Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies about the relation between vitamin d and lung function in asthma patients

From: Meta-analysis of vitamin D and lung function in patients with asthma

Author (year)

Country

Research

Partients

Ages

Measurement

VitaminD level (ng/ml)

rFEV1%

rFEV1

rFVC

FVC %

rFEV1/FVC

ACT

Searing,D.A2010 [22]

USA

cross-sectional

100

7 (4–10)

CLIA

median value:31

0.34

NG

NG

0.12

0.3

NG

Sutherland,E.R.2010 [23]

USA

cross-sectional

54

38.3 ± 11.2

LC-MS/MS

28.1 ± 10.2

NG

0.8

NG

NG

NG

NG

Alyasin, S.2011 [24]

Iran

cross-sectional

50

9.31 ± 2.67

RIA

49.29 ± 21.44

NG

0.564

NG

NG

0.561

NG

Chinellato, I.2011(a) [25]

Italy

cross-sectional

75

9.6 ± 1.7

CLIA

NG

0.16

NG

0.25

NG

−0.15

0.28

Chinellato, I.2011(b) [26]

Italy

cross-sectional

45

10 (9–11)

RIA

19.7 ± 5.778

NG

0.32

0.34

NG

NG

NG

Li,F2011 [27]

Chinese

cross-sectional

435

42.6 ± 1.6

ELISA

Median 30.53

0.12

NG

NG

NG

NG

NG

Gupta, A. 2012 [28]

UK

cross-sectional

86

11.7

HPLC

34.08 ± 19.8

NG

0.43

0.32

NG

NG

0.6

Korn,S.2013 [29]

Germany

cross-sectional

280

45.0 ± 13.8

RIA

25.6 ± 11.8

0.235

NG

NG

NG

NG

NG

Krobtrakulchai,W.2013 [30]

Thailand

cross-sectional

125

10.8 ± 3.0

ECLIA

27.8 ± 8.6

NG

0.09

−0.007

NG

0.124

NG

Montero-Arias, F.2013 [31]

USA

cross-sectional

121

48.1 ± 15.7

ELISA

NG

NG

0.173

NG

NG

NG

NG

Awasthi,S.2014 [32]

India

case–control

20

5–15 y

ELISA

20.84 ± 7.99

0.853

NG

NG

NG

NG

NG

Columbo, M.2014 [33]

USA

cross-sectional

28

72.6 ± 5.8

NG

24.3 ± 9.2

0.34

NG

NG

NG

0.11

NG

Dogru, M.2014 [34]

Turkey

case-control

120

4.4 ± 1.2 years

LC-MS

21.49 ± 7.74

NG

NG

NG

NG

NG

NG

Samrah, S.2014 [35]

Jordan

case–control

68

41 ± 13.7

HPLC

8.3 ± 3.2

NG

NG

NG

NG

NG

0.3

Aldubi, H. M.2015 [36]

Saudi

cross-sectional

45

9.2 ± 1.1

ECLIA

11.1 ± 5.75

NG

NG

NG

NG

NG

0.956

Tamasauskiene,L.2015 [37]

UK

case-control

85

46.41 ± 1.54

ELISA

14.36 ± 0.57

NG

−0.06

−0.01

NG

0.72

NG

Boonpiyathad,T.2016 [38]

Tailand

cross-sectional

47

63.48 ± 11.79

HPLC

23.84 ± 8.89

NG

NG

NG

NG

NG

0.3

Havan, M.2017 [39]

Turkey

cross-sectional

38

10.28 ± 2.70

CLIA

14.44 ± 6.203

NG

0.122

NG

NG

0.633

NG

Havan, M.2017 [39]

Turkey

cross-sectional

20

10.28 ± 2.70

CLIA

14.44 ± 6.203

NG

0.136

NG

NG

0.136

NG

Havan, M.2017 [39]

Turkey

cross-sectional

14

10.28 ± 2.70

CLIA

14.44 ± 6.203

NG

0.167

NG

NG

0.549

NG

Janeva-Jovanovska,E.2017 [40]

Macedonia

cross-sectional

30

NG

ELISA

15.260 ± 5.808

NG

−0.1005

NG

NG

NG

NG

Ozdogan, S. 2017 [41]

Turkey

cross-sectional

71

11.97 ± 1.93

LC-MS/MS

11.8 ± 10.3

− 0.184

−0.17

− 0.05

0.01

− 0.22

NG

Bai,Y.J2018 [42]

China

case-control

117

8.52 ± 2.37

CLIA

6.9 ± 1.77

0.79

NG

0.77

NG

0.7

NG

Batmaz,S.B.2018 [43]

Turkey

cohort

30

11.74 ± 2.4

HPLC

25.74 ± 9.06

0.483

NG

NG

NG

NG

0.498

Kang, Q.2018 [6]

China

case-control

96

6.56 ± 1.38

ELISA

18.89 ± 3.63

NG

−0.568

0.601

NG

0.345

NG

Reinehr, T.2018 [44]

Germany

cross-sectional

36

9.3 ± 1.7

CLIA

20.6 ± 9.1

0.001

NG

NG

NG

NG

NG

  1. NG Not given, RIA Radio-immunoassay, CLIA Chemiluminescent immunoassay, HPLC High-performance liquid chromatography, ECLIA Electroluminescence immunoassay, ELISA Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, LC-MS/MS Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry, USA United States, UK United Kingdom