Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparisons of lipid subclasses between CAP and controls

From: Inflammatory responses relate to distinct bronchoalveolar lavage lipidome in community-acquired pneumonia patients: a pilot study

Lipid Class Lipid Sub-Class Adduct % of the total lipid signals Fold change Kruskal-Wallis adjusted
p-value
SCAP/Control NSCAP/ Control SCAP/NSCAP
Acylcarnitines AcCa +H 0.06% 0.48 0.75 0.63 0.078
Fatty acids SFA -H 54.96% 0.93 0.99 0.94 0.14
MUFA -H 1.35% 2.13*** 1.13** 1.92 < 0.0005
PUFA -H 0.85% 2.50* 1.33* 1.92 0.004
Sphingolipids Cer +H 2.16% 1.09 1.41 0.81 0.95
CerG1 +H 0.32% 1.13 1.46 0.82 0.482
CerG2 +H 0.25% 16.36*** 13.51*** 1.64 < 0.0005
GM3 +H 0.01% 0.98 1.16 0.88 0.125
SM +H 7.91% 1.11 1.06 1.06 0.792
So +H 0.81% 0.44*** 0.65** 0.67 < 0.0005
Neutral lipids DG +NH4 1.88% 1.96* 1.96 0.94 0.031
TG +NH4 23.77% 0.92 0.91 1.00 0.222
Phospholipids PC +CH3COO 4.26% 1.36 1.01 1.36 0.81
PE -H 0.72% 2.14*** 1.43* 1.60 < 0.0005
PG -H 0.77% 0.67* 0.87 0.76 0.019
PI -H 0.45% 1.65 0.90 1.84 0.110
PS -H 0.09% 1.69 1.50 1.20 0.034
LPC +H 0.55% 0.47** 0.71 0.70 0.002
LPE +H 0.08% 0.49* 0.76 0.70 0.014
LPG -H 0.01% 0.41*** 0.72 0.58 < 0.0005
  1. The relative abundances of lipid subclasses were calculated from the sum of lipid species that classified to the same subclass. The * depicts a statistically significant difference. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001