GOLD stage II | ||||||||
Tiotropium (n = 1554) | Control (n = 1602) | Tiotropium/control | ||||||
Year | N (%) | Patient-year | IRa | N (%) | Patient-year | IRa | RR | p-value |
(95 % CI) | ||||||||
1 | 114 (7) | 1312.9 | 8.7 | 158 (10) | 1255.7 | 12.6 | 0.69 | 0.0025 |
(0.54–0.88) | ||||||||
2 | 187 (12) | 2543.0 | 7.4 | 242 (15) | 2408.5 | 10.0 | 0.73 | 0.0013 |
(0.60–0.89) | ||||||||
3 | 249 (16) | 3709.7 | 6.7 | 312 (20) | 3483.4 | 9.0 | 0.75 | 0.0007 |
(0.63–0.89) | ||||||||
4 | 304 (20) | 4818.7 | 6.3 | 361 (23) | 4501.6 | 8.0 | 0.79 | 0.0021 |
(0.68–0.92) | ||||||||
GOLD stage III/IV (combined) | ||||||||
Tiotropium (n = 1554) | Control (n = 1602) | Tiotropium/control | ||||||
Year | N (%) | Patient-year | IRa | N (%) | Patient-year | IRa | RR | p-value |
(95 % CI) | ||||||||
1 | 315 (20) | 1354.3 | 23.3 | 385 (24) | 1340.5 | 28.7 | 0.81 | 0.0055 |
(0.70–0.94) | ||||||||
2 | 465 (30) | 2520.0 | 18.5 | 541 (34) | 2476.8 | 21.8 | 0.84 | 0.0077 |
(0.75–0.96) | ||||||||
3 | 579 (37) | 3547.6 | 16.3 | 659 (41) | 3474.6 | 19.0 | 0.86 | 0.0084 |
(0.77–0.96) | ||||||||
4 | 675 (43) | 4475.1 | 15.1 | 743 (46) | 4378.0 | 17.0 | 0.89 | 0.0266 |
(0.80–0.99) |