions

Current, former and never smokers

N = 50,479

Mean (SD)

49.3 (13.8)

F = 29,213 (57.9%)

FEF25–75, FEF50 and FEF75

FEF25–75

FEF50

FEV3/FVC

2/3 < 65% predicted

< LLN

< 70% predicted

< LLN

With:

FEV1 > 80% and FEV1/FVC > 0.7

Pre BD

28.5%

Post BD

13.3%

Pre BD: 26.9%

Pre BD: 36.5%

Pre BD: 13.9%

Good

  1. #Calculated from the information provided in a publication (cases/total population × 100). Prevalence estimates in bold indicate which estimates were used for meta-analysis. NOS: Newcastle–Ottawa scale, FEV1: forced expiratory volume in one second, FVC: forced vital capacity, FEF25–75: Mean expiratory flow rate between 25 and 75% of the FVC, FEF25–75/VC: Mean expiratory flow rate between 25 and 75% of the FVC as a ratio of the vital capacity. FEF25: Flow rate at 25% of FVC, CC: closing capacity, FEF50/FEF25: Forced expiratory flow at 50% of the FVC as a ratio or the forced expiratory flow with 25% of the FVC remaining, FEV3/FVC: forced expiratory volume in 3 s as a ratio of the FVC, FEV3/FEV6: forced expiratory volume in three seconds as a ratio of the forced expiratory volume in 6 s. FEF50: Forced expiratory flow at 50% of the FVC, SD: standard deviation, IQR: interquartile range. Pre BD: pre bronchodilator, Post BD: Post Bronchodilator (200 microg salbutamol), SAO: small airway obstruction, LLN: lower limit of normal, ULN: upper limit of normal