Skip to main content
Fig. 4 | Respiratory Research

Fig. 4

From: Mucus threads from surface goblet cells clear particles from the airways

Fig. 4

Mucus threads collected together and on mucus bundles. A Image sequence from a high-resolution video illustrating a UEA1-positive mucus assembly (green arrow) docking to an LTL-positive bundle (blue arrow) coated with UEA1 on a newborn WT piglet trachea (Additional file 5). B Image sequence from a high-resolution video illustrating a UEA1-positive mucus assembly (green arrow) docking to another UEA1-positive mucus assembly (dark green arrow) on a newborn WT piglet trachea (Additional file 6). C Bead-gathering mucus formations were divided into threads and mucus assemblies based on the maximum thread thickness of 2 µm determined by the difference in thickness between hydrated and fixed mucus. One thread was observed in WT and none in CF. WT: 15 values (9 pigs), CF: 6 values (3 pigs). D Thickness measurements of UEA1-stained mucus in high-resolution images from live explant tracheas from weaned pigs, newborn WT and CF piglets resulted in 3 threads and 48 mucus assemblies (6 weaned pigs), 3 threads and 54 mucus assemblies (10 newborn WT piglets), 2 threads and 37 mucus assemblies (12 newborn CF piglets), using the same criteria as in C. Mucus assemblies in weaned pigs were thicker than the corresponding assemblies in newborn CF piglets, P = 0.0418 * Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn´s multiple comparisons test. E Alcian blue stained mucus bundle velocity in weaned, newborn WT and CF tracheas measured in low-resolution time-lapses recorded on the tilted table. Each data point represents one pig. Weaned 19 pigs, newborn WT 14 pigs and newborn CF 12 pigs. Weaned bundles were faster than newborn WT bundles, P = 0.0111 *, Mann–Whitney test. F There was no difference in velocity between bead-collecting mucus assemblies in newborn WT and CF piglet trachea. WT: 15 values, 15 time-lapses, 8 pigs. CF: 12 values, 12 time-lapses, 6 pigs. Mann–Whitney test: P > 0.05. Data in (CF) presented as median with interquartile range

Back to article page