Skip to main content

Table 2 Lung damage score

From: Variable ventilation improves pulmonary function and reduces lung damage without increasing bacterial translocation in a rat model of experimental pneumonia

 

SAL

PA

Features

VCV

VV

VCV

VV

Light microscopy

    

Perivascular edema [0–16]

1.5 [1.0–2.0]

1.0 [0.0–2.0]

6.0 [4.5–6.0]*

2.5 [2.0–3.75]#, ‡

Septal neutrophils [0–16]

0.0 [0.0–0.0]

0.0 [0.0–0.0]

5.0 [3.3–6.0]*

2.0 [1.0–4.0]#, ‡

Necrotizing vasculitis [0–16]

1.5 [0.0–2.0]

1.0 [1.0–1.0]

6.0 [6.0–6.0]*

3.0 [2.0–5.5]#, ‡

Total lung damage score [0–48]

2.5 [2.0–3.8]

2.0 [1.0–3.0]

16 [15–18]*

8.0 [5.5–11.3]#, ‡

Transmission electron microscopy

    

Type 2 epithelial cell damage [0–16]

3 [2–3]

2 [1–2]

6 [4–9]

5 [5–6]

Alveolar capillary membrane damage [0–16]

2 [2–3]

1 [1–2]

9 [4–12]*

5 [5–5]

Organelle injury [0–16]

2 [2–3]

1 [1–2]

6 [6–9]**

6 [4–6]

Total ultrastructural damage score [0–48]

7 [6–9]

5 [3–5]

24 [14–27]***

16 [14–17]##, ‡

  1. Values are median and interquartile range [25–75%] of 8 animals in each group
  2. Abbreviations: SAL-VCV rats administered intratracheal saline and ventilated with volume-controlled ventilation, SAL-VV rats administered intratracheal saline and ventilated with variable ventilation, PA-VCV rats administered intratracheal Pseudomonas aeruginosa and ventilated with volume-controlled ventilation, PA-VV rats administered intratracheal Pseudomonas aeruginosa and ventilated with variable ventilation
  3. Comparisons were performed by two-way ANOVA followed by the Holm-Šídák multiple comparison test (p < 0.05). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 significantly different from SAL-VCV. #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01 significantly different from SAL-VV. ‡p < 0.05 significantly different from PA-VCV