Drug | Age, years | na | Mean difference FEV1, % predicted (95% CI) active drug vs placebo |
---|---|---|---|
LABA added to ICS versus ICS, FEV1 response (Cochrane analysis: Chauhan 2015) | 534 | 2.99 (0.86, 5.11)b | |
Formoterol added to ICS versus ICS | |||
Akpinarli 1999 Formoterol 12 μg BID add-on to ICS 400–800 μg/day | 6–14 | 32 | 2.00 (−24.10, 28.10)b |
Salmeterol added to beclomethasone dipropionate versus beclomethasone dipropionate | |||
Verberne 1998 Salmeterol/beclomethasone dipropionate 50/200 μg BID vs beclomethasone dipropionate 200 μg BID | 6–16 | 117 | 3.08 (−0.49, 6.65)b |
Meijer 1995 Salmeterol 50 μg BID + beclomethasone dipropionate 250 μg BID | 7–15 | 39 | 3.60 (−2.94, 10.14)b |
Salmeterol added to fluticasone propionate versus fluticasone propionate | |||
Carroll 2010 Fluticasone/salmeterol 100/50 BID vs fluticasone 100 μg BID | 7–18 | 37 | 5.20 (−1.04, 11.44)b |
Lenney 2013 Fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 100/50 μg BID vs fluticasone propionate 100 μg BID | 6–14 | 21 | 15.42 (1.51, 29.33)b |
Teper 2005 Fluticasone/salmeterol 125/25 μg BID vs fluticasone 125 μg BID | 6–14 | 82 | −0.40 (−5.03, 4.23)b |
Salmeterol added to ICS versus ICS | |||
Russell 1995 Salmeterol 50 μg BID add-on to ICS 400–2400 μg/day | 4–16 | 206 | 3.40 (−1.54, 8.34)b |
Tiotropium in moderate asthma | |||
Tiotropium 5 μg Add-on to 400–800 μg/day budesonide (200–800 μg/day for patients aged 12–14 years) | 12–17 | 268 268 | Trough: 3.205 (0.209, 6.201) Peak: 4.492 (1.700, 7.285) |
Tiotropium 2.5 μg Add-on to 400–800 μg/day budesonide (200–800 μg/day for patients aged 12–14 years) | 12–17 | 256 257 | Trough: 2.850 (−0.229, 5.929) Peak: 4.066 (1.208, 6.924) |
Tiotropium 5 μg Add-on to 200–400 μg budesonide | 6–11 | 260 260 | Trough: 4.439 (1.207, 7.671) Peak: 6.521 (3.717, 9.325) |
Tiotropium 2.5 μg Add-on to 200–400 μg budesonide | 6–11 | 257 257 | Trough: 5.048 (1.811, 8.285) Peak: 7.698 (4.892, 10.505) |
Tiotropium in severe asthma | |||
Tiotropium 5 μg Add-on to high-dose ICSc + ≥1 controller or medium-dose ICSd + ≥2 controllers | 12–17 | 262 262 | Trough: 0.827 (−2.354, 4.008) Peak: 1.643 (−1.252, 4.539) |
Tiotropium 2.5 μg Add-on to high-dose ICSc + ≥1 controller or medium-dose ICSd + ≥2 controllers | 12–17 | 258 258 | Trough: 3.283 (0.075, 6.491) Peak: 3.106 (0.188, 6.024) |
Tiotropium 5 μg Add-on to > 400 μg budesonide + ≥1 controller or 200–400 μg budesonide + ≥2 controllers | 6–11 | 258 258 | Trough: 3.848 (0.576, 7.120) Peak: 6.325 (3.264, 9.385) |
Tiotropium 2.5 μg Add-on to > 400 μg budesonide + ≥1 controller or 200–400 μg budesonide + ≥2 controllers | 6–11 | 265 265 | Trough: 2.350 (−0.909, 5.609) Peak: 3.587 (0.540, 6.634) |
Montelukast | |||
Castro-Rodriguez 2010 Meta-analysis: Montelukast 5 mg QD Add-on to 200–800 μg/day budesonide | 5–18 | 188a | 0.09 (−0.07, 0.25)b |
Simons 2001 Montelukast 5 mg QD + budesonide 200 μg BID vs budesonide 200 μg BID | 6–14 | 279 | 1.3 (− 0.1, 2.7)b |
Miraglia del Giudice 2007 Montelukast 5 μg QD + budesonide 200 μg BID vs budesonide 200 μg BID | 7–11 | 48 | 10.8 (NR)b |
Zhao 2015 Network meta-analysis: Montelukast 4–10 mg QD add-on to 100–200 μg/day budesonide | ≤18 | NR | |
Stelmach 2007 Montelukast 5–10 μg QD + 200 μg budesonide BID vs 200 μg budesonide BID | 6–18 | 76 | 2.6 (NR)b |
Stelmach 2015 Montelukast 5 mg QD add-on to 200–600 μg budesonidee | 6–14 | 76 | 2.5 (NR)b,f |