Skip to main content

Table 3 Practitioners’ responses to questions regarding sources of e-cigarette guidance and reported advice provided

From: Electronic cigarettes: a survey of perceived patient use and attitudes among members of the British thoracic oncology group

Variable

Participants n (%)

Awareness of IASLC statement regarding e-cigarette use among cancer patientsa

 
 

Yes

37 (27.6)

 

No

97 (72.4)

Workplace recommended advice that practitioners should provide regarding e-cigarettesa

 

Yes

12 (9.0)

 

No

122 (91.0)

“I feel I need more information and guidance regarding electronic cigarettes”a

 
 

Strongly agree

53 (39.6)

 

Agree

71 (53.0)

 

Neutral

4 (3.0)

 

Disagree

6 (4.5)

 

Strongly disagree

0 (0.0)

“I feel confident advising patients regarding electronic cigarettes” a

 
 

Strongly agree

4 (3.0)

 

Agree

24 (18.0)

 

Neutral

39 (29.3)

 

Disagree

49 (36.8)

 

Strongly disagree

17 (12.8)

Advice given to patients regarding e-cigarettesb

 
 

E-cigarettes are less harmful than regular cigarettes

45 (23.7)

 

Paucity of research and uncertainty regarding adverse effects

41 (21.6)

 

Patients should avoid using regular or electronic cigarettes altogether

25 (13.2)

 

E-cigarettes may be an effective tool for smoking cessation

20 (10.5)

 

E-cigarette use is discouraged

11 (5.8)

 

Seek support via Stop Smoking Services

10 (5.3)

 

Lack of regulation and caution regarding quality control

10 (5.3)

 

No advice provided

9 (4.7)

 

E-cigarette use is encouraged

7 (3.7)

 

Consider the use of licenced smoking cessation treatments primarily

5 (2.6)

 

E-cigarettes may be harmful to health

3 (1.6)

 

Inadequate knowledge to advise

3 (1.6)

 

No clear guidelines from professional bodies

1 (0.5)

  1. aFigures do not equate to 141 due to some missing data, bMore than one answer could be provided