Skip to main content

Table 1 Secondary Outcomes

From: High-flow nasal cannula in adults with acute respiratory failure and after extubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Clinical Outcome

No of Trials (number of patients)

Summary Estimate of Effect (Risk Ratio/Mean Difference with 95% CI)

P-value

I2 (%)

Trials Comparing HFNC vs. COT as an Initial Support Strategy

 ICU mortality

1(200)a

–

–

–

 Hospital mortality

2(503)

0.72(0.42–1.25)

0.25

59%

 ICU length of stay

–

–

–

–

 Hospital length of stay

–

–

–

–

 ED length of stay

3(531)b

–

–

–

Trials Comparing HFNC vs. COT After Extubation

 ICU mortality

3(787)

0.99(0.47–2.08)

0.97

0%

 Hospital mortality

2(683)

0.87(0.47–1.58)

0.64

0%

 ICU length of stay

4(710)

3.06(−0.56–6.69)

0.10

0%

 Hospital length of stay

1(59)a

–

–

–

 ED length of stay

–

–

–

–

Trials Comparing HFNC vs. NIV as an Initial Support Strategy

 ICU mortality

1(216)a

–

–

–

 Hospital mortality

–

–

–

–

 ICU length of stay

–

–

–

–

 Hospital length of stay

–

–

–

–

 ED length of stay

1(204)a

–

–

–

Trials Comparing HFNC vs. NIV After Extubation

 ICU mortality

2(1434)

1.20(0.87–1.85)

0.40

0%

 Hospital mortality

–

–

–

–

 ICU length of stay

1(604)a

–

–

–

 Hospital length of stay

–

–

–

–

 ED length of stay

–

–

–

–

  1. HFNC High flow nasal cannulae, COT Conventional oxygen therapy, ED Emergency department
  2. aonly 1 trials was reported, no summary estimate of effect can be combined
  3. b3 trials were included, but the data was expressed in different ways (mean/median), no summary estimate of effect can be combined